Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Texas

2026 season

SEC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Texas's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 9 across 8 systems; best 8, worst 40, so they disagree by 32 places.

Lab EPA
#28
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#9
up 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#8
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#9
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#8
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#40
up 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#8
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#28
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#12 of 138
Schedule strength
#4 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#19 of 138
Game control
#6 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#8 of 138
Offense
#37 of 138
Defense
#2 of 138
Special teams
#91 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Texas · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

5-2 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.096 net EPA/play

#28

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

13.57 points

#9 · Up 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +6.94 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +9.35, schedule #1 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +16.29 on its own; the preseason prior of +5.24 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +13.57.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Texas · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Texas State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856667
+52.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.40%+2.153.0540.2023.256
Week 2 · Ohio State
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856682
+1.00 → +1.00-2.500.79379.77%+19.19-0.1461.8741.727
Week 3 · UTSA
home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401856693
+24.00 → +24.00-2.500.824910.15%+3.692.1820.3742.556
Week 4 · Tennessee
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856704
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.857210.55%+11.950.5801.2601.840
Week 6 · Oklahoma
neutral · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856717
-3.00 → -3.000.000.925911.39%+6.47-0.3420.7370.395
Week 7 · Florida
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856724
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.962211.84%+7.43-0.6510.8800.229
Week 8 · Ole Miss
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856732
+7.00 → +7.00-2.501.000012.30%+14.020.5541.7252.278

Game terms +12.28 points; prior term +1.29 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +13.57 points. The preseason prior is +5.24 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

20.4 SP+ points

#8 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

7.36 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#40 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -5.03 on 442 plays; defense -12.40 on 436 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Texas 19 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
5-2 · conf 2-2 · home 4-1 · away 1-0 · expected wins 4.0
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #11 · Coaches Poll #11
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-5 ATS (-1.4 avg) · 2025: 5-8 ATS (-2.1 avg)
Head coach
Steve Sarkisian · hired 2021-01-02 · 35-8 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #6 (287 pts) · 2025 #1 (312 pts) · 2026 #7 (291 pts)
Returning
72% of production · 58% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing85%98%
Receiving55%42%
Rushing126%28%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back174.180.944016.05
Defensive Line193.950.933917.74
Linebacker104.000.91679.17
Offensive Line153.600.901313.52
Quarterback44.500.95763.83
Receiver183.890.927916.70
Running Back83.880.92257.38
Special Teams93.440.88447.96

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Arch Manning · QB

CFBD athlete 4870906. Texas (2023–2026)

Passing WEPA0.36722252.6%
Pass 96.3% · Rush 15.6%

1st 49.8% · 2nd 47.4% · 3rd 66.3%

Standard downs 44.5% · Passing downs 70.2%

2023: 5★ · 0.9995
Raleek Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 4685268. Arizona State (2024–2025); USC (2022–2023); Texas (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1828920.0%
Pass 5.5% · Rush 33.6%

1st 22.1% · 2nd 26.0% · 3rd 8.2%

Standard downs 22.3% · Passing downs 15.2%

2021: 4★ · 0.9332
Daylan Smothers · RB

CFBD athlete 4871053. NC State (2024–2025); Oklahoma (2023–2023); Texas (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1646622.2%
Pass 8.0% · Rush 36.0%

1st 24.2% · 2nd 16.4% · 3rd 27.8%

Standard downs 27.8% · Passing downs 9.4%

2023: 4★ · 0.8959
Arch Manning · QB

CFBD athlete 4870906. Texas (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1634152.6%
Pass 96.3% · Rush 15.6%

1st 49.8% · 2nd 47.4% · 3rd 66.3%

Standard downs 44.5% · Passing downs 70.2%

2023: 5★ · 0.9995
Gianni Spetic · PK

CFBD athlete 5092217. Ohio (2023–2024); Memphis (2025–2025); Texas (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR6.32012—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: 3★ · 0.8083
Cam Coleman · WR

CFBD athlete 5079376. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 15.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
Daylan Mccutcheon · WR

CFBD athlete 5141575. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Derrek Cooper · RB

CFBD athlete 5203606. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 1.3% · Rush 15.2%

1st 9.1% · 2nd 11.2% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 10.7% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Emaree Winston · TE

CFBD athlete 5141757. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 8.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Emmett Mosley V · WR

CFBD athlete 5079613. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 15.1% · Rush 0.4%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 8.2%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
James Simon · RB

CFBD athlete 5141686. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.9%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 3.9%

Not linked
Jermaine Bishop Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5161011. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 10.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 7.3%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Kaliq Lockett · WR

CFBD athlete 5141524. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Karle Lacey Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5141509. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.5%
Pass 11.4% · Rush 2.4%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 5.9% · Passing downs 7.8%

Not linked
Michael Masunas · TE

CFBD athlete 4816104. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked
Michael Terry III · RB

CFBD athlete 5141729. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 14.6%

1st 9.8% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 9.9% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Nick Townsend · TE

CFBD athlete 5195299. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Ryan Niblett · RB

CFBD athlete 4899367. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 1.5% · Rush 2.6%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Ryan Wingo · WR

CFBD athlete 5218633. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.2%
Pass 21.5% · Rush 0.8%

1st 9.9% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 10.2%

Standard downs 9.5% · Passing downs 11.9%

Not linked
Spencer Shannon · TE

CFBD athlete 4921318. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 2.1%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Sterling Berkhalter · WR

CFBD athlete 4882122. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 22 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Bo Mascoe · CBRutgers2026-01-074★ / 0.9100Immediate
Cam Coleman · WRAuburn2026-01-115★ / 0.9800Immediate
Darius Snow · LBMichigan State2026-04-163★ / 0.8500TBD
Dylan Sikorski · IOLOregon State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gianni Spetic · KMemphis2026-01-042★ / —Immediate
Hollywood Smothers · RBNC State2026-01-114★ / 0.9400Immediate
Ian Geffrard · DLArkansas2026-01-044★ / 0.9200Immediate
Jonte Newman · OTTexas A&M2026-01-143★ / 0.8700Immediate
Justin Cryer · LBFlorida State2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Laurence Seymore III · IOLWestern Kentucky2026-01-153★ / 0.8700Immediate
MJ Morris · QBCoastal Carolina2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mac Chiumento · PFlorida State2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Markus Boswell · LBAkron2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Melvin Siani · OTWake Forest2026-01-154★ / 0.9300Immediate
Michael Masunas · TEMichigan State2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nick Hudson · CBBrown2026-04-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Paris Patterson · IOLSMU2026-03-313★ / 0.8600Immediate
Raleek Brown · RBArizona State2026-01-084★ / 0.9200Immediate
Rasheem Biles · LBPittsburgh2026-01-114★ / 0.9300Immediate
Sterling Berkhalter · WRWake Forest2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Trey Dubuc · LSNew Mexico2026-01-042★ / —Immediate
Zion Williams · DLLSU2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 28 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aaron Butler · WRNot reported2025-12-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
CJ Baxter · RBKentucky2026-01-113★ / 0.8900Immediate
Caleb Chester · CBArizona State2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Christian Clark · RBSouth Carolina2026-01-163★ / 0.8800Immediate
Colin Page · RBNorth Texas2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Connor Stroh · IOLKansas2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Daniel Cruz · IOLNC State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
DeAndre Moore Jr. · WRColorado2026-01-134★ / 0.9400Immediate
Derek Williams Jr. · SNot reported2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Withdrawn
Elijah Barnes · LBKentucky2026-01-114★ / 0.9000Immediate
Graham Gillespie · SNorth Texas2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Jaime Ffrench Jr. · WRMichigan2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jerrick Gibson · RBPurdue2026-01-043★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jordan Washington · TENorth Carolina2026-01-113★ / 0.8800Immediate
Kobe Black · CBNot reported2026-01-094★ / —Immediate
Lavon Johnson · DLMaryland2026-01-113★ / 0.8800Immediate
Liona Lefau · LBColorado2026-01-084★ / 0.9000Immediate
Melvin Hills III · DLUConn2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nate Kibble · IOLBaylor2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Neto Umeozulu · IOLNorth Texas2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nick Brooks · IOLAlabama2026-01-144★ / 0.9200Immediate
Parker Livingstone · WROklahoma2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Quintrevion Wisner · RBFlorida State2026-01-054★ / 0.9300Immediate
Rickey Stewart Jr. · RBStephen F. Austin2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Santana Wilson · CBLouisville2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Trey Owens · QBArkansas State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Warren Roberson · SNot reported2026-01-164★ / —Withdrawn
Will Stone · KUCF2026-01-102★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Texas. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Steve Sarkisian · career 91–53 across 12 seasons and 3 schools

Tenure timeline · 24 appointments
  1. 2021–present · Steve Sarkisian · active at capture

    48–20 · 68 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2021-01-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2017–2020 · Tom Herman

    32–18 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2016-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2014–2016 · Charlie Strong

    16–21 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2014-01-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1998–2013 · Mack Brown

    158–48 · 206 attributed games · 16 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1992–1997 · John Mackovic

    41–28–2 · 71 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1987–1991 · David McWilliams

    31–26 · 57 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1977–1986 · Fred Akers

    86–31–2 · 119 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1957–1976 · Darrell Royal

    167–47–5 · 219 attributed games · 20 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1951–1956 · Edwin Price

    33–27–1 · 61 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1947–1950 · Blair Cherry

    32–10–1 · 43 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1937–1946 · Dana Bible

    63–31–3 · 97 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1934–1936 · Jack Chevigny

    13–14–2 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1927–1933 · Clyde Littlefield

    44–18–6 · 68 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1923–1926 · Edward Stewart

    24–9–3 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1920–1922 · Berry Whitaker

    22–3–1 · 26 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1917–1919 · William Juneau

    19–7 · 26 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1916–1916 · Conrad Van Gent

    7–2 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1911–1915 · Dave Allerdice

    33–7 · 40 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1910–1910 · Bill Wasmund

    6–2 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1909–1909 · Dexter Draper

    4–3–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1907–1908 · W.E. Metzenthin

    11–5–1 · 17 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1906–1906 · H.R. Schenker

    9–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1903–1905 · Ralph Hutchinson

    16–7–2 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1902–1902 · J.B. Hart

    6–3–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Steve Sarkisian · incomplete attribution0–0——21.119.47—
2025 · Steve Sarkisian10–36–21–016.212.6112
2024 · Steve Sarkisian13–37–22–124.119.464
2023 · Steve Sarkisian12–29–10–123.22233
2022 · Steve Sarkisian8–56–30–123.117.1525
2021 · Steve Sarkisian5–73–60–08.53.917—
2020 · Tom Herman7–35–31–09.713.3919
2019 · Tom Herman8–55–41–01216325
2018 · Tom Herman10–47–31–011.312.13—
2017 · Tom Herman7–65–41–010.611.125—
2016 · Charlie Strong5–73–60–010.62.67—
2015 · Charlie Strong5–74–50–03.72.310—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 23:13:54 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play101 / 13827.026 / 13881.8
Success rate75 / 13846.016 / 13889.1
Explosiveness95 / 13831.422 / 13884.7
Standard-down success89 / 13835.817 / 13888.3
Passing-down success51 / 13863.515 / 13889.8
Pass PPA68 / 13851.128 / 13880.3
Rush PPA108 / 13821.924 / 13883.2
Pass explosiveness46 / 13867.223 / 13883.9
Rush explosiveness111 / 13819.721 / 13885.4
Line yards117 / 13815.311 / 13892.7
Second-level yards52 / 13862.824 / 13883.2
Open-field yards104 / 13824.845 / 13867.9
Stuff rateT101 / 13826.624 / 13883.2
Power success99 / 13828.5T67 / 13851.1
HavocT128 / 1386.911 / 13892.7
Front-seven havoc135 / 1382.2T23 / 13883.6
DB havoc43 / 13869.3T24 / 13882.5
Points / opportunityT22 / 13884.312 / 13892.0
Average field positionT57 / 13858.8T72 / 13847.1
Field-position expected points50 / 13864.2T73 / 13846.7

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Arch Manning · QBUsage 52.6% · Avg PPA 0.140 · Total 35.327
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.14035.32752.6%
Pass0.19841.80196.3%
Rush0.0431.66015.6%
1st down-0.082-8.64949.8%
2nd down0.21916.00347.4%
3rd down0.37924.62666.3%
Standard downs0.0010.20644.5%
Passing downs0.33135.12170.2%
Daylan Smothers · RBUsage 22.2% · Avg PPA 0.139 · Total 10.679
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.13910.67922.2%
Pass0.6468.4028.0%
Rush0.0362.27736.0%
1st down0.0853.13024.2%
2nd down-0.101-1.81316.4%
3rd down0.59111.81927.8%
Standard downs0.0805.38327.8%
Passing downs0.5305.2969.4%
Raleek Brown · RBUsage 20.0% · Avg PPA -0.012 · Total -1.199
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.012-1.19920.0%
Pass-0.335-4.0175.5%
Rush0.0342.81833.6%
1st down-0.335-15.72322.1%
2nd down0.2359.39726.0%
3rd down0.4423.5348.2%
Standard downs-0.097-7.05522.3%
Passing downs0.2555.85515.2%
Ryan Wingo · WRUsage 10.2% · Avg PPA 0.623 · Total 30.512
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.62330.51210.2%
Pass0.73634.60721.5%
Rush-2.048-4.0950.8%
1st down0.47810.0319.9%
2nd down0.65510.48810.4%
3rd down1.25612.55710.2%
Standard downs0.36711.3629.5%
Passing downs1.06419.15011.9%
Derrek Cooper · RBUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA -0.025 · Total -0.759
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.025-0.7598.6%
Pass0.1030.2061.3%
Rush-0.034-0.96515.2%
1st down0.0110.1609.1%
2nd down-0.242-3.14711.2%
3rd down0.7432.2284.2%
Standard downs0.0380.96110.7%
Passing downs-0.344-1.7204.3%
Michael Terry III · RBUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 0.083 · Total 1.495
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0831.4958.0%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.0831.49514.6%
1st down0.2392.3899.8%
2nd down-0.238-1.4268.2%
3rd down0.2660.5324.3%
Standard downs0.1281.9159.9%
Passing downs-0.140-0.4204.0%
Emmett Mosley V · WRUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.487 · Total 16.545
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48716.5457.1%
Pass0.46915.49115.1%
Rush1.0541.0540.4%
1st down0.2212.8756.1%
2nd down0.4093.2725.2%
3rd down1.0628.4928.2%
Standard downs0.5118.6865.2%
Passing downs0.4627.85911.3%
Cam Coleman · WRUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA 0.750 · Total 24.740
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.75024.7406.9%
Pass0.75024.74015.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2923.5045.6%
2nd down0.81911.4619.1%
3rd down1.3969.7757.1%
Standard downs0.3265.8595.5%
Passing downs1.25918.8819.9%
Karle Lacey Jr. · QBUsage 6.5% · Avg PPA 0.542 · Total 5.423
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5425.4236.5%
Pass0.7686.14111.4%
Rush-0.359-0.7182.4%
1st down-0.424-1.6966.0%
2nd down1.4282.8564.0%
3rd down1.0664.26412.5%
Standard downs0.2881.7265.9%
Passing downs0.9243.6967.8%
Jermaine Bishop Jr. · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.220 · Total 4.174
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2204.1744.7%
Pass0.2204.17410.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.045-0.4485.6%
2nd down1.2403.7202.3%
3rd down0.1500.9017.3%
Standard downs0.1111.3364.4%
Passing downs0.4052.8385.4%
Michael Masunas · TEUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 1.141 · Total 3.423
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.1413.4234.1%
Pass1.1413.4239.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6280.6282.9%
2nd down1.3972.7948.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.6280.6282.0%
Passing downs1.3972.7948.3%
Nick Townsend · TEUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA -0.087 · Total -0.610
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.087-0.6103.8%
Pass-0.087-0.6107.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1850.3702.5%
2nd down-0.085-0.1713.3%
3rd down-0.270-0.8097.7%
Standard downs-0.205-1.0263.9%
Passing downs0.2080.4163.5%
Emaree Winston · TEUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.116 · Total 1.512
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1161.5123.6%
Pass0.1161.5128.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.539-3.2343.7%
2nd down0.5212.0853.4%
3rd down-0.266-0.5332.7%
Standard downs-0.539-3.2342.4%
Passing downs0.6784.7465.9%
James Simon · RBUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.632 · Total 2.529
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6322.5292.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.6322.5294.9%
1st down-0.258-0.2581.5%
2nd down1.8733.7464.0%
3rd down-0.958-0.9583.1%
Standard downs1.1752.3492.0%
Passing downs0.0900.1803.9%
Spencer Shannon · TEUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.063 · Total 0.315
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0630.3152.2%
Pass0.0630.3154.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4231.2682.9%
2nd down-0.579-0.5791.4%
3rd down-0.374-0.3742.1%
Standard downs0.4231.2681.9%
Passing downs-0.476-0.9532.7%
Ryan Niblett · RBUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.188 · Total -0.565
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.188-0.5652.1%
Pass-0.680-0.6801.5%
Rush0.0570.1152.6%
1st down-0.230-0.4593.1%
2nd down-0.106-0.1062.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.230-0.4592.1%
Passing downs-0.106-0.1062.1%
Sterling Berkhalter · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 1.918 · Total 5.753
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.9185.7532.0%
Pass1.9185.7534.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down2.3302.3302.0%
3rd down1.7113.4236.3%
Standard downs1.7113.4232.0%
Passing downs2.3302.3302.0%
Daylan Mccutcheon · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.918 · Total -0.918
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.918-0.9181.4%
Pass-0.918-0.9182.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.918-0.9186.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.918-0.9184.2%
Kaliq Lockett · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -1.714 · Total -1.714
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.714-1.7141.4%
Pass-1.714-1.7142.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.714-1.7143.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.714-1.7142.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Texas sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.065 (27th percentile; 138 teams)27thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.426 (46th percentile; 138 teams)46thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.192 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.219 (51st percentile; 138 teams)51stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.025 (22nd percentile; 138 teams)22ndDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.013 (82nd percentile; 138 teams)82ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.347 (89th percentile; 138 teams)89thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.131 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.198 (93rd percentile; 138 teams)93rd
Values and percentiles
Texas metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.06527th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.42646th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.19231st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.21951st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.02522nd138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.01382nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.34789th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.13185th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.19893rd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 206 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.5 yards (46th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.2 per completion. Completion 64.1%, 7.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.28.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense64.0%62.2%+1.8203 / 206
Defense allowed58.5%63.4%-4.9229 / 229

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Texas.

Target mix by zone, Texas offense
Short left34% · 67Short middle17% · 34Short right36% · 70Deep left5% · 10Deep middle4% · 8Deep right4% · 7

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Texas passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense20699%8.56.264.1%0.28+1.8 pp203
Passing defense229100%7.64.758.5%0.12-4.9 pp229

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2653.845.5%0.092.901.200.9017.8%67.4%
Defense allowed2453.235.1%-0.042.700.900.6018.9%71.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense262 / 265258719340242 / 242 · 100.0%
Defense allowed241 / 245237819440222 / 222 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.8 pp. 7 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-9.62.815.3W1W1 vs Texas State: +13.5 ppW2W2 vs Ohio State: -1.6 ppW3W3 vs UTSA: -9.6 ppW4W4 vs Tennessee: +15.3 ppW6W6 vs Oklahoma: +1.0 ppW7W7 vs Florida: +4.3 ppW8W8 vs Ole Miss: -2.6 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Texas State343275.0%61.5%+13.5 pp8.00.91364.30.14
W2Ohio State373762.2%63.8%-1.6 pp7.70.06413.40.14
W3UTSA353452.9%62.6%-9.6 pp6.20.03484.50.10
W4Tennessee191973.7%58.4%+15.3 pp11.70.53361.70.02
W6Oklahoma313161.3%60.3%+1.0 pp10.30.07323.80.01
W7Florida202070.0%65.7%+4.3 pp6.90.57303.3-0.28
W8Ole Miss303060.0%62.6%-2.6 pp9.6-0.02424.90.34

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

30 punts · 42.5 gross yards/punt · 38.3 net yards/punt

5 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 30/30 punts. Known net yards: 24/30 punts.

Our punt returns

18 returns · 10.9 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 18/18 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Ole Miss548.438.34/5
Week 7 · Florida442.341.34/4
Week 6 · Oklahoma836.543.86/8
Week 4 · Tennessee746.128.25/7
Week 3 · UTSA342.042.03/3
Team style
Rating history