Record
6-1 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
SP+ workbook recordTexas Tech
2026 season
Big 12
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Texas Tech's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 18 across 8 systems; best 9, worst 25, so they disagree by 16 places.
- Lab EPA
- #25
- Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #18
- down 92026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #9
- down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #13
- down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #14
- down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #18
- down 6 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #23
- down 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #25
- down 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #19 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #70 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #48 of 138
- Game control
- #30 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #29 of 138
- Offense
- #59 of 138
- Defense
- #21 of 138
- Special teams
- #21 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Texas Tech · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
0.108 net EPA/play
#25
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
10.71 points
#18 · Down 9 places since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +14.72 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.46, schedule #77 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.38. That is worth +11.26 on its own; the preseason prior of +9.03 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +10.71.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Texas Tech · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · Abilene Christian home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856770 | +23.00 → +23.00 | -2.50 | 0.7637 | 9.44% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 1.935 | -2.359 | -0.425 |
| Week 2 · Oregon State away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856783 | +11.00 → +11.00 | +2.50 | 0.7937 | 9.81% | +7.09 | 1.324 | 0.696 | 2.020 |
| Week 3 · Houston home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856811 | +2.00 → +2.00 | -2.50 | 0.8249 | 10.19% | +9.98 | -0.051 | 1.018 | 0.967 |
| Week 4 · Sam Houston home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856805 | +35.00 → +35.00 | -2.50 | 0.8572 | 10.59% | -12.92 | 3.443 | -1.368 | 2.075 |
| Week 5 · Colorado away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401856821 | +22.00 → +22.00 | +2.50 | 0.8909 | 11.01% | -6.21 | 2.697 | -0.684 | 2.013 |
| Week 7 · Arizona State home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856828 | +28.00 → +28.00 | -2.50 | 0.9622 | 11.89% | -2.90 | 3.032 | -0.345 | 2.687 |
| Week 8 · Cincinnati away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856840 | -13.00 → -13.00 | +2.50 | 1.0000 | 12.36% | +3.52 | -1.297 | 0.434 | -0.863 |
Game terms +8.47 points; prior term +2.23 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +10.71 points. The preseason prior is +9.03 with 24.71% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
18.4 SP+ points
#9 · Down 2 places
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
14.99 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#18 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 5.00 on 373 plays; defense -10.00 on 386 plays.
2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Texas Tech 7 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 6-1 · conf 3-1 · home 4-0 · away 2-1 · expected wins 5.2
- Polls (Week 9)
- AP Top 25 #13 · Coaches Poll #14
- CFP latest
- not published
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 3-4 ATS (-6.4 avg) · 2025: 12-2 ATS (+8.0 avg)
- Head coach
- Joey McGuire · hired 2021-11-08 · 27-13 over 4 captured seasons
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #25 (236 pts) · 2025 #48 (202 pts) · 2026 #18 (250 pts)
- Returning
- 53% of production · 57% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing 27% 23% Receiving 57% 53% Rushing 99% 93% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 17 | 3.29 | 0.8826 | 15.00 |
| Defensive Line | 14 | 3.36 | 0.8884 | 12.44 |
| Linebacker | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8694 | 4.35 |
| Offensive Line | 19 | 3.32 | 0.8835 | 16.79 |
| Quarterback | 4 | 3.50 | 0.8892 | 3.56 |
| Receiver | 16 | 3.44 | 0.8912 | 14.26 |
| Running Back | 2 | 3.50 | 0.8910 | 1.78 |
| Special Teams | 11 | 3.09 | 0.8655 | 9.52 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Will Hammond · QBCFBD athlete 5126468. Texas Tech (2024–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.292 | 179 | 49.9% | Pass 96.3% · Rush 12.3%1st 47.5% · 2nd 48.8% · 3rd 58.9% Standard downs 43.6% · Passing downs 65.2% | 2024: 4★ · 0.9173 |
J'Koby Williams · RBCFBD athlete 5086393. Texas Tech (2024–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.278 | 75 | 22.7% | Pass 12.1% · Rush 33.2%1st 27.1% · 2nd 22.8% · 3rd 12.2% Standard downs 25.3% · Passing downs 16.3% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8878 |
Quinten Joyner · RBCFBD athlete 4917949. USC (2023–2024); Texas Tech (2025–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.135 | 46 | 11.5% | Pass 0.9% · Rush 21.3%1st 10.4% · 2nd 12.3% · 3rd 11.1% Standard downs 13.7% · Passing downs 6.4% | 2023: 4★ · 0.9272 |
Cameron Dickey · RBCFBD athlete 5193580. Texas Tech (2024–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.274 | 44 | 17.9% | Pass 4.7% · Rush 29.8%1st 19.0% · 2nd 18.4% · 3rd 14.5% Standard downs 20.7% · Passing downs 11.1% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8838 |
Will Hammond · QBCFBD athlete 5126468. Texas Tech (2024–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.298 | 31 | 49.9% | Pass 96.3% · Rush 12.3%1st 47.5% · 2nd 48.8% · 3rd 58.9% Standard downs 43.6% · Passing downs 65.2% | 2024: 4★ · 0.9173 |
Stone Harrington · PKCFBD athlete 5103116. Texas Tech (2024–2026) | Kicker PAAR | 5.190 | 18 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | Not linked |
Ashton Rowden · RBCFBD athlete 5290564. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.6% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.7%1st 4.4% · 2nd 4.6% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 1.9% | Not linked |
Bryson Jones · WRCFBD athlete 5195409. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.8% · 2nd 0.8% · 3rd 3.0% Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 1.9% | Not linked |
Chase Campbell · WRCFBD athlete 5217186. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.1% | Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.6% Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 2.4% | Not linked |
Coy Eakin · WRCFBD athlete 4916941. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.4% | Pass 14.0% · Rush 0.4%1st 6.3% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 10.0% Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 8.5% | Not linked |
Donte Lee Jr · WRCFBD athlete 5220256. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.0% | Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.2% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 2.4% Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 1.4% | Not linked |
Jalen Jones · WRCFBD athlete 5227057. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.5% | Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 2.0% Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 3.8% | Not linked |
Jett Carpenter · TECFBD athlete 4695195. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.3% | Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.6%1st 1.3% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 3.3% Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 1.1% | Not linked |
Kenny Johnson · WRCFBD athlete 4923295. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 10.3% | Pass 23.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 10.9% · 2nd 10.5% · 3rd 10.0% Standard downs 9.3% · Passing downs 12.8% | Not linked |
Kirk Francis · QBCFBD athlete 5151618. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.3% | Not linked |
Leyton Stone · WRCFBD athlete 5186738. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.3% | Not linked |
Malcolm Simmons · WRCFBD athlete 5079691. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.6% | Pass 4.3% · Rush 1.4%1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 4.3% Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 2.9% | Not linked |
Matt Ludwig · TECFBD athlete 5209381. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.8% | Pass 6.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.1% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 1.9% Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 3.4% | Not linked |
Micah Hudson · WRCFBD athlete 5079492. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.3% | Pass 9.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 5.4% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 3.3% Standard downs 4.9% · Passing downs 2.8% | Not linked |
Terrance Carter · TECFBD athlete 4867887. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 8.2% | Pass 16.1% · Rush 1.7%1st 6.4% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 17.2% Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 13.5% | Not linked |
Thomas Castellanos · QBCFBD athlete 4773919. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.0% | Pass 4.3% · Rush 9.0%1st 6.4% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 12.0% Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 10.0% | Not linked |
Transfers
Incoming · 23 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Trick · EDGE | Miami (OH) | 2026-01-07 | 4★ / 0.9000 | Immediate |
| Amarie Fleming · EDGE | Not reported | 2025-11-19 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Austin Romaine · LB | Kansas State | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Brendan Sorsby · QB | Cincinnati | 2026-01-05 | 5★ / 0.9800 | Immediate |
| Bryce Butler · DL | Washington | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Corey Platt Jr. · LB | Houston | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8800 | Immediate |
| Davin Martin · CB | UTSA | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Donte Lee Jr. · WR | Liberty | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jacob Hand · K | Texas Tech | 2026-01-11 | — / — | Immediate |
| Jalen Jones · WR | Alabama State | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jamond Mathis · EDGE | Kent State | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Jett Carpenter · TE | Nevada | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Jojo Johnson · DL | Oregon State | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jordan Church · IOL | Louisville | 2026-01-15 | 4★ / 0.9100 | Immediate |
| Jordan Rogers · S | Pittsburg State | 2026-05-03 | — / — | Immediate |
| Julien Laventure · DL | Akron | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Kenny Johnson · WR | Pittsburgh | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Kirk Francis · QB | Tulsa | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Malcolm Simmons · WR | Auburn | 2026-01-12 | 4★ / 0.9100 | Immediate |
| Mateen Ibirogba · DL | Wake Forest | 2026-01-07 | 4★ / 0.9600 | Immediate |
| Thomas Castellanos · QB | Florida State | 2026-08-21 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Trey White · EDGE | San Diego State | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Will Karoll · P | UCLA | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
Outgoing · 21 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amier Washington · DL | UCLA | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Braylon Rigsby · DL | Oklahoma State | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Chapman Lewis · S | Utah State | 2026-01-19 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Cheta Ofili · EDGE | TCU | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Deante Lindsay · CB | Abilene Christian | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Dylan Spencer · EDGE | UTSA | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Eddy Smith · DL | UTSA | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jacob Hand · K | Texas Tech | 2026-01-11 | — / — | Immediate |
| Justin Horne · LB | Not reported | 2025-12-25 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Kasen Long · DL | Utah State | 2026-01-27 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Kelby Valsin · WR | Not reported | 2025-12-26 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Macho Stevenson · CB | Tulane | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Maurion Horn · CB | Oklahoma State | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Mitch Griffis · QB | East Carolina | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Preztynn Harrison · WR | Howard Payne | 2026-01-19 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Price Morgan · WR | Incarnate Word | 2026-01-12 | — / — | Immediate |
| Roy Alexander · WR | Not reported | 2026-01-05 | — / — | Immediate |
| T.J. West · WR | UTSA | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Trey Jackson · TE | SMU | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Tyson Turner · WR | Houston | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Upton Bellenfant · K | South Carolina | 2026-01-08 | — / — | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Texas Tech. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Joey McGuire · career 35–18 across 5 seasons and 1 schools
Tenure timeline · 15 appointments
2022–present · Joey McGuire · active at capture
35–18 · 53 attributed games · 5 seasons
Hired 2021-11-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2021–2021 · Sonny Cumbie
2–3 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2021-10-25. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2019–2021 · Matt Wells
13–17 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2018-11-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2013–2018 · Kliff Kingsbury
35–40 · 75 attributed games · 6 seasons
Hired 2012-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2010–2012 · Tommy Tuberville
20–17 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons
Hired 2009-12-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2000–2009 · Mike Leach
84–43 · 127 attributed games · 10 seasons
Hired 1999-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.
1986–1999 · Spike Dykes
82–67–1 · 150 attributed games · 14 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1981–1985 · Jerry Moore
16–37–2 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1978–1980 · Rex Dockery
15–16–2 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1975–1977 · Steve Sloan
23–12 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1970–1974 · Jim Carlen
37–20–2 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1961–1969 · J.T. King
44–45–3 · 92 attributed games · 9 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1951–1960 · DeWitt Weaver
49–51–5 · 105 attributed games · 10 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1946–1950 · Dell Morgan
31–24 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1932–1940 · Pete Cawthon
67–23–6 · 96 attributed games · 9 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Joey McGuire · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | 21.9 | 13.1 | 18 | — |
| 2025 · Joey McGuire | 12–2 | 8–1 | 0–1 | 27.6 | 22.3 | 48 | 7 |
| 2024 · Joey McGuire | 8–5 | 6–3 | 0–1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 25 | — |
| 2023 · Joey McGuire | 7–6 | 5–4 | 1–0 | 6.1 | 7.3 | 28 | — |
| 2022 · Joey McGuire | 8–5 | 5–4 | 1–0 | 8.5 | 9.7 | 43 | — |
| 2021 · Matt Wells · incomplete attribution | 5–3 | — | — | 9.8 | -1.7 | 64 | — |
| 2021 · Sonny Cumbie · incomplete attribution | 2–3 | — | — | 9.8 | -1.7 | 64 | — |
| 2020 · Matt Wells | 4–6 | 3–6 | 0–0 | -4.2 | -1.4 | 49 | — |
| 2019 · Matt Wells | 4–8 | 2–7 | 0–0 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 61 | — |
| 2018 · Kliff Kingsbury | 5–7 | 3–6 | 0–0 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 72 | — |
| 2017 · Kliff Kingsbury | 6–7 | 3–6 | 0–1 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 49 | — |
| 2016 · Kliff Kingsbury | 5–7 | 3–6 | 0–0 | 3.7 | 1 | 44 | — |
| 2015 · Kliff Kingsbury | 7–6 | 4–5 | 0–1 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 32 | — |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data
Stat rankings
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-24 19:49:20 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 56 / 138 | 59.9 | 17 / 138 | 88.3 |
| Success rate | 32 / 138 | 77.4 | 42 / 138 | 70.1 |
| Explosiveness | 130 / 138 | 5.8 | 106 / 138 | 23.4 |
| Standard-down success | 32 / 138 | 77.4 | 24 / 138 | 83.2 |
| Passing-down success | 35 / 138 | 75.2 | 99 / 138 | 28.5 |
| Pass PPA | 43 / 138 | 69.3 | 22 / 138 | 84.7 |
| Rush PPA | 36 / 138 | 74.5 | 30 / 138 | 78.8 |
| Pass explosiveness | 131 / 138 | 5.1 | 46 / 138 | 67.2 |
| Rush explosiveness | 94 / 138 | 32.1 | 69 / 138 | 50.4 |
| Line yards | 36 / 138 | 74.5 | 65 / 138 | 53.3 |
| Second-level yards | 14 / 138 | 90.5 | 81 / 138 | 41.6 |
| Open-field yards | 26 / 138 | 81.8 | 56 / 138 | 59.9 |
| Stuff rate | 90 / 138 | 35.0 | 56 / 138 | 59.9 |
| Power success | 100 / 138 | 27.7 | 13 / 138 | 91.2 |
| Havoc | T131 / 138 | 4.7 | T39 / 138 | 71.5 |
| Front-seven havoc | T118 / 138 | 14.2 | T80 / 138 | 41.2 |
| DB havoc | 129 / 138 | 6.6 | T11 / 138 | 92.0 |
| Points / opportunity | 55 / 138 | 60.6 | 26 / 138 | 81.8 |
| Average field position | T11 / 138 | 92.0 | 16 / 138 | 89.1 |
| Field-position expected points | 9 / 138 | 94.2 | 23 / 138 | 83.9 |
Player PPA and usage
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
Will Hammond · QBUsage 49.9% · Avg PPA 0.236 · Total 57.220
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.236 | 57.220 | 49.9% |
| Pass | 0.293 | 60.744 | 96.3% |
| Rush | 0.408 | 12.650 | 12.3% |
| 1st down | 0.141 | 14.847 | 47.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.250 | 19.781 | 48.8% |
| 3rd down | 0.568 | 30.081 | 58.9% |
| Standard downs | 0.137 | 20.548 | 43.6% |
| Passing downs | 0.399 | 36.673 | 65.2% |
J'Koby Williams · RBUsage 22.7% · Avg PPA 0.208 · Total 22.843
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.208 | 22.843 | 22.7% |
| Pass | 0.277 | 7.211 | 12.1% |
| Rush | 0.186 | 15.632 | 33.2% |
| 1st down | 0.173 | 10.391 | 27.1% |
| 2nd down | 0.170 | 6.284 | 22.8% |
| 3rd down | 0.900 | 9.904 | 12.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.196 | 17.080 | 25.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.251 | 5.763 | 16.3% |
Cameron Dickey · RBUsage 17.9% · Avg PPA 0.206 · Total 12.595
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.206 | 12.595 | 17.9% |
| Pass | 0.041 | 0.290 | 4.7% |
| Rush | 0.228 | 12.305 | 29.8% |
| 1st down | -0.050 | -1.511 | 19.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.223 | 4.679 | 18.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.738 | 6.640 | 14.5% |
| Standard downs | 0.206 | 10.281 | 20.7% |
| Passing downs | 0.210 | 2.314 | 11.1% |
Quinten Joyner · RBUsage 11.5% · Avg PPA 0.003 · Total 0.177
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.003 | 0.177 | 11.5% |
| Pass | 1.450 | 2.901 | 0.9% |
| Rush | -0.050 | -2.723 | 21.3% |
| 1st down | -0.069 | -1.591 | 10.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.243 | 4.860 | 12.3% |
| 3rd down | -0.088 | -0.876 | 11.1% |
| Standard downs | -0.021 | -0.992 | 13.7% |
| Passing downs | 0.130 | 1.169 | 6.4% |
Kenny Johnson · WRUsage 10.3% · Avg PPA 0.648 · Total 32.419
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.648 | 32.419 | 10.3% |
| Pass | 0.648 | 32.419 | 23.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.422 | 10.130 | 10.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.371 | 6.304 | 10.5% |
| 3rd down | 1.776 | 15.985 | 10.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.382 | 12.215 | 9.3% |
| Passing downs | 1.122 | 20.204 | 12.8% |
Terrance Carter · TEUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA 0.215 · Total 6.008
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.215 | 6.008 | 8.2% |
| Pass | 0.169 | 4.223 | 16.1% |
| Rush | 0.595 | 1.785 | 1.7% |
| 1st down | 0.027 | 0.272 | 6.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.711 | 4.263 | 5.3% |
| 3rd down | 0.307 | 3.382 | 17.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.207 | 3.105 | 6.1% |
| Passing downs | 0.223 | 2.904 | 13.5% |
Thomas Castellanos · QBUsage 7.0% · Avg PPA 0.468 · Total 8.893
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.468 | 8.893 | 7.0% |
| Pass | 1.623 | 8.113 | 4.3% |
| Rush | 0.340 | 4.426 | 9.0% |
| 1st down | -0.008 | -0.064 | 6.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.236 | 1.182 | 5.6% |
| 3rd down | 1.296 | 7.775 | 12.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.065 | -0.720 | 5.8% |
| Passing downs | 1.202 | 9.613 | 10.0% |
Coy Eakin · WRUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA 0.443 · Total 13.732
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.443 | 13.732 | 6.4% |
| Pass | 0.551 | 16.530 | 14.0% |
| Rush | -2.798 | -2.798 | 0.4% |
| 1st down | 0.482 | 6.754 | 6.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.857 | 6.855 | 4.9% |
| 3rd down | 0.014 | 0.123 | 10.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.543 | 10.314 | 5.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.285 | 3.418 | 8.5% |
Micah Hudson · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.062 · Total 1.296
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.062 | 1.296 | 4.3% |
| Pass | 0.062 | 1.296 | 9.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.114 | 1.367 | 5.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.615 | 3.075 | 3.1% |
| 3rd down | 0.296 | 0.888 | 3.3% |
| Standard downs | -0.159 | -2.709 | 4.9% |
| Passing downs | 1.001 | 4.006 | 2.8% |
Ashton Rowden · RBUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.012 · Total 0.087
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.012 | 0.087 | 3.6% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.012 | 0.087 | 6.7% |
| 1st down | 0.426 | 1.705 | 4.4% |
| 2nd down | -0.539 | -1.618 | 4.6% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.052 | 0.311 | 4.2% |
| Passing downs | -0.224 | -0.224 | 1.9% |
Matt Ludwig · TEUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.360 · Total 2.882
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.360 | 2.882 | 2.8% |
| Pass | 0.360 | 2.882 | 6.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.172 | 0.690 | 3.1% |
| 2nd down | -0.237 | -0.711 | 3.1% |
| 3rd down | 2.903 | 2.903 | 1.9% |
| Standard downs | 0.084 | 0.421 | 2.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.820 | 2.460 | 3.4% |
Malcolm Simmons · WRUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 1.703 · Total 11.921
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.703 | 11.921 | 2.6% |
| Pass | 2.075 | 10.375 | 4.3% |
| Rush | 0.773 | 1.546 | 1.4% |
| 1st down | -0.340 | -0.679 | 1.6% |
| 2nd down | 2.891 | 5.782 | 2.2% |
| 3rd down | 2.675 | 5.351 | 4.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.020 | 0.101 | 2.5% |
| Passing downs | 5.910 | 11.820 | 2.9% |
Jalen Jones · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.231 · Total 1.615
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.231 | 1.615 | 2.5% |
| Pass | 0.231 | 1.615 | 5.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.119 | 0.477 | 3.1% |
| 2nd down | 0.674 | 1.348 | 2.1% |
| 3rd down | -0.210 | -0.210 | 2.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.119 | 0.477 | 2.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.379 | 1.138 | 3.8% |
Jett Carpenter · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.677 · Total 5.416
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.677 | 5.416 | 2.3% |
| Pass | 0.304 | 2.130 | 4.5% |
| Rush | 3.287 | 3.287 | 0.6% |
| 1st down | -0.204 | -0.408 | 1.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.567 | 2.267 | 3.5% |
| 3rd down | 1.778 | 3.557 | 3.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.735 | 5.146 | 2.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.270 | 0.270 | 1.1% |
Chase Campbell · WRUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.342 · Total 1.027
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.342 | 1.027 | 2.1% |
| Pass | 0.342 | 1.027 | 4.5% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.248 | -0.495 | 3.2% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | 1.522 | 1.522 | 3.6% |
| Standard downs | -0.248 | -0.495 | 2.0% |
| Passing downs | 1.522 | 1.522 | 2.4% |
Donte Lee Jr · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.244 · Total -0.974
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.244 | -0.974 | 2.0% |
| Pass | -0.244 | -0.974 | 4.6% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.009 | 0.017 | 2.2% |
| 2nd down | 0.352 | 0.352 | 1.5% |
| 3rd down | -1.344 | -1.344 | 2.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.123 | 0.370 | 2.3% |
| Passing downs | -1.344 | -1.344 | 1.4% |
Bryson Jones · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.609 · Total 3.653
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.609 | 3.653 | 1.7% |
| Pass | 0.609 | 3.653 | 3.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.105 | 0.314 | 1.8% |
| 2nd down | 3.233 | 3.233 | 0.8% |
| 3rd down | 0.053 | 0.106 | 3.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.237 | 0.949 | 1.6% |
| Passing downs | 1.352 | 2.704 | 1.9% |
Kirk Francis · QBUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.102 · Total -0.102
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.102 | -0.102 | 1.4% |
| Pass | -0.102 | -0.102 | 3.0% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.102 | -0.102 | 3.8% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | -0.102 | -0.102 | 6.3% |
Leyton Stone · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.102 · Total -0.102
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.102 | -0.102 | 1.4% |
| Pass | -0.102 | -0.102 | 3.0% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.102 | -0.102 | 3.8% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | -0.102 | -0.102 | 6.3% |
2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.170 | 60th138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.472 | 77th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.098 | 6th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | 0.302 | 69th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.166 | 74th138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | -0.045 | 88th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.382 | 70th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.292 | 23rd138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.171 | 69th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 211 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.8 yards (57th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.7 per completion. Completion 67.3%, 7.5 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.29.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 65.3% | 60.5% | +4.8 | 176 / 211 |
| Defense allowed | 63.9% | 62.5% | +1.5 | 244 / 282 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Texas Tech.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 211 | 100% | 8.8 | 4.7 | 67.3% | 0.29 | +4.8 pp | 176 |
| Passing defense | 282 | 98% | 8.0 | 4.9 | 62.8% | 0.04 | +1.5 pp | 244 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 265 | 5.1 | 49.8% | 0.17 | 3.20 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 17.4% | 68.6% |
| Defense allowed | 212 | 3.5 | 35.4% | -0.02 | 2.90 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 18.0% | 58.3% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 258 / 265 | 257 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 250 / 253 · 98.8% |
| Defense allowed | 211 / 212 | 208 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 189 / 189 · 100.0% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +4.8 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Abilene Christian | 34 | 0 | — | — | — | 6.7 | 0.42 | 39 | 4.4 | 0.17 |
| W2 | Oregon State | 28 | 27 | 74.1% | 64.6% | +9.5 pp | 6.5 | 0.64 | 47 | 3.5 | 0.12 |
| W3 | Houston | 28 | 28 | 60.7% | 58.2% | +2.5 pp | 12.6 | 0.33 | 32 | 5.3 | 0.29 |
| W4 | Sam Houston | 31 | 31 | 58.1% | 60.5% | -2.5 pp | 9.6 | 0.27 | 35 | 6.4 | 0.40 |
| W5 | Colorado | 26 | 26 | 65.4% | 61.5% | +3.9 pp | 8.4 | -0.06 | 38 | 4.8 | -0.15 |
| W7 | Arizona State | 27 | 27 | 70.4% | 58.1% | +12.2 pp | 9.7 | 0.50 | 37 | 6.8 | 0.28 |
| W8 | Cincinnati | 37 | 37 | 64.9% | 60.3% | +4.6 pp | 8.6 | -0.01 | 37 | 5.3 | 0.12 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
23 punts · 48.2 gross yards/punt · 43.2 net yards/punt
5 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 23/23 punts. Known net yards: 16/23 punts.
Our punt returns
14 returns · 10.5 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
3 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 14/14 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 · Cincinnati | 3 | 31.3 | 32.5 | 2/3 |
| Week 7 · Arizona State | 1 | 65.0 | — | 0/1 |
| Week 5 · Colorado | 3 | 55.7 | 34.0 | 1/3 |
| Week 4 · Sam Houston | 4 | 48.8 | 47.8 | 4/4 |
| Week 3 · Houston | 3 | 58.7 | 39.5 | 2/3 |