Record
5-3 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
SP+ workbook record2026 season
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
Miami (OH)'s rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 93 across 8 systems; best 71, worst 114, so they disagree by 43 places.
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Results earned and schedule difficulty
Performance by unit
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Miami (OH) · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
5-3 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
SP+ workbook record-0.057 net EPA/play
#92
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD plays-4.52 points
#94 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +2.56 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -7.98, schedule #128 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -5.82. That is worth -5.42 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.32 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -4.52.
Miami (OH) · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · Pittsburgh away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858207 | -45.00 → -35.00 | +2.50 | 0.7637 | 8.47% | +4.19 | -2.752 | 0.355 | -2.397 |
| Week 2 · Holy Cross home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866417 | +38.00 → +35.00 | -2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.80% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 2.860 | -2.200 | 0.660 |
| Week 3 · Cincinnati away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856797 | -4.00 → -4.00 | +2.50 | 0.8249 | 9.15% | +3.52 | -0.137 | 0.322 | 0.184 |
| Week 4 · UConn home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401861970 | +3.00 → +3.00 | -2.50 | 0.8572 | 9.51% | +0.47 | 0.048 | 0.045 | 0.092 |
| Week 5 · Bowling Green home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866477 | -4.00 → -4.00 | -2.50 | 0.8909 | 9.88% | -11.98 | -0.642 | -1.184 | -1.826 |
| Week 6 · Massachusetts away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866440 | +1.00 → +1.00 | +2.50 | 0.9259 | 10.27% | -8.38 | 0.359 | -0.860 | -0.501 |
| Week 7 · Akron home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866478 | +20.00 → +20.00 | -2.50 | 0.9622 | 10.67% | -16.43 | 1.867 | -1.753 | 0.114 |
| Week 8 · Central Michigan away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866476 | +1.00 → +1.00 | +2.50 | 1.0000 | 11.09% | -8.47 | 0.388 | -0.939 | -0.551 |
Game terms -4.22 points; prior term -0.29 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -4.52 points. The preseason prior is -1.32 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scores-4.2 SP+ points
#92 · Up 2 places
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbook-0.47 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#71 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -0.23 on 388 plays; defense 0.24 on 433 plays.
2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Miami (OH) 2 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence| Category | Production | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Passing | -2% | 24% |
| Receiving | 13% | 31% |
| Rushing | 33% | 32% |
Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 7 | 3.00 | 0.8374 | 5.86 |
| Defensive Line | 13 | 2.92 | 0.8340 | 10.84 |
| Linebacker | 8 | 3.00 | 0.8397 | 6.72 |
| Offensive Line | 16 | 2.88 | 0.8255 | 13.21 |
| Quarterback | 3 | 3.00 | 0.8473 | 2.54 |
| Receiver | 13 | 3.00 | 0.8401 | 10.92 |
| Running Back | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8421 | 4.21 |
| Special Teams | 12 | 3.00 | 0.8330 | 10.00 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caleb Heavner · QBCFBD athlete 5388435. Miami (OH) (2026–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.021 | 113 | 36.9% | Pass 58.9% · Rush 18.2%1st 29.7% · 2nd 38.2% · 3rd 54.3% Standard downs 30.7% · Passing downs 49.3% | Not linked |
David McComb · QBCFBD athlete 5141549. Miami (OH) (2026–2026); Kansas (2025–2025) | Passing WEPA | 0.466 | 95 | 51.1% | Pass 92.9% · Rush 12.4%1st 48.2% · 2nd 50.0% · 3rd 61.7% Standard downs 41.4% · Passing downs 72.6% | 2025: 3★ · 0.8794 |
Rodney Nelson · RBCFBD athlete 5153885. Miami (OH) (2026–2026); Monmouth (2023–2025) | Rushing WEPA | 0.118 | 74 | 16.4% | Pass 1.4% · Rush 31.1%1st 21.4% · 2nd 19.7% · 3rd 1.1% Standard downs 20.2% · Passing downs 8.9% | Not linked |
D'Shawntae Jones · RBCFBD athlete 5193270. Miami (OH) (2024–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.031 | 51 | 12.4% | Pass 1.8% · Rush 22.8%1st 11.2% · 2nd 12.9% · 3rd 11.8% Standard downs 14.8% · Passing downs 7.6% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8428 |
Caleb Heavner · QBCFBD athlete 5388435. Miami (OH) (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.344 | 37 | 36.9% | Pass 58.9% · Rush 18.2%1st 29.7% · 2nd 38.2% · 3rd 54.3% Standard downs 30.7% · Passing downs 49.3% | Not linked |
Kellan McLaughlin · PKCFBD athlete 5151442. Miami (OH) (2023–2026) | Kicker PAAR | -3.380 | 14 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | Not linked |
Brady Stidham · PKCFBD athlete 5291147. Miami (OH) (2026–2026) | Kicker PAAR | 0.520 | 1 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2026: 3★ · 0.8178 |
Brady Simmons · WRCFBD athlete 5104821. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.8% | Not linked |
Braylon Isom · WRCFBD athlete 5141795. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.4% | Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.0%1st 5.7% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 11.8% Standard downs 5.9% · Passing downs 7.5% | Not linked |
Brendan Loftus · TECFBD athlete 5209576. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.2% | Pass 6.2% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.6% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 3.3% | Not linked |
Cade Yacamelli · RBCFBD athlete 4869341. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.8% | Pass 2.9% · Rush 6.7%1st 3.6% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 12.8% Standard downs 4.5% · Passing downs 5.2% | Not linked |
Carl Jenkins Jr. · WRCFBD athlete 5164357. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.0% | Pass 4.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.3% Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 1.1% | Not linked |
Chancellor Sparks · RBCFBD athlete 5210049. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 14.3% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 20.5%1st 9.4% · 2nd 25.0% · 3rd 12.5% Standard downs 13.3% · Passing downs 18.2% | Not linked |
Christian Ross · TECFBD athlete 4871003. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.0% | Pass 8.9% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.0% · 2nd 6.4% · 3rd 2.9% Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 5.0% | Not linked |
Damarion Witten · WRCFBD athlete 5079772. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.1% | Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.0%1st 8.0% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 2.2% Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 5.7% | Not linked |
Lazaro Rogers · RBCFBD athlete 5214639. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.7% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 12.9%1st 8.9% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 2.5% Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 4.5% | Not linked |
Lynel Billups-Williams · WRCFBD athlete 5085354. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.8% | Pass 16.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 8.0% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 6.5% Standard downs 7.3% · Passing downs 8.9% | Not linked |
Maleek Huggins · WRCFBD athlete 4876642. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.6% | Pass 16.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.0% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 21.5% Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 13.9% | Not linked |
Quintin Simmons Jr. · WRCFBD athlete 5148609. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.8% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Scoop Smith · WRCFBD athlete 5293035. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.1% | Pass 10.9% · Rush 2.1%1st 5.4% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 5.4% Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 7.0% | Not linked |
Tristan Reed · WRCFBD athlete 5292857. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.8% | Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amariyun Knighten · CB | Indiana | 2026-03-02 | — / — | Immediate |
| Ben Minich · S | Notre Dame | 2026-01-08 | 4★ / — | Immediate |
| Blayne Myrick · LB | South Alabama | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Brian Beidatsch Jr. · OT | Duquesne | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Cade Yacamelli · RB | Wisconsin | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Damarion Witten · WR | Ohio State | 2026-01-16 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| David McComb · QB | Kansas | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Devin Hyatt · WR | Arizona | 2026-01-16 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Devontae Armstrong · IOL | Ohio State | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Dillon Tatum · S | Northwestern | 2026-01-06 | 4★ / — | Immediate |
| Evan Malcore · OT | Northern Illinois | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Marcus Moore Jr. · DL | Purdue | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Mason Ellens · CB | Iowa State | 2026-01-22 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Mikah Coleman · EDGE | Cincinnati | 2026-02-11 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Rodney Nelson · RB | Monmouth | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Shaun Shahu · OT | Saginaw Valley State | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Trick · EDGE | Texas Tech | 2026-01-07 | 4★ / 0.9000 | Immediate |
| Cole Weaver · WR | Syracuse | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Cordale Russell · WR | Stephen F. Austin | 2026-02-02 | 4★ / — | Immediate |
| Drew Terrill · OT | Houston | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Jameil Hamm · EDGE | Not reported | 2026-01-01 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jayden Fuller · LB | South Carolina State | 2026-02-04 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Josh Lukusa · EDGE | Missouri State | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Kam Perry · WR | Colorado | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Khory Moss · CB | Akron | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Koy Beasley · S | Kansas State | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Luke Evans · CB | Kennesaw State | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Mychal Yharbrough · CB | Not reported | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Withdrawn |
| Noah Ehrlich · QB | Not reported | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Tito Glass Jr. · RB | Not reported | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Continuous appointments at Miami (OH). Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Chuck Martin · career 72–74 across 13 seasons and 1 schools
2014–present · Chuck Martin · active at capture
72–74 · 146 attributed games · 13 seasons
Hired 2013-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2013–2013 · Mike Bath
0–7 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2013-10-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2011–2013 · Don Treadwell
8–21 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2010-12-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2010–2010 · Lance Guidry
1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2010-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2009–2010 · Michael Haywood
10–15 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2008-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2005–2008 · Shane Montgomery
17–31 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 2004-12-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.
1999–2004 · Terry Hoeppner
48–25 · 73 attributed games · 6 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1990–1998 · Randy Walker
58–36–5 · 99 attributed games · 9 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1983–1989 · Tim Rose
31–44–3 · 78 attributed games · 7 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1978–1982 · Tom Reed
34–19–2 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1974–1977 · Dick Crum
34–10–1 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1969–1973 · Bill Mallory
39–12 · 51 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1963–1968 · Bo Schembechler
40–17–3 · 60 attributed games · 6 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1962–1962 · John Pont
8–2–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Chuck Martin · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | -4 | -8.1 | 105 | — |
| 2025 · Chuck Martin | 7–7 | 6–2 | 0–1 | -3.4 | -5.6 | 83 | — |
| 2024 · Chuck Martin | 9–5 | 7–2 | 1–0 | 1.3 | -0.1 | 82 | — |
| 2023 · Chuck Martin | 11–3 | 8–1 | 0–1 | 2.8 | -1.2 | 105 | — |
| 2022 · Chuck Martin | 6–7 | 4–4 | 0–1 | -12.7 | -12.2 | 77 | — |
| 2021 · Chuck Martin | 7–6 | 5–3 | 1–0 | 1.5 | -1.9 | 88 | — |
| 2020 · Chuck Martin | 2–1 | 2–1 | 0–0 | -12.9 | — | 89 | — |
| 2019 · Chuck Martin | 8–6 | 7–2 | 0–1 | -9.2 | -7 | 89 | — |
| 2018 · Chuck Martin | 6–6 | 6–2 | 0–0 | -0.7 | -2.2 | 130 | — |
| 2017 · Chuck Martin | 5–7 | 4–4 | 0–0 | -2.2 | -8.4 | 94 | — |
| 2016 · Chuck Martin | 6–7 | 6–2 | 0–1 | -6.1 | -7.1 | 93 | — |
| 2015 · Chuck Martin | 3–9 | 2–6 | 0–0 | -13.5 | -19.3 | 74 | — |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:22 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 67 / 138 | 51.8 | 89 / 138 | 35.8 |
| Success rate | 99 / 138 | 28.5 | 88 / 138 | 36.5 |
| Explosiveness | 6 / 138 | 96.4 | 96 / 138 | 30.7 |
| Standard-down success | 100 / 138 | 27.7 | 73 / 138 | 47.4 |
| Passing-down success | T83 / 138 | 39.8 | 118 / 138 | 14.6 |
| Pass PPA | 62 / 138 | 55.5 | 111 / 138 | 19.7 |
| Rush PPA | 33 / 138 | 76.6 | 33 / 138 | 76.6 |
| Pass explosiveness | 16 / 138 | 89.1 | 71 / 138 | 48.9 |
| Rush explosiveness | 21 / 138 | 85.4 | 50 / 138 | 64.2 |
| Line yards | 41 / 138 | 70.8 | 18 / 138 | 87.6 |
| Second-level yards | 37 / 138 | 73.7 | 32 / 138 | 77.4 |
| Open-field yards | 34 / 138 | 75.9 | 39 / 138 | 72.3 |
| Stuff rate | 74 / 138 | 46.7 | 23 / 138 | 83.9 |
| Power success | T75 / 138 | 44.2 | 24 / 138 | 83.2 |
| Havoc | T83 / 138 | 38.7 | T103 / 138 | 24.8 |
| Front-seven havoc | T108 / 138 | 20.8 | T103 / 138 | 25.2 |
| DB havoc | T38 / 138 | 72.3 | 80 / 138 | 42.3 |
| Points / opportunity | 100 / 138 | 27.7 | 112 / 138 | 19.0 |
| Average field position | T15 / 138 | 89.4 | T25 / 138 | 82.1 |
| Field-position expected points | 17 / 138 | 88.3 | T25 / 138 | 82.1 |
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.656 | 78.711 | 51.1% |
| Pass | 0.663 | 69.594 | 92.9% |
| Rush | 0.959 | 13.423 | 12.4% |
| 1st down | 0.815 | 44.801 | 48.2% |
| 2nd down | -0.052 | -1.757 | 50.0% |
| 3rd down | 1.079 | 31.284 | 61.7% |
| Standard downs | 0.863 | 57.791 | 41.4% |
| Passing downs | 0.395 | 20.919 | 72.6% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.001 | 0.223 | 36.9% |
| Pass | -0.148 | -16.697 | 58.9% |
| Rush | 0.621 | 24.204 | 18.2% |
| 1st down | -0.146 | -8.487 | 29.7% |
| 2nd down | 0.045 | 2.268 | 38.2% |
| 3rd down | 0.316 | 13.889 | 54.3% |
| Standard downs | -0.309 | -26.304 | 30.7% |
| Passing downs | 0.384 | 26.527 | 49.3% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.005 | 0.353 | 16.4% |
| Pass | 0.016 | 0.047 | 1.4% |
| Rush | 0.004 | 0.306 | 31.1% |
| 1st down | -0.011 | -0.539 | 21.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.053 | 1.534 | 19.7% |
| 3rd down | -0.642 | -0.642 | 1.1% |
| Standard downs | -0.014 | -0.904 | 20.2% |
| Passing downs | 0.090 | 1.257 | 8.9% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.201 | -1.604 | 14.3% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.201 | -1.604 | 20.5% |
| 1st down | -0.490 | -1.469 | 9.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.177 | 0.707 | 25.0% |
| 3rd down | -0.842 | -0.842 | 12.5% |
| Standard downs | -0.101 | -0.605 | 13.3% |
| Passing downs | -0.499 | -0.999 | 18.2% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.119 | -7.009 | 12.4% |
| Pass | -0.389 | -1.557 | 1.8% |
| Rush | -0.099 | -5.452 | 22.8% |
| 1st down | -0.209 | -5.218 | 11.2% |
| 2nd down | -0.050 | -0.959 | 12.9% |
| 3rd down | -0.043 | -0.475 | 11.8% |
| Standard downs | -0.114 | -5.372 | 14.8% |
| Passing downs | -0.136 | -1.637 | 7.6% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.353 | 13.044 | 7.8% |
| Pass | 0.353 | 13.044 | 16.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.432 | 7.777 | 8.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.011 | -0.135 | 8.2% |
| 3rd down | 0.371 | 2.225 | 6.5% |
| Standard downs | 0.127 | 2.910 | 7.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.724 | 10.134 | 8.9% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.017 | 36.629 | 7.6% |
| Pass | 1.017 | 36.629 | 16.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.407 | 12.665 | 4.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.382 | 2.672 | 4.8% |
| 3rd down | 1.065 | 21.292 | 21.5% |
| Standard downs | 1.234 | 17.271 | 4.4% |
| Passing downs | 0.880 | 19.357 | 13.9% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.109 | 2.948 | 6.7% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.109 | 2.948 | 12.9% |
| 1st down | 0.123 | 2.099 | 8.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.278 | 2.227 | 6.5% |
| 3rd down | -0.689 | -1.378 | 2.5% |
| Standard downs | 0.179 | 3.766 | 7.7% |
| Passing downs | -0.136 | -0.818 | 4.5% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.097 | 2.630 | 6.4% |
| Pass | 0.097 | 2.630 | 13.2% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.294 | -3.231 | 5.7% |
| 2nd down | -0.662 | -3.308 | 3.8% |
| 3rd down | 0.796 | 7.963 | 11.8% |
| Standard downs | -0.400 | -6.404 | 5.9% |
| Passing downs | 0.821 | 9.034 | 7.5% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.808 | 23.425 | 6.1% |
| Pass | 0.808 | 23.425 | 13.2% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.733 | 13.201 | 8.0% |
| 2nd down | 1.192 | 9.540 | 5.4% |
| 3rd down | 1.919 | 3.838 | 2.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.774 | 15.471 | 6.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.884 | 7.954 | 5.7% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.579 | 16.785 | 6.1% |
| Pass | 0.336 | 8.059 | 10.9% |
| Rush | 1.745 | 8.726 | 2.1% |
| 1st down | 0.905 | 10.866 | 5.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.514 | 6.172 | 8.2% |
| 3rd down | -0.051 | -0.253 | 5.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.679 | 12.214 | 5.7% |
| Passing downs | 0.416 | 4.571 | 7.0% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.113 | 1.243 | 4.8% |
| Pass | -0.077 | -0.230 | 2.9% |
| Rush | 0.184 | 1.473 | 6.7% |
| 1st down | -0.497 | -1.987 | 3.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.536 | 0.536 | 1.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.449 | 2.694 | 12.8% |
| Standard downs | 0.134 | 0.936 | 4.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.077 | 0.307 | 5.2% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.176 | 2.467 | 4.0% |
| Pass | 0.176 | 2.467 | 8.9% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.935 | 4.673 | 3.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.537 | -3.759 | 6.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.776 | 1.553 | 2.9% |
| Standard downs | 0.757 | 6.056 | 3.4% |
| Passing downs | -0.598 | -3.589 | 5.0% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.848 | 6.784 | 3.2% |
| Pass | 0.848 | 6.784 | 6.2% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.568 | 6.274 | 3.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.127 | 0.510 | 5.2% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 1.258 | 6.290 | 3.2% |
| Passing downs | 0.164 | 0.493 | 3.3% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.336 | 8.016 | 2.0% |
| Pass | 1.336 | 8.016 | 4.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.356 | 4.068 | 2.1% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | 1.316 | 3.947 | 5.3% |
| Standard downs | 1.140 | 5.699 | 2.4% |
| Passing downs | 2.316 | 2.316 | 1.1% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.403 | -0.403 | 1.8% |
| Pass | -0.403 | -0.403 | 6.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.403 | -0.403 | 3.1% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.403 | -0.403 | 2.2% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.051 | 0.051 | 1.7% |
| Pass | 0.051 | 0.051 | 2.6% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.051 | 0.051 | 5.3% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.051 | 0.051 | 3.8% |
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.201 | -0.401 | 1.7% |
| Pass | -0.201 | -0.401 | 3.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.674 | -0.674 | 1.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.273 | 0.273 | 2.9% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.201 | -0.401 | 2.6% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.142 | 52nd138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.406 | 28th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.391 | 96th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | 0.229 | 55th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.177 | 77th138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | 0.113 | 36th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.420 | 36th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.270 | 31st138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.140 | 25th138 teams | higher |
Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 206 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.5 yards (89th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.6 per completion. Completion 58.7%, 8.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.34.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 55.6% | 57.7% | -2.1 | 189 / 206 |
| Defense allowed | 64.2% | 59.3% | +4.9 | 257 / 286 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Miami (OH).
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 206 | 100% | 10.5 | 6.6 | 58.7% | 0.34 | -2.1 pp | 189 |
| Passing defense | 286 | 99% | 10.2 | 4.5 | 63.6% | 0.35 | +4.9 pp | 257 |
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 258 | 4.5 | 42.6% | 0.18 | 3.20 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 15.7% | 71.4% |
| Defense allowed | 227 | 3.4 | 41.5% | -0.01 | 2.70 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 20.8% | 63.4% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 252 / 258 | 248 | 10 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 235 / 235 · 100.0% |
| Defense allowed | 221 / 227 | 217 | 10 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 207 / 207 · 100.0% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.1 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Pittsburgh | 37 | 36 | 50.0% | 62.0% | -12.0 pp | 9.6 | 0.24 | 21 | 1.2 | -0.14 |
| W2 | Holy Cross | 15 | 0 | — | — | — | 6.4 | 1.35 | 39 | 5.3 | 0.21 |
| W3 | Cincinnati | 28 | 28 | 60.7% | 53.4% | +7.3 pp | 14.8 | 0.68 | 28 | 2.8 | -0.01 |
| W4 | UConn | 32 | 31 | 67.7% | 57.2% | +10.5 pp | 9.8 | 0.68 | 29 | 3.0 | -0.14 |
| W5 | Bowling Green | 24 | 24 | 70.8% | 57.3% | +13.5 pp | 8.7 | 0.56 | 34 | 3.5 | 0.10 |
| W6 | Massachusetts | 21 | 21 | 28.6% | 56.3% | -27.8 pp | 10.8 | -0.06 | 36 | 4.6 | 0.29 |
| W7 | Akron | 16 | 16 | 50.0% | 60.9% | -10.9 pp | 9.7 | -0.61 | 35 | 9.3 | 0.64 |
| W8 | Central Michigan | 33 | 33 | 54.5% | 56.5% | -2.0 pp | 12.2 | -0.10 | 36 | 3.9 | 0.27 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
34 punts · 44.1 gross yards/punt · 37.9 net yards/punt
14 inside the 20 · 7 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 34/34 punts. Known net yards: 31/34 punts.
8 returns · 8.3 yards/return · 1 touchdowns
0 muffs · 2 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 · Central Michigan | 4 | 45.8 | 38.0 | 4/4 |
| Week 7 · Akron | 4 | 45.8 | 42.0 | 3/4 |
| Week 6 · Massachusetts | 7 | 42.0 | 39.1 | 7/7 |
| Week 5 · Bowling Green | 4 | 46.8 | 40.0 | 4/4 |
| Week 4 · UConn | 2 | 44.5 | 34.5 | 2/2 |