Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Iowa

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Iowa's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 35 across 8 systems; best 11, worst 72, so they disagree by 61 places.

Lab EPA
#72
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#35
down 102026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#23
down 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#11
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#35
down 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#49
down 3 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#30
down 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#72
down 112026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#30 of 138
Schedule strength
#35 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#41 of 138
Game control
#35 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#26 of 138
Offense
#57 of 138
Defense
#13 of 138
Special teams
#48 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Iowa · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

5-2 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.013 net EPA/play

#72

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

6.88 points

#35 · Down 10 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +9.12 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -2.07, schedule #62 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +1.55. That is worth +7.05 on its own; the preseason prior of +6.37 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +6.88.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Iowa · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Northern Illinois
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858426
+40.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.48%-21.353.081-2.0241.057
Week 2 · Iowa State
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856788
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.79379.85%+0.540.0490.0530.103
Week 3 · Northern Iowa
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858471
+55.00 → +35.00-2.500.824910.24%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.328-2.5600.768
Week 4 · Michigan
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858463
+1.00 → +1.00+2.500.857210.64%+6.070.3720.6461.019
Week 5 · Ohio State
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858473
-17.00 → -17.00-2.500.890911.06%+19.19-2.1562.122-0.035
Week 6 · Washington
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858487
+17.00 → +17.00+2.500.925911.49%+2.072.2410.2382.479
Week 8 · Minnesota
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858497
-3.00 → -3.00+2.501.000012.41%-0.24-0.062-0.030-0.092

Game terms +5.30 points; prior term +1.58 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +6.88 points. The preseason prior is +6.37 with 24.83% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

12.4 SP+ points

#23 · Down 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

4.18 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#49 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 1.33 on 324 plays; defense -2.86 on 331 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Iowa 37 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
5-2 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 2-1 · expected wins 3.8
Polls (Week 9)
Coaches Poll #24
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-3 ATS (+3.8 avg) · 2025: 10-3 ATS (+6.3 avg)
Head coach
Kirk Ferentz · hired 1998-12-02 · 27-13 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #32 (215 pts) · 2025 #38 (208 pts) · 2026 #26 (229 pts)
Returning
34% of production · 40% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing16%9%
Receiving56%50%
Rushing20%56%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back103.100.86308.63
Defensive Line133.080.866111.26
Linebacker103.500.87868.79
Offensive Line143.430.886812.41
Quarterback53.000.85234.26
Receiver173.120.872514.83
Running Back53.000.86474.32
Special Teams162.940.848913.58

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Hank Brown · QB

CFBD athlete 5089314. Auburn (2023–2024); Iowa (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.33413442.7%
Pass 74.0% · Rush 10.5%

1st 36.2% · 2nd 44.4% · 3rd 56.4%

Standard downs 39.6% · Passing downs 50.0%

2023: 3★ · 0.8489
Kamari Moulton · RB

CFBD athlete 5093886. Iowa (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2988925.4%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 47.5%

1st 33.7% · 2nd 28.8% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 29.1% · Passing downs 16.4%

2023: 3★ · 0.8489
Jeremy Hecklinski · QB

CFBD athlete 5121030. Wake Forest (2024–2024); Iowa (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.3725721.1%
Pass 44.8% · Rush 0.6%

1st 14.8% · 2nd 22.9% · 3rd 33.3%

Standard downs 18.6% · Passing downs 28.2%

2024: 3★ · 0.8803
Caden Buhr · PK

CFBD athlete 5295545. Iowa (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR6.29012—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Addison Ostrenga · TE

CFBD athlete 4873456. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 8.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Braeden Jackson · RB

CFBD athlete 5295539. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 10.5%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 5.9% · Passing downs 7.3%

Not linked
Brevin Doll · RB

CFBD athlete 5142261. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.6%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Brody Schaffer · WR

CFBD athlete 5272774. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
DJ Vonnahme · TE

CFBD athlete 5218931. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.3%
Pass 20.3% · Rush 0.6%

1st 6.5% · 2nd 9.6% · 3rd 20.3%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 18.2%

Not linked
Dayton Howard · WR

CFBD athlete 5119233. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 5.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Evan James · WR

CFBD athlete 5300482. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 7.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Jarriett Buie · WR

CFBD athlete 5075920. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Jimmy Sullivan · QB

CFBD athlete 5192909. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 10.3% · Rush 2.6%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 21.4%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 11.5%

Not linked
KJ Parker · WR

CFBD athlete 5084300. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
L.J. Phillips Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5155048. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.1%
Pass 0.8% · Rush 19.5%

1st 13.3% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 12.3% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Mason Woods · TE

CFBD athlete 5214549. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 4.4% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 2.5%

Not linked
Nathan Mcneil · RB

CFBD athlete 5246572. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.7%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 15.8%

1st 15.3% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 12.3% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
O'Lontae Dean · RB

CFBD athlete 5198313. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 1.6% · Rush 14.1%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 8.9% · 3rd 18.2%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 15.0%

Not linked
Reece Vander Zee · WR

CFBD athlete 5138293. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Thomas Meyer · TE

CFBD athlete 5142597. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Tony Diaz · WR

CFBD athlete 5300856. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.1%
Pass 24.6% · Rush 2.7%

1st 13.7% · 2nd 12.4% · 3rd 12.6%

Standard downs 13.2% · Passing downs 12.9%

Not linked
Xavier Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 5142226. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.7%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 12.6%

1st 9.6% · 2nd 5.5% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 9.0% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Zach Ortwerth · TE

CFBD athlete 4950379. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 15 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anthony Hawkins · SVillanova2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Brice Stevenson · DLHoly Cross2026-01-053★ / 0.8300Immediate
Cody Haddad · SOhio State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Eli Ozick · KNorth Dakota State2026-01-04— / —Immediate
Emmanuel Olagbaju · DLNorth Dakota2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Evan James · WRFurman2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kahmari Brown · EDGEElon2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
L.J. Phillips Jr. · RBSouth Dakota2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Lance Beeghley · WRSMU2026-01-183★ / 0.8300Immediate
Lance Ingold · EDGENorthern Illinois2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tanner Philpott · PNot reported2026-01-19— / —Immediate
Tony Diaz · WRNot reported2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Trent Wilson · IOLJames Madison2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyler Brown · SJames Madison2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Xavier Styles · SRobert Morris2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 8 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brian Allen · EDGEVanderbilt2026-01-114★ / 0.9100Immediate
CJ Bell Jr. · CBUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jackson Stratton · QBNot reported2025-11-303★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jaziun Patterson · RBMichigan State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kael Kolarik · SSouth Dakota2026-01-13— / —Immediate
Koen Entringer · SLouisville2026-01-103★ / 0.8900Immediate
Rhys Dakin · PMichigan State2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
TJ Washington Jr. · RBNew Mexico State2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Iowa. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Kirk Ferentz · career 213–128 across 28 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 21 appointments
  1. 1999–present · Kirk Ferentz · active at capture

    213–128 · 341 attributed games · 28 seasons

    Hired 1998-12-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 1979–1998 · Hayden Fry

    143–89–6 · 238 attributed games · 20 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 1974–1978 · Bob Commings

    17–38 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1971–1973 · Frank Lauterbur

    4–28–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1966–1970 · Ray Nagel

    16–32–2 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1961–1965 · Jerry Burns

    16–27–2 · 45 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1952–1960 · Forest Evashevski

    52–27–4 · 83 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1950–1951 · Leonard Raffensperger

    5–10–3 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1946–1949 · Edward Anderson

    16–19–1 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1945–1945 · Clem Crowe

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1943–1944 · Slip Madigan

    2–13–1 · 16 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1939–1942 · Edward Anderson

    19–14–1 · 34 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1937–1938 · Irl Tubbs

    2–13–1 · 16 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1932–1936 · Ossie Solem

    15–21–4 · 40 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1924–1931 · Burton Ingwersen

    33–27–4 · 64 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1916–1923 · Howard Jones

    42–17–1 · 60 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1910–1915 · Jesse Hawley

    24–18 · 42 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1909–1909 · John Griffith

    2–4–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1906–1908 · Mark Catlin

    7–10 · 17 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1903–1905 · John Chalmers

    24–8 · 32 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1899–1902 · Alden Knipe

    26–7–2 · 35 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Kirk Ferentz · incomplete attribution0–0——13.69.926—
2025 · Kirk Ferentz9–46–31–019.713.83817
2024 · Kirk Ferentz8–56–30–115.812.432—
2023 · Kirk Ferentz10–47–30–15.85.74124
2022 · Kirk Ferentz8–55–41–012.79.530—
2021 · Kirk Ferentz10–47–30–111.48.62323
2020 · Kirk Ferentz6–26–20–016.315.93516
2019 · Kirk Ferentz10–36–31–016.715.74115
2018 · Kirk Ferentz9–45–41–013.315.439—
2017 · Kirk Ferentz8–54–51–09.816.341—
2016 · Kirk Ferentz8–56–30–110.31147—
2015 · Kirk Ferentz12–28–10–19.311.1599
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 23:17:13 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play86 / 13838.024 / 13883.2
Success rate61 / 13856.27 / 13895.6
Explosiveness80 / 13842.320 / 13886.1
Standard-down success40 / 13871.518 / 13887.6
Passing-down success124 / 13810.28 / 13894.9
Pass PPA69 / 13850.489 / 13835.8
Rush PPA59 / 13857.72 / 13899.3
Pass explosiveness135 / 1382.2117 / 13815.3
Rush explosiveness11 / 13892.71 / 138100.0
Line yards33 / 13876.610 / 13893.4
Second-level yards19 / 13886.91 / 138100.0
Open-field yards19 / 13886.93 / 13898.5
Stuff rate62 / 13855.5T37 / 13873.4
Power successT127 / 1386.9T40 / 13869.7
HavocT30 / 13878.1T35 / 13874.5
Front-seven havocT16 / 13888.7T46 / 13865.7
DB havocT98 / 13828.8T36 / 13873.4
Points / opportunity77 / 13844.537 / 13873.7
Average field positionT20 / 13885.46 / 13896.4
Field-position expected points13 / 13891.27 / 13895.6

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Hank Brown · QBUsage 42.7% · Avg PPA 0.067 · Total 11.001
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.06711.00142.7%
Pass0.24434.62074.0%
Rush-0.550-10.44610.5%
1st down0.15910.03536.2%
2nd down-0.077-4.29944.4%
3rd down0.25311.12656.4%
Standard downs0.10210.90139.6%
Passing downs0.0020.10050.0%
Kamari Moulton · RBUsage 25.4% · Avg PPA 0.174 · Total 16.733
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.17416.73325.4%
Pass-0.152-1.6675.9%
Rush0.21618.40047.5%
1st down0.21011.96533.7%
2nd down0.0712.55128.8%
3rd down0.7392.2183.8%
Standard downs0.24318.96829.1%
Passing downs-0.124-2.23516.4%
Jeremy Hecklinski · QBUsage 21.1% · Avg PPA 0.080 · Total 5.461
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0805.46121.1%
Pass0.19412.60644.8%
Rush1.6421.6420.6%
1st down0.53412.29314.8%
2nd down-0.141-3.39322.9%
3rd down0.2354.46033.3%
Standard downs0.1737.59918.6%
Passing downs-0.089-2.13928.2%
Tony Diaz · WRUsage 13.1% · Avg PPA 0.122 · Total 7.067
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1227.06713.1%
Pass0.0753.91324.6%
Rush0.5263.1542.7%
1st down0.2085.83213.7%
2nd down0.0130.24112.4%
3rd down0.4314.74512.6%
Standard downs0.1566.54813.2%
Passing downs0.0320.51912.9%
Nathan Mcneil · RBUsage 10.7% · Avg PPA 0.226 · Total 6.540
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2266.54010.7%
Pass0.1270.8895.6%
Rush0.2575.65215.8%
1st down0.3256.17015.3%
2nd down-0.354-2.8339.1%
3rd down1.6023.2033.8%
Standard downs0.2886.90812.3%
Passing downs-0.073-0.3676.7%
DJ Vonnahme · TEUsage 10.3% · Avg PPA 0.532 · Total 20.740
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.53220.74010.3%
Pass0.54820.83520.3%
Rush-0.095-0.0950.6%
1st down0.3293.6196.5%
2nd down0.1742.0849.6%
3rd down0.94015.03720.3%
Standard downs0.57110.8587.1%
Passing downs0.4949.88118.2%
L.J. Phillips Jr. · RBUsage 10.1% · Avg PPA -0.241 · Total -6.258
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.241-6.25810.1%
Pass1.1131.1130.8%
Rush-0.295-7.37119.5%
1st down-0.069-1.10313.3%
2nd down-0.555-4.99110.6%
3rd down-0.164-0.1642.0%
Standard downs-0.202-4.63912.3%
Passing downs-0.540-1.6194.2%
O'Lontae Dean · RBUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.108 · Total 1.301
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1081.3018.4%
Pass-1.153-1.1531.6%
Rush0.2232.45414.1%
1st down-1.133-3.3984.2%
2nd down-0.210-0.8388.9%
3rd down0.6302.51918.2%
Standard downs-0.098-0.5855.8%
Passing downs0.3141.88615.0%
Xavier Williams · RBUsage 7.7% · Avg PPA 0.255 · Total 7.636
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2557.6367.7%
Pass0.3861.9302.8%
Rush0.2285.70612.6%
1st down0.4187.1059.6%
2nd down0.2231.5615.5%
3rd down-0.172-1.0307.9%
Standard downs0.3949.8619.0%
Passing downs-0.445-2.2244.6%
Braeden Jackson · RBUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 0.228 · Total 5.471
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2285.4716.3%
Pass1.4525.8082.2%
Rush-0.017-0.33710.5%
1st down0.2231.5633.9%
2nd down1.57511.0225.6%
3rd down-0.332-2.98712.5%
Standard downs0.2413.8565.9%
Passing downs0.2021.6157.3%
Jimmy Sullivan · QBUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 0.019 · Total 0.094
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0190.0946.3%
Pass-0.311-1.24610.3%
Rush1.3401.3402.6%
1st down0.1450.2895.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.065-0.19521.4%
Standard downs0.1450.2893.8%
Passing downs-0.065-0.19511.5%
Addison Ostrenga · TEUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.193 · Total 3.288
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1933.2883.8%
Pass0.1933.2888.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.159-0.4761.5%
2nd down0.1320.9274.8%
3rd down0.4052.8378.0%
Standard downs0.1741.7363.1%
Passing downs0.2221.5535.6%
Evan James · WRUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA -0.181 · Total -2.354
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.181-2.3543.5%
Pass-0.181-2.3547.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1820.9082.8%
2nd down-0.210-0.8393.3%
3rd down-0.606-2.4235.6%
Standard downs-0.019-0.1493.0%
Passing downs-0.441-2.2054.8%
Jarriett Buie · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.255 · Total 1.783
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2551.7832.7%
Pass0.2551.7835.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4150.8301.6%
2nd down0.4481.3443.5%
3rd down-0.196-0.3914.2%
Standard downs-0.074-0.3722.6%
Passing downs1.0782.1552.7%
Dayton Howard · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.262 · Total -0.786
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.262-0.7862.3%
Pass-0.262-0.7865.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.418-0.4181.6%
2nd down-0.184-0.3674.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0360.0712.1%
Passing downs-0.857-0.8572.9%
Mason Woods · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.066 · Total -0.198
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.066-0.1982.1%
Pass-0.066-0.1984.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.051-1.0511.4%
2nd down0.4260.8534.4%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.488-0.9761.9%
Passing downs0.7780.7782.5%
Thomas Meyer · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.225 · Total -1.124
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.225-1.1242.1%
Pass-0.225-1.1244.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0840.0840.9%
2nd down-0.152-0.4553.8%
3rd down-0.752-0.7522.0%
Standard downs-0.225-1.1242.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Zach Ortwerth · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.453 · Total 2.266
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4532.2662.0%
Pass0.4532.2664.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4532.2664.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.4532.2662.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Reece Vander Zee · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 2.569 · Total 2.569
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.5692.5691.7%
Pass2.5692.5692.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.5692.5694.2%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs2.5692.5692.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
KJ Parker · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.473 · Total -0.473
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.473-0.4731.6%
Pass-0.473-0.4734.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.473-0.47312.5%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.473-0.4737.1%
Brevin Doll · RBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.811 · Total -0.811
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.811-0.8111.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.811-0.8112.6%
1st down-0.811-0.8112.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.811-0.8111.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Brody Schaffer · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.789 · Total -0.789
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.789-0.7891.3%
Pass-0.789-0.7892.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.789-0.7897.1%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.789-0.7893.8%
Where Iowa sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.103 (38th percentile; 138 teams)38thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.437 (56th percentile; 138 teams)56thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.215 (42nd percentile; 138 teams)42ndOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.218 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.125 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.025 (83rd percentile; 138 teams)83rdDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.337 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.129 (86th percentile; 138 teams)86thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.175 (74th percentile; 138 teams)74th
Values and percentiles
Iowa metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.10338th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.43756th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.21542nd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.21850th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.12558th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.02583rd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.33796th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.12986th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.17574th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 216 attempts charted. Average depth of target 7.7 yards (20th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.2 per completion. Completion 61.1%, 6.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.12.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense58.9%62.7%-3.8192 / 216
Defense allowed61.0%58.7%+2.4172 / 209

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Iowa.

Target mix by zone, Iowa offense
Short left33% · 69Short middle21% · 43Short right33% · 69Deep left4% · 9Deep middle2% · 5Deep right7% · 14

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Iowa passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense216100%7.76.261.1%0.12-3.8 pp192
Passing defense20999%9.95.558.4%0.32+2.4 pp172

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2215.544.2%0.183.401.201.6015.8%62.5%
Defense allowed2372.433.8%-0.172.600.500.3019.7%66.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense218 / 22121836000215 / 215 · 100.0%
Defense allowed233 / 237231622220213 / 213 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.8 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-11.20.211.6W1W1 vs Northern Illinois: -7.1 ppW2W2 vs Iowa State: +5.3 ppW3W4W4 vs Michigan: -2.9 ppW5W5 vs Ohio State: -11.2 ppW6W6 vs Washington: +11.6 ppW8W8 vs Minnesota: -9.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Northern Illinois404052.5%59.6%-7.1 pp7.9-0.07386.70.18
W2Iowa State303070.0%64.7%+5.3 pp8.40.19293.2-0.17
W3Northern Iowa230———4.30.414110.50.86
W4Michigan353458.8%61.7%-2.9 pp9.40.32242.4-0.29
W5Ohio State323253.1%64.4%-11.2 pp7.30.12211.9-0.02
W6Washington191973.7%62.1%+11.6 pp8.20.66386.90.32
W8Minnesota373754.1%64.0%-9.9 pp7.4-0.39303.0-0.10

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

34 punts · 42.4 gross yards/punt · 35.7 net yards/punt

10 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 34/34 punts. Known net yards: 23/34 punts.

Our punt returns

21 returns · 12.4 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

2 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 21/21 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Minnesota739.928.67/7
Week 6 · Washington442.0—0/4
Week 5 · Ohio State441.837.73/4
Week 4 · Michigan642.334.73/6
Week 3 · Northern Iowa444.541.33/4
Team style
Rating history