Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Navy

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Navy's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 75 across 8 systems; best 60, worst 92, so they disagree by 32 places.

Lab EPA
#68
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#85
down 32026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#80
down 82026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#70
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#92
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#60
down 9 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#91
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#68
down 182026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#122 of 138
Schedule strength
#121 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#58 of 138
Game control
#125 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#101 of 138
Offense
#73 of 138
Defense
#123 of 138
Special teams
#93 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Navy · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.000 net EPA/play

#68

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-2.28 points

#85 · Down 3 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +0.32 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.86, schedule #83 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.89. That is worth -3.54 on its own; the preseason prior of +1.63 still carries 24% of the weight, giving -2.28.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Navy · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Towson
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401862696
+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.76379.32%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.284-2.330-0.047
Week 2 · Florida Atlantic
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862703
-8.00 → -8.00+2.500.79379.69%-5.46-0.533-0.529-1.062
Week 4 · UAB
away · 2026-09-25 · ID 401862778
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.857210.46%-8.45-0.157-0.884-1.041
Week 5 · Air Force
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862791
-5.00 → -5.00+2.500.890910.87%-1.75-0.272-0.191-0.463
Week 6 · Tulsa
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401862799
+8.00 → +8.00-2.500.925911.30%-1.220.621-0.1380.484
Week 7 · UTSA
away · 2026-10-18 · ID 401862804
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.962211.74%+3.69-0.1760.4330.257
Week 8 · North Texas
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401862810
-10.00 → -10.00-2.501.000012.20%+5.88-1.5260.718-0.808

Game terms -2.68 points; prior term +0.40 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -2.28 points. The preseason prior is +1.63 with 24.41% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-1.6 SP+ points

#80 · Down 8 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

1.48 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#60 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 1.87 on 366 plays; defense 0.39 on 380 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Navy 17 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
2-5 · conf 1-4 · home 2-1 · away 0-4 · expected wins 3.3
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-5 ATS (-3.9 avg) · 2025: 5-8 ATS (-0.5 avg)
Head coach
Brian Newberry · hired 2022-12-19 · 26-12 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #153 (38 pts) · 2025 #132 (65 pts) · 2026 #144 (99 pts)
Returning
14% of production · 14% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-3%13%
Receiving15%13%
Rushing19%14%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back72.860.81855.73
Defensive Line62.830.81684.90
Linebacker22.500.78421.57
Offensive Line43.000.83613.34
Quarterback73.000.82355.76
Receiver72.710.82195.75
Running Back23.000.82001.64
Special Teams32.330.80392.41

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Jackson Gutierrez · QB

CFBD athlete 5220473. Navy (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.40814545.6%
Pass 76.9% · Rush 38.6%

1st 41.6% · 2nd 46.0% · 3rd 50.0%

Standard downs 44.3% · Passing downs 49.2%

2024: stars unavailable
Jackson Gutierrez · QB

CFBD athlete 5220473. Navy (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.5297745.6%
Pass 76.9% · Rush 38.6%

1st 41.6% · 2nd 46.0% · 3rd 50.0%

Standard downs 44.3% · Passing downs 49.2%

2024: stars unavailable
Michael Barrow · WR

CFBD athlete 5220469. Navy (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1467118.3%
Pass 9.9% · Rush 20.8%

1st 24.3% · 2nd 18.7% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 20.8% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Vic Listorti · RB

CFBD athlete 5158373. Navy (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1073110.3%
Pass 7.7% · Rush 11.2%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 11.3% · 3rd 13.4%

Standard downs 10.9% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
Nolan Bartley · PK

CFBD athlete 5391330. Navy (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-2.7107—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Andre Gilbert Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5220471. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.7%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Braxton Woodson · QB

CFBD athlete 5158343. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——22.0%
Pass 33.8% · Rush 19.4%

1st 19.3% · 2nd 22.1% · 3rd 33.9%

Standard downs 18.2% · Passing downs 31.5%

Not linked
Charles Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5220476. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 23.5% · Rush 3.8%

1st 9.0% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 13.1%

Not linked
Chris Daley II · RB

CFBD athlete 5391355. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Christian Cromer · RB

CFBD athlete 5295391. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.1%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Evan Blouir · QB

CFBD athlete 5391331. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 2.4%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 1.7%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
Gage Leonard · WR

CFBD athlete 5158365. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 1.4%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Isaiah Bryant · WR

CFBD athlete 5158374. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 4.3%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 6.0% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
Jacob Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 5391358. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.8%

1st 8.1% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Jake Norris · TE

CFBD athlete 5158398. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 16.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jaydn Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5220492. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 1.6%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jordan Collins · TE

CFBD athlete 5212655. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 14.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 3.9% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 6.9%

Not linked
Joshua Guerin · WR

CFBD athlete 5158395. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Landon Walker · WR

CFBD athlete 5222710. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 5.5%

1st 8.1% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Luke Hutchison · WR

CFBD athlete 5158341. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 11.1% · Rush 0.8%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 6.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Merrick Barlow · TE

CFBD athlete 5211746. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 12.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 3.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Ryan Brass · QB

CFBD athlete 5295377. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 1.4%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Stefan Egbe · RB

CFBD athlete 5158369. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.1%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Theo Elwell · TE

CFBD athlete 5220496. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 16.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Tre Jones · WR

CFBD athlete 5220472. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.9%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 2.6%

Not linked
Truman Brasfield · WR

CFBD athlete 5391321. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 22.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 8.2%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 0 reported

No incoming transfers in this capture.

Outgoing · 3 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brady McDonough · QBGeorgetown2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Jaylin Acevedo · OTSouth Florida2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Justin Ross · CBVirginia2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Navy. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Brian Newberry · career 26–12 across 4 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 30 appointments
  1. 2023–present · Brian Newberry · active at capture

    26–12 · 38 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2007–2022 · Ken Niumatalolo

    109–83 · 192 attributed games · 16 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2007-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2002–2007 · Paul Johnson

    45–29 · 74 attributed games · 6 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2001-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1995–2001 · Charlie Weatherbie

    30–45 · 75 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1990–1994 · George Chaump

    14–41 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1987–1989 · Elliot Uzelac

    8–25 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1982–1986 · Gary Tranquill

    20–34–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1973–1981 · George Welsh

    55–46–1 · 102 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1969–1972 · Rick Forzano

    10–33 · 43 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1965–1968 · William Elias

    15–22–3 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1959–1964 · Wayne Hardin

    38–22–2 · 62 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1950–1958 · Eddie Erdelatz

    50–26–8 · 84 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1948–1949 · George Sauer

    3–13–2 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1946–1947 · Thomas Hamilton

    2–15–1 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1944–1945 · Oscar Hagberg

    13–4–1 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1942–1943 · John Whelchel

    13–5 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1939–1941 · Swede Larson

    16–8–3 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1937–1938 · Hank Hardwick

    8–7–3 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1934–1936 · Thomas Hamilton

    19–8 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1931–1933 · Rip Miller

    12–15–2 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1926–1930 · William Ingram

    32–13–4 · 49 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1925–1925 · Jack Owsley

    5–2–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1917–1919 · Gilmour Dobie

    17–3 · 20 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1915–1916 · Jonas Ingram

    9–8–2 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1911–1914 · Douglas Legate Howard

    25–7–4 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1908–1910 · Frank Berrien

    21–5–3 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1907–1907 · Joe Reeves

    9–2–1 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1904–1906 · Paul Dashiell

    25–5–4 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  29. 1900–1900 · Garrett Cochran

    6–3 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  30. 1896–1896 · Johnny Poe

    5–3 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Brian Newberry · incomplete attribution0–0——0.2-7144—
2025 · Brian Newberry11–27–11–06.22.113223
2024 · Brian Newberry10–36–21–03.55.7153—
2023 · Brian Newberry5–74–40–0-13.7-11.4131—
2022 · Ken Niumatalolo4–84–40–0-7.2-1.9138—
2021 · Ken Niumatalolo4–83–50–0-8.5-5.5107—
2020 · Ken Niumatalolo3–73–40–0-9.3—126—
2019 · Ken Niumatalolo11–27–11–09.912.912420
2018 · Ken Niumatalolo3–102–60–0-10.2-9.7106—
2017 · Ken Niumatalolo7–64–41–0-0.76.188—
2016 · Ken Niumatalolo9–57–20–16.82.591—
2015 · Ken Niumatalolo11–27–11–012.113.511218
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:13:05 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play41 / 13870.8112 / 13819.0
Success rate27 / 13881.066 / 13852.6
Explosiveness86 / 13838.0128 / 1387.3
Standard-down success7 / 13895.6T70 / 13849.3
Passing-down success118 / 13814.659 / 13857.7
Pass PPA65 / 13853.3127 / 1388.0
Rush PPA12 / 13892.060 / 13856.9
Pass explosiveness1 / 138100.0134 / 1382.9
Rush explosiveness25 / 13882.575 / 13846.0
Line yards4 / 13897.838 / 13873.0
Second-level yards29 / 13879.611 / 13892.7
Open-field yards14 / 13890.526 / 13881.8
Stuff rate5 / 13897.157 / 13859.1
Power success2 / 13899.3113 / 13818.2
HavocT38 / 13870.8T115 / 13816.4
Front-seven havocT97 / 13829.6T77 / 13843.8
DB havoc11 / 13892.7T127 / 1387.7
Points / opportunity57 / 13859.1T106 / 13823.0
Average field positionT130 / 1385.5118 / 13814.6
Field-position expected points131 / 1385.1118 / 13814.6

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Jackson Gutierrez · QBUsage 45.6% · Avg PPA 0.350 · Total 74.161
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35074.16145.6%
Pass0.38627.03776.9%
Rush0.36251.05238.6%
1st down0.16014.25941.6%
2nd down0.50034.46746.0%
3rd down0.68027.89150.0%
Standard downs0.30946.59444.3%
Passing downs0.45227.56749.2%
Braxton Woodson · QBUsage 22.0% · Avg PPA 0.389 · Total 27.621
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.38927.62122.0%
Pass-0.140-3.22133.8%
Rush0.64330.84219.4%
1st down0.0220.65219.3%
2nd down0.59013.56822.1%
3rd down0.70513.40133.9%
Standard downs0.48520.38018.2%
Passing downs0.2507.24231.5%
Michael Barrow · WRUsage 18.3% · Avg PPA 0.193 · Total 16.437
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.19316.43718.3%
Pass0.5765.1849.9%
Rush0.14811.25320.8%
1st down0.0110.55024.3%
2nd down0.46813.10218.7%
3rd down-0.128-0.5134.9%
Standard downs0.14310.14820.8%
Passing downs0.4496.28911.3%
Vic Listorti · RBUsage 10.3% · Avg PPA 0.091 · Total 4.387
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0914.38710.3%
Pass0.1811.2647.7%
Rush0.0763.12311.2%
1st down-0.508-9.6528.9%
2nd down0.2133.61411.3%
3rd down0.7077.77413.4%
Standard downs0.1013.72810.9%
Passing downs0.0600.6598.9%
Charles Robinson · WRUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 0.141 · Total 4.371
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1414.3718.0%
Pass-0.041-0.82423.5%
Rush0.4725.1943.8%
1st down0.2393.8299.0%
2nd down0.2861.1453.3%
3rd down0.3223.22414.3%
Standard downs0.3225.4676.1%
Passing downs-0.078-1.09713.1%
Jacob Williams · RBUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 0.540 · Total 2.699
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5402.6996.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5402.6996.8%
1st down0.2550.7668.1%
2nd down-0.393-0.3933.7%
3rd down2.3262.3268.3%
Standard downs0.0930.3736.5%
Passing downs2.3262.3265.9%
Landon Walker · WRUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA 0.622 · Total 2.489
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6222.4895.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.6222.4895.5%
1st down0.8762.6288.1%
2nd down-0.139-0.1393.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.6222.4896.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Truman Brasfield · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.973 · Total 11.677
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.97311.6774.4%
Pass0.97311.67722.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3736.8634.0%
2nd down-0.230-0.6903.5%
3rd down1.3765.5048.2%
Standard downs1.3736.8632.5%
Passing downs0.6884.81410.0%
Isaiah Bryant · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA -0.290 · Total -2.606
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.290-2.6064.3%
Pass0.4160.8314.3%
Rush-0.491-3.4384.3%
1st down-1.056-2.1122.2%
2nd down-0.284-1.1366.0%
3rd down0.2140.6417.9%
Standard downs-0.596-2.9803.4%
Passing downs0.0930.3746.8%
Luke Hutchison · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.161 · Total 1.126
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1611.1263.8%
Pass0.7764.65511.1%
Rush-3.528-3.5280.8%
1st down0.5161.0312.4%
2nd down0.9063.6236.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.431-2.1544.0%
Passing downs1.6403.2803.3%
Stefan Egbe · RBUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.121 · Total 0.604
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1210.6043.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1210.6044.1%
1st down0.1330.2663.0%
2nd down-0.143-0.2854.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1620.6493.8%
Passing downs-0.045-0.0453.1%
Jordan Collins · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 1.243 · Total 12.434
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.24312.4343.2%
Pass1.24312.43414.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down3.9247.8471.4%
2nd down1.3715.4823.9%
3rd down-0.174-0.3473.6%
Standard downs2.51710.0671.8%
Passing downs0.3942.3676.9%
Merrick Barlow · TEUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA -0.192 · Total -0.961
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.192-0.9612.7%
Pass-0.192-0.96112.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.1214.2412.2%
2nd down-1.161-1.1611.7%
3rd down-0.014-0.0143.0%
Standard downs1.0273.0802.2%
Passing downs-2.021-4.0413.8%
Andre Gilbert Jr. · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA -0.607 · Total -1.214
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.607-1.2142.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.607-1.2142.7%
1st down-0.425-0.4252.7%
2nd down-0.789-0.7893.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.607-1.2143.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Christian Cromer · RBUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA -0.283 · Total -1.414
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.283-1.4142.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.283-1.4143.1%
1st down-0.442-0.8832.2%
2nd down-0.002-0.0033.0%
3rd down-0.528-0.5282.6%
Standard downs-0.287-1.1472.7%
Passing downs-0.267-0.2671.7%
Joshua Guerin · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA -0.604 · Total -2.416
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.604-2.4162.2%
Pass-0.604-2.4168.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.139-1.1391.2%
2nd down0.3460.3461.6%
3rd down-0.811-1.6235.9%
Standard downs-0.396-0.7931.6%
Passing downs-0.811-1.6233.4%
Evan Blouir · QBUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.110 · Total 0.769
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1100.7692.1%
Pass0.7360.7361.4%
Rush0.0050.0322.4%
1st down0.5361.6082.1%
2nd down-0.525-1.5752.8%
3rd down0.7360.7361.7%
Standard downs0.3661.8312.1%
Passing downs-0.531-1.0632.2%
Chris Daley II · RBUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.097 · Total -0.097
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.097-0.0972.0%
Pass-0.097-0.0975.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.097-0.0979.1%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.097-0.0975.3%
Tre Jones · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.353 · Total -0.706
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.353-0.7061.5%
Pass-0.692-0.6923.4%
Rush-0.014-0.0140.9%
1st down-0.014-0.0141.6%
2nd down-0.692-0.6922.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.014-0.0141.0%
Passing downs-0.692-0.6922.6%
Gage Leonard · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 1.081 · Total 1.081
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0811.0811.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush1.0811.0811.4%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.0811.0818.3%
Standard downs1.0811.0811.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jake Norris · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -1.150 · Total -1.150
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.150-1.1501.3%
Pass-1.150-1.15016.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.150-1.1502.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.150-1.1501.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jaydn Jones · RBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.227 · Total 0.227
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2270.2271.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2270.2271.6%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.2270.2278.3%
Standard downs0.2270.2271.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ryan Brass · QBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.284 · Total -0.284
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.284-0.2841.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.284-0.2841.4%
1st down-0.284-0.2842.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.284-0.2841.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Theo Elwell · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -1.062 · Total -1.062
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.062-1.0621.3%
Pass-1.062-1.06216.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-1.062-1.0628.3%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-1.062-1.0625.9%
Where Navy sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.198 (71st percentile; 138 teams)71stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.475 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81stOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.205 (38th percentile; 138 teams)38thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.226 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.228 (92nd percentile; 138 teams)92ndDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.164 (19th percentile; 138 teams)19thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.403 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.385 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.133 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16th
Values and percentiles
Navy metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.19871st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.47581st138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.20538th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.22653rd138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.22892nd138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.16419th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.40353rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.3857th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13316th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 97% of 87 attempts charted. Average depth of target 14.2 yards (99th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 8.6 per completion. Completion 47.1%, 9.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.26.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense43.1%52.8%-9.772 / 87
Defense allowed71.8%60.6%+11.2124 / 183

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Navy.

Target mix by zone, Navy offense
Short left23% · 19Short middle12% · 10Short right38% · 31Deep left6% · 5Deep middle9% · 7Deep right12% · 10

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Navy passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense8797%14.28.647.1%0.26-9.7 pp72
Passing defense18397%10.05.170.5%0.55+11.2 pp124

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3765.851.1%0.293.501.201.7011.8%86.7%
Defense allowed2453.339.3%0.062.800.800.7017.4%80.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense371 / 37636799131362 / 364 · 99.5%
Defense allowed244 / 245238715660224 / 224 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -9.7 pp. 5 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-25.5-5.115.3W1W2W2 vs Florida Atlantic: -25.5 ppW4W4 vs UAB: -17.4 ppW5W5 vs Air Force: -9.5 ppW6W7W7 vs UTSA: +6.2 ppW8W8 vs North Texas: +15.3 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Towson60———8.8-0.38737.00.55
W2Florida Atlantic232133.3%58.8%-25.5 pp10.0-0.10366.80.28
W4UAB131330.8%48.2%-17.4 pp20.2-0.15584.40.23
W5Air Force181844.4%53.9%-9.5 pp14.70.41303.7-0.23
W6Tulsa70———10.00.52675.80.29
W7UTSA8850.0%43.8%+6.2 pp22.40.98486.20.40
W8North Texas121266.7%51.3%+15.3 pp13.80.83645.70.17

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

22 punts · 43.1 gross yards/punt · 32.7 net yards/punt

2 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 22/22 punts. Known net yards: 19/22 punts.

Our punt returns

9 returns · 5.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 9/9 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · North Texas342.717.33/3
Week 7 · UTSA344.335.73/3
Week 6 · Tulsa0——0/0
Week 5 · Air Force749.342.65/7
Week 4 · UAB325.725.73/3
Team style
Rating history