Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

San Diego State

2026 season

Pac-12
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

San Diego State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 105 across 8 systems; best 92, worst 116, so they disagree by 24 places.

Lab EPA
#116
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#101
down 52026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#104
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#116
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#105
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#105
down 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#92
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#116
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#104 of 138
Schedule strength
#83 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#70 of 138
Game control
#113 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#103 of 138
Offense
#118 of 138
Defense
#90 of 138
Special teams
#13 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

San Diego State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.109 net EPA/play

#116

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-5.79 points

#101 · Down 5 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -7.93 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +0.09, schedule #43 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +3.15. That is worth -7.84 on its own; the preseason prior of +1.41 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -5.79.

How each game enters this SRS rating

San Diego State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Portland State
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401860879
+33.00 → +33.00-2.500.76378.47%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.583-2.1170.466
Week 2 · UCLA
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858443
-18.00 → -18.00+2.500.79378.80%+12.00-1.3641.056-0.308
Week 3 · James Madison
home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401860887
-13.00 → -13.00-2.500.82499.15%+9.51-1.4180.870-0.548
Week 4 · Toledo
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401860893
-25.00 → -25.00+2.500.85729.51%+1.38-2.1390.131-2.007
Week 5 · Texas State
home · 2026-10-04 · ID 401860900
+2.00 → +2.00-2.500.89099.88%+2.15-0.0490.2120.163
Week 6 · Oregon State
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401860902
-52.00 → -35.00+2.500.925910.27%+7.09-3.3370.728-2.608
Week 7 · Fresno State
home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401860904
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.962210.67%+0.870.0530.0930.146
Week 8 · Colorado State
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401860905
-7.00 → -7.00+2.501.000011.09%-8.17-0.499-0.906-1.405

Game terms -6.10 points; prior term +0.31 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -5.79 points. The preseason prior is +1.41 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-8.6 SP+ points

#104 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-9.48 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#105 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -10.22 on 383 plays; defense -0.74 on 481 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks San Diego State 15 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 0-4 · expected wins 2.5
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-6 ATS (-9.0 avg) · 2025: 10-3 ATS (+7.4 avg)
Head coach
Sean Lewis · hired 2023-11-29 · 12-13 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #72 (171 pts) · 2025 #78 (172 pts) · 2026 #83 (184 pts)
Returning
99% of production · 100% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing100%100%
Receiving97%99%
Rushing100%100%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back113.000.85089.36
Defensive Line153.000.849812.75
Linebacker23.000.83811.68
Offensive Line123.000.846110.15
Quarterback43.000.85813.43
Receiver163.000.847813.57
Running Back43.000.86643.47
Special Teams63.000.83775.03

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Jayden Denegal · QB

CFBD athlete 4685311. San Diego State (2025–2026); Michigan (2022–2024)

Passing WEPA0.10514540.0%
Pass 83.0% · Rush 6.5%

1st 37.4% · 2nd 38.7% · 3rd 48.9%

Standard downs 33.9% · Passing downs 51.3%

2022: 3★ · 0.8870
Javion Kinnard · RB

CFBD athlete 5254150. San Diego State (2026–2026); Colorado State (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.2488622.4%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 38.1%

1st 25.7% · 2nd 21.8% · 3rd 19.4%

Standard downs 24.8% · Passing downs 17.9%

2025: 3★ · 0.8600
Lucky Sutton · RB

CFBD athlete 4912453. San Diego State (2022–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1457027.2%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 48.3%

1st 29.1% · 2nd 28.0% · 3rd 23.5%

Standard downs 28.6% · Passing downs 24.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8785
Josiah Lucas · RB

CFBD athlete 5245054. San Diego State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0803921.4%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 35.7%

1st 24.7% · 2nd 20.5% · 3rd 16.0%

Standard downs 24.0% · Passing downs 16.3%

Not linked
Cooper DiLeva · PK

CFBD athlete 5309724. San Diego State (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR6.61011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Bert Emanuel Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 4916888. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 11.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 5.8% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 6.0%

Not linked
Carson Diehl · WR

CFBD athlete 5291802. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
Christian Washington · RB

CFBD athlete 4912275. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 5.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Daishaun Davis · WR

CFBD athlete 5291794. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Donovan Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5302266. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 15.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 14.0%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 11.1%

Not linked
Draiden Trudeau · QB

CFBD athlete 5302259. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 16.3% · Rush 1.2%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 6.8% · 3rd 9.8%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 13.4%

Not linked
Jack Lua · TE

CFBD athlete 5302270. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jackson Ford · TE

CFBD athlete 5143596. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 8.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 1.2%

Not linked
Jacob Bostick · WR

CFBD athlete 4827041. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 11.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.4% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 9.8%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Jaylon Hawkins · WR

CFBD athlete 5216639. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.5%
Pass 16.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 7.9% · 3rd 7.0%

Standard downs 7.4% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Jordan Napier · WR

CFBD athlete 4918108. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 11.7% · Rush 1.1%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 5.5% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Jordin Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 5164340. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 0.8% · Rush 7.2%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 6.2%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Justius Lowe · WR

CFBD athlete 4912135. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 8.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Kime Fangupo · TE

CFBD athlete 5394483. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.6%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Nathan Acevedo · WR

CFBD athlete 5082315. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.2%
Pass 15.3% · Rush 0.7%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 7.9% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 9.1%

Not linked
Ryan Wolfer · TE

CFBD athlete 5175719. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.8% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 1.2% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Stone Saunders · QB

CFBD athlete 5141664. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——26.3%
Pass 64.1% · Rush 1.7%

1st 22.2% · 2nd 29.7% · 3rd 30.0%

Standard downs 21.8% · Passing downs 37.5%

Not linked
Will Cianfrini · WR

CFBD athlete 5146720. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 1.6%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 26 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aldrich Doe · WRBryant2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ayo Shotomide-King · WROklahoma State2026-01-303★ / 0.8500Immediate
Caleb Ricks · CBIdaho2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cameron Cooper · LBWestern Colorado2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carsten Mamaril · CBPortland State2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Charlton Luniewski · IOLMichigan State2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Dennis Jones · OTTexas Southern2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Djibril Rahman · EDGERutgers2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Evan Lawrence · OTIndiana2026-01-213★ / 0.8700Immediate
Gavriel Lightfoot · DLColorado2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Isaac Lucas · IOLBall State2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Isaiah Green · SPortland State2026-01-053★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jalen Thomeson · SOhio2026-01-062★ / —Immediate
Jason Oliver · CBSacramento State2026-01-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
Javion Kinnard · RBColorado State2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Justius Lowe · WROregon2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kai Wallin · EDGEOregon State2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Matthew Montgomery · OTWestern Illinois2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Mercer Luniewski · OTMichigan State2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Mike Lindsay · CBIdaho State2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nate Henrich · DLGannon2026-01-043★ / 0.8200Immediate
Sione Hala · LBWeber State2026-01-153★ / 0.8200Immediate
Solomon Davis · SOregon2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Stone Saunders · QBKentucky2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tuaoa Tauili'ili · DLPortland State2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Tyler Prasuhn · KArizona2026-01-162★ / —Immediate
Outgoing · 26 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Arthur Ban · TEArizona2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
August Salvati · EDGETroy2026-05-023★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ben Scolari · WRNot reported2025-12-313★ / —Immediate
Chase Duarte · IOLKansas State2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cincere Rhaney · RBSacramento State2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dalesean Staley · SNot reported2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Withdrawn
Dwayne McDougle · SNebraska2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Hunter Green · PWashington2026-01-052★ / —Immediate
Hunter Haines · SMontana2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Isaiah Buxton · CBSan José State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
JP Mialovski · QBNot reported2025-12-223★ / —Immediate
Jared Badie · EDGEBall State2026-02-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jeremiah Tuiileila · EDGENot reported2025-12-313★ / —Immediate
Jerry McClure · WRSan José State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Kodi Cornelius · DLNot reported2026-01-033★ / —Immediate
Kyle Crum · QBNot reported2026-01-013★ / —Immediate
Marcus Mozer · WRNorthern Colorado2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Mason Baker · OTNot reported2025-12-31— / —Immediate
Mikey Welsh · WRNot reported2025-12-31— / —Immediate
Myles Kitt-Denton · WRNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Owen Chambliss · LBNebraska2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Ryan Henderson · EDGETexas A&M2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Sidney Dupuy · DLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Tanner Williams · LBMontana2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Tiumalu Afalava · DLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Trey White · EDGETexas Tech2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at San Diego State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Sean Lewis · career 36–44 across 8 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 12 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Sean Lewis · active at capture

    12–13 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-11-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2020–2023 · Brady Hoke

    27–20 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2020-01-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2011–2019 · Rocky Long

    81–38 · 119 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Hired 2011-01-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2009–2010 · Brady Hoke

    13–12 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2006–2008 · Chuck Long

    9–27 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2005-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2002–2005 · Tom Craft

    19–29 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2001-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1994–2001 · Ted Tollner

    43–48 · 91 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1989–1993 · Al Luginbill

    31–25–3 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1986–1988 · Dennis Stolz

    16–19 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1981–1985 · Doug Scovil

    24–32–3 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1973–1980 · Claude Gilbert

    61–26–2 · 89 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1969–1972 · Don Coryell

    36–8 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Sean Lewis · incomplete attribution0–0——-8.7-7.183—
2025 · Sean Lewis9–46–20–16.73.678—
2024 · Sean Lewis3–92–50–0-15.4-16.672—
2023 · Brady Hoke4–82–60–0-10.3-9.878—
2022 · Brady Hoke7–65–30–1-4.4-6.965—
2021 · Brady Hoke12–27–21–08.35.26225
2020 · Brady Hoke4–44–20–05.32.8104—
2019 · Rocky Long10–35–31–021.791—
2018 · Rocky Long7–64–40–16-4.879—
2017 · Rocky Long10–36–20–14.53.177—
2016 · Rocky Long11–37–21–011.45.48225
2015 · Rocky Long11–39–01–086.270—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:07:55 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play128 / 1387.3106 / 13823.4
Success rate129 / 1386.6134 / 1382.9
Explosiveness83 / 13840.18 / 13894.9
Standard-down success123 / 13810.9133 / 1383.6
Passing-down success120 / 13813.1126 / 1388.8
Pass PPA130 / 1385.8112 / 13819.0
Rush PPA121 / 13812.473 / 13847.4
Pass explosiveness35 / 13875.264 / 13854.0
Rush explosiveness97 / 13829.910 / 13893.4
Line yards84 / 13839.4132 / 1384.4
Second-level yards113 / 13818.228 / 13880.3
Open-field yards93 / 13832.810 / 13893.4
Stuff rate108 / 13821.9137 / 1380.7
Power success125 / 1389.5132 / 1384.4
HavocT94 / 13831.4133 / 1383.6
Front-seven havocT65 / 13852.2T129 / 1385.8
DB havocT115 / 13816.1T118 / 13813.5
Points / opportunity106 / 13823.4117 / 13815.3
Average field positionT87 / 13836.1121 / 13812.4
Field-position expected points87 / 13837.2122 / 13811.7

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Jayden Denegal · QBUsage 40.0% · Avg PPA -0.083 · Total -14.430
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.083-14.43040.0%
Pass-0.048-7.46083.0%
Rush-0.194-2.9166.5%
1st down0.0483.27037.4%
2nd down-0.353-19.43138.7%
3rd down0.2079.53848.9%
Standard downs-0.091-8.64833.9%
Passing downs-0.074-5.78351.3%
Lucky Sutton · RBUsage 27.2% · Avg PPA 0.065 · Total 5.719
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0655.71927.2%
Pass-0.584-1.7512.2%
Rush0.0887.47048.3%
1st down0.0612.48329.1%
2nd down-0.029-0.88428.0%
3rd down0.1652.64823.5%
Standard downs0.1368.57528.6%
Passing downs-0.114-2.85624.0%
Stone Saunders · QBUsage 26.3% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 5.810
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1125.81026.3%
Pass0.1266.30164.1%
Rush-0.245-0.4911.7%
1st down-0.211-4.21322.2%
2nd down-0.052-0.98929.7%
3rd down1.28415.40530.0%
Standard downs-0.188-5.83121.8%
Passing downs0.55411.64137.5%
Javion Kinnard · RBUsage 22.4% · Avg PPA 0.219 · Total 22.113
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21922.11322.4%
Pass0.7077.0665.0%
Rush0.16515.04638.1%
1st down-0.025-1.21325.7%
2nd down0.2207.03721.8%
3rd down0.80915.37219.4%
Standard downs0.0825.98824.8%
Passing downs0.57616.12517.9%
Josiah Lucas · RBUsage 21.4% · Avg PPA -0.182 · Total -9.100
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.182-9.10021.4%
Pass-0.387-2.7086.4%
Rush-0.161-6.59535.7%
1st down-0.037-0.88424.7%
2nd down0.000-0.00320.5%
3rd down0.0620.49916.0%
Standard downs-0.291-10.75724.0%
Passing downs0.1271.65716.3%
Draiden Trudeau · QBUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA -0.205 · Total -3.082
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.205-3.0828.6%
Pass-0.188-2.63216.3%
Rush-0.449-0.4491.2%
1st down0.1230.6147.4%
2nd down0.3701.4826.8%
3rd down-1.198-4.7939.8%
Standard downs-0.581-3.4855.6%
Passing downs0.0450.40313.4%
Jaylon Hawkins · WRUsage 7.5% · Avg PPA 0.669 · Total 19.402
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.66919.4027.5%
Pass0.66919.40216.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.92812.0588.0%
2nd down0.3843.8457.9%
3rd down0.5833.4997.0%
Standard downs0.76613.7957.4%
Passing downs0.5105.6067.7%
Nathan Acevedo · WRUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA 0.446 · Total 16.042
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.44616.0427.2%
Pass0.46115.68315.3%
Rush0.1800.3600.7%
1st down0.5508.7957.4%
2nd down-0.027-0.3537.9%
3rd down1.0867.6016.5%
Standard downs0.3236.4646.1%
Passing downs0.5999.5799.1%
Donovan Brown · WRUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.162 · Total 2.590
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1622.5906.6%
Pass0.1622.59015.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.470-1.8793.9%
2nd down0.3681.8386.1%
3rd down0.3762.63214.0%
Standard downs-0.246-1.7254.3%
Passing downs0.4794.31511.1%
Jordan Napier · WRUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.258 · Total 7.491
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2587.4915.8%
Pass0.2576.68411.7%
Rush0.2690.8071.1%
1st down0.0110.1064.7%
2nd down-0.389-3.5005.5%
3rd down1.59314.3338.3%
Standard downs0.1442.5885.5%
Passing downs0.4464.9036.3%
Jacob Bostick · WRUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA 0.232 · Total 4.631
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2324.6315.3%
Pass0.2324.63111.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0250.1724.4%
2nd down1.0944.3743.2%
3rd down0.5204.1609.8%
Standard downs-0.478-4.3033.8%
Passing downs0.8128.9347.7%
Bert Emanuel Jr. · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.195 · Total 3.509
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1953.5094.9%
Pass0.1953.50911.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0700.5615.0%
2nd down0.5984.1835.8%
3rd down-0.411-1.2343.7%
Standard downs-0.085-0.8494.2%
Passing downs0.5454.3596.0%
Jordin Thomas · RBUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.207 · Total 2.690
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2072.6904.3%
Pass0.4060.4060.8%
Rush0.1902.2837.2%
1st down0.1870.9334.0%
2nd down0.1980.7934.0%
3rd down0.2410.9646.2%
Standard downs0.1261.3815.6%
Passing downs0.6551.3091.9%
Jackson Ford · TEUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.332 · Total 2.984
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3322.9843.6%
Pass0.3322.9848.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4702.8205.6%
2nd down0.3910.7812.4%
3rd down-0.617-0.6171.9%
Standard downs0.4503.6014.7%
Passing downs-0.617-0.6171.2%
Justius Lowe · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.289 · Total 2.605
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2892.6053.6%
Pass0.2892.6058.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.1554.6194.0%
2nd down-0.573-1.7183.7%
3rd down-0.148-0.2963.6%
Standard downs0.5413.2483.7%
Passing downs-0.214-0.6433.5%
Christian Washington · RBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA -2.571 · Total -5.142
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-2.571-5.1423.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-2.571-5.1425.0%
1st down-0.614-0.6143.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-4.529-4.5298.3%
Standard downs-2.571-5.1424.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Daishaun Davis · WRUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.745 · Total 3.727
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7453.7272.8%
Pass0.7453.7275.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0470.1424.1%
2nd down-0.130-0.1301.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0470.1422.5%
Passing downs1.7923.5853.3%
Ryan Wolfer · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.344 · Total 2.405
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3442.4052.6%
Pass0.3442.4055.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.666-0.6660.8%
2nd down-0.016-0.0473.4%
3rd down-0.261-0.5213.6%
Standard downs-0.294-0.5881.2%
Passing downs0.5992.9934.9%
Will Cianfrini · WRUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -1.492 · Total -5.967
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.492-5.9672.1%
Pass-1.492-5.9674.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.004-2.0082.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.1390.1392.5%
Standard downs-2.035-6.1062.3%
Passing downs0.1390.1391.6%
Carson Diehl · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA 0.063 · Total 0.126
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0630.1261.8%
Pass0.0630.1264.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.0630.1265.4%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.0630.1266.1%
Kime Fangupo · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -4.943 · Total -4.943
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-4.943-4.9431.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-4.943-4.9432.6%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-4.943-4.9435.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-4.943-4.9435.3%
Jack Lua · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.206 · Total 0.412
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2060.4121.5%
Pass0.2060.4123.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9660.9661.8%
2nd down-0.554-0.5542.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2060.4122.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where San Diego State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.025 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.368 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.212 (40th percentile; 138 teams)40thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: -0.010 (6th percentile; 138 teams)6thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.027 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.151 (23rd percentile; 138 teams)23rdDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.490 (3rd percentile; 138 teams)3rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.086 (95th percentile; 138 teams)95thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.113 (4th percentile; 138 teams)4th
Values and percentiles
San Diego State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0257th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.3687th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.21240th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play-0.0106th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.02712th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.15123rd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.4903rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.08695th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.1134th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 214 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.5 yards (74th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.3 per completion. Completion 57.5%, 6.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.05.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense56.3%60.9%-4.6192 / 214
Defense allowed69.6%60.8%+8.8214 / 271

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is San Diego State.

Target mix by zone, San Diego State offense
Short left38% · 77Short middle15% · 30Short right32% · 65Deep left7% · 15Deep middle2% · 5Deep right6% · 13

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
San Diego State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense214100%9.55.357.5%0.05-4.6 pp192
Passing defense27199%8.66.366.8%0.38+8.8 pp214

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2814.338.5%-0.033.000.901.0019.6%61.1%
Defense allowed3534.051.7%0.093.400.900.408.8%85.1%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense277 / 2812671410110268 / 270 · 99.3%
Defense allowed347 / 3533391416880329 / 329 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -4.6 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-27.3-10.46.5W1W2W2 vs UCLA: -20.9 ppW3W3 vs James Madison: -8.1 ppW4W4 vs Toledo: +6.5 ppW5W5 vs Texas State: -0.3 ppW6W6 vs Oregon State: -27.3 ppW7W7 vs Fresno State: +2.8 ppW8W8 vs Colorado State: +6.3 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Portland State210———9.00.27425.50.18
W2UCLA181833.3%54.3%-20.9 pp16.8-0.56383.7-0.03
W3James Madison333354.5%62.7%-8.1 pp7.7-0.15444.40.06
W4Toledo373764.9%58.3%+6.5 pp9.50.17311.5-0.51
W5Texas State232365.2%65.5%-0.3 pp6.3-0.03284.7-0.12
W6Oregon State272733.3%60.6%-27.3 pp9.4-0.32212.7-0.35
W7Fresno State222263.6%60.8%+2.8 pp10.00.52405.1-0.09
W8Colorado State333268.8%62.5%+6.3 pp9.30.35375.30.35

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

38 punts · 46.1 gross yards/punt · 39.4 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 38/38 punts. Known net yards: 34/38 punts.

Our punt returns

15 returns · 6.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 2 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 15/15 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Colorado State247.538.02/2
Week 7 · Fresno State348.036.01/3
Week 6 · Oregon State745.437.47/7
Week 5 · Texas State644.742.45/6
Week 4 · Toledo642.841.06/6
Team style
Rating history