Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Wake Forest

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Wake Forest's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 15.5 across 8 systems; best 9, worst 25, so they disagree by 16 places.

Lab EPA
#9
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#11
up 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#25
down 52026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#20
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#16
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#15
down 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#22
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#9
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#11 of 138
Schedule strength
#38 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#63 of 138
Game control
#15 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#12 of 138
Offense
#18 of 138
Defense
#30 of 138
Special teams
#49 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Wake Forest · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.178 net EPA/play

#9

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

12.07 points

#11 · Up 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +16.32 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -0.69, schedule #51 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +15.63 on its own; the preseason prior of +1.37 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +12.07.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Wake Forest · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Akron
home · 2026-09-03 · ID 401858204
+22.00 → +22.00-2.500.76379.52%-16.431.857-1.5650.293
Week 2 · Purdue
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858224
+2.00 → +1.00 (OT)+2.500.79379.90%+0.880.3460.0870.434
Week 3 · Miami
home · 2026-09-18 · ID 401858226
-13.00 → -13.00-2.500.824910.29%+19.25-1.5941.9810.386
Week 4 · Louisville
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858243
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.857210.69%+9.170.5880.9801.568
Week 5 · Stanford
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858251
+54.00 → +35.00-2.500.890911.11%-7.743.611-0.8602.751
Week 6 · NC State
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858260
+24.00 → +24.00+2.500.925911.55%-2.523.060-0.2912.768
Week 7 · California
away · 2026-10-18 · ID 401858269
+34.00 → +34.00+2.500.962212.00%-7.104.380-0.8523.528

Game terms +11.73 points; prior term +0.34 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +12.07 points. The preseason prior is +1.37 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

12.2 SP+ points

#25 · Down 5 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

17.09 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#15 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 8.51 on 380 plays; defense -8.58 on 381 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Wake Forest 2 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-1 · conf 4-1 · home 2-1 · away 4-0 · expected wins 5.4
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #14 · Coaches Poll #15
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-2 ATS (+14.1 avg) · 2025: 9-4 ATS (+5.7 avg)
Head coach
Jake Dickert · hired 2024-12-18 · 9-4 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #52 (196 pts) · 2025 #63 (189 pts) · 2026 #39 (218 pts)
Returning
14% of production · 12% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing23%1%
Receiving13%28%
Rushing5%10%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back193.000.861016.36
Defensive Line183.000.863215.54
Linebacker83.000.86306.90
Offensive Line153.000.860012.90
Quarterback63.170.87495.25
Receiver183.060.859415.47
Running Back73.140.86866.08
Special Teams43.250.86573.46

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Giovanni Lopez · QB

CFBD athlete 4920227. South Alabama (2023–2024); North Carolina (2025–2025); Wake Forest (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.48623257.4%
Pass 95.6% · Rush 22.3%

1st 51.2% · 2nd 58.0% · 3rd 67.8%

Standard downs 51.9% · Passing downs 70.2%

2023: 3★ · 0.8525
Ty Clark III · RB

CFBD athlete 5186586. Wake Forest (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1077215.1%
Pass 0.9% · Rush 29.7%

1st 17.4% · 2nd 17.8% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 18.8% · Passing downs 6.4%

2024: 3★ · 0.8589
Deuce Lawrence · RB

CFBD athlete 5382529. Wake Forest (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1646615.5%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 27.5%

1st 20.8% · 2nd 14.0% · 3rd 7.8%

Standard downs 18.8% · Passing downs 7.8%

2026: 3★ · 0.8789
Giovanni Lopez · QB

CFBD athlete 4920227. South Alabama (2023–2024); North Carolina (2025–2025); Wake Forest (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.4805757.4%
Pass 95.6% · Rush 22.3%

1st 51.2% · 2nd 58.0% · 3rd 67.8%

Standard downs 51.9% · Passing downs 70.2%

2023: 3★ · 0.8525
Connor Calvert · PK

CFBD athlete 5228152. Wake Forest (2025–2026); Washington State (2024–2024)

Kicker PAAR2.51011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: stars unavailable
Antonio Meeks · WR

CFBD athlete 5099305. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Bryce Kania · WR

CFBD athlete 5216695. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 6.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
Carlos Hernandez · WR

CFBD athlete 5153074. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.7%
Pass 31.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 15.8% · 2nd 12.9% · 3rd 18.4%

Standard downs 13.7% · Passing downs 20.3%

Not linked
Chase Tyler · WR

CFBD athlete 5147203. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Devin Goldston · WR

CFBD athlete 5291782. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Dominick Barry · TE

CFBD athlete 5211200. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 4.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Drayden Dickmann · WR

CFBD athlete 5151274. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.5%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 4.6% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Hugh O'Brien · WR

CFBD athlete 5294107. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jack Foley · WR

CFBD athlete 5239156. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 14.2% · Rush 0.4%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Jamar Searcy · RB

CFBD athlete 5216505. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 10.2%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 2.7% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
KD Daniels · RB

CFBD athlete 5222223. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.9%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 1.3%

Not linked
Kameran Shanks · WR

CFBD athlete 5121666. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 11.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.8% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 7.8%

Standard downs 4.9% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Kamrean Johnson · TE

CFBD athlete 5086448. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Landon Morris · TE

CFBD athlete 4683306. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 13.3%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 11.5%

Not linked
Matthew Lusardi · TE

CFBD athlete 5097169. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Ryan Henley · RB

CFBD athlete 5219007. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 5.6%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Steele Pizzella · QB

CFBD athlete 5141634. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 6.9%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 14.5%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 14.6%

Not linked
Walker Bryson · WR

CFBD athlete 5209348. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked
Will Loerzel · TE

CFBD athlete 5155870. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 24 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Antonio Meeks · WRLouisville2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bernard Causey III · CBGeorgia State2026-01-053★ / 0.8400Immediate
Brian Blades ll · CBFlorida International2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Buom Jock · LBCalifornia2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chase Tyler · WRDuke2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
D.J. Johnson · EDGENew Hampshire2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Drayden Dickmann · WRRice2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ethan Calloway · OTLSU2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Gio Lopez · QBNorth Carolina2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
John Ohnegian · IOLBucknell2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josh Patterson · SIowa State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
KD Daniels · RBFlorida2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kam Shanks · WRArkansas2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Landon Morris · TECalifornia2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Matt Herron · DLWeber State2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ny Carr · WRMiami2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ryan Berger · OTOregon State2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Sawyer Seidl · RBNorth Dakota2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Sydir Mitchell · DLLSU2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tolu Olajide · OTNew Hampshire2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tylan McNichols · LBUAB2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Vincent Firenze · SDayton2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Will Way · IOLWeber State2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Wondame Davis Jr. · WRUTEP2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 23 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ben Grice · WRRice2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Chris Barnes · WROklahoma State2026-01-114★ / 0.9000Immediate
Cole Funderburk · EDGEMarshall2026-01-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
Darius Jones · LBNot reported2025-12-143★ / —Immediate
Derrell Johnson II · IOLNot reported2026-01-103★ / 0.8300Withdrawn
Deshawn Purdie · QBLiberty2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Drew Pickett · RBAlabama A&M2026-02-033★ / —Immediate
EJ Reid · WRUAB2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Elijiah Oehlke · QBBryant2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Harry Lodge · TEUCLA2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ian VerSteeg · WROhio2026-01-173★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jacob Cosby-Mosley · SWestern Kentucky2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jeremiah Melvin · WREast Carolina2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ka'Shawn Thomas · DLNot reported2025-12-103★ / 0.8200Immediate
Kendal Howard · EDGEAustin Peay2026-01-243★ / —Immediate
Mateen Ibirogba · DLTexas Tech2026-01-074★ / 0.9600Immediate
Melvin Siani · OTTexas2026-01-154★ / 0.9300Immediate
Micah Mays Jr. · WRFlorida2026-01-073★ / 0.8800Immediate
Nathan Pahanich · OTUConn2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
RJ Vick · WRColorado State2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Sterling Berkhalter · WRTexas2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Tate Carney · RBNot reported2025-12-103★ / 0.8300Immediate
William Wiebush · SAustin Peay2026-01-233★ / 0.8300Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Wake Forest. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Jake Dickert · career 32–24 across 6 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 30 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Jake Dickert · active at capture

    9–4 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2014–2024 · Dave Clawson

    67–69 · 136 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Hired 2013-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2001–2013 · Jim Grobe

    77–82 · 159 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1993–2000 · Jim Caldwell

    26–63 · 89 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1987–1992 · Bill Dooley

    29–36–2 · 67 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1981–1986 · Al Groh

    26–40 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1978–1980 · John Mackovic

    14–20 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1973–1977 · Chuck Mills

    11–43–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1972–1972 · Tom Harper

    2–9 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1969–1971 · Cal Stoll

    15–17 · 32 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1964–1968 · William Tate

    17–32–1 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1960–1963 · Billy Hildebrand

    7–33 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1956–1959 · Paul Amen

    11–26–3 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1951–1955 · Tom Rogers

    21–25–4 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1937–1950 · D.C. Walker

    77–51–6 · 134 attributed games · 14 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1933–1936 · Jim Weaver

    10–23–1 · 34 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1929–1932 · F.S. Miller

    18–15–4 · 37 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1928–1928 · Stanley Cofall

    2–6–2 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1926–1927 · James Baldwin

    7–10–3 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1923–1925 · Hank Garrity

    19–7–1 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1922–1922 · George Levene

    3–5–2 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1920–1921 · J.L. White

    4–15 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1918–1919 · Harry Rabenhorst

    3–8 · 11 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1917–1917 · E.T. MacDonnell

    1–6–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1916–1916 · G.M. Billings

    3–3 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1914–1915 · W.C. Smith

    6–10 · 16 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1911–1913 · Frank Thompson

    5–19 · 24 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1910–1910 · Reddy Rowe

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  29. 1909–1909 · A.T. Myers

    2–4 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  30. 1908–1908 · A.P. Hall

    1–4 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Jake Dickert · incomplete attribution0–0——13.613.439—
2025 · Jake Dickert9–44–41–05.74.263—
2024 · Dave Clawson4–82–60–0-5.7-6.252—
2023 · Dave Clawson4–81–70–0-7.9-4.153—
2022 · Dave Clawson8–53–51–08.27.471—
2021 · Dave Clawson11–37–31–010.112.56615
2020 · Dave Clawson4–53–40–10.8—60—
2019 · Dave Clawson8–54–40–120.657—
2018 · Dave Clawson7–63–51–03.60.864—
2017 · Dave Clawson8–54–41–010.513.868—
2016 · Dave Clawson7–63–51–0-0.60.257—
2015 · Dave Clawson3–91–70–0-4.5-3.551—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-23 16:45:46 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play4 / 13897.855 / 13860.6
Success rate24 / 13883.287 / 13837.2
Explosiveness26 / 13881.84 / 13897.8
Standard-down success48 / 13865.7101 / 13827.0
Passing-down success5 / 13897.149 / 13865.0
Pass PPA8 / 13894.942 / 13870.1
Rush PPA15 / 13889.841 / 13870.8
Pass explosiveness41 / 13870.81 / 138100.0
Rush explosiveness48 / 13865.723 / 13883.9
Line yards51 / 13863.530 / 13878.8
Second-level yards57 / 13859.113 / 13891.2
Open-field yards83 / 13840.112 / 13892.0
Stuff rate64 / 13854.015 / 13889.8
Power successT83 / 13839.418 / 13887.6
Havoc6 / 13896.4T73 / 13846.7
Front-seven havoc24 / 13883.2T42 / 13869.0
DB havoc7 / 13895.6T101 / 13825.9
Points / opportunity12 / 13892.023 / 13883.9
Average field positionT67 / 13851.5T7 / 13895.3
Field-position expected points63 / 13854.7T10 / 13893.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Giovanni Lopez · QBUsage 57.4% · Avg PPA 0.556 · Total 148.401
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.556148.40157.4%
Pass0.493106.49395.6%
Rush0.82241.90722.3%
1st down0.29230.94851.2%
2nd down0.56251.17558.0%
3rd down0.95858.40967.8%
Standard downs0.40568.10651.9%
Passing downs0.81180.29570.2%
Carlos Hernandez · WRUsage 15.7% · Avg PPA 0.913 · Total 57.537
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.91357.53715.7%
Pass0.91357.53731.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.56915.93515.8%
2nd down1.17421.13312.9%
3rd down1.43420.08018.4%
Standard downs0.59522.60813.7%
Passing downs1.39734.92920.3%
Deuce Lawrence · RBUsage 15.5% · Avg PPA 0.159 · Total 11.455
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.15911.45515.5%
Pass0.2582.3254.0%
Rush0.1459.13127.5%
1st down0.0090.39620.8%
2nd down0.46510.22014.0%
3rd down0.1200.8407.8%
Standard downs0.0955.77518.8%
Passing downs0.5165.6807.8%
Ty Clark III · RBUsage 15.1% · Avg PPA -0.022 · Total -1.545
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.022-1.54515.1%
Pass0.6781.3570.9%
Rush-0.043-2.90229.7%
1st down-0.077-2.78217.4%
2nd down0.1915.35617.8%
3rd down0.0330.1635.6%
Standard downs-0.107-6.55618.8%
Passing downs0.5575.0106.4%
Jack Foley · WRUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.662 · Total 21.851
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.66221.8517.1%
Pass0.73823.61314.2%
Rush-1.762-1.7620.4%
1st down0.1231.7296.8%
2nd down0.6728.7348.3%
3rd down1.6568.2825.6%
Standard downs0.3999.1847.1%
Passing downs1.26712.6677.1%
Steele Pizzella · QBUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA 0.439 · Total 7.894
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4397.8946.9%
Pass0.5595.5897.1%
Rush0.2882.3056.9%
1st down0.7072.8273.4%
2nd down0.5043.0247.2%
3rd down0.2552.04314.5%
Standard downs1.0666.3943.3%
Passing downs0.1251.49914.6%
Jamar Searcy · RBUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.284 · Total 5.680
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2845.6806.0%
Pass-0.250-0.5001.4%
Rush0.3436.17910.2%
1st down0.1061.1697.4%
2nd down0.0520.1552.7%
3rd down0.7264.3559.1%
Standard downs0.3906.2416.9%
Passing downs-0.140-0.5624.0%
Kameran Shanks · WRUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.438 · Total 11.376
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.43811.3765.6%
Pass0.43811.37611.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0570.6865.8%
2nd down0.3372.3604.5%
3rd down1.1908.3307.8%
Standard downs-0.105-1.6834.9%
Passing downs1.30613.0597.1%
Antonio Meeks · WRUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA 0.342 · Total 5.806
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3425.8065.1%
Pass0.3425.80610.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9118.2026.1%
2nd down-0.291-1.1653.7%
3rd down0.9562.8674.5%
Standard downs0.3483.8264.8%
Passing downs0.3301.9805.9%
Landon Morris · TEUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA -0.172 · Total -0.515
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.172-0.5154.4%
Pass-0.172-0.5158.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.694-0.6944.3%
3rd down0.0890.17913.3%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.172-0.51511.5%
Drayden Dickmann · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.177 · Total 2.306
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1772.3063.3%
Pass0.2703.2456.1%
Rush-0.939-0.9390.5%
1st down0.0500.2512.8%
2nd down-0.041-0.2444.6%
3rd down1.1492.2992.5%
Standard downs0.1971.5792.9%
Passing downs0.1450.7264.1%
Ryan Henley · RBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.619 · Total 1.237
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6191.2373.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.6191.2375.6%
1st down0.3800.3803.3%
2nd down0.8570.8575.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.6191.2374.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Kamrean Johnson · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.167 · Total 2.005
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1672.0053.0%
Pass0.1672.0056.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1711.1964.0%
2nd down0.0770.2312.3%
3rd down0.2890.5782.5%
Standard downs-0.001-0.0062.9%
Passing downs0.5032.0113.3%
Will Loerzel · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.083 · Total 0.666
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0830.6663.0%
Pass0.0830.6665.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0490.1482.5%
2nd down0.2581.0324.2%
3rd down-0.514-0.5142.0%
Standard downs-0.148-0.8893.2%
Passing downs0.7781.5552.4%
Bryce Kania · WRUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 1.503 · Total 6.011
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.5036.0112.9%
Pass1.5036.0116.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0552.1103.4%
2nd down1.9503.9014.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.9882.9653.3%
Passing downs3.0463.0462.2%
KD Daniels · RBUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA -0.454 · Total -3.175
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.454-3.1752.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.454-3.1754.9%
1st down-0.516-2.5814.1%
2nd down-0.297-0.5942.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.502-3.0133.2%
Passing downs-0.162-0.1621.3%
Dominick Barry · TEUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.877 · Total 9.648
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8779.6482.4%
Pass0.8779.6484.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.7515.2521.4%
2nd down0.6133.0673.2%
3rd down0.4431.3293.3%
Standard downs1.7308.6481.5%
Passing downs0.1671.0004.3%
Chase Tyler · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.866 · Total -0.866
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.866-0.8661.5%
Pass-0.866-0.8663.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.866-0.8667.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.866-0.8666.7%
Devin Goldston · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 3.047 · Total 3.047
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall3.0473.0471.5%
Pass3.0473.0473.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down3.0473.0474.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs3.0473.0472.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Hugh O'Brien · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.520 · Total 0.520
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5200.5201.5%
Pass0.5200.5202.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.5200.5204.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5200.5202.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Walker Bryson · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 1.421 · Total 2.842
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.4212.8421.5%
Pass1.4212.8423.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.2521.2521.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.5901.5903.7%
Standard downs1.2521.2521.0%
Passing downs1.5901.5903.0%
Matthew Lusardi · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 1.900 · Total 1.900
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.9001.9001.4%
Pass1.9001.9002.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.9001.9003.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.9001.9002.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Wake Forest sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.340 (98th percentile; 138 teams)98thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.480 (83rd percentile; 138 teams)83rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.313 (82nd percentile; 138 teams)82ndOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.492 (95th percentile; 138 teams)95thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.227 (90th percentile; 138 teams)90thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.039 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61stDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.420 (37th percentile; 138 teams)37thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.041 (98th percentile; 138 teams)98thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.155 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47th
Values and percentiles
Wake Forest metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.34098th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.48083rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.31382nd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.49295th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.22790th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.03961st138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42037th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.04198th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15547th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 98% of 216 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.3 yards (35th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.0 per completion. Completion 67.6%, 9.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.56.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense67.0%61.4%+5.5212 / 216
Defense allowed75.0%66.8%+8.2264 / 266

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Wake Forest.

Target mix by zone, Wake Forest offense
Short left39% · 82Short middle19% · 40Short right28% · 60Deep left5% · 10Deep middle3% · 7Deep right6% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Wake Forest passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense21698%8.36.067.6%0.56+5.5 pp212
Passing defense26699%5.14.475.2%0.20+8.2 pp264

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2414.348.9%0.253.201.100.9014.7%70.6%
Defense allowed2253.039.7%0.002.700.800.5022.5%62.1%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense235 / 2412291210560222 / 225 · 98.7%
Defense allowed222 / 225217816450201 / 204 · 98.5%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +5.5 pp. 7 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-5.47.219.7W1W1 vs Akron: +1.1 ppW2W2 vs Purdue: +0.3 ppW3W3 vs Miami: -2.4 ppW4W4 vs Louisville: -5.4 ppW5W5 vs Stanford: +12.4 ppW6W6 vs NC State: +19.7 ppW7W7 vs California: +11.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Akron353562.9%61.8%+1.1 pp7.80.64335.80.34
W2Purdue272657.7%57.4%+0.3 pp8.80.61413.60.24
W3Miami464461.4%63.8%-2.4 pp7.00.18161.4-0.02
W4Louisville191861.1%66.5%-5.4 pp7.20.78424.40.03
W5Stanford303073.3%61.0%+12.4 pp9.10.50375.40.65
W6NC State333378.8%59.0%+19.7 pp9.10.75362.3-0.03
W7California262673.1%61.1%+11.9 pp9.40.78366.10.39

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

21 punts · 45.2 gross yards/punt · 40.7 net yards/punt

1 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 21/21 punts. Known net yards: 14/21 punts.

Our punt returns

6 returns · 8.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

2 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 6/6 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · California442.540.03/4
Week 6 · NC State341.341.33/3
Week 5 · Stanford347.7—0/3
Week 4 · Louisville350.342.02/3
Week 3 · Miami444.543.03/4
Team style
Rating history