Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Michigan

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Michigan's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 35 across 8 systems; best 25, worst 51, so they disagree by 26 places.

Lab EPA
#36
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#40
up 62026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#27
down 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#25
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#34
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#26
up 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#51
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#37
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#46 of 138
Schedule strength
#37 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#20 of 138
Game control
#49 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#47 of 138
Offense
#66 of 138
Defense
#18 of 138
Special teams
#133 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Michigan · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.077 net EPA/play

#36

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

6.07 points

#40 · Up 6 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +3.30 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +3.56, schedule #11 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +6.86 on its own; the preseason prior of +3.69 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +6.07.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Michigan · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Western Michigan
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858428
+1.00 → +1.00-2.500.76379.44%+0.84-0.1420.079-0.063
Week 2 · Oklahoma
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856679
+7.00 → +7.00-2.500.79379.81%+6.470.4410.6341.076
Week 3 · UTEP
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858450
+35.00 → +35.00-2.500.824910.19%-16.913.313-1.7241.589
Week 4 · Iowa
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858463
-1.00 → -1.00-2.500.857210.59%+6.88-0.3710.7290.358
Week 5 · Minnesota
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858474
-6.00 → -6.00+2.500.890911.01%-0.24-0.385-0.027-0.412
Week 7 · Penn State
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858490
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.962211.89%+7.110.0590.8450.905
Week 8 · Indiana
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858496
-7.00 → -1.00 (OT)-2.501.000012.36%+17.33-0.4322.1411.709

Game terms +5.16 points; prior term +0.91 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +6.07 points. The preseason prior is +3.69 with 24.71% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

11.5 SP+ points

#27 · Down 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

11.06 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#26 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -1.94 on 397 plays; defense -13.00 on 407 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Michigan 4 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 1-3 · home 4-2 · away 0-1 · expected wins 4.7
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4 ATS (-5.0 avg) · 2025: 4-9 ATS (-2.3 avg)
Head coach
Kyle Whittingham · hired 2025-12-27 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #16 (262 pts) · 2025 #6 (291 pts) · 2026 #12 (270 pts)
Returning
69% of production · 71% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing104%99%
Receiving60%46%
Rushing59%67%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back143.640.904612.66
Defensive Line233.650.904420.80
Linebacker123.420.885310.62
Offensive Line163.750.916514.66
Quarterback54.000.91604.58
Receiver153.530.904313.56
Running Back93.440.89868.09
Special Teams83.250.87517.00

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Bryce Underwood · QB

CFBD athlete 5141741. Michigan (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.26013543.6%
Pass 74.4% · Rush 21.8%

1st 39.7% · 2nd 47.2% · 3rd 44.0%

Standard downs 39.2% · Passing downs 53.9%

2025: 5★ · 0.9998
Jordan Marshall · RB

CFBD athlete 5079574. Michigan (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2168319.6%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 33.1%

1st 21.8% · 2nd 19.4% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 24.0% · Passing downs 9.4%

2024: 4★ · 0.9606
Savion Hiter · RB

CFBD athlete 5159046. Michigan (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1006617.0%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 26.8%

1st 19.0% · 2nd 16.7% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 17.9% · Passing downs 14.8%

2026: 5★ · 0.9933
Bryce Underwood · QB

CFBD athlete 5141741. Michigan (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1885543.6%
Pass 74.4% · Rush 21.8%

1st 39.7% · 2nd 47.2% · 3rd 44.0%

Standard downs 39.2% · Passing downs 53.9%

2025: 5★ · 0.9998
Trey Butkowski · PK

CFBD athlete 5296243. Michigan (2026–2026); Pittsburgh (2025–2025)

Kicker PAAR0.2908—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: 3★ · 0.8233
Andrew Marsh · WR

CFBD athlete 5141572. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.0%
Pass 28.4% · Rush 0.4%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 13.2% · 3rd 16.5%

Standard downs 9.5% · Passing downs 18.0%

Not linked
Bryson Kuzdzal · RB

CFBD athlete 5156348. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.9%

1st 7.2% · 2nd 4.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Channing Goodwin · WR

CFBD athlete 5079417. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked
Donovan Johnson · RB

CFBD athlete 5141530. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.4%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Eli Owens · TE

CFBD athlete 5141588. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 1.3%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Hogan Hansen · TE

CFBD athlete 5079494. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 12.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 8.1% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
JJ Buchanan · WR

CFBD athlete 5214557. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.0%
Pass 31.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 11.2% · 2nd 12.5% · 3rd 17.6%

Standard downs 11.8% · Passing downs 15.6%

Not linked
Jalen Hoffman · TE

CFBD athlete 5156349. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.0% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 0.6% · Passing downs 9.0%

Not linked
Mason Bonner · TE

CFBD athlete 5276673. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Salesi Moa · WR

CFBD athlete 5159013. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 0.7%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 2.8%

Not linked
Tomas O'Meara · RB

CFBD athlete 5222269. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.4%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Tommy Carr · QB

CFBD athlete 5269403. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——30.3%
Pass 55.6% · Rush 13.3%

1st 21.4% · 2nd 29.7% · 3rd 48.9%

Standard downs 21.8% · Passing downs 51.8%

Not linked
Travis Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 5209314. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 6.2% · Rush 0.9%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 1.8%

Not linked
Zack Marshall · TE

CFBD athlete 5088628. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 19 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aisea Moa · LBMichigan State2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Alex Bauman · TEMiami2026-10-143★ / —Immediate
Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi · QBColorado State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cameron Brown · PUNLV2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Chris Bracy · SMemphis2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Christian Pierce · LBMichigan2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Colin Hurley · QBLSU2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Houston Ka'aha'aina-Torres · IOLNebraska2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
JJ Buchanan · WRUtah2026-01-124★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jaime Ffrench Jr. · WRTexas2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jeremiah Earby · CBBoise State2026-10-143★ / —Immediate
John Henry Daley · EDGEUtah2026-01-094★ / 0.9300Immediate
Jonah Leaea · DLUtah2026-01-123★ / 0.8700Immediate
Max Alford · LBBYU2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nathaniel Staehling · LBNorth Dakota State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Salesi Moa · CBUtah2026-01-124★ / 0.9000Immediate
Smith Snowden · CBUtah2026-01-134★ / 0.9200Immediate
Taylor Tatum · RBOklahoma2026-01-083★ / 0.8800Immediate
Trey Butkowski · KPittsburgh2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Outgoing · 33 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Andrew Sprague · OTNot reported2026-01-074★ / —Withdrawn
Anthony Simpson · WRToledo2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Beckham Sunderland · KMinnesota2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Ben Roebuck · IOLWestern Michigan2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Brady Prieskorn · TEOle Miss2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Brandyn Hillman · SVirginia2026-01-143★ / 0.8800Immediate
Bryson Kuzdzal · RBNot reported2026-01-292★ / —Withdrawn
CJ Hester · RBStony Brook2026-01-183★ / —Immediate
Christian Pierce · LBMichigan2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Cole Sullivan · LBOklahoma2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Connor Jones · OTGeorgia State2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Davis Warren · QBStanford2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Devon Baxter · EDGEVirginia2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Elijah Dotson · CBMissouri2026-01-144★ / 0.9000Immediate
Enow Etta · DLNot reported2026-01-184★ / —Withdrawn
Evan Boutorwick · LSNorthwestern2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Fredrick Moore · WRMichigan State2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaden Mangham · SPurdue2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jadyn Davis · QBEast Tennessee State2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jake Garcia · QBNot reported2026-01-154★ / —Immediate
Jake Guarnera · IOLNot reported2026-01-124★ / 0.9200Withdrawn
Jasper Parker · RBArkansas2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jayden Sanders · CBNotre Dame2026-01-124★ / 0.9200Immediate
Jaydon Hood · LBGeorgia State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justice Haynes · RBGeorgia Tech2026-01-144★ / 0.9500Immediate
Kaden Strayhorn · IOLAlabama2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lawrence Hattar · IOLNot reported2026-01-15— / —Withdrawn
Mikey Keene · QBArizona State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Semaj Morgan · WRUCLA2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
TJ Metcalf · STennessee2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tevis Metcalf · CBTennessee2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ty Haywood · OTAlabama2026-01-124★ / 0.9000Immediate
Zeke Berry · CBNot reported2026-01-023★ / 0.8700Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Michigan. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Kyle Whittingham · career 177–88 across 23 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 22 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Kyle Whittingham · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Biff Poggi · interim

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-10. Effective dates: 2025-12-31 to unknown.

  3. 2024–2025 · Sherrone Moore

    17–8 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-01-26. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-31.

  4. 2015–2023 · Jim Harbaugh

    89–25 · 114 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Hired 2014-12-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2011–2014 · Brady Hoke

    31–20 · 51 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2011-01-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2008–2010 · Rich Rodriguez

    15–22 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2007-12-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1995–2007 · Lloyd Carr

    122–40 · 162 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1990–1994 · Gary Moeller

    44–13–3 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1969–1989 · Bo Schembechler

    194–48–5 · 247 attributed games · 21 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1959–1968 · Bump Elliott

    51–42–2 · 95 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1948–1958 · Bennie Oosterbaan

    63–33–4 · 100 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1938–1947 · Fritz Crisler

    71–16–3 · 90 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1929–1937 · Harry Kipke

    46–26–4 · 76 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1927–1928 · Tad Wieman

    9–6–1 · 16 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1925–1926 · Fielding Yost

    14–2 · 16 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1924–1924 · George Little

    6–2 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1901–1923 · Fielding Yost

    151–27–10 · 188 attributed games · 23 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1900–1900 · Biff Lea

    7–2–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1897–1899 · Gustave Ferbert

    24–3–1 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1896–1896 · William Ward

    9–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1894–1895 · William McCauley

    17–2–1 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1892–1893 · Frank Barbour

    14–8 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Kyle Whittingham · incomplete attribution0–0——135.312—
2025 · Biff Poggi0–10–00–112.411621
2025 · Sherrone Moore9–37–20–012.411621
2024 · Sherrone Moore8–55–41–010.68.916—
2023 · Jim Harbaugh15–010–02–031.325.9171
2022 · Jim Harbaugh13–110–00–13221.193
2021 · Jim Harbaugh12–29–10–123.418.3103
2020 · Jim Harbaugh2–42–40–010.7-0.614—
2019 · Jim Harbaugh9–46–30–120.718.1818
2018 · Jim Harbaugh10–38–10–1221922—
2017 · Jim Harbaugh8–55–40–119.612.95—
2016 · Jim Harbaugh10–37–20–124.424.1810
2015 · Jim Harbaugh10–36–21–019.717.53712
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:16:14 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play111 / 13819.75 / 13897.1
Success rate104 / 13824.811 / 13892.7
Explosiveness116 / 13816.19 / 13894.2
Standard-down success126 / 1388.814 / 13890.5
Passing-down success28 / 13880.313 / 13891.2
Pass PPA102 / 13826.39 / 13894.2
Rush PPA100 / 13827.710 / 13893.4
Pass explosiveness92 / 13833.654 / 13861.3
Rush explosiveness92 / 13833.68 / 13894.9
Line yards96 / 13830.720 / 13886.1
Second-level yards130 / 1385.85 / 13897.1
Open-field yards127 / 1388.02 / 13899.3
Stuff rate44 / 13868.654 / 13861.3
Power success67 / 13851.8T26 / 13881.0
HavocT117 / 13814.2T62 / 13854.7
Front-seven havocT93 / 13832.134 / 13875.9
DB havocT121 / 13811.7T101 / 13825.9
Points / opportunity125 / 1389.52 / 13899.3
Average field positionT79 / 13840.5T86 / 13836.1
Field-position expected pointsT71 / 13848.594 / 13832.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Bryce Underwood · QBUsage 43.6% · Avg PPA 0.076 · Total 13.990
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07613.99043.6%
Pass0.15520.29774.4%
Rush0.0271.40121.8%
1st down-0.323-22.90939.7%
2nd down0.32321.94347.2%
3rd down0.44617.83044.0%
Standard downs-0.187-21.72539.2%
Passing downs0.51835.71453.9%
Tommy Carr · QBUsage 30.3% · Avg PPA 0.117 · Total 7.027
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1177.02730.3%
Pass-0.022-0.99655.6%
Rush0.5358.02213.3%
1st down0.0571.01921.4%
2nd down0.1182.23529.7%
3rd down0.1182.60348.9%
Standard downs-0.034-1.04921.8%
Passing downs0.2788.07651.8%
Jordan Marshall · RBUsage 19.6% · Avg PPA 0.152 · Total 12.643
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.15212.64319.6%
Pass0.2681.0732.3%
Rush0.14611.57033.1%
1st down-0.059-2.31121.8%
2nd down0.1594.45219.4%
3rd down0.6439.00015.4%
Standard downs0.18613.17724.0%
Passing downs-0.045-0.5359.4%
Savion Hiter · RBUsage 17.0% · Avg PPA -0.021 · Total -1.518
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.021-1.51817.0%
Pass0.5064.0494.5%
Rush-0.087-5.56626.8%
1st down-0.177-6.02519.0%
2nd down0.1212.91616.7%
3rd down0.1141.59115.4%
Standard downs-0.082-4.33717.9%
Passing downs0.1482.82014.8%
JJ Buchanan · WRUsage 13.0% · Avg PPA 0.578 · Total 31.778
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.57831.77813.0%
Pass0.57831.77831.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1082.15611.2%
2nd down0.80014.39812.5%
3rd down1.19219.07717.6%
Standard downs0.1786.22711.8%
Passing downs1.27825.55015.6%
Andrew Marsh · WRUsage 12.0% · Avg PPA 0.285 · Total 14.534
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.28514.53412.0%
Pass0.23611.78428.4%
Rush2.7502.7500.4%
1st down0.0510.8198.9%
2nd down0.4548.62613.2%
3rd down0.1992.98116.5%
Standard downs0.41411.6009.5%
Passing downs0.1282.93418.0%
Hogan Hansen · TEUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA 0.471 · Total 6.118
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4716.1185.3%
Pass0.4716.11812.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.088-0.4405.0%
2nd down0.8205.7418.1%
3rd down0.8170.8171.8%
Standard downs-0.088-0.4403.0%
Passing downs0.8206.55710.0%
Bryson Kuzdzal · RBUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.168 · Total 2.523
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1682.5234.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1682.5237.9%
1st down0.0770.7687.2%
2nd down0.3511.7554.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.052-0.6705.7%
Passing downs1.5973.1932.1%
Jalen Hoffman · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.117 · Total 0.933
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1170.9333.2%
Pass0.1170.9337.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.1531.1531.0%
2nd down-0.001-0.0037.1%
3rd down-0.217-0.2171.8%
Standard downs1.1531.1530.6%
Passing downs-0.031-0.2209.0%
Travis Johnson · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA -0.023 · Total -0.138
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.023-0.1383.0%
Pass0.1050.5246.2%
Rush-0.662-0.6620.9%
1st down-0.841-2.5243.6%
2nd down-0.662-0.6621.6%
3rd down0.5020.5022.2%
Standard downs-0.128-0.6403.5%
Passing downs0.5020.5021.8%
Salesi Moa · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA -0.030 · Total -0.211
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.030-0.2112.7%
Pass0.0510.3085.2%
Rush-0.519-0.5190.7%
1st down-0.333-0.6651.8%
2nd down-0.882-2.6453.4%
3rd down1.5503.1003.6%
Standard downs-0.662-3.3112.6%
Passing downs1.5503.1002.8%
Channing Goodwin · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 1.525 · Total 4.575
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.5254.5752.5%
Pass1.5254.5755.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.347-0.3472.5%
3rd down2.4614.9236.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.5254.5757.9%
Zack Marshall · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -1.066 · Total -1.066
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.066-1.0662.0%
Pass-1.066-1.0664.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.066-1.0665.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.066-1.0663.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Mason Bonner · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -1.104 · Total -1.104
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.104-1.1041.7%
Pass-1.104-1.1045.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.104-1.1045.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.104-1.1042.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Donovan Johnson · RBUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.890 · Total -0.890
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.890-0.8901.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.890-0.8902.4%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.890-0.8904.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.890-0.8901.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Eli Owens · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.196 · Total 0.392
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1960.3921.4%
Pass0.0310.0311.8%
Rush0.3610.3611.3%
1st down0.1960.3923.2%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1960.3921.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tomas O'Meara · RBUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.042 · Total 0.042
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0420.0421.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.0420.0422.4%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.0420.0424.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.0420.0427.1%
Where Michigan sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.047 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.403 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.148 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.110 (26th percentile; 138 teams)26thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.042 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.106 (97th percentile; 138 teams)97thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.344 (93rd percentile; 138 teams)93rdDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.087 (94th percentile; 138 teams)94thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.162 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55th
Values and percentiles
Michigan metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.04720th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40325th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.14816th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.11026th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.04228th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.10697th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.34493rd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.08794th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16255th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 98% of 167 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.3 yards (86th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.6 per completion. Completion 59.3%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.17.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense59.8%58.7%+1.1164 / 167
Defense allowed60.8%63.6%-2.7189 / 191

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Michigan.

Target mix by zone, Michigan offense
Short left26% · 41Short middle15% · 24Short right44% · 69Deep left4% · 7Deep middle3% · 4Deep right8% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Michigan passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense16798%10.34.659.3%0.17+1.1 pp164
Passing defense19199%7.64.260.7%-0.07-2.7 pp189

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2533.840.3%0.062.900.800.7014.3%73.3%
Defense allowed2362.834.6%-0.072.600.700.3018.9%64.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense246 / 253244913220238 / 238 · 100.0%
Defense allowed233 / 236229715440217 / 217 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.1 pp. 7 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-12.03.518.9W1W1 vs Western Michigan: -4.6 ppW2W2 vs Oklahoma: -10.8 ppW3W3 vs UTEP: +18.9 ppW4W4 vs Iowa: +6.5 ppW5W5 vs Minnesota: -12.0 ppW7W7 vs Penn State: -3.0 ppW8W8 vs Indiana: +2.2 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Western Michigan232152.4%57.0%-4.6 pp14.00.20254.40.16
W2Oklahoma171752.9%63.8%-10.8 pp8.10.15413.90.06
W3UTEP282777.8%58.8%+18.9 pp9.30.79424.40.23
W4Iowa282860.7%54.3%+6.5 pp12.60.60403.8-0.20
W5Minnesota212147.6%59.6%-12.0 pp9.4-0.60282.80.11
W7Penn State181855.6%58.5%-3.0 pp12.4-0.30356.20.38
W8Indiana323262.5%60.3%+2.2 pp7.30.03421.5-0.24

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

35 punts · 42.1 gross yards/punt · 40.0 net yards/punt

10 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 35/35 punts. Known net yards: 27/35 punts.

Our punt returns

10 returns · 6.4 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

2 muffs · 2 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 10/10 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Indiana543.443.33/5
Week 7 · Penn State636.735.73/6
Week 5 · Minnesota643.235.56/6
Week 4 · Iowa442.539.33/4
Week 3 · UTEP145.045.01/1
Team style
Rating history