Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Virginia Tech

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Virginia Tech's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 63.5 across 8 systems; best 38, worst 69, so they disagree by 31 places.

Lab EPA
#66
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#56
up 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#38
up 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#64
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#46
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#69
up 6 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#63
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#66
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#44 of 138
Schedule strength
#95 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#23 of 138
Game control
#27 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#46 of 138
Offense
#43 of 138
Defense
#56 of 138
Special teams
#14 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Virginia Tech · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-2 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.002 net EPA/play

#66

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

2.56 points

#56 · Up 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +9.42 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -5.54, schedule #98 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.16. That is worth +3.88 on its own; the preseason prior of -2.08 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +2.56.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Virginia Tech · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · VMI
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858211
+70.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.47%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.752-2.1170.635
Week 2 · Old Dominion
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858221
+23.00 → +23.00-2.500.79378.80%-10.091.804-0.8880.916
Week 3 · Maryland
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858232
+9.00 → +9.00+2.500.82499.15%-4.711.052-0.4310.621
Week 4 · Boston College
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858242
+7.00 → +7.00+2.500.85729.51%-1.580.903-0.1500.753
Week 5 · Pittsburgh
home · 2026-10-02 · ID 401858245
-2.00 → -2.00-2.500.89099.88%+4.19-0.4450.414-0.031
Week 6 · California
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858259
-5.00 → -5.00+2.500.925910.27%-7.10-0.257-0.729-0.985
Week 7 · Georgia Tech
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858264
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.962210.67%-5.430.800-0.5790.221
Week 8 · Clemson
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858276
+4.00 → +4.00+2.501.000011.09%+1.520.7210.1690.890

Game terms +3.02 points; prior term -0.46 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +2.56 points. The preseason prior is -2.08 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

9.0 SP+ points

#38 · Up 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-0.29 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#69 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 1.70 on 481 plays; defense 1.99 on 402 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Virginia Tech 10 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-2 · conf 3-2 · home 3-1 · away 3-1 · expected wins 5.6
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-3 ATS (+1.2 avg) · 2025: 3-9 ATS (-6.3 avg)
Head coach
James Franklin · hired 2025-11-17 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #45 (203 pts) · 2025 #39 (208 pts) · 2026 #30 (226 pts)
Returning
37% of production · 28% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing0%0%
Receiving54%58%
Rushing31%32%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.230.872711.34
Defensive Line133.080.872311.34
Linebacker93.220.88167.93
Offensive Line163.130.873013.97
Quarterback53.200.87344.37
Receiver123.500.881810.58
Running Back43.500.88393.54
Special Teams123.080.860510.33

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Ethan Grunkemeyer · QB

CFBD athlete 5144078. Penn State (2024–2025); Virginia Tech (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.48127353.7%
Pass 94.6% · Rush 13.5%

1st 44.2% · 2nd 56.9% · 3rd 70.7%

Standard downs 46.4% · Passing downs 71.3%

2024: 4★ · 0.9505
Ethan Grunkemeyer · QB

CFBD athlete 5144078. Penn State (2024–2025); Virginia Tech (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2864053.7%
Pass 94.6% · Rush 13.5%

1st 44.2% · 2nd 56.9% · 3rd 70.7%

Standard downs 46.4% · Passing downs 71.3%

2024: 4★ · 0.9505
John Love · PK

CFBD athlete 4880893. Virginia Tech (2022–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.79014—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2022: 3★ · 0.8181
A.J. Brand · WR

CFBD athlete 5296264. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 4.9%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Ayden Greene · WR

CFBD athlete 4918417. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 10.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 8.9%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Benji Gosnell · TE

CFBD athlete 4685366. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 2.1%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Bryce Baker · QB

CFBD athlete 5141366. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.0%
Pass 19.2% · Rush 3.8%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 12.7% · 3rd 16.7%

Standard downs 8.9% · Passing downs 17.9%

Not linked
Chanz Wiggins · WR

CFBD athlete 5079766. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Darius Taylor · RB

CFBD athlete 5161647. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 12.2%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Davion Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5158951. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 5.2%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Ja'Ricous Hairston · TE

CFBD athlete 5161652. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 0.9%

Not linked
Jeffrey Overton Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5214409. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 11.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 4.6%

Standard downs 4.5% · Passing downs 8.4%

Not linked
John Buetow · RB

CFBD athlete 5219039. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.9%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Keylen Adams · WR

CFBD athlete 5079290. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Luke Reynolds · TE

CFBD athlete 5138451. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.1%
Pass 21.4% · Rush 1.1%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 12.7% · 3rd 13.8%

Standard downs 9.0% · Passing downs 16.1%

Not linked
Marcellous Hawkins · RB

CFBD athlete 5260847. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 1.1%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Marlion Jackson · WR

CFBD athlete 5092787. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 7.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Messiah Mickens · RB

CFBD athlete 5159010. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 8.8%

1st 5.5% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Pierce Petersohn · TE

CFBD athlete 5276063. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Que'Sean Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5218787. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.8%
Pass 22.7% · Rush 1.1%

1st 9.8% · 2nd 15.7% · 3rd 10.3%

Standard downs 10.5% · Passing downs 14.9%

Not linked
Tyler Mason · RB

CFBD athlete 5142238. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.3%

1st 5.5% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 2.6%

Not linked
Tyseer Denmark · WR

CFBD athlete 5079402. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.9%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 1.1%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 29 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Bill Davis · RBLouisiana2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Bryce Baker · QBNorth Carolina2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Cam Chadwick · CBUConn2026-01-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
Chris Tangelo · SVanderbilt2026-03-034★ / —Immediate
Cortez Harris · EDGEPenn State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Curtis Jones Jr. · EDGEWest Virginia2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
DQ Smith · SSouth Carolina2026-08-233★ / —Immediate
Daniel Jennings · EDGEPenn State2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Deed Capper · LSWisconsin2026-01-213★ / 0.8000Immediate
Eric Mensah · DLOhio State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ethan Grunkemeyer · QBPenn State2026-01-144★ / 0.9300Immediate
Jaquez White · CBTroy2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Javion Hilson · EDGEMissouri2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jeff Exinor Jr. · WRPenn State2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Justin Bell · OTMichigan State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Justin Terry · OTOhio State2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kenny Woseley Jr. · CBPenn State2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Keon Wylie · LBPenn State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Logan Howland · OTOklahoma2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Luke Reynolds · TEPenn State2026-01-114★ / 0.9400Immediate
Marlion Jackson · WRLouisiana Tech2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Matt Henderson · TEPenn State2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Troutman III · IOLPenn State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mylachi Williams · EDGEPenn State2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Nathan Totten · PMarshall2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Que'Sean Brown · WRDuke2026-01-104★ / 0.9300Immediate
Randy Adirika · DLPenn State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Samuel Okunlola · EDGEColorado2026-01-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tyseer Denmark · WRPenn State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 27 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Arias Nash · DLTulsa2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Braydon Bennett · RBEastern Michigan2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Caleb Brown · CBHawai'i2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Caleb Woodson · LBAlabama2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cameron Seldon · WRSouth Florida2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Carter Stallard · IOLMurray State2026-01-143★ / —Immediate
Christian Ellis · SVirginia2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dante Lovett · CBUCLA2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Devin Alves · WRHawai'i2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Drew Doyle · LSWestern Michigan2026-01-21— / —Immediate
Garret Rangel · QBNot reported2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Hannes Hammer · OTUConn2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Isaiah Spencer · WROle Miss2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jahzari Priester · DLNorth Texas2026-01-11— / —Immediate
James Djonkam · EDGENot reported2025-12-112★ / —Immediate
James Jennette · EDGEUtah State2026-01-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jeremiah Coney · RBStony Brook2026-01-213★ / —Immediate
Joseph Reddish · CBApp State2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Keyshawn Burgos · EDGEPurdue2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Krystian Williams · CBRichmond2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Micah Matthews · WRJames Madison2026-01-223★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Short · LBTCU2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Noah Jenkins · LBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Tucker Holloway · WRNot reported2025-09-253★ / 0.8600Immediate
Will Johnson · LBNot reported2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
William Watson III · QBMassachusetts2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Zeke Wimbush · TENot reported2025-12-303★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Virginia Tech. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

James Franklin · career 128–60 across 16 seasons and 3 schools

Tenure timeline · 33 appointments
  1. 2026–present · James Franklin · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-11-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Philip Montgomery · interim

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-09-14. Effective dates: 2025-09-20 to unknown.

  3. 2022–2025 · Brent Pry

    16–24 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2021-11-30. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-09-20.

  4. 2021–2021 · J.C. Price

    1–2 · 3 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-11-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2016–2021 · Justin Fuente

    43–31 · 74 attributed games · 6 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2015-11-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1987–2015 · Frank Beamer

    238–121–2 · 361 attributed games · 29 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1978–1986 · Bill Dooley

    63–38–1 · 102 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1974–1977 · Jimmy Sharpe

    21–22–1 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1971–1973 · Charles Coffey

    12–20–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1961–1970 · Jerry Claiborne

    61–39–2 · 102 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1951–1960 · Frank Moseley

    54–42–4 · 100 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1948–1950 · Robert McNeish

    1–25–3 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1946–1947 · Jimmy Kitts

    7–9–3 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1945–1945 · Henry McEver

    2–6 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1942–1942 · S.D. Tilson

    7–2–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1942–1942 · Henry McEver

    7–2–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1941–1941 · Jimmy Kitts

    6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1932–1940 · Henry Redd

    43–37–8 · 88 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1930–1931 · O.E. Neale

    8–7–3 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1926–1929 · Andy Gustafson

    22–13–1 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1921–1925 · B.C. Cubbage

    30–12–6 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1920–1920 · Stanley Sutton

    4–6 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1917–1919 · Charles Bernier

    18–6–1 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1916–1916 · Jack Ingersoll

    7–2 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1912–1915 · Branch Bocock

    22–11–2 · 35 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1911–1911 · L.W. Reiss

    6–1–2 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1909–1910 · Branch Bocock

    12–3 · 15 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1908–1908 · R.M. Brown

    5–4 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  29. 1907–1907 · C.R. Williams

    7–2 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  30. 1905–1906 · C.P. Miles

    14–3–2 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  31. 1904–1904 · John O'Connor

    5–3 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  32. 1903–1903 · C.A. Lueder

    5–1 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  33. 1902–1902 · R.R. Brown

    3–2–1 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · James Franklin · incomplete attribution0–0——8.9230—
2025 · Philip Montgomery3–62–60–0-10.1-4.139—
2025 · Brent Pry0–30–00–0-10.1-4.139—
2024 · Brent Pry6–74–40–11010.445—
2023 · Brent Pry7–65–31–05.83.939—
2022 · Brent Pry3–81–60–0-9.5-8.736—
2021 · Justin Fuente · incomplete attribution5–5——2.41.245—
2021 · J.C. Price · incomplete attribution1–2——2.41.245—
2020 · Justin Fuente5–65–50–013.7—72—
2019 · Justin Fuente8–55–30–184.526—
2018 · Justin Fuente6–74–40–13.9-2.624—
2017 · Justin Fuente9–45–30–114.314.82624
2016 · Justin Fuente10–46–31–015.2154216
2015 · Frank Beamer7–64–41–011.46.929—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:16:46 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play45 / 13867.949 / 13865.0
Success rate52 / 13862.824 / 13883.2
Explosiveness56 / 13859.9113 / 13818.2
Standard-down success69 / 13850.433 / 13876.6
Passing-down success20 / 13886.117 / 13888.3
Pass PPA26 / 13881.882 / 13840.9
Rush PPA92 / 13833.620 / 13886.1
Pass explosiveness57 / 13859.18 / 13894.9
Rush explosiveness81 / 13841.6136 / 1381.5
Line yards113 / 13818.21 / 138100.0
Second-level yards95 / 13831.4T57 / 13858.8
Open-field yards73 / 13847.497 / 13829.9
Stuff rate122 / 13811.71 / 138100.0
Power successT45 / 13867.5T30 / 13878.5
HavocT49 / 13863.52 / 13899.3
Front-seven havocT113 / 13817.21 / 138100.0
DB havoc6 / 13896.4T88 / 13835.4
Points / opportunity30 / 13878.8T28 / 13879.9
Average field positionT44 / 13867.5T105 / 13823.7
Field-position expected points58 / 13858.4T100 / 13827.4

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Ethan Grunkemeyer · QBUsage 53.7% · Avg PPA 0.350 · Total 111.704
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.350111.70453.7%
Pass0.404112.76494.6%
Rush0.1997.54913.5%
1st down0.13015.18744.2%
2nd down0.26729.86156.9%
3rd down0.64452.80070.7%
Standard downs0.16331.86246.4%
Passing downs0.64479.84371.3%
Que'Sean Brown · WRUsage 11.8% · Avg PPA 0.483 · Total 33.834
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48333.83411.8%
Pass0.46431.09022.7%
Rush0.9152.7441.1%
1st down0.48812.6919.8%
2nd down0.45614.13815.7%
3rd down0.90010.79810.3%
Standard downs0.29112.78410.5%
Passing downs0.81021.05014.9%
Luke Reynolds · TEUsage 11.1% · Avg PPA 0.562 · Total 37.102
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56237.10211.1%
Pass0.69743.91221.4%
Rush-2.270-6.8101.1%
1st down0.2214.4277.5%
2nd down0.40710.17812.7%
3rd down0.91814.68813.8%
Standard downs0.35413.4529.0%
Passing downs0.84523.65016.1%
Bryce Baker · QBUsage 11.0% · Avg PPA 0.192 · Total 3.462
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1923.46211.0%
Pass0.0310.47219.2%
Rush0.9972.9903.8%
1st down0.0820.4116.8%
2nd down1.0907.62712.7%
3rd down-0.112-0.55916.7%
Standard downs0.1071.1828.9%
Passing downs0.3262.28017.9%
Darius Taylor · RBUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.251 · Total 1.253
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2511.2536.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2511.25312.2%
1st down-0.542-1.0845.3%
2nd down0.7711.5417.7%
3rd down0.7960.79612.5%
Standard downs0.2450.9796.0%
Passing downs0.2750.27514.3%
Jeffrey Overton Jr. · RBUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.475 · Total 14.246
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47514.2465.8%
Pass0.47514.24611.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1872.4275.7%
2nd down0.5947.1267.0%
3rd down0.9394.6934.6%
Standard downs0.2954.7254.5%
Passing downs0.6809.5218.4%
Ayden Greene · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.892 · Total 23.188
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.89223.1885.0%
Pass0.89223.18810.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3934.3244.7%
2nd down0.8214.9283.5%
3rd down1.54813.9368.9%
Standard downs0.6099.7454.4%
Passing downs1.34413.4436.5%
Messiah Mickens · RBUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.158 · Total 1.103
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1581.1034.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1581.1038.8%
1st down0.4411.7635.5%
2nd down-0.807-1.6143.6%
3rd down0.9540.9543.3%
Standard downs0.1581.1035.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
A.J. Brand · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.885 · Total 2.654
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8852.6544.1%
Pass0.0170.0173.2%
Rush1.3192.6384.9%
1st down0.9380.9382.6%
2nd down1.7001.7003.8%
3rd down0.0170.01712.5%
Standard downs1.3192.6383.0%
Passing downs0.0170.01714.3%
Keylen Adams · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA -1.446 · Total -4.339
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.446-4.3394.1%
Pass-1.446-4.3399.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.160-0.1602.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.163-0.16312.5%
Standard downs-2.088-4.1773.0%
Passing downs-0.163-0.16314.3%
Marlion Jackson · WRUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.341 · Total 4.436
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3414.4363.5%
Pass0.3414.4367.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2481.4873.6%
2nd down0.5153.0905.0%
3rd down-0.141-0.1411.3%
Standard downs-0.235-2.1163.5%
Passing downs1.6386.5523.4%
Tyler Mason · RBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA -0.107 · Total -0.536
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.107-0.5363.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.107-0.5366.3%
1st down-0.079-0.3175.5%
2nd down-0.219-0.2191.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.079-0.3173.2%
Passing downs-0.219-0.2192.6%
Davion Brown · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.723 · Total 13.018
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.72313.0183.0%
Pass0.72313.0186.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2791.3961.9%
2nd down0.5864.1033.6%
3rd down1.2537.5205.2%
Standard downs0.0750.5991.9%
Passing downs1.24212.4195.7%
Chanz Wiggins · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 1.312 · Total 2.624
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.3122.6242.7%
Pass1.3122.6246.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3122.6245.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.3122.6243.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
John Buetow · RBUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.746 · Total 1.492
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7461.4922.7%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.7461.4924.9%
1st down1.0521.0522.6%
2nd down0.4400.4403.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.7461.4923.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Pierce Petersohn · TEUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA -0.305 · Total -0.610
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.305-0.6102.7%
Pass-0.305-0.6106.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.401-0.4013.8%
3rd down-0.210-0.21012.5%
Standard downs-0.210-0.2101.5%
Passing downs-0.401-0.40114.3%
Benji Gosnell · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA -0.187 · Total -2.240
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.187-2.2402.6%
Pass-0.187-2.2405.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.342-1.7092.6%
2nd down-0.224-1.1193.3%
3rd down0.2940.5882.1%
Standard downs-0.154-1.0752.3%
Passing downs-0.233-1.1653.3%
Marcellous Hawkins · RBUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.071 · Total 0.782
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0710.7822.5%
Pass0.0710.7824.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0100.0492.6%
2nd down-0.227-1.1343.5%
3rd down1.8671.8671.1%
Standard downs-0.160-0.9582.0%
Passing downs0.3481.7403.4%
Tyseer Denmark · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA -0.114 · Total -1.137
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.114-1.1372.2%
Pass0.1591.2763.6%
Rush-1.206-2.4130.9%
1st down-0.450-1.7982.0%
2nd down0.1650.8243.3%
3rd down-0.164-0.1641.1%
Standard downs-0.009-0.0742.6%
Passing downs-0.531-1.0631.4%
Ja'Ricous Hairston · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.893 · Total 7.147
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8937.1472.1%
Pass0.8937.1474.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8061.6121.2%
2nd down0.1460.4372.4%
3rd down1.0702.1402.7%
Standard downs1.0127.0862.7%
Passing downs0.0620.0620.9%
Where Virginia Tech sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.194 (68th percentile; 138 teams)68thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.448 (63rd percentile; 138 teams)63rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.255 (60th percentile; 138 teams)60thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.371 (82nd percentile; 138 teams)82ndOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.053 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.034 (65th percentile; 138 teams)65thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.360 (83rd percentile; 138 teams)83rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.312 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.241 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99th
Values and percentiles
Virginia Tech metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.19468th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.44863rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.25560th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.37182nd138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.05334th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.03465th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.36083rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.31218th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.24199th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 277 attempts charted. Average depth of target 6.5 yards (2nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 7.0 per completion. Completion 71.8%, 8.2 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.42.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense70.1%64.1%+5.9244 / 277
Defense allowed66.2%64.2%+2.0219 / 237

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Virginia Tech.

Target mix by zone, Virginia Tech offense
Short left35% · 96Short middle19% · 52Short right36% · 97Deep left3% · 7Deep middle2% · 5Deep right6% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Virginia Tech passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense277100%6.57.071.8%0.42+5.9 pp244
Passing defense23799%7.35.565.4%0.30+2.0 pp219

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3023.847.2%0.163.001.101.0017.2%76.1%
Defense allowed2483.033.8%-0.011.900.901.4030.6%64.3%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense297 / 302902122312120264 / 267 · 98.9%
Defense allowed239 / 2482361226130217 / 219 · 99.1%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +5.9 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-7.35.017.3W1W2W2 vs Old Dominion: +9.3 ppW3W3 vs Maryland: +17.3 ppW4W4 vs Boston College: -4.7 ppW5W5 vs Pittsburgh: +12.8 ppW6W6 vs California: +2.7 ppW7W7 vs Georgia Tech: +7.3 ppW8W8 vs Clemson: -7.3 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1VMI320———5.70.34406.90.62
W2Old Dominion444472.7%63.4%+9.3 pp6.00.59422.10.03
W3Maryland393979.5%62.2%+17.3 pp7.50.66363.60.26
W4Boston College353562.9%67.5%-4.7 pp5.5-0.10425.50.06
W5Pittsburgh414173.2%60.3%+12.8 pp10.00.46322.0-0.21
W6California313066.7%63.9%+2.7 pp7.30.44333.40.10
W7Georgia Tech222268.2%60.9%+7.3 pp7.00.90404.20.23
W8Clemson333363.6%70.9%-7.3 pp2.80.19371.90.07

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

29 punts · 42.1 gross yards/punt · 36.1 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 29/29 punts. Known net yards: 22/29 punts.

Our punt returns

16 returns · 19.1 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

2 muffs · 2 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 16/16 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Clemson545.435.54/5
Week 7 · Georgia Tech442.850.52/4
Week 6 · California538.833.34/5
Week 5 · Pittsburgh436.327.34/4
Week 4 · Boston College543.040.03/5
Team style
Rating history