Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Kent State

2026 season

Mid-American
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Kent State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 132 across 8 systems; best 124, worst 134, so they disagree by 10 places.

Lab EPA
#134
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#129
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#132
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#134
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#132
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#125
up 3 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#124
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#134
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#113 of 138
Schedule strength
#52 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#136 of 138
Game control
#121 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#132 of 138
Offense
#135 of 138
Defense
#96 of 138
Special teams
#135 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Kent State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.194 net EPA/play

#134

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-11.95 points

#129 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -10.02 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.33, schedule #74 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.57. That is worth -13.35 on its own; the preseason prior of -7.02 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -11.95.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Kent State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · South Carolina
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856665
-57.00 → -35.00+2.500.76378.47%+6.83-2.7520.578-2.174
Week 2 · Wofford
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866416
+21.00 → +21.00-2.500.79378.80%-25.00 (fixed lower division)1.628-2.200-0.572
Week 3 · Ohio State
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858454
-56.00 → -35.00+2.500.82499.15%+19.19-2.9731.755-1.218
Week 4 · Ball State
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401866425
+13.00 → +13.00-2.500.85729.51%-12.590.998-1.197-0.199
Week 5 · Ohio
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866434
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.89099.88%-1.24-0.543-0.123-0.666
Week 6 · Western Michigan
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866439
-31.00 → -31.00+2.500.925910.27%+0.84-2.9260.086-2.840
Week 7 · South Florida
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862806
-27.00 → -27.00+2.500.962210.67%+3.08-2.6140.329-2.285
Week 8 · Akron
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866446
+15.00 → +15.00-2.501.000011.09%-16.431.386-1.822-0.435

Game terms -10.39 points; prior term -1.56 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -11.95 points. The preseason prior is -7.02 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-21.3 SP+ points

#132 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-15.73 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#125 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -12.47 on 364 plays; defense 3.26 on 358 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Kent State 5 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 0-4 · expected wins 3.3
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (-1.9 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (+5.5 avg)
Head coach
Mark Carney · hired 2025-10-30 · 5-7 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #97 (152 pts) · 2025 #93 (155 pts) · 2026 #122 (162 pts)
Returning
64% of production · 52% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing103%85%
Receiving45%51%
Rushing76%23%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back82.750.82366.59
Defensive Line122.830.81769.81
Linebacker83.000.83346.67
Offensive Line112.820.81909.01
Quarterback42.750.81853.27
Receiver122.830.82979.96
Running Back52.800.82714.14
Special Teams122.920.82209.86

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Dru Deshields · QB

CFBD athlete 5119841. Kent State (2023–2026)

Passing WEPA0.16720754.7%
Pass 93.0% · Rush 21.0%

1st 46.4% · 2nd 59.3% · 3rd 63.1%

Standard downs 50.0% · Passing downs 62.6%

2023: 3★ · 0.8263
Brandon White · RB

CFBD athlete 5327601. Kent State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0085716.7%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 27.0%

1st 20.6% · 2nd 17.9% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 19.4% · Passing downs 12.1%

2026: 3★ · 0.8250
Dru Deshields · QB

CFBD athlete 5119841. Kent State (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2194754.7%
Pass 93.0% · Rush 21.0%

1st 46.4% · 2nd 59.3% · 3rd 63.1%

Standard downs 50.0% · Passing downs 62.6%

2023: 3★ · 0.8263
Mason Blakemore · RB

CFBD athlete 4875755. Illinois State (2023–2025); Kent State (2026–2026); Northern Illinois (2021–2022)

Rushing WEPA0.0934315.6%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 26.0%

1st 22.1% · 2nd 16.5% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 19.5% · Passing downs 9.5%

2021: stars unavailable
Sean Leonard · PK

CFBD athlete 5258331. Kent State (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-7.2808—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: 3★ · 0.8000
Tommy Newcomb · PK

CFBD athlete 5194691. Kent State (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR-2.4801—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 2★ · 0.7956
Ardell Banks · WR

CFBD athlete 5027432. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 11.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 7.5%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 7.2%

Not linked
Ayden Harris · RB

CFBD athlete 5146972. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 8.9%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Brendyn Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5291801. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 18.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 17.7% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 14.7%

Not linked
Da'Realyst Clark · WR

CFBD athlete 5295590. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 15.7% · Rush 1.2%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 8.6% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 8.0% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked
Deante Ruffin · QB

CFBD athlete 5141625. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.9%
Pass 13.6% · Rush 6.3%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 12.5% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 11.5%

Not linked
Donovan Delaney · RB

CFBD athlete 5150825. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 1.2% · Rush 12.8%

1st 8.7% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 8.2% · Passing downs 5.2%

Not linked
Ethan Thanthanavong · QB

CFBD athlete 5388310. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Hunter Hopperton · FB

CFBD athlete 5083407. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 7.9% · Rush 3.1%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 9.3%

Standard downs 4.9% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Jakorion Caffey · RB

CFBD athlete 5126524. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.6%
Pass 3.9% · Rush 15.6%

1st 12.2% · 2nd 10.8% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 10.5% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Jared Kelley · WR

CFBD athlete 5122047. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.6%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked
Jay Jay Etheridge · WR

CFBD athlete 5222386. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Matthew Maxey · WR

CFBD athlete 5263587. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Nolan Good · QB

CFBD athlete 5222633. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.1%
Pass 9.3% · Rush 6.3%

1st 5.1% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 11.1%

Not linked
Teaunn Hunter · WR

CFBD athlete 5212938. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Terik Mulder · TE

CFBD athlete 5088143. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Tommy Arnold · TE

CFBD athlete 5295588. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Wayne Harris · WR

CFBD athlete 5147053. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.1%
Pass 25.2% · Rush 0.4%

1st 9.1% · 2nd 11.7% · 3rd 16.4%

Standard downs 11.1% · Passing downs 13.7%

Not linked
Zy'Aire Fletcher · TE

CFBD athlete 5211188. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 1.2% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 11 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Davion Pritchard · CBPittsburgh2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dylan Armentrout · RBNot reported2026-01-112★ / —Immediate
Ethan Thanthanavong · QBNot reported2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Hayden Dawahare · LBKentucky2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jakorion Caffey · RBCincinnati2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Javier Willis · WRTiffin University2026-01-293★ / 0.8300Immediate
Mason King · RBIllinois State2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Nate Gregory · LBCoastal Carolina2026-01-273★ / 0.8400Immediate
Norey Johnson · SHouston Christian2026-01-123★ / 0.8200Immediate
Quan Rhodes-McKee · LBDuquesne2026-01-243★ / 0.8100Immediate
Rocco Nicholl · LBSouth Florida2026-01-243★ / 0.8400Immediate
Outgoing · 15 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ashton Rivera · IOLCalifornia2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
CJ Montes · QBNot reported2025-12-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cade Wolford · WRCincinnati2026-01-094★ / 0.9000Immediate
Canaan Williams · LBNot reported2025-12-063★ / —Immediate
Charlie Durkin · PRice2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Da'Shawn Martin · WRVirginia2026-01-173★ / 0.8700Immediate
Devin Kargman · QBMaryland2026-02-043★ / 0.8300Immediate
Garrett Masterson · OTTennessee Tech2026-01-093★ / 0.8300Immediate
Gavin Garcia · RBNot reported2025-12-283★ / —Immediate
Jaire Rawlinson · CBWest Virginia2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jamond Mathis · EDGETexas Tech2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Joel Boamah · CBNot reported2025-12-283★ / —Immediate
Junior Diallo · OTTennessee Tech2026-01-303★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nylan Brown · LBWashington State2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Will Hryszko · KOhio2026-02-04— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Kent State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Mark Carney · career 5–7 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 19 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Mark Carney · active at capture

    5–7 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2025-10-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2023–2024 · Kenni Burns

    1–23 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2022-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2022 · Sean Lewis

    24–31 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2017-12-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2013–2017 · Paul Haynes

    14–45 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2011–2012 · Darrell Hazell

    16–10 · 26 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2010-12-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2004–2010 · Doug Martin

    29–53 · 82 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2004-03-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1998–2003 · Dean Pees

    17–51 · 68 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1994–1997 · Jim Corrigall

    8–35–1 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1991–1993 · Pete Cordelli

    3–30 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1988–1990 · Dick Crum

    7–26 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1986–1987 · Glen Mason

    12–10 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1983–1985 · Dick Scesniak

    8–25 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1981–1982 · Ed Chlebek

    4–18 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1978–1980 · Ron Blackledge

    8–25 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1975–1977 · Dennis Fitzgerald

    18–16 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1971–1974 · Don James

    25–19–1 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1968–1970 · Dave Puddington

    9–21 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1964–1967 · Leo Strang

    17–20–2 · 39 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1962–1963 · Trevor Rees

    6–11–1 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Mark Carney · incomplete attribution0–0——-22.3-14.4122—
2025 · Mark Carney5–74–40–0-19.3-16.193—
2024 · Kenni Burns0–120–80–0-33-26.897—
2023 · Kenni Burns1–110–80–0-26.3-27123—
2022 · Sean Lewis5–74–40–0-13.1-6.490—
2021 · Sean Lewis7–76–30–1-6.4-13.5118—
2020 · Sean Lewis3–13–10–0-7.5—108—
2019 · Sean Lewis7–65–31–0-10.2-7.2102—
2018 · Sean Lewis2–101–70–0-20.4-19.4100—
2017 · Paul Haynes2–101–70–0-20.2-22.7128—
2016 · Paul Haynes3–92–60–0-12-10.5131—
2015 · Paul Haynes3–92–60–0-11.9-17.9102—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:28:28 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play133 / 1383.6103 / 13825.5
Success rate136 / 1381.5128 / 1387.3
Explosiveness32 / 13877.443 / 13869.3
Standard-down success135 / 1382.2132 / 1384.4
Passing-down success119 / 13813.969 / 13850.4
Pass PPA109 / 13821.294 / 13832.1
Rush PPA135 / 1382.291 / 13834.3
Pass explosiveness24 / 13883.250 / 13864.2
Rush explosiveness88 / 13836.545 / 13867.9
Line yards134 / 1382.9118 / 13814.6
Second-level yards133 / 1383.6112 / 13819.0
Open-field yards132 / 1384.4T52 / 13862.4
Stuff rate124 / 13810.2113 / 13818.2
Power success131 / 1385.134 / 13875.9
HavocT107 / 13821.9T76 / 13844.5
Front-seven havocT70 / 13849.356 / 13859.9
DB havocT126 / 1388.4T92 / 13832.1
Points / opportunity137 / 1380.7127 / 1388.0
Average field positionT114 / 13817.2T111 / 13817.5
Field-position expected points98 / 13829.2T116 / 13815.7

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Dru Deshields · QBUsage 54.7% · Avg PPA 0.116 · Total 32.708
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11632.70854.7%
Pass0.12628.32493.0%
Rush0.33417.70621.0%
1st down0.0131.30146.4%
2nd down0.0272.62659.3%
3rd down0.49838.36863.1%
Standard downs0.06510.52150.0%
Passing downs0.18622.18762.6%
Brandon White · RBUsage 16.7% · Avg PPA -0.184 · Total -15.805
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.184-15.80516.7%
Pass-0.117-2.1097.4%
Rush-0.201-13.69627.0%
1st down-0.296-12.71120.6%
2nd down-0.248-7.20017.9%
3rd down0.1501.95010.7%
Standard downs-0.162-10.19819.4%
Passing downs-0.244-5.60712.1%
Mason Blakemore · RBUsage 15.6% · Avg PPA -0.064 · Total -3.863
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.064-3.86315.6%
Pass-0.080-0.7225.2%
Rush-0.062-3.14026.0%
1st down-0.265-9.02222.1%
2nd down0.0460.92416.5%
3rd down0.2901.4495.3%
Standard downs-0.164-7.52519.5%
Passing downs0.2623.6629.5%
Wayne Harris · WRUsage 12.1% · Avg PPA 0.503 · Total 31.163
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.50331.16312.1%
Pass0.51831.59325.2%
Rush-0.430-0.4300.4%
1st down0.82715.7169.1%
2nd down0.2384.52511.7%
3rd down0.68313.66016.4%
Standard downs0.39114.07111.1%
Passing downs0.65717.09113.7%
Brendyn Smith · WRUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA 0.403 · Total 9.680
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4039.6809.6%
Pass0.4039.68018.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5473.2815.9%
2nd down0.0300.41517.7%
3rd down1.4965.9847.1%
Standard downs0.8748.7356.5%
Passing downs0.0670.94414.7%
Jakorion Caffey · RBUsage 9.6% · Avg PPA -0.361 · Total -15.513
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.361-15.5139.6%
Pass-0.562-4.4973.9%
Rush-0.315-11.01615.6%
1st down-0.594-13.06912.2%
2nd down-0.305-4.58010.8%
3rd down0.3562.1375.6%
Standard downs-0.430-12.46510.5%
Passing downs-0.218-3.0488.2%
Deante Ruffin · QBUsage 8.9% · Avg PPA -0.160 · Total -0.799
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.160-0.7998.9%
Pass-0.230-0.69013.6%
Rush-0.055-0.1096.3%
1st down-0.017-0.0174.8%
2nd down-0.296-0.59312.5%
3rd down-0.095-0.18911.8%
Standard downs-0.156-0.3126.7%
Passing downs-0.162-0.48711.5%
Nolan Good · QBUsage 8.1% · Avg PPA -0.462 · Total -9.246
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.462-9.2468.1%
Pass-0.687-6.8659.3%
Rush0.4533.6216.3%
1st down-0.156-0.7795.1%
2nd down-0.966-5.7978.2%
3rd down0.1741.38911.8%
Standard downs-0.124-1.1126.0%
Passing downs-0.739-8.13411.1%
Da'Realyst Clark · WRUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 0.385 · Total 15.775
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.38515.7758.0%
Pass0.54020.53315.7%
Rush-1.586-4.7581.2%
1st down-0.207-2.2765.3%
2nd down0.2112.9588.6%
3rd down1.10015.39411.5%
Standard downs-0.141-3.6688.0%
Passing downs1.29619.4427.9%
Donovan Delaney · RBUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA -0.233 · Total -2.797
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.233-2.7976.9%
Pass-0.023-0.0231.2%
Rush-0.252-2.77412.8%
1st down-0.373-2.2378.7%
2nd down-0.218-0.8727.7%
3rd down0.1560.3124.2%
Standard downs-0.295-2.3608.2%
Passing downs-0.109-0.4375.2%
Ardell Banks · WRUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.022 · Total 0.561
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0220.5615.4%
Pass0.0220.56111.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6204.9634.2%
2nd down-0.508-3.0464.1%
3rd down1.33210.6597.5%
Standard downs-0.138-1.7914.4%
Passing downs0.1962.3527.2%
Hunter Hopperton · FBUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA 0.171 · Total 3.929
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1713.9295.2%
Pass0.2644.2237.9%
Rush-0.042-0.2953.1%
1st down-0.137-0.4121.7%
2nd down0.5703.9935.0%
3rd down0.2222.2199.3%
Standard downs0.1852.5964.9%
Passing downs0.1481.3325.6%
Ayden Harris · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -0.200 · Total -1.001
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.200-1.0014.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.200-1.0018.9%
1st down-0.453-0.4532.5%
2nd down-0.203-0.4066.5%
3rd down-0.071-0.1426.3%
Standard downs-0.453-0.4531.8%
Passing downs-0.137-0.5488.2%
Terik Mulder · TEUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.825 · Total 6.601
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8256.6013.3%
Pass0.8256.6017.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.703-1.4062.0%
2nd down0.7672.3014.0%
3rd down1.9025.7054.5%
Standard downs0.5092.0382.6%
Passing downs1.1414.5634.4%
Ethan Thanthanavong · QBUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA 0.472 · Total 0.944
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4720.9441.9%
Pass0.4720.9444.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.4191.4192.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.474-0.4743.1%
Standard downs0.4720.9443.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jared Kelley · WRUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.362 · Total -2.172
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.362-2.1721.9%
Pass-0.403-2.0173.4%
Rush-0.155-0.1550.6%
1st down-0.517-1.0341.6%
2nd down-0.572-1.1432.0%
3rd down0.0030.0052.6%
Standard downs-0.517-1.0341.1%
Passing downs-0.285-1.1383.0%
Zy'Aire Fletcher · TEUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA 0.087 · Total 0.433
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0870.4331.9%
Pass0.0870.4333.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1090.1090.9%
2nd down1.0781.0781.2%
3rd down-0.251-0.7544.8%
Standard downs0.2370.7121.9%
Passing downs-0.140-0.2791.9%
Matthew Maxey · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA -0.298 · Total -0.298
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.298-0.2981.8%
Pass-0.298-0.2984.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.298-0.2986.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.298-0.2983.8%
Jay Jay Etheridge · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.278 · Total 0.556
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2780.5561.7%
Pass0.2780.5563.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2780.5564.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2780.5563.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Teaunn Hunter · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.595 · Total -1.189
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.595-1.1891.6%
Pass-0.595-1.1893.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.595-1.1895.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.595-1.1892.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tommy Arnold · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.395 · Total -0.395
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.395-0.3951.4%
Pass-0.395-0.3952.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.395-0.3953.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.395-0.3952.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Kent State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.053 (4th percentile; 138 teams)4thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.341 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.299 (77th percentile; 138 teams)77thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.097 (21st percentile; 138 teams)21stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.124 (2nd percentile; 138 teams)2ndDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.147 (26th percentile; 138 teams)26thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.467 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.176 (69th percentile; 138 teams)69thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.154 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45th
Values and percentiles
Kent State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0534th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.3411st138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.29977th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.09721st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.1242nd138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.14726th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.4677th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.17669th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15445th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 233 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.1 yards (67th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.9 per completion. Completion 55.4%, 6.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.12.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense54.6%60.5%-5.8205 / 233
Defense allowed69.8%60.6%+9.3189 / 218

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Kent State.

Target mix by zone, Kent State offense
Short left27% · 60Short middle19% · 42Short right38% · 87Deep left5% · 12Deep middle3% · 7Deep right8% · 18

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Kent State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense233100%9.14.955.4%0.12-5.8 pp205
Passing defense21899%9.45.367.4%0.35+9.3 pp189

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2703.033.6%-0.082.500.800.5020.6%60.6%
Defense allowed2794.246.1%0.143.301.100.9014.5%65.9%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense265 / 270261913440253 / 253 · 100.0%
Defense allowed273 / 2792582118550254 / 256 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -5.8 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-24.9-9.65.8W1W1 vs South Carolina: -10.7 ppW2W3W3 vs Ohio State: -24.9 ppW4W4 vs Ball State: +5.8 ppW5W5 vs Ohio: -3.2 ppW6W6 vs Western Michigan: -6.2 ppW7W7 vs South Florida: -4.5 ppW8W8 vs Akron: -2.8 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1South Carolina232360.9%71.5%-10.7 pp3.2-0.18254.0-0.07
W2Wofford280———10.40.10444.10.15
W3Ohio State212138.1%63.0%-24.9 pp6.9-0.35332.6-0.27
W4Ball State252564.0%58.2%+5.8 pp9.60.60433.90.01
W5Ohio353557.1%60.3%-3.2 pp8.70.04311.60.00
W6Western Michigan353554.3%60.5%-6.2 pp9.70.13332.3-0.09
W7South Florida333351.5%56.1%-4.5 pp12.2-0.03352.3-0.40
W8Akron333354.5%57.4%-2.8 pp10.10.53263.2-0.10

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

36 punts · 41.1 gross yards/punt · 37.3 net yards/punt

11 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 36/36 punts. Known net yards: 30/36 punts.

Our punt returns

4 returns · 6.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 4/4 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Akron241.531.52/2
Week 7 · South Florida440.840.54/4
Week 6 · Western Michigan446.336.34/4
Week 5 · Ohio329.028.73/3
Week 4 · Ball State538.239.54/5
Team style
Rating history