Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Oregon

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Oregon's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 21.5 across 8 systems; best 11, worst 41, so they disagree by 30 places.

Lab EPA
#38
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#23
down 42026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#12
down 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#17
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#11
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#41
up 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#20
down 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#38
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#31 of 138
Schedule strength
#18 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#27 of 138
Game control
#39 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#22 of 138
Offense
#78 of 138
Defense
#8 of 138
Special teams
#11 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Oregon · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.075 net EPA/play

#38

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

8.55 points

#23 · Down 4 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +4.54 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +3.77, schedule #9 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +8.25. That is worth +8.31 on its own; the preseason prior of +9.27 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +8.55.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Oregon · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Boise State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858433		+7.00 → +7.00-2.500.76379.40%+8.470.4230.7961.218
Week 2 · Oklahoma State
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856782		-8.00 → -8.00+2.500.79379.77%+7.38-0.5370.7210.184
Week 3 · Portland State
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858455		+84.00 → +35.00-2.500.824910.15%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.298-2.5370.761
Week 4 · USC
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858469		+14.00 → +14.00+2.500.857210.55%+7.221.7400.7612.501
Week 6 · UCLA
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858484		-2.00 → -2.00-2.500.925911.39%+12.00-0.5131.3670.854
Week 7 · Nebraska
home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401858492		+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.962211.84%+10.820.0591.2811.340
Week 8 · Illinois
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858495		-11.00 → -11.00+2.501.000012.30%+3.72-1.0460.458-0.588

Game terms +6.27 points; prior term +2.28 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +8.55 points. The preseason prior is +9.27 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

17.0 SP+ points

#12 · Down 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

7.06 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#41 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -9.42 on 399 plays; defense -16.47 on 417 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Oregon 15 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 1-2 · expected wins 4.4
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-5 ATS (-7.4 avg) · 2025: 8-7 ATS (+3.2 avg)
Head coach
Dan Lanning · hired 2021-12-11 · 38-5 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #3 (293 pts) · 2025 #5 (296 pts) · 2026 #3 (303 pts)
Returning
75% of production · 67% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing95%98%
Receiving64%53%
Rushing68%49%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back204.000.938718.77
Defensive Line233.780.917321.10
Linebacker83.880.91397.31
Offensive Line153.730.911913.68
Quarterback63.670.91275.48
Receiver193.840.917917.44
Running Back83.750.90907.27
Special Teams103.100.84548.45

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Dylan Raiola · QB

CFBD athlete 5079572. Nebraska (2024–2025); Oregon (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.28510432.2%
Pass 58.9% · Rush 4.5%

1st 28.1% · 2nd 32.0% · 3rd 43.1%

Standard downs 28.3% · Passing downs 41.2%

2024: 5★ · 0.9926
Dante Moore · QB

CFBD athlete 4870921. UCLA (2023–2023); Oregon (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.3098637.4%
Pass 69.1% · Rush 2.3%

1st 30.1% · 2nd 36.6% · 3rd 52.8%

Standard downs 29.9% · Passing downs 55.3%

2023: 5★ · 0.9977
Jordon Davison · RB

CFBD athlete 5141423. Oregon (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2247918.7%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 38.2%

1st 19.4% · 2nd 19.9% · 3rd 14.1%

Standard downs 21.2% · Passing downs 13.2%

2025: 4★ · 0.9299
Dierre Hill Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5141499. Oregon (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1277820.4%
Pass 9.1% · Rush 34.2%

1st 23.0% · 2nd 24.7% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 24.1% · Passing downs 12.6%

2025: 4★ · 0.9356
Gage Hurych · PK

CFBD athlete 5192414. Oregon (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.79013—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 3★ · 0.8150
A.J. Pugliano · TE

CFBD athlete 5079634. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.1%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Akili Smith Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5141659. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 8.9% · Rush 2.1%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Andrew Olesh · TE

CFBD athlete 5201878. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 10.3%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
Brady Bidwell · WR

CFBD athlete 5221319. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 10.5%

Not linked
Brandon Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 5198506. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.9%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 20.7%

1st 10.8% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 12.8%

Standard downs 11.9% · Passing downs 8.5%

Not linked
Brock Thomas · QB

CFBD athlete 5158446. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——19.2%
Pass 34.5% · Rush 4.4%

1st 15.0% · 2nd 18.4% · 3rd 29.5%

Standard downs 14.7% · Passing downs 29.6%

Not linked
Da'Jaun Riggs · RB

CFBD athlete 5146711. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.7%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 13.3%

1st 9.5% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 9.0% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Dakorien Moore · WR

CFBD athlete 5141586. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.9%
Pass 22.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 14.4% · 2nd 9.0% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 12.2% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Evan Stewart · WR

CFBD athlete 4685565. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.8%
Pass 19.0% · Rush 1.9%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 16.7%

Standard downs 8.6% · Passing downs 15.9%

Not linked
Gatlin Bair · WR

CFBD athlete 5327431. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 2.1%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Hudson Lewis · WR

CFBD athlete 5282366. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 11.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.5% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 4.7%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked
Iverson Hooks · WR

CFBD athlete 4912286. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 4.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Jalen Lott · WR

CFBD athlete 5158995. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 8.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Jamari Johnson · TE

CFBD athlete 4922988. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.2%
Pass 17.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 14.0%

Not linked
Jeremiah McClellan · WR

CFBD athlete 5079519. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 16.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.8% · 2nd 9.8% · 3rd 14.8%

Standard downs 7.5% · Passing downs 13.3%

Not linked
Kendre Harrison · TE

CFBD athlete 5159026. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Messiah Hampton · WR

CFBD athlete 5211889. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.4%
Pass 14.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 5.1% · 3rd 11.3%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 8.5%

Not linked
Nathan McCoy II · WR

CFBD athlete 5296018. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Tradarian Ball · RB

CFBD athlete 5158939. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.5%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 14.6%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 13.8% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 7.9% · Passing downs 15.8%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 13 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aaron Scott Jr. · CBOhio State2026-01-173★ / 0.8800Immediate
Andrew Olesh · TEPenn State2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Bleu Dantzler · EDGEOregon State2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carl Williams IV · SBaylor2026-01-123★ / 0.8700Immediate
D'Antre Robinson · DLNorth Carolina2026-01-124★ / 0.9300Immediate
Dylan Raiola · QBNebraska2026-01-124★ / 0.9400Immediate
Iverson Hooks · WRUAB2026-01-123★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jerome Simmons · DLUL Monroe2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Keaton Emmett · KNevada2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Koi Perich · SMinnesota2026-01-134★ / 0.9500Immediate
Markus Dixon · EDGEClemson2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Michael Bennett III · OTYale2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Simeon Price · RBColorado2026-01-143★ / 0.8800Immediate
Outgoing · 31 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ashton Porter · DLHouston2026-01-163★ / 0.8800Immediate
Austin Novosad · QBBowling Green2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Blake Purchase · EDGEOle Miss2026-01-164★ / 0.9300Immediate
Bryson Beaver · QBGeorgia2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Cooper Perry · WRCalifornia2026-01-183★ / 0.8700Immediate
Dakoda Fields · CBOklahoma2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Darrian Anderson · WRFresno State2026-02-043★ / 0.8200Immediate
Daylen Austin · SArizona2026-01-163★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jahlil Florence · CBMissouri2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jay Harris · RBKansas State2026-01-123★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jayden Limar · RBWashington2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jericho Johnson · DLCalifornia2026-01-194★ / 0.9000Immediate
Justius Lowe · WRSan Diego State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kade Caton · TESouth Florida2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kamar Mothudi · LBCalifornia2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kingston Lopa · SCalifornia2026-01-054★ / 0.9000Immediate
Kyler Kasper · WRBYU2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lipe Moala · IOLHawai'i2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Luke Moga · QBNew Mexico2026-01-233★ / 0.8500Immediate
Makhi Hughes · RBHouston2026-01-043★ / 0.8800Immediate
Mark Wiepert · QBUTSA2026-07-073★ / —Immediate
Nick Duzansky · LSMichigan State2026-01-18— / —Immediate
Roger Saleapaga II · TEBYU2026-01-174★ / 0.9100Immediate
Sione Laulea · CBMissouri2026-01-143★ / 0.8800Immediate
Solomon Davis · SSan Diego State2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Terrance Green · DLAlabama2026-01-134★ / 0.9300Immediate
Tionne Gray · DLNotre Dame2026-01-154★ / 0.9400Immediate
Tobi Haastrup · EDGEWest Virginia2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Vander Ploog · TENC State2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Xadavien Sims · DLArkansas2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Zach Grace · TELSU2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Oregon. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Dan Lanning · career 48–8 across 5 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 23 appointments

  1. 2022–present · Dan Lanning · active at capture

    48–8 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2021-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2021 · Bryan McClendon

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2021 · Mario Cristobal

    35–12 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2017–2017 · Willie Taggart

    7–6 · 13 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2016-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2013–2016 · Mark Helfrich

    37–16 · 53 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2013-01-20. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2009–2012 · Chip Kelly

    46–7 · 53 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2009-03-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1995–2008 · Mike Bellotti

    116–55 · 171 attributed games · 14 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1977–1994 · Rich Brooks

    91–109–4 · 204 attributed games · 18 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1974–1976 · Don Read

    9–24 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1972–1973 · Dick Enright

    6–16 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1967–1971 · Jerry Frei

    22–29–2 · 53 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1951–1966 · Len Casanova

    82–73–8 · 163 attributed games · 16 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1947–1950 · Jim Aiken

    21–20 · 41 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1945–1946 · Tex Oliver

    7–10–1 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1942–1942 · John Warren

    2–6 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1938–1941 · Tex Oliver

    16–18–2 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1932–1937 · Prink Callison

    33–23–2 · 58 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1930–1931 · Clarence Spears

    13–4–2 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1926–1929 · John McEwan

    20–13–2 · 35 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1925–1925 · Richard Smith

    1–5–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1924–1924 · Joseph Maddock

    4–2–3 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1918–1923 · Shy Huntington

    26–12–6 · 44 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1916–1917 · Hugo Bezdek

    11–3–1 · 15 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Dan Lanning · incomplete attribution0–0——18.8143—
2025 · Dan Lanning13–28–12–125.922.154
2024 · Dan Lanning13–110–00–12617.133
2023 · Dan Lanning12–28–21–026.222.396
2022 · Dan Lanning10–37–21–018.914.21315
2021 · Mario Cristobal · incomplete attribution10–3——10.29.9622
2021 · Bryan McClendon · incomplete attribution0–1——10.29.9622
2020 · Mario Cristobal4–34–20–118.1—12—
2019 · Mario Cristobal12–29–11–0192175
2018 · Mario Cristobal9–45–41–07.35.213—
2017 · Willie Taggart7–64–50–19.14.619—
2016 · Mark Helfrich4–82–70–06.12.227—
2015 · Mark Helfrich9–47–20–115.912.31619
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:18:24 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play70 / 13849.620 / 13886.1
Success rate67 / 13851.819 / 13886.9
Explosiveness69 / 13850.4100 / 13827.7
Standard-down success65 / 13853.311 / 13892.7
Passing-down success63 / 13854.741 / 13870.8
Pass PPA67 / 13851.833 / 13876.6
Rush PPA95 / 13831.428 / 13880.3
Pass explosiveness59 / 13857.776 / 13845.3
Rush explosiveness100 / 13827.798 / 13829.2
Line yards78 / 13843.821 / 13885.4
Second-level yards98 / 13829.214 / 13890.5
Open-field yards110 / 13820.486 / 13838.0
Stuff rate65 / 13853.358 / 13858.4
Power success69 / 13850.4T63 / 13854.4
HavocT98 / 13828.8T53 / 13860.9
Front-seven havocT106 / 13823.0T116 / 13815.0
DB havocT74 / 13844.27 / 13895.6
Points / opportunity62 / 13855.546 / 13867.2
Average field positionT44 / 13867.5T72 / 13847.1
Field-position expected points47 / 13866.482 / 13840.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Dante Moore · QBUsage 37.4% · Avg PPA 0.282 · Total 30.421
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.28230.42137.4%
Pass0.29230.65869.1%
Rush-0.079-0.2372.3%
1st down0.64325.70630.1%
2nd down0.42014.26436.6%
3rd down0.55315.48852.8%
Standard downs0.30418.52529.9%
Passing downs0.25311.89655.3%
Dylan Raiola · QBUsage 32.2% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 13.614
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11213.61432.2%
Pass0.29132.85858.9%
Rush-1.849-14.7944.5%
1st down-0.057-2.75028.1%
2nd down0.0863.42032.0%
3rd down0.2186.75443.1%
Standard downs-0.051-3.79928.3%
Passing downs0.37017.41341.2%
Dierre Hill Jr. · RBUsage 20.4% · Avg PPA -0.012 · Total -1.235
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.012-1.23520.4%
Pass-0.140-3.3499.1%
Rush0.0191.50134.2%
1st down-0.093-4.72523.0%
2nd down0.25210.32924.7%
3rd down0.1561.4039.1%
Standard downs0.0342.82024.1%
Passing downs-0.203-4.05512.6%
Brock Thomas · QBUsage 19.2% · Avg PPA -0.388 · Total -17.461
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.388-17.46119.2%
Pass-0.249-9.97634.5%
Rush-1.497-7.4854.4%
1st down-0.237-3.79615.0%
2nd down-0.096-1.34818.4%
3rd down-0.499-6.48529.5%
Standard downs-0.317-7.62014.7%
Passing downs-0.469-9.84229.6%
Jordon Davison · RBUsage 18.7% · Avg PPA 0.174 · Total 16.313
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.17416.31318.7%
Pass-0.245-1.7172.7%
Rush0.20718.03038.2%
1st down-0.071-3.05219.4%
2nd down0.2929.64119.9%
3rd down0.1722.40414.1%
Standard downs0.17412.72921.2%
Passing downs0.1713.58413.2%
Dakorien Moore · WRUsage 11.9% · Avg PPA 0.047 · Total 2.791
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0472.79111.9%
Pass0.0472.79122.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.054-1.72814.4%
2nd down0.5978.9519.0%
3rd down0.3654.01211.1%
Standard downs-0.217-9.13312.2%
Passing downs0.66211.92511.3%
Brandon Smith · RBUsage 10.9% · Avg PPA 0.328 · Total 8.859
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3288.85910.9%
Pass-0.007-0.0212.4%
Rush0.3708.88020.7%
1st down0.1832.19910.8%
2nd down0.2321.6258.5%
3rd down0.5083.04612.8%
Standard downs0.3747.85711.9%
Passing downs0.1671.0028.5%
Evan Stewart · WRUsage 10.8% · Avg PPA 0.187 · Total 7.087
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1877.08710.8%
Pass0.42214.77819.0%
Rush-2.564-7.6911.9%
1st down0.2783.3387.5%
2nd down-0.054-0.64410.6%
3rd down0.6827.49916.7%
Standard downs0.2214.6518.6%
Passing downs0.1432.43615.9%
Jeremiah McClellan · WRUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA 1.014 · Total 12.168
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.01412.1689.6%
Pass1.01412.16816.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.0508.2007.8%
2nd down0.7072.8279.8%
3rd down0.2851.14114.8%
Standard downs1.5749.4427.5%
Passing downs0.4542.72613.3%
Tradarian Ball · RBUsage 9.5% · Avg PPA 0.739 · Total 6.647
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7396.6479.5%
Pass0.6821.3654.4%
Rush0.7555.28214.6%
1st down0.8073.2288.0%
2nd down0.4001.59913.8%
3rd down1.8191.8197.1%
Standard downs0.3942.3657.9%
Passing downs1.4274.28215.8%
Jamari Johnson · TEUsage 9.2% · Avg PPA 0.644 · Total 20.603
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.64420.6039.2%
Pass0.64420.60317.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7448.1867.4%
2nd down0.96310.5889.3%
3rd down0.1831.83014.3%
Standard downs0.93514.9556.8%
Passing downs0.3535.64814.0%
Da'Jaun Riggs · RBUsage 7.7% · Avg PPA 0.333 · Total 3.999
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3333.9997.7%
Pass0.5981.1962.6%
Rush0.2802.80313.3%
1st down0.3682.5769.5%
2nd down0.2851.42310.4%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2522.5189.0%
Passing downs0.7401.4814.4%
Messiah Hampton · WRUsage 7.4% · Avg PPA 0.398 · Total 10.759
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.39810.7597.4%
Pass0.39810.75914.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2963.8428.0%
2nd down-0.047-0.2845.1%
3rd down0.9007.20011.3%
Standard downs0.3586.0936.9%
Passing downs0.4674.6668.5%
Hudson Lewis · WRUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.231 · Total 3.237
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2313.2376.0%
Pass0.2313.23711.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.590-3.5415.5%
2nd down1.2446.2216.7%
3rd down-0.595-1.1914.7%
Standard downs-0.320-2.8765.3%
Passing downs1.2236.1137.9%
Akili Smith Jr. · QBUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA 0.191 · Total 0.953
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1910.9535.3%
Pass0.2571.0278.9%
Rush-0.074-0.0742.1%
1st down-0.264-0.7936.0%
2nd down-0.074-0.0743.4%
3rd down1.8191.8197.1%
Standard downs-0.217-0.8675.3%
Passing downs1.8191.8195.3%
Jalen Lott · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.520 · Total 3.119
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5203.1194.3%
Pass0.5203.1198.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0350.0713.5%
2nd down-0.200-0.3994.3%
3rd down1.6851.6853.3%
Standard downs0.8803.5194.6%
Passing downs-0.200-0.3993.8%
Andrew Olesh · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.758 · Total 3.790
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7583.7903.2%
Pass0.7583.7906.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.998-0.9981.4%
2nd down-0.740-0.7402.1%
3rd down1.8425.52710.3%
Standard downs-0.998-0.9980.9%
Passing downs1.1974.7878.9%
Brady Bidwell · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.608 · Total 1.824
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6081.8243.2%
Pass0.6081.8246.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.114-1.1142.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.4692.93814.3%
Standard downs-1.114-1.1141.3%
Passing downs1.4692.93810.5%
Kendre Harrison · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 1.278 · Total 6.391
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2786.3913.2%
Pass1.2786.3916.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.2983.8953.8%
2nd down-0.147-0.1472.0%
3rd down2.6432.6433.7%
Standard downs1.2983.8952.6%
Passing downs1.2482.4974.9%
Gatlin Bair · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA -0.138 · Total -0.826
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.138-0.8262.4%
Pass-0.138-0.8264.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0930.2782.7%
2nd down-0.862-1.7252.4%
3rd down0.6210.6212.1%
Standard downs-0.138-0.8263.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Iverson Hooks · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.172 · Total -0.688
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.172-0.6882.3%
Pass-0.172-0.6884.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6380.6381.2%
2nd down-0.756-1.5123.6%
3rd down0.1860.1863.3%
Standard downs-0.087-0.1731.5%
Passing downs-0.257-0.5154.9%
Nathan McCoy II · WRUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.161 · Total 0.322
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1610.3222.1%
Pass0.1610.3224.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1610.3224.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1610.3222.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
A.J. Pugliano · TEUsage 1.1% · Avg PPA -0.330 · Total -0.330
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.330-0.3301.1%
Pass-0.330-0.3302.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.330-0.3302.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.330-0.3301.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Oregon sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.137 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.432 (52nd percentile; 138 teams)52ndOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.242 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.220 (52nd percentile; 138 teams)52ndOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.051 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.032 (86th percentile; 138 teams)86thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.353 (87th percentile; 138 teams)87thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.279 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.166 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61st
Values and percentiles
Oregon metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.13750th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.43252nd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.24250th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.22052nd138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.05131st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.03286th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.35387th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.27928th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16661st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 259 attempts charted. Average depth of target 7.5 yards (18th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.4 per completion. Completion 64.9%, 7.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.22.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense63.4%63.6%-0.2183 / 259
Defense allowed55.2%61.7%-6.5145 / 213

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Oregon.

Target mix by zone, Oregon offense
Short left27% · 68Short middle16% · 41Short right43% · 108Deep left5% · 12Deep middle3% · 8Deep right6% · 16

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Oregon passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense25999%7.56.464.9%0.22-0.2 pp183
Passing defense21399%7.85.154.0%0.08-6.5 pp145

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2354.246.4%0.143.101.000.9015.8%73.0%
Defense allowed2453.735.3%0.032.800.801.2017.4%70.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense234 / 235232311220221 / 222 · 99.5%
Defense allowed244 / 245237814670224 / 224 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -0.2 pp. 5 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-14.30.014.4W1W1 vs Boise State: +10.9 ppW2W3W4W4 vs USC: +14.4 ppW6W6 vs UCLA: -14.3 ppW7W7 vs Nebraska: -13.1 ppW8W8 vs Illinois: +0.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Boise State393773.0%62.0%+10.9 pp5.70.21254.80.20
W2Oklahoma State290———9.10.09303.0-0.14
W3Portland State430———8.40.83505.40.54
W4USC353476.5%62.1%+14.4 pp8.40.79334.00.12
W6UCLA343348.5%62.8%-14.3 pp8.0-0.53272.7-0.50
W7Nebraska383852.6%65.7%-13.1 pp5.2-0.13383.40.08
W8Illinois414165.9%65.0%+0.9 pp8.10.13325.60.33

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

29 punts · 46.7 gross yards/punt · 45.3 net yards/punt

8 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 29/29 punts. Known net yards: 24/29 punts.

Our punt returns

11 returns · 8.6 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 11/11 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Illinois545.645.65/5
Week 7 · Nebraska743.644.76/7
Week 6 · UCLA648.244.34/6
Week 4 · USC247.045.02/2
Week 3 · Portland State130.030.01/1
Team style
Rating history