Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Rice

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Rice's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 117 across 8 systems; best 111, worst 128, so they disagree by 17 places.

Lab EPA
#114
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#120
up 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#122
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#128
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#122
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#113
up 9 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#111
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#114
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#132 of 138
Schedule strength
#65 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#83 of 138
Game control
#123 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#122 of 138
Offense
#104 of 138
Defense
#113 of 138
Special teams
#125 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Rice · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

1-7 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.105 net EPA/play

#114

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-9.25 points

#120 · Up 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -8.92 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -0.92, schedule #52 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +2.02. That is worth -9.84 on its own; the preseason prior of -7.17 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -9.25.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Rice · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Houston Christian
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401862697
+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.76378.47%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.159-2.1170.042
Week 2 · Notre Dame
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401859184
-52.00 → -35.00+2.500.79378.80%+19.89-2.8601.751-1.109
Week 3 · Western Michigan
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401862773
-7.00 → -7.00-2.500.82499.15%+0.84-0.8690.077-0.792
Week 4 · Fresno State
away · 2026-09-27 · ID 401860891
-14.00 → -14.00+2.500.85729.51%+0.87-1.0930.083-1.011
Week 5 · UTSA
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862788
-2.00 → -2.00-2.500.89099.88%+3.69-0.4450.364-0.080
Week 6 · East Carolina
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401862797
-16.00 → -16.00+2.500.925910.27%-1.32-1.386-0.136-1.522
Week 7 · Tulsa
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862805
-21.00 → -21.00-2.500.962210.67%-1.22-2.507-0.130-2.638
Week 8 · Florida Atlantic
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401862809
-2.00 → -2.00+2.501.000011.09%-5.460.055-0.606-0.550

Game terms -7.66 points; prior term -1.59 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -9.25 points. The preseason prior is -7.17 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-14.2 SP+ points

#122 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-11.91 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#113 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -7.34 on 392 plays; defense 4.57 on 447 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Rice 6 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
1-7 · conf 0-4 · home 1-3 · away 0-4 · expected wins 2.4
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (-0.9 avg) · 2025: 5-8 ATS (-6.2 avg)
Head coach
Scott Abell · hired 2024-11-26 · 5-8 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #122 (122 pts) · 2025 #100 (147 pts) · 2026 #104 (176 pts)
Returning
39% of production · 32% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-317%15%
Receiving54%14%
Rushing77%45%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back93.000.83707.53
Defensive Line123.000.838310.06
Linebacker63.000.84975.10
Offensive Line173.000.832114.14
Quarterback43.000.84543.38
Receiver133.000.832510.82
Running Back93.000.83907.55
Special Teams63.000.83154.99

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Jacurri Brown · QB

CFBD athlete 4685291. Rice (2026–2026); UCF (2024–2025); Miami (2022–2023)

Rushing WEPA0.36610444.4%
Pass 86.4% · Rush 32.8%

1st 38.1% · 2nd 46.1% · 3rd 46.7%

Standard downs 38.2% · Passing downs 57.7%

Not linked
Jacurri Brown · QB

CFBD athlete 4685291. Rice (2026–2026); UCF (2024–2025); Miami (2022–2023)

Passing WEPA0.0968644.4%
Pass 86.4% · Rush 32.8%

1st 38.1% · 2nd 46.1% · 3rd 46.7%

Standard downs 38.2% · Passing downs 57.7%

Not linked
Tyvonn Byars · RB

CFBD athlete 5207925. Rice (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0978118.9%
Pass 0.9% · Rush 24.9%

1st 23.9% · 2nd 16.3% · 3rd 16.7%

Standard downs 22.1% · Passing downs 11.9%

2025: 3★ · 0.8647
DAndre Hardeman Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5207930. Rice (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0046417.0%
Pass 1.1% · Rush 22.2%

1st 18.6% · 2nd 16.2% · 3rd 17.2%

Standard downs 20.5% · Passing downs 9.0%

Not linked
Enock Gota · PK

CFBD athlete 5082275. Rice (2022–2026)

Kicker PAAR-5.9906—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Tommy Bauchiero · PK

CFBD athlete 5296697. Rice (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-0.1505—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2026: 3★ · 0.8211
Barry Jackson Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 4923288. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 16.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 8.1%

Not linked
Ben Grice · WR

CFBD athlete 5144288. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 13.0% · Rush 4.7%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 7.6% · 3rd 4.6%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 7.5%

Not linked
Braylen Walker · WR

CFBD athlete 4869581. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 13.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Carson Morgan · RB

CFBD athlete 5151063. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 10.1%

1st 11.7% · 2nd 7.8% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 11.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Chris Bruce · WR

CFBD athlete 5151280. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 1.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Colin Leahey · WR

CFBD athlete 5265453. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 14.3%

1st 11.5% · 2nd 12.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 14.6% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Davis Lane · WR

CFBD athlete 4868249. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 10.7% · Rush 2.3%

1st 1.1% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 5.1%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Gael Ochoa · QB

CFBD athlete 5145788. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.0%
Pass 45.5% · Rush 9.5%

1st 15.0% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 24.1%

Standard downs 13.3% · Passing downs 18.6%

Not linked
Jordan Clark · WR

CFBD athlete 5265445. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.5%
Pass 27.0% · Rush 2.1%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 8.1% · 3rd 8.8%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 10.1%

Not linked
Justin Powell · RB

CFBD athlete 5384739. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.9%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Max Mosey · WR

CFBD athlete 5087069. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 8.1% · Rush 5.0%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Patrick Crayton Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5265447. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 11.1% · Rush 3.3%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 6.4% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Payton Matthews · WR

CFBD athlete 5236325. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 13.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 1.2% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Preston Zinter · TE

CFBD athlete 4871093. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 11.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Quinton Jackson · RB

CFBD athlete 5082271. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.4%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 14.3%

1st 11.8% · 2nd 14.8% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 11.3% · Passing downs 20.0%

Not linked
Will Swartz · TE

CFBD athlete 5258483. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 11.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 20 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
AJ Brown · SUAB2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Austin Harnetiaux · LBNevada2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Barry Jackson Jr. · WRCincinnati2026-01-223★ / 0.8300Immediate
Ben Grice · WRWake Forest2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Caden VerMaas · SNebraska2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Charlie Durkin · PKent State2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Davis Lane Jr. · WRVirginia2026-01-193★ / 0.8300Immediate
Gael Ochoa · QBUNLV2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Jacurri Brown · QBUCF2026-01-064★ / —Immediate
Jamir Benjamin · CBUCLA2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jesus Machado · LBHouston2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Koa Akui · SSacramento State2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kyren Condoll · CBDuke2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Leo Bluhm · IOLYale2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Max Mosey · WRHoly Cross2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Phoenix Derichsweiler · LSTulane2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Preston Zinter · EDGENotre Dame2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Scott Becker · IOLPrinceton2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Tariq May · EDGEEastern Washington2026-01-123★ / 0.8200Immediate
Zach Cody · CBCoastal Carolina2026-01-053★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 22 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex Bacchetta · PGeorgia Tech2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Alex Scherle · TEBall State2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Artis Cole · WRNot reported2026-01-142★ / —Immediate
Brad Baur · OTNot reported2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Braylen Walker · WRNot reported2026-01-042★ / —Immediate
Chase Jenkins · QBKansas2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Daelen Alexander · RBCoastal Carolina2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
DeMone Green · DLLamar2026-01-233★ / —Immediate
Drayden Dickmann · WRWake Forest2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Drew Devillier · QBFlorida Atlantic2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Ephraim Dotson · CBLamar2026-01-223★ / —Immediate
Jamarion Clark · CBNot reported2025-12-023★ / —Immediate
John Long · IOLNot reported2025-12-093★ / —Immediate
LaVonte Johnson · SNot reported2025-12-253★ / —Immediate
Landon Ransom-Goelz · WRMontana2026-01-243★ / —Immediate
Marcus Williams · SMississippi State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Moh Bility · CBNot reported2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Patrick Valent · IOLNot reported2026-01-032★ / —Immediate
Plae Wyatt · SAbilene Christian2026-01-153★ / —Immediate
Semaj Pierre · WRHoward2026-02-053★ / —Immediate
Shepherd Bowling · LBNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Ty Morris · LBRutgers2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Rice. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Scott Abell · career 5–8 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 22 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Scott Abell · active at capture

    5–8 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-11-26. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Pete Alamar · interim

    2–2 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2024-10-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2024 · Mike Bloomgren

    24–52 · 76 attributed games · 7 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2007–2017 · David Bailiff

    57–80 · 137 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Hired 2007-01-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2006–2006 · Todd Graham

    7–6 · 13 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2006-01-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1994–2005 · Ken Hatfield

    55–78–1 · 134 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1989–1993 · Fred Goldsmith

    23–31–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1986–1988 · Jerry Berndt

    6–27 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1984–1985 · Watson Brown

    4–18 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1978–1983 · Ray Alborn

    13–53 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1976–1977 · Homer Rice

    4–18 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1972–1975 · Al Conover

    14–28–2 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1971–1971 · Bill Peterson

    3–7–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1967–1970 · Bo Hagan

    12–27–1 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1940–1966 · Jess Neely

    144–124–10 · 278 attributed games · 27 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1934–1939 · Jimmy Kitts

    33–29–4 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1929–1933 · Jack Meagher

    26–26 · 52 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1928–1928 · Claude Rothgeb

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1924–1927 · John Heisman

    14–18–3 · 35 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1919–1923 · Phillip Arbuckle

    23–16–3 · 42 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1918–1918 · John Anderson

    1–5–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1914–1917 · Phillip Arbuckle

    21–7–5 · 33 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Scott Abell · incomplete attribution0–0——-14.2-11.5104—
2025 · Scott Abell5–82–60–1-14.8-15.1100—
2024 · Mike Bloomgren · incomplete attribution2–6——-11.4-8.6122—
2024 · Pete Alamar · incomplete attribution2–2——-11.4-8.6122—
2023 · Mike Bloomgren6–74–40–1-10.2-4.386—
2022 · Mike Bloomgren5–83–50–1-15.2-12.1119—
2021 · Mike Bloomgren4–83–50–0-22.9-15.693—
2020 · Mike Bloomgren2–32–30–0-9.2-393—
2019 · Mike Bloomgren3–93–50–0-18-13.5111—
2018 · Mike Bloomgren2–111–70–0-26.4-24112—
2017 · David Bailiff1–111–70–0-23.6-24.4122—
2016 · David Bailiff3–92–60–0-16.5-20.6129—
2015 · David Bailiff5–73–50–0-14.6-18101—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:27:27 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play114 / 13817.599 / 13828.5
Success rate96 / 13830.792 / 13833.6
Explosiveness82 / 13840.9109 / 13821.2
Standard-down success63 / 13854.797 / 13829.9
Passing-down success134 / 1382.996 / 13830.7
Pass PPA138 / 1380.084 / 13839.4
Rush PPA61 / 13856.297 / 13829.9
Pass explosiveness10 / 13893.456 / 13859.9
Rush explosiveness18 / 13887.6127 / 1388.0
Line yards81 / 13841.639 / 13872.3
Second-level yards83 / 13840.191 / 13834.3
Open-field yards5 / 13897.1110 / 13820.4
Stuff rate85 / 13838.740 / 13871.5
Power successT20 / 13885.8T40 / 13869.7
HavocT83 / 13838.7T53 / 13860.9
Front-seven havoc134 / 1382.9T23 / 13883.6
DB havoc4 / 13897.8T122 / 13810.6
Points / opportunity116 / 13816.1102 / 13826.3
Average field positionT137 / 1380.4136 / 1381.5
Field-position expected points137 / 1380.7136 / 1381.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Jacurri Brown · QBUsage 44.4% · Avg PPA 0.018 · Total 3.653
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0183.65344.4%
Pass-0.216-19.24286.4%
Rush0.21022.89432.8%
1st down-0.016-1.12938.1%
2nd down0.22215.51046.1%
3rd down-0.267-11.49346.7%
Standard downs0.0445.15938.2%
Passing downs-0.018-1.50657.7%
Tyvonn Byars · RBUsage 18.9% · Avg PPA 0.022 · Total 2.117
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0222.11718.9%
Pass-4.166-4.1660.9%
Rush0.0666.28424.9%
1st down0.0110.56823.9%
2nd down-0.169-4.74116.3%
3rd down0.61510.45716.7%
Standard downs0.0765.88022.1%
Passing downs-0.198-3.76311.9%
DAndre Hardeman Jr. · RBUsage 17.0% · Avg PPA -0.116 · Total -8.720
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.116-8.72017.0%
Pass-0.226-0.2261.1%
Rush-0.115-8.49322.2%
1st down-0.271-9.21918.6%
2nd down0.0691.65616.2%
3rd down0.0721.08617.2%
Standard downs-0.095-6.01420.5%
Passing downs-0.225-2.7069.0%
Gael Ochoa · QBUsage 15.0% · Avg PPA 0.324 · Total 13.304
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.32413.30415.0%
Pass-0.049-0.98745.5%
Rush0.68114.2919.5%
1st down0.3566.05215.0%
2nd down1.57415.73910.6%
3rd down-0.333-4.32724.1%
Standard downs0.45011.25313.3%
Passing downs0.1282.05118.6%
Quinton Jackson · RBUsage 13.4% · Avg PPA 0.317 · Total 3.490
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3173.49013.4%
Pass0.2100.21010.0%
Rush0.3283.28114.3%
1st down0.2240.89711.8%
2nd down0.8253.30114.8%
3rd down1.5743.14811.8%
Standard downs-0.378-2.64511.3%
Passing downs1.5346.13620.0%
Colin Leahey · WRUsage 10.4% · Avg PPA 0.086 · Total 0.605
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0860.60510.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.0860.60514.3%
1st down-0.231-0.69411.5%
2nd down-0.009-0.02812.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1660.99814.6%
Passing downs-0.392-0.3923.8%
Carson Morgan · RBUsage 8.1% · Avg PPA -0.063 · Total -0.759
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.063-0.7598.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.063-0.75910.1%
1st down-0.117-0.81911.7%
2nd down0.1780.7117.8%
3rd down-0.651-0.6513.1%
Standard downs-0.063-0.75911.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jordan Clark · WRUsage 7.5% · Avg PPA 0.228 · Total 8.681
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2288.6817.5%
Pass0.2337.00527.0%
Rush0.2101.6762.1%
1st down0.1721.8955.3%
2nd down0.3605.0368.1%
3rd down0.5645.0768.8%
Standard downs-0.076-1.6836.3%
Passing downs0.64810.36410.1%
Ben Grice · WRUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.364 · Total 7.642
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3647.6426.6%
Pass0.2352.34713.0%
Rush0.4815.2954.7%
1st down0.6846.8407.7%
2nd down0.3052.4417.6%
3rd down-0.546-1.6384.6%
Standard downs0.3404.7546.3%
Passing downs0.4132.8887.5%
Max Mosey · WRUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.374 · Total 10.472
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.37410.4725.5%
Pass-0.131-1.1838.1%
Rush0.61311.6565.0%
1st down0.6866.8594.8%
2nd down0.0390.3485.2%
3rd down0.6254.3786.9%
Standard downs0.76111.4124.3%
Passing downs-0.072-0.9408.2%
Barry Jackson Jr. · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.224 · Total 3.134
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2243.1344.7%
Pass0.2243.13416.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3081.2333.3%
2nd down0.1040.5194.9%
3rd down0.2050.6154.8%
Standard downs0.1961.1793.0%
Passing downs0.2441.9568.1%
Patrick Crayton Jr. · QBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.792 · Total 4.750
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7924.7504.2%
Pass0.9521.90511.1%
Rush0.7112.8463.3%
1st down-0.134-0.4014.8%
2nd down1.7175.1516.4%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5462.7314.7%
Passing downs2.0192.0192.7%
Davis Lane · WRUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.141 · Total 0.990
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1410.9903.4%
Pass0.5761.72810.7%
Rush-0.184-0.7382.3%
1st down0.8400.8401.1%
2nd down-0.267-0.8024.3%
3rd down-0.751-1.5035.1%
Standard downs-0.303-1.2112.7%
Passing downs0.7342.2015.0%
Braylen Walker · WRUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.008 · Total 0.116
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0080.1163.1%
Pass0.0080.11613.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.582-2.9082.7%
2nd down0.7703.8503.4%
3rd down0.7191.4382.2%
Standard downs0.4523.6202.6%
Passing downs-0.584-3.5044.4%
Payton Matthews · WRUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA -0.013 · Total -0.093
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.013-0.0932.8%
Pass-0.013-0.09313.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.437-1.7483.8%
2nd down1.9881.9881.2%
3rd down-0.167-0.3343.8%
Standard downs-0.437-1.7482.3%
Passing downs0.5521.6553.8%
Justin Powell · RBUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA -0.746 · Total -1.492
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.746-1.4922.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.746-1.4922.9%
1st down-0.686-0.6862.9%
2nd down-0.806-0.8063.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.686-0.6861.6%
Passing downs-0.806-0.8065.0%
Will Swartz · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.403 · Total -1.209
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.403-1.2092.1%
Pass-0.403-1.20911.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.350-0.7003.6%
2nd down-0.508-0.5082.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.350-0.7002.0%
Passing downs-0.508-0.5082.4%
Chris Bruce · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.113 · Total 2.226
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.1132.2261.6%
Pass2.7972.7974.3%
Rush-0.571-0.5711.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.1132.2266.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.1132.2264.9%
Preston Zinter · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.793 · Total -1.586
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.793-1.5861.6%
Pass-0.793-1.58611.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.388-0.3881.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-1.198-1.1984.5%
Standard downs-0.793-1.5862.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Rice sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.031 (17th percentile; 138 teams)17thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.407 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.213 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: -0.165 (0th percentile; 138 teams)0thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.124 (56th percentile; 138 teams)56thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.143 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.425 (33rd percentile; 138 teams)33rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.305 (21st percentile; 138 teams)21stDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.166 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61st
Values and percentiles
Rice metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.03117th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40731st138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.21341st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play-0.1650th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.12456th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.14328th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42533rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.30521st138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16661st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 100 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.8 yards (91st percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.9 per completion. Completion 49.0%, 6.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA -0.00.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense50.0%57.3%-7.390 / 100
Defense allowed70.3%61.5%+8.8212 / 238

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Rice.

Target mix by zone, Rice offense
Short left36% · 35Short middle17% · 17Short right27% · 26Deep left6% · 6Deep middle11% · 11Deep right3% · 3

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Rice passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense100100%10.84.949.0%-0.00-7.3 pp90
Passing defense23899%8.55.266.4%0.27+8.8 pp212

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3955.545.1%0.173.101.102.1017.4%83.3%
Defense allowed3074.644.4%0.163.001.101.5017.6%66.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense390 / 395388714020377 / 379 · 99.5%
Defense allowed303 / 30729116129111283 / 284 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -7.3 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-32.1-13.84.5W1W2W2 vs Notre Dame: +4.5 ppW3W3 vs Western Michigan: +3.7 ppW4W4 vs Fresno State: -13.0 ppW5W5 vs UTSA: -9.0 ppW6W6 vs East Carolina: -32.1 ppW7W7 vs Tulsa: -1.1 ppW8W8 vs Florida Atlantic: +3.7 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Houston Christian100———6.7-0.20706.60.34
W2Notre Dame121266.7%62.1%+4.5 pp9.10.26332.0-0.39
W3Western Michigan181861.1%57.5%+3.7 pp10.40.14444.80.11
W4Fresno State171747.1%60.0%-13.0 pp10.1-0.20467.60.51
W5UTSA141442.9%51.9%-9.0 pp15.00.21463.0-0.20
W6East Carolina141428.6%60.7%-32.1 pp7.9-0.59513.2-0.11
W7Tulsa8850.0%51.1%-1.1 pp16.3-0.31545.40.29
W8Florida Atlantic7757.1%53.5%+3.7 pp13.41.00519.80.47

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

31 punts · 46.8 gross yards/punt · 35.1 net yards/punt

2 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 31/31 punts. Known net yards: 22/31 punts.

Our punt returns

2 returns · 17.5 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 2/2 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Florida Atlantic358.73.02/3
Week 7 · Tulsa247.042.01/2
Week 6 · East Carolina841.538.03/8
Week 5 · UTSA454.038.33/4
Week 4 · Fresno State242.037.01/2
Team style
Rating history