Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Marshall

2026 season

Sun Belt
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Marshall's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 118 across 8 systems; best 99, worst 130, so they disagree by 31 places.

Lab EPA
#118
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#126
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#111
up 102026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#99
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#123
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#104
up 8 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#130
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#118
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#91 of 138
Schedule strength
#94 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#121 of 138
Game control
#122 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#130 of 138
Offense
#119 of 138
Defense
#126 of 138
Special teams
#76 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Marshall · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.112 net EPA/play

#118

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-10.24 points

#126 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -7.53 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -5.58, schedule #100 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -2.38. That is worth -13.11 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.58 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -10.24.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Marshall · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Penn State
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858434
-45.00 → -35.00+2.500.76379.48%+7.11-3.0810.674-2.407
Week 2 · Middle Tennessee
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401871045
+2.00 → +2.00-2.500.79379.85%-8.22-0.049-0.809-0.859
Week 3 · Missouri State
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401871047
+6.00 → +6.00+2.500.824910.24%-11.700.870-1.198-0.327
Week 4 · Gardner-Webb
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401868188
+1.00 → +1.00-2.500.857210.64%-25.00 (fixed lower division)-0.160-2.660-2.820
Week 5 · James Madison
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401869962
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.890911.06%+9.51-2.8201.051-1.769
Week 6 · Coastal Carolina
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401869943
-6.00 → -6.00-2.500.925911.49%-6.06-0.977-0.696-1.673
Week 8 · South Alabama
home · 2026-10-20 · ID 401871092
+7.00 → +7.00-2.501.000012.41%-4.490.559-0.5570.002

Game terms -9.85 points; prior term -0.39 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -10.24 points. The preseason prior is -1.58 with 24.83% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-10.7 SP+ points

#111 · Up 10 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-9.34 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#104 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -1.31 on 384 plays; defense 8.03 on 373 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Marshall 8 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 1-2 · home 3-1 · away 1-2 · expected wins 2.7
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-5 ATS (-9.6 avg) · 2025: 7-5 ATS (+1.3 avg)
Head coach
Tony Gibson · hired 2024-12-08 · 5-7 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #103 (146 pts) · 2025 #120 (118 pts) · 2026 #123 (162 pts)
Returning
99% of production · 75% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing100%94%
Receiving91%89%
Rushing210%55%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back93.000.84437.60
Defensive Line73.000.82985.81
Linebacker73.000.84275.90
Offensive Line112.910.82519.08
Quarterback23.000.83551.67
Receiver63.000.84255.06
Running Back23.000.84191.68
Special Teams73.000.82885.80

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Zion Turner · QB

CFBD athlete 4685697. UConn (2021–2023); Jacksonville State (2024–2024); Marshall (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.1908828.8%
Pass 48.9% · Rush 8.2%

1st 27.8% · 2nd 29.2% · 3rd 29.6%

Standard downs 24.5% · Passing downs 38.7%

2022: 3★ · 0.8781
Joshon Barbie · RB

CFBD athlete 5084210. Marshall (2025–2026); McNeese (2022–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.1184113.5%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 23.0%

1st 19.0% · 2nd 11.4% · 3rd 6.0%

Standard downs 17.7% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Judah Price · RB

CFBD athlete 5161776. Marshall (2025–2026); West Virginia (2023–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.2084012.4%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 20.8%

1st 15.6% · 2nd 12.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 16.2% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Jorge Diaz Nicolas · PK

CFBD athlete 5294118. Virginia (2025–2025); Marshall (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-1.32013—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: stars unavailable
Adrian Norton · WR

CFBD athlete 5157331. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.1%
Pass 16.4% · Rush 0.5%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 10.3% · 3rd 9.4%

Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 11.1%

Not linked
Anthony Quinn Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5222975. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Carlos Del Rio-Wilson · QB

CFBD athlete 4432691. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.3%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.4%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Chris Culliver · WR

CFBD athlete 4899472. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 9.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 6.6% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
Christian Hamilton · WR

CFBD athlete 4870739. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 12.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 12.9%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
De'Andre Tamarez · WR

CFBD athlete 5089545. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 9.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Josiah McLaurin · WR

CFBD athlete 5147685. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked
Khalil Wilkins · QB

CFBD athlete 5158251. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.9%
Pass 9.4% · Rush 13.2%

1st 12.7% · 2nd 7.6% · 3rd 11.3%

Standard downs 11.1% · Passing downs 10.3%

Not linked
Owen Sweeney · WR

CFBD athlete 5225343. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 10.7% · Rush 0.4%

1st 2.3% · 2nd 9.4% · 3rd 6.2%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Shawn Rouse · TE

CFBD athlete 5092695. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.2%
Pass 2.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
TJ Lester · RB

CFBD athlete 5300926. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 11.5%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 5.8% · 3rd 4.1%

Standard downs 7.6% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Toby Payne · TE

CFBD athlete 4869602. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.2%
Pass 16.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 10.5% · 3rd 8.2%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 12.9%

Not linked
Xayvion Turner-Bradshaw · WR

CFBD athlete 5081172. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 14.8% · Rush 1.7%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 6.4% · 3rd 12.4%

Standard downs 8.8% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 28 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Andrew Hamad · LBNot reported2026-07-29— / —Immediate
Aumad Edwards · CBKentucky2026-01-173★ / 0.8000Immediate
BJ Carter · DLIowa State2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Brayden Hall · CBCentral Connecticut2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Charles McCartherens · CBBuffalo2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Chase Ortiz · LSStetson2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Chris Culliver · WRNorth Carolina2026-01-073★ / 0.8400Immediate
Christian Hamilton · WRWest Virginia2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cole Funderburk · EDGEWake Forest2026-01-063★ / 0.8400Immediate
Eddie Pleasant III · CBBuffalo2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Jamarion Wilcox · RBKentucky2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaquez Joiner · IOLUCF2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jorge Diaz Nicolas · KVirginia2026-01-21— / —Immediate
Josiah McLaurin · RBMaryland2026-04-073★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kelvon McBride · LBNC State2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Kendell Anderson · SMorgan State2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Kenyatta Hardge · DLKentucky2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Keydel Painter · EDGEVirginia Union2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Khalil Wilkins · QBWest Virginia2026-01-183★ / 0.8300Immediate
Logan Greer · IOLCalifornia (PA)2025-12-233★ / 0.8300Immediate
Mike Williams Jr. · DLUTSA2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Owen Sweeney · WRVMI2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Robby Martin · IOLWest Virginia2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Simeon John · DLUVA Wise2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
TJ Lester · RBWest Georgia2026-01-083★ / 0.8300Immediate
Terrente Hinton · SNC State2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Terry Nwabuisi-Ezeala · DLVanderbilt2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Xavier Bausley · OTWest Virginia2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Outgoing · 22 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aden Willis · CBNot reported2026-01-20— / —Immediate
Ali Abbasi · DLNot reported2025-12-24— / —Immediate
Antwan Roberts Jr. · RBArizona2026-01-143★ / 0.8700Immediate
Brock Walters · LSKennesaw State2026-01-223★ / 0.8300Immediate
Christian Richter · OTUConn2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Darrell Sweeting · CBUAB2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Gavin Magorien · LSNot reported2026-01-14— / —Immediate
Henry Harden · IOLNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
JacQai Long · QBKentucky2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jamaal Whyce Jr. · DLBaylor2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaydyn Johnson · LBNot reported2025-12-28— / —Immediate
Jibreel Al-Amin · LBKansas2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Justin Williams-Thomas · RBMassachusetts2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
K.J. Jones · WRNot reported2025-12-18— / —Immediate
KaTron Evans · DLNC State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lorcan Quinn · KAlabama2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Michael Allen · RBEast Carolina2026-01-084★ / —Immediate
Naquan Crowder · DLMinnesota2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nathan Totten · PVirginia Tech2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Paul Hutson III · EDGEWashington State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Sid Kaba · DLMinnesota2026-01-123★ / 0.8900Immediate
Tayvon Nelson · CBNot reported2026-01-013★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Marshall. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Tony Gibson · career 5–7 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 11 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Tony Gibson · active at capture

    5–7 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2024 · Charles Huff

    32–20 · 52 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2021-01-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2010–2020 · Doc Holliday

    85–54 · 139 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Hired 2009-12-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2005–2009 · Mark Snyder

    23–37 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2005-04-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1997–2004 · Bob Pruett

    79–23 · 102 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1979–1981 · Sonny Randle

    5–27–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1975–1978 · Frank Ellwood

    9–35 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1971–1974 · Jack Lengyel

    9–33 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1969–1970 · Rick Tolley

    6–13 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1968–1968 · Perry Moss

    0–9–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1962–1967 · Charlie Snyder

    23–36–1 · 60 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Tony Gibson · incomplete attribution0–0——-13.2-16.3123—
2025 · Tony Gibson5–73–50–0-4.5-5.8120—
2024 · Charles Huff10–38–10–03.13.5103—
2023 · Charles Huff6–73–50–1-9-7.5125—
2022 · Charles Huff9–45–31–030.657—
2021 · Charles Huff7–65–30–183.7125—
2020 · Doc Holliday7–34–20–19.53.996—
2019 · Doc Holliday8–56–20–1-1.9-4.771—
2018 · Doc Holliday9–46–21–01-1.674—
2017 · Doc Holliday8–54–41–0-4.5-2.787—
2016 · Doc Holliday3–92–60–0-12.7-2051—
2015 · Doc Holliday10–36–21–03.5-0.275—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:24 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play82 / 13840.9130 / 1385.8
Success rate50 / 13864.2113 / 13818.2
Explosiveness100 / 13827.7116 / 13816.1
Standard-down success43 / 13869.3117 / 13815.3
Passing-down success67 / 13851.884 / 13839.4
Pass PPA75 / 13846.0134 / 1382.9
Rush PPA102 / 13826.3113 / 13818.2
Pass explosiveness76 / 13845.3130 / 1385.8
Rush explosiveness107 / 13822.672 / 13848.2
Line yards49 / 13865.0107 / 13822.6
Second-level yards32 / 13877.485 / 13838.7
Open-field yards71 / 13848.9130 / 1385.8
Stuff rateT94 / 13831.893 / 13832.8
Power success105 / 13824.171 / 13848.9
HavocT107 / 13821.9T106 / 13823.0
Front-seven havocT113 / 13817.2T99 / 13827.4
DB havocT90 / 13834.3T81 / 13840.9
Points / opportunityT132 / 1384.091 / 13834.3
Average field positionT93 / 13832.1T96 / 13829.6
Field-position expected pointsT102 / 13825.9103 / 13825.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Zion Turner · QBUsage 28.8% · Avg PPA 0.171 · Total 17.144
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.17117.14428.8%
Pass0.17214.80148.9%
Rush0.4906.3658.2%
1st down-0.015-0.62627.8%
2nd down0.39513.81829.2%
3rd down0.1563.28529.6%
Standard downs-0.025-1.45324.5%
Passing downs0.45418.59738.7%
Joshon Barbie · RBUsage 13.5% · Avg PPA 0.102 · Total 5.914
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1025.91413.5%
Pass0.2963.2535.3%
Rush0.0572.66123.0%
1st down-0.007-0.23919.0%
2nd down0.0911.54011.4%
3rd down0.9234.6136.0%
Standard downs0.0603.10917.7%
Passing downs0.4682.8054.4%
Judah Price · RBUsage 12.4% · Avg PPA 0.263 · Total 14.197
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.26314.19712.4%
Pass0.4595.9715.9%
Rush0.2018.22620.8%
1st down0.0310.94515.6%
2nd down0.0250.45212.0%
3rd down2.13312.8017.1%
Standard downs0.1125.39616.2%
Passing downs1.4678.8014.3%
Khalil Wilkins · QBUsage 10.9% · Avg PPA 0.331 · Total 17.867
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.33117.86710.9%
Pass0.2275.2279.4%
Rush0.40812.64013.2%
1st down0.0521.46112.7%
2nd down0.5216.7737.6%
3rd down0.8469.31111.3%
Standard downs0.0742.81311.1%
Passing downs0.94115.05510.3%
Toby Payne · TEUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA 0.154 · Total 6.294
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1546.2948.2%
Pass0.1546.29416.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.242-3.1405.9%
2nd down0.56910.25010.5%
3rd down0.7986.3848.2%
Standard downs0.0531.1166.1%
Passing downs0.2595.17812.9%
Adrian Norton · WRUsage 8.1% · Avg PPA 0.198 · Total 6.735
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1986.7358.1%
Pass0.2147.05916.4%
Rush-0.324-0.3240.5%
1st down0.3983.9755.4%
2nd down0.0260.39010.3%
3rd down0.8186.5439.4%
Standard downs0.0490.9776.8%
Passing downs0.4115.75811.1%
Xayvion Turner-Bradshaw · WRUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 0.675 · Total 26.992
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.67526.9928.0%
Pass0.67824.40914.8%
Rush0.6462.5831.7%
1st down-0.131-2.2347.7%
2nd down1.15812.7366.4%
3rd down1.37416.49012.4%
Standard downs0.59617.8768.8%
Passing downs0.9129.1166.5%
Christian Hamilton · WRUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA -0.076 · Total -0.841
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.076-0.8416.8%
Pass-0.076-0.84112.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.675-3.3777.4%
2nd down-0.036-0.0733.4%
3rd down0.6522.60912.9%
Standard downs-0.752-4.5125.4%
Passing downs0.7343.67110.0%
TJ Lester · RBUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.449 · Total 14.818
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.44914.8186.6%
Pass1.3418.0492.5%
Rush0.2516.76911.5%
1st down-0.132-2.2507.7%
2nd down0.7317.3075.8%
3rd down0.5392.1574.1%
Standard downs0.44211.4857.6%
Passing downs0.4763.3334.5%
Owen Sweeney · WRUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.487 · Total 13.139
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48713.1395.4%
Pass0.53113.81410.7%
Rush-0.674-0.6740.4%
1st down0.3861.9302.3%
2nd down0.5268.4219.4%
3rd down0.4652.7886.2%
Standard downs0.0620.7473.5%
Passing downs0.82612.3929.7%
De'Andre Tamarez · WRUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA 0.666 · Total 10.664
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.66610.6645.2%
Pass0.66610.6649.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0915.4563.6%
2nd down0.4492.2474.7%
3rd down0.4942.96110.5%
Standard downs0.8046.4333.8%
Passing downs0.5294.2308.2%
Chris Culliver · WRUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA -0.227 · Total -3.628
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.227-3.6284.6%
Pass-0.227-3.6289.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.257-1.5443.9%
2nd down-0.213-1.7056.6%
3rd down-0.190-0.3792.9%
Standard downs-0.257-1.5442.5%
Passing downs-0.208-2.0858.9%
Josiah McLaurin · WRUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.210 · Total 1.682
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2101.6823.5%
Pass0.2101.6826.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.005-0.0214.0%
2nd down0.6411.9223.8%
3rd down-0.219-0.2192.2%
Standard downs0.2721.9014.4%
Passing downs-0.219-0.2191.4%
Carlos Del Rio-Wilson · QBUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.263 · Total -0.790
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.263-0.7902.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.263-0.7904.3%
1st down-1.386-1.3861.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.2980.5967.4%
Standard downs-0.263-0.7903.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Anthony Quinn Jr. · RBUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA -0.420 · Total -0.420
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.420-0.4201.8%
Pass-0.420-0.4203.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.420-0.4204.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.420-0.4202.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Shawn Rouse · TEUsage 1.2% · Avg PPA -0.167 · Total -0.167
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.167-0.1671.2%
Pass-0.167-0.1672.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.167-0.1675.9%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.167-0.1673.8%
Where Marshall sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.112 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.449 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.181 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.213 (46th percentile; 138 teams)46thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.041 (26th percentile; 138 teams)26thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.248 (6th percentile; 138 teams)6thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.439 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.315 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.139 (23rd percentile; 138 teams)23rd
Values and percentiles
Marshall metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.11241st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.44964th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.18128th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.21346th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.04126th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.2486th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.43918th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.31516th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13923rd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 238 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.7 yards (54th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.5 per completion. Completion 62.6%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.25.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.6%61.4%+0.2198 / 238
Defense allowed56.5%59.1%-2.5184 / 220

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Marshall.

Target mix by zone, Marshall offense
Short left32% · 73Short middle18% · 42Short right38% · 88Deep left5% · 11Deep middle3% · 6Deep right4% · 10

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Marshall passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense238100%8.75.562.6%0.25+0.2 pp198
Passing defense22099%9.95.758.6%0.38-2.5 pp184

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2474.450.2%0.143.301.201.0015.4%67.6%
Defense allowed2525.345.1%0.173.001.001.8016.4%71.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense240 / 2471697812880226 / 227 · 99.6%
Defense allowed247 / 252236166220244 / 244 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +0.2 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-2.82.78.1W1W1 vs Penn State: -2.5 ppW2W2 vs Middle Tennessee: +5.5 ppW3W3 vs Missouri State: +8.1 ppW4W5W5 vs James Madison: -1.7 ppW6W6 vs Coastal Carolina: -1.1 ppW8W8 vs South Alabama: -2.8 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Penn State282867.9%70.4%-2.5 pp4.6-0.11271.3-0.73
W2Middle Tennessee232365.2%59.7%+5.5 pp10.20.40374.10.21
W3Missouri State262665.4%57.3%+8.1 pp10.00.49455.50.34
W4Gardner-Webb400———9.70.60354.40.18
W5James Madison515156.9%58.6%-1.7 pp9.60.28304.40.20
W6Coastal Carolina373756.8%57.9%-1.1 pp10.2-0.01405.90.25
W8South Alabama333363.6%66.4%-2.8 pp5.50.13334.10.26

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

29 punts · 46.0 gross yards/punt · 39.9 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 29/29 punts. Known net yards: 23/29 punts.

Our punt returns

6 returns · 7.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 6/6 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · South Alabama450.548.73/4
Week 6 · Coastal Carolina247.537.01/2
Week 5 · James Madison546.037.05/5
Week 4 · Gardner-Webb342.342.52/3
Week 3 · Missouri State146.046.01/1
Team style
Rating history