Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Southern Miss

2026 season

Sun Belt
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Southern Miss's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 126.5 across 8 systems; best 117, worst 129, so they disagree by 12 places.

Lab EPA
#129
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#127
up 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#126
up 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#122
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#118
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#117
up 6 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#129
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#129
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#123 of 138
Schedule strength
#101 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#95 of 138
Game control
#133 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#123 of 138
Offense
#114 of 138
Defense
#100 of 138
Special teams
#124 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Southern Miss · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.171 net EPA/play

#129

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-11.42 points

#127 · Up 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -8.85 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -5.09, schedule #96 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -2.25. That is worth -13.94 on its own; the preseason prior of -3.70 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -11.42.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Southern Miss · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Alcorn State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401868356
+46.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.40%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.054-2.3490.705
Week 2 · Auburn
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856671
-35.00 → -35.00+2.500.79379.77%+5.67-3.1740.554-2.620
Week 3 · UConn
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401861963
-28.00 → -28.00-2.500.824910.15%+0.47-3.0950.048-3.048
Week 4 · Tulane
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401862784
-3.00 → -3.00+2.500.857210.55%-2.97-0.053-0.313-0.366
Week 6 · Troy
away · 2026-10-07 · ID 401871090
-21.00 → -21.00+2.500.925911.39%-9.91-2.107-1.129-3.237
Week 7 · Arkansas State
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401869934
-10.00 → -10.00-2.500.962211.84%-4.89-1.480-0.579-2.059
Week 8 · Louisiana
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401869967
+4.00 → +4.00-2.501.000012.30%-0.550.185-0.0680.117

Game terms -10.51 points; prior term -0.91 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -11.42 points. The preseason prior is -3.70 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-16.0 SP+ points

#126 · Up 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-12.44 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#117 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -6.11 on 360 plays; defense 6.33 on 437 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Southern Miss 2 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
2-5 · conf 1-2 · home 2-2 · away 0-3 · expected wins 2.1
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4 ATS (+2.2 avg) · 2025: 6-7 ATS (-1.7 avg)
Head coach
Blake Anderson · hired 2025-12-11 · 0-1 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #77 (168 pts) · 2025 #105 (141 pts) · 2026 #108 (175 pts)
Returning
90% of production · 92% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing97%100%
Receiving82%85%
Rushing102%91%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back83.000.84556.76
Defensive Line103.000.84568.46
Linebacker52.800.84054.20
Offensive Line63.000.83625.02
Quarterback62.830.84025.04
Receiver123.000.840610.09
Running Back13.000.84330.84
Special Teams72.860.81885.73

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Landy Lyddy · QB

CFBD athlete 4833635. UAB (2023–2024); Louisiana Tech (2022–2022); Southern Miss (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.14818340.2%
Pass 69.0% · Rush 8.4%

1st 32.4% · 2nd 41.8% · 3rd 54.8%

Standard downs 34.0% · Passing downs 56.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8356
Steven Robinson · RB

CFBD athlete 5394596. Southern Miss (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.11510428.2%
Pass 7.0% · Rush 54.2%

1st 35.1% · 2nd 24.1% · 3rd 18.3%

Standard downs 33.4% · Passing downs 14.9%

Not linked
Ethan Hampton · QB

CFBD athlete 4618083. Illinois (2025–2025); Northern Illinois (2021–2024); Southern Miss (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.1365336.5%
Pass 66.4% · Rush 4.8%

1st 28.3% · 2nd 41.6% · 3rd 50.0%

Standard downs 31.5% · Passing downs 50.9%

2021: 3★ · 0.8315
Jamarice Wilder · RB

CFBD athlete 5156440. Louisville (2025–2025); Southern Miss (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2284413.5%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 24.9%

1st 15.6% · 2nd 12.0% · 3rd 10.8%

Standard downs 14.6% · Passing downs 10.6%

2025: 3★ · 0.8647
Creighton Wilbanks · PK

CFBD athlete 5254183. Southern Miss (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-9.7707—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: 3★ · 0.8156
A.J. Little · WR

CFBD athlete 5153318. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 11.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Broderick Peters · TE

CFBD athlete 5274304. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Davis Dalton · WR

CFBD athlete 4869802. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.5%
Pass 11.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 7.5% · 3rd 13.2%

Standard downs 5.0% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
Eelijah Singleton · WR

CFBD athlete 5394591. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 5.1%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Grant Page · WR

CFBD athlete 4702560. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Jaylen Foster · RB

CFBD athlete 5125171. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 10.5%

1st 7.3% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 7.0% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Jaylen Himes · WR

CFBD athlete 5394595. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 8.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.1% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Jeremiah Beck Jr. · TE

CFBD athlete 5293671. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 1.5%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
John White · QB

CFBD athlete 5079628. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 3.5%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Kaden Saunders · WR

CFBD athlete 4685510. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 12.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 7.5% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
MJ Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 5151526. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 1.1%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 5.2%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Mario Sanders II · WR

CFBD athlete 5218891. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.7%
Pass 24.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 13.3% · 2nd 12.7% · 3rd 10.8%

Standard downs 12.6% · Passing downs 12.8%

Not linked
Preston Kilgore · TE

CFBD athlete 5161233. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 7.5%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Robert Briggs · RB

CFBD athlete 4869552. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 1.5% · Rush 4.9%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Robert Henderson · RB

CFBD athlete 5296029. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 10.5%

1st 7.3% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 38 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
A'mari Wilson · EDGECampbell2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
A.J. Little · WRChattanooga2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Amari Wilson · EDGEGeorgia Southern2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Andrew Martin · LBStetson2026-01-283★ / 0.8400Immediate
Baron Taylor · SSouthern Utah2026-01-293★ / 0.8200Immediate
Braden Cain · OTTexas Southern2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brandon Hood · RBMassachusetts2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Caleb Williams · SNot reported2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Champ Lewis · CBTulsa2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Christian Young · IOLEmory & Henry2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Da'Jy'Quwan Jackson-Payne · OTLiberty2026-01-133★ / 0.8200Immediate
Dusty Zimmer · PWashington2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Ethan Hampton · QBIllinois2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Hiroshi Carr · CBMorgan State2026-01-193★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jackson Banks · DLWestern Carolina2026-02-043★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jamarice Wilder · RBLouisville2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaylen Himes · WRWingate2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jeffery Rush · EDGEOle Miss2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jeremiah Beck · TEArkansas2026-01-193★ / 0.8300Immediate
Joe Rounds · IOLVirginia Union2026-01-143★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jonah Martinez · CBTCU2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jordan Pride · STexas A&M2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josh Johnson · DLNicholls2026-01-063★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jyaire Brown · CBUCF2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kaden Saunders · WRPenn State2026-01-074★ / —Immediate
Kei'shaun Mashburn · DLNot reported2026-04-173★ / —Immediate
Kelby Hampton · CBNew Hampshire2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kobi Albert · SUConn2026-02-013★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kolby Peavy · SAlabama2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Landon Sylvie · SSoutheast Missouri State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Laquan Robinson · SKansas2026-01-083★ / 0.8400Immediate
Mario Sanders II · WRIllinois2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Melvin Spriggs · LBAkron2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Michael Robinson III · CBUConn2026-02-043★ / 0.8000Immediate
Preston Kilgore · TEEast Texas A&M2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
Toby Mealer · IOLLouisiana Tech2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Will Smith · EDGENorth Texas2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Xavier McIver · DLEast Carolina2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 28 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ahmere Foster · SMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Amir Leonard-Jean Charles · DLMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Anthony Richard Jr. · CBMemphis2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Carlos Slayden · IOLAkron2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Chris Jones · LBFlorida State2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Chris Stokes · DLMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Corey Myrick · SClemson2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Denzel Gardner · QBMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Dylan King · SMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Elijah Kinsler · DLMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Garrick Ponder · EDGEBaylor2026-01-103★ / 0.8800Immediate
Guylijah Theodule · CBUAB2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hayes Creel · OTEast Carolina2026-01-10— / —Immediate
IIiyas Fuavai · EDGENot reported2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Ian Foster · SMemphis2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
J'Mond Tapp · EDGEMemphis2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
JJ Hawkins · EDGENot reported2025-12-273★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jabari Ishmael · EDGEMemphis2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jacobe Robinson · QBNot reported2025-12-253★ / —Immediate
Jaden McKinney · DLMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jaylin Carter · WRMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jermane Hayes · WRMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jonathan Pennix · CBTroy2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Mason Clinton · DLFlorida2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Montgomery · LBMemphis2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Shane King · TEArizona2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tychaun Chapman · WRMemphis2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Zach Ruffin · SMemphis2026-01-054★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Southern Miss. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Blake Anderson · career 74–55 across 13 seasons and 3 schools

Tenure timeline · 16 appointments
  1. 2025–2025 · Charles Huff

    7–5 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-08. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-23.

  2. 2025–present · Blake Anderson · active at capture

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-11. Effective dates: 2025-12-23 to unknown.

  3. 2024–2024 · Reed Stringer · interim

    0–5 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2024-10-20. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2021–2024 · Will Hall

    14–30 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2020-12-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2020–2020 · Scotty Walden

    1–3 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2020-09-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2020–2020 · Tim Billings

    2–3 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2020-10-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2016–2020 · Jay Hopson

    28–23 · 51 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2016-01-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2013–2015 · Todd Monken

    13–25 · 38 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 2012–2012 · Ellis Johnson

    0–12 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2011-10-20. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 2008–2011 · Larry Fedora

    34–19 · 53 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2007-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1990–2007 · Jeff Bower

    118–84–1 · 203 attributed games · 18 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1988–1989 · Curley Hallman

    15–8 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1982–1987 · Jim Carmody

    37–29 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1975–1981 · Bobby Collins

    46–32–2 · 80 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1969–1974 · P.W. Underwood

    31–32–2 · 65 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1963–1968 · Pie Vann

    34–21–1 · 56 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Blake Anderson · incomplete attribution0–0——-17.1-16.1108—
2025 · Blake Anderson0–10–00–1-7.1-8.6105—
2025 · Charles Huff7–55–30–0-7.1-8.6105—
2024 · Will Hall · incomplete attribution1–6——-25.6-23.977—
2024 · Reed Stringer · incomplete attribution0–5——-25.6-23.977—
2023 · Will Hall3–92–60–0-14.4-13.181—
2022 · Will Hall7–64–41–0-3.5-5.279—
2021 · Will Hall3–92–60–0-14.2-19.1124—
2020 · Jay Hopson · incomplete attribution0–1——-7.9-1576—
2020 · Scotty Walden · incomplete attribution1–3——-7.9-1576—
2020 · Tim Billings · incomplete attribution2–3——-7.9-1576—
2019 · Jay Hopson7–65–30–1-4.8-4.982—
2018 · Jay Hopson6–55–30–0-5-6.880—
2017 · Jay Hopson8–56–20–1-3.4-9.774—
2016 · Jay Hopson7–64–41–00.7-8.8100—
2015 · Todd Monken9–57–20–11.41.887—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:23 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play119 / 13813.9104 / 13824.8
Success rate82 / 13840.999 / 13828.5
Explosiveness91 / 13834.347 / 13866.4
Standard-down success61 / 13856.284 / 13839.4
Passing-down success126 / 1388.8T105 / 13823.7
Pass PPA126 / 1388.888 / 13836.5
Rush PPA53 / 13862.0121 / 13812.4
Pass explosiveness71 / 13848.959 / 13857.7
Rush explosiveness93 / 13832.893 / 13832.8
Line yards10 / 13893.4111 / 13819.7
Second-level yards74 / 13846.794 / 13832.1
Open-field yards95 / 13831.4118 / 13814.6
Stuff rate4 / 13897.891 / 13834.3
Power successT23 / 13883.6T115 / 13816.4
HavocT68 / 13850.0114 / 13817.5
Front-seven havoc20 / 13886.1T92 / 13832.8
DB havoc124 / 13810.2T118 / 13813.5
Points / opportunity102 / 13826.3T69 / 13850.0
Average field positionT107 / 13821.5T78 / 13842.7
Field-position expected points113 / 13818.2T87 / 13836.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Landy Lyddy · QBUsage 40.2% · Avg PPA -0.058 · Total -11.603
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.058-11.60340.2%
Pass0.0183.22069.0%
Rush-0.156-2.9588.4%
1st down-0.013-0.93032.4%
2nd down0.16911.16741.8%
3rd down0.0763.88454.8%
Standard downs0.0242.94834.0%
Passing downs-0.184-14.55156.0%
Ethan Hampton · QBUsage 36.5% · Avg PPA -0.084 · Total -6.841
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.084-6.84136.5%
Pass-0.054-4.02366.4%
Rush-0.056-0.2784.8%
1st down-0.195-5.46428.3%
2nd down0.1254.00941.6%
3rd down-0.142-2.84650.0%
Standard downs-0.147-7.66931.5%
Passing downs0.0290.82850.9%
Steven Robinson · RBUsage 28.2% · Avg PPA 0.096 · Total 13.471
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.09613.47128.2%
Pass0.2143.8587.0%
Rush0.0799.61354.2%
1st down-0.005-0.43135.1%
2nd down0.2077.85424.1%
3rd down0.70211.93418.3%
Standard downs0.0586.89233.4%
Passing downs0.3136.57814.9%
Jamarice Wilder · RBUsage 13.5% · Avg PPA 0.125 · Total 8.388
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1258.38813.5%
Pass-0.749-8.2414.3%
Rush0.29716.63024.9%
1st down0.2047.14315.6%
2nd down0.0781.48112.0%
3rd down-0.014-0.13910.8%
Standard downs0.24012.45514.6%
Passing downs-0.271-4.06710.6%
Mario Sanders II · WRUsage 12.7% · Avg PPA 0.599 · Total 37.747
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.59937.74712.7%
Pass0.59937.74724.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.58017.39513.3%
2nd down0.66513.30212.7%
3rd down1.14611.46210.8%
Standard downs0.54224.38212.6%
Passing downs0.74313.36512.8%
Jaylen Foster · RBUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.507 · Total 3.044
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5073.0447.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5073.04410.5%
1st down0.1530.4587.3%
2nd down0.6061.2136.7%
3rd down1.3731.3738.3%
Standard downs0.3221.6127.0%
Passing downs1.4321.4327.1%
Robert Henderson · RBUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.085 · Total 0.513
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0850.5137.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.0850.51310.5%
1st down-0.454-1.3637.3%
2nd down1.1672.3346.7%
3rd down-0.458-0.4588.3%
Standard downs0.1340.5375.6%
Passing downs-0.012-0.02514.3%
Kaden Saunders · WRUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.054 · Total 1.287
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0541.2876.8%
Pass0.0541.28712.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2502.4976.3%
2nd down0.5744.5957.5%
3rd down0.9313.7245.9%
Standard downs0.1331.7235.4%
Passing downs-0.040-0.4369.9%
Davis Dalton · WRUsage 6.5% · Avg PPA -0.187 · Total -4.291
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.187-4.2916.5%
Pass-0.187-4.29111.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0480.2423.1%
2nd down-0.172-1.3787.5%
3rd down0.0840.75813.2%
Standard downs0.1241.4945.0%
Passing downs-0.526-5.7859.9%
A.J. Little · WRUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.550 · Total 13.761
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.55013.7616.0%
Pass0.55013.76111.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2332.3305.3%
2nd down1.87616.8826.7%
3rd down-0.419-2.0976.5%
Standard downs0.4197.5366.1%
Passing downs0.8896.2255.9%
John White · QBUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA -0.621 · Total -2.485
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.621-2.4854.7%
Pass-0.853-1.7067.4%
Rush-0.390-0.7803.5%
1st down-0.957-0.9572.4%
2nd down-0.390-0.7806.7%
3rd down-0.749-0.7498.3%
Standard downs-1.280-3.8414.2%
Passing downs1.3551.3557.1%
Jaylen Himes · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA -0.103 · Total -0.923
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.103-0.9234.1%
Pass-0.103-0.9238.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4582.2895.1%
2nd down0.1900.3802.6%
3rd down-0.458-0.4582.5%
Standard downs0.5663.3963.6%
Passing downs-1.439-4.3185.3%
MJ Johnson · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.594 · Total 8.915
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5948.9153.6%
Pass0.6168.0106.0%
Rush0.4520.9051.1%
1st down0.4262.1312.6%
2nd down0.1440.8674.5%
3rd down1.4795.9175.2%
Standard downs0.6867.5453.7%
Passing downs0.3421.3703.4%
Jeremiah Beck Jr. · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.155 · Total 1.864
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1551.8643.4%
Pass0.1551.8646.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.438-1.7502.6%
2nd down0.0790.4755.6%
3rd down0.2500.2501.5%
Standard downs0.3233.2264.1%
Passing downs-0.681-1.3621.9%
Robert Briggs · RBUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 1.228 · Total 6.140
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2286.1403.3%
Pass-0.814-0.8141.5%
Rush1.7396.9554.9%
1st down0.2800.5602.6%
2nd down3.3086.6174.1%
3rd down-1.037-1.0374.8%
Standard downs0.2800.5601.7%
Passing downs1.8605.5809.7%
Eelijah Singleton · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.620 · Total -8.687
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.620-8.6873.2%
Pass-0.324-4.2105.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.214-4.8572.0%
2nd down-0.238-1.4294.3%
3rd down-0.600-2.4015.1%
Standard downs-0.963-7.7052.5%
Passing downs-0.164-0.9825.0%
Preston Kilgore · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.091 · Total 1.365
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0911.3653.0%
Pass0.0911.3655.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6722.6881.8%
2nd down-0.120-0.4812.5%
3rd down-0.120-0.8417.5%
Standard downs0.4152.9062.0%
Passing downs-0.193-1.5415.7%
Broderick Peters · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 0.746 · Total 4.475
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7464.4752.9%
Pass0.7464.4754.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.4644.3923.2%
2nd down0.2240.4483.0%
3rd down-0.365-0.3652.7%
Standard downs1.2605.0412.8%
Passing downs-0.283-0.5673.3%
Grant Page · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.559 · Total 3.353
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5593.3532.7%
Pass0.5593.3535.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.613-1.2262.0%
2nd down1.1454.5795.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.429-1.7152.4%
Passing downs2.5345.0683.5%
Where Southern Miss sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.020 (14th percentile; 138 teams)14thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.420 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.200 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.016 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.139 (62nd percentile; 138 teams)62ndDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.148 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.429 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.184 (66th percentile; 138 teams)66thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.134 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18th
Values and percentiles
Southern Miss metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.02014th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.42041st138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.20034th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.0169th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.13962nd138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.14825th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42928th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.18466th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13418th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 253 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.0 yards (25th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.0 per completion. Completion 59.3%, 6.8 yards per attempt, pass PPA -0.02.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense59.4%62.8%-3.5224 / 253
Defense allowed63.0%60.5%+2.5173 / 199

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Southern Miss.

Target mix by zone, Southern Miss offense
Short left32% · 77Short middle19% · 45Short right36% · 86Deep left8% · 19Deep middle2% · 5Deep right4% · 9

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Southern Miss passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense25399%8.05.059.3%-0.02-3.5 pp224
Passing defense19999%9.15.463.3%0.28+2.5 pp173

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2364.648.4%0.173.501.101.0010.3%80.0%
Defense allowed3335.045.5%0.183.201.101.6015.5%79.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense234 / 236232412110223 / 223 · 100.0%
Defense allowed328 / 3333231018550310 / 310 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.5 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-9.7-2.05.8W1W2W2 vs Auburn: -3.0 ppW3W3 vs UConn: -6.9 ppW4W4 vs Tulane: +3.0 ppW6W6 vs Troy: +5.8 ppW7W7 vs Arkansas State: -7.8 ppW8W8 vs Louisiana: -9.7 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Alcorn State270———7.90.13575.60.46
W2Auburn333366.7%69.6%-3.0 pp3.8-0.07232.4-0.16
W3UConn515156.9%63.8%-6.9 pp7.7-0.29273.80.12
W4Tulane302962.1%59.0%+3.0 pp10.10.64343.9-0.02
W6Troy393964.1%58.3%+5.8 pp11.20.16274.60.26
W7Arkansas State353452.9%60.8%-7.8 pp9.5-0.14253.2-0.36
W8Louisiana383855.3%65.0%-9.7 pp6.2-0.34436.70.41

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

32 punts · 39.2 gross yards/punt · 38.2 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 0 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 32/32 punts. Known net yards: 27/32 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 6.9 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Louisiana433.333.34/4
Week 7 · Arkansas State343.737.73/3
Week 6 · Troy233.033.02/2
Week 4 · Tulane941.942.77/9
Week 3 · UConn534.033.85/5
Team style
Rating history