Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Michigan State

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Michigan State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 76 across 8 systems; best 60, worst 98, so they disagree by 38 places.

Lab EPA
#98
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#72
up 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#88
down 92026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#80
down 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#64
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#63
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#60
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#98
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#94 of 138
Schedule strength
#12 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#53 of 138
Game control
#77 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#70 of 138
Offense
#93 of 138
Defense
#59 of 138
Special teams
#18 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Michigan State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-6 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.070 net EPA/play

#98

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

0.05 points

#72 · Up 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -7.17 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +7.60, schedule #3 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +0.43 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.28 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +0.05.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Michigan State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Toledo
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858429
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.76378.47%+1.380.6350.1170.752
Week 2 · Eastern Michigan
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858440
+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.79378.80%-9.302.244-0.8181.426
Week 3 · Notre Dame
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858453
-17.00 → -17.00+2.500.82499.15%+19.89-1.3261.8200.493
Week 4 · Nebraska
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858464
-18.00 → -18.00-2.500.85729.51%+10.82-1.9491.028-0.920
Week 5 · Wisconsin
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858479
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.89099.88%+8.97-2.5190.886-1.633
Week 6 · Illinois
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858480
-1.00 → -1.00 (OT)-2.500.925910.27%+3.72-0.3590.3820.023
Week 7 · Northwestern
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858491
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.962210.67%+10.95-0.5871.1680.581
Week 8 · UCLA
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858499
-18.00 → -18.00+2.501.000011.09%+12.00-1.7191.330-0.388

Game terms +0.33 points; prior term -0.28 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +0.05 points. The preseason prior is -1.28 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-3.0 SP+ points

#88 · Down 9 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

1.35 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#63 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -3.25 on 472 plays; defense -4.59 on 501 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Michigan State 26 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
2-6 · conf 0-5 · home 2-3 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.0
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-3-1 ATS (-0.6 avg) · 2025: 7-5 ATS (-2.3 avg)
Head coach
Pat Fitzgerald · hired 2025-12-01 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #42 (204 pts) · 2025 #57 (196 pts) · 2026 #45 (214 pts)
Returning
21% of production · 30% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing16%45%
Receiving24%18%
Rushing19%26%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back163.000.868913.90
Defensive Line103.400.88478.85
Linebacker83.250.87176.97
Offensive Line163.190.871513.94
Quarterback53.400.88054.40
Receiver143.290.876912.28
Running Back72.710.83465.84
Special Teams102.800.81848.18

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Alessio Milivojevic · QB

CFBD athlete 5146670. Michigan State (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.26020249.0%
Pass 93.3% · Rush 11.4%

1st 42.1% · 2nd 44.6% · 3rd 66.3%

Standard downs 41.3% · Passing downs 71.9%

2024: 3★ · 0.8731
Jaziun Patterson · RB

CFBD athlete 5081332. Michigan State (2026–2026); Iowa (2022–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1968120.9%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 35.8%

1st 25.9% · 2nd 23.3% · 3rd 9.9%

Standard downs 24.4% · Passing downs 10.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8748
Camryn Edwards · RB

CFBD athlete 5086034. UConn (2022–2025); Michigan State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1576726.3%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 45.1%

1st 28.8% · 2nd 28.7% · 3rd 19.2%

Standard downs 32.5% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Marvis Parrish · RB

CFBD athlete 5258024. Western Kentucky (2025–2025); Michigan State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.053358.2%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 13.4%

1st 7.8% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 9.5% · Passing downs 4.5%

2025: 3★ · 0.8356
Liam Boyd · PK

CFBD athlete 5081440. Michigan State (2026–2026); North Carolina (2023–2024); Clemson (2022–2022); Charlotte (2025–2025)

Kicker PAAR6.88013—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Brandon Tullis · RB

CFBD athlete 5150125. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 0.8% · Rush 8.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 6.6% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Braylon Collier · WR

CFBD athlete 5215135. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 5.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Brennan Parachek · TE

CFBD athlete 4894451. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.7% · 2nd 2.7% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 5.2%

Not linked
Bryson Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 5211482. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Cam Fancher · QB

CFBD athlete 4700135. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 7.9% · Rush 4.3%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Carson Gulker · TE

CFBD athlete 4911541. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 1.2% · Rush 5.2%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 6.1%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Charles Taplin · WR

CFBD athlete 5207598. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Chrishon Mccray · WR

CFBD athlete 4869599. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.2%
Pass 17.3% · Rush 2.3%

1st 6.4% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 16.5%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 13.4%

Not linked
Fredrick Moore · WR

CFBD athlete 4905609. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 14.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 6.0% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Jayden Savoury · TE

CFBD athlete 5214448. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 16.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.8% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 7.2% · Passing downs 9.0%

Not linked
KK Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5150418. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 0.6% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Kai Rios · TE

CFBD athlete 5083652. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked
Kayd Coffman · QB

CFBD athlete 5266583. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.3%
Pass 22.2% · Rush 6.0%

1st 9.4% · 2nd 17.4% · 3rd 17.2%

Standard downs 8.4% · Passing downs 25.0%

Not linked
Kenneth Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 5174993. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 13.2%

1st 10.4% · 2nd 8.6% · 3rd 5.2%

Standard downs 7.9% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Leo Hannan · QB

CFBD athlete 5164308. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——28.6%
Pass 53.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 25.0% · 2nd 25.0% · 3rd 36.4%

Standard downs 33.3% · Passing downs 20.0%

Not linked
Rodney Bullard Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5260691. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.4%
Pass 15.2% · Rush 0.8%

1st 7.3% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 6.6% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Samson Gash · WR

CFBD athlete 5277125. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Zion Gist · RB

CFBD athlete 5215030. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 12.5%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 28 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex Weeks · PNorthern Arizona2026-01-19— / —Immediate
Ben Murawski · OTUConn2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Caleb Wheatland · LBAuburn2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cam Edwards · RBUConn2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cam Fancher · QBUCF2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cam Stodghill · SNot reported2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carlos Hazelwood · DLToledo2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carson Gulker · TEFerris State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Charles Brantley · CBMiami2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Devin Vaught · SMaine2026-01-043★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dion Crawford · LBBuffalo2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Eli Coenen · DLIllinois2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Fredrick Moore · WRMichigan2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaziun Patterson · RBIowa2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
KK Smith · WRNotre Dame2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Keahnist Thompson · EDGEWeber State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kenneth Williams · RBNebraska2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kenny Soares Jr. · LBNC State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Liam Boyd · KCharlotte2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Michael Richard · SLouisiana Tech2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nick Duzansky · LSOregon2026-01-18— / —Immediate
Nick Sharpe · IOLSouth Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Rhys Dakin · PIowa2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Robert Wright Jr. · OTGeorgia Southern2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tre Bell · CBIowa State2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Trent Fraley · IOLNorth Dakota State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Trey Lisle · EDGESoutheast Missouri State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tyran Chappell · CBHouston Christian2026-01-043★ / 0.8400Immediate
Outgoing · 46 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ade Willie · CBNorth Carolina2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Aidan Chiles · QBNorthwestern2026-01-074★ / 0.9000Immediate
Aisea Moa · LBMichigan2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Alante Brown · WRMemphis2026-01-144★ / —Immediate
Alex VanSumeren · DLUSC2026-01-063★ / 0.8900Immediate
Armoni Rue · CBUL Monroe2026-01-222★ / 0.7900Immediate
Armorion Smith · SToledo2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ashton Lepo · OTOklahoma State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Aydan West · CBMinnesota2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Chance Rucker · CBArizona State2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Charlton Luniewski · IOLSan Diego State2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Chrishon McCray · WRNot reported2026-01-072★ / —Withdrawn
Cole Dellinger · IOLEastern Michigan2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cooper Terpstra · IOLUCF2026-01-042★ / —Immediate
Darius Snow · LBTexas2026-04-163★ / 0.8500TBD
David Santiago · EDGEKansas2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dyson Sims · ATHNot reported2026-01-082★ / —Immediate
Elisha West · CBMinnesota2026-01-063★ / 0.8300Immediate
Evan Boyd · WRIowa State2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Gavin Broscious · IOLIowa State2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
George Mullins · SDelaware2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jack Wills · LSNebraska2026-01-113★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jalen Thompson · EDGEArizona State2026-01-133★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jeremiah Hughes · CBHawai'i2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justin Bell · OTVirginia Tech2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Justin Denson Jr. · SPurdue2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kaden Schickel · LSVanderbilt2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Kristian Phillips · IOLBoston College2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Makhi Frazier · RBOle Miss2026-01-193★ / 0.8800Immediate
Marcellius Pulliam · LBCoastal Carolina2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Martin Connington · KKansas2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Mercer Luniewski · OTSan Diego State2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Michael Masunas · TETexas2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nick Marsh · WRIndiana2026-01-044★ / 0.9400Immediate
Payton Stewart · OTColorado State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Rashawn Rogers · OTFerris State2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Rodney Bullard Jr. · WRNot reported2026-01-17— / —Immediate
Rustin Young · OTNot reported2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Withdrawn
Ryland Jessee · QBNot reported2025-12-313★ / —Immediate
Semaj Bridgeman · LBNot reported2025-12-124★ / —Immediate
Shawn Foster · WRCentral Michigan2026-01-112★ / 0.7900Immediate
Stanton Ramil · OTAuburn2026-01-073★ / 0.8800Immediate
Stone Chaney · EDGEMemphis2026-01-123★ / 0.8000Immediate
Tracy Revels · SUConn2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Tyler Gillison · EDGEOhio2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Wyatt Hook · TEAkron2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Michigan State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Pat Fitzgerald · career 110–101 across 18 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 21 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Pat Fitzgerald · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2025 · Jonathan Smith

    9–15 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2023-11-25. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2023–2023 · Harlon Barnett · interim

    2–8 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2023-09-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2020–2023 · Mel Tucker

    20–14 · 34 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2020-02-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2007–2019 · Mark Dantonio

    114–57 · 171 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Hired 2006-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2003–2006 · John Smith

    22–26 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2002-12-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2002–2002 · Morris Watts

    1–2 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2002-11-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2000–2002 · Bobby Williams

    15–17 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 1999-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1995–1999 · Nick Saban

    34–24–1 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1983–1994 · George Perles

    73–62–4 · 139 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1980–1982 · Frank Waters

    10–23 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1976–1979 · Darryl Rogers

    24–18–2 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1973–1975 · Dennis Stolz

    19–13–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1954–1972 · Duffy Daugherty

    109–69–5 · 183 attributed games · 19 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1947–1953 · Biggie Munn

    54–9–2 · 65 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1944–1946 · Charlie Bachman

    16–9–1 · 26 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1933–1942 · Charlie Bachman

    54–25–9 · 88 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1929–1932 · Jimmy Crowley

    22–8–3 · 33 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1928–1928 · Harry Kipke

    3–4–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1925–1927 · Ralph Young

    10–14–1 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1918–1918 · George Gauthier

    4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Pat Fitzgerald · incomplete attribution0–0——-1.12.845—
2025 · Jonathan Smith4–81–80–0-3.4-0.357—
2024 · Jonathan Smith5–73–60–0-4.6-2.842—
2023 · Mel Tucker · incomplete attribution2–0——-6.8-3.224—
2023 · Harlon Barnett · incomplete attribution2–8——-6.8-3.224—
2022 · Mel Tucker5–73–60–01.21.124—
2021 · Mel Tucker11–27–21–011.211.1439
2020 · Mel Tucker2–52–50–0-2.4-4.543—
2019 · Mark Dantonio7–64–51–07.25.132—
2018 · Mark Dantonio7–65–40–111.56.231—
2017 · Mark Dantonio10–37–21–013.812.83615
2016 · Mark Dantonio3–91–80–07.41.117—
2015 · Mark Dantonio12–28–10–115.614236
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:15:23 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play127 / 1388.0113 / 13818.2
Success rate81 / 13841.6115 / 13816.8
Explosiveness136 / 1381.542 / 13870.1
Standard-down success104 / 13824.8T113 / 13817.9
Passing-down success64 / 13854.0115 / 13816.8
Pass PPA120 / 13813.198 / 13829.2
Rush PPA122 / 13811.779 / 13843.1
Pass explosiveness128 / 1387.398 / 13829.2
Rush explosiveness125 / 1389.522 / 13884.7
Line yards102 / 13826.391 / 13834.3
Second-level yards134 / 1382.984 / 13839.4
Open-field yards135 / 1382.284 / 13839.4
Stuff rate70 / 13849.648 / 13865.7
Power successT81 / 13841.266 / 13852.6
Havoc97 / 13829.9T110 / 13820.1
Front-seven havocT104 / 13824.5T105 / 13823.0
DB havocT82 / 13838.3T84 / 13838.3
Points / opportunity109 / 13821.277 / 13844.5
Average field positionT20 / 13885.4103 / 13825.5
Field-position expected pointsT28 / 13879.9T89 / 13835.0

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Alessio Milivojevic · QBUsage 49.0% · Avg PPA 0.072 · Total 15.951
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07215.95149.0%
Pass0.10320.14293.3%
Rush-0.025-0.68511.4%
1st down-0.149-12.23842.1%
2nd down0.35923.66844.6%
3rd down0.1096.63766.3%
Standard downs-0.062-8.71441.3%
Passing downs0.30124.66571.9%
Leo Hannan · QBUsage 28.6% · Avg PPA -0.223 · Total -3.567
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.223-3.56728.6%
Pass0.0160.24153.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.978-5.87025.0%
2nd down0.1290.64725.0%
3rd down0.1360.54636.4%
Standard downs-0.066-0.79333.3%
Passing downs-0.694-2.77420.0%
Camryn Edwards · RBUsage 26.3% · Avg PPA 0.007 · Total 0.498
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0070.49826.3%
Pass0.1831.0985.2%
Rush-0.009-0.60045.1%
1st down0.0672.28428.8%
2nd down-0.009-0.23428.7%
3rd down0.2732.72819.2%
Standard downs0.0110.70432.5%
Passing downs-0.029-0.2069.7%
Jaziun Patterson · RBUsage 20.9% · Avg PPA 0.140 · Total 11.914
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.14011.91420.9%
Pass0.3152.8354.8%
Rush0.1199.07935.8%
1st down0.22510.11025.9%
2nd down0.0832.58423.3%
3rd down-0.183-1.4649.9%
Standard downs0.18013.47224.4%
Passing downs-0.156-1.55810.0%
Kayd Coffman · QBUsage 13.3% · Avg PPA -0.562 · Total -10.115
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.562-10.11513.3%
Pass-0.610-8.53822.2%
Rush-0.394-1.5766.0%
1st down-0.218-1.0909.4%
2nd down-0.773-6.18817.4%
3rd down-0.567-2.83717.2%
Standard downs-0.350-2.7978.4%
Passing downs-0.732-7.31725.0%
Chrishon Mccray · WRUsage 9.2% · Avg PPA 0.187 · Total 8.792
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1878.7929.2%
Pass0.2269.25317.3%
Rush-0.077-0.4612.3%
1st down0.2713.7886.4%
2nd down1.00013.0017.7%
3rd down-0.158-2.69316.5%
Standard downs0.0330.9557.7%
Passing downs0.4357.83713.4%
Kenneth Williams · RBUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA -0.271 · Total -6.498
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.271-6.4988.4%
Pass0.0410.2043.7%
Rush-0.353-6.70313.2%
1st down-0.263-3.42210.4%
2nd down-0.295-2.3578.6%
3rd down-0.240-0.7205.2%
Standard downs-0.259-4.4047.9%
Passing downs-0.299-2.0949.7%
Marvis Parrish · RBUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA -0.305 · Total -12.791
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.305-12.7918.2%
Pass-0.274-1.9173.0%
Rush-0.311-10.87413.4%
1st down-0.005-0.0917.8%
2nd down-0.349-4.1917.1%
3rd down-0.022-0.23910.7%
Standard downs-0.396-14.2389.5%
Passing downs0.2411.4474.5%
Jayden Savoury · TEUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.319 · Total 12.447
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.31912.4477.6%
Pass0.31912.44716.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1232.0867.8%
2nd down0.3214.4978.3%
3rd down0.4042.4225.8%
Standard downs0.1975.3237.2%
Passing downs0.5947.1249.0%
Rodney Bullard Jr. · WRUsage 7.4% · Avg PPA 0.292 · Total 11.080
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.29211.0807.4%
Pass0.30611.00515.2%
Rush0.0380.0760.8%
1st down-0.031-0.4957.3%
2nd down0.6918.9847.7%
3rd down0.5553.8886.8%
Standard downs0.0380.9386.6%
Passing downs0.78010.1429.7%
Fredrick Moore · WRUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.204 · Total 6.921
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2046.9216.7%
Pass0.2046.92114.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2744.1126.8%
2nd down-0.134-1.3436.0%
3rd down1.3297.9745.8%
Standard downs0.2154.9356.1%
Passing downs0.1811.9868.2%
Cam Fancher · QBUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA -0.182 · Total -4.011
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.182-4.0116.4%
Pass-0.250-2.9947.9%
Rush0.4093.2744.3%
1st down0.1481.6287.5%
2nd down-0.707-4.9476.2%
3rd down1.1573.4704.3%
Standard downs-0.071-1.2116.7%
Passing downs-0.560-2.8005.4%
Brandon Tullis · RBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.342 · Total 4.100
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3424.1004.5%
Pass0.3370.3370.8%
Rush0.3423.7638.0%
1st down-0.241-0.9653.5%
2nd down0.5553.3336.6%
3rd down-0.607-0.6072.0%
Standard downs0.0450.3604.1%
Passing downs0.9353.7405.3%
Zion Gist · RBUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA -0.605 · Total -1.814
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.605-1.8144.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.605-1.8147.0%
1st down-1.053-1.0533.1%
2nd down-1.460-1.4604.3%
3rd down0.6980.6987.1%
Standard downs-1.053-1.0531.8%
Passing downs-0.381-0.76212.5%
Samson Gash · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA -0.147 · Total -0.294
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.147-0.2943.6%
Pass-0.147-0.2947.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.147-0.29410.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.409-0.4092.8%
Passing downs0.1150.1155.0%
Charles Taplin · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 1.576 · Total 6.303
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.5766.3033.2%
Pass1.5766.3037.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0142.0293.4%
2nd down1.1301.1302.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.0533.1593.1%
Passing downs3.1443.1443.6%
Carson Gulker · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.064 · Total 0.319
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0640.3193.0%
Pass1.0061.0061.2%
Rush-0.172-0.6875.2%
1st down-0.235-0.4712.8%
2nd down-0.045-0.0451.8%
3rd down0.4180.8356.1%
Standard downs0.0640.3194.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Bryson Williams · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.010 · Total 0.078
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0100.0782.5%
Pass0.0100.0785.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.609-1.2191.4%
2nd down2.9055.8101.9%
3rd down-0.204-0.6134.5%
Standard downs-0.357-1.7832.1%
Passing downs0.6201.8613.7%
Braylon Collier · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.452 · Total 1.355
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4521.3552.4%
Pass0.4521.3555.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7721.5443.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.189-0.1894.2%
Standard downs0.7721.5442.0%
Passing downs-0.189-0.1893.6%
Brennan Parachek · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.840 · Total 5.882
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8405.8822.1%
Pass0.8405.8824.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9500.9500.7%
2nd down-0.524-1.5732.7%
3rd down2.1696.5064.5%
Standard downs0.4920.9830.9%
Passing downs0.9804.8995.2%
Kai Rios · TEUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.003 · Total -0.017
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.003-0.0171.9%
Pass-0.003-0.0174.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0980.0980.9%
2nd down-0.249-0.7463.5%
3rd down0.6310.6312.0%
Standard downs0.2160.8642.1%
Passing downs-0.881-0.8811.4%
KK Smith · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.793 · Total 2.378
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7932.3781.4%
Pass0.7932.3783.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.508-0.5081.2%
2nd down1.0711.0711.4%
3rd down1.8151.8152.0%
Standard downs-0.508-0.5080.6%
Passing downs1.4432.8863.8%
Where Michigan State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.023 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.421 (42nd percentile; 138 teams)42ndOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.065 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.042 (13th percentile; 138 teams)13thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.036 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.165 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.444 (17th percentile; 138 teams)17thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.175 (70th percentile; 138 teams)70thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.136 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20th
Values and percentiles
Michigan State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0238th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.42142nd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.0651st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.04213th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.03612th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.16518th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.44417th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.17570th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13620th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 222 attempts charted. Average depth of target 7.6 yards (20th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.1 per completion. Completion 64.4%, 6.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.12.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense63.9%62.7%+1.2219 / 222
Defense allowed61.3%62.1%-0.8212 / 214

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Michigan State.

Target mix by zone, Michigan State offense
Short left34% · 73Short middle16% · 35Short right41% · 87Deep left5% · 10Deep middle1% · 2Deep right3% · 6

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Michigan State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense22299%7.64.164.4%0.12+1.2 pp219
Passing defense21499%8.15.161.2%0.31-0.8 pp212

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2813.242.0%0.023.000.800.5016.1%71.1%
Defense allowed2954.146.6%0.103.101.000.8018.4%72.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense280 / 281278324221255 / 255 · 100.0%
Defense allowed292 / 295286912560276 / 277 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.2 pp. 8 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-18.60.519.5W1W1 vs Toledo: +16.7 ppW2W2 vs Eastern Michigan: +3.4 ppW3W3 vs Notre Dame: -6.4 ppW4W4 vs Nebraska: +4.5 ppW5W5 vs Wisconsin: -18.6 ppW6W6 vs Illinois: +19.5 ppW7W7 vs Northwestern: -0.5 ppW8W8 vs UCLA: -10.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Toledo343476.5%59.8%+16.7 pp8.10.53493.1-0.17
W2Eastern Michigan262466.7%63.2%+3.4 pp6.70.35455.70.36
W3Notre Dame181850.0%56.4%-6.4 pp12.4-0.14271.60.03
W4Nebraska282867.9%63.4%+4.5 pp7.80.18321.30.03
W5Wisconsin343447.1%65.7%-18.6 pp5.4-0.53452.8-0.13
W6Illinois272684.6%65.1%+19.5 pp5.40.74274.70.28
W7Northwestern303063.3%63.8%-0.5 pp8.70.07273.30.13
W8UCLA252552.0%62.5%-10.5 pp8.3-0.28291.6-0.35

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

26 punts · 47.5 gross yards/punt · 41.6 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 6 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 26/26 punts. Known net yards: 22/26 punts.

Our punt returns

10 returns · 13.1 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 10/10 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · UCLA743.340.06/7
Week 7 · Northwestern348.040.03/3
Week 6 · Illinois264.554.52/2
Week 5 · Wisconsin454.541.54/4
Week 4 · Nebraska250.544.52/2
Team style
Rating history