Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Notre Dame

2026 season

FBS Independents
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Notre Dame's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 1 across 8 systems; best 1, worst 3, so they disagree by 2 places.

Lab EPA
#1
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#1
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#3
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#1
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#2
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#1
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#3
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#1
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#13 of 138
Schedule strength
#41 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#47 of 138
Game control
#4 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#1 of 138
Offense
#3 of 138
Defense
#3 of 138
Special teams
#37 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Notre Dame · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.265 net EPA/play

#1

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

19.89 points

#1 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +21.93 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +1.07, schedule #35 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +23.00 on its own; the preseason prior of +10.55 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +19.89.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Notre Dame · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Wisconsin
neutral · 2026-09-06 · ID 401858438
+28.00 → +28.000.000.76379.52%+8.972.6670.8543.521
Week 2 · Rice
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401859184
+52.00 → +35.00-2.500.79379.90%-9.253.217-0.9162.301
Week 3 · Michigan State
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858453
+17.00 → +17.00-2.500.824910.29%+0.051.4920.0051.497
Week 4 · Purdue
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858467
+39.00 → +35.00+2.500.857210.69%+0.884.0090.0944.103
Week 5 · North Carolina
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858250
+11.00 → +11.00+2.500.890911.11%+2.841.5000.3161.815
Week 6 · Stanford
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858257
+51.00 → +35.00-2.500.925911.55%-7.743.753-0.8942.859
Week 7 · BYU
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856809
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.962212.00%+11.22-0.1801.3461.166

Game terms +17.26 points; prior term +2.63 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +19.89 points. The preseason prior is +10.55 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

25.2 SP+ points

#3 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

34.44 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#1 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 17.78 on 373 plays; defense -16.66 on 301 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA and local SRS assign the same rank at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-1 · conf 0-0 · home 3-0 · away 2-1 · expected wins 6.5
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #5 · Coaches Poll #6
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-3 ATS (+0.1 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (+4.4 avg)
Head coach
Marcus Freeman · hired 2021-12-03 · 34-7 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #9 (276 pts) · 2025 #12 (270 pts) · 2026 #5 (299 pts)
Returning
51% of production · 46% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing91%92%
Receiving38%34%
Rushing12%17%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back183.780.916616.50
Defensive Line173.650.914815.55
Linebacker103.600.92059.20
Offensive Line193.950.917217.43
Quarterback54.000.92154.61
Receiver203.800.911118.22
Running Back64.000.93755.63
Special Teams73.290.86936.09

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
C.J. Carr · QB

CFBD athlete 5079369. Notre Dame (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.58421143.6%
Pass 89.0% · Rush 7.7%

1st 40.6% · 2nd 42.9% · 3rd 50.0%

Standard downs 41.1% · Passing downs 51.7%

2024: 4★ · 0.9685
Nolan James Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5189515. Notre Dame (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2888619.7%
Pass 7.3% · Rush 30.9%

1st 21.5% · 2nd 17.1% · 3rd 22.7%

Standard downs 21.2% · Passing downs 14.7%

2025: 4★ · 0.9051
Aneyas Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 5079742. Notre Dame (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2377416.2%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 27.0%

1st 18.3% · 2nd 16.5% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 16.2% · Passing downs 16.4%

2024: 4★ · 0.9126
Jonaz Walton · RB

CFBD athlete 5159087. Notre Dame (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3186014.4%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 25.0%

1st 15.3% · 2nd 15.6% · 3rd 7.6%

Standard downs 14.8% · Passing downs 13.0%

2026: 4★ · 0.9472
Spencer Porath · PK

CFBD athlete 5148363. Notre Dame (2026–2026); Purdue (2024–2025)

Kicker PAAR4.79011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 3★ · 0.8067
Brayden Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5159080. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.4%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Bubba Frazier · WR

CFBD athlete 5245466. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Cooper Flanagan · TE

CFBD athlete 4870733. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 7.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 1.8%

Not linked
Devin Fitzgerald · WR

CFBD athlete 5271466. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Elijah Burress · WR

CFBD athlete 5198104. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 6.0% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Ian Premer · TE

CFBD athlete 5210543. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jack Larsen · TE

CFBD athlete 5218514. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 9.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Jaden Greathouse · WR

CFBD athlete 4870768. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 13.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 6.9%

Not linked
James Flanigan · TE

CFBD athlete 5142596. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 3.2%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 1.2%

Not linked
Javian Osborne · RB

CFBD athlete 5160472. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 13.8%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 8.8% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Jerome Bettis Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5164349. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 8.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Jordan Faison · WR

CFBD athlete 5150424. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.5%
Pass 21.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 12.3% · 2nd 7.6% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 9.8% · Passing downs 8.6%

Not linked
Kedren Young · RB

CFBD athlete 5106301. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 9.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 5.0% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked
Logan Saldate · WR

CFBD athlete 5146164. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Matt Jeffery · WR

CFBD athlete 5218507. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Micah Gilbert · WR

CFBD athlete 5079475. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 15.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.6% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 5.0% · Passing downs 12.1%

Not linked
Mylan Graham · WR

CFBD athlete 5079444. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 5.2%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Noah Grubbs · QB

CFBD athlete 5159115. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.7%
Pass 25.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 14.1% · 3rd 13.9%

Standard downs 9.1% · Passing downs 17.1%

Not linked
Teddy Jarrard · QB

CFBD athlete 5280155. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Ty Washington · TE

CFBD athlete 4837392. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 7 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
DJ McKinney · CBColorado2026-01-094★ / 0.9100Immediate
Francis Brewu · DLPittsburgh2026-01-134★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jayden Sanders · CBMichigan2026-01-124★ / 0.9200Immediate
Keon Keeley · DLAlabama2026-01-124★ / 0.9300Immediate
Mylan Graham · WROhio State2026-01-134★ / 0.9100Immediate
Quincy Porter · WROhio State2026-01-124★ / 0.9400Immediate
Tionne Gray · DLOregon2026-01-154★ / 0.9400Immediate
Outgoing · 16 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anthony Sacca · LBUCLA2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Armel Mukam · DLNot reported2026-01-114★ / —Withdrawn
Ben Minich · SMiami (OH)2026-01-084★ / —Immediate
Bodie Kahoun · LBBoston College2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chance Tucker · CBNot reported2025-12-243★ / —Immediate
Cree Thomas · CBColorado2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Gi'Bran Payne · RBCincinnati2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
JaDon Blair · SMissouri2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Joshua Burnham · EDGEIndiana2026-01-053★ / 0.8900Immediate
Junior Tuihalamaka · EDGELSU2026-08-204★ / —Immediate
KK Smith · WRMichigan State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Karson Hobbs · CBFlorida State2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kenny Minchey · QBKentucky2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Preston Zinter · EDGERice2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Scrap Richardson · WRAuburn2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Taebron Bennie-Powell · SBoise State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Notre Dame. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Marcus Freeman · career 43–12 across 6 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 25 appointments
  1. 2021–present · Marcus Freeman · active at capture

    43–12 · 55 attributed games · 6 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2010–2021 · Brian Kelly

    113–40 · 153 attributed games · 12 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2009-12-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2005–2009 · Charlie Weis

    35–27 · 62 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2004-11-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2002–2004 · Tyrone Willingham

    21–15 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2001-12-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1997–2001 · Bob Davie

    35–25 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1986–1996 · Lou Holtz

    100–30–2 · 132 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1981–1985 · Gerry Faust

    30–26–1 · 57 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1975–1980 · Dan Devine

    53–16–1 · 70 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1964–1974 · Ara Parseghian

    95–17–4 · 116 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1963–1963 · Hugh Devore

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1959–1962 · Joe Kuharich

    17–23 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1954–1958 · Terry Brennan

    32–18 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1946–1953 · Frank Leahy

    63–8–6 · 77 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1945–1945 · Hugh Devore

    7–2–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1944–1944 · Ed McKeever

    8–2 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1941–1943 · Frank Leahy

    24–3–3 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1934–1940 · Elmer Layden

    47–13–3 · 63 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1931–1933 · Hunk Anderson

    16–9–2 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1918–1930 · Knute Rockne

    105–12–5 · 122 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1913–1917 · Jesse Harper

    34–5–1 · 40 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1905–1905 · Henry McGlew

    5–4 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1904–1904 · Louis Salmon

    5–3 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1902–1902 · James Faragher

    6–2–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1900–1901 · Patrick O'Dea

    14–4–2 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1899–1899 · James McWeeney

    6–3–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Marcus Freeman · incomplete attribution0–0——24.822.95—
2025 · Marcus Freeman10–20–00–024.424.11210
2024 · Marcus Freeman14–20–03–123.92292
2023 · Marcus Freeman10–30–01–020.118.31214
2022 · Marcus Freeman9–41–01–010.310718
2021 · Brian Kelly · incomplete attribution11–1——17.416.498
2021 · Marcus Freeman · incomplete attribution0–1——17.416.498
2020 · Brian Kelly10–29–10–121—175
2019 · Brian Kelly11–20–01–017.718.81612
2018 · Brian Kelly12–10–00–120.717.710—
2017 · Brian Kelly10–30–01–020.8221011
2016 · Brian Kelly4–80–00–015.76.415—
2015 · Brian Kelly10–30–00–122.417.51311
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-19 18:21:46 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play3 / 13898.516 / 13889.1
Success rate7 / 13895.622 / 13884.7
Explosiveness105 / 13824.151 / 13863.5
Standard-down success1 / 138100.016 / 13889.1
Passing-down success95 / 13831.453 / 13862.0
Pass PPA9 / 13894.262 / 13855.5
Rush PPA13 / 13891.23 / 13898.5
Pass explosiveness101 / 13827.017 / 13888.3
Rush explosiveness91 / 13834.343 / 13869.3
Line yards38 / 13873.012 / 13892.0
Second-level yards117 / 13815.33 / 13898.5
Open-field yards82 / 13840.91 / 138100.0
Stuff rate23 / 13883.929 / 13879.6
Power success28 / 13880.3T88 / 13836.1
Havoc7 / 13895.6T7 / 13895.3
Front-seven havoc1 / 138100.0T18 / 13886.9
DB havocT101 / 13826.6T11 / 13892.0
Points / opportunity2 / 13899.352 / 13862.8
Average field positionT34 / 13874.8T11 / 13891.6
Field-position expected points39 / 13872.39 / 13894.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

C.J. Carr · QBUsage 43.6% · Avg PPA 0.490 · Total 105.448
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.490105.44843.6%
Pass0.46991.48289.0%
Rush0.69813.9667.7%
1st down0.39935.49940.6%
2nd down0.52738.46742.9%
3rd down0.52122.93150.0%
Standard downs0.51679.97041.1%
Passing downs0.42525.47851.7%
Nolan James Jr. · RBUsage 19.7% · Avg PPA 0.302 · Total 29.318
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.30229.31819.7%
Pass0.3956.3167.3%
Rush0.28823.06530.9%
1st down0.1195.61021.5%
2nd down0.1845.33917.1%
3rd down0.85317.05922.7%
Standard downs0.31325.03121.2%
Passing downs0.2524.28714.7%
Aneyas Williams · RBUsage 16.2% · Avg PPA 0.259 · Total 20.734
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.25920.73416.2%
Pass0.7387.3774.6%
Rush0.19113.35827.0%
1st down-0.128-5.13318.3%
2nd down0.64818.13716.5%
3rd down0.5155.66812.5%
Standard downs0.1478.99016.2%
Passing downs0.61811.74516.4%
Jonaz Walton · RBUsage 14.4% · Avg PPA 0.357 · Total 22.157
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35722.15714.4%
Pass0.6663.3282.6%
Rush0.33018.82925.0%
1st down0.1293.74215.3%
2nd down0.80318.47815.6%
3rd down-0.510-3.0627.6%
Standard downs0.22511.00514.8%
Passing downs0.85811.15213.0%
Noah Grubbs · QBUsage 10.7% · Avg PPA 0.445 · Total 9.779
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4459.77910.7%
Pass0.4459.77925.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3101.8626.3%
2nd down0.6666.66414.1%
3rd down1.0625.31213.9%
Standard downs0.3064.5969.1%
Passing downs0.7415.18417.1%
Jordan Faison · WRUsage 9.5% · Avg PPA 0.665 · Total 31.254
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.66531.2549.5%
Pass0.66531.25421.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3699.96612.3%
2nd down0.79510.3367.6%
3rd down1.5399.2366.8%
Standard downs0.63323.4149.8%
Passing downs0.7847.8408.6%
Javian Osborne · RBUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.015 · Total 0.163
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0150.1637.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.0150.16313.8%
1st down0.0440.1776.1%
2nd down0.1200.4818.0%
3rd down-0.165-0.49511.1%
Standard downs0.1821.8248.8%
Passing downs-1.662-1.6623.1%
Micah Gilbert · WRUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.930 · Total 30.689
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.93030.6896.7%
Pass0.93030.68915.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8098.0924.6%
2nd down1.05014.7018.2%
3rd down0.7024.9118.0%
Standard downs0.88316.7715.0%
Passing downs0.99413.91812.1%
Jaden Greathouse · WRUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.631 · Total 18.918
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.63118.9186.1%
Pass0.63118.91813.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4194.6125.0%
2nd down0.5105.6136.5%
3rd down0.9386.5688.0%
Standard downs0.65414.3885.8%
Passing downs0.5664.5316.9%
Kedren Young · RBUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.116 · Total 1.388
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1161.3885.8%
Pass0.8941.7892.2%
Rush-0.040-0.4019.0%
1st down-0.185-1.1096.3%
2nd down0.3541.0624.1%
3rd down0.4791.4368.3%
Standard downs0.0960.7655.0%
Passing downs0.1560.6238.3%
Jack Larsen · TEUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.266 · Total 2.659
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2662.6594.5%
Pass0.2662.6599.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.031-0.1254.2%
2nd down0.0290.1145.3%
3rd down1.3352.6704.3%
Standard downs0.3773.0194.8%
Passing downs-0.180-0.3603.4%
Elijah Burress · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.625 · Total 3.748
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6253.7484.1%
Pass0.6253.74810.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.6613.3223.0%
2nd down0.1310.3946.0%
3rd down0.0310.0313.7%
Standard downs1.0144.0573.5%
Passing downs-0.155-0.3096.3%
Cooper Flanagan · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.002 · Total 0.014
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0020.0143.4%
Pass0.0020.0147.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2840.5691.6%
2nd down0.6033.6196.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0160.1303.8%
Passing downs-0.116-0.1161.8%
Jerome Bettis Jr. · WRUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.417 · Total 2.920
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4172.9203.4%
Pass0.4172.9208.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9623.8474.2%
2nd down-0.345-0.6902.8%
3rd down-0.237-0.2372.8%
Standard downs0.6193.0933.0%
Passing downs-0.087-0.1734.9%
Teddy Jarrard · QBUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 1.303 · Total 2.605
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.3032.6053.0%
Pass1.3032.6056.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3032.6056.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.3032.6053.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Logan Saldate · WRUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.856 · Total 3.424
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8563.4242.8%
Pass0.8563.4246.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6151.8444.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.5801.5803.7%
Standard downs0.6151.8442.7%
Passing downs1.5801.5803.1%
Mylan Graham · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA -0.132 · Total -1.452
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.132-1.4522.7%
Pass-0.132-1.4525.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.013-0.0532.2%
2nd down-0.218-0.6552.1%
3rd down-0.186-0.7445.2%
Standard downs-0.101-0.7082.2%
Passing downs-0.186-0.7444.0%
James Flanigan · TEUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.234 · Total 2.102
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2342.1022.5%
Pass0.2342.1025.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0440.1331.9%
2nd down0.2180.8733.2%
3rd down0.5481.0953.2%
Standard downs0.2742.1952.9%
Passing downs-0.094-0.0941.2%
Matt Jeffery · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 1.243 · Total 3.729
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2433.7292.4%
Pass1.2433.7295.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3680.3681.7%
2nd down0.6650.6652.3%
3rd down2.6962.6964.5%
Standard downs1.5323.0641.9%
Passing downs0.6650.6654.3%
Brayden Robinson · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -2.999 · Total -2.999
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-2.999-2.9991.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-2.999-2.9992.4%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-2.999-2.9995.9%
Bubba Frazier · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -4.059 · Total -4.059
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-4.059-4.0591.5%
Pass-4.059-4.0593.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-4.059-4.0591.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ty Washington · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.203 · Total -0.813
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.203-0.8131.5%
Pass-0.203-0.8133.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.203-0.8134.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.203-0.8131.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Devin Fitzgerald · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.904 · Total 1.808
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9041.8081.4%
Pass0.9041.8083.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.6981.6981.5%
2nd down0.1100.1102.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.9041.8081.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ian Premer · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 1.057 · Total 1.057
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0571.0571.3%
Pass1.0571.0573.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.0571.0573.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.0571.0571.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Notre Dame sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.345 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.509 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.173 (24th percentile; 138 teams)24thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.474 (94th percentile; 138 teams)94thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.227 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.047 (89th percentile; 138 teams)89thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.357 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.192 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.206 (95th percentile; 138 teams)95th
Values and percentiles
Notre Dame metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.34599th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.50996th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.17324th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.47494th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.22791st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.04789th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.35785th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.19264th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.20695th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 218 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.6 yards (76th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.0 per completion. Completion 66.5%, 8.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.48.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense66.2%59.0%+7.3216 / 218
Defense allowed61.5%62.1%-0.6182 / 185

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Notre Dame.

Target mix by zone, Notre Dame offense
Short left33% · 70Short middle15% · 32Short right33% · 71Deep left7% · 14Deep middle7% · 14Deep right7% · 14

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Notre Dame passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense21899%9.65.066.5%0.48+7.3 pp216
Passing defense18599%7.74.661.6%0.16-0.6 pp182

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2624.951.2%0.263.400.901.1011.9%81.1%
Defense allowed1962.330.3%-0.122.600.600.1020.2%73.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense260 / 262252102880251 / 252 · 99.6%
Defense allowed194 / 196191515130178 / 178 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +7.3 pp. 7 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-0.19.018.1W1W1 vs Wisconsin: -0.1 ppW2W2 vs Rice: +18.1 ppW3W3 vs Michigan State: +16.7 ppW4W4 vs Purdue: +6.9 ppW5W5 vs North Carolina: +6.8 ppW6W6 vs Stanford: +7.5 ppW7W7 vs BYU: -0.1 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Wisconsin292965.5%65.6%-0.1 pp6.00.44323.50.23
W2Rice333375.8%57.7%+18.1 pp10.20.70323.70.14
W3Michigan State242475.0%58.3%+16.7 pp10.30.55433.70.13
W4Purdue262560.0%53.1%+6.9 pp13.30.62325.50.25
W5North Carolina302969.0%62.1%+6.8 pp7.90.40455.40.26
W6Stanford272770.4%62.9%+7.5 pp8.50.59487.60.59
W7BYU494955.1%55.2%-0.1 pp10.70.25303.80.14

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

15 punts · 43.6 gross yards/punt · 44.9 net yards/punt

4 inside the 20 · 0 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 15/15 punts. Known net yards: 12/15 punts.

Our punt returns

11 returns · 11.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 11/11 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · BYU450.544.54/4
Week 6 · Stanford238.044.01/2
Week 5 · North Carolina134.0—0/1
Week 4 · Purdue346.346.03/3
Week 3 · Michigan State149.049.01/1
Team style
Rating history