Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

South Florida

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

South Florida's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 67 across 8 systems; best 46, worst 76, so they disagree by 30 places.

Lab EPA
#67
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#54
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#63
down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#46
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#76
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#75
down 5 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#73
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#67
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#70 of 138
Schedule strength
#127 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#96 of 138
Game control
#91 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#79 of 138
Offense
#91 of 138
Defense
#73 of 138
Special teams
#38 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

South Florida · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

5-2 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.000 net EPA/play

#67

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

3.08 points

#54 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +10.02 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -7.48, schedule #120 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -4.70. That is worth +2.54 on its own; the preseason prior of +4.74 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +3.08.

How each game enters this SRS rating

South Florida · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Florida International
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401862699
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.76379.52%-4.220.714-0.4020.312
Week 2 · Army
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862702
+4.00 → +4.00+2.500.79379.90%+3.730.6430.3701.013
Week 3 · Delaware State
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401862777
+42.00 → +35.00-2.500.824910.29%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.343-2.5720.772
Week 4 · Bowling Green
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401862785
+8.00 → +8.00+2.500.857210.69%-11.981.123-1.281-0.158
Week 5 · Temple
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862792
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.890911.11%-6.53-0.722-0.725-1.448
Week 6 · UTSA
away · 2026-10-08 · ID 401862794
-7.00 → -7.00+2.500.925911.55%+3.69-0.5200.426-0.094
Week 7 · Kent State
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862806
+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.962212.00%-11.952.940-1.4331.507

Game terms +1.90 points; prior term +1.18 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +3.08 points. The preseason prior is +4.74 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

2.2 SP+ points

#63 · Down 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-1.84 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#75 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -10.47 on 343 plays; defense -8.63 on 386 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks South Florida 13 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
5-2 · conf 1-2 · home 3-1 · away 2-1 · expected wins 4.3
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4 ATS (-1.1 avg) · 2025: 8-5 ATS (+7.8 avg)
Head coach
Brian Hartline · hired 2025-12-03 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #50 (198 pts) · 2025 #65 (189 pts) · 2026 #90 (180 pts)
Returning
13% of production · 16% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing6%1%
Receiving24%31%
Rushing-1%18%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back183.000.856315.41
Defensive Line173.000.854814.53
Linebacker63.000.85915.15
Offensive Line133.000.851711.07
Quarterback33.000.86262.59
Receiver133.080.853411.09
Running Back53.000.85764.29
Special Teams82.880.83706.70

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
D.J. Crowther · RB

CFBD athlete 5085507. South Florida (2026–2026); Dartmouth (2022–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1319826.8%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 45.9%

1st 32.5% · 2nd 25.5% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 31.6% · Passing downs 16.5%

2022: 3★ · 0.8100
Jason Collins Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5154559. South Florida (2026–2026); Morgan State (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1254213.1%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 21.2%

1st 16.0% · 2nd 13.5% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 14.2% · Passing downs 10.5%

Not linked
Nico Gramatica · PK

CFBD athlete 5149075. South Florida (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR1.82013—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 3★ · 0.8169
Alvon Isaac · RB

CFBD athlete 5193089. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 10.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Arhmad Branch · WR

CFBD athlete 5125521. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.3%
Pass 17.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 26.7%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 17.3%

Not linked
Bryson Rodgers · WR

CFBD athlete 4870927. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.5%
Pass 23.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 14.2% · 3rd 11.7%

Standard downs 8.3% · Passing downs 15.0%

Not linked
Cameron Seldon · WR

CFBD athlete 4870941. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 8.9% · Rush 2.0%

1st 5.5% · 2nd 5.8% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 8.6%

Not linked
Chase Garnett · RB

CFBD athlete 5218443. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.3%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Evan Dangler · TE

CFBD athlete 5117848. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Joshua Porter · WR

CFBD athlete 5146576. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.0%
Pass 22.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.2% · 2nd 9.9% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 8.0% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Kade Caton · TE

CFBD athlete 5156110. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Kenny Odom · WR

CFBD athlete 5083068. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Luke Clyburn · TE

CFBD athlete 5300511. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 4.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Luke Kromenhoek · QB

CFBD athlete 5079542. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 7.9%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 8.2%

Standard downs 7.0% · Passing downs 1.2%

Not linked
Michael Van Buren Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5079620. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Mudia Reuben · WR

CFBD athlete 4826505. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 11.3% · Rush 0.6%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Tray Kinkle · RB

CFBD athlete 5296023. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 16.7%

1st 8.1% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 16.7%

Standard downs 9.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Wyatt Sullivan · TE

CFBD athlete 4869390. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 44 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
A'mon Lane-Ganus · CBAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Amarion Fortenberry · CBKansas State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Arhmad Branch · WRPurdue2026-01-063★ / 0.8800Immediate
Armani Winfield · WRColorado State2026-01-124★ / —Immediate
Asani Redwood · DLWest Virginia2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Ayden Jackson · SGeorgia Southern2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Bryson Rodgers · WROhio State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
C.J. Hicks · EDGEOhio State2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Caleb Cook · IOLGeorgia Southern2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cameron Seldon · WRVirginia Tech2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cash Hudson · IOLMissouri State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
D.J. Crowther · RBDartmouth2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Devin Davis · IOLCharlotte2026-01-153★ / 0.8100TBD
Don Volante III · LSWest Florida2026-01-143★ / 0.8000Immediate
Ethan Green · OTCincinnati2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Grayson Howard · LBFlorida2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Harrysson Ngassa · EDGEIllinois2026-04-302★ / —Immediate
Israel Boyce · SWest Virginia2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
JR Rosenberg · STexas A&M2026-01-153★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jaron Glover · WRMississippi State2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jason Collins Jr. · RBMorgan State2026-01-073★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jayden Bradford · QBLiberty2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jaylin Acevedo · OTNavy2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Julius Tate · IOLCoastal Carolina2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
KJ Cooper · QBTexas Southern2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kade Caton · TEOregon2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kahari Finley · OTMorgan State2026-01-073★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kenny Odom · WRUTEP2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Lawson Thorn · KWingate2026-01-13— / —Immediate
Luke Clyburn · TEFurman2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Luke Kromenhoek · QBMississippi State2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Major Dillard · DLNorfolk State2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Malcolm Ziglar · SNorth Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
Marshon Oxley · EDGEWest Virginia2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Michael Harris · LBMaryland2026-05-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Michael Van Buren Jr. · QBLSU2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Wooten · IOLArizona2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Sam Robinson · LBRutgers2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Shamar Meikle · EDGEOregon State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tayvion Beasley · CBBYU2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Teddy Foster · CBFlorida2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Terrell Jones · DLVirginia2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Terry Simmons · DLDuke2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Za'Quan Bryan · CBMinnesota2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 34 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Zouagui · KKentucky2026-01-113★ / 0.8300Immediate
Alvon Isaac · RBNot reported2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Withdrawn
Boogsie Silvera · SSacramento State2026-01-153★ / 0.8000Immediate
Brandon Winton · WREast Tennessee State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Byrum Brown · QBAuburn2026-01-064★ / 0.9400Immediate
Chas Nimrod · WRAuburn2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Christian Neptune · WRAuburn2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cole Best · IOLAuburn2026-01-133★ / 0.8900PendingAppeal
Cole Skinner · IOLAuburn2026-01-123★ / 0.8800Immediate
Derrick McCormick Jr. · LBSouth Carolina State2026-02-043★ / —Immediate
Dinellson Exume · DLNot reported2025-12-013★ / —Immediate
Dorian Mallary Jr. · CBNot reported2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Fred Gaskin · SAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Gavin Jenkins · CBAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ira Singleton · EDGESMU2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Izaiah Guy · CBLiberty2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
James Chenault Jr. · CBUtah2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jarvis Lee · CBSMU2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaylen Johnson · RBBethune-Cookman2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Jeremiah Koger · WRAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jonas Duclona · CBGeorgia Tech2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jonathan Echols · TEAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
K'wan Powell · RBNot reported2026-01-163★ / —Immediate
Kajuan Banks · CBTulane2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Keshaun Singleton · WRAuburn2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Khalil Walker · IOLHawai'i2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kory Pettigrew · WRAuburn2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Locklan Hewlett · QBAuburn2026-01-033★ / 0.8500Immediate
Marcelis Tate · QBTennessee State2026-01-033★ / —Immediate
Nykahi Davenport · RBAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Rocco Nicholl · LBKent State2026-01-243★ / 0.8400Immediate
Traevon Mitchell · DLNot reported2025-12-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tyler Williams · WRNot reported2026-01-054★ / —Immediate
Tyreek Major · IOLWestern Kentucky2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at South Florida. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Brian Hartline · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 9 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Brian Hartline · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Kevin Patrick · interim

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-11-30. Effective dates: 2025-12-17 to unknown.

  3. 2023–2025 · Alex Golesh

    23–15 · 38 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-04. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-17.

  4. 2022–2022 · Daniel Da Prato · interim

    0–3 · 3 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2022-11-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2020–2022 · Jeff Scott

    4–26 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2019-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2017–2019 · Charlie Strong

    21–16 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2016-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2013–2016 · Willie Taggart

    24–25 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2010–2012 · Skip Holtz

    16–21 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2010-01-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 2000–2009 · Jim Leavitt

    75–44 · 119 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Hired 1995-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Brian Hartline · incomplete attribution0–0——2.7-1.390—
2025 · Alex Golesh9–36–20–011.612.665—
2025 · Kevin Patrick0–10–00–111.612.665—
2024 · Alex Golesh7–64–41–0-2.3-4.550—
2023 · Alex Golesh7–64–41–0-6.6-10.576—
2022 · Jeff Scott · incomplete attribution1–8——-17-1291—
2022 · Daniel Da Prato · incomplete attribution0–3——-17-1291—
2021 · Jeff Scott2–101–70–0-12.1-10.563—
2020 · Jeff Scott1–80–70–0-11.4—101—
2019 · Charlie Strong4–82–60–0-9.8-8.377—
2018 · Charlie Strong7–63–50–1-1.2-1165—
2017 · Charlie Strong10–26–21–010.28.97621
2016 · Willie Taggart · incomplete attribution10–2——9.87.26619
2015 · Willie Taggart8–56–20–13.68.466—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-19 18:20:14 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play64 / 13854.033 / 13876.6
Success rate30 / 13878.879 / 13843.1
Explosiveness131 / 1385.12 / 13899.3
Standard-down success20 / 13886.191 / 13834.3
Passing-down success43 / 13869.354 / 13861.3
Pass PPA88 / 13836.550 / 13864.2
Rush PPA52 / 13862.825 / 13882.5
Pass explosiveness137 / 1380.715 / 13889.8
Rush explosiveness62 / 13855.54 / 13897.8
Line yards90 / 13835.034 / 13875.9
Second-level yards38 / 13873.065 / 13853.3
Open-field yards80 / 13842.374 / 13846.7
Stuff rate113 / 13818.217 / 13888.3
Power success61 / 13856.2T57 / 13858.8
HavocT28 / 13879.9T71 / 13848.5
Front-seven havocT84 / 13837.217 / 13888.3
DB havocT8 / 13894.5T136 / 1381.1
Points / opportunity44 / 13868.69 / 13894.2
Average field positionT20 / 13885.4T17 / 13886.9
Field-position expected points21 / 13885.432 / 13877.4

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

D.J. Crowther · RBUsage 26.8% · Avg PPA 0.164 · Total 18.488
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.16418.48826.8%
Pass0.4814.8145.2%
Rush0.15415.71745.9%
1st down0.0694.32732.5%
2nd down0.36613.18625.5%
3rd down0.0770.84914.3%
Standard downs0.11710.63531.6%
Passing downs0.3577.85316.5%
Jason Collins Jr. · RBUsage 13.1% · Avg PPA 0.133 · Total 7.310
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1337.31013.1%
Pass-0.133-1.0604.2%
Rush0.1788.37021.2%
1st down0.2166.68416.0%
2nd down-0.075-1.41913.5%
3rd down0.4092.0446.5%
Standard downs0.1887.70614.2%
Passing downs-0.028-0.39610.5%
Bryson Rodgers · WRUsage 10.5% · Avg PPA 0.471 · Total 20.717
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47120.71710.5%
Pass0.47120.71723.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6249.3647.7%
2nd down0.3016.01214.2%
3rd down0.5935.34111.7%
Standard downs0.65515.7228.3%
Passing downs0.2504.99615.0%
Joshua Porter · WRUsage 10.0% · Avg PPA 0.309 · Total 12.994
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.30912.99410.0%
Pass0.30912.99422.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.227-3.6278.2%
2nd down0.4386.1349.9%
3rd down0.4615.06814.3%
Standard downs0.0791.8218.0%
Passing downs0.58811.17414.3%
Arhmad Branch · WRUsage 8.3% · Avg PPA 0.528 · Total 7.924
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5287.9248.3%
Pass0.5287.92417.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5132.0514.5%
2nd down-0.333-0.9995.0%
3rd down0.8596.87226.7%
Standard downs0.1340.8024.7%
Passing downs0.7917.12317.3%
Tray Kinkle · RBUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.780 · Total 3.899
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7803.8997.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.7803.89916.7%
1st down0.9892.9688.1%
2nd down0.2770.2774.3%
3rd down0.6530.65316.7%
Standard downs0.7803.8999.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Alvon Isaac · RBUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.349 · Total 1.396
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3491.3966.1%
Pass0.7380.7382.9%
Rush0.2190.65810.0%
1st down0.2770.5545.4%
2nd down0.4210.8418.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1760.5275.8%
Passing downs0.8690.8697.1%
Cameron Seldon · WRUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.775 · Total 13.175
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.77513.1755.5%
Pass0.84711.8538.9%
Rush0.4411.3232.0%
1st down0.7706.1595.5%
2nd down0.8435.0605.8%
3rd down0.6521.9575.6%
Standard downs0.5705.1284.1%
Passing downs1.0068.0488.6%
Mudia Reuben · WRUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA -0.563 · Total -9.577
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.563-9.5775.5%
Pass-0.264-4.21811.3%
Rush-5.359-5.3590.6%
1st down-1.473-8.8374.2%
2nd down0.9146.4006.7%
3rd down0.3060.6113.8%
Standard downs-1.082-10.8174.7%
Passing downs0.1771.2407.4%
Luke Kromenhoek · QBUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.855 · Total 13.687
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.85513.6875.4%
Pass0.6062.4232.9%
Rush0.93911.2647.9%
1st down-0.340-1.3612.8%
2nd down1.0336.2016.1%
3rd down1.2655.0608.2%
Standard downs0.76111.4157.0%
Passing downs2.2722.2721.2%
Wyatt Sullivan · TEUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA -0.026 · Total -0.361
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.026-0.3614.7%
Pass-0.026-0.3619.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.124-1.1156.3%
2nd down0.1500.4503.0%
3rd down0.1520.3043.8%
Standard downs-0.055-0.6655.6%
Passing downs0.1520.3042.3%
Evan Dangler · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 0.359 · Total 2.514
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3592.5142.9%
Pass0.3592.5146.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8992.6962.6%
2nd down0.2550.7643.7%
3rd down-0.946-0.9462.6%
Standard downs0.9523.8102.3%
Passing downs-0.432-1.2964.5%
Luke Clyburn · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.702 · Total -1.404
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.702-1.4041.7%
Pass-0.702-1.4044.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.702-1.4044.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.702-1.4042.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Michael Van Buren Jr. · QBUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 4.357 · Total 8.714
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall4.3578.7141.7%
Pass4.3578.7143.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down3.2953.2951.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs3.2953.2951.3%
Passing downs5.4195.4192.7%
Chase Garnett · RBUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 3.477 · Total 3.477
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall3.4773.4771.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush3.4773.4773.3%
1st down3.4773.4772.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs3.4773.4771.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Kade Caton · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.627 · Total -1.254
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.627-1.2541.5%
Pass-0.627-1.2543.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.962-0.9621.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.292-0.2924.8%
Standard downs-0.627-1.2542.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Kenny Odom · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 2.272 · Total 2.272
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.2722.2721.5%
Pass2.2722.2722.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down2.2722.2724.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs2.2722.2727.1%
Where South Florida sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.144 (54th percentile; 138 teams)54thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.473 (79th percentile; 138 teams)79thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.096 (5th percentile; 138 teams)5thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.175 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.141 (63rd percentile; 138 teams)63rdDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.006 (77th percentile; 138 teams)77thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.414 (43rd percentile; 138 teams)43rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 0.993 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.156 (49th percentile; 138 teams)49th
Values and percentiles
South Florida metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.14454th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.47379th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.0965th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.17536th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.14163rd138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.00677th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.41443rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness0.99399th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15649th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 183 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.2 yards (31st percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.1 per completion. Completion 63.9%, 7.2 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.26.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.6%62.7%-1.0146 / 183
Defense allowed62.0%61.6%+0.4166 / 195

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is South Florida.

Target mix by zone, South Florida offense
Short left29% · 53Short middle18% · 33Short right39% · 71Deep left5% · 9Deep middle6% · 10Deep right3% · 5

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
South Florida passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense18399%8.26.163.9%0.26-1.0 pp146
Passing defense19599%8.14.962.6%0.19+0.4 pp166

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2334.350.2%0.243.101.201.1017.4%76.5%
Defense allowed2544.042.5%-0.052.701.001.1023.3%70.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense227 / 2331726113770210 / 213 · 98.6%
Defense allowed252 / 254251313110237 / 240 · 98.8%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -1.0 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-12.41.114.7W1W1 vs Florida International: +4.5 ppW2W2 vs Army: +1.6 ppW3W4W4 vs Bowling Green: -0.5 ppW5W5 vs Temple: -9.6 ppW6W6 vs UTSA: -12.4 ppW7W7 vs Kent State: +14.7 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Florida International181861.1%56.6%+4.5 pp11.10.19382.8-0.10
W2Army302962.1%60.5%+1.6 pp9.60.41255.20.45
W3Delaware State350———7.20.57319.30.94
W4Bowling Green111163.6%64.1%-0.5 pp8.1-0.17423.80.48
W5Temple323253.1%62.8%-9.6 pp8.3-0.10343.40.08
W6UTSA302951.7%64.1%-12.4 pp7.70.27313.60.04
W7Kent State272781.5%66.8%+14.7 pp6.10.28322.6-0.06

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

24 punts · 45.5 gross yards/punt · 41.5 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 24/24 punts. Known net yards: 19/24 punts.

Our punt returns

5 returns · 8.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 5/5 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Kent State347.730.02/3
Week 6 · UTSA545.845.34/5
Week 5 · Temple346.041.02/3
Week 4 · Bowling Green443.339.73/4
Week 3 · Delaware State152.052.01/1
Team style
Rating history