Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Louisville

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Louisville's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 22.5 across 8 systems; best 21, worst 30, so they disagree by 9 places.

Lab EPA
#21
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#21
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#26
down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#29
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#21
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#30
up 1 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#24
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#21
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#41 of 138
Schedule strength
#33 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#60 of 138
Game control
#45 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#20 of 138
Offense
#7 of 138
Defense
#51 of 138
Special teams
#44 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Louisville · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.121 net EPA/play

#21

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

9.17 points

#21 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +9.06 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +1.76, schedule #26 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +5.83. That is worth +10.82 on its own; the preseason prior of +4.20 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +9.17.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Louisville · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Ole Miss
neutral · 2026-09-06 · ID 401856661
-3.00 → -3.000.000.76379.52%+14.02-0.2861.3351.049
Week 2 · Villanova
home · 2026-09-11 · ID 401858215
+46.00 → +35.00-2.500.79379.90%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.217-2.4750.742
Week 3 · SMU
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858230
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.824910.29%+7.810.7720.8041.575
Week 4 · Wake Forest
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858243
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.857210.69%+12.07-0.5881.2900.702
Week 5 · NC State
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858248
-3.00 → -3.00+2.500.890911.11%-2.52-0.056-0.280-0.336
Week 6 · Florida State
home · 2026-10-09 · ID 401858254
+24.00 → +24.00-2.500.925911.55%+6.692.4830.7733.255
Week 7 · Syracuse
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858265
+8.00 → +8.00+2.500.962212.00%-1.041.260-0.1251.135

Game terms +8.12 points; prior term +1.05 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +9.17 points. The preseason prior is +4.20 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

12.2 SP+ points

#26 · Down 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

10.28 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#30 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 10.05 on 368 plays; defense -0.23 on 455 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA and local SRS assign the same rank at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 3-2 · home 3-1 · away 1-1 · expected wins 4.5
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-3 ATS (+1.6 avg) · 2025: 4-9 ATS (-1.9 avg)
Head coach
Jeff Brohm · hired 2022-12-07 · 28-12 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #58 (187 pts) · 2025 #68 (183 pts) · 2026 #48 (212 pts)
Returning
35% of production · 27% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing0%0%
Receiving18%24%
Rushing85%61%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back73.290.88486.19
Defensive Line133.150.879811.44
Linebacker63.170.87175.23
Offensive Line153.070.867813.02
Quarterback43.500.89183.57
Receiver133.150.874211.36
Running Back43.250.88213.53
Special Teams83.000.86036.88

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Lincoln Kienholz · QB

CFBD athlete 5078278. Louisville (2026–2026); Ohio State (2023–2025)

Passing WEPA0.48117756.1%
Pass 96.5% · Rush 23.8%

1st 46.5% · 2nd 58.1% · 3rd 77.8%

Standard downs 49.5% · Passing downs 72.1%

2023: 4★ · 0.9264
Isaac Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 5079349. Louisville (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2707221.1%
Pass 6.6% · Rush 33.3%

1st 27.2% · 2nd 17.6% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 24.0% · Passing downs 14.0%

2024: 3★ · 0.8869
Lincoln Kienholz · QB

CFBD athlete 5078278. Louisville (2026–2026); Ohio State (2023–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.3726056.1%
Pass 96.5% · Rush 23.8%

1st 46.5% · 2nd 58.1% · 3rd 77.8%

Standard downs 49.5% · Passing downs 72.1%

2023: 4★ · 0.9264
Keyjuan Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 4923046. Louisville (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3345413.8%
Pass 1.6% · Rush 25.3%

1st 19.2% · 2nd 12.5% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 17.8% · Passing downs 3.6%

2023: 3★ · 0.8786
Carson Hilbert · PK

CFBD athlete 5296134. Louisville (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR3.9409—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: 2★ · 0.7900
Nick Keller · PK

CFBD athlete 5081159. Louisville (2022–2026)

Kicker PAAR-0.8201—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Braxton Jennings · RB

CFBD athlete 5296136. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 1.2% · Rush 6.2%

1st 1.0% · 2nd 5.8% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Briggs Cherry · QB

CFBD athlete 5158996. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Brody Foley · TE

CFBD athlete 4819226. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Davin Wydner · QB

CFBD athlete 4836476. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 14.3% · Rush 2.7%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 7.8% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Elizjah Lewis · WR

CFBD athlete 4893702. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Jackson Voth · WR

CFBD athlete 5144023. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Jaleel Skinner · TE

CFBD athlete 4685560. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 12.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 8.6%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 8.5%

Not linked
Julius Miles · TE

CFBD athlete 5276641. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Justyn Reid · TE

CFBD athlete 5077877. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.3% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Lawayne McCoy · WR

CFBD athlete 5086096. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 21.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 13.5% · 3rd 7.4%

Standard downs 7.9% · Passing downs 14.0%

Not linked
Lekhy Thompkins · RB

CFBD athlete 5209960. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 10.1%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 7.5% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Marlon Harbin · WR

CFBD athlete 5210046. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Marquise Davis · RB

CFBD athlete 5141420. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 15.0%

1st 12.2% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 11.0% · Passing downs 1.8%

Not linked
T.J. McWilliams · WR

CFBD athlete 5078049. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Tre Richardson · WR

CFBD athlete 5294063. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.3%
Pass 20.2% · Rush 2.5%

1st 11.7% · 2nd 8.1% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 9.8% · Passing downs 11.6%

Not linked
Treyshun Hurry · WR

CFBD athlete 5085609. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.5%
Pass 19.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.0% · 2nd 8.8% · 3rd 9.9%

Standard downs 7.6% · Passing downs 10.9%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 33 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anwar O'neal · OTDelaware2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ben Perry · LBUCLA2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brody Foley · TETulsa2026-01-074★ / 0.9200Immediate
Brycen Scott · CBElon2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cason Henry · OTSouth Carolina2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
DJ Waller Jr. · CBKentucky2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Davin Wydner · QBWest Georgia2026-01-113★ / 0.8200Immediate
Daylen Russell · DLMiami2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Demeco Kennedy · DLPurdue2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Elizjah Lewis · WRPace2026-01-283★ / 0.8500Immediate
Eryx Daugherty · IOLBoston College2026-01-063★ / 0.8800Immediate
Evan Wibberley · IOLKentucky2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Garth White · KRhode Island2026-05-09— / —Immediate
Jackson Voth · WRDrake2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jacob Baker · PEastern Kentucky2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Jacob Smith · EDGEKentucky2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jakob Dixon · WREastern Kentucky2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jerod Smith II · DLKentucky2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Johnnie Brown III · IOLGeorgia Southern2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Joshua Donald · DLHouston2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justyn Reid · TETulane2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kaleb Beasley · STennessee2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Koen Entringer · SIowa2026-01-103★ / 0.8900Immediate
Lawayne McCoy · WRFlorida State2026-01-114★ / 0.9200Immediate
Lincoln Kienholz · QBOhio State2026-01-043★ / 0.8900Immediate
Marquise Davis · RBMissouri2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Montavin Quisenberry · WRKentucky2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ryan Manis · LSLiberty2026-01-103★ / 0.8300Immediate
Santana Wilson · CBTexas2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
TJ Banks · SOle Miss2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tommy Ziesmer · DLEastern Kentucky2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tre Richardson · WRVanderbilt2026-01-094★ / 0.9300Immediate
Tyler Thompson · EDGENorth Carolina2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 40 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
AJ Green · EDGENot reported2026-01-064★ / 0.9100Withdrawn
Antonio Meeks · WRWake Forest2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Antonio Watts · LBNot reported2026-01-033★ / —Withdrawn
Blake Ruffin · SNot reported2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Bobby Golden · WRNot reported2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Brady Allen · QBIndiana State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brock Coffman · WRKentucky2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
CJ May · EDGEMissouri2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Carter Guillaume · IOLOregon State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carter Schwartz · PArizona2026-02-05— / —Immediate
Chris Jones Jr. · DLNot reported2026-01-07— / —Withdrawn
Cooper Ranvier · KTennessee2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Corey Gordon Jr. · SKansas2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
D'Angelo Hutchinson · SCincinnati2026-08-253★ / —Immediate
Daeh McCullough · SWestern Michigan2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Davon Mitchell · TENot reported2026-01-014★ / —Immediate
Deuce Adams · QBWisconsin2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Duke Watson · RBUCF2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Eli Adams · WRWisconsin2026-01-233★ / 0.8300Immediate
Fred Johnson · IOLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Grant Houser · TEColorado State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Isaac Brown · RBNot reported2026-01-014★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jamarice Wilder · RBSouthern Miss2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
James Glover-Tyson · OTNot reported2025-12-28— / —Immediate
Jerry Lawson · DLOklahoma State2026-01-053★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jordan Church · IOLTexas Tech2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Justin Agu · CBTulane2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Justin Beadles · EDGECalifornia2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kendrick Gilbert · DLBall State2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kris Hughes · WRNot reported2025-12-29— / —Immediate
Mason Mims · QBEast Tennessee State2026-01-193★ / —Immediate
Maurice Davis · EDGENot reported2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Micah Carter · EDGENot reported2025-12-273★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nate Kurisky · TEDuke2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Rae'mon Mosby · CBEast Carolina2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Ransom McDermott · OTTemple2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Selah Brown · DLBowling Green2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Shaun Boykins Jr. · RBDelaware State2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
TreyShun Hurry · WRNot reported2026-01-01— / —Immediate
Xavier Porter · DLEast Tennessee State2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Louisville. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Jeff Brohm · career 94–56 across 13 seasons and 3 schools

Tenure timeline · 16 appointments
  1. 2023–present · Jeff Brohm · active at capture

    28–12 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2022–2022 · Deion Branch · interim

    1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2022-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2019–2022 · Scott Satterfield

    25–24 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2018-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2018–2018 · Lorenzo Ward · interim

    0–2 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2018-11-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2014–2018 · Bobby Petrino

    36–26 · 62 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2014-01-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2010–2013 · Charlie Strong

    37–15 · 52 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2009-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2007–2009 · Steve Kragthorpe

    15–21 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2007-01-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2003–2006 · Bobby Petrino

    41–9 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2002-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1998–2002 · John Smith

    41–21 · 62 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1995–1997 · Ron Cooper

    13–20 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1985–1994 · Howard Schnellenberger

    54–56–2 · 112 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1980–1984 · Bob Weber

    20–35 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1975–1979 · Vince Gibson

    23–31–2 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1973–1974 · Tom Alley

    9–13 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1969–1972 · Lee Corso

    28–11–3 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1962–1968 · Frank Camp

    32–38 · 70 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Jeff Brohm · incomplete attribution0–0——12.911.948—
2025 · Jeff Brohm9–44–41–012.49.368—
2024 · Jeff Brohm9–45–31–013.615.458—
2023 · Jeff Brohm10–47–20–1812.63119
2022 · Scott Satterfield · incomplete attribution7–5——910.651—
2022 · Deion Branch · incomplete attribution1–0——910.651—
2021 · Scott Satterfield6–74–40–17.88.138—
2020 · Scott Satterfield4–73–70–06.5—42—
2019 · Scott Satterfield8–55–31–00.20.169—
2018 · Bobby Petrino · incomplete attribution2–8——-9.1-15.430—
2018 · Lorenzo Ward · incomplete attribution0–2——-9.1-15.430—
2017 · Bobby Petrino8–54–40–119.213.334—
2016 · Bobby Petrino9–47–10–122.917.33821
2015 · Bobby Petrino8–55–31–013.28.333—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-23 16:45:06 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play8 / 13894.980 / 13842.3
Success rate20 / 13886.172 / 13848.2
Explosiveness2 / 13899.370 / 13849.6
Standard-down success14 / 13890.548 / 13865.7
Passing-down successT39 / 13871.9T111 / 13819.3
Pass PPA12 / 13892.0104 / 13824.8
Rush PPA16 / 13889.142 / 13870.1
Pass explosiveness56 / 13859.9132 / 1384.4
Rush explosiveness3 / 13898.57 / 13895.6
Line yards126 / 1388.885 / 13838.7
Second-level yards36 / 13874.547 / 13866.4
Open-field yards1 / 138100.024 / 13883.2
Stuff rate132 / 1384.4136 / 1381.5
Power successT107 / 13821.217 / 13888.3
HavocT117 / 13814.2T79 / 13842.7
Front-seven havocT131 / 1384.7T105 / 13823.0
DB havocT41 / 13870.4T33 / 13875.9
Points / opportunity28 / 13880.355 / 13860.6
Average field positionT62 / 13855.1T76 / 13844.9
Field-position expected points59 / 13857.769 / 13850.4

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Lincoln Kienholz · QBUsage 56.1% · Avg PPA 0.416 · Total 103.902
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.416103.90256.1%
Pass0.44384.66496.5%
Rush0.39622.57023.8%
1st down0.33032.63646.5%
2nd down0.42436.44658.1%
3rd down0.68242.93877.8%
Standard downs0.33853.03249.5%
Passing downs0.54750.87072.1%
Isaac Brown · RBUsage 21.1% · Avg PPA 0.094 · Total 8.813
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0948.81321.1%
Pass0.2042.6516.6%
Rush0.0836.67733.3%
1st down-0.054-3.14027.2%
2nd down0.40710.59317.6%
3rd down0.7176.45211.1%
Standard downs0.0413.15424.0%
Passing downs0.3145.66014.0%
Keyjuan Brown · RBUsage 13.8% · Avg PPA 0.339 · Total 17.980
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.33917.98013.8%
Pass0.2090.6271.6%
Rush0.34717.35325.3%
1st down0.2578.99519.2%
2nd down0.2403.83812.5%
3rd down2.5735.1472.8%
Standard downs0.31715.53017.8%
Passing downs0.6132.4503.6%
Tre Richardson · WRUsage 10.3% · Avg PPA 0.827 · Total 38.031
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.82738.03110.3%
Pass0.81732.68520.2%
Rush0.8915.3452.5%
1st down0.91422.86111.7%
2nd down0.5066.0748.1%
3rd down1.0119.09611.1%
Standard downs0.89127.6229.8%
Passing downs0.69410.40811.6%
Lawayne McCoy · WRUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA 0.582 · Total 25.009
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.58225.0099.6%
Pass0.58225.00921.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3665.8507.5%
2nd down0.67413.47913.5%
3rd down1.5939.5617.4%
Standard downs0.1333.3267.9%
Passing downs1.20521.68314.0%
Treyshun Hurry · WRUsage 8.5% · Avg PPA 0.566 · Total 21.503
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56621.5038.5%
Pass0.56621.50319.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2384.0498.0%
2nd down0.92712.0568.8%
3rd down0.6755.3999.9%
Standard downs0.3177.6127.6%
Passing downs0.99213.89110.9%
Marquise Davis · RBUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.570 · Total 9.696
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5709.6968.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5709.69615.0%
1st down0.4955.94212.2%
2nd down0.7513.7547.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.66610.65511.0%
Passing downs-0.959-0.9591.8%
Davin Wydner · QBUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.494 · Total 2.472
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4942.4727.6%
Pass0.6222.48714.3%
Rush-0.015-0.0152.7%
1st down0.0290.0595.7%
2nd down0.7721.5458.7%
3rd down0.8680.86812.5%
Standard downs0.4011.6047.8%
Passing downs0.8680.8686.7%
Lekhy Thompkins · RBUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA -0.094 · Total -0.752
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.094-0.7526.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.094-0.75210.1%
1st down-0.304-1.2166.1%
2nd down0.0000.0017.0%
3rd down0.4630.4635.9%
Standard downs-0.241-1.6867.5%
Passing downs0.9330.9332.9%
Jaleel Skinner · TEUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.917 · Total 22.019
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.91722.0195.4%
Pass0.91722.01912.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.34110.7243.8%
2nd down1.19710.7706.1%
3rd down0.0750.5258.6%
Standard downs0.97812.7084.1%
Passing downs0.8479.3128.5%
Braxton Jennings · RBUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 1.218 · Total 9.745
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2189.7454.0%
Pass2.0682.0681.2%
Rush1.0977.6776.2%
1st down3.4133.4131.0%
2nd down1.2204.8795.8%
3rd down0.4841.4539.1%
Standard downs1.9399.6953.4%
Passing downs0.0170.0505.4%
Briggs Cherry · QBUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 1.682 · Total 3.363
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.6823.3633.0%
Pass1.6823.3637.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.6823.3638.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.1381.1382.0%
Passing downs2.2262.2266.7%
Marlon Harbin · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 1.682 · Total 3.363
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.6823.3633.0%
Pass1.6823.3637.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.6823.3638.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.1381.1382.0%
Passing downs2.2262.2266.7%
T.J. McWilliams · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.524 · Total 1.047
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5241.0473.0%
Pass0.5241.0477.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5241.0475.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5241.0473.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Brody Foley · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA -0.293 · Total -1.467
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.293-1.4672.6%
Pass-0.293-1.4675.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.244-0.7333.3%
2nd down-0.362-0.3621.5%
3rd down-0.372-0.3722.7%
Standard downs-0.274-1.0952.9%
Passing downs-0.372-0.3721.7%
Jackson Voth · WRUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.941 · Total 2.823
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9412.8232.6%
Pass0.9412.8235.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.0762.1525.4%
3rd down0.6710.6714.5%
Standard downs2.0782.0781.3%
Passing downs0.3720.7445.1%
Julius Miles · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.516 · Total -1.031
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.516-1.0311.6%
Pass-0.516-1.0314.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.508-0.5081.5%
2nd down-0.523-0.5232.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.516-1.0312.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Justyn Reid · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.059 · Total 3.178
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0593.1781.6%
Pass1.0593.1783.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6781.3562.3%
2nd down1.8221.8221.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.0593.1782.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Elizjah Lewis · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.868 · Total 0.868
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8680.8681.5%
Pass0.8680.8683.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.8680.86812.5%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.8680.8686.7%
Where Louisville sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.321 (95th percentile; 138 teams)95thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.489 (86th percentile; 138 teams)86thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.419 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.444 (92nd percentile; 138 teams)92ndOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.226 (89th percentile; 138 teams)89thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.085 (42nd percentile; 138 teams)42ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.410 (48th percentile; 138 teams)48thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.225 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.153 (43rd percentile; 138 teams)43rd
Values and percentiles
Louisville metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.32195th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.48986th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.41999th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.44492nd138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.22689th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.08542nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.41048th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.22550th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15343rd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 98% of 187 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.0 yards (64th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 7.7 per completion. Completion 67.4%, 10.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.54.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense65.6%60.8%+4.8157 / 187
Defense allowed60.8%61.9%-1.1209 / 249

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Louisville.

Target mix by zone, Louisville offense
Short left33% · 59Short middle20% · 37Short right31% · 57Deep left3% · 5Deep middle4% · 7Deep right9% · 16

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Louisville passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense18798%9.07.767.4%0.54+4.8 pp157
Passing defense24998%8.15.661.0%0.32-1.1 pp209

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2556.150.2%0.343.201.203.3019.0%69.0%
Defense allowed2763.844.1%0.023.200.900.7010.5%62.8%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense252 / 25524114138110228 / 231 · 98.7%
Defense allowed267 / 2762621416340254 / 256 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +4.8 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-4.94.614.1W1W1 vs Ole Miss: -2.1 ppW2W3W3 vs SMU: +1.0 ppW4W4 vs Wake Forest: +14.1 ppW5W5 vs NC State: +8.0 ppW6W6 vs Florida State: +11.3 ppW7W7 vs Syracuse: -4.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Ole Miss292759.3%61.3%-2.1 pp9.00.57394.20.25
W2Villanova280———4.51.10386.80.36
W3SMU232360.9%59.8%+1.0 pp9.70.54377.20.48
W4Wake Forest363675.0%60.9%+14.1 pp9.20.28372.2-0.00
W5NC State303070.0%62.0%+8.0 pp9.40.462610.70.50
W6Florida State151573.3%62.1%+11.3 pp9.30.44439.50.61
W7Syracuse262653.8%58.8%-4.9 pp12.50.42353.30.17

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

25 punts · 40.0 gross yards/punt · 38.2 net yards/punt

3 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 25/25 punts. Known net yards: 20/25 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 8.1 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Syracuse639.035.45/6
Week 6 · Florida State148.048.01/1
Week 5 · NC State340.035.02/3
Week 4 · Wake Forest236.536.52/2
Week 3 · SMU637.236.45/6
Team style
Rating history