Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

UCLA

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

UCLA's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 11.5 across 8 systems; best 6, worst 31, so they disagree by 25 places.

Lab EPA
#6
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#12
up 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#17
up 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#30
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#31
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#7
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#11
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#6
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#2 of 138
Schedule strength
#63 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#56 of 138
Game control
#13 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#18 of 138
Offense
#41 of 138
Defense
#10 of 138
Special teams
#86 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

UCLA · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

7-0 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.213 net EPA/play

#6

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

12.00 points

#12 · Up 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +16.12 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +0.53, schedule #37 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +16.65 on its own; the preseason prior of -2.26 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +12.00.

How each game enters this SRS rating

UCLA · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · California
away · 2026-09-06 · ID 401858210
+21.00 → +21.00+2.500.76379.40%-7.102.208-0.6671.541
Week 2 · San Diego State
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858443
+18.00 → +18.00-2.500.79379.77%-5.791.514-0.5650.948
Week 3 · Purdue
home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401858458
+14.00 → +14.00-2.500.824910.15%+0.881.1670.0891.256
Week 4 · Maryland
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858462
+51.00 → +35.00+2.500.857210.55%-4.713.955-0.4973.458
Week 6 · Oregon
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858484
+2.00 → +2.00+2.500.925911.39%+8.550.5130.9741.487
Week 7 · Wisconsin
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858494
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.962211.84%+8.970.8881.0621.950
Week 8 · Michigan State
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858499
+18.00 → +18.00-2.501.000012.30%+0.051.9070.0061.913

Game terms +12.55 points; prior term -0.56 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +12.00 points. The preseason prior is -2.26 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

14.4 SP+ points

#17 · Up 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

21.95 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#7 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 3.56 on 456 plays; defense -18.39 on 405 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks UCLA 6 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
7-0 · conf 5-0 · home 4-0 · away 3-0 · expected wins 6.3
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #7 · Coaches Poll #7
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 7-0 ATS (+13.4 avg) · 2025: 4-8 ATS (-6.0 avg)
Head coach
Bob Chesney · hired 2025-12-06 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #90 (157 pts) · 2025 #46 (202 pts) · 2026 #62 (197 pts)
Returning
57% of production · 64% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing55%91%
Receiving34%27%
Rushing86%69%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back113.090.87529.63
Defensive Line103.000.86888.69
Linebacker53.000.87354.37
Offensive Line123.000.865410.39
Quarterback63.330.89345.36
Receiver133.380.875111.38
Running Back33.330.89032.67
Special Teams73.000.83855.87

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Nico Iamaleava · QB

CFBD athlete 4870799. UCLA (2025–2026); Tennessee (2023–2024)

Passing WEPA0.19712445.8%
Pass 93.8% · Rush 16.8%

1st 39.7% · 2nd 44.5% · 3rd 63.1%

Standard downs 40.9% · Passing downs 59.6%

2023: 5★ · 0.9980
Wayne Knight · RB

CFBD athlete 4912342. UCLA (2026–2026); James Madison (2022–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.41911023.8%
Pass 8.8% · Rush 34.6%

1st 25.0% · 2nd 24.7% · 3rd 19.0%

Standard downs 28.1% · Passing downs 11.6%

2022: stars unavailable
Ty Dieffenbach · QB

CFBD athlete 5092275. Cal Poly (2025–2025); UCLA (2026–2026); Pittsburgh (2023–2024)

Passing WEPA0.3837438.1%
Pass 80.9% · Rush 10.1%

1st 40.0% · 2nd 26.8% · 3rd 51.0%

Standard downs 34.7% · Passing downs 48.2%

2023: 3★ · 0.8431
Anthony Woods · RB

CFBD athlete 5083175. UCLA (2025–2026); Idaho (2022–2023); Utah (2024–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.3077215.4%
Pass 4.7% · Rush 23.1%

1st 19.1% · 2nd 15.8% · 3rd 7.0%

Standard downs 17.0% · Passing downs 10.9%

2022: 3★ · 0.8100
Jaivian Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 5114332. California (2023–2024); UCLA (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1675511.5%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 17.8%

1st 10.0% · 2nd 13.9% · 3rd 11.0%

Standard downs 12.0% · Passing downs 10.1%

2023: 3★ · 0.8678
Nico Iamaleava · QB

CFBD athlete 4870799. UCLA (2025–2026); Tennessee (2023–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.0983645.8%
Pass 93.8% · Rush 16.8%

1st 39.7% · 2nd 44.5% · 3rd 63.1%

Standard downs 40.9% · Passing downs 59.6%

2023: 5★ · 0.9980
Mateen Bhaghani · PK

CFBD athlete 5161141. California (2023–2023); UCLA (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR-2.6009—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Aidan Mizell · WR

CFBD athlete 4917945. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 9.6% · Rush 0.5%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 4.1%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
Brayden Loftin · TE

CFBD athlete 4869442. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
Brian Rowe Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5209464. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 15.0% · Rush 0.3%

1st 6.4% · 2nd 7.6% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Harry Lodge · TE

CFBD athlete 4917270. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Josh Phifer · TE

CFBD athlete 5084910. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Karson Cox · RB

CFBD athlete 5148601. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.6%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Landon Ellis · WR

CFBD athlete 5153994. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 10.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 5.7%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
Leland Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5219086. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 6.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.0% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 7.3%

Standard downs 0.6% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
Madden Iamaleava · QB

CFBD athlete 5142594. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 3.5%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Mikey Matthews · WR

CFBD athlete 4921306. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.4%
Pass 20.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.1% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 16.7%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 18.2%

Not linked
Noah Fox-Flores · TE

CFBD athlete 5295326. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 1.1%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 2.8%

Not linked
Semaj Morgan · WR

CFBD athlete 4899366. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.0%
Pass 22.3% · Rush 0.3%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 10.1% · 3rd 11.0%

Standard downs 7.0% · Passing downs 14.7%

Not linked
Shane Rosenthal · WR

CFBD athlete 5209306. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Troy Leigber · RB

CFBD athlete 5153614. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 8.0%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 43 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aidan Mizell · WRFlorida2026-01-074★ / 0.9000Immediate
Aiden Gobaira · EDGEJames Madison2026-01-053★ / 0.8800Immediate
Amier Washington · DLTexas Tech2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Anthony Sacca · LBNotre Dame2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Brayden Loftin · TEKansas State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Brian Rowe Jr. · WRSouth Carolina2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Carter Sweazie · IOLJames Madison2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chase Barry · POklahoma State2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Curtis Gerrand · PSam Houston2026-01-10— / —Immediate
DJ Barksdale · CBJames Madison2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dallin Havea · EDGEUtah Tech2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dante Lovett · CBVirginia Tech2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Darold DeNgohe · DLRutgers2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Derek Osman · OTHarvard2026-01-093★ / 0.8200Immediate
Drew Spinogatti · LBJames Madison2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dylan Lee · RBIowa State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hall Schmidt · OTBoise State2026-01-053★ / 0.8300Immediate
Harry Lodge · TEWake Forest2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
JD Rayner · OTJames Madison2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jhase McMillan · CBMontana State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jordan Davis · OTSouth Alabama2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Josh Phifer · TEJames Madison2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Landon Ellis · WRJames Madison2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Leland Smith · WRSan José State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mack Indestad · OTEastern Michigan2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Malik Hartford · SOhio State2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Marcus Harris · WRWashington2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mason Rivera · SCal Poly2026-02-17— / —Immediate
Maxwell Roy · DLOhio State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Osiris Gilbert · CBUConn2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Riley Robell · IOLJames Madison2026-01-053★ / 0.8800Immediate
Ryan McCulloch · EDGECalifornia2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Sahir West · EDGEJames Madison2026-01-113★ / 0.8800Immediate
Sammy Omosigho · LBOklahoma2026-01-134★ / 0.9100Immediate
Sean Na'a · IOLArizona State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Semaj Morgan · WRMichigan2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Stevie Amar Jr. · TEBoston College2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ta'Shawn James · SIowa State2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tao Johnson · SUtah2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Trent Hendrick · LBJames Madison2026-08-20— / —Immediate
Ty Dieffenbach · QBCal Poly2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyson Ford · DLCalifornia2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Wayne Knight · RBJames Madison2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 29 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
A.J. Fuimaono · DLNot reported2026-01-113★ / —Withdrawn
Andre Jordan Jr. · CBAuburn2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Anthony Jones · EDGENebraska2026-01-083★ / 0.8800Immediate
Ben Perry · LBLouisville2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Bryon Threats · SNot reported2026-01-143★ / —Immediate
Carter Shaw · WRStanford2026-01-273★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cole Martin · SNot reported2025-12-023★ / 0.8500Immediate
Croix Stewart · SFresno State2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ezavier Staples · WRNot reported2026-01-033★ / —Immediate
Garrison Blank · OTSacramento State2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Henry Hasselbeck · QBApp State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Isaiah Chisom · LBOklahoma State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jack Pedersen · TEWashington State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jadyn Marshall · WRNot reported2025-12-254★ / —Immediate
Jaedon Wilson · WRNot reported2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jamier Johnson · CBNot reported2026-01-174★ / —Immediate
Jamir Benjamin · CBRice2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kanye Clark · CBFlorida2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Karson Gordon · QBAustin Peay2026-05-283★ / —Immediate
Keanu Williams · DLPenn State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kwazi Gilmer · WRNebraska2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Luke Duncan · QBNevada2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Mateen Bhaghani · KNot reported2026-01-11— / —Withdrawn
Morrow Evans · LSNot reported2026-01-172★ / —Immediate
Oluwafunto Akinshilo · IOLSyracuse2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Rico Flores Jr. · WRVirginia2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Scooter Jackson · SNot reported2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Withdrawn
Siale Taupaki · DLPenn State2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Will Karoll · PTexas Tech2026-01-213★ / 0.8300Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at UCLA. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Bob Chesney · career 21–6 across 3 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 20 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Bob Chesney · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Tim Skipper · interim

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-09-14. Effective dates: 2025-09-27 to unknown.

  3. 2024–2025 · Deshaun Foster

    5–10 · 15 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-02-12. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-09-27.

  4. 2018–2023 · Chip Kelly

    35–34 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2017-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2017–2017 · Jedd Fisch

    1–1 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-11-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2012–2017 · Jim Mora

    46–30 · 76 attributed games · 6 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2008–2011 · Rick Neuheisel

    21–28 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2007-12-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2007–2007 · DeWayne Walker

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2007-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 2003–2007 · Karl Dorrell

    35–27 · 62 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2002-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1996–2002 · Bob Toledo

    49–32 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1976–1995 · Terry Donahue

    151–74–8 · 233 attributed games · 20 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1974–1975 · Dick Vermeil

    15–5–3 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1971–1973 · Pepper Rodgers

    19–12–1 · 32 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1965–1970 · Tommy Prothro

    41–18–3 · 62 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1958–1958 · George Dickerson

    1–2 · 3 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1958–1964 · Bill Barnes

    31–34–3 · 68 attributed games · 7 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1949–1957 · Red Sanders

    66–19–1 · 86 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1945–1948 · Bert LaBrucherie

    23–16 · 39 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1939–1944 · Babe Horrell

    24–31–6 · 61 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1928–1938 · William Spaulding

    56–43–6 · 105 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Bob Chesney · incomplete attribution0–0——1417.162—
2025 · Tim Skipper3–63–60–0-8.7-1.146—
2025 · Deshaun Foster0–30–00–0-8.7-1.146—
2024 · Deshaun Foster5–73–60–0-1.32.190—
2023 · Chip Kelly8–54–51–09.77.737—
2022 · Chip Kelly9–46–30–1158.46121
2021 · Chip Kelly8–46–30–09.49.229—
2020 · Chip Kelly3–43–40–0-1.1—32—
2019 · Chip Kelly4–84–50–0-3.9-1.540—
2018 · Chip Kelly3–93–60–0-0.4-419—
2017 · Jedd Fisch · incomplete attribution1–1——4.90.820—
2017 · Jim Mora · incomplete attribution5–6——4.90.820—
2016 · Jim Mora4–82–70–09.13.413—
2015 · Jim Mora8–55–40–118.69.912—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:12:29 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play58 / 13858.41 / 138100.0
Success rate38 / 13873.02 / 13899.3
Explosiveness127 / 1388.035 / 13875.2
Standard-down success33 / 13876.619 / 13886.9
Passing-down success66 / 13852.61 / 138100.0
Pass PPA92 / 13833.61 / 138100.0
Rush PPA29 / 13879.61 / 138100.0
Pass explosiveness55 / 13860.6127 / 1388.0
Rush explosiveness109 / 13821.23 / 13898.5
Line yards9 / 13894.29 / 13894.2
Second-level yards25 / 13882.523 / 13883.9
Open-field yards11 / 13892.75 / 13897.1
Stuff rate14 / 13890.511 / 13892.7
Power success54 / 13861.3T80 / 13841.6
HavocT60 / 13856.6T9 / 13893.8
Front-seven havocT21 / 13884.7T21 / 13885.0
DB havocT115 / 13816.1T17 / 13887.6
Points / opportunity87 / 13837.28 / 13894.9
Average field position2 / 13899.3T9 / 13893.8
Field-position expected points2 / 13899.314 / 13890.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Nico Iamaleava · QBUsage 45.8% · Avg PPA 0.058 · Total 8.885
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0588.88545.8%
Pass0.11013.18393.8%
Rush-0.126-4.29816.8%
1st down-0.082-5.07139.7%
2nd down0.1788.69944.5%
3rd down0.32613.35963.1%
Standard downs-0.166-16.75440.9%
Passing downs0.48425.63959.6%
Ty Dieffenbach · QBUsage 38.1% · Avg PPA 0.154 · Total 13.058
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.15413.05838.1%
Pass0.21915.76180.9%
Rush-0.208-2.70310.1%
1st down0.1053.98240.0%
2nd down-0.345-6.55326.8%
3rd down0.77020.01351.0%
Standard downs0.0160.90634.7%
Passing downs0.45012.15248.2%
Wayne Knight · RBUsage 23.8% · Avg PPA 0.354 · Total 41.015
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35441.01523.8%
Pass0.1442.4558.8%
Rush0.38938.56034.6%
1st down0.32017.59725.0%
2nd down0.1305.06024.7%
3rd down1.10520.98819.0%
Standard downs0.31231.47828.1%
Passing downs0.6369.53711.6%
Anthony Woods · RBUsage 15.4% · Avg PPA 0.262 · Total 19.613
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.26219.61315.4%
Pass-0.011-0.0964.7%
Rush0.29919.70923.1%
1st down0.53122.28419.1%
2nd down-0.328-8.19115.8%
3rd down0.4813.3647.0%
Standard downs0.44326.99417.0%
Passing downs-0.527-7.38110.9%
Jaivian Thomas · RBUsage 11.5% · Avg PPA 0.016 · Total 0.897
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0160.89711.5%
Pass0.1840.9192.6%
Rush0.000-0.02217.8%
1st down-0.064-1.40510.0%
2nd down0.4289.41913.9%
3rd down-0.274-3.01211.0%
Standard downs0.0321.37812.0%
Passing downs-0.037-0.48110.1%
Mikey Matthews · WRUsage 9.4% · Avg PPA 1.101 · Total 5.505
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.1015.5059.4%
Pass1.1015.50520.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.6135.2267.1%
2nd down-0.437-0.4377.7%
3rd down0.3580.71616.7%
Standard downs1.5964.7897.1%
Passing downs0.3580.71618.2%
Semaj Morgan · WRUsage 9.0% · Avg PPA 0.538 · Total 23.659
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.53823.6599.0%
Pass0.55123.70322.3%
Rush-0.043-0.0430.3%
1st down0.1642.7837.7%
2nd down0.2824.50410.1%
3rd down1.48816.37111.0%
Standard downs0.1353.3657.0%
Passing downs1.06820.29514.7%
Brian Rowe Jr. · WRUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.409 · Total 12.280
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.40912.2806.1%
Pass0.37110.76115.0%
Rush1.5191.5190.3%
1st down0.6048.4526.4%
2nd down0.0971.1707.6%
3rd down0.6652.6584.0%
Standard downs0.4349.9886.4%
Passing downs0.3272.2925.4%
Troy Leigber · RBUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.996 · Total 6.973
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9966.9734.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.9966.9738.0%
1st down0.4771.4304.7%
2nd down1.4714.4146.1%
3rd down1.1291.1293.7%
Standard downs1.4925.9663.7%
Passing downs0.3361.0078.3%
Landon Ellis · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.246 · Total 4.429
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2464.4294.3%
Pass0.2464.42910.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4733.3143.6%
2nd down0.0490.2944.5%
3rd down0.1640.8215.7%
Standard downs0.3514.2123.9%
Passing downs0.0360.2175.5%
Aidan Mizell · WRUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.637 · Total 8.913
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6378.9134.0%
Pass0.4956.4399.6%
Rush2.4742.4740.5%
1st down0.1080.9746.0%
2nd down3.4206.8401.7%
3rd down0.3661.0994.1%
Standard downs0.2672.9334.2%
Passing downs1.9935.9803.2%
Madden Iamaleava · QBUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA -0.426 · Total -1.705
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.426-1.7052.8%
Pass-0.608-0.6081.8%
Rush-0.366-1.0973.5%
1st down-0.425-1.2764.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.429-0.4294.0%
Standard downs-0.425-1.2762.9%
Passing downs-0.429-0.4292.3%
Noah Fox-Flores · TEUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA -1.217 · Total -4.869
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.217-4.8692.8%
Pass-0.020-0.0615.6%
Rush-4.809-4.8091.1%
1st down0.3690.7393.1%
2nd down-4.809-4.8092.0%
3rd down-0.799-0.7993.7%
Standard downs-1.357-4.0702.8%
Passing downs-0.799-0.7992.8%
Brayden Loftin · TEUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.605 · Total 6.051
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6056.0512.7%
Pass0.6056.0516.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2380.9522.4%
2nd down-0.070-0.1411.7%
3rd down1.3105.2395.3%
Standard downs0.2380.9521.5%
Passing downs0.8505.0996.1%
Josh Phifer · TEUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA -0.115 · Total -0.575
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.115-0.5752.5%
Pass-0.115-0.5756.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2230.4462.2%
2nd down-0.360-0.7203.2%
3rd down-0.302-0.3022.6%
Standard downs0.0480.1452.0%
Passing downs-0.360-0.7204.3%
Leland Smith · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 1.694 · Total 8.468
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.6948.4682.3%
Pass1.6948.4686.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3041.3041.0%
2nd down-1.053-1.0531.4%
3rd down2.7398.2177.3%
Standard downs1.3041.3040.6%
Passing downs1.7917.1646.8%
Harry Lodge · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.252 · Total -0.504
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.252-0.5041.7%
Pass-0.252-0.5044.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.252-0.5043.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.252-0.5042.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Karson Cox · RBUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -4.504 · Total -4.504
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-4.504-4.5041.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-4.504-4.5042.6%
1st down-4.504-4.5043.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-4.504-4.5042.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Shane Rosenthal · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.764 · Total -0.764
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.764-0.7641.5%
Pass-0.764-0.7644.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.764-0.7648.3%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.764-0.7645.3%
Where UCLA sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.163 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.465 (73rd percentile; 138 teams)73rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.107 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.147 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.184 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.203 (100th percentile; 138 teams)100thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.323 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.163 (75th percentile; 138 teams)75thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.201 (94th percentile; 138 teams)94th
Values and percentiles
UCLA metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.16358th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.46573rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.1078th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.14734th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.18480th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.203100th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.32399th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.16375th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.20194th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 189 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.0 yards (64th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.0 per completion. Completion 60.8%, 7.9 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.24.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.5%60.5%+1.0187 / 189
Defense allowed51.0%61.4%-10.4208 / 210

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is UCLA.

Target mix by zone, UCLA offense
Short left27% · 49Short middle26% · 48Short right31% · 56Deep left3% · 6Deep middle6% · 11Deep right7% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
UCLA passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense189100%9.06.060.8%0.24+1.0 pp187
Passing defense21099%9.26.350.5%-0.20-10.4 pp208

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2945.453.4%0.223.501.201.6011.8%75.6%
Defense allowed2262.737.1%-0.112.600.800.3021.5%72.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense290 / 294284109660279 / 279 · 100.0%
Defense allowed223 / 226217916450204 / 205 · 99.5%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.0 pp. 7 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-3.80.34.5W1W1 vs California: -2.1 ppW2W2 vs San Diego State: +3.1 ppW3W3 vs Purdue: +3.1 ppW4W4 vs Maryland: +1.7 ppW6W6 vs Oregon: -0.5 ppW7W7 vs Wisconsin: +4.5 ppW8W8 vs Michigan State: -3.8 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1California222263.6%65.7%-2.1 pp7.00.19329.00.82
W2San Diego State232166.7%63.6%+3.1 pp5.20.07435.00.33
W3Purdue323259.4%56.2%+3.1 pp11.60.52487.70.65
W4Maryland242462.5%60.8%+1.7 pp9.80.09395.80.19
W6Oregon232356.5%57.1%-0.5 pp10.60.25473.0-0.27
W7Wisconsin343464.7%60.2%+4.5 pp9.40.34373.20.04
W8Michigan State313158.1%61.9%-3.8 pp7.90.12485.10.01

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

29 punts · 44.6 gross yards/punt · 39.1 net yards/punt

11 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 29/29 punts. Known net yards: 26/29 punts.

Our punt returns

12 returns · 9.3 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 12/12 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Michigan State440.337.33/4
Week 7 · Wisconsin253.037.52/2
Week 6 · Oregon842.434.97/8
Week 4 · Maryland446.042.34/4
Week 3 · Purdue244.039.52/2
Team style
Rating history