Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

UAB

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

UAB's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 101.5 across 8 systems; best 77, worst 119, so they disagree by 42 places.

Lab EPA
#93
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#117
down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#110
down 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#91
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#119
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#77
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#113
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#93
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#85 of 138
Schedule strength
#107 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#82 of 138
Game control
#126 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#115 of 138
Offense
#122 of 138
Defense
#93 of 138
Special teams
#45 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

UAB · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.058 net EPA/play

#93

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-8.45 points

#117 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -3.29 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -5.80, schedule #102 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -2.47. That is worth -9.09 on its own; the preseason prior of -6.50 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -8.45.

How each game enters this SRS rating

UAB · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Illinois
away · 2026-09-04 · ID 401858424
-19.00 → -19.00+2.500.76379.52%+3.72-1.5720.355-1.217
Week 2 · UL Monroe
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862708
+6.00 → +6.00-2.500.79379.90%-17.750.346-1.757-1.410
Week 3 · Louisiana
away · 2026-09-20 · ID 401862776
-7.00 → -7.00+2.500.824910.29%-0.55-0.463-0.057-0.520
Week 4 · Navy
home · 2026-09-25 · ID 401862778
+4.00 → +4.00-2.500.857210.69%-2.280.160-0.244-0.083
Week 5 · Samford
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862793
+19.00 → +19.00-2.500.890911.11%-25.00 (fixed lower division)1.833-2.778-0.944
Week 6 · Memphis
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401862798
-25.00 → -25.00+2.500.925911.55%+2.46-2.5980.284-2.314
Week 7 · East Carolina
home · 2026-10-15 · ID 401862800
+13.00 → +1.00 (OT)-2.500.962212.00%-1.32-0.180-0.159-0.339

Game terms -6.83 points; prior term -1.62 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -8.45 points. The preseason prior is -6.50 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-10.4 SP+ points

#110 · Down 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-3.18 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#77 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -7.42 on 370 plays; defense -4.24 on 383 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks UAB 24 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 2-1 · home 4-0 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.6
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-3-1 ATS (+1.6 avg) · 2025: 4-8 ATS (-1.6 avg)
Head coach
Alex Mortensen · hired 2025-12-05 · 2-4 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #98 (151 pts) · 2025 #125 (98 pts) · 2026 #135 (135 pts)
Returning
80% of production · 86% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing100%100%
Receiving74%69%
Rushing63%85%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back73.000.83025.81
Defensive Line143.070.845111.83
Linebacker33.000.83942.52
Offensive Line93.000.83857.55
Quarterback23.000.84331.69
Receiver82.880.85026.80
Running Back23.000.85001.70
Special Teams43.000.82863.31

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Ryder Burton · QB

CFBD athlete 5057381. UAB (2025–2026); BYU (2023–2023); West Virginia (2024–2024)

Passing WEPA0.13816847.1%
Pass 96.8% · Rush 14.3%

1st 32.0% · 2nd 46.4% · 3rd 76.1%

Standard downs 36.1% · Passing downs 70.4%

2023: 3★ · 0.8464
Roderick Robinson II · RB

CFBD athlete 4918110. UAB (2026–2026); Georgia (2023–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.0388722.7%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 36.6%

1st 28.5% · 2nd 24.2% · 3rd 12.8%

Standard downs 28.7% · Passing downs 9.9%

2023: 4★ · 0.9248
Braylon McReynolds · RB

CFBD athlete 4897730. UAB (2026–2026); South Alabama (2022–2024); UL Monroe (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1486416.8%
Pass 4.7% · Rush 26.0%

1st 19.5% · 2nd 17.0% · 3rd 10.1%

Standard downs 18.8% · Passing downs 12.5%

2022: 3★ · 0.8111
Ryder Burton · QB

CFBD athlete 5057381. UAB (2025–2026); BYU (2023–2023); West Virginia (2024–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.1583347.1%
Pass 96.8% · Rush 14.3%

1st 32.0% · 2nd 46.4% · 3rd 76.1%

Standard downs 36.1% · Passing downs 70.4%

2023: 3★ · 0.8464
Jonah Delange · PK

CFBD athlete 5151663. UAB (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR11.87019—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
AJ Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 5095096. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 2.3%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 1.6%

Not linked
Antonio Ferguson · TE

CFBD athlete 5078812. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.1% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 1.4% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
C.J. Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 4711421. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.8%
Pass 21.6% · Rush 0.4%

1st 5.5% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 16.5%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 16.4%

Not linked
EJ Reid · WR

CFBD athlete 5219011. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 14.2% · Rush 1.1%

1st 5.5% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 7.3%

Standard downs 4.9% · Passing downs 9.2%

Not linked
Gabriel Cline · TE

CFBD athlete 5203714. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Ja'Vin Simpkins · RB

CFBD athlete 5157261. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 12.8%

1st 10.5% · 2nd 11.1% · 3rd 0.9%

Standard downs 9.3% · Passing downs 6.6%

Not linked
Jayson Moll · RB

CFBD athlete 5393807. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.3%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
KJ Daniels · WR

CFBD athlete 5122390. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 1.6%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 1.5%

Not linked
Kaleb Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 4685283. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.7%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 4.7%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Lamar White · WR

CFBD athlete 5219703. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Nate Rogers · QB

CFBD athlete 5197123. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 4.4%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 3.9% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 4.7%

Not linked
Scott Isacks III · TE

CFBD athlete 5081640. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.6% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 2.1%

Standard downs 0.7% · Passing downs 3.9%

Not linked
Sean Persson · TE

CFBD athlete 5295450. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 7.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Tiaquelin Mims · WR

CFBD athlete 5092470. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 15.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 6.4%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 38 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anta'Veon McKenzie · SSacramento State2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Bam McReynolds · RBUL Monroe2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Blanche Gold · EDGEMorgan State2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Braden Sullivan · LBEastern Kentucky2026-01-183★ / 0.8300Immediate
CJ Smith · WRMemphis2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cam Cunningham · DLYoungstown State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Chris Spencer · DLOld Dominion2026-01-163★ / 0.8200Immediate
Cooper Young · IOLWest Virginia2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Courage Ugochukwu · CBUtah State2026-01-253★ / 0.8200Immediate
Darrell Sweeting · CBMarshall2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Diezel Wilkinson · SMontana2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Draden Fullbright · CBOklahoma State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
EJ Reid · WRWake Forest2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Eli Hall · EDGELiberty2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Elijah Pratt · SSMU2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Guylijah Theodule · CBSouthern Miss2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ike Esonwune · LBOklahoma State2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ja'Vin Simpkins · RBCoastal Carolina2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jaylen Thompson · SMemphis2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jeremiah Jordan · SMemphis2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jotavion Pierce · SOklahoma State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
KJ Daniels · WROklahoma2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Keyon Cox · OTOregon State2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kris Wokomah · SBaylor2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Mantrez Walker · LBColorado2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Marlin Dean · EDGEGeorgia State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Muaaz Byard · LBMiddle Tennessee2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Noah Nelson · DLGeorgia State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Que Billingsley · CBGardner-Webb2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Raymond Macias · DLCampbell2026-01-113★ / 0.8200Immediate
Rod Robinson II · RBGeorgia2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Samuel Riddy Jr. · OTEast Carolina2026-01-253★ / 0.8200Immediate
Scott Isacks III · TEFlorida2026-01-163★ / 0.8200Immediate
Sean Persson · TEToledo2026-01-143★ / 0.8200Immediate
Shaun Myers · LBColorado2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Sterling Sanders · DLBoston College2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ty Mims · WRTexas State2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tylin Jackson · EDGEEastern Washington2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 35 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
AJ Brown · SRice2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
AJ Johnson · WRNot reported2026-01-093★ / —Withdrawn
Aaron Mattingly · TENot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Amorie Morrison · EDGENot reported2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Brandon Sneh · OTMississippi State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Caleb Moser · LSUSC2026-09-09— / —Immediate
Calib Perez · IOLNot reported2026-01-273★ / 0.8500Withdrawn
Corri Milliner · WRNorth Texas2026-01-163★ / 0.8300TBD
Daniel Mincey · IOLNot reported2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Devin Hightower · LBTulsa2026-02-023★ / 0.8400Immediate
Eamon Smalls · DLKansas2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Eddy Toussom · EDGENot reported2025-12-303★ / —Immediate
Eli Ennis · LBStephen F. Austin2026-02-02— / —Immediate
Elijah Lagg · TEPittsburgh2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ezra Odinjor · EDGEToledo2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Iverson Hooks · WROregon2026-01-123★ / 0.8800Immediate
J.C. Sivley · TENot reported2025-12-093★ / —Immediate
Ja'Lyen Judson · CBKennesaw State2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
JaSire Peterson · DLNot reported2025-12-194★ / —Immediate
James Steel · DLDelaware2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jaylyn Ferguson · WRNot reported2026-01-04— / —Immediate
Jeremiah Vessel · SNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Jonathan Allen · DLVirginia2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Josh Baka · SNot reported2026-01-152★ / —Immediate
Joshua Underwood · DLAlabama2026-09-09— / —Immediate
Kyle McKinney · SNot reported2026-01-03— / —Immediate
Logan Moore · OTBaylor2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mason Chorak · IOLNot reported2026-01-04— / —Immediate
Payton Kirkland · IOLNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate
Perry Fisher · CBKennesaw State2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Pierre Royster · SNot reported2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Solomon Beebe · RBVirginia2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tylan McNichols · LBWake Forest2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Xavier Daisy · WRKentucky2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zach Johnson · EDGEToledo2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at UAB. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Alex Mortensen · career 2–4 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 8 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Alex Mortensen · active at capture

    2–4 · 6 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-05. Effective dates: 2025-10-18 to unknown.

  2. 2023–2025 · Trent Dilfer

    9–21 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2022-11-30. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-10-18.

  3. 2022–2022 · Bryant Vincent · interim

    7–6 · 13 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2022-06-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2017–2021 · Bill Clark

    43–20 · 63 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2014–2014 · Bill Clark

    6–6 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2014-01-22. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2012–2013 · Garrick McGee

    5–19 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2011-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2007–2011 · Neil Callaway

    18–42 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1996–2006 · Watson Brown

    57–68 · 125 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Alex Mortensen · incomplete attribution0–0——-8.9-11.6135—
2025 · Trent Dilfer2–40–30–0-15.8-14.3125—
2025 · Alex Mortensen2–42–30–0-15.8-14.3125—
2024 · Trent Dilfer3–92–60–0-11.3-11.698—
2023 · Trent Dilfer4–83–50–0-14.7-14.392—
2022 · Bryant Vincent7–64–41–0-0.5-1.186—
2021 · Bill Clark9–46–21–09.11116—
2020 · Bill Clark6–34–10–06.34.1103—
2019 · Bill Clark9–56–30–1-1.4-7.974—
2018 · Bill Clark11–38–11–0-0.30.6103—
2017 · Bill Clark8–56–20–1—-13.6108—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-23 16:44:07 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play115 / 13816.839 / 13872.3
Success rate84 / 13839.4103 / 13825.5
Explosiveness106 / 13823.43 / 13898.5
Standard-down success106 / 13823.4119 / 13813.9
Passing-down success53 / 13862.031 / 13878.1
Pass PPA128 / 1387.316 / 13889.1
Rush PPA83 / 13840.186 / 13838.0
Pass explosiveness51 / 13863.55 / 13897.1
Rush explosiveness85 / 13838.755 / 13860.6
Line yards73 / 13847.4131 / 1385.1
Second-level yards103 / 13825.5103 / 13825.5
Open-field yards111 / 13819.740 / 13871.5
Stuff rate78 / 13843.8135 / 1382.2
Power success72 / 13848.2T57 / 13858.8
HavocT103 / 13824.5T73 / 13846.7
Front-seven havocT123 / 13810.251 / 13863.5
DB havocT51 / 13862.0T97 / 13828.8
Points / opportunity120 / 13813.196 / 13830.7
Average field positionT48 / 13865.3T86 / 13836.1
Field-position expected pointsT54 / 13860.9T89 / 13835.0

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Ryder Burton · QBUsage 47.1% · Avg PPA 0.072 · Total 16.046
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07216.04647.1%
Pass0.0315.76696.8%
Rush0.29411.46714.3%
1st down-0.128-8.17032.0%
2nd down0.15010.64146.4%
3rd down0.37531.15376.1%
Standard downs-0.091-10.67136.1%
Passing downs0.25026.71770.4%
Roderick Robinson II · RBUsage 22.7% · Avg PPA 0.014 · Total 1.493
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0141.49322.7%
Pass0.4173.3354.2%
Rush-0.018-1.84136.6%
1st down-0.039-2.22328.5%
2nd down0.1284.73124.2%
3rd down-0.072-1.01412.8%
Standard downs-0.019-1.80328.7%
Passing downs0.2203.2979.9%
Braylon McReynolds · RBUsage 16.8% · Avg PPA -0.001 · Total -0.050
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.001-0.05016.8%
Pass-0.185-1.6654.7%
Rush0.0231.61526.0%
1st down-0.150-5.86819.5%
2nd down0.3609.35117.0%
3rd down0.0310.34410.1%
Standard downs-0.216-13.17118.8%
Passing downs0.69113.12112.5%
C.J. Smith · WRUsage 8.8% · Avg PPA 0.586 · Total 24.609
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.58624.6098.8%
Pass0.55822.89421.6%
Rush1.7151.7150.4%
1st down0.6006.5975.5%
2nd down0.3484.5298.5%
3rd down0.74913.48316.5%
Standard downs0.3856.5515.2%
Passing downs0.72218.05816.4%
Ja'Vin Simpkins · RBUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.058 · Total 2.302
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0582.3028.4%
Pass-0.292-1.4602.6%
Rush0.1073.76212.8%
1st down0.0741.56110.5%
2nd down-0.074-1.26511.1%
3rd down0.0530.0530.9%
Standard downs0.1825.4749.3%
Passing downs-0.317-3.1726.6%
EJ Reid · WRUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 0.381 · Total 11.417
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.38111.4176.3%
Pass0.3118.39714.2%
Rush1.0073.0201.1%
1st down0.6537.1865.5%
2nd down0.0921.0127.2%
3rd down0.4023.2187.3%
Standard downs0.72911.6624.9%
Passing downs-0.018-0.2469.2%
Tiaquelin Mims · WRUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 0.732 · Total 21.948
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.73221.9486.3%
Pass0.73221.94815.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2683.2176.0%
2nd down1.81418.1376.5%
3rd down0.6304.4096.4%
Standard downs0.5349.6075.6%
Passing downs1.02812.3417.9%
Kaleb Brown · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA -0.162 · Total -1.616
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.162-1.6163.6%
Pass-0.353-3.1807.4%
Rush1.5641.5640.7%
1st down-0.093-0.2792.5%
2nd down-0.191-0.5723.4%
3rd down1.1303.3894.7%
Standard downs-1.109-5.5432.8%
Passing downs0.7863.9285.1%
Nate Rogers · QBUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.175 · Total 2.449
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1752.4493.5%
Pass-0.095-0.3792.5%
Rush0.2832.8284.4%
1st down-0.100-0.6023.6%
2nd down0.8794.3933.9%
3rd down-0.447-1.3413.3%
Standard downs-0.230-1.8423.0%
Passing downs0.7154.2914.7%
KJ Daniels · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.573 · Total 3.441
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5733.4413.0%
Pass0.0000.0005.7%
Rush1.7203.4411.6%
1st down0.5932.3744.5%
2nd down0.5341.0673.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3151.5733.8%
Passing downs1.8681.8681.5%
Sean Persson · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA -0.332 · Total -2.655
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.332-2.6553.0%
Pass-0.332-2.6557.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.708-1.4161.7%
2nd down-0.205-0.6143.4%
3rd down1.3432.6873.3%
Standard downs-0.720-2.1591.7%
Passing downs-0.099-0.4965.3%
Jayson Moll · RBUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA -0.806 · Total -3.223
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.806-3.2232.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.806-3.2234.3%
1st down-0.643-1.9294.8%
2nd down-1.294-1.2942.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.806-3.2234.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
AJ Johnson · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.321 · Total 1.285
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3211.2852.0%
Pass0.3211.2855.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.5791.5791.2%
2nd down-0.002-0.0033.0%
3rd down-0.291-0.2912.3%
Standard downs0.5251.5762.1%
Passing downs-0.291-0.2911.6%
Antonio Ferguson · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.011 · Total -0.045
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.011-0.0452.0%
Pass-0.011-0.0455.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.114-1.1141.1%
2nd down-0.602-1.2033.1%
3rd down2.2732.2732.0%
Standard downs-1.024-2.0481.4%
Passing downs1.0012.0033.2%
Gabriel Cline · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.274 · Total 0.821
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2740.8212.0%
Pass0.2740.8215.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5971.1953.2%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.374-0.3742.9%
Standard downs0.5971.1952.0%
Passing downs-0.374-0.3742.1%
Scott Isacks III · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.676 · Total 4.733
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6764.7331.7%
Pass0.6764.7334.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3980.3980.6%
2nd down-0.002-0.0073.1%
3rd down2.1714.3412.1%
Standard downs1.3912.7810.7%
Passing downs0.3901.9523.9%
Lamar White · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.377 · Total 0.754
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3770.7541.4%
Pass0.3770.7544.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6620.6621.6%
2nd down0.0910.0912.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3770.7542.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where UAB sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.031 (17th percentile; 138 teams)17thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.416 (39th percentile; 138 teams)39thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.169 (23rd percentile; 138 teams)23rdOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: -0.004 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.075 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.017 (72nd percentile; 138 teams)72ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.431 (26th percentile; 138 teams)26thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.038 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.155 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47th
Values and percentiles
UAB metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.03117th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.41639th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.16923rd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play-0.0047th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.07541st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.01772nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.43126th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.03899th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15547th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 97% of 172 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.0 yards (80th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.3 per completion. Completion 53.5%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.19.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense54.1%58.5%-4.4148 / 172
Defense allowed59.6%63.0%-3.4114 / 146

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is UAB.

Target mix by zone, UAB offense
Short left23% · 38Short middle31% · 50Short right33% · 53Deep left4% · 7Deep middle1% · 1Deep right9% · 14

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
UAB passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense17297%10.04.353.5%0.19-4.4 pp148
Passing defense14697%7.84.959.6%0.04-3.4 pp114

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2974.145.8%0.073.101.001.0016.4%70.3%
Defense allowed3014.546.6%0.123.401.100.8012.0%69.2%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense293 / 2972871019330274 / 275 · 99.6%
Defense allowed293 / 3012901115332282 / 283 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -4.4 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-11.8-4.23.4W1W1 vs Illinois: +0.6 ppW2W2 vs UL Monroe: -10.4 ppW3W3 vs Louisiana: -1.9 ppW4W4 vs Navy: +3.4 ppW5W6W6 vs Memphis: -11.8 ppW7W7 vs East Carolina: -7.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Illinois313060.0%59.4%+0.6 pp10.10.12484.10.23
W2UL Monroe161546.7%57.1%-10.4 pp10.0-0.10525.10.31
W3Louisiana272657.7%59.6%-1.9 pp10.70.11313.2-0.41
W4Navy202065.0%61.6%+3.4 pp7.90.67343.40.13
W5Samford190———8.40.46514.90.26
W6Memphis222245.5%57.3%-11.8 pp11.3-0.27493.7-0.21
W7East Carolina373548.6%56.5%-7.9 pp10.70.32323.1-0.03

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

24 punts · 45.8 gross yards/punt · 38.9 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 0 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 24/24 punts. Known net yards: 18/24 punts.

Our punt returns

11 returns · 13.2 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

2 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 11/11 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · East Carolina645.545.06/6
Week 6 · Memphis347.042.52/3
Week 5 · Samford354.353.52/3
Week 4 · Navy447.842.54/4
Week 3 · Louisiana639.029.33/6
Team style
Rating history