Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

New Mexico State

2026 season

Conference USA
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

New Mexico State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 111 across 8 systems; best 106, worst 119, so they disagree by 13 places.

Lab EPA
#106
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#106
up 42026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#119
up 52026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#115
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#114
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#108
up 6 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#114
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#106
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#107 of 138
Schedule strength
#98 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#117 of 138
Game control
#111 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#110 of 138
Offense
#124 of 138
Defense
#57 of 138
Special teams
#132 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

New Mexico State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.092 net EPA/play

#106

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-6.78 points

#106 · Up 4 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -0.87 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.14, schedule #104 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.39. That is worth -7.01 on its own; the preseason prior of -6.10 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -6.78.

How each game enters this SRS rating

New Mexico State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Florida State
away · 2026-08-29 · ID 401864570
-17.00 → -17.00+2.500.76379.55%+6.69-1.3850.639-0.746
Week 1 · Mercyhurst
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401870790
+37.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.55%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.104-2.3880.716
Week 2 · Hawai'i
away · 2026-09-13 · ID 401864578
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.79379.93%-7.39-0.745-0.734-1.478
Week 4 · New Mexico
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864579
-24.00 → -24.00-2.500.857210.72%+8.10-2.8410.869-1.972
Week 5 · Western Kentucky
home · 2026-10-02 · ID 401871049
+21.00 → +21.00-2.500.890911.14%-7.942.061-0.8851.176
Week 6 · Florida International
away · 2026-10-07 · ID 401871066
-19.00 → -19.00+2.500.925911.58%-4.22-1.911-0.489-2.399
Week 8 · Sam Houston
away · 2026-10-22 · ID 401871070
+6.00 → +6.00+2.501.000012.51%-12.921.063-1.615-0.552

Game terms -5.26 points; prior term -1.53 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -6.78 points. The preseason prior is -6.10 with 25.02% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-13.4 SP+ points

#119 · Up 5 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-9.95 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#108 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -10.00 on 365 plays; defense -0.04 on 378 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA and local SRS assign the same rank at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 2-2 · home 2-2 · away 1-3 · expected wins 2.8
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (-0.4 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (+1.4 avg)
Head coach
Tony Sanchez · hired 2023-12-23 · 7-17 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #134 (68 pts) · 2025 #126 (97 pts) · 2026 #136 (129 pts)
Returning
24% of production · 30% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing40%23%
Receiving30%30%
Rushing81%42%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back43.000.82463.30
Defensive Line52.800.82044.10
Linebacker33.000.82172.46
Offensive Line82.750.81956.56
Quarterback13.000.86440.86
Receiver32.670.84072.52
Running Back13.000.86560.87
Special Teams32.670.79632.39

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Trey Hedden · QB

CFBD athlete 5224084. New Mexico State (2026–2026); Furman (2024–2025)

Passing WEPA0.26610842.6%
Pass 72.4% · Rush 8.3%

1st 34.0% · 2nd 44.3% · 3rd 57.6%

Standard downs 35.9% · Passing downs 56.5%

2024: 3★ · 0.8200
Adam Damante · QB

CFBD athlete 5152503. Arizona (2024–2024); New Mexico State (2025–2026); Northern Arizona (2023–2023)

Passing WEPA0.12010533.6%
Pass 71.6% · Rush 4.0%

1st 31.0% · 2nd 27.6% · 3rd 45.5%

Standard downs 30.5% · Passing downs 40.2%

2023: 2★ · 0.7900
James Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5220253. New Mexico State (2026–2026); Delaware State (2025–2025); UL Monroe (2024–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.17510328.5%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 54.8%

1st 34.2% · 2nd 30.4% · 3rd 16.3%

Standard downs 33.3% · Passing downs 18.5%

2024: stars unavailable
Terrell Washington Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5076584. New Mexico State (2026–2026); Iowa (2023–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.0824515.4%
Pass 7.6% · Rush 24.2%

1st 15.8% · 2nd 17.3% · 3rd 13.5%

Standard downs 16.0% · Passing downs 14.3%

2023: 3★ · 0.8633
Ilya Uvaydov · PK

CFBD athlete 5088938. New Mexico State (2026–2026); Utah Tech (2022–2022); Utah Tech (2024–2025)

Kicker PAAR0.6607—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2022: stars unavailable
Kyah Francone · PK

CFBD athlete 5295467. New Mexico State (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-2.1003—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
AJ Williams III · WR

CFBD athlete 5295460. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 12.9% · Rush 0.4%

1st 7.0% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 10.1%

Not linked
Brodrick Malone · WR

CFBD athlete 5207657. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 11.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 13.3%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 9.2%

Not linked
Carson Su'esu'e · TE

CFBD athlete 5296210. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 0.6% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Dijon Stanley · RB

CFBD athlete 4922995. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.7%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 9.0%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 7.0% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Isaiah Rudison · RB

CFBD athlete 5159150. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.5%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Jalen Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 5120866. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 0.8% · Rush 4.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Jaylen Stokes · WR

CFBD athlete 5384719. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jerry Lydiatt · TE

CFBD athlete 5159145. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 2.5%

Not linked
Josiah Thomas · TE

CFBD athlete 5301984. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 11.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 11.7%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
Lyndon Ravare · WR

CFBD athlete 5219270. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.4%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 1.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked
Myles Libman · WR

CFBD athlete 5156057. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
TJ Pride · WR

CFBD athlete 5220785. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 7.6%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 6.6%

Not linked
Terrione Graves · WR

CFBD athlete 5295457. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 1.2% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked
Tyler King · WR

CFBD athlete 4869443. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.0%
Pass 21.8% · Rush 0.5%

1st 10.0% · 2nd 11.5% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 10.4% · Passing downs 12.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 25 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amaurey Brooks · CBFordham2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Armond Owens · IOLGrambling2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brody Richter · PMinnesota2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Carson Su'esu'e · TEOklahoma State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
De'Marcus Peters · CBTexas A&M-Kingsville2025-12-033★ / 0.8200Immediate
Devin Ellison · WRWashington State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ilya Uvaydov · KUtah Tech2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Izzy Clark-White · CBMonmouth2026-01-11— / —Immediate
James Jones · RBDelaware State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
James Williams · IOLUTEP2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Javon Gillespie · CBEast Texas A&M2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jeremiah Sandiford · DLTennessee Tech2026-01-213★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jordan-Lebron Downey · DLLivingstone2025-12-033★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josiah Thomas · TEWestern Carolina2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Kaian Roberts-Day · DLUTSA2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Luke Moise · IOLWofford2026-01-163★ / 0.8200Immediate
Lyndon Ravare · WRKennesaw State2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mark Chapman · IOLColumbia2026-01-123★ / 0.8200Immediate
Myles Libman · WRStanford2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
RJ Chapman · SMerrimack2026-01-21— / —Immediate
Rayfield Lotten · TESam Houston2026-01-213★ / 0.8200Immediate
TJ Washington Jr. · RBIowa2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tayden Barnes · SCincinnati2026-01-213★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tyler Keinath · IOLBoise State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Vic Shaw · EDGEUTSA2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 24 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Parks · TEWestern Michigan2026-01-122★ / 0.7900Immediate
Armahn Hale · SBowling Green2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Armando Nieves · OTSouth Carolina2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
BJ Tolo · IOLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
DJ Hill-Smith · SNot reported2025-12-053★ / —Immediate
Dakerric Hobbs · CBNot reported2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Donovan Faupel · WRArkansas2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Elijah Harvey · OTNot reported2025-12-04— / —Immediate
Ezra Christensen · DLColorado2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gavin Harris · TEGeorgia Tech2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Owens · WRNot reported2026-01-022★ / —Immediate
Jaylen Patterson · QBSacramento State2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kai Wheeler · IOLNot reported2025-12-12— / —Immediate
Lanar Kelley Jr. · SNot reported2025-12-03— / —Immediate
Larry Jones III · EDGEStephen F. Austin2026-02-023★ / —Immediate
Lukas Ungar · TEVirginia2026-01-263★ / 0.8500Immediate
Max Dean · PWashington State2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Naeten Mitchell · SColorado2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Parker Awad · QBChattanooga2026-02-04— / —Immediate
Quincy Davis · LBKansas2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Stilton McKelvey · CBBaylor2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Ta'Avili Tuitama · DLNot reported2025-12-31— / —Immediate
Tory Gethers · LBNot reported2026-01-273★ / 0.8400Withdrawn
Tyler Martinez · LBColorado2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at New Mexico State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Tony Sanchez · career 27–57 across 8 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 20 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Tony Sanchez · active at capture

    7–17 · 24 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2022–2023 · Jerry Kill

    17–11 · 28 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2021-11-24. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2013–2021 · Doug Martin

    25–74 · 99 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Hired 2013-02-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2009–2012 · DeWayne Walker

    10–40 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2008-12-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2005–2008 · Hal Mumme

    11–38 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1997–2004 · Tony Samuel

    34–57 · 91 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1990–1996 · Jim Hess

    22–55 · 77 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1986–1989 · Mike Knoll

    4–40 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1983–1985 · Fred Zechman

    8–25 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1978–1982 · Gil Krueger

    17–37–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1973–1977 · Jim Bradley

    23–31–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1968–1972 · Jim Wood

    21–30–1 · 52 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1958–1967 · Warren Woodson

    63–36–3 · 102 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1955–1957 · Tony Cavallo

    7–23 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1953–1954 · James Patton

    2–16 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1951–1952 · Joe Coleman

    3–15–1 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1948–1950 · Vaughn Corley

    9–20 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1946–1947 · Raymond Curfman

    8–11 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1940–1942 · Julius Johnston

    6–21 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1931–1939 · Gerald Hines

    46–31–7 · 84 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Tony Sanchez · incomplete attribution0–0——-14.5-11.8136—
2025 · Tony Sanchez4–82–60–0-15.5-16.1126—
2024 · Tony Sanchez3–92–60–0-19-22.1134—
2023 · Jerry Kill10–57–20–1-1.8-3113—
2022 · Jerry Kill7–62–01–0-15.4-11.6108—
2021 · Doug Martin2–100–00–0-24.2-20.6114—
2020 · Doug Martin1–10–00–0-31.5—132—
2019 · Doug Martin2–100–00–0-22-20120—
2018 · Doug Martin3–90–00–0-20.2-21.7125—
2017 · Doug Martin7–64–41–0-9.4-11.2129—
2016 · Doug Martin3–92–60–0-17.2-18.6128—
2015 · Doug Martin3–93–50–0-18.6-22.3125—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:18:03 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play123 / 13810.946 / 13867.2
Success rate97 / 13829.945 / 13867.9
Explosiveness24 / 13883.267 / 13851.8
Standard-down success109 / 13821.236 / 13874.5
Passing-down success62 / 13855.572 / 13848.2
Pass PPA118 / 13814.629 / 13879.6
Rush PPA88 / 13836.558 / 13858.4
Pass explosiveness28 / 13880.343 / 13869.3
Rush explosiveness36 / 13874.564 / 13854.0
Line yards69 / 13850.426 / 13881.8
Second-level yards63 / 13854.745 / 13867.9
Open-field yards38 / 13873.080 / 13842.3
Stuff rate32 / 13877.421 / 13885.4
Power successT40 / 13870.8131 / 1385.1
HavocT101 / 13826.6T76 / 13844.5
Front-seven havocT59 / 13855.8T42 / 13869.0
DB havocT126 / 1388.4T112 / 13818.6
Points / opportunityT95 / 13831.093 / 13832.8
Average field position111 / 13819.7T128 / 1386.9
Field-position expected points105 / 13824.1130 / 1385.8

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Trey Hedden · QBUsage 42.6% · Avg PPA 0.032 · Total 4.576
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0324.57642.6%
Pass0.21126.57672.4%
Rush-0.717-8.6068.3%
1st down0.0060.31034.0%
2nd down-0.618-29.02944.3%
3rd down1.00538.17157.6%
Standard downs-0.285-22.76935.9%
Passing downs0.44827.34556.5%
Adam Damante · QBUsage 33.1% · Avg PPA -0.070 · Total -7.617
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.070-7.61733.1%
Pass-0.122-12.45868.5%
Rush0.6914.8404.2%
1st down-0.156-7.00930.2%
2nd down0.1273.67828.2%
3rd down0.2577.44146.0%
Standard downs-0.084-5.81430.1%
Passing downs-0.045-1.80340.0%
James Jones · RBUsage 27.4% · Avg PPA 0.214 · Total 27.192
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21427.19227.4%
Pass0.3062.7553.9%
Rush0.20724.43753.9%
1st down0.14310.03033.5%
2nd down0.28412.22329.1%
3rd down0.2162.58713.3%
Standard downs0.18819.15632.1%
Passing downs0.3218.03617.1%
Terrell Washington Jr. · RBUsage 14.4% · Avg PPA 0.034 · Total 2.304
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0342.30414.4%
Pass0.2483.9677.0%
Rush-0.033-1.66323.3%
1st down0.1263.90414.8%
2nd down-0.100-2.50916.9%
3rd down0.5075.06711.1%
Standard downs-0.073-3.51815.1%
Passing downs0.3065.82213.0%
Tyler King · WRUsage 11.0% · Avg PPA -0.149 · Total -7.623
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.149-7.62311.0%
Pass-0.143-7.13621.8%
Rush-0.487-0.4870.5%
1st down0.2815.90810.0%
2nd down-0.548-9.30911.5%
3rd down1.20710.86410.0%
Standard downs-0.144-4.75910.4%
Passing downs-0.159-2.86412.3%
AJ Williams III · WRUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.508 · Total 14.229
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.50814.2296.0%
Pass0.70018.90311.8%
Rush-4.674-4.6740.5%
1st down0.5276.8486.2%
2nd down-1.180-4.7202.7%
3rd down1.10012.10112.2%
Standard downs0.5276.8484.1%
Passing downs0.4927.38110.3%
Josiah Thomas · TEUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.673 · Total 15.479
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.67315.4795.8%
Pass0.67315.47911.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0930.9285.6%
2nd down1.0264.1053.1%
3rd down1.16110.44611.7%
Standard downs0.3474.8645.3%
Passing downs1.17910.6156.8%
Dijon Stanley · RBUsage 5.7% · Avg PPA -0.140 · Total -2.659
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.140-2.6595.7%
Pass-0.822-4.1122.9%
Rush0.1041.4539.7%
1st down-0.490-4.8976.8%
2nd down0.1120.6755.7%
3rd down0.5211.5644.5%
Standard downs-0.259-4.4067.6%
Passing downs0.8741.7481.9%
Brodrick Malone · WRUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.104 · Total 2.284
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1042.2845.6%
Pass0.1042.28411.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3981.9912.8%
2nd down-0.097-0.5844.7%
3rd down0.4894.89013.2%
Standard downs-0.289-3.1784.0%
Passing downs0.4975.4629.2%
Isaiah Rudison · RBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.463 · Total 1.388
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4631.3884.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.4631.3887.5%
1st down-0.346-0.3463.3%
2nd down0.3430.3434.8%
3rd down1.3911.3917.7%
Standard downs0.5231.0453.8%
Passing downs0.3430.3437.1%
Myles Libman · WRUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.531 · Total 7.436
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5317.4363.5%
Pass0.5317.4367.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0860.4322.7%
2nd down0.4792.3933.9%
3rd down0.5211.5623.8%
Standard downs0.4293.8603.2%
Passing downs0.7153.5774.0%
TJ Pride · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.225 · Total 2.479
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2252.4793.2%
Pass0.2252.4796.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.575-1.7251.9%
2nd down-0.224-0.6722.8%
3rd down0.9754.8767.6%
Standard downs-0.077-0.3081.7%
Passing downs0.3982.7886.6%
Lyndon Ravare · WRUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.493 · Total 5.920
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4935.9202.6%
Pass0.5896.4824.8%
Rush-0.562-0.5620.5%
1st down0.2281.1392.4%
2nd down0.4572.2863.4%
3rd down0.4030.4031.1%
Standard downs0.3242.9132.8%
Passing downs1.0023.0072.1%
Jalen Brown · RBUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.627 · Total 3.764
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6273.7642.3%
Pass-0.722-0.7220.8%
Rush0.8974.4864.0%
1st down0.5811.7422.6%
2nd down0.6742.0223.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5811.7421.6%
Passing downs0.6742.0223.8%
Jerry Lydiatt · TEUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA -0.764 · Total -4.583
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.764-4.5832.2%
Pass-0.764-4.5834.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.303-0.6061.6%
2nd down0.1830.3652.3%
3rd down-0.063-0.0631.9%
Standard downs-0.865-3.4592.1%
Passing downs-0.562-1.1242.5%
Terrione Graves · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 2.886 · Total 11.546
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.88611.5462.0%
Pass2.88611.5464.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down3.3536.7052.3%
2nd down1.3531.3531.6%
3rd down3.4873.4872.6%
Standard downs2.6868.0582.2%
Passing downs3.4873.4871.6%
Carson Su'esu'e · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.262 · Total -1.049
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.262-1.0491.5%
Pass-0.262-1.0493.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.108-1.1080.9%
2nd down-0.004-0.0072.4%
3rd down0.0670.0671.9%
Standard downs-1.108-1.1080.6%
Passing downs0.0200.0593.3%
Jaylen Stokes · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.141 · Total -0.281
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.141-0.2811.5%
Pass-0.141-0.2812.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.4191.4191.8%
2nd down-1.700-1.7002.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.141-0.2812.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where New Mexico State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.004 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.407 (30th percentile; 138 teams)30thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.317 (83rd percentile; 138 teams)83rdOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.060 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.062 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.029 (67th percentile; 138 teams)67thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.383 (68th percentile; 138 teams)68thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.214 (52nd percentile; 138 teams)52ndDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.154 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45th
Values and percentiles
New Mexico State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.00411th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40730th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.31783rd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.06015th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.06236th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.02967th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.38368th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.21452nd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15445th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 96% of 245 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.6 yards (76th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.3 per completion. Completion 54.7%, 6.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA -0.01.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense52.8%60.7%-7.9216 / 245
Defense allowed63.9%62.9%+0.9202 / 237

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is New Mexico State.

Target mix by zone, New Mexico State offense
Short left26% · 58Short middle24% · 52Short right35% · 78Deep left1% · 3Deep middle5% · 12Deep right8% · 18

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
New Mexico State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense24596%9.64.354.7%-0.01-7.9 pp216
Passing defense23795%7.46.062.4%0.13+0.9 pp202

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2634.844.7%0.153.201.101.4012.2%76.7%
Defense allowed2814.042.3%0.132.801.001.2020.0%81.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense260 / 263255812450242 / 246 · 98.4%
Defense allowed272 / 2812671417441258 / 260 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -7.9 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-30.0-14.21.5W1W1 vs Florida State: +1.5 ppW1W2W2 vs Hawai'i: -7.2 ppW4W4 vs New Mexico: +1.5 ppW5W5 vs Western Kentucky: -8.0 ppW6W6 vs Florida International: -26.2 ppW8W8 vs Sam Houston: -0.6 ppW9W9 vs Jacksonville State: -30.0 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Florida State434259.5%58.0%+1.5 pp11.50.30222.7-0.07
W1Mercyhurst230———16.60.89415.40.25
W2Hawai'i363652.8%60.0%-7.2 pp11.6-0.09314.10.09
W4New Mexico393860.5%59.0%+1.5 pp8.40.30314.70.04
W5Western Kentucky262454.2%62.2%-8.0 pp7.3-0.24346.10.27
W6Florida International303036.7%62.9%-26.2 pp7.4-0.54283.80.11
W8Sam Houston292763.0%63.6%-0.6 pp7.1-0.13424.80.06
W9Jacksonville State191931.6%61.6%-30.0 pp7.4-0.94345.80.31

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

30 punts · 40.9 gross yards/punt · 39.6 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 0 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 29/30 punts. Known net yards: 26/30 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 4.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Jacksonville State242.041.02/2
Week 8 · Sam Houston641.639.45/6
Week 6 · Florida International536.236.84/5
Week 5 · Western Kentucky642.843.65/6
Week 4 · New Mexico142.018.01/1
Team style
Rating history