Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

UNLV

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

UNLV's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 76.5 across 8 systems; best 69, worst 85, so they disagree by 16 places.

Lab EPA
#71
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#75
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#82
up 82026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#69
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#78
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#78
up 3 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#85
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#71
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#83 of 138
Schedule strength
#117 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#87 of 138
Game control
#85 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#89 of 138
Offense
#103 of 138
Defense
#54 of 138
Special teams
#115 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

UNLV · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.010 net EPA/play

#71

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-0.87 points

#75 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +1.37 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -2.64, schedule #67 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth -1.27 on its own; the preseason prior of +0.33 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -0.87.

How each game enters this SRS rating

UNLV · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Memphis
home · 2026-08-30 · ID 401862693
-6.00 → -6.00-2.500.76379.60%+2.46-0.8160.236-0.580
Week 1 · Hawai'i
away · 2026-09-06 · ID 401864497
+15.00 → +15.00+2.500.76379.60%-7.391.680-0.7100.970
Week 2 · North Texas
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862705
-38.00 → -35.00+2.500.79379.97%+5.88-3.2420.587-2.655
Week 4 · Akron
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864512
+28.00 → +28.00+2.500.857210.77%-16.433.286-1.7701.516
Week 5 · California
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858247
+8.00 → +8.00-2.500.890911.20%-7.100.616-0.795-0.179
Week 6 · North Dakota State
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401864518
+6.00 → +6.00-2.500.925911.64%+5.920.4070.6891.096
Week 7 · Air Force
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401864524
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.962212.09%-1.75-0.907-0.212-1.119

Game terms -0.95 points; prior term +0.08 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -0.87 points. The preseason prior is +0.33 with 25.13% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-2.2 SP+ points

#82 · Up 8 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-3.51 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#78 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -4.09 on 439 plays; defense -0.59 on 442 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks UNLV 4 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 2-1 · home 2-1 · away 2-2 · expected wins 3.7
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-3 ATS (-3.1 avg) · 2025: 7-7 ATS (+1.6 avg)
Head coach
Dan Mullen · hired 2024-12-12 · 10-4 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #76 (168 pts) · 2025 #95 (154 pts) · 2026 #63 (196 pts)
Returning
15% of production · 27% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing4%1%
Receiving14%29%
Rushing31%51%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back103.000.83748.37
Defensive Line133.000.842610.95
Linebacker83.000.84676.77
Offensive Line153.000.841612.62
Quarterback43.000.85113.40
Receiver83.000.85706.86
Running Back43.000.84303.37
Special Teams83.000.84256.74

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Jackson Arnold · QB

CFBD athlete 4870607. Auburn (2025–2025); Oklahoma (2023–2024); UNLV (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.33320360.2%
Pass 97.5% · Rush 34.9%

1st 50.0% · 2nd 56.7% · 3rd 86.5%

Standard downs 53.7% · Passing downs 73.1%

2023: 5★ · 0.9963
Jai'Den Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 5125754. UNLV (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.08211329.9%
Pass 16.0% · Rush 42.6%

1st 36.8% · 2nd 33.3% · 3rd 14.4%

Standard downs 32.1% · Passing downs 25.6%

2023: stars unavailable
Jackson Arnold · QB

CFBD athlete 4870607. Auburn (2025–2025); Oklahoma (2023–2024); UNLV (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3119760.2%
Pass 97.5% · Rush 34.9%

1st 50.0% · 2nd 56.7% · 3rd 86.5%

Standard downs 53.7% · Passing downs 73.1%

2023: 5★ · 0.9963
Ramon Villela · PK

CFBD athlete 5155186. UNLV (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR-0.7008—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Ethan Schwartz · P

CFBD athlete 5389947. UNLV (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR2.4601—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Alex Orji · QB

CFBD athlete 4685495. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 3.9%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Amorion Walker · WR

CFBD athlete 4702755. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Darrien Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5125730. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 5.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
DeAngelo Irvin Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5125768. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 9.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Jae Beasley II · TE

CFBD athlete 5145523. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jaylon Glover · RB

CFBD athlete 4808744. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.7%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 14.2%

1st 10.0% · 2nd 12.1% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 11.7% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Kamran Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 5141714. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.3%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Kayden McGee · WR

CFBD athlete 5149831. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 11.1% · Rush 3.1%

1st 8.6% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
Keyan Burnett · TE

CFBD athlete 4685289. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 13.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 8.7%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Matt Byrnes · TE

CFBD athlete 4872961. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Mohammad Maali · RB

CFBD athlete 5295302. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Peyton Zachary · WR

CFBD athlete 5161009. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
Skylar Vann · RB

CFBD athlete 5389943. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 9.1%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Taeshaun Lyons · WR

CFBD athlete 4940235. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 10.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Tastean Reddicks · WR

CFBD athlete 4870965. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 14.9% · Rush 0.5%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 12.4%

Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 7.6%

Not linked
Tavian Mcnair · WR

CFBD athlete 5156153. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.7% · 2nd 2.7% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Troy Stellato · WR

CFBD athlete 4587722. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 6.8% · Rush 0.7%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Velltray Jefferson · TE

CFBD athlete 5295314. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Vincent Carner · WR

CFBD athlete 5291092. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 7.2%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 16 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amorion Walker · WRMiddle Tennessee2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cam Santee · LBHoly Cross2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Colton Thomasson · OTBaylor2026-01-074★ / —Immediate
Dee Crayton · LBClemson2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Griffin Scroggs · IOLApp State2026-01-233★ / 0.8500Immediate
Herb Gray · DLTennessee2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Arnold · QBAuburn2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Brown · IOLPittsburgh2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Joe Metzger · IOLHoly Cross2026-03-253★ / 0.8200Withdrawn
Keyan Burnett · TEArizona2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kyron Chambers · CBSMU2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Landyn Cleveland · SOklahoma State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mark Iheanachor · LBSMU2026-01-253★ / 0.8500Immediate
Matthew Choules · PKennesaw State2026-01-16— / —Immediate
Taz Reddicks · WROregon State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Troy Stellato · WRKentucky2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 15 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Andrew Powdrell · CBWest Virginia2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Anthony Colandrea · QBNebraska2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Cameron Brown · PMichigan2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Carter Jula · PFlorida State2026-01-19— / —Immediate
Gael Ochoa · QBRice2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Isaiah Patterson · LBWest Virginia2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaden Bradley · WRNot reported2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Justin Flowe · LBNot reported2026-04-045★ / —Withdrawn
Kodi DeCambra · SHawai'i2026-01-074★ / —Immediate
Lucas Conti · DLNot reported2026-01-063★ / —Withdrawn
Nijrell Eason II · CBNot reported2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Sam Wolfenden · LSTemple2026-01-143★ / 0.8000Immediate
Troy Omeire · WRNew Mexico2026-01-233★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tunmise Adeleye · DLSyracuse2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Yasir Muhammad · CBNot reported2026-01-063★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at UNLV. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Dan Mullen · career 113–65 across 15 seasons and 3 schools

Tenure timeline · 12 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Dan Mullen · active at capture

    10–4 · 14 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2023–2024 · Barry Odom

    20–8 · 28 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2020–2022 · Marcus Arroyo

    7–23 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2019-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2015–2019 · Tony Sanchez

    20–40 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2014-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2010–2014 · Bobby Hauck

    15–49 · 64 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2009-12-22. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2005–2009 · Mike Sanford Sr.

    16–43 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1999–2004 · John Robinson

    28–42 · 70 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1994–1998 · Jeff Horton

    13–44 · 57 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1990–1993 · Jim Strong

    17–27 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1986–1989 · Wayne Nunnely

    19–25 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1982–1985 · Harvey Hyde

    26–19–1 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1978–1981 · Tony Knap

    29–15–2 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Dan Mullen · incomplete attribution0–0——-3.4-4.663—
2025 · Dan Mullen10–46–20–14.3-0.995—
2024 · Barry Odom11–36–21–09.37.27623
2023 · Barry Odom9–56–30–11.40.9136—
2022 · Marcus Arroyo5–73–50–0-11.9-10102—
2021 · Marcus Arroyo2–102–60–0-13.8-7.968—
2020 · Marcus Arroyo0–60–60–0-19.7-19.277—
2019 · Tony Sanchez4–82–60–0-17.4-16.5100—
2018 · Tony Sanchez4–82–60–0-11.1-14.799—
2017 · Tony Sanchez5–74–40–0-14.5-9.9117—
2016 · Tony Sanchez4–83–50–0-14.3-15.381—
2015 · Tony Sanchez3–92–60–0-16.2-15106—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-23 16:48:54 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play96 / 13830.770 / 13849.6
Success rateT122 / 13811.363 / 13854.7
Explosiveness60 / 13856.975 / 13846.0
Standard-down success120 / 13813.161 / 13856.2
Passing-down success111 / 13819.7T73 / 13847.1
Pass PPA85 / 13838.731 / 13878.1
Rush PPA97 / 13829.9112 / 13819.0
Pass explosiveness33 / 13876.6124 / 13810.2
Rush explosiveness76 / 13845.368 / 13851.1
Line yards67 / 13851.8135 / 1382.2
Second-level yards87 / 13837.2134 / 1382.9
Open-field yards56 / 13859.995 / 13831.4
Stuff rate43 / 13869.3128 / 1387.3
Power success73 / 13847.4T74 / 13846.0
HavocT90 / 13834.3T88 / 13835.8
Front-seven havocT84 / 13837.2T109 / 13820.1
DB havocT98 / 13828.8T40 / 13871.2
Points / opportunity114 / 13817.554 / 13861.3
Average field positionT76 / 13844.9T42 / 13869.3
Field-position expected points80 / 13842.358 / 13858.4

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Jackson Arnold · QBUsage 60.2% · Avg PPA 0.242 · Total 69.189
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.24269.18960.2%
Pass0.21942.74097.5%
Rush0.32128.85634.9%
1st down0.0818.28550.0%
2nd down0.19516.58356.7%
3rd down0.62456.16486.5%
Standard downs0.26444.69353.7%
Passing downs0.20924.49573.1%
Jai'Den Thomas · RBUsage 29.9% · Avg PPA 0.031 · Total 4.444
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0314.44429.9%
Pass0.1023.26416.0%
Rush0.0111.18042.6%
1st down0.0221.65836.8%
2nd down-0.136-6.80733.3%
3rd down0.2994.47814.4%
Standard downs0.11411.52132.1%
Passing downs-0.173-7.07725.6%
Jaylon Glover · RBUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA -0.613 · Total -11.650
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.613-11.6508.7%
Pass-0.019-0.0563.1%
Rush-0.725-11.59414.2%
1st down-0.105-0.94310.0%
2nd down-0.925-7.40012.1%
3rd down0.9160.9162.0%
Standard downs-0.565-9.61211.7%
Passing downs-1.019-2.0382.7%
Tastean Reddicks · WRUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.283 · Total 7.928
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2837.9286.8%
Pass0.44912.12914.9%
Rush-4.201-4.2010.5%
1st down0.3063.6696.8%
2nd down1.2956.4753.8%
3rd down-0.201-2.21612.4%
Standard downs0.67811.5266.4%
Passing downs-0.327-3.5987.6%
Kayden McGee · WRUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 1.002 · Total 26.044
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.00226.0446.3%
Pass1.44327.41211.1%
Rush-0.195-1.3683.1%
1st down0.3505.2448.6%
2nd down1.86711.2014.7%
3rd down2.76611.0644.3%
Standard downs0.3886.9816.7%
Passing downs2.38319.0635.5%
Keyan Burnett · TEUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.078 · Total 2.023
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0782.0235.5%
Pass0.0782.02313.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0010.0115.4%
2nd down-0.038-0.1913.3%
3rd down0.6766.0808.7%
Standard downs-0.293-5.5756.0%
Passing downs1.0857.5984.4%
Skylar Vann · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -0.280 · Total -0.839
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.280-0.8394.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.280-0.8399.1%
1st down-0.150-0.1503.4%
2nd down-0.344-0.6889.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.280-0.8396.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Taeshaun Lyons · WRUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.441 · Total 8.374
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4418.3744.6%
Pass0.4418.37410.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3311.9833.4%
2nd down0.1390.8324.5%
3rd down0.7945.5597.9%
Standard downs0.3913.5223.2%
Passing downs0.4854.8537.4%
Vincent Carner · WRUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.176 · Total 2.107
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1762.1074.5%
Pass0.1762.10710.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.725-2.9013.5%
2nd down0.3862.7058.2%
3rd down2.3032.3031.8%
Standard downs-0.606-3.6373.3%
Passing downs0.9575.7447.2%
Darrien Jones · RBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.266 · Total -5.311
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.266-5.3114.2%
Pass-0.085-0.5933.5%
Rush-0.363-4.7185.0%
1st down-0.293-1.1712.0%
2nd down-0.341-2.7315.3%
3rd down-0.176-1.4097.7%
Standard downs-0.450-4.9503.5%
Passing downs-0.040-0.3615.6%
DeAngelo Irvin Jr. · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA -0.203 · Total -1.220
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.203-1.2204.1%
Pass-0.203-1.2209.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.300-1.2006.6%
2nd down-1.326-1.3262.3%
3rd down1.3051.3053.1%
Standard downs-0.505-2.5265.4%
Passing downs1.3051.3051.9%
Alex Orji · QBUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA -0.353 · Total -4.236
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.353-4.2363.4%
Pass-0.871-3.4862.5%
Rush0.3212.2493.9%
1st down-0.904-2.7122.0%
2nd down0.3341.3383.6%
3rd down1.9983.9962.7%
Standard downs-0.484-3.3913.0%
Passing downs-0.169-0.8454.5%
Matt Byrnes · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.144 · Total 0.718
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1440.7183.2%
Pass0.1440.7186.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3420.3421.6%
2nd down-0.580-1.7396.3%
3rd down2.1162.1162.9%
Standard downs0.7262.1773.1%
Passing downs-0.729-1.4583.4%
Peyton Zachary · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.285 · Total -1.998
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.285-1.9983.2%
Pass-0.285-1.9986.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2310.4632.2%
2nd down0.0870.2614.3%
3rd down1.0721.0722.2%
Standard downs0.3320.9952.1%
Passing downs-0.748-2.9935.5%
Troy Stellato · WRUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.089 · Total 0.712
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0890.7123.1%
Pass0.7495.2456.8%
Rush-4.533-4.5330.7%
1st down0.8601.7211.8%
2nd down-1.131-4.5234.8%
3rd down1.7573.5153.6%
Standard downs0.2881.4382.9%
Passing downs-0.242-0.7253.4%
Kamran Williams · RBUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA -0.022 · Total -0.065
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.022-0.0652.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.022-0.0654.3%
1st down-0.012-0.0243.4%
2nd down-0.041-0.0412.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.022-0.0653.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tavian Mcnair · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 1.233 · Total 7.398
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2337.3981.7%
Pass1.2337.3983.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4030.4030.7%
2nd down1.7785.3342.7%
3rd down0.8301.6612.7%
Standard downs1.2582.5160.9%
Passing downs1.2204.8813.3%
Amorion Walker · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -3.890 · Total -3.890
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-3.890-3.8901.6%
Pass-3.890-3.8905.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-3.890-3.8902.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Mohammad Maali · RBUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.093 · Total -0.093
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.093-0.0931.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.093-0.0933.0%
1st down-0.093-0.0933.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.093-0.0932.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Velltray Jefferson · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.950 · Total 0.950
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9500.9501.6%
Pass0.9500.9505.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9500.9503.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.9500.9502.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jae Beasley II · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.741 · Total 2.222
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7412.2221.4%
Pass0.7412.2222.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.7412.2224.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.7412.2222.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where UNLV sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.077 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.379 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.248 (57th percentile; 138 teams)57thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.191 (39th percentile; 138 teams)39thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.050 (30th percentile; 138 teams)30thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.070 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.402 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.234 (46th percentile; 138 teams)46thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.149 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36th
Values and percentiles
UNLV metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.07731st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.37911th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.24857th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.19139th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.05030th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.07050th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.40255th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.23446th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14936th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 98% of 191 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.3 yards (86th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.0 per completion. Completion 57.6%, 7.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.23.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense57.8%57.8%-0.1187 / 191
Defense allowed54.6%60.4%-5.9207 / 209

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is UNLV.

Target mix by zone, UNLV offense
Short left25% · 46Short middle28% · 52Short right34% · 62Deep left4% · 8Deep middle4% · 7Deep right5% · 9

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
UNLV passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense19198%10.34.057.6%0.23-0.1 pp187
Passing defense20999%9.45.355.0%0.07-5.9 pp207

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2744.438.6%0.113.201.101.4013.9%72.0%
Defense allowed2624.946.7%0.173.501.301.2013.5%71.9%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense271 / 2742641016770251 / 251 · 100.0%
Defense allowed257 / 262255716220244 / 244 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -0.1 pp. 7 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-17.4-5.36.7W1W1 vs Memphis: +6.7 ppW1W1 vs Hawai'i: -17.4 ppW2W2 vs North Texas: +5.3 ppW4W4 vs Akron: +3.8 ppW5W5 vs California: -12.9 ppW6W6 vs North Dakota State: -6.9 ppW7W7 vs Air Force: +5.1 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Memphis383767.6%60.8%+6.7 pp8.40.14414.10.19
W1Hawai'i181844.4%61.8%-17.4 pp8.7-0.16435.80.36
W2North Texas333259.4%54.1%+5.3 pp12.60.06382.8-0.31
W4Akron292958.6%54.8%+3.8 pp13.40.70346.00.18
W5California242245.5%58.4%-12.9 pp8.30.33384.50.26
W6North Dakota State161650.0%56.9%-6.9 pp10.1-0.08483.70.01
W7Air Force333363.6%58.6%+5.1 pp9.80.42324.10.10

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

34 punts · 42.4 gross yards/punt · 38.9 net yards/punt

14 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 34/34 punts. Known net yards: 31/34 punts.

Our punt returns

6 returns · 8.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 6/6 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Air Force152.052.01/1
Week 6 · North Dakota State642.339.05/6
Week 5 · California737.334.06/7
Week 4 · Akron445.832.73/4
Week 2 · North Texas439.536.84/4
Team style
Rating history