Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Tulsa

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Tulsa's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 74 across 8 systems; best 51, worst 107, so they disagree by 56 places.

Lab EPA
#51
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#77
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#83
up 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#107
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#83
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#65
up 4 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#71
down 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#51
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#98 of 138
Schedule strength
#108 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#94 of 138
Game control
#92 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#77 of 138
Offense
#68 of 138
Defense
#71 of 138
Special teams
#121 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Tulsa · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.041 net EPA/play

#51

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-1.22 points

#77 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +4.19 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -4.14, schedule #87 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -1.36. That is worth +0.05 on its own; the preseason prior of -5.66 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -1.22.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Tulsa · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Oklahoma State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856772
+14.00 → +14.00-2.500.76378.47%+7.380.9740.6251.599
Week 2 · Sam Houston
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862707
+6.00 → +6.00+2.500.79378.80%-12.920.748-1.137-0.389
Week 3 · East Texas A&M
home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401862775
+42.00 → +35.00-2.500.82499.15%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.973-2.2870.686
Week 4 · Arkansas
away · 2026-09-27 · ID 401856697
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.85729.51%-2.10-2.424-0.200-2.624
Week 5 · North Texas
home · 2026-10-02 · ID 401862786
-1.00 → -1.00 (OT)-2.500.89099.88%+5.88-0.3460.5810.235
Week 6 · Navy
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401862799
-8.00 → -8.00+2.500.925910.27%-2.28-0.565-0.234-0.799
Week 7 · Rice
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862805
+21.00 → +21.00+2.500.962210.67%-9.252.507-0.9871.520
Week 8 · Army
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401862808
-3.00 → -3.00-2.501.000011.09%+3.73-0.6100.414-0.196

Game terms +0.03 points; prior term -1.25 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -1.22 points. The preseason prior is -5.66 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-2.2 SP+ points

#83 · Up 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

1.11 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#65 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -0.86 on 433 plays; defense -1.97 on 494 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Tulsa 26 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 1-3 · home 2-2 · away 2-2 · expected wins 4.4
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4-1 ATS (+1.4 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (+0.4 avg)
Head coach
Tre Lamb · hired 2024-12-08 · 4-8 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #54 (192 pts) · 2025 #109 (138 pts) · 2026 #93 (179 pts)
Returning
41% of production · 40% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing69%78%
Receiving42%24%
Rushing11%18%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.000.847011.01
Defensive Line113.000.84199.26
Linebacker73.000.84365.91
Offensive Line123.000.842610.11
Quarterback33.000.85782.57
Receiver173.000.845914.38
Running Back43.000.86063.44
Special Teams43.000.82713.31

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Baylor Hayes · QB

CFBD athlete 5224011. Tulsa (2025–2026); East Tennessee State (2024–2024)

Passing WEPA0.26720856.3%
Pass 97.1% · Rush 14.4%

1st 55.5% · 2nd 48.8% · 3rd 70.6%

Standard downs 52.9% · Passing downs 63.2%

2024: stars unavailable
Damari Alston · RB

CFBD athlete 4685699. Auburn (2022–2025); Tulsa (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.15010023.8%
Pass 9.1% · Rush 40.5%

1st 26.0% · 2nd 26.2% · 3rd 17.0%

Standard downs 26.7% · Passing downs 17.5%

2022: 4★ · 0.8995
Trequan Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5295930. Tulsa (2026–2026); Old Dominion (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.3005611.9%
Pass 1.9% · Rush 23.0%

1st 14.3% · 2nd 14.0% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 12.0% · Passing downs 11.7%

2025: stars unavailable
Owen Carey · PK

CFBD athlete 5326901. Tulsa (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-0.5607—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2026: 3★ · 0.8156
Marlon Hauck · PK

CFBD athlete 5085238. Tulsa (2026–2026); Mississippi State (2022–2025)

Kicker PAAR-3.8503—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2022: stars unavailable
Chris Gacayan II · TE

CFBD athlete 5296086. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.7%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 1.5%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
DJ McKinney · RB

CFBD athlete 5125823. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 6.4%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 6.0% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 7.2%

Not linked
David Wells Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5157287. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.7%
Pass 11.0% · Rush 0.4%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 4.7%

Not linked
Dexter Williams II · QB

CFBD athlete 4565355. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——20.7%
Pass 36.3% · Rush 6.0%

1st 14.8% · 2nd 18.9% · 3rd 31.9%

Standard downs 19.7% · Passing downs 23.1%

Not linked
Donnell Gee Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5223788. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 9.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Grant McAtee · TE

CFBD athlete 5262779. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 1.6%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked
Grayson Tempest · WR

CFBD athlete 5121616. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Jackson Shockley · TE

CFBD athlete 5217701. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Javon Ross · WR

CFBD athlete 5229589. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.9%
Pass 14.8% · Rush 1.2%

1st 8.1% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 7.0% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
Jewlyen Roberts · TE

CFBD athlete 5146761. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 1.7%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 1.2%

Not linked
Jimmy Calloway · WR

CFBD athlete 4429804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.3%
Pass 20.3% · Rush 3.2%

1st 11.8% · 2nd 7.8% · 3rd 17.9%

Standard downs 11.3% · Passing downs 11.2%

Not linked
Josh Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5146727. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 1.3%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 2.6%

Not linked
Luke Tevis · TE

CFBD athlete 5222570. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.2% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Oran Singleton Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 4710860. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.0%
Pass 23.9% · Rush 2.4%

1st 13.5% · 2nd 11.6% · 3rd 16.1%

Standard downs 13.1% · Passing downs 12.9%

Not linked
Seth Davis · RB

CFBD athlete 4920162. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 20.9%

1st 13.8% · 2nd 16.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 15.7% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Sevion Morrison · RB

CFBD athlete 4576218. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 4.8%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 2.4%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Xavier Green · WR

CFBD athlete 5244757. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 21 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Andrew Hand · SEast Tennessee State2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Arias Nash · DLVirginia Tech2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Caldra Williford · CBBaylor2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
DJ McKinney · RBNew Mexico2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Damari Alston · RBAuburn2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
David Wells Jr. · WROregon State2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Devin Hightower · LBUAB2026-02-023★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dexter Williams II · QBKennesaw State2026-01-073★ / 0.8300Immediate
Grant McAtee · TENorth Central College2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Javon Ross · WRBethune-Cookman2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jayden Madkins · DLLouisiana Tech2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jimmy Calloway · WRTulane2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kyran Duhon · EDGEOklahoma State2026-01-083★ / 0.8800Immediate
Malachi Preciado · IOLSouth Alabama2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Marlon Hauck · KMississippi State2026-01-103★ / 0.8300Immediate
Max Tulen · PBethune-Cookman2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Oran Singleton Jr. · WRWest Virginia2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Rylan Leathers · SIdaho State2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Seth Davis · RBMississippi State2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Thomas Davis · EDGEApp State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Trequan Jones · RBOld Dominion2026-01-263★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 22 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ajay Allen · RBNot reported2026-01-014★ / —Immediate
Alex Green · WRNot reported2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Angus Davies · PCalifornia2026-01-16— / —Immediate
Brody Foley · TELouisville2026-01-074★ / 0.9200Immediate
Buddha Garrett · SNot reported2025-12-233★ / —Immediate
Champ Lewis · CBSouthern Miss2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Codie Hornsby · IOLNot reported2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Dallen Ponder · WRNot reported2025-12-273★ / —Immediate
Decari Prater · SNot reported2025-12-303★ / 0.8400Immediate
Evan Odom · OTStephen F. Austin2026-02-023★ / —Immediate
J'Dan Burnett · EDGERutgers2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jacob Emmers · WRNot reported2025-12-103★ / —Immediate
Jaxon Lee · EDGENot reported2026-01-163★ / —Immediate
Joe Hjelle · DLIndiana2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josh Anglin · LBKennesaw State2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
Kirk Francis · QBTexas Tech2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Mason Fleming · DLAustin Peay2026-01-243★ / —Immediate
Mekhi Miller · WRMissouri State2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Parker Stone · LSApp State2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Ray Coney · LBTexas A&M2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Zion Booker · WRKennesaw State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zion Steptoe · WRMinnesota2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Tulsa. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Tre Lamb · career 4–8 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 24 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Tre Lamb · active at capture

    4–8 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Ryan Switzer · interim

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2024-11-24. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2023–2024 · Kevin Wilson

    7–16 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2022-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2015–2022 · Philip Montgomery

    43–53 · 96 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Hired 2014-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2011–2014 · Bill Blankenship

    24–27 · 51 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2011-01-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2007–2010 · Todd Graham

    36–17 · 53 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2007-01-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2003–2006 · Steve Kragthorpe

    29–22 · 51 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2002-12-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2000–2002 · Keith Burns

    7–28 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 1999-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1988–1999 · David Rader

    50–83–1 · 134 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1987–1987 · George Henshaw

    3–8 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1985–1986 · Don Morton

    13–9 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1977–1984 · John Cooper

    56–32 · 88 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1972–1976 · F. Dry

    31–18–1 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1970–1972 · Claude Gibson

    11–16 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1969–1969 · Vince Carillot

    1–9 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1961–1968 · Glenn Dobbs

    45–37 · 82 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1955–1960 · Robert Dobbs

    30–28–2 · 60 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1953–1954 · Bernie Witucki

    3–18 · 21 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1946–1952 · John Brothers

    45–25–4 · 74 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1941–1945 · Henry Frnka

    40–9–1 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1939–1940 · Chet Benefiel

    11–8–1 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1936–1938 · Vic Hurt

    15–9–5 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1933–1935 · Gus Henderson

    14–9–2 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1917–1917 · Hal Medford

    0–8–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Tre Lamb · incomplete attribution0–0——-2.7-0.793—
2025 · Tre Lamb4–81–70–0-10-11.3109—
2024 · Kevin Wilson · incomplete attribution3–8——-20.6-23.854—
2024 · Ryan Switzer · incomplete attribution0–1——-20.6-23.854—
2023 · Kevin Wilson4–82–60–0-13.7-12.7115—
2022 · Philip Montgomery5–73–50–0-6.1-4.7112—
2021 · Philip Montgomery7–65–31–05.8-1.1126—
2020 · Philip Montgomery6–36–10–15.6—112—
2019 · Philip Montgomery4–82–60–0-2.5-0.1109—
2018 · Philip Montgomery3–92–60–0-11.2-1297—
2017 · Philip Montgomery2–101–70–0-10.7-8.785—
2016 · Philip Montgomery10–36–21–07.45.995—
2015 · Philip Montgomery6–73–50–1-8.5-5.3109—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-24 04:04:54 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play50 / 13864.262 / 13855.5
Success rate101 / 13827.071 / 13848.9
Explosiveness40 / 13871.554 / 13861.3
Standard-down success67 / 13851.855 / 13860.6
Passing-down success125 / 1389.598 / 13829.2
Pass PPA78 / 13843.866 / 13852.6
Rush PPA19 / 13886.985 / 13838.7
Pass explosiveness105 / 13824.168 / 13851.1
Rush explosiveness14 / 13890.589 / 13835.8
Line yards57 / 13859.181 / 13841.6
Second-level yards77 / 13844.563 / 13854.7
Open-field yards36 / 13874.598 / 13829.2
Stuff rate24 / 13883.2102 / 13826.3
Power successT43 / 13869.0T26 / 13881.0
HavocT76 / 13844.9129 / 1386.6
Front-seven havocT35 / 13874.1T120 / 13812.4
DB havocT108 / 13820.4T118 / 13813.5
Points / opportunity50 / 13864.232 / 13877.4
Average field positionT50 / 13863.9T35 / 13874.5
Field-position expected points52 / 13862.834 / 13875.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Baylor Hayes · QBUsage 56.3% · Avg PPA 0.245 · Total 55.870
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.24555.87056.3%
Pass0.26653.00597.1%
Rush0.2988.05614.4%
1st down0.11511.08455.5%
2nd down0.16810.59948.8%
3rd down0.41925.13470.6%
Standard downs0.26037.46452.9%
Passing downs0.21918.40663.2%
Damari Alston · RBUsage 23.8% · Avg PPA 0.090 · Total 11.372
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.09011.37223.8%
Pass-0.061-1.4709.1%
Rush0.12612.84240.5%
1st down-0.058-3.37226.0%
2nd down0.1104.96326.2%
3rd down0.4027.64417.0%
Standard downs0.0767.29026.7%
Passing downs0.1364.08117.5%
Dexter Williams II · QBUsage 20.7% · Avg PPA -0.015 · Total -1.037
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.015-1.03720.7%
Pass0.0543.30536.3%
Rush-0.434-4.3426.0%
1st down0.0481.00214.8%
2nd down-0.467-9.81718.9%
3rd down0.2455.62631.9%
Standard downs0.0200.95219.7%
Passing downs-0.083-1.98823.1%
Oran Singleton Jr. · WRUsage 13.0% · Avg PPA 0.377 · Total 26.007
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.37726.00713.0%
Pass0.39324.76823.9%
Rush0.2071.2392.4%
1st down0.1765.28613.5%
2nd down0.4007.99511.6%
3rd down0.89116.03816.1%
Standard downs0.38418.06113.1%
Passing downs0.3617.94612.9%
Seth Davis · RBUsage 12.9% · Avg PPA 0.533 · Total 4.801
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5334.80112.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5334.80120.9%
1st down0.0610.24313.8%
2nd down0.9453.77916.0%
3rd down0.7780.7787.7%
Standard downs0.6845.47015.7%
Passing downs-0.669-0.6695.3%
Trequan Jones · RBUsage 11.9% · Avg PPA 0.090 · Total 5.692
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0905.69211.9%
Pass-0.358-1.7911.9%
Rush0.1297.48223.0%
1st down-0.099-3.15914.3%
2nd down0.2305.50814.0%
3rd down0.4773.3426.3%
Standard downs0.0753.21112.0%
Passing downs0.1242.48111.7%
Jimmy Calloway · WRUsage 11.3% · Avg PPA 0.208 · Total 8.930
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2088.93011.3%
Pass0.1836.78920.3%
Rush0.3572.1413.2%
1st down0.2645.01011.8%
2nd down-0.026-0.2587.8%
3rd down0.2984.17817.9%
Standard downs-0.051-1.49211.3%
Passing downs0.74410.42211.2%
Javon Ross · WRUsage 7.9% · Avg PPA 0.714 · Total 29.981
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.71429.9817.9%
Pass0.59223.09614.8%
Rush2.2956.8851.2%
1st down0.4808.6338.1%
2nd down0.3215.1289.3%
3rd down2.02716.2207.1%
Standard downs0.54813.7067.0%
Passing downs0.95716.2759.9%
David Wells Jr. · WRUsage 5.7% · Avg PPA 0.649 · Total 19.460
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.64919.4605.7%
Pass0.56516.39711.0%
Rush3.0643.0640.4%
1st down-0.247-2.9675.4%
2nd down-0.016-0.0822.9%
3rd down1.1389.1017.1%
Standard downs0.68014.9636.1%
Passing downs0.5624.4974.7%
Donnell Gee Jr. · WRUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA 0.420 · Total 6.716
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4206.7164.8%
Pass0.4206.7169.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0844.3362.9%
2nd down-0.662-2.6483.7%
3rd down0.2831.9829.7%
Standard downs0.6207.4415.3%
Passing downs-0.181-0.7243.8%
DJ McKinney · RBUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA -0.072 · Total -1.447
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.072-1.4474.3%
Pass-0.275-1.6472.5%
Rush0.0140.2006.4%
1st down0.0050.0252.6%
2nd down0.1111.0026.0%
3rd down-0.412-2.4755.9%
Standard downs-0.273-2.4542.9%
Passing downs0.0921.0077.2%
Sevion Morrison · RBUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 1.183 · Total 8.284
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.1838.2843.5%
Pass1.1182.2352.2%
Rush1.2106.0484.8%
1st down0.6591.9763.5%
2nd down0.0710.0711.5%
3rd down1.1101.1102.4%
Standard downs1.1838.2845.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Chris Gacayan II · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA -0.435 · Total -4.780
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.435-4.7803.4%
Pass-0.009-0.0906.1%
Rush-4.690-4.6900.7%
1st down-0.291-1.4563.6%
2nd down-0.559-2.7974.8%
3rd down-0.528-0.5281.5%
Standard downs-0.668-5.3403.6%
Passing downs0.1870.5613.1%
Grayson Tempest · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.602 · Total -1.807
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.602-1.8072.3%
Pass-0.602-1.8075.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.143-1.1431.7%
2nd down0.0520.0522.2%
3rd down-0.716-0.7164.2%
Standard downs-1.143-1.1431.1%
Passing downs-0.332-0.6645.3%
Luke Tevis · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.388 · Total 2.776
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.3882.7761.6%
Pass1.3882.7762.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.9531.9531.8%
2nd down0.8240.8242.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.9531.9531.2%
Passing downs0.8240.8242.1%
Jewlyen Roberts · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.938 · Total -3.751
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.938-3.7511.5%
Pass-0.938-3.7512.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.2921.2921.7%
Standard downs-0.440-1.3191.6%
Passing downs-2.432-2.4321.2%
Xavier Green · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.448 · Total -0.896
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.448-0.8961.5%
Pass-0.448-0.8963.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.085-0.0851.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.811-0.8113.6%
Standard downs-0.085-0.0851.1%
Passing downs-0.811-0.8112.1%
Grant McAtee · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.356 · Total -1.423
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.356-1.4231.4%
Pass-0.356-1.4232.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.159-1.1590.9%
2nd down-0.155-0.3102.2%
3rd down0.0460.0461.6%
Standard downs-0.530-1.0601.0%
Passing downs-0.181-0.3632.4%
Jackson Shockley · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 3.660 · Total 3.660
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall3.6603.6601.4%
Pass3.6603.6603.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs3.6603.6602.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Josh Smith · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.655 · Total -1.310
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.655-1.3101.3%
Pass-0.534-0.5341.4%
Rush-0.776-0.7761.3%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.534-0.5342.0%
3rd down-0.776-0.7763.3%
Standard downs-0.776-0.7760.9%
Passing downs-0.534-0.5342.6%
Where Tulsa sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.184 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.406 (27th percentile; 138 teams)27thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.272 (72nd percentile; 138 teams)72ndOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.207 (44th percentile; 138 teams)44thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.207 (87th percentile; 138 teams)87thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.061 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.407 (49th percentile; 138 teams)49thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.195 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61stDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.120 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7th
Values and percentiles
Tulsa metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.18464th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40627th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.27272nd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.20744th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.20787th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.06155th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.40749th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.19561st138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.1207th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 256 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.7 yards (54th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.7 per completion. Completion 61.7%, 6.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.22.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense62.7%61.2%+1.5193 / 256
Defense allowed63.1%61.3%+1.8179 / 227

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Tulsa.

Target mix by zone, Tulsa offense
Short left33% · 83Short middle19% · 46Short right34% · 85Deep left7% · 17Deep middle2% · 6Deep right4% · 11

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Tulsa passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense25699%8.74.761.7%0.22+1.5 pp193
Passing defense22799%8.15.860.4%0.19+1.8 pp179

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2664.842.7%0.253.201.101.4012.1%76.7%
Defense allowed3614.641.2%0.123.101.001.4015.2%61.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense262 / 2662531310680247 / 248 · 99.6%
Defense allowed355 / 361352916330339 / 342 · 99.1%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.5 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-11.72.817.2W1W1 vs Oklahoma State: +10.8 ppW2W2 vs Sam Houston: -11.7 ppW3W4W4 vs Arkansas: -0.3 ppW5W5 vs North Texas: -5.5 ppW6W7W7 vs Rice: +17.2 ppW8W8 vs Army: +6.0 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Oklahoma State242470.8%60.1%+10.8 pp9.30.41334.10.07
W2Sam Houston333348.5%60.2%-11.7 pp9.4-0.26406.00.51
W3East Texas A&M260———8.80.25446.70.44
W4Arkansas323262.5%62.8%-0.3 pp8.7-0.08223.30.09
W5North Texas434358.1%63.6%-5.5 pp6.80.15373.90.31
W6Navy370———10.40.30283.50.10
W7Rice272774.1%56.9%+17.2 pp9.40.78364.2-0.02
W8Army343467.6%61.7%+6.0 pp7.60.38265.70.43

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

37 punts · 41.8 gross yards/punt · 38.5 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 37/37 punts. Known net yards: 31/37 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 4.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Army431.827.84/4
Week 7 · Rice244.044.02/2
Week 6 · Navy339.733.01/3
Week 5 · North Texas842.939.26/8
Week 4 · Arkansas744.443.86/7
Team style
Rating history