Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Temple

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Temple's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 100.5 across 8 systems; best 83, worst 108, so they disagree by 25 places.

Lab EPA
#83
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#105
up 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#99
up 32026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#108
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#102
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#94
up 4 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#107
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#83
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#121 of 138
Schedule strength
#105 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#91 of 138
Game control
#98 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#106 of 138
Offense
#62 of 138
Defense
#125 of 138
Special teams
#117 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Temple · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.036 net EPA/play

#83

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-6.53 points

#105 · Up 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -3.79 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.73, schedule #80 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.64. That is worth -7.52 on its own; the preseason prior of -3.55 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -6.53.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Temple · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Rhode Island
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401862698
+24.00 → +24.00-2.500.76379.52%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.048-2.381-0.333
Week 2 · Penn State
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858442
-18.00 → -18.00-2.500.79379.90%+7.11-2.0290.704-1.325
Week 3 · Toledo
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401862774
-1.00 → -1.00 (OT)+2.500.824910.29%+1.380.1540.1420.297
Week 4 · Army
home · 2026-09-25 · ID 401862779
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.857210.69%+3.73-0.6950.399-0.296
Week 5 · South Florida
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862792
+4.00 → +4.00+2.500.890911.11%+3.080.7220.3431.065
Week 6 · UConn
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401861964
-14.00 → -14.00-2.500.925911.55%+0.47-1.9050.054-1.851
Week 7 · Charlotte
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862803
-7.00 → -7.00-2.500.962212.00%-17.17-1.140-2.060-3.200

Game terms -5.64 points; prior term -0.89 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -6.53 points. The preseason prior is -3.55 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-7.7 SP+ points

#99 · Up 3 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-6.84 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#94 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 3.37 on 337 plays; defense 10.21 on 395 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Temple 22 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
2-5 · conf 1-2 · home 1-4 · away 1-1 · expected wins 3.0
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-2-1 ATS (-2.2 avg) · 2025: 7-5 ATS (+3.5 avg)
Head coach
K.C. Keeler · hired 2024-12-01 · 5-7 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #115 (138 pts) · 2025 #123 (102 pts) · 2026 #68 (192 pts)
Returning
37% of production · 29% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing0%0%
Receiving69%63%
Rushing23%28%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back113.000.84529.30
Defensive Line103.000.85298.53
Linebacker23.000.83381.67
Offensive Line102.900.83438.34
Quarterback63.000.84245.05
Receiver143.000.843611.81
Running Back63.000.85515.13
Special Teams73.000.83665.86

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Ajani Sheppard · QB

CFBD athlete 5078166. Rutgers (2023–2024); Temple (2026–2026); Washington State (2025–2025)

Passing WEPA0.45612643.8%
Pass 80.6% · Rush 21.9%

1st 34.9% · 2nd 45.3% · 3rd 59.3%

Standard downs 40.4% · Passing downs 52.0%

2023: 3★ · 0.8586
Keveun Mason · RB

CFBD athlete 5296364. Temple (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0667525.0%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 37.1%

1st 37.6% · 2nd 19.4% · 3rd 9.3%

Standard downs 31.0% · Passing downs 10.6%

2025: 3★ · 0.8500
Ajani Sheppard · QB

CFBD athlete 5078166. Rutgers (2023–2024); Temple (2026–2026); Washington State (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.4205643.8%
Pass 80.6% · Rush 21.9%

1st 34.9% · 2nd 45.3% · 3rd 59.3%

Standard downs 40.4% · Passing downs 52.0%

2023: 3★ · 0.8586
Carl Hardin · PK

CFBD athlete 5151240. Temple (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.25012—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: stars unavailable
Ash Roberts · WR

CFBD athlete 5159173. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 1.6%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Coen Logan · WR

CFBD athlete 5291772. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.3%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Colin Chase · WR

CFBD athlete 5089003. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.3%
Pass 18.1% · Rush 2.4%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 10.8% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 11.4%

Not linked
De'Carlos Young · RB

CFBD athlete 5296362. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 1.2% · Rush 8.5%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 6.8% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Demonte Greene · WR

CFBD athlete 5388300. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Hunter Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 4258419. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.5%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 18.0%

1st 12.0% · 2nd 14.9% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 13.2% · Passing downs 11.1%

Not linked
Jaxon Smolik · QB

CFBD athlete 5077787. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——17.6%
Pass 31.9% · Rush 9.7%

1st 12.5% · 2nd 20.5% · 3rd 26.4%

Standard downs 13.7% · Passing downs 27.4%

Not linked
Jayce Freeman · WR

CFBD athlete 5087747. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.4%
Pass 19.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 8.1%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Joey Schlaffer · TE

CFBD athlete 4898892. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jovanni Bermudez · WR

CFBD athlete 4726152. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.8%
Pass 17.6% · Rush 2.3%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 5.4%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 10.3%

Not linked
Peter Clarke · TE

CFBD athlete 5080547. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 16.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 14.1%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 8.8%

Not linked
Ramier Hardy · WR

CFBD athlete 5296370. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Ryder Kusch · TE

CFBD athlete 5222551. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 4.1%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Samuel Brown V · RB

CFBD athlete 4685695. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——23.2%
Pass 8.9% · Rush 31.6%

1st 24.5% · 2nd 22.2% · 3rd 20.8%

Standard downs 22.8% · Passing downs 24.2%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 23 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ajani Sheppard · QBWashington State2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cookie Desiderio · LBMassachusetts2026-01-163★ / 0.8200Immediate
Demonte Greene · WRMidwestern State2025-12-043★ / 0.8300Immediate
Deshon Dodson · DLNot reported2026-01-113★ / 0.8200Immediate
JaMair Diaz · LBSam Houston2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Jaeden Gould · SUCF2026-01-084★ / —Immediate
Jaxon Smolik · QBPenn State2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Jayce Freeman · WRStony Brook2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaylon Joseph · EDGELafayette2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Joey Schlaffer · TEPenn State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
John Stone · IOLRutgers2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kaleb Artis · DLPenn State2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kenedy Uzoma · WRNorth Carolina2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kevin Hornbeak · DLTiffin University2026-01-083★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kolin Dinkins · SPenn State2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Lamar Fairfax Jr. · DLMemphis2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Quante Gillians · DLSyracuse2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ransom McDermott · OTLouisville2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Reis Stocksdale · WRBowling Green2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Saboor Karriem · SIllinois2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Sam Wolfenden · LSUNLV2026-01-143★ / 0.8000Immediate
Samuel Brown V · RBRutgers2026-01-073★ / 0.8400Immediate
Zach Aamland · OTRutgers2026-01-113★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 26 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ben Osueke · CBKansas State2026-08-283★ / —Immediate
Carter Sheehan · IOLNot reported2025-11-28— / —Immediate
Conlan Greene · DLYoungstown State2026-01-112★ / —Immediate
Darius Morant · RBNot reported2025-12-24— / —Immediate
Ian Stewart · WRNot reported2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Jalen Stewart · LBNot reported2025-12-223★ / —Immediate
John Adams · WRNot reported2025-12-08— / —Immediate
Joquez Smith · RBNew Hampshire2026-01-213★ / —Immediate
Jordan Thomas · DLNot reported2025-12-13— / —Immediate
K.J. Miles · DLMemphis2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Ken Meir · IOLNew Mexico2026-01-273★ / 0.8000Immediate
Khalil Poteat · DLNot reported2025-12-023★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kian Johnson · WRNot reported2025-12-06— / —Immediate
London Hall · LBBethune-Cookman2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Lucas Possenti · IOLArkansas2026-02-013★ / 0.8000Immediate
Nic Reeves · IOLNot reported2025-12-10— / —Immediate
Omar Ibrahim · CBMonmouth2026-01-24— / —Immediate
Sekou Kromah · DLRutgers2026-08-023★ / 0.8600Immediate
Shane Toolan · OTBucknell2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Sultan Badmus · EDGEArkansas State2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Terrez Worthy · RBMaryland2026-05-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyler Douglas · QBNot reported2025-12-263★ / —Immediate
Tyler Stewart · WRIndiana State2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Tyrese Whitaker · DLTennessee Tech2026-01-172★ / —Immediate
Xavier Irvin · WRNot reported2025-10-063★ / 0.8000Immediate
Zavien Bryant · SNot reported2025-12-083★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Temple. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

K.C. Keeler · career 17–19 across 4 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 19 appointments
  1. 2025–present · K.C. Keeler · active at capture

    5–7 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Everett Withers · interim

    0–2 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2024-11-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2022–2024 · Stan Drayton

    9–25 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-12-15. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2019–2021 · Rod Carey

    12–20 · 32 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2019-01-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2018–2018 · Ed Foley

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2018-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2017–2018 · Geoff Collins

    15–10 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2016-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2013–2016 · Matt Rhule

    28–23 · 51 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2011–2012 · Steve Addazio

    13–11 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2010-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 2006–2010 · Al Golden

    27–34 · 61 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2005-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1998–2005 · Bobby Wallace

    19–71 · 90 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1993–1997 · Ron Dickerson

    8–47 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1989–1992 · Jerry Berndt

    11–33 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1983–1988 · Bruce Arians

    27–39 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1971–1982 · Wayne Hardin

    73–49–3 · 125 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1949–1952 · Al Kawal

    17–19–2 · 38 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1940–1948 · Ray Morrison

    31–38–9 · 78 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1939–1939 · Fred Swan

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1933–1938 · Pop Warner

    31–18–9 · 58 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1930–1932 · Henry Miller

    20–5–3 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · K.C. Keeler · incomplete attribution0–0——-6.9-9.868—
2025 · K.C. Keeler5–73–50–0-5.1-7123—
2024 · Everett Withers · incomplete attribution0–2——-20.3-17115—
2024 · Stan Drayton · incomplete attribution3–7——-20.3-17115—
2023 · Stan Drayton3–91–70–0-21-19.685—
2022 · Stan Drayton3–91–70–0-12.9-10.295—
2021 · Rod Carey3–91–70–0-19.1-19.7105—
2020 · Rod Carey1–61–60–0-10—97—
2019 · Rod Carey8–55–30–13.2-2.7105—
2018 · Geoff Collins · incomplete attribution8–4——2.93.783—
2018 · Ed Foley · incomplete attribution0–1——2.93.783—
2017 · Geoff Collins7–64–41–00.5-1.6119—
2016 · Matt Rhule · incomplete attribution10–3——11.97.859—
2015 · Matt Rhule10–47–20–167.480—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-23 16:46:57 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play38 / 13873.0120 / 13813.1
Success rate69 / 13850.4123 / 13810.9
Explosiveness48 / 13865.764 / 13854.0
Standard-down success66 / 13852.6103 / 13825.5
Passing-down success78 / 13843.8137 / 1380.7
Pass PPA58 / 13858.4119 / 13813.9
Rush PPA27 / 13881.0100 / 13827.7
Pass explosiveness19 / 13886.977 / 13844.5
Rush explosiveness35 / 13875.247 / 13866.4
Line yards22 / 13884.775 / 13846.0
Second-level yards15 / 13889.8105 / 13824.1
Open-field yards21 / 13885.461 / 13856.2
Stuff rate77 / 13844.5109 / 13821.2
Power success119 / 13813.9T115 / 13816.4
HavocT18 / 13887.2137 / 1380.7
Front-seven havocT35 / 13874.1136 / 1381.5
DB havocT17 / 13888.0T132 / 1383.6
Points / opportunity110 / 13820.495 / 13831.4
Average field position132 / 1384.4T45 / 13867.2
Field-position expected points135 / 1382.2T41 / 13870.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Ajani Sheppard · QBUsage 43.8% · Avg PPA 0.384 · Total 70.618
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.38470.61843.8%
Pass0.32842.30480.6%
Rush0.51528.31421.9%
1st down0.34422.36834.9%
2nd down0.41325.99745.3%
3rd down0.59530.32059.3%
Standard downs0.28934.72940.4%
Passing downs0.56135.88952.0%
Keveun Mason · RBUsage 25.0% · Avg PPA 0.092 · Total 9.674
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0929.67425.0%
Pass0.0770.9267.5%
Rush0.0948.74837.1%
1st down0.1097.61537.6%
2nd down-0.040-1.08919.4%
3rd down0.3933.1479.3%
Standard downs0.0080.73631.0%
Passing downs0.6888.93810.6%
Samuel Brown V · RBUsage 23.2% · Avg PPA 0.743 · Total 21.553
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.74321.55323.2%
Pass3.17912.7158.9%
Rush0.3548.83831.6%
1st down0.0290.37824.5%
2nd down1.50615.06222.2%
3rd down2.00010.00220.8%
Standard downs0.3276.86922.8%
Passing downs1.83614.68524.2%
Jaxon Smolik · QBUsage 17.6% · Avg PPA -0.054 · Total -2.433
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.054-2.43317.6%
Pass-0.191-5.72831.9%
Rush0.2203.2959.7%
1st down0.0490.68312.5%
2nd down-0.134-2.27620.5%
3rd down-0.060-0.84026.4%
Standard downs-0.018-0.45313.7%
Passing downs-0.099-1.98027.4%
Hunter Smith · RBUsage 12.5% · Avg PPA -0.255 · Total -9.440
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.255-9.44012.5%
Pass-0.982-5.8915.2%
Rush-0.114-3.54918.0%
1st down-0.336-5.38012.0%
2nd down-0.229-3.20014.9%
3rd down0.5603.3639.7%
Standard downs-0.308-8.31913.2%
Passing downs-0.112-1.12111.1%
Colin Chase · WRUsage 8.3% · Avg PPA 0.805 · Total 28.165
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.80528.1658.3%
Pass0.75621.93818.1%
Rush1.0386.2282.4%
1st down0.7398.1295.9%
2nd down1.24818.72210.8%
3rd down0.1461.31410.5%
Standard downs0.87018.2747.1%
Passing downs0.7069.89111.4%
Jovanni Bermudez · WRUsage 7.8% · Avg PPA 0.318 · Total 8.897
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3188.8977.8%
Pass0.3036.97117.6%
Rush0.3851.9262.3%
1st down0.5317.4308.9%
2nd down0.3143.1368.3%
3rd down-0.417-1.6695.4%
Standard downs0.3616.1366.7%
Passing downs0.2512.76110.3%
Jayce Freeman · WRUsage 7.4% · Avg PPA 0.205 · Total 6.340
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2056.3407.4%
Pass0.2056.34019.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1672.3407.5%
2nd down0.1551.3966.5%
3rd down0.9676.7688.1%
Standard downs-0.096-2.2047.7%
Passing downs1.0688.5446.5%
Peter Clarke · TEUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.881 · Total 20.262
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.88120.2626.6%
Pass0.88120.26216.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.5219.1283.8%
2nd down0.0800.5596.3%
3rd down1.05710.57514.1%
Standard downs0.94613.2485.7%
Passing downs0.7797.0148.8%
De'Carlos Young · RBUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.003 · Total 0.035
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0030.0355.6%
Pass-0.399-0.3991.2%
Rush0.0360.4348.5%
1st down-0.624-1.8722.9%
2nd down0.0840.4186.8%
3rd down-0.550-1.1004.0%
Standard downs0.0810.7305.7%
Passing downs-0.174-0.6955.4%
Ryder Kusch · TEUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA -0.126 · Total -1.512
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.126-1.5123.3%
Pass-0.126-1.5128.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.193-1.3484.2%
2nd down0.3140.6281.7%
3rd down-0.264-0.7924.1%
Standard downs-0.193-1.3482.6%
Passing downs-0.033-0.1645.0%
Ash Roberts · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA -0.256 · Total -0.768
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.256-0.7682.4%
Pass-0.324-0.6483.4%
Rush-0.120-0.1201.6%
1st down-0.926-0.9261.7%
2nd down-0.120-0.1202.6%
3rd down0.2780.2784.2%
Standard downs-0.523-1.0462.2%
Passing downs0.2780.2783.1%
Coen Logan · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.525 · Total 0.525
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5250.5251.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5250.5252.3%
1st down0.5250.5253.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5250.5252.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Demonte Greene · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.455 · Total 0.455
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4550.4551.6%
Pass0.4550.4555.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.4550.4557.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.4550.4555.0%
Joey Schlaffer · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.615 · Total 1.846
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6151.8461.6%
Pass0.6151.8464.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.503-1.0052.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.6151.8462.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ramier Hardy · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.646 · Total -0.646
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.646-0.6461.4%
Pass-0.646-0.6464.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.646-0.6463.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.646-0.6461.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Temple sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.206 (73rd percentile; 138 teams)73rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.431 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.266 (66th percentile; 138 teams)66thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.246 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.184 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.202 (13th percentile; 138 teams)13thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.462 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.208 (54th percentile; 138 teams)54thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.098 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1st
Values and percentiles
Temple metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.20673rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.43150th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.26666th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.24658th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.18481st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.20213th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.46211th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.20854th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.0981st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 148 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.7 yards (54th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 7.1 per completion. Completion 61.5%, 8.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.37.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.8%60.4%+1.4131 / 148
Defense allowed68.6%60.3%+8.3169 / 202

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Temple.

Target mix by zone, Temple offense
Short left38% · 55Short middle13% · 19Short right34% · 49Deep left7% · 10Deep middle4% · 6Deep right5% · 7

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Temple passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense14899%8.77.161.5%0.37+1.4 pp131
Passing defense202100%9.15.866.8%0.36+8.3 pp169

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2635.446.7%0.233.501.301.7015.2%63.9%
Defense allowed2614.244.7%0.182.901.000.9014.6%79.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense260 / 263256715440244 / 244 · 100.0%
Defense allowed254 / 261242199660245 / 246 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.4 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-5.94.414.7W1W2W2 vs Penn State: -5.9 ppW3W3 vs Toledo: -1.6 ppW4W4 vs Army: -5.2 ppW5W5 vs South Florida: +4.9 ppW6W6 vs UConn: +14.7 ppW7W7 vs Charlotte: +0.2 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Rhode Island160———6.80.38455.10.23
W2Penn State222259.1%65.0%-5.9 pp6.4-0.34335.30.43
W3Toledo232352.2%53.7%-1.6 pp11.20.62495.30.25
W4Army202055.0%60.2%-5.2 pp9.80.55326.80.31
W5South Florida141361.5%56.6%+4.9 pp12.80.35365.10.00
W6UConn262676.9%62.3%+14.7 pp8.50.69344.50.00
W7Charlotte272763.0%62.7%+0.2 pp7.00.29346.10.39

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

23 punts · 42.5 gross yards/punt · 38.8 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 0 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 23/23 punts. Known net yards: 17/23 punts.

Our punt returns

9 returns · 10.9 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 9/9 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Charlotte440.337.02/4
Week 6 · UConn337.037.03/3
Week 5 · South Florida540.037.54/5
Week 4 · Army242.536.01/2
Week 3 · Toledo248.041.01/2
Team style
Rating history