Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Washington

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Washington's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 56.5 across 8 systems; best 33, worst 67, so they disagree by 34 places.

Lab EPA
#59
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#60
down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#35
up 92026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#33
down 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#54
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#48
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#67
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#60
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#68 of 138
Schedule strength
#79 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#8 of 138
Game control
#73 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#71 of 138
Offense
#77 of 138
Defense
#65 of 138
Special teams
#84 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Washington · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.024 net EPA/play

#59

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

2.07 points

#60 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +3.75 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.05, schedule #72 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +0.44. That is worth +0.70 on its own; the preseason prior of +6.19 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +2.07.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Washington · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Washington State
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401858437
+14.00 → +14.00-2.500.76379.52%-7.021.095-0.6680.427
Week 2 · Utah State
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858446
+2.00 → +2.00-2.500.79379.90%-7.32-0.049-0.725-0.774
Week 3 · Eastern Washington
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858459
+32.00 → +32.00-2.500.824910.29%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.035-2.5720.463
Week 4 · Minnesota
home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401858470
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.857210.69%-0.24-0.588-0.026-0.614
Week 5 · USC
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858478
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.890911.11%+7.22-0.1670.8020.635
Week 6 · Iowa
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858487
-17.00 → -17.00-2.500.925911.55%+6.88-2.2520.795-1.457
Week 7 · Purdue
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858493
+12.00 → +12.00+2.500.962212.00%+0.881.7400.1061.846

Game terms +0.53 points; prior term +1.55 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +2.07 points. The preseason prior is +6.19 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

9.5 SP+ points

#35 · Up 9 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

4.75 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#48 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 1.40 on 361 plays; defense -3.34 on 358 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Washington 1 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 1-3 · home 3-2 · away 1-1 · expected wins 4.0
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-5 ATS (-8.9 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (+6.5 avg)
Head coach
Jedd Fisch · hired 2024-01-14 · 15-11 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #47 (202 pts) · 2025 #23 (235 pts) · 2026 #13 (262 pts)
Returning
54% of production · 57% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing94%94%
Receiving34%38%
Rushing52%36%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back183.330.885115.93
Defensive Line163.060.867013.87
Linebacker93.220.87507.87
Offensive Line183.330.870115.66
Quarterback53.400.89664.48
Receiver203.350.881717.63
Running Back53.200.88854.44
Special Teams83.130.85506.84

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Demond Williams Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5079653. Washington (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.22415657.9%
Pass 79.5% · Rush 27.8%

1st 53.4% · 2nd 56.0% · 3rd 72.5%

Standard downs 52.5% · Passing downs 71.3%

Not linked
Elijah Brown · QB

CFBD athlete 5079318. Stanford (2024–2025); Washington (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.4777237.1%
Pass 58.8% · Rush 2.6%

1st 34.7% · 2nd 37.7% · 3rd 40.5%

Standard downs 32.0% · Passing downs 50.9%

2024: 4★ · 0.9133
Brian Bonner Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5200430. Washington (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0925717.0%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 40.0%

1st 21.7% · 2nd 19.2% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 20.4% · Passing downs 8.7%

2026: 4★ · 0.9598
Demond Williams Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5079653. Washington (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3083857.9%
Pass 79.5% · Rush 27.8%

1st 53.4% · 2nd 56.0% · 3rd 72.5%

Standard downs 52.5% · Passing downs 71.3%

Not linked
Tyler Robles · PK

CFBD athlete 5153154. USC (2023–2024); Washington (2026–2026); Texas State (2025–2025)

Kicker PAAR1.21011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: stars unavailable
Ansu Sanoe · RB

CFBD athlete 5159065. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 12.5%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Baron Naone · TE

CFBD athlete 5164338. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 8.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Chris Lawson · WR

CFBD athlete 5141559. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.4%
Pass 15.4% · Rush 1.1%

1st 9.9% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 10.3%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 11.5%

Not linked
Decker DeGraaf · TE

CFBD athlete 5079373. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 7.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Derek Zammit · QB

CFBD athlete 5209387. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.2%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Dezmen Roebuck · WR

CFBD athlete 5166797. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.0%
Pass 24.7% · Rush 2.7%

1st 12.7% · 2nd 14.5% · 3rd 20.7%

Standard downs 13.4% · Passing downs 19.2%

Not linked
Jayden Limar · RB

CFBD athlete 4870868. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——18.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 42.9%

1st 27.6% · 2nd 15.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 24.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jordan Clay · WR

CFBD athlete 5158960. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 8.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 6.2%

Not linked
Justice Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 5146758. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Kade Eldridge · TE

CFBD athlete 5077668. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 3.8%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 5.0%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 1.6%

Not linked
Mason James · WR

CFBD athlete 5198507. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 1.6%

1st 6.7% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 6.6% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Quaid Carr · RB

CFBD athlete 5209302. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 17.9%

1st 13.8% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 12.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Rashid Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 4871068. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.2%
Pass 12.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 5.5% · 3rd 10.3%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Ryken Moon · RB

CFBD athlete 5294121. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.1%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Trevion Cooley · RB

CFBD athlete 4601283. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.8%
Pass 1.3% · Rush 20.6%

1st 9.6% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 11.1% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Trez Davis · WR

CFBD athlete 5274332. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 9.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 5.7%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 10.5%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 14 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Bodpegn Miller · WROhio State2026-01-283★ / 0.8600Immediate
Christian Moss · WRKennesaw State2026-01-183★ / 0.8700Immediate
Darin Conley · DLBall State2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
DeSean Watts · DLSacramento State2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Elijah Brown · QBStanford2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Emmanuel Karnley · CBVirginia2026-01-083★ / 0.8800Immediate
Hunter Green · PSan Diego State2026-01-052★ / —Immediate
Hunter McKee · KEastern Washington2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jayden Limar · RBOregon2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kai McClendon · DLMississippi State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kolt Dieterich · OTSam Houston2026-01-054★ / 0.9200Immediate
Logan George · EDGEOhio State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Trey Cooley · RBTroy2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyler Robles · KTexas State2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Outgoing · 23 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Mohammed · RBCalifornia2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Armon Parker · DLMaryland2026-01-303★ / 0.8600Immediate
Audric Harris · WRHawai'i2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Bryce Butler · DLTexas Tech2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Caleb Smith · DLAlabama2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Davit Boyajyan · IOLCal Poly2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Demond Williams Jr. · QBNot reported2026-01-074★ / 0.9600Immediate
Deven Bryant · LBUSC2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Dominic Macon · DLOklahoma State2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dusty Zimmer · PSouthern Miss2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Dyson McCutcheon · SMiddle Tennessee2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ethan Moczulski · KIllinois2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Hunter Solwold · LSFlorida2026-01-143★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jayvon Parker · DLMaryland2026-01-303★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jonathan Epperson Jr. · LBPortland State2026-01-193★ / —Immediate
Kevin Green Jr. · WRNot reported2026-01-144★ / —Immediate
Leroy Bryant · CBStanford2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Marcus Harris · WRUCLA2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Maximus McCree · OTWashington State2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Paki Finau · IOLBYU2026-01-123★ / 0.8700Immediate
Raiden Vines-Bright · WRArizona State2026-01-043★ / 0.8900Immediate
Vincent Holmes · SOklahoma State2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zachary Henning · IOLArizona2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Washington. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Jedd Fisch · career 32–33 across 7 seasons and 3 schools

Tenure timeline · 25 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Jedd Fisch · active at capture

    15–11 · 26 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2024-01-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2022–2023 · Kalen DeBoer

    25–3 · 28 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2021-11-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2021–2021 · Bob Gregory

    0–3 · 3 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-11-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2020–2021 · Jimmy Lake

    7–6 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2019-12-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2014–2019 · Chris Petersen

    55–26 · 81 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2013-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2013–2013 · Marques Tuiasosopo

    1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2013-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2009–2013 · Steve Sarkisian

    34–29 · 63 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2008-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2005–2008 · Tyrone Willingham

    11–37 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 2003–2004 · Keith Gilbertson

    7–16 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2003-06-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1999–2002 · Rick Neuheisel

    33–16 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1993–1998 · Jim Lambright

    44–25–1 · 70 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1975–1992 · Don James

    150–60–2 · 212 attributed games · 18 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1957–1974 · Jim Owens

    99–82–6 · 187 attributed games · 18 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1956–1956 · Darrell Royal

    5–5 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1953–1955 · John Cherberg

    10–18–2 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1948–1952 · Howard Odell

    23–25–2 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1944–1947 · Ralph Welch

    19–16 · 35 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1942–1942 · Ralph Welch

    4–3–3 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1930–1941 · James Phelan

    65–37–8 · 110 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1921–1929 · Enoch Bagshaw

    64–21–6 · 91 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1920–1920 · Stub Allison

    1–5 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1919–1919 · Claude Hunt

    5–1 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1918–1918 · Anthony Savage

    1–1 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1917–1917 · Claude Hunt

    1–2–1 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1916–1916 · Gilmour Dobie

    6–0–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Jedd Fisch · incomplete attribution0–0——8.20.713—
2025 · Jedd Fisch9–45–41–018.417.423—
2024 · Jedd Fisch6–74–50–13.14.847—
2023 · Kalen DeBoer14–110–01–116.416.5262
2022 · Kalen DeBoer11–27–21–015.712968
2021 · Jimmy Lake · incomplete attribution4–5——-0.72.335—
2021 · Bob Gregory · incomplete attribution0–3——-0.72.335—
2020 · Jimmy Lake3–13–10–011.7—16—
2019 · Chris Petersen8–54–51–018.315.615—
2018 · Chris Petersen10–48–20–119.912.216—
2017 · Chris Petersen10–37–20–122.120.12216
2016 · Chris Petersen12–29–10–126.727.3294
2015 · Chris Petersen7–64–51–09.713.726—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-19 18:26:12 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play63 / 13854.725 / 13882.5
Success rate72 / 13848.248 / 13865.7
Explosiveness53 / 13862.065 / 13853.3
Standard-down success64 / 13854.041 / 13870.8
Passing-down success104 / 13824.865 / 13853.3
Pass PPA27 / 13881.060 / 13856.9
Rush PPA116 / 13816.119 / 13886.9
Pass explosiveness87 / 13837.282 / 13840.9
Rush explosiveness106 / 13823.438 / 13873.0
Line yards112 / 13819.013 / 13891.2
Second-level yards124 / 13810.259 / 13857.7
Open-field yards43 / 13869.377 / 13844.5
Stuff rate123 / 13810.95 / 13897.1
Power success120 / 13813.1T8 / 13894.5
HavocT74 / 13846.421 / 13885.4
Front-seven havoc99 / 13828.537 / 13873.7
DB havocT30 / 13877.4T21 / 13884.7
Points / opportunity34 / 13875.951 / 13863.5
Average field positionT112 / 13818.6T108 / 13821.2
Field-position expected pointsT89 / 13835.4109 / 13821.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Demond Williams Jr. · QBUsage 57.9% · Avg PPA 0.226 · Total 52.007
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.22652.00757.9%
Pass0.21740.27779.5%
Rush0.38015.97027.8%
1st down0.22921.74753.4%
2nd down0.26518.52056.0%
3rd down0.20311.76272.5%
Standard downs0.22733.65952.5%
Passing downs0.22418.34771.3%
Elijah Brown · QBUsage 37.1% · Avg PPA 0.471 · Total 35.352
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47135.35237.1%
Pass0.71950.30958.8%
Rush-1.004-2.0092.6%
1st down0.0993.44934.7%
2nd down0.1944.46537.7%
3rd down1.45021.75540.5%
Standard downs0.39818.70932.0%
Passing downs0.59416.64350.9%
Jayden Limar · RBUsage 18.8% · Avg PPA -0.311 · Total -3.733
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.311-3.73318.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.311-3.73342.9%
1st down0.3803.04127.6%
2nd down-0.850-2.55115.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.311-3.73324.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Brian Bonner Jr. · RBUsage 17.0% · Avg PPA 0.003 · Total 0.189
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0030.18917.0%
Pass0.9013.6021.8%
Rush-0.054-3.37240.0%
1st down-0.086-3.44521.7%
2nd down0.0942.24619.2%
3rd down-0.427-0.8552.7%
Standard downs-0.028-1.57220.4%
Passing downs0.1761.7628.7%
Dezmen Roebuck · WRUsage 15.0% · Avg PPA 0.321 · Total 22.128
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.32122.12815.0%
Pass0.35422.65324.7%
Rush-0.105-0.5252.7%
1st down0.47112.72212.7%
2nd down0.4529.48614.5%
3rd down0.3646.55520.7%
Standard downs0.37916.66313.4%
Passing downs0.2195.46519.2%
Chris Lawson · WRUsage 9.4% · Avg PPA 0.877 · Total 37.691
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.87737.6919.4%
Pass0.93537.39115.4%
Rush-0.071-0.1411.1%
1st down0.75815.9149.9%
2nd down0.89410.7308.3%
3rd down0.7576.81110.3%
Standard downs0.93826.2528.5%
Passing downs0.76311.43911.5%
Quaid Carr · RBUsage 9.4% · Avg PPA -0.216 · Total -1.294
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.216-1.2949.4%
Pass-0.100-0.1002.9%
Rush-0.239-1.19417.9%
1st down-0.186-0.74313.8%
2nd down-0.276-0.55110.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.216-1.29412.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Trevion Cooley · RBUsage 8.8% · Avg PPA -0.209 · Total -7.304
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.209-7.3048.8%
Pass-1.920-5.7611.3%
Rush-0.048-1.54320.6%
1st down-0.123-2.2159.6%
2nd down-0.080-1.03510.4%
3rd down0.0330.0984.0%
Standard downs-0.199-6.35511.1%
Passing downs-0.316-0.9492.7%
Rashid Williams · WRUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA 0.544 · Total 17.962
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.54417.9627.2%
Pass0.54417.96212.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4527.2387.5%
2nd down0.4623.6965.5%
3rd down0.7817.02810.3%
Standard downs0.71914.3726.1%
Passing downs0.2763.59010.0%
Trez Davis · WRUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.496 · Total 7.435
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4967.4355.4%
Pass0.4967.4359.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0290.1473.7%
2nd down0.2171.3017.0%
3rd down1.0453.1355.7%
Standard downs0.5804.0573.4%
Passing downs0.4223.37810.5%
Mason James · WRUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA 0.246 · Total 2.455
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2462.4555.1%
Pass0.2942.6447.1%
Rush-0.189-0.1891.6%
1st down0.3041.8266.7%
2nd down-0.870-1.7393.3%
3rd down-0.463-0.4632.5%
Standard downs0.3242.9186.6%
Passing downs-0.463-0.4631.7%
Ansu Sanoe · RBUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA -0.091 · Total -0.638
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.091-0.6385.0%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.091-0.63812.5%
1st down0.1160.4636.1%
2nd down-0.184-0.3684.7%
3rd down-0.732-0.7323.7%
Standard downs-0.091-0.6386.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jordan Clay · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.634 · Total 8.871
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6348.8715.0%
Pass0.6348.8718.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8362.5072.4%
2nd down0.5393.2367.0%
3rd down0.0060.0256.9%
Standard downs0.2732.4614.6%
Passing downs1.2826.4116.2%
Baron Naone · TEUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 1.073 · Total 22.527
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.07322.5274.6%
Pass1.07322.5278.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.16611.6564.7%
2nd down0.4993.4914.8%
3rd down1.3183.9533.4%
Standard downs0.82013.9325.2%
Passing downs2.1498.5953.1%
Decker DeGraaf · TEUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.429 · Total 8.148
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4298.1484.1%
Pass0.4298.1487.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6754.7243.3%
2nd down0.4944.4426.2%
3rd down-0.339-1.0183.4%
Standard downs0.6077.8894.0%
Passing downs0.0430.2594.6%
Kade Eldridge · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 0.554 · Total 3.876
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5543.8762.9%
Pass-0.009-0.0262.4%
Rush0.9763.9023.8%
1st down-0.587-0.5870.9%
2nd down0.8603.4415.2%
3rd down0.5111.0235.0%
Standard downs0.7204.3233.4%
Passing downs-0.447-0.4471.6%
Ryken Moon · RBUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.418 · Total -0.418
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.418-0.4181.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.418-0.4183.1%
1st down-0.418-0.4182.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.418-0.4182.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Justice Williams · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 2.797 · Total 5.595
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.7975.5951.4%
Pass2.7975.5952.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down2.7975.5957.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs2.7975.5954.3%
Derek Zammit · QBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.525 · Total 0.525
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5250.5251.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5250.5253.2%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.5250.5256.3%
Standard downs0.5250.5251.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Washington sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.149 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.429 (48th percentile; 138 teams)48thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.259 (62nd percentile; 138 teams)62ndOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.355 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.014 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.019 (82nd percentile; 138 teams)82ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.390 (66th percentile; 138 teams)66thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.209 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.187 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85th
Values and percentiles
Washington metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.14955th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.42948th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.25962nd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.35581st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.01416th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.01982nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.39066th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.20953rd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.18785th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 245 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.1 yards (29th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.4 per completion. Completion 68.6%, 8.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.40.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense67.0%61.3%+5.7206 / 245
Defense allowed62.1%63.0%-0.9174 / 206

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Washington.

Target mix by zone, Washington offense
Short left33% · 78Short middle15% · 35Short right41% · 96Deep left5% · 13Deep middle1% · 3Deep right5% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Washington passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense24599%8.16.468.6%0.40+5.7 pp206
Passing defense20699%7.56.260.7%0.12-0.9 pp174

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2053.639.0%0.052.800.801.2019.8%63.6%
Defense allowed2403.638.2%-0.052.500.900.9025.3%57.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense201 / 205198720330182 / 182 · 100.0%
Defense allowed231 / 2402291113220225 / 225 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +5.7 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-1.36.614.4W1W1 vs Washington State: +7.0 ppW2W2 vs Utah State: +0.2 ppW3W4W4 vs Minnesota: +6.6 ppW5W5 vs USC: -1.3 ppW6W6 vs Iowa: +8.1 ppW7W7 vs Purdue: +14.4 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Washington State353470.6%63.5%+7.0 pp6.40.23294.60.03
W2Utah State414163.4%63.2%+0.2 pp8.00.16333.3-0.03
W3Eastern Washington360———5.60.72265.70.17
W4Minnesota282864.3%57.7%+6.6 pp11.50.25261.80.11
W5USC272759.3%60.5%-1.3 pp9.00.29323.50.22
W6Iowa514967.3%59.3%+8.1 pp9.70.5325-0.1-0.35
W7Purdue272777.8%63.4%+14.4 pp6.50.60345.50.09

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

33 punts · 47.9 gross yards/punt · 41.7 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 33/33 punts. Known net yards: 29/33 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 5.9 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Purdue252.532.01/2
Week 6 · Iowa747.343.97/7
Week 5 · USC651.742.33/6
Week 4 · Minnesota647.342.86/6
Week 3 · Eastern Washington252.552.52/2
Team style
Rating history