Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Indiana

2026 season

Big Ten
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Indiana's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 5 across 8 systems; best 2, worst 7, so they disagree by 5 places.

Lab EPA
#4
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#6
down 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#6
down 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#2
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#6
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#3
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#7
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#4
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#5 of 138
Schedule strength
#25 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#64 of 138
Game control
#7 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#6 of 138
Offense
#11 of 138
Defense
#6 of 138
Special teams
#112 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Indiana · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

7-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.231 net EPA/play

#4

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

17.33 points

#6 · Down 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +16.17 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +2.42, schedule #19 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +5.91. That is worth +18.59 on its own; the preseason prior of +12.91 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +17.33.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Indiana · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · North Texas
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858425
+36.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.47%+5.882.7520.4983.250
Week 2 · Howard
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858439
+55.00 → +35.00-2.500.79378.80%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.860-2.2000.660
Week 3 · Western Kentucky
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858449
+38.00 → +35.00-2.500.82499.15%-7.942.973-0.7272.246
Week 4 · Northwestern
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858461
+6.00 → +6.00-2.500.85729.51%+10.950.3331.0411.373
Week 5 · Rutgers
away · 2026-10-04 · ID 401858477
+32.00 → +32.00+2.500.89099.88%-5.703.408-0.5632.845
Week 6 · Nebraska
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858481
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.925910.27%+10.820.5651.1101.675
Week 7 · Ohio State
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858488
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.962210.67%+19.19-0.6942.0471.354
Week 8 · Michigan
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858496
+7.00 → +1.00 (OT)+2.501.000011.09%+6.070.3880.6731.062

Game terms +14.46 points; prior term +2.86 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +17.33 points. The preseason prior is +12.91 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

24.2 SP+ points

#6 · Down 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

26.14 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#3 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 9.04 on 374 plays; defense -17.10 on 413 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Indiana 2 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
7-1 · conf 4-1 · home 4-1 · away 3-0 · expected wins 6.3
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #4 · Coaches Poll #4
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 1-7 ATS (-3.4 avg) · 2025: 10-6 ATS (+12.9 avg)
Head coach
Curt Cignetti · hired 2023-11-30 · 27-2 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #65 (180 pts) · 2025 #47 (202 pts) · 2026 #29 (226 pts)
Returning
17% of production · 12% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing2%1%
Receiving24%15%
Rushing25%18%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back123.170.876710.52
Defensive Line153.200.873813.11
Linebacker73.140.87346.11
Offensive Line152.930.855512.83
Quarterback53.000.84864.24
Receiver163.060.868313.89
Running Back33.000.86592.60
Special Teams43.250.85003.40

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Josh Hoover · QB

CFBD athlete 4685401. Indiana (2026–2026); TCU (2022–2025)

Passing WEPA0.64119343.6%
Pass 95.5% · Rush 7.7%

1st 35.7% · 2nd 38.1% · 3rd 71.0%

Standard downs 37.2% · Passing downs 61.2%

2022: 3★ · 0.8730
Lee Beebe · RB

CFBD athlete 5091725. UAB (2022–2024); Indiana (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.12810725.2%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 43.1%

1st 27.0% · 2nd 30.3% · 3rd 12.9%

Standard downs 27.8% · Passing downs 17.8%

Not linked
Turbo Richard · RB

CFBD athlete 5146724. Indiana (2026–2026); Boston College (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.2169823.3%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 38.0%

1st 27.8% · 2nd 24.5% · 3rd 11.8%

Standard downs 25.6% · Passing downs 17.1%

2024: 3★ · 0.8550
Nicolas Radicic · PK

CFBD athlete 5078315. Indiana (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.78012—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: 3★ · 0.8211
Paddy McAteer · PK

CFBD athlete 5232716. Indiana (2026–2026); Troy (2024–2025)

Kicker PAAR-2.0003—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: stars unavailable
Andrew Barker · TE

CFBD athlete 5216524. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Brock Schott · TE

CFBD athlete 5142604. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 4.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Charlie Becker · WR

CFBD athlete 5146735. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.5%
Pass 32.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 11.7% · 2nd 12.3% · 3rd 20.4%

Standard downs 11.4% · Passing downs 19.4%

Not linked
Davion Chandler · WR

CFBD athlete 5205460. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 8.8% · Rush 0.4%

1st 1.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 10.1%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Grant Wilson · QB

CFBD athlete 4695867. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 6.8% · Rush 2.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
Jackson Wasserstrom · WR

CFBD athlete 5104817. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Jayreon Campbell · RB

CFBD athlete 5214648. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.6%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Nick Marsh · WR

CFBD athlete 5079600. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.6%
Pass 25.4% · Rush 0.4%

1st 8.7% · 2nd 10.3% · 3rd 14.0%

Standard downs 9.4% · Passing downs 14.0%

Not linked
Sean Cuono · RB

CFBD athlete 5164320. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 10.7%

1st 6.9% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 6.6% · Passing downs 6.4%

Not linked
Shazz Preston · WR

CFBD athlete 4685516. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 9.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 7.2%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Trevor Gibbs · TE

CFBD athlete 5276970. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Tyler Cherry · QB

CFBD athlete 5145553. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 17.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 9.5%

Not linked
Tyler Morris · WR

CFBD athlete 4685464. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 9.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 4.7%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 17 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
A.J. Harris · CBPenn State2026-01-124★ / 0.9100Immediate
Billy Gowers · PHawai'i2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Brock Schott · TEMiami2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Carson Williams · CBMontana State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Chiddi Obiazor · EDGEKansas State2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Drew Clausen · LSIowa State2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Jiquan Sanks · SCincinnati2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joe Brunner · IOLWisconsin2026-01-144★ / 0.9300Immediate
Joe Hjelle · DLTulsa2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josh Hoover · QBTCU2026-01-044★ / 0.9300Immediate
Joshua Burnham · EDGENotre Dame2026-01-053★ / 0.8900Immediate
Nick Marsh · WRMichigan State2026-01-044★ / 0.9400Immediate
Paddy McAteer · KTroy2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Preston Zachman · SWisconsin2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Shazz Preston · WRTulane2026-01-123★ / 0.8900Immediate
Tobi Osunsanmi · EDGEKansas State2026-01-044★ / 0.9400Immediate
Turbo Richard · RBBoston College2026-01-043★ / 0.8800Immediate
Outgoing · 17 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ace Ciongoli · WRFlorida2026-01-213★ / 0.8000Immediate
Aden Cannon · EDGEIllinois State2026-01-18— / —Immediate
Alberto Mendoza · QBGeorgia Tech2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Amariyun Knighten · CBMiami (OH)2026-03-02— / —Immediate
Andrew DePaepe · EDGEMassachusetts2026-01-124★ / —Immediate
Bruno Massel IV · WRNot reported2026-01-22— / —Withdrawn
Dontrae Henderson · CBArkansas State2026-01-202★ / 0.7900Immediate
Evan Lawrence · OTSan Diego State2026-01-213★ / 0.8700Immediate
Finn Walters · EDGENot reported2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Hosea Wheeler · DLBaylor2026-01-224★ / 0.9200Immediate
J'mari Monette · DLMemphis2026-01-233★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jackson Wasserstrom · WRNot reported2026-01-15— / —Withdrawn
Jah Jah Boyd · SColorado2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Makai Jackson · WRLiberty2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mitch Verstegen · IOLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Triston Abram · EDGENot reported2026-07-29— / —Immediate
William DePaepe · EDGEMassachusetts2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Indiana. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Curt Cignetti · career 46–6 across 5 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 24 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Curt Cignetti · active at capture

    27–2 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-11-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2016–2023 · Tom Allen

    33–49 · 82 attributed games · 8 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2016-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2011–2016 · Kevin Wilson

    26–47 · 73 attributed games · 6 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2010-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2007–2010 · Bill Lynch

    19–30 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2007-06-15. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2005–2006 · Terry Hoeppner

    9–14 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2002–2004 · Gerry DiNardo

    8–27 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2002-01-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1997–2001 · Cam Cameron

    18–37 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1984–1996 · Bill Mallory

    68–78–3 · 149 attributed games · 13 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1983–1983 · Sam Wyche

    3–8 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1973–1982 · Lee Corso

    41–68–2 · 111 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1965–1972 · John Pont

    31–51–1 · 83 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1958–1964 · Phil Dickens

    20–41–2 · 63 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1957–1957 · Bob Hicks

    1–8 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1952–1956 · Bernie Crimmins

    13–32 · 45 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1948–1951 · Clyde Smith

    8–27–1 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1934–1947 · Bo McMillin

    63–48–11 · 122 attributed games · 14 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1931–1933 · Billy Hayes

    6–14–4 · 24 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1926–1930 · Pat Page

    14–24–3 · 41 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1923–1925 · William Ingram

    10–12–1 · 23 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1922–1922 · James Herron

    1–4–2 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1916–1921 · Jumbo Stiehm

    20–18–1 · 39 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1914–1915 · Clarence Childs

    6–7–1 · 14 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1905–1913 · James Sheldon

    34–26–3 · 63 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1899–1904 · James Horne

    30–20–3 · 53 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Curt Cignetti · incomplete attribution0–0——23.619.729—
2025 · Curt Cignetti16–09–03–032.427.3471
2024 · Curt Cignetti11–28–10–120.117.76510
2023 · Tom Allen3–91–80–0-7.4-3.569—
2022 · Tom Allen4–82–70–0-7.1-3.526—
2021 · Tom Allen2–100–90–0-7.8-6.954—
2020 · Tom Allen6–26–10–111.213.25812
2019 · Tom Allen8–55–40–112.86.836—
2018 · Tom Allen5–72–70–01.61.550—
2017 · Tom Allen5–72–70–010.2662—
2016 · Tom Allen · incomplete attribution0–1——4.6153—
2016 · Kevin Wilson · incomplete attribution6–6——4.6153—
2015 · Kevin Wilson6–72–60–10.42.253—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:13:16 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play12 / 13892.012 / 13892.0
Success rate45 / 13867.93 / 13898.5
Explosiveness10 / 13893.4123 / 13810.9
Standard-down success55 / 13860.61 / 138100.0
Passing-down successT45 / 13867.550 / 13864.2
Pass PPA5 / 13897.121 / 13885.4
Rush PPA44 / 13868.612 / 13892.0
Pass explosiveness5 / 13897.195 / 13831.4
Rush explosiveness67 / 13851.8104 / 13824.8
Line yards26 / 13881.84 / 13897.8
Second-level yards44 / 13868.69 / 13894.2
Open-field yards16 / 13889.120 / 13886.1
Stuff rate22 / 13884.714 / 13890.5
Power success117 / 13815.34 / 13897.8
HavocT20 / 13885.8T13 / 13890.5
Front-seven havocT31 / 13877.76 / 13896.4
DB havocT26 / 13880.7T92 / 13832.1
Points / opportunity27 / 13881.020 / 13886.1
Average field position43 / 13869.3T27 / 13880.3
Field-position expected pointsT37 / 13873.420 / 13886.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Josh Hoover · QBUsage 43.6% · Avg PPA 0.484 · Total 103.007
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.484103.00743.6%
Pass0.51698.98195.5%
Rush0.1924.0257.7%
1st down0.53944.21735.7%
2nd down0.19711.60438.1%
3rd down0.72948.08771.0%
Standard downs0.46362.02037.2%
Passing downs0.51940.98761.2%
Lee Beebe · RBUsage 25.2% · Avg PPA 0.079 · Total 9.736
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0799.73625.2%
Pass-0.608-3.0412.5%
Rush0.10812.77743.1%
1st down0.0674.16627.0%
2nd down0.0723.37130.3%
3rd down0.0000.00112.9%
Standard downs0.0747.44827.8%
Passing downs0.0992.28817.8%
Turbo Richard · RBUsage 23.3% · Avg PPA 0.188 · Total 21.427
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.18821.42723.3%
Pass-0.082-0.8215.0%
Rush0.21422.24838.0%
1st down0.30919.76127.8%
2nd down0.0923.49824.5%
3rd down0.2172.39011.8%
Standard downs0.19718.16225.6%
Passing downs0.1483.26517.1%
Charlie Becker · WRUsage 13.5% · Avg PPA 0.845 · Total 55.741
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.84555.74113.5%
Pass0.84555.74132.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.64817.49311.7%
2nd down0.90717.23912.3%
3rd down0.97218.46020.4%
Standard downs0.57423.54411.4%
Passing downs1.28832.19819.4%
Nick Marsh · WRUsage 10.6% · Avg PPA 0.651 · Total 33.874
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65133.87410.6%
Pass0.65033.12725.4%
Rush0.7470.7470.4%
1st down1.33826.7688.7%
2nd down-0.278-4.45110.3%
3rd down1.07213.93114.0%
Standard downs0.73024.8179.4%
Passing downs0.5039.05714.0%
Sean Cuono · RBUsage 6.5% · Avg PPA -0.105 · Total -1.364
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.105-1.3646.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.105-1.36410.7%
1st down-0.051-0.3596.9%
2nd down-0.105-0.4196.3%
3rd down-0.293-0.5866.7%
Standard downs-0.219-2.1946.6%
Passing downs0.2770.8316.4%
Tyler Cherry · QBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -1.349 · Total -4.046
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.349-4.0464.8%
Pass-1.349-4.04617.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.058-1.0585.0%
3rd down1.0361.03610.0%
Standard downs-4.023-4.0232.4%
Passing downs-0.011-0.0229.5%
Jayreon Campbell · RBUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.386 · Total 3.089
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3863.0894.0%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3863.0896.6%
1st down0.3451.0343.0%
2nd down-0.131-0.3924.7%
3rd down0.2640.2643.3%
Standard downs0.4752.8513.9%
Passing downs0.1190.2384.3%
Davion Chandler · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.384 · Total 6.527
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3846.5273.9%
Pass0.64910.3858.8%
Rush-3.858-3.8580.4%
1st down1.1782.3561.0%
2nd down-0.800-3.9993.7%
3rd down1.0458.36010.1%
Standard downs0.95310.4793.5%
Passing downs-0.659-3.9535.1%
Shazz Preston · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.568 · Total 8.527
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5688.5273.9%
Pass0.5688.5279.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9095.4513.2%
2nd down0.7923.1683.3%
3rd down-0.019-0.0937.2%
Standard downs0.9599.5933.5%
Passing downs-0.213-1.0665.0%
Tyler Morris · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.105 · Total 1.988
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1051.9883.9%
Pass0.1051.9889.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.161-1.4533.9%
2nd down-0.228-0.9112.6%
3rd down0.7254.3526.5%
Standard downs0.0760.9903.6%
Passing downs0.1660.9984.7%
Grant Wilson · QBUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA 1.099 · Total 9.895
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0999.8953.7%
Pass0.9585.7486.8%
Rush1.3824.1472.0%
1st down2.0188.0703.3%
2nd down0.3881.1653.8%
3rd down0.3300.6605.3%
Standard downs1.82712.7863.8%
Passing downs-1.445-2.8913.2%
Trevor Gibbs · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.353 · Total 1.413
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3531.4132.1%
Pass0.3531.4134.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5411.6223.4%
2nd down-0.209-0.2091.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5411.6222.2%
Passing downs-0.209-0.2091.9%
Brock Schott · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 2.210 · Total 6.631
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.2106.6311.7%
Pass2.2106.6314.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0121.0121.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down2.8105.6205.3%
Standard downs1.5193.0371.6%
Passing downs3.5943.5942.0%
Jackson Wasserstrom · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.036 · Total 1.036
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0361.0361.6%
Pass1.0361.0365.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.0361.03610.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.0361.0364.8%
Andrew Barker · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.047 · Total 0.047
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0470.0471.4%
Pass0.0470.0473.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.0470.0475.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.0470.0476.3%
Where Indiana sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.296 (92nd percentile; 138 teams)92ndOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.458 (68th percentile; 138 teams)68thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.353 (93rd percentile; 138 teams)93rdOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.501 (97th percentile; 138 teams)97thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.149 (68th percentile; 138 teams)68thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.064 (92nd percentile; 138 teams)92ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.327 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.358 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.196 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91st
Values and percentiles
Indiana metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.29692nd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.45868th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.35393rd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.50197th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.14968th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.06492nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.32799th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.35811th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.19691st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 195 attempts charted. Average depth of target 11.4 yards (96th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.2 per completion. Completion 62.1%, 9.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.55.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense62.7%55.9%+6.8177 / 195
Defense allowed61.4%60.0%+1.4215 / 237

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Indiana.

Target mix by zone, Indiana offense
Short left32% · 62Short middle17% · 32Short right33% · 64Deep left4% · 8Deep middle6% · 11Deep right8% · 16

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Indiana passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense195100%11.45.262.1%0.55+6.8 pp177
Passing defense23799%8.64.359.9%0.17+1.4 pp215

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2825.544.2%0.203.401.201.7013.4%64.9%
Defense allowed2722.329.8%-0.122.300.700.4022.3%53.1%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense276 / 282274811221269 / 269 · 100.0%
Defense allowed266 / 2722581426340242 / 242 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +6.8 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-13.79.532.8W1W1 vs North Texas: +32.8 ppW2W3W3 vs Western Kentucky: +15.3 ppW4W4 vs Northwestern: +7.7 ppW5W5 vs Rutgers: +16.7 ppW6W6 vs Nebraska: -2.7 ppW7W7 vs Ohio State: -1.5 ppW8W8 vs Michigan: -13.7 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1North Texas161586.7%53.9%+32.8 pp7.31.64304.50.13
W2Howard160———15.61.04467.10.41
W3Western Kentucky252475.0%59.7%+15.3 pp9.70.65415.70.22
W4Northwestern292965.5%57.8%+7.7 pp10.80.34406.80.29
W5Rutgers292972.4%55.7%+16.7 pp10.30.68398.40.47
W6Nebraska222254.5%57.2%-2.7 pp11.60.68223.0-0.14
W7Ohio State404050.0%51.5%-1.5 pp14.40.27292.5-0.16
W8Michigan181844.4%58.2%-13.7 pp9.5-0.33353.70.05

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

27 punts · 40.2 gross yards/punt · 37.4 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 27/27 punts. Known net yards: 24/27 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 11.4 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

2 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Michigan745.137.86/7
Week 7 · Ohio State442.337.73/4
Week 6 · Nebraska635.234.86/6
Week 5 · Rutgers238.538.52/2
Week 4 · Northwestern239.539.52/2
Team style
Rating history