Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Miami (OH)

2026 season

Mid-American
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Miami (OH)'s rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 93 across 8 systems; best 71, worst 114, so they disagree by 43 places.

Lab EPA
#92
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#94
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#92
up 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#114
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#104
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#71
up 2 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#100
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#92
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#86 of 138
Schedule strength
#111 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#115 of 138
Game control
#86 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#95 of 138
Offense
#89 of 138
Defense
#105 of 138
Special teams
#19 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Miami (OH) · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

5-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.057 net EPA/play

#92

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-4.52 points

#94 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +2.56 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -7.98, schedule #128 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -5.82. That is worth -5.42 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.32 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -4.52.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Miami (OH) · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Pittsburgh
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858207
-45.00 → -35.00+2.500.76378.47%+4.19-2.7520.355-2.397
Week 2 · Holy Cross
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866417
+38.00 → +35.00-2.500.79378.80%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.860-2.2000.660
Week 3 · Cincinnati
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856797
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.82499.15%+3.52-0.1370.3220.184
Week 4 · UConn
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401861970
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.85729.51%+0.470.0480.0450.092
Week 5 · Bowling Green
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866477
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.89099.88%-11.98-0.642-1.184-1.826
Week 6 · Massachusetts
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866440
+1.00 → +1.00+2.500.925910.27%-8.380.359-0.860-0.501
Week 7 · Akron
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866478
+20.00 → +20.00-2.500.962210.67%-16.431.867-1.7530.114
Week 8 · Central Michigan
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866476
+1.00 → +1.00+2.501.000011.09%-8.470.388-0.939-0.551

Game terms -4.22 points; prior term -0.29 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -4.52 points. The preseason prior is -1.32 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-4.2 SP+ points

#92 · Up 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-0.47 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#71 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -0.23 on 388 plays; defense 0.24 on 433 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Miami (OH) 2 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
5-3 · conf 3-1 · home 3-1 · away 2-2 · expected wins 4.9
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (-2.9 avg) · 2025: 8-6 ATS (+0.4 avg)
Head coach
Chuck Martin · hired 2013-12-03 · 27-15 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #82 (165 pts) · 2025 #83 (164 pts) · 2026 #105 (176 pts)
Returning
14% of production · 29% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-2%24%
Receiving13%31%
Rushing33%32%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back73.000.83745.86
Defensive Line132.920.834010.84
Linebacker83.000.83976.72
Offensive Line162.880.825513.21
Quarterback33.000.84732.54
Receiver133.000.840110.92
Running Back53.000.84214.21
Special Teams123.000.833010.00

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Caleb Heavner · QB

CFBD athlete 5388435. Miami (OH) (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.02111336.9%
Pass 58.9% · Rush 18.2%

1st 29.7% · 2nd 38.2% · 3rd 54.3%

Standard downs 30.7% · Passing downs 49.3%

Not linked
David McComb · QB

CFBD athlete 5141549. Miami (OH) (2026–2026); Kansas (2025–2025)

Passing WEPA0.4669551.1%
Pass 92.9% · Rush 12.4%

1st 48.2% · 2nd 50.0% · 3rd 61.7%

Standard downs 41.4% · Passing downs 72.6%

2025: 3★ · 0.8794
Rodney Nelson · RB

CFBD athlete 5153885. Miami (OH) (2026–2026); Monmouth (2023–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1187416.4%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 31.1%

1st 21.4% · 2nd 19.7% · 3rd 1.1%

Standard downs 20.2% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
D'Shawntae Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5193270. Miami (OH) (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0315112.4%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 22.8%

1st 11.2% · 2nd 12.9% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 14.8% · Passing downs 7.6%

2024: 3★ · 0.8428
Caleb Heavner · QB

CFBD athlete 5388435. Miami (OH) (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3443736.9%
Pass 58.9% · Rush 18.2%

1st 29.7% · 2nd 38.2% · 3rd 54.3%

Standard downs 30.7% · Passing downs 49.3%

Not linked
Kellan McLaughlin · PK

CFBD athlete 5151442. Miami (OH) (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR-3.38014—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Brady Stidham · PK

CFBD athlete 5291147. Miami (OH) (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.5201—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2026: 3★ · 0.8178
Brady Simmons · WR

CFBD athlete 5104821. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Braylon Isom · WR

CFBD athlete 5141795. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 5.9% · Passing downs 7.5%

Not linked
Brendan Loftus · TE

CFBD athlete 5209576. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Cade Yacamelli · RB

CFBD athlete 4869341. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 6.7%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 12.8%

Standard downs 4.5% · Passing downs 5.2%

Not linked
Carl Jenkins Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5164357. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 4.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 1.1%

Not linked
Chancellor Sparks · RB

CFBD athlete 5210049. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——14.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 20.5%

1st 9.4% · 2nd 25.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 13.3% · Passing downs 18.2%

Not linked
Christian Ross · TE

CFBD athlete 4871003. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 8.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 6.4% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Damarion Witten · WR

CFBD athlete 5079772. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Lazaro Rogers · RB

CFBD athlete 5214639. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 12.9%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Lynel Billups-Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 5085354. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.8%
Pass 16.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 7.3% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
Maleek Huggins · WR

CFBD athlete 4876642. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 16.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 21.5%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 13.9%

Not linked
Quintin Simmons Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5148609. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Scoop Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5293035. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 10.9% · Rush 2.1%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 5.4%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 7.0%

Not linked
Tristan Reed · WR

CFBD athlete 5292857. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 16 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amariyun Knighten · CBIndiana2026-03-02— / —Immediate
Ben Minich · SNotre Dame2026-01-084★ / —Immediate
Blayne Myrick · LBSouth Alabama2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Brian Beidatsch Jr. · OTDuquesne2026-01-093★ / 0.8300Immediate
Cade Yacamelli · RBWisconsin2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Damarion Witten · WROhio State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
David McComb · QBKansas2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Devin Hyatt · WRArizona2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Devontae Armstrong · IOLOhio State2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dillon Tatum · SNorthwestern2026-01-064★ / —Immediate
Evan Malcore · OTNorthern Illinois2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Marcus Moore Jr. · DLPurdue2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Mason Ellens · CBIowa State2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mikah Coleman · EDGECincinnati2026-02-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Rodney Nelson · RBMonmouth2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Shaun Shahu · OTSaginaw Valley State2026-01-083★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 14 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Trick · EDGETexas Tech2026-01-074★ / 0.9000Immediate
Cole Weaver · WRSyracuse2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cordale Russell · WRStephen F. Austin2026-02-024★ / —Immediate
Drew Terrill · OTHouston2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jameil Hamm · EDGENot reported2026-01-013★ / —Immediate
Jayden Fuller · LBSouth Carolina State2026-02-043★ / —Immediate
Josh Lukusa · EDGEMissouri State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kam Perry · WRColorado2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Khory Moss · CBAkron2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Koy Beasley · SKansas State2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Luke Evans · CBKennesaw State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mychal Yharbrough · CBNot reported2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Withdrawn
Noah Ehrlich · QBNot reported2026-01-153★ / —Immediate
Tito Glass Jr. · RBNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Miami (OH). Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Chuck Martin · career 72–74 across 13 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 14 appointments
  1. 2014–present · Chuck Martin · active at capture

    72–74 · 146 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Hired 2013-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2013–2013 · Mike Bath

    0–7 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2013-10-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2011–2013 · Don Treadwell

    8–21 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2010-12-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2010–2010 · Lance Guidry

    1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2010-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2009–2010 · Michael Haywood

    10–15 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2008-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2005–2008 · Shane Montgomery

    17–31 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1999–2004 · Terry Hoeppner

    48–25 · 73 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1990–1998 · Randy Walker

    58–36–5 · 99 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1983–1989 · Tim Rose

    31–44–3 · 78 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1978–1982 · Tom Reed

    34–19–2 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1974–1977 · Dick Crum

    34–10–1 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1969–1973 · Bill Mallory

    39–12 · 51 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1963–1968 · Bo Schembechler

    40–17–3 · 60 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1962–1962 · John Pont

    8–2–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Chuck Martin · incomplete attribution0–0——-4-8.1105—
2025 · Chuck Martin7–76–20–1-3.4-5.683—
2024 · Chuck Martin9–57–21–01.3-0.182—
2023 · Chuck Martin11–38–10–12.8-1.2105—
2022 · Chuck Martin6–74–40–1-12.7-12.277—
2021 · Chuck Martin7–65–31–01.5-1.988—
2020 · Chuck Martin2–12–10–0-12.9—89—
2019 · Chuck Martin8–67–20–1-9.2-789—
2018 · Chuck Martin6–66–20–0-0.7-2.2130—
2017 · Chuck Martin5–74–40–0-2.2-8.494—
2016 · Chuck Martin6–76–20–1-6.1-7.193—
2015 · Chuck Martin3–92–60–0-13.5-19.374—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:22 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play67 / 13851.889 / 13835.8
Success rate99 / 13828.588 / 13836.5
Explosiveness6 / 13896.496 / 13830.7
Standard-down success100 / 13827.773 / 13847.4
Passing-down successT83 / 13839.8118 / 13814.6
Pass PPA62 / 13855.5111 / 13819.7
Rush PPA33 / 13876.633 / 13876.6
Pass explosiveness16 / 13889.171 / 13848.9
Rush explosiveness21 / 13885.450 / 13864.2
Line yards41 / 13870.818 / 13887.6
Second-level yards37 / 13873.732 / 13877.4
Open-field yards34 / 13875.939 / 13872.3
Stuff rate74 / 13846.723 / 13883.9
Power successT75 / 13844.224 / 13883.2
HavocT83 / 13838.7T103 / 13824.8
Front-seven havocT108 / 13820.8T103 / 13825.2
DB havocT38 / 13872.380 / 13842.3
Points / opportunity100 / 13827.7112 / 13819.0
Average field positionT15 / 13889.4T25 / 13882.1
Field-position expected points17 / 13888.3T25 / 13882.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

David McComb · QBUsage 51.1% · Avg PPA 0.656 · Total 78.711
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65678.71151.1%
Pass0.66369.59492.9%
Rush0.95913.42312.4%
1st down0.81544.80148.2%
2nd down-0.052-1.75750.0%
3rd down1.07931.28461.7%
Standard downs0.86357.79141.4%
Passing downs0.39520.91972.6%
Caleb Heavner · QBUsage 36.9% · Avg PPA 0.001 · Total 0.223
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0010.22336.9%
Pass-0.148-16.69758.9%
Rush0.62124.20418.2%
1st down-0.146-8.48729.7%
2nd down0.0452.26838.2%
3rd down0.31613.88954.3%
Standard downs-0.309-26.30430.7%
Passing downs0.38426.52749.3%
Rodney Nelson · RBUsage 16.4% · Avg PPA 0.005 · Total 0.353
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0050.35316.4%
Pass0.0160.0471.4%
Rush0.0040.30631.1%
1st down-0.011-0.53921.4%
2nd down0.0531.53419.7%
3rd down-0.642-0.6421.1%
Standard downs-0.014-0.90420.2%
Passing downs0.0901.2578.9%
Chancellor Sparks · RBUsage 14.3% · Avg PPA -0.201 · Total -1.604
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.201-1.60414.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.201-1.60420.5%
1st down-0.490-1.4699.4%
2nd down0.1770.70725.0%
3rd down-0.842-0.84212.5%
Standard downs-0.101-0.60513.3%
Passing downs-0.499-0.99918.2%
D'Shawntae Jones · RBUsage 12.4% · Avg PPA -0.119 · Total -7.009
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.119-7.00912.4%
Pass-0.389-1.5571.8%
Rush-0.099-5.45222.8%
1st down-0.209-5.21811.2%
2nd down-0.050-0.95912.9%
3rd down-0.043-0.47511.8%
Standard downs-0.114-5.37214.8%
Passing downs-0.136-1.6377.6%
Lynel Billups-Williams · WRUsage 7.8% · Avg PPA 0.353 · Total 13.044
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35313.0447.8%
Pass0.35313.04416.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4327.7778.0%
2nd down-0.011-0.1358.2%
3rd down0.3712.2256.5%
Standard downs0.1272.9107.3%
Passing downs0.72410.1348.9%
Maleek Huggins · WRUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 1.017 · Total 36.629
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.01736.6297.6%
Pass1.01736.62916.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.40712.6654.0%
2nd down0.3822.6724.8%
3rd down1.06521.29221.5%
Standard downs1.23417.2714.4%
Passing downs0.88019.35713.9%
Lazaro Rogers · RBUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.109 · Total 2.948
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1092.9486.7%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1092.94812.9%
1st down0.1232.0998.9%
2nd down0.2782.2276.5%
3rd down-0.689-1.3782.5%
Standard downs0.1793.7667.7%
Passing downs-0.136-0.8184.5%
Braylon Isom · WRUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA 0.097 · Total 2.630
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0972.6306.4%
Pass0.0972.63013.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.294-3.2315.7%
2nd down-0.662-3.3083.8%
3rd down0.7967.96311.8%
Standard downs-0.400-6.4045.9%
Passing downs0.8219.0347.5%
Damarion Witten · WRUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.808 · Total 23.425
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.80823.4256.1%
Pass0.80823.42513.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.73313.2018.0%
2nd down1.1929.5405.4%
3rd down1.9193.8382.2%
Standard downs0.77415.4716.3%
Passing downs0.8847.9545.7%
Scoop Smith · WRUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.579 · Total 16.785
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.57916.7856.1%
Pass0.3368.05910.9%
Rush1.7458.7262.1%
1st down0.90510.8665.4%
2nd down0.5146.1728.2%
3rd down-0.051-0.2535.4%
Standard downs0.67912.2145.7%
Passing downs0.4164.5717.0%
Cade Yacamelli · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA 0.113 · Total 1.243
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1131.2434.8%
Pass-0.077-0.2302.9%
Rush0.1841.4736.7%
1st down-0.497-1.9873.6%
2nd down0.5360.5361.4%
3rd down0.4492.69412.8%
Standard downs0.1340.9364.5%
Passing downs0.0770.3075.2%
Christian Ross · TEUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.176 · Total 2.467
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1762.4674.0%
Pass0.1762.4678.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9354.6733.0%
2nd down-0.537-3.7596.4%
3rd down0.7761.5532.9%
Standard downs0.7576.0563.4%
Passing downs-0.598-3.5895.0%
Brendan Loftus · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.848 · Total 6.784
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8486.7843.2%
Pass0.8486.7846.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.5686.2743.6%
2nd down0.1270.5105.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.2586.2903.2%
Passing downs0.1640.4933.3%
Carl Jenkins Jr. · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 1.336 · Total 8.016
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.3368.0162.0%
Pass1.3368.0164.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3564.0682.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.3163.9475.3%
Standard downs1.1405.6992.4%
Passing downs2.3162.3161.1%
Tristan Reed · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA -0.403 · Total -0.403
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.403-0.4031.8%
Pass-0.403-0.4036.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.403-0.4033.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.403-0.4032.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Brady Simmons · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.051 · Total 0.051
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0510.0511.7%
Pass0.0510.0512.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.0510.0515.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.0510.0513.8%
Quintin Simmons Jr. · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.201 · Total -0.401
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.201-0.4011.7%
Pass-0.201-0.4013.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.674-0.6741.8%
2nd down0.2730.2732.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.201-0.4012.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Miami (OH) sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.142 (52nd percentile; 138 teams)52ndOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.406 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.391 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.229 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.177 (77th percentile; 138 teams)77thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.113 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.420 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.270 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.140 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25th
Values and percentiles
Miami (OH) metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.14252nd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40628th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.39196th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.22955th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.17777th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.11336th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42036th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.27031st138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14025th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 206 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.5 yards (89th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.6 per completion. Completion 58.7%, 8.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.34.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense55.6%57.7%-2.1189 / 206
Defense allowed64.2%59.3%+4.9257 / 286

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Miami (OH).

Target mix by zone, Miami (OH) offense
Short left33% · 66Short middle7% · 14Short right38% · 76Deep left11% · 22Deep middle4% · 7Deep right8% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Miami (OH) passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense206100%10.56.658.7%0.34-2.1 pp189
Passing defense28699%10.24.563.6%0.35+4.9 pp257

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2584.542.6%0.183.201.201.3015.7%71.4%
Defense allowed2273.441.5%-0.012.700.900.8020.8%63.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense252 / 2582481019440235 / 235 · 100.0%
Defense allowed221 / 2272171016240207 / 207 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.1 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-27.8-7.113.5W1W1 vs Pittsburgh: -12.0 ppW2W3W3 vs Cincinnati: +7.3 ppW4W4 vs UConn: +10.5 ppW5W5 vs Bowling Green: +13.5 ppW6W6 vs Massachusetts: -27.8 ppW7W7 vs Akron: -10.9 ppW8W8 vs Central Michigan: -2.0 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Pittsburgh373650.0%62.0%-12.0 pp9.60.24211.2-0.14
W2Holy Cross150———6.41.35395.30.21
W3Cincinnati282860.7%53.4%+7.3 pp14.80.68282.8-0.01
W4UConn323167.7%57.2%+10.5 pp9.80.68293.0-0.14
W5Bowling Green242470.8%57.3%+13.5 pp8.70.56343.50.10
W6Massachusetts212128.6%56.3%-27.8 pp10.8-0.06364.60.29
W7Akron161650.0%60.9%-10.9 pp9.7-0.61359.30.64
W8Central Michigan333354.5%56.5%-2.0 pp12.2-0.10363.90.27

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

34 punts · 44.1 gross yards/punt · 37.9 net yards/punt

14 inside the 20 · 7 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 34/34 punts. Known net yards: 31/34 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 8.3 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

0 muffs · 2 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Central Michigan445.838.04/4
Week 7 · Akron445.842.03/4
Week 6 · Massachusetts742.039.17/7
Week 5 · Bowling Green446.840.04/4
Week 4 · UConn244.534.52/2
Team style
Rating history