Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

UTEP

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

UTEP's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 136 across 8 systems; best 134, worst 137, so they disagree by 3 places.

Lab EPA
#137
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#134
up 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#134
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#136
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#136
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#137
up 1 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#134
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#137
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#129 of 138
Schedule strength
#48 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#104 of 138
Game control
#127 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#136 of 138
Offense
#136 of 138
Defense
#130 of 138
Special teams
#134 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

UTEP · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

1-6 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.253 net EPA/play

#137

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-16.91 points

#134 · Up 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -18.64 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -1.56, schedule #56 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +2.00. That is worth -20.20 on its own; the preseason prior of -7.01 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -16.91.

How each game enters this SRS rating

UTEP · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Oklahoma
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856664
-51.00 → -35.00+2.500.76379.52%+6.47-3.0950.616-2.479
Week 2 · Texas Southern
home · 2026-09-13 · ID 401864505
+41.00 → +35.00-2.500.79379.90%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.217-2.4750.742
Week 3 · Michigan
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858450
-35.00 → -35.00+2.500.824910.29%+6.07-3.3430.625-2.718
Week 4 · Oregon State
home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401860895
-26.00 → -26.00-2.500.857210.69%+7.09-3.0470.758-2.288
Week 5 · New Mexico
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401864514
-54.00 → -35.00+2.500.890911.11%+8.10-3.6110.900-2.711
Week 6 · Nevada
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401864517
-17.00 → -17.00-2.500.925911.55%-4.87-2.252-0.562-2.814
Week 7 · San José State
home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401864523
-13.00 → -13.00-2.500.962212.00%-8.63-1.860-1.036-2.896

Game terms -15.16 points; prior term -1.75 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -16.91 points. The preseason prior is -7.01 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-24.5 SP+ points

#134 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-26.58 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#137 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -11.12 on 268 plays; defense 15.45 on 315 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks UTEP 3 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
1-6 · conf 0-3 · home 1-3 · away 0-3 · expected wins 1.1
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 1-6 ATS (-7.9 avg) · 2025: 3-9 ATS (-2.5 avg)
Head coach
Scotty Walden · hired 2023-12-04 · 5-19 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #83 (163 pts) · 2025 #70 (180 pts) · 2026 #92 (180 pts)
Returning
-1% of production · 10% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing18%3%
Receiving15%14%
Rushing-31%14%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back153.000.840512.61
Defensive Line173.000.839914.28
Linebacker73.000.83505.84
Offensive Line162.880.823913.18
Quarterback53.000.83354.17
Receiver162.880.834413.35
Running Back53.000.83514.18
Special Teams32.670.82732.48

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Raymond Moore III · QB

CFBD athlete 5232049. Morgan State (2025–2025); UTEP (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.0238632.7%
Pass 45.2% · Rush 23.5%

1st 30.6% · 2nd 31.8% · 3rd 34.4%

Standard downs 29.8% · Passing downs 38.2%

Not linked
EJ Colson · QB

CFBD athlete 5141395. UCF (2024–2024); UTEP (2026–2026); Incarnate Word (2025–2025)

Passing WEPA0.2396942.6%
Pass 62.8% · Rush 28.5%

1st 41.8% · 2nd 41.5% · 3rd 47.4%

Standard downs 44.3% · Passing downs 39.2%

2024: 3★ · 0.8819
Raymond Moore III · QB

CFBD athlete 5232049. Morgan State (2025–2025); UTEP (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1954932.7%
Pass 45.2% · Rush 23.5%

1st 30.6% · 2nd 31.8% · 3rd 34.4%

Standard downs 29.8% · Passing downs 38.2%

Not linked
EJ Colson · QB

CFBD athlete 5141395. UCF (2024–2024); UTEP (2026–2026); Incarnate Word (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1284042.6%
Pass 62.8% · Rush 28.5%

1st 41.8% · 2nd 41.5% · 3rd 47.4%

Standard downs 44.3% · Passing downs 39.2%

2024: 3★ · 0.8819
Tavorus Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 4685418. Missouri (2022–2025); UTEP (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0944018.0%
Pass 5.4% · Rush 29.6%

1st 20.5% · 2nd 18.3% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 20.9% · Passing downs 12.2%

2022: 4★ · 0.9319
Carlos Arrelola · PK

CFBD athlete 5296572. UTEP (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-7.6908—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Bodey Weaver · QB

CFBD athlete 5327568. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.1%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Braesen Leon · QB

CFBD athlete 5390014. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Carmelo Taylor · WR

CFBD athlete 5079056. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Carver Cheeks · WR

CFBD athlete 5168770. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 16.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 8.1%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 7.0%

Not linked
Cash Cheeks · TE

CFBD athlete 5172260. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 8.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.8% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 10.6%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Chris Hunter · RB

CFBD athlete 5390016. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 1.3% · Rush 6.9%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 5.1%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Elijah McCoy · RB

CFBD athlete 5221272. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 6.0%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Jackson Stoner · TE

CFBD athlete 5268744. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jaden Moore · RB

CFBD athlete 5390015. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 10.3%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 5.8% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 9.4%

Not linked
Jaden Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 4877714. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 19.9% · Rush 1.4%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 14.4%

Standard downs 8.1% · Passing downs 12.5%

Not linked
Jaylan Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5196350. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 8.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Jeremiah Nash · WR

CFBD athlete 5390023. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.5%

1st 5.2% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Kam Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 4879292. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.1%
Pass 17.3% · Rush 2.7%

1st 9.0% · 2nd 9.9% · 3rd 7.8%

Standard downs 7.5% · Passing downs 12.0%

Not linked
Lamar Sperling · RB

CFBD athlete 5091891. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 11.0%

1st 11.4% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 8.3% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Marcus Torres · WR

CFBD athlete 5197115. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 10.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Nik Henry · WR

CFBD athlete 5223789. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 1.6%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 1.1%

Not linked
Royal Capell · WR

CFBD athlete 5141402. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 11.3% · Rush 1.1%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 5.7%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 3.9%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 21 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brady Braun · PGardner-Webb2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Brian Williams Jr. · IOLJackson State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cade Hechter · KUT Martin2026-01-31— / —Immediate
Carson Loeb · LSNot reported2026-02-01— / —Immediate
Donavan Howard · SVirginia State2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
EJ Colson · QBIncarnate Word2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Elijah Fields · DLStephen F. Austin2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Esteban Guillory · SWestern Illinois2026-01-092★ / —Immediate
Isaiah Bogerty · LBTexas Southern2026-01-183★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jackson Bradley · IOLCornell2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jaymon Lamb · OTNorth Texas2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kaleb Miles · CBEast Texas A&M2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
LaTristan Thompson · CBUtah2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Lamar Sperling · RBBuffalo2026-02-033★ / 0.8300Immediate
Omoruyi Aliu-Otokiti · IOLLivingstone2026-01-133★ / 0.8200Immediate
Parker Cushing · KNot reported2026-01-13— / —Immediate
Preston Hickey · DLNorthwestern State2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Raymond Moore III · QBMorgan State2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Royal Capell · WROklahoma State2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Sterling Miles · EDGEEastern Michigan2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tavorus Jones · RBMissouri2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 20 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Allan McCarter · DLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Ashten Emory · RBCalifornia2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ashton Coker · DLNot reported2026-01-153★ / —Withdrawn
Dennis Lafferty · OTNot reported2026-01-03— / —Immediate
Elijah Baldwin · EDGEUTSA2026-01-073★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jake Riggs · IOLNot reported2025-12-233★ / —Immediate
Jake Utley · OTNot reported2025-12-062★ / —Immediate
James Williams · IOLNew Mexico State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justin Content · CBNot reported2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Withdrawn
Kenny Odom · WRSouth Florida2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Malachi Nelson · QBSyracuse2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mark Robinson · OTKentucky2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Marquez Taylor · RBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Skyler Locklear · QBMissouri State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Stratton Shufelt · LBMissouri State2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Toric Goins Jr. · WRNot reported2026-01-022★ / —Immediate
Tyrone McDuffie · IOLNorthwestern State2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Udoka Ezeani · EDGENorth Texas2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Will Weber · DLSacramento State2026-01-203★ / 0.8000Immediate
Wondame Davis Jr. · WRWake Forest2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at UTEP. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Scotty Walden · career 6–22 across 4 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 21 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Scotty Walden · active at capture

    5–19 · 24 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2018–2023 · Dana Dimel

    20–49 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2017-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2017–2017 · Mike Price

    0–7 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2013–2017 · Sean Kugler

    18–36 · 54 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2012-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2004–2012 · Mike Price

    48–61 · 109 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Hired 2003-12-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2000–2003 · Gary Nord

    14–34 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 1999-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1993–1999 · Charlie Bailey

    19–53–1 · 73 attributed games · 7 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1989–1993 · David Lee

    11–41–1 · 53 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1986–1988 · Bob Stull

    21–15 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1982–1985 · Bill Yung

    7–39 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1981–1981 · Billy Alton

    1–8 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1977–1981 · Bill Michael

    5–43 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1974–1976 · Gil Bartosh

    6–28 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1973–1973 · Tommy Hudspeth

    0–11 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1965–1972 · Robert Dobbs

    41–35–2 · 78 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1963–1964 · Warren Harper

    3–15–2 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1962–1962 · Bum Phillips

    4–5 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1957–1961 · Ben Collins

    18–29–1 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1950–1956 · Mike Brumbelow

    46–24–3 · 73 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1946–1949 · Jack Curtice

    24–13–3 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1935–1941 · Mack Saxon

    32–28–5 · 65 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Scotty Walden · incomplete attribution0–0——-24.6-21.692—
2025 · Scotty Walden2–101–70–0-17.5-17.770—
2024 · Scotty Walden3–93–50–0-22.7-20.283—
2023 · Dana Dimel3–92–60–0-16.2-13.7121—
2022 · Dana Dimel5–73–50–0-10.7-11.3129—
2021 · Dana Dimel7–64–40–1-4.2-6.7134—
2020 · Dana Dimel3–50–40–0-18.6-17.2131—
2019 · Dana Dimel1–110–80–0-25.6-28.1112—
2018 · Dana Dimel1–111–70–0-26.6-24.7129—
2017 · Sean Kugler · incomplete attribution0–5——-27.4-28.9133—
2017 · Mike Price · incomplete attribution0–7——-27.4-28.9133—
2016 · Sean Kugler4–82–60–0-16.1-21.3125—
2015 · Sean Kugler5–73–50–0-19.5-22.4128—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-19 18:30:36 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play137 / 1380.7132 / 1384.4
Success rate134 / 1382.9127 / 1388.0
Explosiveness21 / 13885.478 / 13843.8
Standard-down success133 / 1383.6126 / 1388.8
Passing-down success133 / 1383.6T116 / 13815.7
Pass PPA136 / 1381.5137 / 1380.7
Rush PPA120 / 13813.1123 / 13810.9
Pass explosiveness39 / 13872.392 / 13833.6
Rush explosiveness19 / 13886.992 / 13833.6
Line yards128 / 1387.395 / 13831.4
Second-level yards33 / 13876.680 / 13842.3
Open-field yards29 / 13879.6105 / 13824.1
Stuff rate121 / 13812.479 / 13843.1
Power success122 / 13811.7T106 / 13822.6
Havoc137 / 1380.7128 / 1387.3
Front-seven havoc137 / 1380.7T88 / 13835.4
DB havocT19 / 13885.8T136 / 1381.1
Points / opportunity138 / 1380.0123 / 13810.9
Average field positionT67 / 13851.5T122 / 13810.6
Field-position expected pointsT92 / 13832.8123 / 13810.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

EJ Colson · QBUsage 42.6% · Avg PPA -0.017 · Total -2.647
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.017-2.64742.6%
Pass0.0565.51062.8%
Rush-0.143-8.15728.5%
1st down-0.156-9.97441.8%
2nd down-0.020-0.95841.5%
3rd down0.1746.25547.4%
Standard downs0.0667.12444.3%
Passing downs-0.208-9.77139.2%
Raymond Moore III · QBUsage 32.7% · Avg PPA -0.185 · Total -25.158
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.185-25.15832.7%
Pass-0.346-29.04545.2%
Rush0.0753.88723.5%
1st down-0.428-22.70830.6%
2nd down0.0040.15331.8%
3rd down0.1845.71734.4%
Standard downs-0.411-33.28229.8%
Passing downs0.1488.12438.2%
Tavorus Jones · RBUsage 18.0% · Avg PPA 0.030 · Total 1.936
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0301.93618.0%
Pass0.0590.5345.4%
Rush0.0251.40229.6%
1st down-0.011-0.34820.5%
2nd down0.2054.31218.3%
3rd down-0.347-4.16115.4%
Standard downs0.1246.18120.9%
Passing downs-0.283-4.24512.2%
Jaden Smith · WRUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA 0.398 · Total 15.922
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.39815.9229.6%
Pass0.37213.76119.9%
Rush0.7202.1611.4%
1st down0.0540.7067.5%
2nd down0.5207.28610.6%
3rd down0.6107.92914.4%
Standard downs0.3136.8958.1%
Passing downs0.5029.02712.5%
Kam Thomas · RBUsage 9.1% · Avg PPA 0.141 · Total 4.497
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1414.4979.1%
Pass0.2586.96717.3%
Rush-0.494-2.4702.7%
1st down0.3454.4809.0%
2nd down0.0020.0239.9%
3rd down1.0006.0027.8%
Standard downs0.1592.6987.5%
Passing downs0.1201.79912.0%
Lamar Sperling · RBUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA -0.032 · Total -0.670
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.032-0.6707.1%
Pass0.1570.6292.9%
Rush-0.076-1.29811.0%
1st down-0.186-2.60411.4%
2nd down0.1970.7864.3%
3rd down-0.268-0.5363.1%
Standard downs-0.119-1.9088.3%
Passing downs0.2481.2384.8%
Carver Cheeks · WRUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA 0.165 · Total 3.799
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1653.7996.9%
Pass0.1653.79916.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2052.2508.0%
2nd down-0.024-0.0973.8%
3rd down1.3708.2218.1%
Standard downs0.6069.0846.9%
Passing downs-0.661-5.2847.0%
Jaden Moore · RBUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA -0.303 · Total -2.729
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.303-2.7295.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.303-2.72910.3%
1st down-0.487-1.4624.3%
2nd down-0.321-0.9635.8%
3rd down-0.101-0.3047.7%
Standard downs-0.487-1.4622.8%
Passing downs-0.211-1.2679.4%
Royal Capell · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.265 · Total 2.122
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2652.1225.0%
Pass0.3632.54211.3%
Rush-0.419-0.4191.1%
1st down0.0970.2904.5%
2nd down0.3800.7603.8%
3rd down-0.481-0.9615.7%
Standard downs0.5143.0835.5%
Passing downs-0.481-0.9613.9%
Marcus Torres · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.041 · Total 0.082
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0410.0824.3%
Pass0.0410.08210.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.060-0.0605.6%
2nd down0.1420.1426.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.060-0.0603.8%
Passing downs0.1420.1424.8%
Chris Hunter · RBUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA -0.072 · Total -0.501
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.072-0.5014.1%
Pass-0.137-0.1371.3%
Rush-0.061-0.3656.9%
1st down-0.354-1.0614.3%
2nd down0.3610.7223.8%
3rd down-0.081-0.1635.1%
Standard downs-0.354-1.0612.8%
Passing downs0.1400.5596.3%
Elijah McCoy · RBUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA -0.329 · Total -2.302
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.329-2.3023.9%
Pass-0.586-0.5861.4%
Rush-0.286-1.7166.0%
1st down-0.523-1.5704.1%
2nd down-0.711-1.4213.5%
3rd down0.3450.6905.3%
Standard downs-0.356-1.7784.1%
Passing downs-0.262-0.5243.5%
Cash Cheeks · TEUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 1.173 · Total 14.076
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.17314.0763.8%
Pass1.17314.0768.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.0702.0700.8%
2nd down-0.135-0.4063.0%
3rd down1.3569.49310.6%
Standard downs1.4788.8692.8%
Passing downs0.8685.2075.9%
Jeremiah Nash · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA -0.898 · Total -12.571
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.898-12.5713.8%
Pass-0.105-1.3608.3%
Rush-11.212-11.2120.5%
1st down-1.918-15.3425.2%
2nd down-0.011-0.0332.5%
3rd down-0.588-1.1762.6%
Standard downs-1.818-16.3613.7%
Passing downs0.7583.7904.2%
Jaylan Brown · WRUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA -1.225 · Total -6.127
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.225-6.1273.1%
Pass-1.225-6.1278.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.305-0.9144.5%
2nd down-1.065-1.0651.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.265-5.0623.6%
Passing downs-1.065-1.0652.0%
Nik Henry · WRUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 1.110 · Total 7.771
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.1107.7712.8%
Pass0.5502.7514.3%
Rush2.5105.0191.6%
1st down-0.090-0.2703.0%
2nd down1.5113.0222.6%
3rd down2.7492.7491.8%
Standard downs1.2147.2813.8%
Passing downs0.4890.4891.1%
Bodey Weaver · QBUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.215 · Total -0.215
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.215-0.2151.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.215-0.2153.1%
1st down-0.215-0.2154.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.215-0.2153.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Braesen Leon · QBUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA 2.532 · Total 2.532
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.5322.5321.9%
Pass2.5322.5325.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down2.5322.5325.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs2.5322.5323.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jackson Stoner · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.289 · Total 0.289
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2890.2891.7%
Pass0.2890.2894.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2890.2894.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2890.2892.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Carmelo Taylor · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.075 · Total 0.075
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0750.0751.5%
Pass0.0750.0753.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0750.0753.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0750.0752.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where UTEP sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.108 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.346 (3rd percentile; 138 teams)3rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.329 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: -0.144 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.025 (13th percentile; 138 teams)13thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.250 (4th percentile; 138 teams)4thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.466 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.236 (44th percentile; 138 teams)44thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.121 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7th
Values and percentiles
UTEP metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.1081st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.3463rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.32985th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play-0.1441st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.02513th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.2504th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.4668th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.23644th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.1217th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 157 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.5 yards (46th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.2 per completion. Completion 64.3%, 6.8 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.00.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense65.8%62.6%+3.2117 / 157
Defense allowed67.2%59.3%+7.9128 / 173

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is UTEP.

Target mix by zone, UTEP offense
Short left44% · 67Short middle13% · 20Short right30% · 45Deep left4% · 6Deep middle4% · 6Deep right5% · 8

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
UTEP passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense15799%8.55.264.3%0.00+3.2 pp117
Passing defense17399%9.16.165.3%0.48+7.9 pp128

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2543.837.9%0.072.801.201.5019.6%61.9%
Defense allowed2725.046.3%0.223.101.101.4015.4%77.8%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense246 / 254246835000218 / 219 · 99.5%
Defense allowed265 / 272255178550259 / 259 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +3.2 pp. 5 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-13.5-1.410.8W1W2W3W3 vs Michigan: +6.8 ppW4W4 vs Oregon State: +7.5 ppW5W5 vs New Mexico: -13.5 ppW6W6 vs Nevada: -1.1 ppW7W7 vs San José State: +10.8 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Oklahoma180———11.0-0.04382.8-0.31
W2Texas Southern210———8.20.29337.60.28
W3Michigan151471.4%64.6%+6.8 pp7.6-0.28321.8-0.19
W4Oregon State252572.0%64.5%+7.5 pp6.20.11412.2-0.21
W5New Mexico181844.4%58.0%-13.5 pp12.3-0.85355.00.26
W6Nevada262661.5%62.6%-1.1 pp7.3-0.03253.50.21
W7San José State343473.5%62.7%+10.8 pp8.40.38503.60.43

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

34 punts · 41.0 gross yards/punt · 34.4 net yards/punt

8 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 34/34 punts. Known net yards: 27/34 punts.

Our punt returns

5 returns · 5.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 5/5 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · San José State438.332.73/4
Week 6 · Nevada944.340.45/9
Week 5 · New Mexico235.535.52/2
Week 4 · Oregon State549.446.04/5
Week 3 · Michigan632.532.25/6
Team style
Rating history