Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Nevada

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Nevada's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 86.5 across 8 systems; best 77, worst 96, so they disagree by 19 places.

Lab EPA
#77
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#96
up 72026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#89
up 62026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#79
up 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#94
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#84
up 4 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#95
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#79
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#117 of 138
Schedule strength
#130 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#69 of 138
Game control
#100 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#94 of 138
Offense
#111 of 138
Defense
#76 of 138
Special teams
#28 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Nevada · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.023 net EPA/play

#77

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-4.87 points

#96 · Up 7 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +4.13 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -8.61, schedule #133 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -6.18. That is worth -4.48 on its own; the preseason prior of -6.03 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -4.87.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Nevada · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Western Kentucky
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401864432
+35.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.40%-7.943.054-0.7462.307
Week 2 · Montana State
home · 2026-09-13 · ID 401864500
-13.00 → -13.00-2.500.79379.77%-25.00 (fixed lower division)-1.514-2.441-3.955
Week 3 · Middle Tennessee
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401864443
-7.00 → -7.00+2.500.824910.15%-8.22-0.457-0.834-1.291
Week 4 · Air Force
home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401864509
-3.00 → -1.00 (OT)-2.500.857210.55%-1.75-0.369-0.185-0.554
Week 6 · UTEP
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401864517
+17.00 → +17.00+2.500.925911.39%-16.912.221-1.9270.295
Week 7 · North Dakota State
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401864520
-14.00 → -14.00+2.500.962211.84%+5.92-1.3610.701-0.661
Week 8 · San José State
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401864528
+15.00 → +15.00-2.501.000012.30%-8.631.538-1.0620.476

Game terms -3.38 points; prior term -1.48 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -4.87 points. The preseason prior is -6.03 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-3.1 SP+ points

#89 · Up 6 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-4.46 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#84 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -4.34 on 362 plays; defense 0.13 on 375 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Nevada 19 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-4 · conf 2-2 · home 2-2 · away 1-2 · expected wins 3.0
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-2-1 ATS (+5.0 avg) · 2025: 5-7 ATS (+0.1 avg)
Head coach
Jeff Choate · hired 2023-12-04 · 6-19 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #127 (113 pts) · 2025 #88 (159 pts) · 2026 #98 (177 pts)
Returning
36% of production · 44% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-130%71%
Receiving41%20%
Rushing-12%39%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back102.900.82908.29
Defensive Line93.000.83887.55
Linebacker73.000.83295.83
Offensive Line162.940.821113.14
Quarterback53.000.84174.21
Receiver103.000.83508.35
Running Back73.000.83715.86
Special Teams142.930.835511.70

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Dominic Kelley · RB

CFBD athlete 5265178. Nevada (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1989827.8%
Pass 10.1% · Rush 43.1%

1st 23.8% · 2nd 34.2% · 3rd 22.3%

Standard downs 30.6% · Passing downs 22.1%

2025: 3★ · 0.8400
Carter Jones · QB

CFBD athlete 5205097. Nevada (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.1919644.6%
Pass 94.9% · Rush 14.2%

1st 41.2% · 2nd 32.5% · 3rd 75.5%

Standard downs 40.8% · Passing downs 53.2%

2025: 3★ · 0.8533
Herschel Turner · RB

CFBD athlete 5220671. Utah State (2024–2024); Nevada (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3185615.7%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 24.1%

1st 16.7% · 2nd 21.9% · 3rd 6.4%

Standard downs 17.4% · Passing downs 12.3%

2024: 3★ · 0.8500
Joe McFadden · PK

CFBD athlete 4690467. UConn (2021–2023); Nevada (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR5.49011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
AJ Bianco · QB

CFBD athlete 4819250. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——26.2%
Pass 43.7% · Rush 10.2%

1st 21.1% · 2nd 25.0% · 3rd 40.0%

Standard downs 20.7% · Passing downs 35.3%

Not linked
Carter Eck · TE

CFBD athlete 5219600. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Carter Jackson · RB

CFBD athlete 5148658. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.1%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
DJ Asiasi · TE

CFBD athlete 5216506. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 2.8%

Not linked
Damien Moun · WR

CFBD athlete 5158756. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.7%
Pass 22.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 10.0% · 2nd 6.8% · 3rd 12.8%

Standard downs 9.7% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Don Henry · WR

CFBD athlete 5388802. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Donnie Cheers · WR

CFBD athlete 5153499. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 9.5% · Rush 3.6%

1st 8.6% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 2.1%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Gary Givens III · WR

CFBD athlete 5226511. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 19.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 18.1%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Jaceon Doss · WR

CFBD athlete 5151405. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.3% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 1.4% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Janerious Jackson · RB

CFBD athlete 5388800. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.4%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Ky Woods · RB

CFBD athlete 4833591. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 1.5% · Rush 4.7%

1st 5.2% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 1.1%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Luke Duncan · QB

CFBD athlete 5077500. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——23.8%
Pass 47.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 19.8% · 2nd 19.0% · 3rd 37.8%

Standard downs 19.1% · Passing downs 32.0%

Not linked
Marshaun Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5103836. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.9%
Pass 12.5% · Rush 0.5%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 8.6%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
Reeve Slone · QB

CFBD athlete 5265060. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 2.4%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Trace Estes · TE

CFBD athlete 5219598. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 5.4%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 14 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brandon Amaniampong · EDGEIndiana State2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Chris Kalu · DLWestern New Mexico2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Donnie Cheers · WRSoutheast Missouri State2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ethan Newman · IOLMemphis2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaceon Doss · WRTowson2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Jacob Norcross · IOLMemphis2026-01-092★ / —Immediate
James Gillespie · DLSacramento State2026-01-16— / —Immediate
Jaylen Webb · SBoise State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jeremy Naborne-Owens · LBColorado State2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Jose Balver-Mendoza · OTMontana2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Joshua Scott · CBEastern Michigan2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Luke Duncan · QBUCLA2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Poasa Utu · LBOklahoma State2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Selman Bridges · CBArkansas2026-01-104★ / —Immediate
Outgoing · 21 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ailama Morton · IOLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Anthony Wolter · QBMercyhurst2026-01-123★ / 0.8000Immediate
Ashton Hayes · RBNot reported2025-12-023★ / —Immediate
Austin Harnetiaux · LBRice2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dorian Hoze · RBNot reported2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Edward Rhambo · CBNot reported2025-12-16— / —Immediate
Hadine Diaby · IOLJacksonville State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jack Foster · OTNot reported2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Withdrawn
Jackson Barton · SSan José State2026-02-013★ / 0.8100Immediate
Jett Carpenter · TETexas Tech2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jonathan Maldonado · EDGEOle Miss2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jordan Brown · WRNot reported2025-12-04— / —Immediate
Keaton Emmett · KOregon2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Nahji Logan · LBNot reported2026-01-022★ / —Immediate
Nakian Jackson · LBJames Madison2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nate Burleson II · WRNew Haven2026-01-21— / —Immediate
Nehemiah Burleson · EDGENot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Stone Combs · LBNot reported2025-12-312★ / —Immediate
Zach Cochnauer · OTNot reported2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Withdrawn
Zaiden Wallace · DLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Zedekiah Anahu-Ambrosio · WRIdaho State2026-02-013★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Nevada. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Jeff Choate · career 6–19 across 3 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 13 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Jeff Choate · active at capture

    6–19 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2022–2023 · Ken Wilson

    4–20 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2021-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2021–2021 · Vai Taua

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2017–2021 · Jay Norvell

    33–26 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2016-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2013–2016 · Brian Polian

    23–27 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2013-01-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2004–2012 · Chris Ault

    70–46 · 116 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2000–2003 · Chris Tormey

    16–31 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 1999-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1996–1999 · Jeff Tisdel

    23–22 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1994–1995 · Chris Ault

    18–5 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1993–1993 · Jeff Horton

    7–4 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1992–1992 · Chris Ault

    7–5 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1947–1950 · Joseph Sheeketski

    24–18 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1946–1946 · Jim Aiken

    7–2 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Jeff Choate · incomplete attribution0–0——-4.6-7.598—
2025 · Jeff Choate3–92–60–0-13.4-13.388—
2024 · Jeff Choate3–100–70–0-15.2-9.2127—
2023 · Ken Wilson2–102–60–0-22-17107—
2022 · Ken Wilson2–100–80–0-22.4-17.1115—
2021 · Jay Norvell · incomplete attribution8–4——3.66.386—
2021 · Vai Taua · incomplete attribution0–1——3.66.386—
2020 · Jay Norvell7–26–21–01.92.1119—
2019 · Jay Norvell7–64–40–1-12.3-12.693—
2018 · Jay Norvell8–55–31–0-0.5-3.982—
2017 · Jay Norvell3–93–50–0-16.4-9.295—
2016 · Brian Polian5–73–50–0-13-13.7105—
2015 · Brian Polian7–65–41–0-7.1-9.498—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:28:30 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play98 / 13829.285 / 13838.7
Success rate92 / 13833.634 / 13875.9
Explosiveness68 / 13851.140 / 13871.5
Standard-down success93 / 13832.845 / 13867.9
Passing-down success89 / 13835.820 / 13886.1
Pass PPA116 / 13816.167 / 13851.8
Rush PPA64 / 13854.099 / 13828.5
Pass explosiveness30 / 13878.899 / 13828.5
Rush explosiveness44 / 13868.658 / 13858.4
Line yards98 / 13829.2120 / 13813.1
Second-level yards30 / 13878.886 / 13838.0
Open-field yards44 / 13868.614 / 13890.5
Stuff rate128 / 1387.3130 / 1385.8
Power success112 / 13819.021 / 13885.4
HavocT56 / 13858.8T88 / 13835.8
Front-seven havocT42 / 13869.7T97 / 13829.6
DB havocT74 / 13844.2T54 / 13859.5
Points / opportunity46 / 13867.273 / 13847.4
Average field positionT116 / 13815.7T119 / 13813.5
Field-position expected pointsT110 / 13820.1112 / 13819.0

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Carter Jones · QBUsage 44.6% · Avg PPA 0.051 · Total 5.830
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0515.83044.6%
Pass0.0888.19494.9%
Rush-0.107-2.36314.2%
1st down-0.068-3.34641.2%
2nd down-0.081-2.19532.5%
3rd down0.34712.83275.5%
Standard downs0.0543.93640.8%
Passing downs0.0451.89453.2%
Dominic Kelley · RBUsage 27.8% · Avg PPA 0.113 · Total 14.517
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11314.51727.8%
Pass0.2545.08210.1%
Rush0.0879.43543.1%
1st down0.1748.71623.8%
2nd down0.0452.22734.2%
3rd down0.3818.01022.3%
Standard downs0.11611.01130.6%
Passing downs0.1033.50622.1%
AJ Bianco · QBUsage 26.2% · Avg PPA 0.162 · Total 11.491
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.16211.49126.2%
Pass0.1789.81643.7%
Rush0.5517.71710.2%
1st down-0.389-10.11821.1%
2nd down-0.176-3.70125.0%
3rd down1.07623.66340.0%
Standard downs-0.192-6.72220.7%
Passing downs0.50618.21335.3%
Luke Duncan · QBUsage 23.8% · Avg PPA -0.108 · Total -5.278
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.108-5.27823.8%
Pass-0.030-1.43147.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0200.35319.8%
2nd down-0.360-4.32219.0%
3rd down0.3766.38437.8%
Standard downs0.1824.53919.1%
Passing downs-0.409-9.81732.0%
Herschel Turner · RBUsage 15.7% · Avg PPA 0.352 · Total 25.694
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35225.69415.7%
Pass0.5526.6226.0%
Rush0.31319.07324.1%
1st down0.32911.52116.7%
2nd down0.2377.57721.9%
3rd down1.0996.5966.4%
Standard downs0.1739.32017.4%
Passing downs0.86216.37512.3%
Damien Moun · WRUsage 9.7% · Avg PPA -0.057 · Total -2.583
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.057-2.5839.7%
Pass-0.057-2.58322.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.117-2.46510.0%
2nd down-0.360-3.5956.8%
3rd down0.4114.93712.8%
Standard downs-0.103-3.0889.7%
Passing downs0.0340.5059.7%
Gary Givens III · WRUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.347 · Total 13.545
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.34713.5458.4%
Pass0.34713.54519.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0050.0595.7%
2nd down1.0159.1386.2%
3rd down0.4868.26618.1%
Standard downs0.0761.2865.5%
Passing downs0.55712.25914.3%
Donnie Cheers · WRUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA -0.019 · Total -0.544
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.019-0.5446.0%
Pass-0.073-1.3899.5%
Rush0.0940.8443.6%
1st down0.2714.8778.6%
2nd down-0.213-1.4884.8%
3rd down-0.079-0.1582.1%
Standard downs0.2714.8775.8%
Passing downs-0.542-5.4226.5%
Marshaun Brown · WRUsage 5.9% · Avg PPA 0.432 · Total 9.946
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4329.9465.9%
Pass0.59913.18412.5%
Rush-3.238-3.2380.5%
1st down-0.068-0.7506.3%
2nd down-0.455-2.2734.2%
3rd down1.85312.9698.6%
Standard downs-0.114-1.8216.1%
Passing downs1.68111.7675.5%
Carter Jackson · RBUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA 0.395 · Total 1.186
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3951.1865.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3951.1867.1%
1st down0.4190.4193.7%
2nd down0.3840.76710.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3951.1866.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ky Woods · RBUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.060 · Total -0.897
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.060-0.8973.2%
Pass-0.209-0.6281.5%
Rush-0.022-0.2684.7%
1st down-0.006-0.0655.2%
2nd down-0.198-0.5942.1%
3rd down-0.238-0.2381.1%
Standard downs-0.033-0.3923.9%
Passing downs-0.168-0.5041.9%
DJ Asiasi · TEUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.159 · Total 1.435
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1591.4352.7%
Pass0.1591.4356.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.641-3.2073.3%
2nd down1.1614.6423.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.086-0.5192.7%
Passing downs0.6511.9542.8%
Jaceon Doss · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.615 · Total 5.533
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6155.5332.7%
Pass0.6155.5335.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2300.4591.3%
2nd down-0.645-1.2892.0%
3rd down0.7773.1075.6%
Standard downs1.3614.0841.4%
Passing downs0.2411.4495.3%
Reeve Slone · QBUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA -2.186 · Total -4.373
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-2.186-4.3732.6%
Pass-4.618-4.6183.0%
Rush0.2450.2452.4%
1st down-4.618-4.6182.9%
2nd down0.2450.2454.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-4.618-4.6181.9%
Passing downs0.2450.2454.5%
Trace Estes · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.930 · Total 6.508
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9306.5082.6%
Pass0.9306.5086.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9741.9481.7%
2nd down0.2580.5172.4%
3rd down1.3484.0435.4%
Standard downs1.1544.6162.2%
Passing downs0.6311.8923.4%
Janerious Jackson · RBUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -1.121 · Total -1.121
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.121-1.1211.7%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-1.121-1.1212.4%
1st down-1.121-1.1213.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.121-1.1212.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Carter Eck · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.715 · Total -1.431
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.715-1.4311.5%
Pass-0.715-1.4314.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.139-1.1391.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.292-0.2924.2%
Standard downs-0.715-1.4312.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Don Henry · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 2.465 · Total 2.465
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.4652.4651.5%
Pass2.4652.4652.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.4652.4653.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs2.4652.4652.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Nevada sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.071 (29th percentile; 138 teams)29thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.409 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.242 (51st percentile; 138 teams)51stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.070 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.116 (54th percentile; 138 teams)54thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.097 (39th percentile; 138 teams)39thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.374 (76th percentile; 138 teams)76thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.171 (72nd percentile; 138 teams)72ndDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.149 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36th
Values and percentiles
Nevada metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.07129th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40934th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.24251st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.07016th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.11654th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.09739th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.37476th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.17172nd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14936th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 198 attempts charted. Average depth of target 7.9 yards (23rd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.3 per completion. Completion 56.1%, 6.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.05.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense56.5%61.7%-5.2161 / 198
Defense allowed58.0%61.5%-3.6157 / 182

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Nevada.

Target mix by zone, Nevada offense
Short left24% · 46Short middle24% · 46Short right39% · 74Deep left6% · 12Deep middle1% · 2Deep right5% · 10

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Nevada passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense198100%7.96.356.1%0.05-5.2 pp161
Passing defense18299%8.14.258.8%0.21-3.6 pp157

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2614.948.4%0.183.101.301.5018.9%65.8%
Defense allowed2914.140.7%0.153.301.000.6011.9%62.9%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense255 / 261239229880243 / 244 · 99.6%
Defense allowed283 / 2912573417441267 / 270 · 98.9%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -5.2 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-16.1-7.90.3W1W1 vs Western Kentucky: -2.5 ppW2W3W3 vs Middle Tennessee: -3.5 ppW4W4 vs Air Force: -1.9 ppW6W6 vs UTEP: -3.5 ppW7W7 vs North Dakota State: -16.1 ppW8W8 vs San José State: +0.3 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Western Kentucky161656.3%58.8%-2.5 pp10.90.23427.70.63
W2Montana State360———7.8-0.42355.20.09
W3Middle Tennessee262560.0%63.6%-3.5 pp3.50.17342.8-0.14
W4Air Force313158.1%59.9%-1.9 pp10.30.11355.30.41
W6UTEP222259.1%62.6%-3.5 pp7.80.24515.40.24
W7North Dakota State363647.2%63.3%-16.1 pp7.1-0.12214.60.08
W8San José State313161.3%60.9%+0.3 pp9.00.41432.7-0.12

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

27 punts · 43.3 gross yards/punt · 40.6 net yards/punt

4 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 27/27 punts. Known net yards: 22/27 punts.

Our punt returns

14 returns · 12.1 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 14/14 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · San José State744.942.05/7
Week 7 · North Dakota State442.042.04/4
Week 6 · UTEP443.842.33/4
Week 4 · Air Force343.045.52/3
Week 3 · Middle Tennessee236.536.52/2
Team style
Rating history