Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

NC State

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

NC State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 82 across 8 systems; best 70, worst 110, so they disagree by 40 places.

Lab EPA
#110
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#86
down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#74
up 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#75
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#70
down 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#107
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#78
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#109
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#87 of 138
Schedule strength
#67 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#62 of 138
Game control
#55 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#68 of 138
Offense
#36 of 138
Defense
#95 of 138
Special teams
#39 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

NC State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.098 net EPA/play

#110

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-2.52 points

#86 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -1.91 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -2.22, schedule #63 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +1.22. That is worth -4.13 on its own; the preseason prior of +2.33 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -2.52.

How each game enters this SRS rating

NC State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Virginia
away · 2026-08-29 · ID 401858202
-26.00 → -26.00+2.500.76379.48%+2.49-2.2280.236-1.991
Week 2 · Richmond
home · 2026-09-11 · ID 401858222
+73.00 → +35.00-2.500.79379.85%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.202-2.4630.739
Week 3 · Vanderbilt
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856695
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.824910.24%-4.45-0.154-0.456-0.609
Week 4 · App State
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864572
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.857210.64%-4.010.798-0.4270.371
Week 5 · Louisville
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858248
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.890911.06%+9.170.0551.0141.069
Week 6 · Wake Forest
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858260
-24.00 → -24.00-2.500.925911.49%+12.07-3.0461.387-1.658
Week 8 · Stanford
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858272
-3.00 → -3.00+2.501.000012.41%-7.74-0.062-0.961-1.023

Game terms -3.10 points; prior term +0.58 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -2.52 points. The preseason prior is +2.33 with 24.83% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-0.9 SP+ points

#74 · Up 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-9.91 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#107 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 1.40 on 381 plays; defense 11.31 on 366 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks NC State 24 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-4 · conf 1-3 · home 3-1 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.6
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-5 ATS (-1.6 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (+0.9 avg)
Head coach
Dave Doeren · hired 2012-12-01 · 23-16 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #27 (225 pts) · 2025 #34 (214 pts) · 2026 #49 (210 pts)
Returning
60% of production · 62% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing93%97%
Receiving26%28%
Rushing101%55%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back143.070.875212.25
Defensive Line133.000.864011.23
Linebacker113.090.86749.54
Offensive Line143.140.872212.21
Quarterback43.250.87233.49
Receiver163.310.881814.11
Running Back73.000.87196.10
Special Teams73.430.87726.14

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
CJ Bailey · QB

CFBD athlete 5079301. NC State (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.37921755.0%
Pass 93.4% · Rush 18.3%

1st 46.6% · 2nd 58.6% · 3rd 67.0%

Standard downs 44.6% · Passing downs 76.9%

2024: 4★ · 0.8933
Davion Gause · RB

CFBD athlete 5079468. NC State (2026–2026); North Carolina (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA-0.0116220.2%
Pass 11.2% · Rush 30.3%

1st 24.1% · 2nd 22.1% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 21.4% · Passing downs 17.7%

2024: 3★ · 0.8875
Jayden Scott · RB

CFBD athlete 5126513. NC State (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1275217.2%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 31.2%

1st 25.0% · 2nd 15.1% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 21.0% · Passing downs 8.7%

2024: 3★ · 0.8834
CJ Bailey · QB

CFBD athlete 5079301. NC State (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1464055.0%
Pass 93.4% · Rush 18.3%

1st 46.6% · 2nd 58.6% · 3rd 67.0%

Standard downs 44.6% · Passing downs 76.9%

2024: 4★ · 0.8933
Will Wilson · QB

CFBD athlete 5148611. NC State (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3033610.9%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 16.7%

1st 7.8% · 2nd 8.6% · 3rd 19.4%

Standard downs 14.0% · Passing downs 4.4%

2025: 3★ · 0.8811
Kanoah Vinesett · PK

CFBD athlete 5081852. NC State (2022–2026)

Kicker PAAR4.4007—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Amiri Acker · WR

CFBD athlete 5290566. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Ashton Locklear · WR

CFBD athlete 5081845. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 0.5% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Chance Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5079661. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 4.4%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Darius Johnson · RB

CFBD athlete 5159453. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 1.7% · Rush 3.2%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 1.4%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 0.9%

Not linked
Davion Dozier · WR

CFBD athlete 5080819. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 2.4%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Deandre Desinor · RB

CFBD athlete 5141409. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 5.4% · Rush 3.4%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Dylan McCoy · RB

CFBD athlete 5176079. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.1%

1st 4.9% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Hunter Provience · TE

CFBD athlete 5172608. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Isiah Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5147510. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jonathan Paylor · RB

CFBD athlete 5079659. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.7%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Joshisa Trader · WR

CFBD athlete 5079745. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 16.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.7% · 2nd 8.4% · 3rd 9.2%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Keenan Jackson · WR

CFBD athlete 5079524. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.7%
Pass 17.3% · Rush 0.4%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 12.6%

Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 12.5%

Not linked
Noah Moss · RB

CFBD athlete 5291741. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.3%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Preston Douglas · TE

CFBD athlete 5215337. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.5%
Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 6.8% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 7.5%

Not linked
Tex Vaughn · TE

CFBD athlete 5378098. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 11.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Tyran Warren · WR

CFBD athlete 5160003. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 7.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Vander Ploog · TE

CFBD athlete 5201877. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 10.5%

Not linked
Victor Snow · WR

CFBD athlete 5084967. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 9.9% · Rush 0.4%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 20 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Chance Robinson · WRMiami2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Da'Kaari Nelson · LBPenn State2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Daniel Cruz · IOLTexas2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Davion Dozier · WRApp State2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Davion Gause · RBNorth Carolina2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Harvey Dyson · EDGETulane2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hunter Provience · TEMontana State2026-01-103★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jackson Waller · PSMU2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Jai'Lun Hampton · OTUT Martin2026-02-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jimarion McCrimon · OTEast Carolina2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joshisa Trader · WRMiami2026-01-233★ / 0.8800Immediate
KaTron Evans · DLMarshall2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
King Mack · SPenn State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Ondre Evans · CBGeorgia2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Popo Aguirre · LBMiami2026-01-253★ / 0.8900Immediate
Tad Hudson · QBCoastal Carolina2026-02-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ty White · CBNorth Carolina2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyran Warren · WRAlcorn State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Vander Ploog · TEOregon2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Victor Snow · WRBuffalo2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 22 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brock Stukes · IOLSam Houston2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Christian Zachary · WRSam Houston2026-02-033★ / —Immediate
Daemon Fagan · SNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate
Darion Rivers · OTTroy2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Elijah Groves · LBSam Houston2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hollywood Smothers · RBTexas2026-01-114★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jacarrius Peak · OTSouth Carolina2026-01-094★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jivan Baly · CBOld Dominion2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josh Alexander-Felton · DLNot reported2025-12-123★ / —Immediate
Joshua Ofor · LBArkansas State2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Justin Terrell · DLSam Houston2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kelvon McBride · LBMarshall2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Kenny Soares Jr. · LBMichigan State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lex Thomas · QBNot reported2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Noah Rogers · WRAlabama2026-01-124★ / 0.9300Immediate
Odera Orizu · EDGEUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8000Immediate
Tank Boston · WRCharlotte2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Terrell Anderson · WRUSC2026-01-054★ / 0.9400Immediate
Terrente Hinton · SMarshall2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Terris Dudley · LBUConn2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Val Erickson · OTLiberty2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Zack Myers · SNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at NC State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Dave Doeren · career 118–74 across 16 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 24 appointments
  1. 2013–present · Dave Doeren · active at capture

    95–70 · 165 attributed games · 14 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2007–2012 · Tom O'Brien

    40–35 · 75 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2000–2006 · Chuck Amato

    49–37 · 86 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 1999-11-24. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1993–1999 · Mike O'Cain

    41–40 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1986–1992 · Dick Sheridan

    52–29–3 · 84 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1983–1985 · Tom Reed

    9–24 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1980–1982 · Monte Kiffin

    16–17 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1976–1979 · Bo Rein

    27–18–1 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1972–1975 · Lou Holtz

    33–12–3 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1971–1971 · Al Michaels

    3–8 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1954–1970 · Earle Edwards

    77–88–8 · 173 attributed games · 17 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1952–1953 · Horace Hendrickson

    4–16 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1944–1951 · Beattie Feathers

    37–38–3 · 78 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1940–1940 · Doc Newton

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1934–1936 · Hunk Anderson

    11–17–1 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1930–1930 · John Van Liew

    2–8 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1925–1929 · Gus Tebell

    21–25–2 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1921–1923 · Harry Hartsell

    10–16–3 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1919–1920 · William Fetzer

    14–5 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1918–1918 · Tal Stafford

    1–3 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1917–1917 · Harry Hartsell

    6–2–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1914–1915 · Jack Hegarty

    5–6–2 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1908–1908 · Mickey Whitehurst

    6–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1904–1904 · W.S. Keinholz

    3–1–2 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Dave Doeren · incomplete attribution0–0——-1-2.149—
2025 · Dave Doeren8–54–41–04.8734—
2024 · Dave Doeren6–73–50–13.9-2.127—
2023 · Dave Doeren9–46–20–17.474321
2022 · Dave Doeren8–54–40–16.85.564—
2021 · Dave Doeren9–36–20–016.113.53420
2020 · Dave Doeren8–47–30–10—41—
2019 · Dave Doeren4–81–70–0-6.3-1231—
2018 · Dave Doeren9–45–30–19.47.926—
2017 · Dave Doeren9–46–21–012.913.75323
2016 · Dave Doeren7–63–51–09.47.650—
2015 · Dave Doeren7–63–50–19.66.731—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:25:45 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play37 / 13873.7118 / 13814.6
Success rate42 / 13870.193 / 13832.8
Explosiveness70 / 13849.6118 / 13814.6
Standard-down success54 / 13861.3T88 / 13836.1
Passing-down success15 / 13889.892 / 13833.6
Pass PPA33 / 13876.6129 / 1386.6
Rush PPA69 / 13850.478 / 13843.8
Pass explosiveness69 / 13850.497 / 13829.9
Rush explosiveness82 / 13840.9111 / 13819.7
Line yards77 / 13844.557 / 13859.1
Second-level yards106 / 13823.498 / 13829.2
Open-field yards51 / 13863.5100 / 13827.7
Stuff rate51 / 13863.520 / 13886.1
Power success33 / 13876.6T80 / 13841.6
HavocT63 / 13854.0T95 / 13830.7
Front-seven havocT49 / 13864.2T120 / 13812.4
DB havocT74 / 13844.2T36 / 13873.4
Points / opportunity32 / 13877.4111 / 13819.7
Average field positionT91 / 13833.9T38 / 13871.9
Field-position expected pointsT82 / 13840.5T47 / 13866.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

CJ Bailey · QBUsage 55.0% · Avg PPA 0.323 · Total 88.127
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.32388.12755.0%
Pass0.37885.79593.4%
Rush0.1024.49518.3%
1st down0.0707.12646.6%
2nd down0.20018.98058.6%
3rd down1.03271.20167.0%
Standard downs0.10716.00544.6%
Passing downs0.58672.12176.9%
Davion Gause · RBUsage 20.2% · Avg PPA 0.046 · Total 4.114
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0464.11420.2%
Pass0.47711.43911.2%
Rush-0.111-7.32630.3%
1st down-0.210-10.09024.1%
2nd down0.1956.24322.1%
3rd down0.6836.14310.0%
Standard downs-0.075-4.84821.4%
Passing downs0.3588.96117.7%
Jayden Scott · RBUsage 17.2% · Avg PPA 0.102 · Total 6.400
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1026.40017.2%
Pass-0.224-0.6731.8%
Rush0.1297.62831.2%
1st down0.1837.50325.0%
2nd down-0.160-2.87715.1%
3rd down0.4431.7735.3%
Standard downs0.1447.61521.0%
Passing downs-0.122-1.2158.7%
Will Wilson · QBUsage 10.9% · Avg PPA 0.411 · Total 22.211
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.41122.21110.9%
Pass-0.054-0.7535.8%
Rush0.57422.96416.7%
1st down0.0460.7857.8%
2nd down0.3915.4738.6%
3rd down0.58711.74419.4%
Standard downs0.44320.84214.0%
Passing downs0.1961.3694.4%
Keenan Jackson · WRUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA 0.815 · Total 35.034
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.81535.0348.7%
Pass0.94939.86217.3%
Rush-4.828-4.8280.4%
1st down0.0771.1496.8%
2nd down1.14414.8738.0%
3rd down1.60620.87412.6%
Standard downs0.1323.0306.8%
Passing downs1.60032.00412.5%
Joshisa Trader · WRUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.602 · Total 16.865
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.60216.8657.6%
Pass0.53414.43016.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0500.5476.7%
2nd down0.8718.7118.4%
3rd down1.0877.6079.2%
Standard downs0.4787.1646.0%
Passing downs0.7469.70111.3%
Preston Douglas · TEUsage 6.5% · Avg PPA 0.719 · Total 23.002
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.71923.0026.5%
Pass0.71923.00213.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7498.2395.0%
2nd down0.1281.4126.8%
3rd down1.33513.3509.7%
Standard downs0.4979.9446.0%
Passing downs1.08813.0587.5%
Dylan McCoy · RBUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA 0.427 · Total 2.989
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4272.9895.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.4272.98911.1%
1st down-0.031-0.0944.9%
2nd down1.0133.0386.7%
3rd down0.0450.0454.0%
Standard downs0.4912.9446.1%
Passing downs0.0450.0452.9%
Victor Snow · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.208 · Total 5.204
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2085.2045.0%
Pass0.2305.5289.9%
Rush-0.325-0.3250.4%
1st down0.0660.5313.7%
2nd down0.1170.9404.9%
3rd down0.7705.3906.8%
Standard downs0.2942.6422.7%
Passing downs0.1602.56210.0%
Deandre Desinor · RBUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.529 · Total 5.815
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5295.8154.4%
Pass0.7565.2915.4%
Rush0.1310.5233.4%
1st down1.0155.0774.5%
2nd down-0.198-0.7914.9%
3rd down0.7651.5293.8%
Standard downs0.5724.5804.6%
Passing downs0.4121.2353.8%
Isiah Jones · RBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.383 · Total 1.149
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3831.1494.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3831.1497.0%
1st down0.1060.1062.7%
2nd down-0.614-0.6144.5%
3rd down1.6581.6588.3%
Standard downs0.3831.1495.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tex Vaughn · TEUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.261 · Total -0.783
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.261-0.7834.2%
Pass-0.261-0.78311.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.576-1.1525.4%
2nd down0.3680.3684.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.576-1.1523.5%
Passing downs0.3680.3687.1%
Vander Ploog · TEUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 1.791 · Total 3.581
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.7913.5813.9%
Pass1.7913.5817.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.083-0.0835.9%
3rd down3.6643.6647.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.7913.58110.5%
Chance Robinson · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.210 · Total 3.361
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2103.3613.6%
Pass0.2103.3617.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.382-2.6743.5%
2nd down-0.067-0.3353.4%
3rd down1.5936.3714.4%
Standard downs0.0860.7763.0%
Passing downs0.3692.5865.0%
Tyran Warren · WRUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.045 · Total 0.773
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0450.7733.4%
Pass0.0450.7737.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5003.5023.2%
2nd down-0.068-0.5404.9%
3rd down-1.094-2.1891.9%
Standard downs0.0931.0263.3%
Passing downs-0.042-0.2533.8%
Davion Dozier · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.140 · Total 0.840
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1400.8403.0%
Pass0.1400.8406.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.050-0.2014.3%
2nd down1.4771.4771.6%
3rd down-0.436-0.4362.4%
Standard downs-0.050-0.2012.8%
Passing downs0.5211.0413.3%
Hunter Provience · TEUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.601 · Total 7.214
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6017.2142.8%
Pass0.6017.2145.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5802.3212.1%
2nd down0.1750.8773.5%
3rd down1.3394.0163.4%
Standard downs0.4433.1042.4%
Passing downs0.8224.1113.7%
Jonathan Paylor · RBUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 1.012 · Total 2.023
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0122.0232.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush1.0122.0234.7%
1st down1.0122.0235.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.0122.0233.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Darius Johnson · RBUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.103 · Total 0.824
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1030.8242.4%
Pass0.0630.1881.7%
Rush0.1270.6363.2%
1st down-0.073-0.3663.4%
2nd down0.0890.1771.8%
3rd down1.0131.0131.4%
Standard downs0.0020.0113.1%
Passing downs0.8140.8140.9%
Ashton Locklear · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA -0.852 · Total -5.113
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.852-5.1132.2%
Pass-0.852-5.1134.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.564-1.1292.2%
3rd down1.4142.8283.3%
Standard downs-0.323-0.3230.5%
Passing downs-0.958-4.7905.6%
Amiri Acker · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.877 · Total 1.755
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8771.7551.5%
Pass0.8771.7552.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.000-1.0002.2%
3rd down2.7542.7544.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.8771.7555.7%
Noah Moss · RBUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.347 · Total 0.347
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3470.3471.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3470.3472.3%
1st down0.3470.3472.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3470.3471.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where NC State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.209 (74th percentile; 138 teams)74thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.462 (70th percentile; 138 teams)70thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.238 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.339 (77th percentile; 138 teams)77thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.103 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.187 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.425 (33rd percentile; 138 teams)33rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.328 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.145 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31st
Values and percentiles
NC State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.20974th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.46270th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.23850th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.33977th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.10350th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.18715th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42533rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.32815th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14531st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 235 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.7 yards (54th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.4 per completion. Completion 65.5%, 7.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.39.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense64.9%60.7%+4.2208 / 235
Defense allowed67.4%59.8%+7.6181 / 211

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is NC State.

Target mix by zone, NC State offense
Short left22% · 51Short middle23% · 52Short right41% · 95Deep left4% · 10Deep middle3% · 6Deep right7% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
NC State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense23599%8.75.465.5%0.39+4.2 pp208
Passing defense21199%9.44.662.6%0.41+7.6 pp181

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2544.646.4%0.173.101.001.4014.8%78.0%
Defense allowed2204.644.1%0.163.001.101.6019.1%75.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense249 / 2542441012550237 / 237 · 100.0%
Defense allowed217 / 220210109670203 / 204 · 99.5%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +4.2 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-7.91.811.5W1W1 vs Virginia: -7.9 ppW2W3W3 vs Vanderbilt: +9.7 ppW4W4 vs App State: +11.5 ppW5W5 vs Louisville: +3.4 ppW6W6 vs Wake Forest: +8.3 ppW8W8 vs Stanford: -4.0 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Virginia272755.6%63.4%-7.9 pp8.3-0.32243.2-0.22
W2Richmond250———10.20.93459.70.74
W3Vanderbilt383868.4%58.8%+9.7 pp9.80.16404.20.14
W4App State333271.9%60.4%+11.5 pp7.00.33464.50.29
W5Louisville414161.0%57.6%+3.4 pp10.50.78432.8-0.10
W6Wake Forest404072.5%64.3%+8.3 pp6.30.22231.7-0.28
W8Stanford313056.7%60.7%-4.0 pp9.10.67333.80.15

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

26 punts · 42.0 gross yards/punt · 40.9 net yards/punt

10 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 26/26 punts. Known net yards: 26/26 punts.

Our punt returns

11 returns · 10.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

2 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 11/11 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Stanford541.041.05/5
Week 6 · Wake Forest445.043.04/4
Week 5 · Louisville336.336.33/3
Week 4 · App State342.742.73/3
Week 3 · Vanderbilt335.729.03/3
Team style
Rating history