Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Northern Illinois

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Northern Illinois's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 135.5 across 8 systems; best 132, worst 138, so they disagree by 6 places.

Lab EPA
#135
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#138
down 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#137
down 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#132
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#134
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#136
down 5 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#137
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#135
down 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#138 of 138
Schedule strength
#74 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#92 of 138
Game control
#136 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#137 of 138
Offense
#125 of 138
Defense
#136 of 138
Special teams
#137 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Northern Illinois · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

0-7 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.199 net EPA/play

#135

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-21.35 points

#138 · Down 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -22.61 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.83, schedule #82 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.68. That is worth -26.44 on its own; the preseason prior of -5.72 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -21.35.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Northern Illinois · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Iowa
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858426
-40.00 → -35.00+2.500.76379.40%+6.88-3.0540.647-2.407
Week 2 · Illinois State
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401864503
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.79379.77%-25.00 (fixed lower division)-0.635-2.441-3.076
Week 3 · Arizona
away · 2026-09-20 · ID 401856793
-25.00 → -25.00+2.500.824910.15%+11.98-2.2831.216-1.068
Week 4 · Georgia State
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864511
-21.00 → -21.00+2.500.857210.55%-2.14-1.951-0.226-2.177
Week 6 · Air Force
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401864516
-21.00 → -21.00-2.500.925911.39%-1.75-2.677-0.200-2.877
Week 7 · Wyoming
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401864522
-18.00 → -18.00+2.500.962211.84%-8.25-1.835-0.976-2.812
Week 8 · Hawai'i
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401864526
-35.00 → -35.00-2.501.000012.30%-7.39-4.614-0.910-5.523

Game terms -19.94 points; prior term -1.41 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -21.35 points. The preseason prior is -5.72 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-25.4 SP+ points

#137 · Down 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-22.75 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#136 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -7.38 on 286 plays; defense 15.37 on 341 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Northern Illinois 3 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
0-7 · conf 0-3 · home 0-3 · away 0-4 · expected wins 0.5
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 1-6 ATS (-9.7 avg) · 2025: 3-9 ATS (-3.5 avg)
Head coach
Rob Harley · hired 2026-02-18 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #99 (150 pts) · 2025 #84 (164 pts) · 2026 #82 (185 pts)
Returning
44% of production · 47% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing138%44%
Receiving93%70%
Rushing29%40%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back92.890.83687.53
Defensive Line172.940.829714.11
Linebacker72.860.83735.86
Offensive Line202.950.825016.50
Quarterback53.000.83404.17
Receiver192.890.822515.63
Running Back53.000.83944.20
Special Teams93.000.82377.41

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Taron Dickens · QB

CFBD athlete 4881032. Northern Illinois (2026–2026); Western Carolina (2023–2025)

Passing WEPA0.21120258.4%
Pass 91.1% · Rush 15.4%

1st 55.8% · 2nd 53.2% · 3rd 71.9%

Standard downs 52.9% · Passing downs 68.9%

2023: 3★ · 0.8156
Telly Johnson Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5193302. Northern Illinois (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2067224.0%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 52.0%

1st 24.2% · 2nd 30.9% · 3rd 13.5%

Standard downs 27.0% · Passing downs 18.2%

2024: 3★ · 0.8163
JJ Schlenhardt · PK

CFBD athlete 5265497. Northern Illinois (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-1.0908—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: stars unavailable
Afy Ibekwe · WR

CFBD athlete 5264660. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 6.9%

Not linked
Brady Davidson · QB

CFBD athlete 5210128. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.8%
Pass 13.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 17.9%

Not linked
Cam Thompson · WR

CFBD athlete 5083748. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.3%
Pass 12.0% · Rush 0.7%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 9.0%

Not linked
DeAree Rogers · WR

CFBD athlete 5296150. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——16.2%
Pass 28.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 13.2% · 2nd 15.8% · 3rd 21.3%

Standard downs 13.5% · Passing downs 21.6%

Not linked
Elijah Porter · RB

CFBD athlete 5219932. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.2%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 18.3%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 10.8% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 10.7% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
George Dimopoulos · WR

CFBD athlete 5193277. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 7.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Glen Weber · TE

CFBD athlete 5388937. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 1.5%

Not linked
Jaidaun Cranford · RB

CFBD athlete 5291180. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 1.4%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 0.8%

Not linked
Jalen Macon · QB

CFBD athlete 4884086. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.6%
Pass 14.4% · Rush 8.6%

1st 12.0% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 20.9%

Standard downs 9.2% · Passing downs 16.2%

Not linked
Jason Fowler · TE

CFBD athlete 5219946. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 4.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 4.7%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 1.5%

Not linked
Joe Stein · TE

CFBD athlete 5193285. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Kelan McInerney · WR

CFBD athlete 5388929. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Kenji Lewis · WR

CFBD athlete 5084310. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.3% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 4.4%

Standard downs 0.8% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
La'Don Bryant · WR

CFBD athlete 5193292. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 16.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 11.1% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 11.2%

Standard downs 9.3% · Passing downs 10.1%

Not linked
Liam Russo · TE

CFBD athlete 5215176. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Rickey Taylor Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5219936. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.3%
Pass 15.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 15.4% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 12.5% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Triston White · RB

CFBD athlete 5214939. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 8.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Zaire McKinney · WR

CFBD athlete 5302862. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 10.7%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 7 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Avery Jones · SLafayette2026-01-083★ / 0.8400Immediate
Chevy Trask Jr. · OTSouth Carolina State2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Daine Hanson · OTNot reported2026-04-27— / —Immediate
Mathias Davis · EDGENot reported2025-12-153★ / 0.8000Immediate
Mathias Smith-Davis · EDGENot reported2025-12-15— / —Immediate
Taron Dickens · QBWestern Carolina2026-02-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyrese Stanley · SMorehouse2025-11-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 22 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Abiathar Curry · OTNot reported2025-12-283★ / —Immediate
Daniel Vuckovic · PArkansas State2026-01-14— / —Immediate
DeAree Rogers · WRNot reported2025-12-013★ / 0.8600Immediate
Evan Malcore · OTMiami (OH)2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Filip Maciorowski · LBCincinnati2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Gary Givens III · WRNot reported2025-12-25— / —Immediate
Ivan Moore Jr. · EDGESacramento State2026-01-203★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jackson Proctor · QBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Jacob Finley · CBCincinnati2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jake Appleget · TEFresno State2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
James Finley IV · SIllinois2026-03-254★ / 0.9000Immediate
Jasper Beeler · SCincinnati2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaylen Poe · RBGeorgia State2026-01-183★ / 0.8300Immediate
Lance Ingold · EDGEIowa2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Marc Pretto · LBColorado State2026-01-213★ / 0.8400Immediate
Mark Hensley · DLMissouri2026-03-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Jimmar · OTNot reported2025-12-253★ / —Immediate
Miles Thompson · CBNot reported2025-12-243★ / —Immediate
Reggie Jean · DLCoastal Carolina2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
Tanner Rinderknecht · IOLNot reported2026-01-052★ / —Immediate
Taylor Powell · SFresno State2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Thomas McCoy · WRNot reported2025-12-30— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Northern Illinois. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Rob Harley · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 13 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Rob Harley · interim · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2026-02-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2019–2025 · Thomas Hammock

    35–47 · 82 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2019-01-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2012–2018 · Rod Carey

    52–30 · 82 attributed games · 7 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2012-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2011–2012 · Dave Doeren

    23–4 · 27 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2010-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2008–2010 · Jerry Kill

    23–16 · 39 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2007-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1996–2007 · Joe Novak

    63–76 · 139 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1991–1995 · Charlie Sadler

    18–37 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1985–1990 · Jerry Pettibone

    33–32–1 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1984–1984 · Lee Corso

    4–6–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1980–1983 · Bill Mallory

    25–19 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1976–1979 · Pat Culpepper

    14–29–1 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1971–1975 · Jerry Ippoliti

    25–29–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1969–1970 · Doc Urich

    6–14 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Rob Harley · incomplete attribution0–0——-25-23.982—
2025 · Thomas Hammock3–92–60–0-16.7-17.284—
2024 · Thomas Hammock8–54–41–0-3.5-1.199—
2023 · Thomas Hammock7–65–31–0-7.5-8.8103—
2022 · Thomas Hammock3–92–60–0-18.8-1587—
2021 · Thomas Hammock9–57–20–1-7.1-691—
2020 · Thomas Hammock0–60–60–0-18.4—91—
2019 · Thomas Hammock5–74–40–0-13.9-14.5108—
2018 · Rod Carey8–67–20–1-2.7-4.593—
2017 · Rod Carey8–56–20–1-1.4-0.197—
2016 · Rod Carey5–75–30–0-2.4-3.2112—
2015 · Rod Carey8–66–30–1-0.9-0.183—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:28:31 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play134 / 1382.9129 / 1386.6
Success rate121 / 13812.4136 / 1381.5
Explosiveness85 / 13838.759 / 13857.7
Standard-down success108 / 13821.9135 / 1382.2
Passing-down success123 / 13810.9132 / 1384.4
Pass PPA121 / 13812.4117 / 13815.3
Rush PPA127 / 1388.0134 / 1382.9
Pass explosiveness111 / 13819.767 / 13851.8
Rush explosiveness79 / 13843.187 / 13837.2
Line yards66 / 13852.6130 / 1385.8
Second-level yards41 / 13870.8128 / 1387.3
Open-field yards115 / 13816.8114 / 13817.5
Stuff rate106 / 13823.4122 / 13811.7
Power successT62 / 13855.193 / 13832.8
HavocT107 / 13821.9138 / 1380.0
Front-seven havoc122 / 13811.7137 / 1380.7
DB havocT62 / 13853.6T132 / 1383.6
Points / opportunityT132 / 1384.0133 / 1383.6
Average field positionT118 / 13813.9107 / 13822.6
Field-position expected points122 / 13811.7115 / 13816.8

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Taron Dickens · QBUsage 58.4% · Avg PPA 0.030 · Total 7.770
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0307.77058.4%
Pass0.09020.41291.1%
Rush-0.231-6.23415.4%
1st down-0.032-3.38555.8%
2nd down-0.039-2.86953.2%
3rd down0.37524.00471.9%
Standard downs-0.109-16.68452.9%
Passing downs0.24024.45468.9%
Telly Johnson Jr. · RBUsage 24.0% · Avg PPA 0.089 · Total 9.337
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0899.33724.0%
Pass0.0110.1535.6%
Rush0.1019.18452.0%
1st down-0.015-0.69924.2%
2nd down0.0934.02030.9%
3rd down0.2122.54013.5%
Standard downs0.0786.05127.0%
Passing downs0.1223.28618.2%
DeAree Rogers · WRUsage 16.2% · Avg PPA 0.478 · Total 33.938
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47833.93816.2%
Pass0.47833.93828.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.42710.68413.2%
2nd down0.1583.47615.8%
3rd down0.99818.95821.3%
Standard downs0.44817.45913.5%
Passing downs0.51516.47921.6%
Jalen Macon · QBUsage 11.6% · Avg PPA -0.263 · Total -6.060
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.263-6.06011.6%
Pass-0.315-5.04514.4%
Rush-0.145-1.0158.6%
1st down-0.255-2.55312.0%
2nd down-0.194-0.7746.1%
3rd down-0.304-2.73320.9%
Standard downs-0.274-3.2939.2%
Passing downs-0.252-2.76716.2%
Rickey Taylor Jr. · WRUsage 10.3% · Avg PPA 0.468 · Total 3.278
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4683.27810.3%
Pass0.4683.27815.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1850.73915.4%
2nd down-0.353-0.7069.5%
3rd down3.2453.2456.3%
Standard downs-0.003-0.01512.5%
Passing downs1.6463.2937.1%
La'Don Bryant · WRUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 4.718
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1124.7189.6%
Pass0.1124.71816.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3878.13211.1%
2nd down0.4333.0315.0%
3rd down0.2022.02311.2%
Standard downs0.0060.1529.3%
Passing downs0.3044.56610.1%
Elijah Porter · RBUsage 9.2% · Avg PPA -0.212 · Total -8.465
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.212-8.4659.2%
Pass-0.236-1.8923.2%
Rush-0.205-6.57318.3%
1st down-0.044-0.7568.9%
2nd down-0.094-1.41610.8%
3rd down0.1921.1546.7%
Standard downs-0.271-8.38710.7%
Passing downs-0.009-0.0786.1%
Brady Davidson · QBUsage 8.8% · Avg PPA 0.225 · Total 1.349
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2251.3498.8%
Pass0.2251.34913.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.921-0.9213.8%
2nd down-0.362-0.7239.5%
3rd down-0.174-0.34812.5%
Standard downs-0.921-0.9212.5%
Passing downs0.4542.27017.9%
Cam Thompson · WRUsage 7.3% · Avg PPA 0.238 · Total 6.434
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2386.4347.3%
Pass0.2877.45612.0%
Rush-1.022-1.0220.7%
1st down0.5565.0055.6%
2nd down-0.362-3.6208.5%
3rd down0.6315.04810.7%
Standard downs0.3154.7256.3%
Passing downs0.1421.7099.0%
Zaire McKinney · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.755 · Total 2.264
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7552.2644.4%
Pass0.7552.2646.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.362-0.7239.5%
3rd down2.9872.9876.3%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.7552.26410.7%
George Dimopoulos · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.320 · Total 5.114
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3205.1144.3%
Pass0.3205.1147.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0680.4754.3%
2nd down0.7775.4385.9%
3rd down-0.399-0.7982.7%
Standard downs0.2763.0324.4%
Passing downs0.4162.0824.2%
Afy Ibekwe · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.173 · Total 0.519
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1730.5194.1%
Pass0.1730.5196.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.125-1.1253.1%
2nd down-1.061-1.0614.0%
3rd down2.7042.7047.1%
Standard downs-1.125-1.1252.2%
Passing downs0.8221.6436.9%
Triston White · RBUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA -0.299 · Total -0.599
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.299-0.5993.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.299-0.5998.0%
1st down-0.388-0.3884.5%
2nd down-0.211-0.2115.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.388-0.3883.0%
Passing downs-0.211-0.2114.0%
Jason Fowler · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.110 · Total -0.657
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.110-0.6572.9%
Pass-0.110-0.6574.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1140.3423.4%
2nd down-0.649-0.6491.5%
3rd down-0.175-0.3504.7%
Standard downs-0.175-0.8743.6%
Passing downs0.2160.2161.5%
Kelan McInerney · WRUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.527 · Total 4.746
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5274.7462.8%
Pass0.5274.7464.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.516-1.5472.1%
2nd down0.2980.8942.8%
3rd down1.7995.3984.5%
Standard downs-0.566-2.2652.0%
Passing downs1.4027.0114.1%
Jaidaun Cranford · RBUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.376 · Total 3.384
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3763.3842.7%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3763.3847.0%
1st down0.6413.8494.2%
2nd down-0.591-1.1831.8%
3rd down0.7180.7181.4%
Standard downs0.4833.8633.7%
Passing downs-0.479-0.4790.8%
Liam Russo · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.168 · Total 0.504
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1680.5042.1%
Pass0.1680.5043.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9100.9101.7%
2nd down-0.821-0.8212.3%
3rd down0.4150.4153.4%
Standard downs0.9100.9101.1%
Passing downs-0.203-0.4073.7%
Glen Weber · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.045 · Total -0.180
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.045-0.1802.0%
Pass-0.045-0.1803.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.084-0.0841.2%
2nd down-0.032-0.0974.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.105-0.3142.3%
Passing downs0.1340.1341.5%
Kenji Lewis · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.581 · Total -2.324
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.581-2.3242.0%
Pass-0.581-2.3243.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.163-0.1631.3%
2nd down-1.006-1.0061.5%
3rd down-0.577-1.1554.4%
Standard downs-0.163-0.1630.8%
Passing downs-0.720-2.1613.7%
Joe Stein · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 1.025 · Total 1.025
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0251.0251.5%
Pass1.0251.0252.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0251.0253.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.0251.0252.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Northern Illinois sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.054 (3rd percentile; 138 teams)3rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.380 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.209 (39th percentile; 138 teams)39thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.042 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.062 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.247 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.505 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.204 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.093 (0th percentile; 138 teams)0th
Values and percentiles
Northern Illinois metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0543rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.38012th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.20939th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.04212th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.0628th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.2477th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.5051st138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.20458th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.0930th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 229 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.8 yards (57th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.3 per completion. Completion 64.2%, 6.2 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.15.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.9%60.5%+1.5197 / 229
Defense allowed68.7%59.6%+9.1147 / 180

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Northern Illinois.

Target mix by zone, Northern Illinois offense
Short left35% · 78Short middle17% · 37Short right34% · 75Deep left7% · 16Deep middle3% · 6Deep right4% · 8

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Northern Illinois passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense22999%8.84.364.2%0.15+1.5 pp197
Passing defense18097%9.15.371.1%0.32+9.1 pp147

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense1983.442.0%-0.043.101.200.8017.8%74.1%
Defense allowed2865.353.9%0.283.401.201.5011.2%74.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense192 / 198191723110171 / 174 · 98.3%
Defense allowed279 / 28626818811110266 / 267 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.5 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-7.7-0.56.7W1W1 vs Iowa: -7.7 ppW2W3W3 vs Arizona: +6.1 ppW4W4 vs Georgia State: +6.7 ppW6W6 vs Air Force: +3.0 ppW7W7 vs Wyoming: -3.5 ppW8W8 vs Hawai'i: +1.4 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Iowa242454.2%61.8%-7.7 pp9.90.02310.2-0.45
W2Illinois State300———3.5-0.03363.1-0.01
W3Arizona434266.7%60.6%+6.1 pp8.50.32243.60.06
W4Georgia State424165.9%59.1%+6.7 pp8.50.19313.30.04
W6Air Force202065.0%62.0%+3.0 pp9.5-0.00234.9-0.22
W7Wyoming444454.5%58.0%-3.5 pp11.20.06296.20.58
W8Hawai'i262665.4%64.0%+1.4 pp9.30.39243.6-0.35

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

33 punts · 42.4 gross yards/punt · 35.8 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 32/33 punts. Known net yards: 28/33 punts.

Our punt returns

6 returns · 7.2 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 6/6 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Hawai'i446.841.33/4
Week 7 · Wyoming450.544.54/4
Week 6 · Air Force242.552.01/2
Week 4 · Georgia State434.533.33/4
Week 3 · Arizona334.034.02/3
Team style
Rating history