Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Stanford

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Stanford's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 111.5 across 8 systems; best 104, worst 130, so they disagree by 26 places.

Lab EPA
#130
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#111
up 42026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#112
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#127
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#106
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#111
down 5 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#104
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#130
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#55 of 138
Schedule strength
#11 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#43 of 138
Game control
#82 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#113 of 138
Offense
#95 of 138
Defense
#119 of 138
Special teams
#87 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Stanford · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.176 net EPA/play

#130

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-7.74 points

#111 · Up 4 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -10.74 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +1.56, schedule #31 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +5.81. That is worth -9.18 on its own; the preseason prior of -2.73 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -7.74.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Stanford · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Hawai'i
home · 2026-08-29 · ID 401858201
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.76378.50%-7.390.637-0.6280.009
Week 1 · Miami
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858206
-39.00 → -35.00-2.500.76378.50%+19.25-3.1861.636-1.550
Week 3 · Duke
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858231
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.82499.18%+4.78-2.3400.438-1.902
Week 4 · Georgia Tech
home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401858240
+7.00 → +7.00-2.500.85729.54%-5.430.429-0.518-0.089
Week 5 · Wake Forest
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858251
-54.00 → -35.00+2.500.89099.91%+12.07-3.2211.196-2.025
Week 6 · Notre Dame
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858257
-51.00 → -35.00+2.500.925910.30%+19.89-3.3482.049-1.298
Week 7 · Elon
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858262
+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.962210.71%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.623-2.676-0.054
Week 8 · NC State
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858272
+3.00 → +3.00-2.501.000011.13%-2.520.056-0.281-0.225

Game terms -7.13 points; prior term -0.61 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -7.74 points. The preseason prior is -2.73 with 22.25% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-10.8 SP+ points

#112 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-10.68 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#111 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -0.56 on 353 plays; defense 10.13 on 396 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Stanford 19 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 2-3 · home 4-1 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.2
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-5 ATS (-8.1 avg) · 2025: 5-7 ATS (+4.2 avg)
Head coach
Tavita Pritchard · hired 2025-11-28 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #30 (217 pts) · 2025 #56 (197 pts) · 2026 #37 (219 pts)
Returning
21% of production · 30% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-1%1%
Receiving31%32%
Rushing135%63%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back163.130.862513.80
Defensive Line163.130.873013.97
Linebacker93.000.85607.70
Offensive Line153.070.871313.07
Quarterback43.500.89343.57
Receiver163.130.872813.97
Running Back53.000.87464.37
Special Teams103.100.86098.61

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Davis Warren · QB

CFBD athlete 4878681. Stanford (2026–2026); Michigan (2022–2025)

Passing WEPA0.27724855.0%
Pass 95.5% · Rush 5.8%

1st 44.4% · 2nd 60.0% · 3rd 68.5%

Standard downs 46.6% · Passing downs 71.8%

Not linked
Micah Ford · RB

CFBD athlete 5143191. Stanford (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.11112131.2%
Pass 10.3% · Rush 59.7%

1st 39.7% · 2nd 27.1% · 3rd 21.3%

Standard downs 36.1% · Passing downs 21.5%

2024: 3★ · 0.8719
Sedrick Irvin · RB

CFBD athlete 4870802. Stanford (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1253710.2%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 19.0%

1st 11.1% · 2nd 8.8% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 11.6% · Passing downs 7.3%

2023: 3★ · 0.8850
Emmet Kenney · PK

CFBD athlete 4875315. Stanford (2021–2026)

Kicker PAAR-4.1008—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Aiden Black · TE

CFBD athlete 5219250. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 8.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked
Atticus Joseph · WR

CFBD athlete 5294219. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 6.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Benjamin Blackburn · TE

CFBD athlete 5146764. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.3%
Pass 15.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 10.2%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 10.7%

Not linked
Caden High · WR

CFBD athlete 5231354. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.7%
Pass 18.8% · Rush 0.5%

1st 7.0% · 2nd 15.4% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 10.7% · Passing downs 10.8%

Not linked
Caleb Hampton · RB

CFBD athlete 5156056. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 9.7%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 1.5%

Not linked
Charlie Mirer · QB

CFBD athlete 4914482. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.8%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Chico Holt · TE

CFBD athlete 5077804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 1.0% · 3rd 1.6%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Chris Davis Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5079371. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.8%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 1.1%

Not linked
David Pantelis · WR

CFBD athlete 4883119. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jacob Butler · WR

CFBD athlete 5279420. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.1%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Jonanthony Hall · WR

CFBD athlete 5208218. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 7.4%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 7.3%

Not linked
Jordan Onovughe · WR

CFBD athlete 5114313. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 7.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Langdon Horace · WR

CFBD athlete 5209298. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Liam Thorpe · WR

CFBD athlete 5212732. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 9.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Marcus Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5219242. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Mike Mitchell Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5211073. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 1.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 5.4%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Nico Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5094032. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.0%
Pass 16.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.6% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 7.8% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Tuna Altahir · RB

CFBD athlete 4876144. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.7%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Tyler Kuo · WR

CFBD athlete 5125795. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Zion Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5217152. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.9% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 6 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aidan Kilstrom · IOLHarvard2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carter Shaw · WRUCLA2026-01-273★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dara Adeyemi · OTBucknell2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Davis Warren · QBMichigan2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Leroy Bryant · CBWashington2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nico Brown · WRYale2026-01-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 12 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
CJ Hawkins · TERhode Island2026-01-213★ / —Immediate
Charlie Mirer · QBNot reported2026-02-093★ / —Withdrawn
Che Ojarikre · SDuke2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cole Tabb · RBCincinnati2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Elijah Brown · QBWashington2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Emeka Ugorji · OTFlorida2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jack Leyrer · OTAuburn2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jason Thompson · WRNot reported2025-12-163★ / —Immediate
Myles Jackson · QBNot reported2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Myles Libman · WRNew Mexico State2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Wilfredo Aybar · EDGENot reported2026-01-204★ / —Withdrawn
Zak Yamauchi · IOLBYU2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Stanford. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Tavita Pritchard · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 28 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Tavita Pritchard · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-11-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Frank Reich · interim

    4–8 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-03-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2023–2024 · Troy Taylor

    6–18 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2011–2022 · David Shaw

    96–54 · 150 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Hired 2011-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2007–2010 · Jim Harbaugh

    29–21 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2005–2006 · Walt Harris

    6–17 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2002–2004 · Buddy Teevens

    10–23 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2002-01-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1995–2001 · Tyrone Willingham

    44–36–1 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1992–1994 · Bill Walsh

    17–17–1 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1989–1991 · Dennis Green

    16–18 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1984–1988 · Jack Elway

    25–29–2 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1980–1983 · Paul Wiggin

    16–28 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1979–1979 · Ron Dowhower

    5–5–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1977–1978 · Bill Walsh

    17–7 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1972–1976 · Jack Christiansen

    30–22–3 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1963–1971 · John Ralston

    55–36–3 · 94 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1958–1962 · Jack Curtice

    14–36 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1951–1957 · Chuck Taylor

    40–29–2 · 71 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1946–1950 · Marchy Schwartz

    22–24–4 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1942–1942 · Marchy Schwartz

    6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1940–1941 · Clark Shaughnessy

    16–3 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1933–1939 · Tiny Thornhill

    35–25–7 · 67 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1924–1932 · Pop Warner

    71–17–8 · 96 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1922–1923 · Andrew Kerr

    11–7 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1921–1921 · Conrad Van Gent

    4–2–2 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1920–1920 · Walter Powell

    4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1919–1919 · Bob Evans

    4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1918–1918 · A.H. Badenoch

    0–4 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Tavita Pritchard · incomplete attribution0–0——-11.2-8.837—
2025 · Frank Reich4–83–50–0-11.8-4.156—
2024 · Troy Taylor3–92–60–0-8.2-5.730—
2023 · Troy Taylor3–92–70–0-11.9-5.546—
2022 · David Shaw3–91–80–0-7.2-5.119—
2021 · David Shaw3–92–70–0-10.2-2.751—
2020 · David Shaw4–24–20–01.6—21—
2019 · David Shaw4–83–60–0-4.7-1.921—
2018 · David Shaw9–46–31–0138.340—
2017 · David Shaw9–57–30–115.812.51420
2016 · David Shaw10–36–31–016.412.71612
2015 · David Shaw12–29–11–022.820.6243
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:24:33 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play75 / 13846.0138 / 1380.0
Success rate112 / 13819.0131 / 1385.1
Explosiveness66 / 13852.6120 / 13813.1
Standard-down success76 / 13845.3124 / 13810.2
Passing-down success129 / 1386.6136 / 1381.5
Pass PPA83 / 13840.1132 / 1384.4
Rush PPA98 / 13829.2136 / 1381.5
Pass explosiveness80 / 13842.363 / 13854.7
Rush explosiveness95 / 13831.4132 / 1384.4
Line yards97 / 13829.9129 / 1386.6
Second-level yards129 / 1386.6129 / 1386.6
Open-field yards106 / 13823.4121 / 13812.4
Stuff rate98 / 13829.2119 / 13813.9
Power successT5 / 13896.7122 / 13811.7
HavocT30 / 13878.1134 / 1382.9
Front-seven havocT21 / 13884.7T132 / 1383.6
DB havocT71 / 13848.2T122 / 13810.6
Points / opportunity79 / 13843.1138 / 1380.0
Average field positionT137 / 1380.4T108 / 13821.2
Field-position expected points136 / 1381.5T104 / 13824.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Davis Warren · QBUsage 55.0% · Avg PPA 0.224 · Total 65.185
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.22465.18555.0%
Pass0.23565.14895.5%
Rush-0.098-1.2695.8%
1st down0.16417.06144.4%
2nd down0.32733.32460.0%
3rd down0.26019.23968.5%
Standard downs0.18830.82846.6%
Passing downs0.27134.35771.8%
Micah Ford · RBUsage 31.2% · Avg PPA 0.160 · Total 26.320
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.16026.32031.2%
Pass0.2026.07410.3%
Rush0.15020.24659.7%
1st down0.0656.02639.7%
2nd down0.1205.51627.1%
3rd down0.60813.97621.3%
Standard downs0.19324.57136.1%
Passing downs0.0461.74921.5%
Caden High · WRUsage 10.7% · Avg PPA 0.470 · Total 23.034
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47023.03410.7%
Pass0.51524.74018.8%
Rush-1.706-1.7060.5%
1st down0.72710.1827.0%
2nd down0.1784.09215.4%
3rd down1.02311.25611.8%
Standard downs0.44314.17510.7%
Passing downs0.5218.85910.8%
Sedrick Irvin · RBUsage 10.2% · Avg PPA 0.178 · Total 9.587
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1789.58710.2%
Pass0.5976.5663.8%
Rush0.0703.02119.0%
1st down0.0220.57611.1%
2nd down0.0671.0078.8%
3rd down0.4785.73911.1%
Standard downs0.2088.53211.6%
Passing downs0.0811.0557.3%
Nico Brown · WRUsage 9.0% · Avg PPA 0.528 · Total 18.488
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.52818.4889.0%
Pass0.52818.48816.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2683.4857.6%
2nd down0.5794.6306.3%
3rd down0.2632.36511.5%
Standard downs0.56511.3087.8%
Passing downs0.4797.18011.3%
Benjamin Blackburn · TEUsage 8.3% · Avg PPA 0.062 · Total 2.735
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0622.7358.3%
Pass0.0622.73515.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0520.9437.7%
2nd down0.3995.5928.2%
3rd down0.0320.35410.2%
Standard downs-0.132-3.3057.1%
Passing downs0.3186.03910.7%
Jonanthony Hall · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.634 · Total 16.490
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.63416.4904.9%
Pass0.60715.1838.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0980.9804.3%
2nd down0.8586.8674.7%
3rd down1.0808.6427.4%
Standard downs0.2092.7163.7%
Passing downs1.05913.7737.3%
Liam Thorpe · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.387 · Total 2.709
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3872.7094.9%
Pass0.3872.7099.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8581.7163.2%
2nd down0.3051.2229.1%
3rd down-0.228-0.2283.1%
Standard downs0.2820.8473.2%
Passing downs0.4651.8618.2%
Caleb Hampton · RBUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA -0.129 · Total -2.328
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.129-2.3284.7%
Pass-0.438-1.3141.4%
Rush-0.068-1.0149.7%
1st down-0.138-1.3835.9%
2nd down-0.118-0.9456.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.146-2.3356.4%
Passing downs0.0040.0081.5%
Zion Robinson · WRUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA -0.080 · Total -1.518
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.080-1.5184.6%
Pass-0.080-1.5188.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1221.0974.9%
2nd down0.2321.3924.5%
3rd down-0.053-0.1583.6%
Standard downs-0.073-0.8704.4%
Passing downs-0.093-0.6485.0%
Charlie Mirer · QBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA -0.763 · Total -1.526
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.763-1.5264.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.6050.6054.8%
1st down0.6050.6055.0%
2nd down-2.131-2.1317.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.6050.6053.3%
Passing downs-2.131-2.1317.1%
Mike Mitchell Jr. · QBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA -0.481 · Total -5.770
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.481-5.7704.5%
Pass-0.512-5.6346.9%
Rush-0.137-0.1371.0%
1st down-0.176-0.7043.4%
2nd down0.6051.8143.4%
3rd down0.4421.3255.4%
Standard downs-0.130-0.6522.9%
Passing downs-0.731-5.1187.1%
Jordan Onovughe · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.544 · Total 10.888
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.54410.8884.4%
Pass0.54410.8887.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7945.5603.5%
2nd down0.2401.4384.1%
3rd down0.0230.1416.3%
Standard downs0.6826.8223.3%
Passing downs0.4074.0666.5%
Atticus Joseph · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.645 · Total 9.036
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6459.0363.6%
Pass0.6459.0366.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1800.8983.0%
2nd down0.7263.6324.1%
3rd down1.1264.5064.8%
Standard downs0.8887.9893.6%
Passing downs0.2091.0473.7%
Chris Davis Jr. · RBUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.109 · Total -0.869
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.109-0.8693.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.109-0.8697.8%
1st down-0.193-0.7713.6%
2nd down-0.473-1.4183.7%
3rd down1.3201.3201.8%
Standard downs-0.129-0.9034.3%
Passing downs0.0340.0341.1%
Tuna Altahir · RBUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.052 · Total -0.103
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.052-0.1032.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.052-0.1036.7%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.052-0.1038.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0110.0112.5%
Passing downs-0.115-0.1153.3%
Aiden Black · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA -0.762 · Total -2.287
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.762-2.2872.6%
Pass-0.762-2.2875.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.762-2.2878.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.819-1.6382.4%
Passing downs-0.649-0.6493.0%
Chico Holt · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA -0.161 · Total -1.287
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.161-1.2872.6%
Pass-0.161-1.2874.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.576-2.8783.5%
2nd down1.5441.5441.0%
3rd down1.6901.6901.6%
Standard downs-0.222-1.3342.9%
Passing downs0.0240.0471.9%
David Pantelis · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -1.169 · Total -1.169
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.169-1.1691.7%
Pass-1.169-1.1692.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.169-1.1695.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.169-1.1692.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Marcus Brown · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.514 · Total 0.514
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5140.5141.5%
Pass0.5140.5142.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.5140.5144.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5140.5142.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jacob Butler · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -1.233 · Total -2.467
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.233-2.4671.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-1.233-2.4673.1%
1st down-1.836-1.8361.6%
2nd down-0.631-0.6312.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.836-1.8361.0%
Passing downs-0.631-0.6312.3%
Langdon Horace · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.579 · Total 1.157
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5791.1571.4%
Pass0.5791.1572.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3811.3811.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.224-0.2243.3%
Standard downs1.3811.3811.1%
Passing downs-0.224-0.2242.3%
Tyler Kuo · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.462 · Total -0.462
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.462-0.4621.4%
Pass-0.462-0.4622.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.462-0.4623.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.462-0.4622.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Stanford sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.126 (46th percentile; 138 teams)46thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.395 (19th percentile; 138 teams)19thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.242 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.194 (40th percentile; 138 teams)40thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.045 (29th percentile; 138 teams)29thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.322 (0th percentile; 138 teams)0thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.479 (5th percentile; 138 teams)5thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.339 (13th percentile; 138 teams)13thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.111 (3rd percentile; 138 teams)3rd
Values and percentiles
Stanford metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.12646th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.39519th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.24253rd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.19440th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.04529th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.3220th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.4795th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.33913th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.1113rd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 282 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.9 yards (62nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.6 per completion. Completion 60.3%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.27.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense58.2%60.7%-2.6239 / 282
Defense allowed66.4%61.3%+5.1232 / 265

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Stanford.

Target mix by zone, Stanford offense
Short left31% · 85Short middle21% · 59Short right36% · 101Deep left4% · 10Deep middle3% · 7Deep right5% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Stanford passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense28299%8.94.660.3%0.27-2.6 pp239
Passing defense26598%8.45.963.0%0.42+5.1 pp232

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2403.941.4%0.103.100.800.9016.7%86.4%
Defense allowed2835.452.0%0.343.301.201.6013.7%81.1%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense238 / 240232812560221 / 222 · 99.5%
Defense allowed275 / 283269146660268 / 271 · 98.9%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.6 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-12.3-3.45.5W1W1 vs Hawai'i: +4.6 ppW1W1 vs Miami: -6.1 ppW3W3 vs Duke: -10.2 ppW4W4 vs Georgia Tech: +5.5 ppW5W5 vs Wake Forest: -4.5 ppW6W6 vs Notre Dame: -12.3 ppW7W8W8 vs NC State: +2.6 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Hawai'i343363.6%59.1%+4.6 pp9.40.38374.70.22
W1Miami424252.4%58.5%-6.1 pp11.10.09233.4-0.08
W3Duke363655.6%65.8%-10.2 pp6.9-0.10223.30.01
W4Georgia Tech363560.0%54.5%+5.5 pp11.70.85362.8-0.14
W5Wake Forest333363.6%68.2%-4.5 pp4.90.03341.4-0.11
W6Notre Dame232352.2%64.5%-12.3 pp7.6-0.08212.8-0.16
W7Elon410———7.90.34346.90.59
W8NC State373759.5%56.8%+2.6 pp10.40.52335.30.32

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

43 punts · 42.6 gross yards/punt · 40.1 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 43/43 punts. Known net yards: 34/43 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 10.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · NC State342.346.02/3
Week 7 · Elon438.341.03/4
Week 6 · Notre Dame847.537.85/8
Week 5 · Wake Forest641.841.86/6
Week 4 · Georgia Tech246.542.01/2
Team style
Rating history