Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Missouri State

2026 season

Conference USA
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Missouri State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 129.5 across 8 systems; best 123, worst 136, so they disagree by 13 places.

Lab EPA
#136
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#128
down 72026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#128
down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#123
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#128
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#134
up 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#131
down 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#136
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#124 of 138
Schedule strength
#81 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#108 of 138
Game control
#105 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#125 of 138
Offense
#105 of 138
Defense
#127 of 138
Special teams
#92 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Missouri State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.215 net EPA/play

#136

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-11.70 points

#128 · Down 7 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -8.23 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.26, schedule #107 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.47. That is worth -14.49 on its own; the preseason prior of -3.16 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -11.70.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Missouri State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Texas A&M
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856668
-50.00 → -35.00+2.500.76379.40%+7.08-3.0540.666-2.388
Week 2 · Lindenwood
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401871046
+34.00 → +34.00-2.500.79379.77%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.076-2.4410.635
Week 3 · Marshall
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401871047
-6.00 → -6.00-2.500.824910.15%-10.24-0.863-1.040-1.902
Week 4 · SMU
away · 2026-09-27 · ID 401858241
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.857210.55%+7.81-0.7910.8240.033
Week 6 · Western Kentucky
away · 2026-10-08 · ID 401871052
-21.00 → -21.00+2.500.925911.39%-7.94-2.107-0.905-3.012
Week 7 · Kennesaw State
home · 2026-10-14 · ID 401871054
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.962211.84%-9.300.059-1.101-1.041
Week 8 · Delaware
away · 2026-10-20 · ID 401871069
-23.00 → -23.00+2.501.000012.30%-5.85-2.522-0.720-3.242

Game terms -10.92 points; prior term -0.78 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -11.70 points. The preseason prior is -3.16 with 24.61% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-16.9 SP+ points

#128 · Down 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-21.22 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#134 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -7.07 on 335 plays; defense 14.16 on 412 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Missouri State 8 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 0-4 · expected wins 3.3
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (+0.6 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (+1.4 avg)
Head coach
Casey Woods · hired 2025-12-19 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2025 #136 (53 pts) · 2026 #131 (152 pts)
Returning
31% of production · 19% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing5%0%
Receiving47%42%
Rushing-3%19%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back53.000.83934.20
Defensive Line82.630.81786.54
Linebacker23.000.84251.69
Offensive Line43.000.82983.32
Quarterback32.670.82702.48
Receiver52.600.82134.11
Running Back23.000.84171.68
Special Teams32.330.80332.41

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Henry Belin IV · QB

CFBD athlete 4685252. Duke (2022–2025); Missouri State (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.34210931.6%
Pass 56.1% · Rush 7.1%

1st 29.0% · 2nd 29.3% · 3rd 37.4%

Standard downs 27.2% · Passing downs 41.4%

2022: 3★ · 0.8633
Skyler Locklear · QB

CFBD athlete 5083042. Austin Peay (2022–2023); Missouri State (2026–2026); UTEP (2024–2025)

Passing WEPA0.2069443.8%
Pass 74.8% · Rush 15.1%

1st 42.2% · 2nd 39.4% · 3rd 58.8%

Standard downs 39.4% · Passing downs 52.9%

2022: stars unavailable
Connor Lair · RB

CFBD athlete 5085729. Missouri State (2022–2022); Missouri State (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1504415.0%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 26.1%

1st 14.0% · 2nd 17.1% · 3rd 12.7%

Standard downs 15.9% · Passing downs 13.2%

Not linked
Ramone Green Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5154284. Missouri State (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0384415.4%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 26.1%

1st 17.7% · 2nd 16.5% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 17.9% · Passing downs 10.1%

Not linked
Yousef Obeid · PK

CFBD athlete 5155163. Michigan State (2023–2023); Missouri State (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR-1.47010—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Stewart McDonald · P

CFBD athlete 5227774. Missouri State (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-1.9701—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Amar'e Johnson · RB

CFBD athlete 5327017. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 13.5%

1st 8.8% · 2nd 11.1% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 10.9% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Brendon McQueen · WR

CFBD athlete 5227770. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Dillon Hipp · TE

CFBD athlete 5128052. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Elijah Leonard · QB

CFBD athlete 5227766. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Isaiah McMorris · WR

CFBD athlete 5146723. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 9.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Isaiah Myers · WR

CFBD athlete 5219476. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.1%
Pass 22.0% · Rush 0.8%

1st 10.7% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 13.7%

Standard downs 10.1% · Passing downs 13.2%

Not linked
Jambres Dubar · RB

CFBD athlete 5077390. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.0%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 20.1%

1st 15.8% · 2nd 15.1% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 15.1% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
James Rexroat · TE

CFBD athlete 5221049. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jeron Askren · TE

CFBD athlete 5227784. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 10.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.3% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 3.9%

Not linked
Jmariyae Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 4837193. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——14.0%
Pass 29.4% · Rush 0.9%

1st 14.6% · 2nd 7.3% · 3rd 22.1%

Standard downs 12.0% · Passing downs 18.7%

Not linked
King Davis · RB

CFBD athlete 5164337. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 0.7% · Rush 8.2%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 4.4%

Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 1.0%

Not linked
Makai Cope · WR

CFBD athlete 4602895. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Mekhi Miller · WR

CFBD athlete 4712886. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 11.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Michael Osei-Bonsu · TE

CFBD athlete 5383072. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Witt Edwards · TE

CFBD athlete 5147337. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.7%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 19 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Breezy Dubar · RBBoise State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dylan Brooks · EDGEKansas2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Geo Jallah · SNot reported2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Henry Belin IV · QBDuke2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Isaiah Myers · WRWestern Kentucky2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Isaiah Villanueva · IOLJackson State2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jalile Elliott · EDGEBarton2026-01-093★ / 0.8400Immediate
Joel Kpassou · CBDuquesne2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Josh Lukusa · EDGEMiami (OH)2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kellen Lindstrom · EDGETennessee2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
King Large · OTSMU2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Malachi Madison · DLMassachusetts2026-01-133★ / 0.8200Immediate
Markell Chapman · DLIowa State2026-01-103★ / 0.8300Immediate
Mekhi Miller · WRTulsa2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Skyler Locklear · QBUTEP2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Stratton Shufelt · LBUTEP2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tim Coleman · LSUVA Wise2026-01-17— / —Immediate
William Dixon III · OTVMI2026-02-033★ / 0.8500Immediate
Witt Edwards · TEVanderbilt2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 11 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ahmad Poole · DLCoastal Carolina2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Cash Hudson · IOLSouth Florida2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
DJ Wesolak · EDGECoastal Carolina2026-04-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ebubedike Nnabugwu · IOLSouth Carolina2026-01-193★ / 0.8300Immediate
Floyd Williams · CBNot reported2025-12-15— / —Immediate
JJ O'Neal · SNot reported2025-12-12— / —Immediate
Jeron Askren · TENot reported2025-12-282★ / —Immediate
Mitchell Toney · DLCoastal Carolina2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ronnel Johnson · WRJacksonville State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tim Brantley Jr. · DLNot reported2025-12-22— / —Immediate
Tristian Gardner · WRCoastal Carolina2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Missouri State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Casey Woods · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 3 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Casey Woods · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Nick Petrino · interim

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-11. Effective dates: 2025-12-18 to unknown.

  3. 2025–2025 · Ryan Beard

    7–5 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-16. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-18.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Casey Woods · incomplete attribution0–0——-16.6-17.1131—
2025 · Ryan Beard7–55–30–0-10.7-8.8136—
2025 · Nick Petrino0–10–00–1-10.7-8.8136—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:11 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play95 / 13831.4135 / 1382.2
Success rate86 / 13838.0135 / 1382.2
Explosiveness71 / 13848.916 / 13889.1
Standard-down success73 / 13847.4137 / 1380.7
Passing-down success112 / 13819.0122 / 13811.7
Pass PPA55 / 13860.6128 / 1387.3
Rush PPA118 / 13814.6114 / 13817.5
Pass explosiveness18 / 13887.641 / 13870.8
Rush explosiveness122 / 13811.726 / 13881.8
Line yards101 / 13827.0126 / 1388.8
Second-level yards110 / 13820.4119 / 13813.9
Open-field yards105 / 13824.190 / 13835.0
Stuff rate88 / 13836.5114 / 13817.5
Power successT75 / 13844.298 / 13829.2
HavocT98 / 13828.8T122 / 13811.3
Front-seven havocT108 / 13820.8T127 / 1387.7
DB havocT68 / 13850.4T76 / 13844.2
Points / opportunityT63 / 13854.4121 / 13812.4
Average field positionT122 / 13811.3137 / 1380.7
Field-position expected points121 / 13812.4137 / 1380.7

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Skyler Locklear · QBUsage 43.8% · Avg PPA 0.143 · Total 19.703
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.14319.70343.8%
Pass0.20923.61674.8%
Rush-0.035-0.84215.1%
1st down0.18710.11542.2%
2nd down0.0823.38039.4%
3rd down0.46418.57758.8%
Standard downs0.0776.48039.4%
Passing downs0.24513.22352.9%
Henry Belin IV · QBUsage 30.5% · Avg PPA 0.087 · Total 10.848
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.08710.84830.5%
Pass0.26127.93251.7%
Rush-0.484-6.7767.3%
1st down0.2009.80527.8%
2nd down-0.069-2.68228.9%
3rd down0.74820.95435.4%
Standard downs0.1098.06326.2%
Passing downs0.0562.78540.3%
Ramone Green Jr. · RBUsage 15.2% · Avg PPA -0.007 · Total -0.464
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.007-0.46415.2%
Pass-0.033-0.4285.8%
Rush-0.001-0.03625.7%
1st down0.0090.30116.8%
2nd down-0.026-0.68317.6%
3rd down-0.008-0.08211.1%
Standard downs-0.034-1.74716.8%
Passing downs0.0801.28311.6%
Jmariyae Robinson · WRUsage 14.1% · Avg PPA -0.026 · Total -1.406
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.026-1.40614.1%
Pass-0.038-1.99828.4%
Rush0.2960.5921.0%
1st down0.1984.95814.9%
2nd down0.0500.4987.8%
3rd down0.3385.40221.6%
Standard downs-0.084-2.60611.4%
Passing downs0.0521.20120.4%
Jambres Dubar · RBUsage 14.0% · Avg PPA 0.046 · Total 2.043
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0462.04314.0%
Pass-0.347-2.0824.0%
Rush0.1094.12523.9%
1st down-0.114-2.61918.0%
2nd down0.1172.22918.3%
3rd down1.1711.1711.5%
Standard downs-0.141-5.20917.4%
Passing downs1.0367.2526.9%
Connor Lair · RBUsage 12.8% · Avg PPA 0.049 · Total 2.790
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0492.79012.8%
Pass0.4194.6094.9%
Rush-0.040-1.81921.5%
1st down0.0461.05112.0%
2nd down0.1402.79113.5%
3rd down0.6056.05111.1%
Standard downs0.0170.75414.2%
Passing downs0.1572.0369.4%
Isaiah Myers · WRUsage 11.6% · Avg PPA 1.304 · Total 67.832
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.30467.83211.6%
Pass1.29964.93622.3%
Rush1.4482.8960.9%
1st down0.96420.24511.0%
2nd down0.90114.41710.8%
3rd down2.08329.15715.6%
Standard downs1.14336.58710.4%
Passing downs1.56231.24614.5%
Amar'e Johnson · RBUsage 8.9% · Avg PPA 0.215 · Total 1.502
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2151.5028.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2151.50213.5%
1st down0.2040.6128.8%
2nd down0.1550.46611.1%
3rd down0.4240.4247.1%
Standard downs-0.051-0.30510.9%
Passing downs1.8071.8074.2%
Jeron Askren · TEUsage 5.9% · Avg PPA 0.177 · Total 2.832
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1772.8325.9%
Pass0.1772.83210.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.102-1.0188.8%
2nd down0.6832.0483.4%
3rd down-0.324-0.6483.5%
Standard downs0.2553.3107.0%
Passing downs-0.159-0.4773.7%
Mekhi Miller · WRUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.377 · Total 6.408
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3776.4085.4%
Pass0.3776.40811.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0770.6937.0%
2nd down0.5923.5545.8%
3rd down1.0812.1612.9%
Standard downs0.2532.7845.2%
Passing downs0.6043.6255.9%
King Davis · RBUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA -0.131 · Total -1.827
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.131-1.8275.3%
Pass-0.395-0.3950.8%
Rush-0.110-1.4329.6%
1st down-0.492-2.9545.6%
2nd down0.1920.9625.9%
3rd down0.0550.1655.4%
Standard downs-0.094-1.2227.2%
Passing downs-0.606-0.6061.2%
Isaiah McMorris · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.558 · Total -3.348
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.558-3.3484.2%
Pass-0.558-3.3489.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0880.1773.5%
2nd down-0.347-0.3472.1%
3rd down0.3440.6876.7%
Standard downs0.1550.6204.3%
Passing downs-1.984-3.9684.1%
Brendon McQueen · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA -0.329 · Total -1.317
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.329-1.3173.8%
Pass-0.329-1.3176.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.157-1.1572.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.053-0.15911.1%
Standard downs-0.786-1.5723.1%
Passing downs0.1280.2565.1%
Dillon Hipp · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.516 · Total 7.736
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5167.7363.4%
Pass0.5167.7366.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5242.0952.1%
2nd down0.0220.1103.4%
3rd down0.9225.5316.7%
Standard downs0.5054.0412.6%
Passing downs0.5283.6955.1%
Makai Cope · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA -0.983 · Total -5.898
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.983-5.8982.5%
Pass-0.983-5.8984.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.226-0.4512.0%
2nd down-1.130-1.1301.3%
3rd down-0.348-0.6974.1%
Standard downs-0.527-1.5821.9%
Passing downs-1.439-4.3164.0%
Witt Edwards · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.257 · Total 5.027
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2575.0271.6%
Pass1.2575.0273.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.9575.9131.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.443-0.8863.8%
Standard downs2.9575.9131.1%
Passing downs-0.443-0.8862.6%
Elijah Leonard · QBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 2.310 · Total 2.310
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.3102.3101.3%
Pass2.3102.3103.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down2.3102.3107.1%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs2.3102.3104.2%
James Rexroat · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.085 · Total 0.085
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0850.0851.3%
Pass0.0850.0853.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.0850.0853.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0850.0851.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Michael Osei-Bonsu · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 2.310 · Total 2.310
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.3102.3101.3%
Pass2.3102.3103.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down2.3102.3107.1%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs2.3102.3104.2%
Where Missouri State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.077 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.414 (38th percentile; 138 teams)38thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.238 (49th percentile; 138 teams)49thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.253 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.020 (14th percentile; 138 teams)14thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.262 (2nd percentile; 138 teams)2ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.500 (2nd percentile; 138 teams)2ndDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.113 (89th percentile; 138 teams)89thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.127 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11th
Values and percentiles
Missouri State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.07731st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.41438th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.23849th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.25361st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.02014th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.2622nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.5002nd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.11389th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.12711th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 235 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.6 yards (50th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.7 per completion. Completion 66.8%, 7.9 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.27.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense64.6%62.4%+2.2209 / 235
Defense allowed66.9%60.8%+6.2236 / 263

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Missouri State.

Target mix by zone, Missouri State offense
Short left23% · 52Short middle11% · 26Short right48% · 110Deep left7% · 16Deep middle3% · 7Deep right7% · 16

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Missouri State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense23599%8.65.766.8%0.27+2.2 pp209
Passing defense26398%9.15.465.4%0.38+6.2 pp236

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2633.846.1%0.052.900.900.9016.6%74.4%
Defense allowed3004.348.7%0.183.301.100.9012.9%76.1%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense254 / 2632481516660241 / 241 · 100.0%
Defense allowed294 / 3002703013880274 / 279 · 98.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +2.2 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-18.3-3.211.9W1W1 vs Texas A&M: -18.3 ppW2W3W3 vs Marshall: +7.9 ppW4W4 vs SMU: +2.5 ppW6W6 vs Western Kentucky: -9.6 ppW7W7 vs Kennesaw State: +9.4 ppW8W8 vs Delaware: +11.9 ppW9W9 vs Sam Houston: +2.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Texas A&M171747.1%65.3%-18.3 pp7.2-0.27231.4-0.56
W2Lindenwood250———10.10.72534.70.29
W3Marshall292969.0%61.1%+7.9 pp8.60.64365.20.17
W4SMU333363.6%61.2%+2.5 pp8.7-0.12282.6-0.08
W6Western Kentucky383852.6%62.2%-9.6 pp9.8-0.12294.70.20
W7Kennesaw State403971.8%62.4%+9.4 pp6.90.26333.6-0.18
W8Delaware353574.3%62.3%+11.9 pp9.10.49234.10.21
W9Sam Houston181866.7%64.1%+2.5 pp8.10.65383.00.05

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

27 punts · 41.3 gross yards/punt · 38.2 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 27/27 punts. Known net yards: 25/27 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 11.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Sam Houston442.342.84/4
Week 8 · Delaware229.518.01/2
Week 7 · Kennesaw State239.539.52/2
Week 6 · Western Kentucky341.741.33/3
Week 4 · SMU642.339.05/6
Team style
Rating history