Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Northwestern

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Northwestern's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 16 across 8 systems; best 11, worst 22, so they disagree by 11 places.

Lab EPA
#11
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#16
up 42026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#20
up 62026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#22
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#20
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#16
up 1 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#16
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#11
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#17 of 138
Schedule strength
#53 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#12 of 138
Game control
#20 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#17 of 138
Offense
#19 of 138
Defense
#37 of 138
Special teams
#64 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Northwestern · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.171 net EPA/play

#11

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

10.95 points

#16 · Up 4 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +17.18 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.27, schedule #73 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.23. That is worth +13.91 on its own; the preseason prior of +1.71 still carries 24% of the weight, giving +10.95.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Northwestern · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · South Dakota State
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401858431
+16.00 → +16.00-2.500.76379.29%-25.00 (fixed lower division)1.254-2.321-1.068
Week 3 · Colorado
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856796
+34.00 → +34.00-2.500.824910.03%-6.213.159-0.6232.536
Week 4 · Indiana
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858461
-6.00 → -6.00+2.500.857210.42%+17.33-0.3651.8061.441
Week 5 · Penn State
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858476
+21.00 → +21.00-2.500.890910.83%+7.112.0040.7702.774
Week 6 · Ball State
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858482
+31.00 → +31.00-2.500.925911.26%-12.593.208-1.4181.791
Week 7 · Michigan State
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858491
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.962211.70%+0.050.6430.0060.649
Week 8 · Rutgers
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858498
+28.00 → +28.00-2.501.000012.16%-5.703.100-0.6932.407

Game terms +10.53 points; prior term +0.42 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +10.95 points. The preseason prior is +1.71 with 24.32% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.1 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

13.7 SP+ points

#20 · Up 6 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

16.91 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#16 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 13.73 on 354 plays; defense -3.18 on 339 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Northwestern 5 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-1 · conf 3-1 · home 5-0 · away 1-1 · expected wins 6.1
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #20 · Coaches Poll #18
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-2 ATS (+10.9 avg) · 2025: 9-4 ATS (+5.2 avg)
Head coach
David Braun · hired 2023-07-10 · 19-19 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #80 (166 pts) · 2025 #66 (188 pts) · 2026 #52 (205 pts)
Returning
89% of production · 95% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing94%100%
Receiving86%89%
Rushing88%95%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back152.930.850812.76
Defensive Line163.000.861013.78
Linebacker63.170.86225.17
Offensive Line163.060.866313.86
Quarterback43.000.85873.43
Receiver123.000.858510.30
Running Back43.000.86653.47
Special Teams82.880.84076.73

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Aidan Chiles · QB

CFBD athlete 5075805. Northwestern (2026–2026); Michigan State (2024–2025); Oregon State (2023–2023)

Passing WEPA0.53316051.0%
Pass 97.2% · Rush 21.5%

1st 50.9% · 2nd 36.8% · 3rd 73.5%

Standard downs 48.8% · Passing downs 56.4%

2023: 4★ · 0.9365
Caleb Komolafe · RB

CFBD athlete 5078244. Northwestern (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2148222.0%
Pass 6.6% · Rush 33.7%

1st 24.3% · 2nd 25.0% · 3rd 12.0%

Standard downs 25.5% · Passing downs 13.5%

2023: 3★ · 0.8436
Aidan Chiles · QB

CFBD athlete 5075805. Northwestern (2026–2026); Michigan State (2024–2025); Oregon State (2023–2023)

Rushing WEPA0.4295951.0%
Pass 97.2% · Rush 21.5%

1st 50.9% · 2nd 36.8% · 3rd 73.5%

Standard downs 48.8% · Passing downs 56.4%

2023: 4★ · 0.9365
Gavin Sawchuk · RB

CFBD athlete 4685545. Florida State (2025–2025); Northwestern (2026–2026); Oklahoma (2022–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.0563610.1%
Pass 1.1% · Rush 16.9%

1st 9.9% · 2nd 12.5% · 3rd 7.2%

Standard downs 9.9% · Passing downs 10.5%

2022: 4★ · 0.9583
Joseph Himon II · RB

CFBD athlete 4816307. Northwestern (2022–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1993610.5%
Pass 5.5% · Rush 14.6%

1st 11.3% · 2nd 14.6% · 3rd 2.4%

Standard downs 9.6% · Passing downs 12.8%

2022: 3★ · 0.8752
Jackson Kleather · PK

CFBD athlete 5122027. Northwestern (2026–2026); Bowling Green (2023–2025)

Kicker PAAR3.85014—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: 3★ · 0.8167
Alex Honig · TE

CFBD athlete 4569262. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.9% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 4.9% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Daniel Anderson · RB

CFBD athlete 5149001. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.4%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Drew Wagner · WR

CFBD athlete 5222752. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.9%
Pass 17.7% · Rush 1.5%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 10.8%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Frank Covey IV · WR

CFBD athlete 4917942. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Griffin Wilde · WR

CFBD athlete 5154734. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.1%
Pass 25.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 12.6% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 10.8%

Standard downs 10.9% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked
Hayden Eligon Ii · WR

CFBD athlete 5084772. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 8.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Luke Dehnicke · TE

CFBD athlete 5328488. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 15.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.8% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 7.6% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Marcus Romain · RB

CFBD athlete 5199860. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.8%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 7.4% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 7.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Nicco Marchiol · QB

CFBD athlete 4685459. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 2.1% · Rush 2.5%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 13.6%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Ricky Ahumaraeze · WR

CFBD athlete 4921291. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 9.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 1.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Robby Preckel · TE

CFBD athlete 5216569. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 0.5%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 1.7%

Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Ryan Boe · QB

CFBD athlete 5193492. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.3%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Sean Morris II · RB

CFBD athlete 5161830. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.3%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 17 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aidan Chiles · QBMichigan State2026-01-074★ / 0.9000Immediate
Alex Honig · TEUConn2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Arkel Anugwom · OTAlabama2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Brenden Deasfernandes · CBCentral Michigan2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
David Anchondo · OTSaginaw Valley State2025-12-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dominic Kirks · EDGEOhio State2026-01-223★ / 0.8600Immediate
Evan Boutorwick · LSMichigan2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Gavin Sawchuk · RBFlorida State2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Glory Stephen-Wangboje · DLSacred Heart2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Grant Seagren · OTOklahoma State2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Kleather · KBowling Green2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Jamaal Johnson · EDGEUCF2026-01-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kobie McKinzie · LBOklahoma2026-01-064★ / 0.9000Immediate
Luke Dehnicke · TEMinnesota Duluth2026-01-093★ / 0.8800Immediate
Mar'Kel Porter · RBBowling Green2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Montae Pate · CBWeber State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nicco Marchiol · QBWest Virginia2026-03-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 8 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anto Saka · EDGETexas A&M2026-01-074★ / 0.9200Immediate
Dashun Reeder · RBUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dillon Tatum · SMiami (OH)2026-01-064★ / —Immediate
Evan Smith · CBDuke2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hayden Wright · OTHouston2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Hunter Welcing · TEOhio State2026-01-124★ / 0.9100Immediate
Jack Olsen · KMiami2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nick Herzog · OTNot reported2026-01-083★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Northwestern. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

David Braun · career 19–19 across 4 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 30 appointments
  1. 2023–present · David Braun · active at capture

    19–19 · 38 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2023-07-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2006–2022 · Pat Fitzgerald

    110–101 · 211 attributed games · 17 seasons

    Hired 2006-07-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 1999–2005 · Randy Walker

    37–46 · 83 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1992–1998 · Gary Barnett

    35–45–1 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1986–1991 · Francis Peay

    13–51–2 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1981–1985 · Dennis Green

    10–45 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1978–1980 · Rick Venturi

    1–31–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1973–1977 · John Pont

    12–43 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1964–1972 · Alex Agase

    32–58–1 · 91 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1956–1963 · Ara Parseghian

    36–35–1 · 72 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1955–1955 · Lou Saban

    0–8–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1947–1954 · Robert Voigts

    33–39–1 · 73 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1935–1946 · Pappy Waldorf

    49–45–7 · 101 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1927–1934 · Dick Hanley

    36–26–4 · 66 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1922–1926 · Glenn Thistlethwaite

    21–17–1 · 39 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1920–1921 · Elmer McDevitt

    4–10 · 14 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1919–1919 · Charlie Bachman

    2–5 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1914–1918 · Fred Murphy

    16–16–1 · 33 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1913–1913 · Dennis Grady

    1–6 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1910–1912 · Charles Hammett

    6–10–2 · 18 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1909–1909 · Bill Horr

    1–3–1 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1908–1908 · Alton Johnson

    2–2 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1903–1905 · Walter McCornack

    26–5–4 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1899–1902 · Charles Hollister

    27–16–4 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1898–1898 · W.H. Bannard

    9–4–1 · 14 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1897–1897 · Jesse Van Doozer

    5–3 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1895–1896 · Alvin Culver

    12–6–2 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1894–1894 · A.A. Ewing

    4–5 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  29. 1893–1893 · Paul Noyes

    2–5–3 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  30. 1892–1892 · Knowlton Ames

    5–3–2 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · David Braun · incomplete attribution0–0——12.615.552—
2025 · David Braun7–64–51–05.84.466—
2024 · David Braun4–82–70–0-8.2-3.380—
2023 · David Braun8–55–41–0-1.3-0.347—
2022 · Pat Fitzgerald1–111–80–0-13.4-7.248—
2021 · Pat Fitzgerald3–91–80–0-11.1-7.250—
2020 · Pat Fitzgerald7–26–21–0912.24710
2019 · Pat Fitzgerald3–91–80–0-5.5-3.252—
2018 · Pat Fitzgerald9–58–21–01.96.358—
2017 · Pat Fitzgerald10–37–21–011.213.15017
2016 · Pat Fitzgerald7–65–41–02.99.952—
2015 · Pat Fitzgerald10–36–20–10.235523
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:12:27 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play7 / 13895.642 / 13870.1
Success rate12 / 13892.090 / 13835.0
Explosiveness13 / 13891.223 / 13883.9
Standard-down success29 / 13879.6102 / 13826.3
Passing-down success7 / 13895.639 / 13872.3
Pass PPA11 / 13892.724 / 13883.2
Rush PPA18 / 13887.682 / 13840.9
Pass explosiveness50 / 13864.29 / 13894.2
Rush explosiveness13 / 13891.261 / 13856.2
Line yards79 / 13843.1119 / 13813.9
Second-level yards7 / 13895.676 / 13845.3
Open-field yards10 / 13893.4108 / 13821.9
Stuff rate109 / 13821.2108 / 13821.9
Power success60 / 13856.946 / 13867.2
Havoc81 / 13841.6T51 / 13863.1
Front-seven havocT123 / 13810.2T123 / 13810.6
DB havocT12 / 13891.63 / 13898.5
Points / opportunity14 / 13890.511 / 13892.7
Average field positionT96 / 13829.9T48 / 13863.9
Field-position expected points104 / 13824.846 / 13867.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Aidan Chiles · QBUsage 51.0% · Avg PPA 0.533 · Total 123.693
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.533123.69351.0%
Pass0.51891.25197.2%
Rush0.57932.44221.5%
1st down0.40345.49650.9%
2nd down0.61432.56436.8%
3rd down0.69242.22073.5%
Standard downs0.45771.76248.8%
Passing downs0.69251.93156.4%
Caleb Komolafe · RBUsage 22.0% · Avg PPA 0.236 · Total 23.595
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.23623.59522.0%
Pass0.6287.5386.6%
Rush0.18216.05633.7%
1st down0.23112.49624.3%
2nd down0.2187.83225.0%
3rd down0.3273.26612.0%
Standard downs0.17314.22625.5%
Passing downs0.5209.36913.5%
Joseph Himon II · RBUsage 10.5% · Avg PPA 0.360 · Total 17.274
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.36017.27410.5%
Pass0.6116.1085.5%
Rush0.29411.16614.6%
1st down0.56714.16611.3%
2nd down0.2154.51314.6%
3rd down-0.703-1.4062.4%
Standard downs0.44013.6429.6%
Passing downs0.2143.63312.8%
Gavin Sawchuk · RBUsage 10.1% · Avg PPA -0.066 · Total -3.040
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.066-3.04010.1%
Pass-0.762-1.5231.1%
Rush-0.034-1.51716.9%
1st down-0.432-9.5019.9%
2nd down0.3315.96012.5%
3rd down0.0840.5017.2%
Standard downs-0.314-10.0559.9%
Passing downs0.5017.01510.5%
Griffin Wilde · WRUsage 10.1% · Avg PPA 1.052 · Total 48.392
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.05248.39210.1%
Pass1.05248.39225.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.63417.75312.6%
2nd down1.35610.8465.6%
3rd down1.86816.81010.8%
Standard downs0.78127.33010.9%
Passing downs1.91521.0628.3%
Drew Wagner · WRUsage 7.9% · Avg PPA 0.481 · Total 17.328
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48117.3287.9%
Pass0.48915.63817.7%
Rush0.4231.6901.5%
1st down0.89913.4816.8%
2nd down0.0160.1938.3%
3rd down0.4063.65310.8%
Standard downs0.60112.6166.5%
Passing downs0.3144.71211.3%
Luke Dehnicke · TEUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA 1.033 · Total 13.432
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.03313.4326.9%
Pass1.03313.43215.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.2168.5127.8%
2nd down0.8842.6525.0%
3rd down0.7562.2688.3%
Standard downs1.01510.1547.6%
Passing downs1.0933.2795.4%
Alex Honig · TEUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.792 · Total 16.640
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.79216.6405.5%
Pass0.79216.64013.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4525.8756.9%
2nd down1.9597.8363.4%
3rd down2.3156.9444.3%
Standard downs0.4525.8754.9%
Passing downs1.34610.7657.1%
Marcus Romain · RBUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA -0.327 · Total -1.310
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.327-1.3105.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.327-1.3107.8%
1st down-0.063-0.0632.9%
2nd down-0.477-0.9557.4%
3rd down-0.292-0.2927.7%
Standard downs-0.327-1.3107.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Daniel Anderson · RBUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA -0.261 · Total -1.568
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.261-1.5684.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.261-1.5687.4%
1st down-0.477-1.4304.8%
2nd down-0.046-0.1387.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.669-3.3465.3%
Passing downs1.7791.7792.7%
Ricky Ahumaraeze · WRUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.371 · Total 4.077
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3714.0773.5%
Pass0.3714.0779.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.087-0.5243.9%
2nd down0.8750.8751.0%
3rd down0.9323.7267.1%
Standard downs0.1481.0353.1%
Passing downs0.7613.0434.6%
Hayden Eligon Ii · WRUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.498 · Total 5.483
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4985.4833.4%
Pass0.4985.4838.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.123-0.6173.1%
2nd down2.6465.2932.0%
3rd down0.2020.8086.8%
Standard downs-0.123-0.6172.2%
Passing downs1.0176.1016.3%
Sean Morris II · RBUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.744 · Total 2.231
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7442.2312.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.7442.2314.3%
1st down-0.530-0.5301.6%
2nd down0.7520.7522.8%
3rd down2.0092.0094.5%
Standard downs-0.530-0.5301.1%
Passing downs1.3802.7606.1%
Nicco Marchiol · QBUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.383 · Total 1.149
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3831.1492.3%
Pass-1.081-1.0812.1%
Rush1.1152.2302.5%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.3831.14913.6%
Standard downs1.2021.2021.1%
Passing downs-0.027-0.0535.4%
Ryan Boe · QBUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA 0.375 · Total 0.375
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3750.3751.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3750.3753.3%
1st down0.3750.3753.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3750.3752.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Robby Preckel · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -1.967 · Total -9.836
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.967-9.8361.5%
Pass-2.342-9.3683.1%
Rush-0.469-0.4690.5%
1st down-0.245-0.4891.2%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-1.081-1.0811.7%
Standard downs-1.580-4.7411.3%
Passing downs-2.548-5.0962.1%
Frank Covey IV · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.752 · Total -0.752
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.752-0.7521.3%
Pass-0.752-0.7524.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.752-0.7522.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.752-0.7521.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Northwestern sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.325 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.494 (92nd percentile; 138 teams)92ndOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.342 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.465 (93rd percentile; 138 teams)93rdOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.223 (88th percentile; 138 teams)88thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.022 (70th percentile; 138 teams)70thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.423 (35th percentile; 138 teams)35thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.132 (84th percentile; 138 teams)84thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.167 (63rd percentile; 138 teams)63rd
Values and percentiles
Northwestern metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.32596th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.49492nd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.34291st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.46593rd138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.22388th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.02270th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42335th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.13284th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16763rd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 98% of 167 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.1 yards (67th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.5 per completion. Completion 69.5%, 9.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.62.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense72.1%60.7%+11.5140 / 167
Defense allowed60.9%61.8%-0.9202 / 251

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Northwestern.

Target mix by zone, Northwestern offense
Short left32% · 52Short middle19% · 31Short right37% · 61Deep left5% · 8Deep middle3% · 5Deep right4% · 6

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Northwestern passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense16798%9.15.569.5%0.62+11.5 pp140
Passing defense251100%9.34.058.6%0.06-0.9 pp202

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2775.247.6%0.283.001.302.0017.5%74.4%
Defense allowed2334.745.7%0.123.201.001.4016.4%68.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense265 / 27725522149110250 / 252 · 99.2%
Defense allowed231 / 233230313110217 / 219 · 99.1%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +11.5 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

0.08.416.9W1W3W3 vs Colorado: +16.9 ppW4W4 vs Indiana: +16.2 ppW5W5 vs Penn State: +2.9 ppW6W6 vs Ball State: +10.5 ppW7W7 vs Michigan State: +4.2 ppW8W8 vs Rutgers: +15.3 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1South Dakota State240———11.30.66317.30.52
W3Colorado222277.3%60.4%+16.9 pp8.20.74513.30.10
W4Indiana292875.0%58.8%+16.2 pp9.90.68262.50.09
W5Penn State141471.4%68.5%+2.9 pp5.4-0.14557.50.47
W6Ball State242369.6%59.1%+10.5 pp10.41.00314.40.18
W7Michigan State292864.3%60.1%+4.2 pp8.80.41423.20.11
W8Rutgers252576.0%60.7%+15.3 pp8.30.67417.20.40

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

21 punts · 38.4 gross yards/punt · 34.3 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 21/21 punts. Known net yards: 17/21 punts.

Our punt returns

4 returns · 9.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 4/4 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Rutgers234.539.01/2
Week 7 · Michigan State346.330.73/3
Week 6 · Ball State241.046.01/2
Week 5 · Penn State242.042.02/2
Week 4 · Indiana445.036.03/4
Team style
Rating history