Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

SMU

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

SMU's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 32.5 across 8 systems; best 21, worst 62, so they disagree by 41 places.

Lab EPA
#62
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#28
up 172026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#21
up 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#21
up 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#27
up 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#43
up 13 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#37
up 152026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#62
up 122026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#21 of 138
Schedule strength
#73 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#33 of 138
Game control
#38 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#32 of 138
Offense
#27 of 138
Defense
#39 of 138
Special teams
#114 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

SMU · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.020 net EPA/play

#62

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

7.81 points

#28 · Up 17 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +12.43 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.82, schedule #81 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.65. That is worth +8.61 on its own; the preseason prior of +5.39 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +7.81.

How each game enters this SRS rating

SMU · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Florida State
away · 2026-09-07 · ID 401858212
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.76379.44%+6.690.5190.6311.150
Week 2 · UC Davis
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858223
+46.00 → +35.00-2.500.79379.81%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.187-2.4520.736
Week 3 · Louisville
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858230
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.824910.19%+9.17-0.7640.9350.170
Week 4 · Missouri State
home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401858241
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.857210.59%-11.700.794-1.239-0.445
Week 5 · Boston College
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858246
+9.00 → +9.00-2.500.890911.01%-1.580.716-0.1730.542
Week 7 · Virginia
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858268
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.962211.89%+2.490.8920.2971.188
Week 8 · California
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858270
+39.00 → +35.00-2.501.000012.36%-7.104.016-0.8773.139

Game terms +6.48 points; prior term +1.33 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +7.81 points. The preseason prior is +5.39 with 24.71% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

13.4 SP+ points

#21 · Up 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

6.12 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#43 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 5.33 on 409 plays; defense -0.79 on 360 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks SMU 34 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-1 · conf 4-1 · home 5-0 · away 1-1 · expected wins 5.5
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #19 · Coaches Poll #16
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-3-2 ATS (-0.9 avg) · 2025: 6-7 ATS (+1.3 avg)
Head coach
Rhett Lashlee · hired 2021-11-30 · 31-10 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #107 (142 pts) · 2025 #31 (221 pts) · 2026 #32 (226 pts)
Returning
57% of production · 58% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing97%99%
Receiving37%35%
Rushing1%30%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back113.000.86679.53
Defensive Line93.000.86627.80
Linebacker73.000.86796.08
Offensive Line143.290.876512.27
Quarterback43.250.86343.45
Receiver173.120.864614.70
Running Back34.000.90462.71
Special Teams33.330.88092.64

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Kevin Jennings · QB

CFBD athlete 5084084. SMU (2022–2026)

Passing WEPA0.47921052.0%
Pass 91.1% · Rush 15.0%

1st 47.3% · 2nd 53.5% · 3rd 60.7%

Standard downs 43.5% · Passing downs 72.9%

2022: 3★ · 0.8378
Kendrick Raphael · RB

CFBD athlete 4899368. California (2025–2025); NC State (2023–2024); SMU (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.25912025.9%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 48.3%

1st 27.9% · 2nd 25.8% · 3rd 18.0%

Standard downs 31.4% · Passing downs 12.1%

2023: 3★ · 0.8875
Kevin Jennings · QB

CFBD athlete 5084084. SMU (2022–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1063652.0%
Pass 91.1% · Rush 15.0%

1st 47.3% · 2nd 53.5% · 3rd 60.7%

Standard downs 43.5% · Passing downs 72.9%

2022: 3★ · 0.8378
Dramekco Green · RB

CFBD athlete 5207927. SMU (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0863213.8%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 26.1%

1st 15.8% · 2nd 12.1% · 3rd 13.7%

Standard downs 16.8% · Passing downs 5.4%

2025: 4★ · 0.8918
Nick Reed · PK

CFBD athlete 5162847. New Hampshire (2025–2025); Buffalo (2023–2024); SMU (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-5.0006—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: stars unavailable
Brendan Baird · PK

CFBD athlete 5381521. SMU (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.2305—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Aljour Miles II · WR

CFBD athlete 5245414. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Carterrious Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5164352. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Charlie Fiser · QB

CFBD athlete 5084086. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 15.4%

Not linked
Christian Rhodes · RB

CFBD athlete 5244759. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 12.0%

1st 4.6% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Cole Leinart · QB

CFBD athlete 5161878. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Derrick McFall · WR

CFBD athlete 5079523. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 6.2%

1st 8.2% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
EJ Kelly · RB

CFBD athlete 5280790. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.7%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Jakai Anderson · WR

CFBD athlete 5216561. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Jalen Cooper · WR

CFBD athlete 5207842. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 13.0% · Rush 0.5%

1st 5.2% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 10.8%

Not linked
Jalen Hale · WR

CFBD athlete 4870776. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 1.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Jordyn Adams · WR

CFBD athlete 5381512. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Randy Pittman · TE

CFBD athlete 4870954. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 11.0% · Rush 0.4%

1st 4.9% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 6.4%

Not linked
Tripp Riordan · TE

CFBD athlete 4920161. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 8.1% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Ty Hawkins · QB

CFBD athlete 5141487. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.2%
Pass 24.1% · Rush 7.7%

1st 14.1% · 2nd 13.5% · 3rd 21.1%

Standard downs 13.7% · Passing downs 20.0%

Not linked
Tyrone Crethers · WR

CFBD athlete 5290936. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
William Fierro · RB

CFBD athlete 5160121. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 1.7% · Rush 9.2%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 7.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Yamir Knight · WR

CFBD athlete 5121750. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.2%
Pass 16.1% · Rush 0.8%

1st 5.8% · 2nd 9.0% · 3rd 13.5%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Yannick Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5155519. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 14.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 12.1% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 12.9%

Not linked
Zack Turner · TE

CFBD athlete 5159083. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 9.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.1% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 15 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Caden Marshall · LBBowling Green2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Christian Davis · DLLouisiana Tech2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ira Singleton · EDGESouth Florida2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jalen Hale · WRAlabama2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jamal Anderson · LBClemson2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jarvis Lee · CBSouth Florida2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jayvon Thomas · CBTexas A&M2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kendrick Raphael · RBCalifornia2026-01-134★ / 0.9200Immediate
Mabrey Mettauer · QBSam Houston2026-07-243★ / —Immediate
Malcolm Alcorn-Crowder · DLKansas State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Marques White · EDGEMassachusetts2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Randy Pittman Jr. · TEFlorida State2026-01-113★ / 0.8800Immediate
Theo Melin Ohrstrom · TETexas A&M2026-01-124★ / 0.9000Immediate
Trey Jackson · TETexas Tech2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Yannick Smith · WREast Carolina2026-01-054★ / 0.9200Immediate
Outgoing · 26 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Moore · TENot reported2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Billy Walton III · EDGEOklahoma State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Blake Burris · DLNot reported2026-01-03— / —Immediate
Braeden Flowers · EDGENot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Chris Johnson Jr. · RBClemson2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Collin Rogers · KFlorida Atlantic2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
DJ Warner · EDGEWashington State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Damarjhe Lewis · DLWashington State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Devon Martin · TENot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Elijah Pratt · SUAB2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Waller · PNC State2026-01-06— / —Immediate
James Larson · TENot reported2026-04-03— / —Immediate
Jaxson Lavender · WRTarleton State2026-02-033★ / —Immediate
Justin Medlock · LBBoston College2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
King Large · OTMissouri State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kyle Ferm · LBLiberty2026-01-083★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kyron Chambers · CBUNLV2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lance Beeghley · WRIowa2026-01-183★ / 0.8300Immediate
Mark Iheanachor · LBUNLV2026-01-253★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nolan Akins · LSOklahoma State2026-01-04— / —Immediate
Omari Abor · EDGENot reported2025-12-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Paris Patterson · IOLTexas2026-03-313★ / 0.8600Immediate
Sam Keltner · KOklahoma State2026-01-08— / —Immediate
TJ Harden · RBNot reported2026-08-203★ / —Immediate
Zach Hernandez · RBNot reported2026-01-04— / —Immediate
Zakye Barker · LBNorth Texas2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at SMU. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Rhett Lashlee · career 38–16 across 5 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 24 appointments
  1. 2022–present · Rhett Lashlee · active at capture

    38–16 · 54 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2021-11-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2021 · Jim Leavitt

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2021 · Sonny Dykes

    30–17 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2015–2017 · Chad Morris

    14–23 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2014-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2008–2014 · June Jones

    36–43 · 79 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2008-01-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2002–2007 · Phil Bennett

    18–52 · 70 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2001-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1997–2001 · Mike Cavan

    22–34 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1991–1996 · Tom Rossley

    15–48–3 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1989–1990 · Forrest Gregg

    3–19 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1982–1986 · Bobby Collins

    43–14–1 · 58 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1976–1981 · Ron Meyer

    34–32–1 · 67 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1973–1975 · Dave Smith

    16–15–2 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1962–1972 · Hayden Fry

    49–66–1 · 116 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1957–1961 · Bill Meek

    17–29–4 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1953–1956 · Chalmer Woodward

    19–20–1 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1950–1952 · H.N. Russell

    13–15–2 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1945–1949 · Madison Bell

    32–16–5 · 53 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1942–1944 · James Stewart

    10–18–2 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1935–1941 · Madison Bell

    47–24–3 · 74 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1922–1934 · Ray Morrison

    82–31–20 · 133 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1921–1921 · Choc Kelly

    1–6–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1921–1921 · Bill Cunningham

    1–6–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1917–1921 · J. Rix

    16–19–7 · 42 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1916–1916 · Ray Morrison

    0–8–2 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Rhett Lashlee · incomplete attribution0–0——12.97.932—
2025 · Rhett Lashlee9–46–21–013.41131—
2024 · Rhett Lashlee11–38–10–117.515.710712
2023 · Rhett Lashlee11–39–00–110.18.97222
2022 · Rhett Lashlee7–65–30–14.71.982—
2021 · Jim Leavitt · incomplete attribution0–0——8.96.153—
2021 · Sonny Dykes · incomplete attribution8–4——8.96.153—
2020 · Sonny Dykes7–34–30–09.2—81—
2019 · Sonny Dykes10–36–20–14.47.768—
2018 · Sonny Dykes5–74–40–0-5.4-9.487—
2017 · Chad Morris7–64–40–1-2.9-280—
2016 · Chad Morris5–73–50–0-10.8-8.375—
2015 · Chad Morris2–101–70–0-17.5-13.181—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-24 19:36:25 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play21 / 13885.456 / 13859.9
Success rate21 / 13885.432 / 13877.4
Explosiveness42 / 13870.1108 / 13821.9
Standard-down success22 / 13884.749 / 13865.0
Passing-down success18 / 13887.610 / 13893.4
Pass PPA4 / 13897.836 / 13874.5
Rush PPA87 / 13837.272 / 13848.2
Pass explosiveness23 / 13883.9119 / 13813.9
Rush explosiveness120 / 13813.1106 / 13823.4
Line yards94 / 13832.136 / 13874.5
Second-level yards88 / 13836.578 / 13843.8
Open-field yards60 / 13856.9106 / 13823.4
Stuff rate100 / 13827.749 / 13865.0
Power success101 / 13827.06 / 13896.4
HavocT23 / 13883.618 / 13887.6
Front-seven havocT52 / 13861.77 / 13895.6
DB havocT12 / 13891.6T101 / 13825.9
Points / opportunity47 / 13866.483 / 13840.1
Average field position4 / 13897.8T22 / 13884.3
Field-position expected points4 / 13897.818 / 13887.6

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Kevin Jennings · QBUsage 51.7% · Avg PPA 0.399 · Total 100.668
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.399100.66851.7%
Pass0.507108.99291.1%
Rush0.0140.48914.6%
1st down0.38441.12347.3%
2nd down0.13511.08652.9%
3rd down0.93950.69560.7%
Standard downs0.35954.27843.5%
Passing downs0.45946.39172.1%
Kendrick Raphael · RBUsage 25.9% · Avg PPA 0.286 · Total 36.027
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.28636.02725.9%
Pass0.4804.7964.2%
Rush0.26931.23148.3%
1st down0.1378.62927.9%
2nd down0.1144.54725.8%
3rd down0.2323.71218.0%
Standard downs0.27730.17531.4%
Passing downs0.3445.85212.1%
Ty Hawkins · QBUsage 15.2% · Avg PPA 0.528 · Total 10.034
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.52810.03415.2%
Pass0.80111.21324.1%
Rush-0.236-1.1797.7%
1st down0.7066.35114.1%
2nd down0.4842.42213.5%
3rd down1.3445.37521.1%
Standard downs0.4385.69613.7%
Passing downs0.7234.33720.0%
Dramekco Green · RBUsage 13.8% · Avg PPA 0.013 · Total 0.503
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0130.50313.8%
Pass1.0974.3882.8%
Rush-0.111-3.88626.1%
1st down0.0440.92815.8%
2nd down-0.269-2.95512.1%
3rd down0.3612.53013.7%
Standard downs0.0080.29216.8%
Passing downs0.0530.2115.4%
Yamir Knight · WRUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA 0.609 · Total 24.342
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.60924.3428.2%
Pass0.81130.81216.1%
Rush-3.235-6.4690.8%
1st down0.5316.8975.8%
2nd down0.3544.9589.0%
3rd down0.94911.38513.5%
Standard downs0.60612.1115.8%
Passing downs0.61212.23114.3%
Yannick Smith · WRUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.709 · Total 16.300
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.70916.3006.7%
Pass0.70916.30014.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8114.8683.8%
2nd down0.5447.06612.1%
3rd down1.0914.3666.3%
Standard downs0.3713.7154.1%
Passing downs0.96812.58512.9%
Christian Rhodes · RBUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA 0.500 · Total 4.499
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5004.4996.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5004.49912.0%
1st down0.5251.5744.6%
2nd down0.5712.2829.3%
3rd down-0.428-0.4284.3%
Standard downs0.3162.5297.7%
Passing downs1.9701.9702.7%
Jalen Cooper · WRUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA 0.654 · Total 17.666
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65417.6666.4%
Pass0.61616.00613.0%
Rush1.6591.6590.5%
1st down0.3203.2035.2%
2nd down0.0590.5316.7%
3rd down1.74113.93110.7%
Standard downs0.4155.8054.7%
Passing downs0.91211.86010.8%
William Fierro · RBUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA -0.517 · Total -3.618
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.517-3.6185.6%
Pass-0.291-0.2911.7%
Rush-0.555-3.3279.2%
1st down-0.508-2.0306.3%
2nd down-0.533-1.0665.4%
3rd down-0.522-0.5225.3%
Standard downs-0.517-3.6187.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Derrick McFall · WRUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.295 · Total 6.784
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2956.7845.5%
Pass0.8088.0795.0%
Rush-0.100-1.2956.2%
1st down-0.107-1.7128.2%
2nd down1.5517.7553.7%
3rd down0.3700.7412.7%
Standard downs0.1843.5056.3%
Passing downs0.8203.2793.3%
Randy Pittman · TEUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.734 · Total 19.812
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.73419.8125.5%
Pass0.77120.05311.0%
Rush-0.241-0.2410.4%
1st down0.2983.2804.9%
2nd down0.6274.3904.5%
3rd down1.3406.6985.6%
Standard downs0.5159.2725.2%
Passing downs1.17110.5406.4%
Zack Turner · TEUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 1.545 · Total 4.634
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.5454.6345.5%
Pass1.5454.6349.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9791.9587.1%
2nd down2.6772.6776.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.9791.9584.8%
Passing downs2.6772.6777.7%
Jalen Hale · WRUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.702 · Total 11.931
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.70211.9314.0%
Pass0.85912.8817.5%
Rush-0.475-0.9501.0%
1st down0.5265.7815.7%
2nd down-0.227-0.9083.0%
3rd down3.5297.0582.7%
Standard downs0.3854.6204.0%
Passing downs1.4627.3114.2%
Charlie Fiser · QBUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA -0.140 · Total -0.280
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.140-0.2803.6%
Pass-0.140-0.2806.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.959-0.9596.3%
3rd down0.6790.67910.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.140-0.28015.4%
Jordyn Adams · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA -0.069 · Total -0.139
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.069-0.1393.6%
Pass-0.069-0.1396.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.160-0.1603.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.0210.02110.0%
Standard downs-0.160-0.1602.4%
Passing downs0.0210.0217.7%
Jakai Anderson · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.232 · Total 0.930
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2320.9303.2%
Pass0.2320.9306.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0291.0291.6%
2nd down-0.315-0.6305.4%
3rd down0.5300.5305.3%
Standard downs0.5501.1002.1%
Passing downs-0.085-0.1716.7%
Tripp Riordan · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.789 · Total 3.154
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7893.1543.2%
Pass0.7893.1546.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.3180.9548.1%
3rd down2.2002.2005.3%
Standard downs1.1261.1261.1%
Passing downs0.6762.02810.0%
EJ Kelly · RBUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 1.408 · Total 2.816
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.4082.8162.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush1.4082.8164.7%
1st down0.1180.1182.8%
2nd down2.6992.6994.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1180.1181.9%
Passing downs2.6992.6995.9%
Carterrious Brown · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.318 · Total 0.955
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3180.9552.3%
Pass0.3180.9554.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1380.2763.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.6790.6794.5%
Standard downs0.1380.2762.0%
Passing downs0.6790.6793.1%
Aljour Miles II · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA 2.625 · Total 2.625
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.6252.6251.8%
Pass2.6252.6253.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down2.6252.62510.0%
Standard downs2.6252.6252.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Cole Leinart · QBUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA 0.071 · Total 0.071
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0710.0711.8%
Pass0.0710.0713.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.0710.0716.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0710.0712.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tyrone Crethers · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA -0.959 · Total -0.959
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.959-0.9591.8%
Pass-0.959-0.9593.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.959-0.9596.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.959-0.9597.7%
Where SMU sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.246 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.487 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.272 (70th percentile; 138 teams)70thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.514 (98th percentile; 138 teams)98thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.064 (37th percentile; 138 teams)37thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.046 (60th percentile; 138 teams)60thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.372 (77th percentile; 138 teams)77thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.301 (22nd percentile; 138 teams)22ndDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.193 (88th percentile; 138 teams)88th
Values and percentiles
SMU metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.24685th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.48785th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.27270th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.51498th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.06437th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.04660th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.37277th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.30122nd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.19388th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 79% of 232 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.4 yards (40th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.9 per completion. Completion 73.3%, 9.5 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.53.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense71.3%61.8%+9.4160 / 232
Defense allowed64.2%63.7%+0.5148 / 208

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is SMU.

Target mix by zone, SMU offense
Short left20% · 39Short middle21% · 40Short right47% · 90Deep left3% · 5Deep middle2% · 4Deep right7% · 13

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
SMU passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense23279%8.45.973.3%0.53+9.4 pp160
Passing defense20879%7.25.360.6%0.14+0.5 pp148

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2494.347.0%0.102.801.001.2018.2%68.3%
Defense allowed2263.644.0%0.112.801.001.2018.5%54.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense241 / 249234158550205 / 236 · 86.9%
Defense allowed221 / 2262151121450158 / 200 · 79.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +9.4 pp. 5 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

0.010.220.3W1W2W3W3 vs Louisville: +5.8 ppW4W4 vs Missouri State: +20.3 ppW5W5 vs Boston College: +1.0 ppW7W7 vs Virginia: +4.1 ppW8W8 vs California: +15.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Florida State360————0.56315.00.13
W2UC Davis320———11.31.22243.9-0.26
W3Louisville353568.6%62.8%+5.8 pp8.80.19455.50.03
W4Missouri State393783.8%63.5%+20.3 pp8.50.40403.20.06
W5Boston College302965.5%64.5%+1.0 pp6.50.27321.80.03
W7Virginia363565.7%61.6%+4.1 pp6.30.37334.80.14
W8California242470.8%54.9%+15.9 pp10.90.85445.70.37

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

17 punts · 44.6 gross yards/punt · 37.3 net yards/punt

3 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 17/17 punts. Known net yards: 13/17 punts.

Our punt returns

13 returns · 8.5 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 12/13 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · California247.538.02/2
Week 7 · Virginia241.043.01/2
Week 5 · Boston College545.639.84/5
Week 4 · Missouri State158.0—0/1
Week 3 · Louisville339.734.33/3
Team style
Rating history