Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Sam Houston

2026 season

Conference USA
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Sam Houston's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 129 across 8 systems; best 123, worst 132, so they disagree by 9 places.

Lab EPA
#126
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#132
down 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#129
down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#130
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#129
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#131
down 6 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#123
down 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#126
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#135 of 138
Schedule strength
#87 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#128 of 138
Game control
#120 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#119 of 138
Offense
#130 of 138
Defense
#83 of 138
Special teams
#88 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Sam Houston · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

1-6 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.167 net EPA/play

#126

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-12.92 points

#132 · Down 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -9.61 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -4.61, schedule #92 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -1.44. That is worth -14.22 on its own; the preseason prior of -8.92 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -12.92.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Sam Houston · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Troy
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401870763
-3.00 → -3.00+2.500.76379.40%-9.91-0.047-0.932-0.979
Week 2 · Tulsa
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862707
-6.00 → -6.00-2.500.79379.77%-1.22-0.830-0.119-0.949
Week 3 · Nicholls
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401870764
+59.00 → +35.00-2.500.824910.15%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.298-2.5370.761
Week 4 · Texas Tech
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856805
-35.00 → -35.00+2.500.857210.55%+10.71-3.4281.129-2.299
Week 6 · Liberty
away · 2026-10-08 · ID 401870766
-32.00 → -32.00+2.500.925911.39%+6.67-3.3610.760-2.601
Week 7 · Western Kentucky
home · 2026-10-15 · ID 401871068
-13.00 → -13.00-2.500.962211.84%-7.94-1.835-0.941-2.776
Week 8 · New Mexico State
home · 2026-10-22 · ID 401871070
-6.00 → -6.00-2.501.000012.30%-6.78-1.046-0.834-1.880

Game terms -10.72 points; prior term -2.19 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -12.92 points. The preseason prior is -8.92 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-18.0 SP+ points

#129 · Down 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-18.52 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#131 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -15.33 on 340 plays; defense 3.19 on 375 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Sam Houston 6 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
1-7 · conf 0-4 · home 1-3 · away 0-4 · expected wins 2.2
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-5 ATS (+0.9 avg) · 2025: 3-9 ATS (-8.1 avg)
Head coach
Phil Longo · hired 2024-12-18 · 2-10 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #124 (121 pts) · 2025 #122 (108 pts) · 2026 #126 (161 pts)
Returning
58% of production · 52% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-31%38%
Receiving57%66%
Rushing-3%56%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.000.839010.91
Defensive Line63.000.82944.98
Linebacker53.000.82014.10
Offensive Line83.000.82986.64
Quarterback53.000.83464.17
Receiver83.000.82966.64
Running Back33.000.83182.50

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Landyn Locke · QB

CFBD athlete 5148427. Sam Houston (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.21122460.6%
Pass 95.3% · Rush 13.7%

1st 56.3% · 2nd 59.6% · 3rd 68.9%

Standard downs 53.6% · Passing downs 74.0%

2025: 3★ · 0.8639
Alton McCaskill · RB

CFBD athlete 4680018. Arizona State (2024–2024); Colorado (2023–2023); Houston (2021–2022); Sam Houston (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0814614.9%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 28.7%

1st 15.6% · 2nd 15.9% · 3rd 12.8%

Standard downs 17.3% · Passing downs 10.6%

2021: 3★ · 0.8893
Samuel Carpenter · PK

CFBD athlete 5154317. Pittsburgh (2023–2025); Sam Houston (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-0.6308—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Ah'Marion Gaines-Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 5296823. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Aviyon Smith-Mack · WR

CFBD athlete 5159290. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Brett Holloway · QB

CFBD athlete 5384797. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.9%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 9.8%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
Chris Reed · WR

CFBD athlete 4895711. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.8%
Pass 16.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.7% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 12.0%

Standard downs 8.2% · Passing downs 12.8%

Not linked
DJ Bailey · QB

CFBD athlete 5220425. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——39.5%
Pass 55.4% · Rush 10.5%

1st 38.0% · 2nd 41.2% · 3rd 37.0%

Standard downs 37.9% · Passing downs 41.7%

Not linked
Darrick Bledsoe III · WR

CFBD athlete 5220443. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 5.2%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
Grady O'Neill · WR

CFBD athlete 5104888. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.6%
Pass 19.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 9.2% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 17.1%

Standard downs 9.1% · Passing downs 16.2%

Not linked
Jerrian Parker · RB

CFBD athlete 5227793. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 10.7%

1st 10.4% · 2nd 9.9% · 3rd 4.4%

Standard downs 9.1% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Kaden Winkfield · RB

CFBD athlete 5327228. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.6%

1st 11.1% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Kamari Maxwell · WR

CFBD athlete 5301576. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 3.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 1.3%

Not linked
Kyan Berry-Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 5142319. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.5%

1st 5.2% · 2nd 7.5% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Landan Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 5160209. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.0%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 15.8%

1st 11.5% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 11.8% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
London Deyon · TE

CFBD athlete 5207795. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 4.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.4% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
MJ Dowdy · RB

CFBD athlete 5384799. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.7%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 27.5%

1st 13.5% · 2nd 15.6% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 15.5% · Passing downs 8.0%

Not linked
Matt Smith · TE

CFBD athlete 4568237. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 1.8%

Not linked
Max Whisner · TE

CFBD athlete 4695711. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
Tim Burns Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5296832. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.4%
Pass 12.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 9.4% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 7.8%

Standard downs 8.0% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 20 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brian Bates · LBDelaware State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Brock Kuhl · TEFlorida Atlantic2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Brock Stukes · IOLNC State2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Caesar Magee III · CBNorthwestern State2026-01-163★ / 0.8000Immediate
Christian Zachary · WRNC State2026-02-033★ / —Immediate
Denell Nix Jr. · OTApp State2026-02-043★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dimitry Nicolas · DLMaryland2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Elijah Collins · IOLWestern Carolina2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Elijah Groves · LBNC State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ishmel Atkins · CBElon2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jarra Anderson · DLArizona2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jayden Fry · EDGEBoston College2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Josiah Chenault · IOLKennesaw State2026-02-043★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justin Terrell · DLNC State2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kyan Berry-Johnson · WRWisconsin2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Max Whisner · TEAkron2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Sam Carpenter · KPittsburgh2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Stacy Bey · LBArizona2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
William Davis · SWest Virginia2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Zion Taylor · EDGEHouston2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 15 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Curtis Gerrand · PUCLA2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Fatu Mukuba · WRNot reported2025-12-093★ / —Immediate
Hunter Watson · QBNot reported2026-01-082★ / —Immediate
JaMair Diaz · LBTemple2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Jaidan Scott · SNot reported2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Jayveon Johnson · LBNot reported2025-12-143★ / —Immediate
Joe Swen · CBNot reported2026-01-153★ / —TBD
Kevin Kalonji · OTNot reported2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Kolt Dieterich · OTWashington2026-01-054★ / 0.9200Immediate
Lonnie Adkism · WRNot reported2025-12-073★ / —Immediate
Mabrey Mettauer · QBSMU2026-07-243★ / —Immediate
Michael Phoenix II · WRNot reported2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Rayfield Lotten · TENew Mexico State2026-01-213★ / 0.8200Immediate
Rhett Larson · IOLWestern Kentucky2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zeiqui Lawton · DLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Sam Houston. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Phil Longo · career 2–10 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 3 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Phil Longo · active at capture

    2–10 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Brad Cornelsen · interim

    1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-01. Effective dates: 2024-12-20 to unknown.

  3. 2023–2024 · K.C. Keeler

    12–12 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2014-01-23. Effective dates: unknown to 2024-12-20.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Phil Longo · incomplete attribution0–0——-16.9-14.3126—
2025 · Phil Longo2–101–70–0-27.8-22.7122—
2024 · K.C. Keeler9–36–20–0-6.9-6.2124—
2024 · Brad Cornelsen1–00–01–0-6.9-6.2124—
2023 · K.C. Keeler3–92–60–0-13.8-13.396—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:18:12 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play126 / 1388.877 / 13844.5
Success rate127 / 1388.055 / 13860.6
Explosiveness28 / 13880.345 / 13867.9
Standard-down success131 / 1385.158 / 13858.4
Passing-down successT81 / 13841.247 / 13866.4
Pass PPA123 / 13810.919 / 13886.9
Rush PPA128 / 1387.3124 / 13810.2
Pass explosiveness40 / 13871.524 / 13883.2
Rush explosiveness105 / 13824.1110 / 13820.4
Line yards133 / 1383.6110 / 13820.4
Second-level yardsT99 / 13828.1125 / 1389.5
Open-field yards130 / 1385.8124 / 13810.2
Stuff rate134 / 1382.9T81 / 13841.2
Power successT133 / 1382.9T94 / 13831.0
Havoc135 / 1382.2T22 / 13884.3
Front-seven havoc130 / 1385.8T46 / 13865.7
DB havocT118 / 13813.9T17 / 13887.6
Points / opportunity134 / 1382.968 / 13851.1
Average field positionT100 / 13827.4T72 / 13847.1
Field-position expected pointsT92 / 13832.8T89 / 13835.0

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Landyn Locke · QBUsage 60.6% · Avg PPA 0.067 · Total 18.311
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.06718.31160.6%
Pass0.09924.27195.3%
Rush-0.062-1.54613.7%
1st down0.13014.02856.3%
2nd down0.0564.84759.6%
3rd down0.33723.95668.9%
Standard downs-0.036-5.75053.6%
Passing downs0.21124.06174.0%
Alton McCaskill · RBUsage 15.8% · Avg PPA -0.104 · Total -7.395
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.104-7.39515.8%
Pass-0.143-2.4256.6%
Rush-0.092-4.97029.7%
1st down-0.189-6.22617.2%
2nd down-0.027-0.65316.4%
3rd down0.3124.05112.6%
Standard downs-0.095-5.31319.0%
Passing downs-0.139-2.0829.7%
MJ Dowdy · RBUsage 11.7% · Avg PPA -0.127 · Total -3.687
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.127-3.68711.7%
Pass-0.458-0.4580.8%
Rush-0.115-3.22925.2%
1st down-0.235-3.05212.1%
2nd down-0.138-1.52114.1%
3rd down1.3105.2386.9%
Standard downs-0.102-2.25313.8%
Passing downs-0.205-1.4348.0%
Grady O'Neill · WRUsage 10.9% · Avg PPA 0.249 · Total 12.187
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.24912.18710.9%
Pass0.24912.18719.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0560.8477.8%
2nd down-0.102-1.74011.6%
3rd down0.76913.08016.5%
Standard downs-0.129-3.1018.1%
Passing downs0.61115.28716.2%
Landan Brown · RBUsage 10.5% · Avg PPA -0.076 · Total -3.556
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.076-3.55610.5%
Pass-0.208-3.5416.6%
Rush0.000-0.01516.5%
1st down-0.165-4.12513.0%
2nd down0.1392.08610.3%
3rd down-0.217-1.5186.8%
Standard downs-0.211-7.58312.2%
Passing downs0.3664.0277.1%
Jerrian Parker · RBUsage 9.3% · Avg PPA 0.283 · Total 8.489
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2838.4899.3%
Pass0.4957.4238.6%
Rush0.0711.06610.8%
1st down0.68610.29310.9%
2nd down-0.230-2.52610.7%
3rd down0.1800.7225.3%
Standard downs0.2936.1639.6%
Passing downs0.2582.3258.6%
Chris Reed · WRUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA 0.134 · Total 5.242
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1345.2428.7%
Pass0.1345.24215.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0330.4316.8%
2nd down0.7878.6527.5%
3rd down0.6728.06411.7%
Standard downs-0.271-5.6897.1%
Passing downs0.60710.93111.7%
Tim Burns Jr. · WRUsage 7.3% · Avg PPA 0.773 · Total 21.657
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.77321.6577.3%
Pass0.77321.65712.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6069.6979.7%
2nd down0.8194.9144.8%
3rd down1.1747.0476.7%
Standard downs0.4138.6828.4%
Passing downs1.85412.9755.3%
Brett Holloway · QBUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.080 · Total 1.432
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0801.4326.8%
Pass-0.619-3.0933.5%
Rush0.3484.52511.6%
1st down-0.302-1.5084.4%
2nd down-1.623-8.1146.0%
3rd down1.38211.05412.9%
Standard downs0.5437.0647.3%
Passing downs-1.126-5.6325.9%
Kaden Winkfield · RBUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA -0.131 · Total -0.656
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.131-0.6566.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.131-0.65611.6%
1st down-0.047-0.18911.1%
2nd down-0.467-0.4674.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.131-0.6568.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Kyan Berry-Johnson · WRUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.423 · Total 11.002
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.42311.0025.8%
Pass0.43610.8939.7%
Rush0.1090.1090.5%
1st down0.3803.8005.2%
2nd down0.1701.8677.5%
3rd down1.0675.3344.9%
Standard downs0.8679.5333.7%
Passing downs0.0981.4699.7%
DJ Bailey · QBUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA -0.732 · Total -2.196
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.732-2.1965.6%
Pass-0.732-2.1968.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.041-1.0414.2%
2nd down-0.631-0.6316.3%
3rd down-0.524-0.5247.7%
Standard downs-1.041-1.0413.2%
Passing downs-0.577-1.1558.7%
Darrick Bledsoe III · WRUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.621 · Total 8.075
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6218.0754.6%
Pass0.6218.0758.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8515.9595.8%
2nd down-0.532-1.0642.2%
3rd down0.7953.1806.3%
Standard downs0.8515.9593.6%
Passing downs0.3532.1167.1%
Ah'Marion Gaines-Smith · RBUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.888 · Total 2.665
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8882.6653.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.8882.6657.0%
1st down0.0870.0872.8%
2nd down2.0142.0144.2%
3rd down0.5640.5645.6%
Standard downs0.3250.6513.4%
Passing downs2.0142.0145.3%
Max Whisner · TEUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.304 · Total 2.126
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3042.1263.3%
Pass0.3042.1265.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0920.1842.1%
2nd down0.3881.9427.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0190.0963.3%
Passing downs1.0152.0303.2%
London Deyon · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.125 · Total -0.624
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.125-0.6242.9%
Pass-0.125-0.6244.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.519-1.0382.7%
2nd down0.1380.4145.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.519-1.0381.9%
Passing downs0.1380.4144.3%
Matt Smith · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.053 · Total -0.374
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.053-0.3742.3%
Pass-0.053-0.3743.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.099-0.3973.1%
2nd down0.0080.0233.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.068-0.3402.6%
Passing downs-0.017-0.0341.8%
Kamari Maxwell · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.330 · Total 3.300
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3303.3002.2%
Pass0.3303.3003.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.9337.7302.1%
2nd down-0.318-0.9542.1%
3rd down0.1500.3001.9%
Standard downs0.8827.0592.7%
Passing downs-1.880-3.7591.3%
Aviyon Smith-Mack · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.405 · Total -0.405
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.405-0.4051.3%
Pass-0.405-0.4053.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.405-0.4054.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.405-0.4055.3%
Where Sam Houston sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.018 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.374 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.308 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.036 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.065 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.078 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.397 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61stDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.177 (68th percentile; 138 teams)68thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.185 (84th percentile; 138 teams)84th
Values and percentiles
Sam Houston metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0189th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.3748th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.30880th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.03611th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.0657th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.07845th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.39761st138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.17768th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.18584th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 279 attempts charted. Average depth of target 7.8 yards (21st percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.5 per completion. Completion 60.9%, 7.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.12.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense60.2%64.1%-3.9244 / 279
Defense allowed55.9%60.7%-4.8177 / 203

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Sam Houston.

Target mix by zone, Sam Houston offense
Short left28% · 76Short middle27% · 72Short right34% · 92Deep left3% · 7Deep middle3% · 7Deep right5% · 14

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Sam Houston passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense27999%7.85.560.9%0.12-3.9 pp244
Passing defense20399%8.66.053.7%0.07-4.8 pp177

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2223.039.7%-0.032.700.900.6020.6%62.5%
Defense allowed3164.845.1%0.193.101.201.5017.3%73.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense215 / 2222111119441198 / 199 · 99.5%
Defense allowed312 / 3163061015660294 / 295 · 99.7%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.9 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-16.8-7.42.1W1W1 vs Troy: +1.1 ppW2W2 vs Tulsa: +2.1 ppW3W4W4 vs Texas Tech: -3.8 ppW6W6 vs Liberty: -1.4 ppW7W7 vs Western Kentucky: -16.8 ppW8W8 vs New Mexico State: -11.7 ppW9W9 vs Missouri State: -0.4 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Troy464665.2%64.1%+1.1 pp7.80.34222.8-0.33
W2Tulsa353470.6%68.5%+2.1 pp3.90.52301.80.08
W3Nicholls320———10.20.85435.50.38
W4Texas Tech383762.2%65.9%-3.8 pp6.9-0.48272.70.03
W6Liberty303066.7%68.0%-1.4 pp5.4-0.22293.6-0.15
W7Western Kentucky303043.3%60.2%-16.8 pp10.6-0.27272.3-0.16
W8New Mexico State333253.1%64.8%-11.7 pp5.8-0.05201.8-0.47
W9Missouri State353557.1%57.6%-0.4 pp11.70.20241.6-0.10

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

50 punts · 44.8 gross yards/punt · 37.7 net yards/punt

12 inside the 20 · 6 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 50/50 punts. Known net yards: 42/50 punts.

Our punt returns

15 returns · 4.9 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 15/15 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Missouri State550.235.34/5
Week 8 · New Mexico State842.936.86/8
Week 7 · Western Kentucky845.037.77/8
Week 6 · Liberty544.441.45/5
Week 4 · Texas Tech946.630.17/9
Team style
Rating history