Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Massachusetts

2026 season

Mid-American
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Massachusetts's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 114.5 across 8 systems; best 91, worst 129, so they disagree by 38 places.

Lab EPA
#91
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#116
down 82026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#113
down 142026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#129
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#124
down 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#102
down 20 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#121
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#91
down 152026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#120 of 138
Schedule strength
#138 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#123 of 138
Game control
#112 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#109 of 138
Offense
#121 of 138
Defense
#87 of 138
Special teams
#55 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Massachusetts · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.054 net EPA/play

#91

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-8.38 points

#116 · Down 8 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +4.95 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -11.85, schedule #138 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 2 FCS opponents count at −25; FBS opponents alone average -7.90. That is worth -6.90 on its own; the preseason prior of -13.58 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -8.38.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Massachusetts · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Rutgers
away · 2026-09-03 · ID 401858423
+16.00 → +16.00+2.500.76378.47%-5.701.567-0.4831.084
Week 2 · Sacred Heart
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866420
+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.79378.80%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.156-2.200-0.044
Week 3 · Stonehill
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401866424
+22.00 → +22.00-2.500.82499.15%-25.00 (fixed lower division)1.784-2.287-0.503
Week 4 · Sacramento State
away · 2026-09-27 · ID 401866429
+29.00 → +29.00+2.500.85729.51%-20.332.994-1.9321.062
Week 5 · Eastern Michigan
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866433
-24.00 → -24.00-2.500.89099.88%-9.30-2.618-0.919-3.536
Week 6 · Miami (OH)
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866440
-1.00 → -1.00-2.500.925910.27%-4.52-0.359-0.464-0.823
Week 7 · Buffalo
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866442
-7.00 → -1.00 (OT)+2.500.962210.67%-9.250.160-0.987-0.827
Week 8 · UConn
away · 2026-10-23 · ID 401861965
-19.00 → -19.00+2.501.000011.09%+0.47-1.8300.052-1.777

Game terms -5.37 points; prior term -3.01 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -8.38 points. The preseason prior is -13.58 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-11.1 SP+ points

#113 · Down 14 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-8.92 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#102 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -6.63 on 334 plays; defense 2.28 on 350 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Massachusetts 25 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 1-3 · home 2-2 · away 2-2 · expected wins 4.4
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-3-1 ATS (+3.9 avg) · 2025: 3-9 ATS (-12.2 avg)
Head coach
Joe Harasymiak · hired 2024-12-04 · 0-12 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #126 (119 pts) · 2025 #145 (37 pts) · 2026 #116 (167 pts)
Returning
-57% of production · 14% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-36%1%
Receiving-11%28%
Rushing221%15%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back43.000.84093.36
Defensive Line73.000.84655.93
Linebacker23.000.83691.67
Offensive Line73.000.82495.77
Quarterback43.000.83893.36
Receiver73.000.83685.86
Running Back33.000.84142.52
Special Teams53.000.82744.14

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
William Watson III · QB

CFBD athlete 4920153. Massachusetts (2026–2026); Virginia Tech (2023–2025)

Passing WEPA0.28311250.6%
Pass 93.5% · Rush 16.2%

1st 45.7% · 2nd 46.1% · 3rd 70.1%

Standard downs 43.5% · Passing downs 67.0%

2023: 3★ · 0.8714
Elijah Faulkner · RB

CFBD athlete 5264764. Massachusetts (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA-0.0406620.9%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 34.8%

1st 25.8% · 2nd 20.5% · 3rd 11.2%

Standard downs 24.3% · Passing downs 13.0%

2025: stars unavailable
Curtis Kimmons IV · RB

CFBD athlete 5388331. Massachusetts (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2034913.8%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 22.0%

1st 14.4% · 2nd 15.5% · 3rd 11.2%

Standard downs 15.3% · Passing downs 10.3%

Not linked
Derek Morris · PK

CFBD athlete 5218751. California (2024–2024); Massachusetts (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR1.72016—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Aedan McCarthy · QB

CFBD athlete 5327585. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——40.2%
Pass 67.3% · Rush 15.1%

1st 41.3% · 2nd 36.4% · 3rd 50.0%

Standard downs 36.0% · Passing downs 50.0%

Not linked
Dallas Elliott · WR

CFBD athlete 5091384. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 7.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Drew Alsup · WR

CFBD athlete 5327581. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Jabari Lewis · WR

CFBD athlete 5388332. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.7%
Pass 16.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.8% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 10.9%

Not linked
Jax Markovich · TE

CFBD athlete 5209127. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Jordan Washington · RB

CFBD athlete 5227849. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 15.9%

1st 9.8% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 8.7%

Standard downs 12.7% · Passing downs 2.8%

Not linked
Joseph Griffin Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 4700147. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 17.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.1% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 8.0%

Not linked
Justin Lewis · RB

CFBD athlete 5295851. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.1%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 10.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Justin Williams-Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 5081363. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 7.9%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked
Kai Owens · WR

CFBD athlete 5281382. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Kezion Dia-Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 5146743. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 2.8%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 5.1%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
Logan Inagawa · QB

CFBD athlete 5298739. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——19.9%
Pass 28.1% · Rush 13.2%

1st 17.1% · 2nd 18.2% · 3rd 26.2%

Standard downs 19.0% · Passing downs 21.9%

Not linked
Matthew Ogunniyi · TE

CFBD athlete 5132795. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Max Dowling · TE

CFBD athlete 5092954. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.7%
Pass 12.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 11.0%

Not linked
Owen Anderson · TE

CFBD athlete 4826574. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Reece Adkins · TE

CFBD athlete 4688904. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 1.6%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 5.1% · Passing downs 5.5%

Not linked
TK Davis · RB

CFBD athlete 5302869. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.5%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Tavian Dashiell · WR

CFBD athlete 5327583. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 1.5% · Rush 1.9%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Ty Harding · WR

CFBD athlete 4909541. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.5%
Pass 24.0% · Rush 2.1%

1st 11.3% · 2nd 11.5% · 3rd 13.2%

Standard downs 10.0% · Passing downs 15.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 21 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aitor Urionabarrenechea · IOLColorado State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Andrew DePaepe · EDGEIndiana2026-01-124★ / —Immediate
Aubrey Melvin · DLUConn2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Devin Matthews · WREast Texas A&M2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Grant Mills · LSOhio State2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Greg Klingensmith · OTWilliam & Mary2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Greg Knox · OTMcNeese2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Isaiah Reed · CBUCF2026-01-133★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jahmad Harmon · SBall State2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jordan Washington · RBMurray State2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Joseph Griffin Jr. · WRWisconsin2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Joshua Iseah · LBNorth Carolina A&T2026-01-113★ / 0.8300Immediate
Justin Krueger · EDGEWilliam & Mary2026-01-173★ / 0.8200Immediate
Justin Williams-Thomas · RBMarshall2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kendric Council · LBNot reported2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Khari Bendolph · LBJacksonville State2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Logan Inagawa · QBDrake2026-03-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
RJ Johnson III · QBFlorida A&M2026-01-173★ / 0.8000Immediate
William DePaepe · EDGEIndiana2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
William Watson III · QBVirginia Tech2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Zachary Betts · EDGENot reported2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 19 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
AJ Hairston · QBMerrimack2026-01-153★ / —Immediate
Brandon Hood · RBSouthern Miss2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Brandon Rose · QBUtah2026-06-013★ / —Immediate
Brennen Bailey · CBLamar2026-01-22— / —Immediate
Cookie Desiderio · LBTemple2026-01-163★ / 0.8200Immediate
David Onuoha · EDGENorth Texas2026-01-273★ / 0.8300Immediate
Donovan Dyson · EDGENot reported2025-12-033★ / —Immediate
Grant Jordan · QBOklahoma State2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jacquon Gibson · WRVirginia2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jenoa Alford · WRNot reported2026-01-04— / —Immediate
Kendall Bournes · SNot reported2026-01-303★ / 0.8200Withdrawn
Kenyon Massey · WRNot reported2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Malachi Madison · DLMissouri State2026-01-133★ / 0.8200Immediate
Marques White · EDGESMU2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nick Hawthorne · EDGENot reported2025-12-123★ / —Immediate
Paul Tchio · IOLNot reported2026-01-014★ / —Immediate
Rashad Henry · LBUCF2026-01-113★ / 0.8300Immediate
Shambre Jackson · EDGENot reported2026-01-153★ / —Immediate
Tyree Kelly · WRNot reported2025-12-07— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Massachusetts. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Joe Harasymiak · career 0–12 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 11 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Joe Harasymiak · active at capture

    0–12 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Shane Montgomery · interim

    0–2 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2024-11-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2022–2024 · Don Brown

    6–28 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-11-22. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2021–2021 · Alex Miller

    0–3 · 3 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-11-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2019–2021 · Walt Bell

    2–23 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2018-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2014–2018 · Mark Whipple

    16–44 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2014-01-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2012–2013 · Charley Molnar

    2–22 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2011-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1906–1906 · George O'Hearn

    1–7–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1905–1905 · Walter Craig

    3–7 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1904–1904 · Matthew Bullock

    5–2–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1901–1903 · James Halligan

    15–8–2 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Joe Harasymiak · incomplete attribution0–0——-6.5-14116—
2025 · Joe Harasymiak0–120–80–0-36.6-32.3145—
2024 · Shane Montgomery · incomplete attribution0–2——-21.9-17.4126—
2024 · Don Brown · incomplete attribution2–8——-21.9-17.4126—
2023 · Don Brown3–91–10–0-17.5-15.2127—
2022 · Don Brown1–110–30–0-30.3-23.8117—
2021 · Walt Bell · incomplete attribution1–8——-29.3-19.7117—
2021 · Alex Miller · incomplete attribution0–3——-29.3-19.7117—
2020 · Walt Bell0–40–00–0-31.3-26.2100—
2019 · Walt Bell1–110–00–0-34.6-40.6113—
2018 · Mark Whipple4–80–00–0-16.1-18.4108—
2017 · Mark Whipple4–80–00–0-9.7-10.3110—
2016 · Mark Whipple2–100–00–0-15.3-1786—
2015 · Mark Whipple3–92–60–0-9.5-14.7107—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:25:15 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play77 / 13844.536 / 13874.5
Success rate88 / 13836.550 / 13864.2
Explosiveness97 / 13829.919 / 13886.9
Standard-down success75 / 13846.054 / 13861.3
Passing-down success113 / 13818.246 / 13867.2
Pass PPA59 / 13857.738 / 13873.0
Rush PPA74 / 13846.751 / 13863.5
Pass explosiveness89 / 13835.870 / 13849.6
Rush explosiveness77 / 13844.511 / 13892.7
Line yards50 / 13864.2103 / 13825.5
Second-level yards75 / 13846.046 / 13867.2
Open-field yards96 / 13830.743 / 13869.3
Stuff rate40 / 13871.592 / 13833.6
Power successT123 / 13810.6T52 / 13862.0
HavocT49 / 13863.5T79 / 13842.7
Front-seven havocT40 / 13871.2T109 / 13820.1
DB havocT68 / 13850.430 / 13878.8
Points / opportunityT65 / 13852.921 / 13885.4
Average field position78 / 13843.8T86 / 13836.1
Field-position expected points75 / 13846.077 / 13844.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

William Watson III · QBUsage 50.6% · Avg PPA 0.323 · Total 55.555
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.32355.55550.6%
Pass0.27939.88593.5%
Rush0.54015.66916.2%
1st down0.0926.37845.7%
2nd down0.52227.66246.1%
3rd down0.53925.34570.1%
Standard downs0.32733.71043.5%
Passing downs0.31721.84567.0%
Aedan McCarthy · QBUsage 40.2% · Avg PPA -0.032 · Total -1.395
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.032-1.39540.2%
Pass0.1103.84967.3%
Rush-0.655-5.24415.1%
1st down-0.017-0.31541.3%
2nd down-0.241-2.88936.4%
3rd down0.1511.80950.0%
Standard downs-0.136-3.67636.0%
Passing downs0.1432.28150.0%
Elijah Faulkner · RBUsage 20.9% · Avg PPA -0.133 · Total -13.307
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.133-13.30720.9%
Pass0.2122.7626.0%
Rush-0.185-16.06934.8%
1st down-0.240-12.95925.8%
2nd down0.0130.41820.5%
3rd down-0.082-0.90111.2%
Standard downs-0.167-13.54824.3%
Passing downs0.0130.24113.0%
Logan Inagawa · QBUsage 19.9% · Avg PPA 0.201 · Total 12.068
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.20112.06819.9%
Pass0.2509.76928.1%
Rush0.2084.16813.2%
1st down0.1733.80817.1%
2nd down0.2083.74918.2%
3rd down-0.166-2.82126.2%
Standard downs0.2459.56119.0%
Passing downs0.1192.50721.9%
Curtis Kimmons IV · RBUsage 13.8% · Avg PPA 0.213 · Total 14.031
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21314.03113.8%
Pass0.2272.4935.1%
Rush0.21011.53822.0%
1st down0.1233.68614.4%
2nd down0.2907.23915.5%
3rd down0.2823.10611.2%
Standard downs0.24312.38515.3%
Passing downs0.1101.64610.3%
Ty Harding · WRUsage 11.5% · Avg PPA 0.701 · Total 27.349
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.70127.34911.5%
Pass0.56219.67024.0%
Rush1.9207.6802.1%
1st down0.5288.98211.3%
2nd down1.03113.40411.5%
3rd down0.5524.96413.2%
Standard downs0.66916.06410.0%
Passing downs0.75211.28515.3%
Jordan Washington · RBUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA 0.176 · Total 1.935
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1761.9359.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1761.93515.9%
1st down0.3471.7339.8%
2nd down-0.268-1.07010.0%
3rd down0.6361.2738.7%
Standard downs0.2282.27912.7%
Passing downs-0.344-0.3442.8%
Joseph Griffin Jr. · WRUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.258 · Total 6.189
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2586.1898.4%
Pass0.2586.18917.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.344-3.0997.1%
2nd down1.17910.6129.3%
3rd down-0.221-1.32410.7%
Standard downs0.3976.7508.5%
Passing downs-0.080-0.5618.0%
Jabari Lewis · WRUsage 7.7% · Avg PPA 0.565 · Total 18.089
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56518.0897.7%
Pass0.56518.08916.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.74810.4727.8%
2nd down0.0340.3106.5%
3rd down1.1367.9528.0%
Standard downs0.3215.7796.3%
Passing downs0.87912.31010.9%
TK Davis · RBUsage 7.5% · Avg PPA -0.008 · Total -0.023
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.008-0.0237.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.008-0.02311.5%
1st down0.0950.0955.3%
2nd down0.3140.3149.1%
3rd down-0.432-0.43211.1%
Standard downs-0.169-0.3376.7%
Passing downs0.3140.31410.0%
Justin Lewis · RBUsage 7.4% · Avg PPA -0.048 · Total -0.193
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.048-0.1937.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.048-0.19311.1%
1st down0.8021.6048.0%
2nd down-0.628-0.6285.6%
3rd down-1.169-1.1699.1%
Standard downs-0.048-0.19310.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Max Dowling · TEUsage 5.7% · Avg PPA 0.316 · Total 7.888
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3167.8885.7%
Pass0.3167.88812.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1811.4454.2%
2nd down0.4084.0776.7%
3rd down0.3382.3667.9%
Standard downs0.3573.5733.3%
Passing downs0.2884.31511.0%
Reece Adkins · TEUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA 0.460 · Total 11.505
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.46011.5055.2%
Pass0.3487.3129.7%
Rush1.0484.1931.6%
1st down-0.070-0.6964.8%
2nd down-0.084-0.4203.1%
3rd down0.7024.9167.1%
Standard downs0.4738.0425.1%
Passing downs0.4333.4635.5%
Kezion Dia-Johnson · WRUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA 0.463 · Total 10.642
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.46310.6424.8%
Pass0.5108.1627.4%
Rush0.3542.4812.8%
1st down0.6754.7233.3%
2nd down0.6285.6545.6%
3rd down0.0720.3585.1%
Standard downs0.86111.1933.9%
Passing downs-0.055-0.5516.8%
Justin Williams-Thomas · RBUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.224 · Total 2.462
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2242.4624.7%
Pass0.2630.5251.8%
Rush0.2151.9367.9%
1st down0.1701.0195.9%
2nd down0.1600.6385.3%
3rd down0.8050.8052.0%
Standard downs0.2412.4086.2%
Passing downs0.0530.0531.4%
Dallas Elliott · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.715 · Total 5.006
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7155.0063.2%
Pass0.7155.0067.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3871.5494.0%
2nd down2.0032.0031.4%
3rd down0.7261.4534.8%
Standard downs0.4662.3303.2%
Passing downs1.3382.6763.3%
Jax Markovich · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA -0.250 · Total -1.000
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.250-1.0003.0%
Pass-0.250-1.0005.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.559-1.6785.3%
2nd down0.6780.6782.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.559-1.6783.4%
Passing downs0.6780.6782.3%
Owen Anderson · TEUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA -0.808 · Total -0.808
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.808-0.8082.5%
Pass-0.808-0.8087.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.808-0.80811.1%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.808-0.80810.0%
Drew Alsup · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 1.052 · Total 3.156
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0523.1562.2%
Pass1.0523.1563.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0101.0101.9%
2nd down2.1232.1232.2%
3rd down0.0230.0233.4%
Standard downs1.5673.1332.3%
Passing downs0.0230.0232.0%
Matthew Ogunniyi · TEUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.302 · Total -1.208
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.302-1.2081.9%
Pass-0.302-1.2083.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.932-1.8642.4%
2nd down0.3280.6572.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.932-1.8641.5%
Passing downs0.3280.6572.9%
Tavian Dashiell · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.361 · Total -1.084
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.361-1.0841.7%
Pass0.0130.0131.5%
Rush-0.548-1.0971.9%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.361-1.0845.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.548-1.0971.6%
Passing downs0.0130.0132.0%
Kai Owens · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.908 · Total -0.908
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.908-0.9081.5%
Pass-0.908-0.9082.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.908-0.9083.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.908-0.9082.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Massachusetts sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.125 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.413 (37th percentile; 138 teams)37thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.187 (30th percentile; 138 teams)30thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.243 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.096 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.013 (74th percentile; 138 teams)74thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.392 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.124 (87th percentile; 138 teams)87thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.153 (43rd percentile; 138 teams)43rd
Values and percentiles
Massachusetts metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.12545th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.41337th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.18730th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.24358th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.09647th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.01374th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.39264th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.12487th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15343rd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 208 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.1 yards (83rd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.2 per completion. Completion 65.9%, 7.2 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.30.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense65.7%60.3%+5.4169 / 208
Defense allowed55.1%59.4%-4.2185 / 241

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Massachusetts.

Target mix by zone, Massachusetts offense
Short left31% · 64Short middle22% · 46Short right30% · 61Deep left6% · 13Deep middle5% · 10Deep right5% · 11

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Massachusetts passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense208100%10.14.265.9%0.30+5.4 pp169
Passing defense241100%8.34.856.0%0.13-4.2 pp185

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2644.643.2%0.123.201.101.0014.4%61.5%
Defense allowed2923.940.6%0.043.100.900.8015.5%68.6%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense256 / 2642541012120250 / 250 · 100.0%
Defense allowed287 / 2922791318330271 / 271 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +5.4 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-6.010.827.6W1W1 vs Rutgers: +27.6 ppW2W3W4W4 vs Sacramento State: +9.8 ppW5W5 vs Eastern Michigan: +8.7 ppW6W6 vs Miami (OH): +7.5 ppW7W7 vs Buffalo: -6.0 ppW8W8 vs UConn: -4.6 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Rutgers222286.4%58.7%+27.6 pp11.30.72414.90.25
W2Sacred Heart140———9.10.56265.80.38
W3Stonehill250———8.60.13355.70.29
W4Sacramento State161668.8%58.9%+9.8 pp9.80.39376.40.27
W5Eastern Michigan272774.1%65.4%+8.7 pp7.00.27254.2-0.17
W6Miami (OH)353560.0%52.5%+7.5 pp17.30.45302.0-0.28
W7Buffalo252556.0%62.0%-6.0 pp8.6-0.02483.90.09
W8UConn444459.1%63.7%-4.6 pp7.80.15222.5-0.07

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

35 punts · 43.8 gross yards/punt · 38.6 net yards/punt

8 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 3 blocked

Known gross yards: 34/35 punts. Known net yards: 25/35 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 22.0 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

1 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · UConn843.641.05/8
Week 7 · Buffalo533.436.25/5
Week 6 · Miami (OH)646.341.25/6
Week 5 · Eastern Michigan250.040.02/2
Week 4 · Sacramento State536.227.73/5
Team style
Rating history