Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Hawai'i

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Hawai'i's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 114 across 8 systems; best 88, worst 124, so they disagree by 36 places.

Lab EPA
#124
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#110
up 162026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#107
up 122026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#88
up 122026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#103
up 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#119
up 14 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#118
up 122026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#124
up 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#130 of 138
Schedule strength
#122 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#116 of 138
Game control
#130 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#112 of 138
Offense
#98 of 138
Defense
#117 of 138
Special teams
#56 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Hawai'i · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-6 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.131 net EPA/play

#124

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-7.39 points

#110 · Up 16 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -3.05 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.17, schedule #105 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth -9.22 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.03 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -7.39.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Hawai'i · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Stanford
away · 2026-08-29 · ID 401858201
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.76378.53%-7.74-0.639-0.660-1.299
Week 1 · UNLV
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401864497
-15.00 → -15.00-2.500.76378.53%-0.87-1.492-0.074-1.566
Week 2 · New Mexico State
home · 2026-09-13 · ID 401864578
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.79378.86%-6.780.665-0.6010.064
Week 4 · Wyoming
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864510
-17.00 → -17.00+2.500.85729.57%-8.25-1.388-0.789-2.177
Week 5 · San José State
home · 2026-10-04 · ID 401864513
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.89099.95%-8.63-0.646-0.859-1.505
Week 6 · Arizona State
away · 2026-10-11 · ID 401856808
-18.00 → -18.00+2.500.925910.34%-2.90-1.602-0.300-1.902
Week 7 · New Mexico
home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401864521
-11.00 → -11.00-2.500.962210.74%+8.10-1.4500.871-0.580
Week 8 · Northern Illinois
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401864526
+35.00 → +35.00+2.501.000011.16%-21.354.186-2.3831.803

Game terms -7.16 points; prior term -0.23 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -7.39 points. The preseason prior is -1.03 with 22.33% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-9.6 SP+ points

#107 · Up 12 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-13.30 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#119 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -6.53 on 550 plays; defense 6.77 on 475 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Hawai'i 14 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
2-6 · conf 1-4 · home 1-3 · away 1-3 · expected wins 2.1
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (-0.3 avg) · 2025: 9-4 ATS (+3.7 avg)
Head coach
Timmy Chang · hired 2022-01-22 · 19-19 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #116 (138 pts) · 2025 #124 (102 pts) · 2026 #124 (161 pts)
Returning
65% of production · 58% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing91%79%
Receiving52%45%
Rushing21%43%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back62.670.82184.93
Defensive Line92.890.81867.37
Linebacker93.000.82457.42
Offensive Line103.000.82148.21
Quarterback43.000.83953.36
Receiver132.770.819710.66
Special Teams82.880.82796.62

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Micah Alejado · QB

CFBD athlete 5101124. Hawai'i (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.21036065.4%
Pass 97.0% · Rush 12.3%

1st 59.3% · 2nd 65.5% · 3rd 80.6%

Standard downs 59.9% · Passing downs 75.4%

2024: 3★ · 0.8467
Devon Rice · RB

CFBD athlete 5079651. Hawai'i (2026–2026); Kansas State (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.2018818.1%
Pass 6.1% · Rush 40.4%

1st 24.7% · 2nd 18.0% · 3rd 7.0%

Standard downs 22.2% · Passing downs 10.6%

2024: 3★ · 0.8633
Cam Barfield · RB

CFBD athlete 4869582. Hawai'i (2024–2026); Boston College (2022–2023)

Rushing WEPA0.0684513.8%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 29.7%

1st 14.4% · 2nd 16.9% · 3rd 8.7%

Standard downs 16.1% · Passing downs 9.7%

2022: 3★ · 0.8589
Sean Olvera-Harle · PK

CFBD athlete 5295256. Hawai'i (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.63016—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Audric Harris · WR

CFBD athlete 5079499. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 10.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 7.5% · 3rd 9.5%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Bjorn Jurgensen · QB

CFBD athlete 5211117. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 1.8%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 3.9% · 3rd 5.4%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 6.0%

Not linked
Blaze Kamoku · WR

CFBD athlete 5218880. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.3% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 5.8%

Not linked
Carson Brown · WR

CFBD athlete 5081863. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Devin Alves · WR

CFBD athlete 4917119. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.9%
Pass 9.2% · Rush 0.6%

1st 7.2% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 7.2% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Devon Tauaefa · TE

CFBD athlete 4819259. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Frank Abreu · TE

CFBD athlete 5173623. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Josiah Fetui · WR

CFBD athlete 5218882. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 3.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.9% · 2nd 1.2% · 3rd 7.3%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Kainoa Carvalho · WR

CFBD athlete 5085972. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.3%
Pass 14.6% · Rush 0.5%

1st 9.9% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 10.9%

Standard downs 9.9% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Koa Eldredge · WR

CFBD athlete 5150635. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Nick Delgadillo · WR

CFBD athlete 5158917. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 7.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.8% · 2nd 8.4% · 3rd 3.1%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 7.0%

Not linked
Sitani Mikaele · RB

CFBD athlete 5218869. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.2%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 13.3%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 6.2%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 7.2%

Not linked
TJ Fo'ilefutu · RB

CFBD athlete 5291002. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 1.1% · Rush 8.2%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
Tama Uiliata · WR

CFBD athlete 5218881. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.8%
Pass 13.8% · Rush 3.4%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 15.5%

Standard downs 8.8% · Passing downs 11.6%

Not linked
Titan Lacaden · WR

CFBD athlete 5148777. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.5%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 3.9%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked
Tre Griffiths · WR

CFBD athlete 5146748. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 5.1%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 16 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Tomczyk · EDGEWest Virginia2026-01-293★ / 0.8400Immediate
Audric Harris · WRWashington2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Bjorn Jurgensen · QBVirginia2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Caleb Brown · CBVirginia Tech2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Carson Brown · WRIowa State2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
DeVon Rice · RBKansas State2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Devin Alves · WRVirginia Tech2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Geoffrey Speight Jr. · DLWest Georgia2026-01-233★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jeremiah Hughes · CBMichigan State2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Joenel Figueroa · SWest Georgia2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Khalil Walker · IOLSouth Florida2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kodi DeCambra · SUNLV2026-01-074★ / —Immediate
Lipe Moala · IOLOregon2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ozzy Pollard · DLNot reported2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Spencer Elliott · EDGEPortland State2026-01-112★ / —Immediate
Tre' Griffiths · WROklahoma State2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 9 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Billy Gowers · PIndiana2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Brandon White · WRKansas State2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Deliyon Freeman · CBNot reported2025-12-152★ / —Immediate
Dermaricus Davis · QBCal Poly2026-01-274★ / —Immediate
Jackson Harris · WRLSU2026-01-043★ / 0.8900Immediate
Joey Farthing · WRNot reported2025-12-282★ / —Immediate
Luke Weaver · QBSan José State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Semaj James · SNot reported2025-12-30— / —Immediate
Tim Malo · SNot reported2026-01-083★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Hawai'i. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Timmy Chang · career 22–29 across 5 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 12 appointments
  1. 2022–present · Timmy Chang · active at capture

    22–29 · 51 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2022-01-22. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2020–2021 · Todd Graham

    11–11 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2020-01-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2016–2019 · Nick Rolovich

    28–27 · 55 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2015-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2015–2015 · Chris Naeole

    1–3 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2015-11-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2012–2015 · Norm Chow

    10–36 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-12-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2008–2011 · Greg McMackin

    29–25 · 53 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2008-01-15. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1999–2007 · June Jones

    76–41 · 117 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1996–1998 · Fred Vonappen

    5–31 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1987–1995 · Bob Wagner

    58–49–3 · 110 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1977–1986 · Dick Tomey

    63–46–3 · 112 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1974–1976 · Larry Price

    15–18 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1971–1971 · Dave Holmes

    7–4 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Timmy Chang · incomplete attribution0–0——-12.6-13.6124—
2025 · Timmy Chang9–45–31–01.7-3.3124—
2024 · Timmy Chang5–73–40–0-10.9-12.9116—
2023 · Timmy Chang5–83–50–0-16.4-12.7117—
2022 · Timmy Chang3–102–60–0-24.7-18.4126—
2021 · Todd Graham6–73–50–0-2.3-7.8127—
2020 · Todd Graham5–44–41–0-7.1-3.3127—
2019 · Nick Rolovich10–55–41–0-1.9-2.3115—
2018 · Nick Rolovich8–65–30–1-10.4-10.196—
2017 · Nick Rolovich3–91–70–0-19.7-20.386—
2016 · Nick Rolovich7–74–41–0-10.1-11.4108—
2015 · Norm Chow · incomplete attribution2–7——-16.3-21.7122—
2015 · Chris Naeole · incomplete attribution1–3——-16.3-21.7122—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:25:10 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play106 / 13823.4115 / 13816.8
Success rate94 / 13832.1116 / 13816.1
Explosiveness118 / 13814.650 / 13864.2
Standard-down success74 / 13846.7111 / 13819.7
Passing-down success101 / 13827.0102 / 13826.3
Pass PPA104 / 13824.895 / 13831.4
Rush PPA109 / 13821.2107 / 13822.6
Pass explosiveness132 / 1384.432 / 13877.4
Rush explosiveness118 / 13814.680 / 13842.3
Line yards91 / 13834.3112 / 13819.0
Second-level yards93 / 13832.8109 / 13821.2
Open-field yards88 / 13836.596 / 13830.7
Stuff rate96 / 13830.7101 / 13827.0
Power success47 / 13866.462 / 13855.5
Havoc113 / 13818.2T110 / 13820.1
Front-seven havocT84 / 13837.2T103 / 13825.2
DB havoc125 / 1389.5T88 / 13835.4
Points / opportunity101 / 13827.0114 / 13817.5
Average field positionT107 / 13821.5T27 / 13880.3
Field-position expected pointsT115 / 13816.435 / 13875.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Micah Alejado · QBUsage 65.4% · Avg PPA 0.076 · Total 28.916
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07628.91665.4%
Pass0.11139.12197.0%
Rush0.1333.33512.3%
1st down0.0223.13259.3%
2nd down0.0101.30665.5%
3rd down0.35837.20080.6%
Standard downs0.0409.02159.9%
Passing downs0.12819.89575.4%
Devon Rice · RBUsage 18.1% · Avg PPA 0.056 · Total 5.898
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0565.89818.1%
Pass-0.347-7.6326.1%
Rush0.17214.08840.4%
1st down-0.069-4.15524.7%
2nd down0.2759.62218.0%
3rd down0.5174.6537.0%
Standard downs0.0070.59522.2%
Passing downs0.2415.30210.6%
Cam Barfield · RBUsage 13.8% · Avg PPA -0.012 · Total -0.696
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.012-0.69613.8%
Pass0.2223.3365.6%
Rush-0.092-4.03229.7%
1st down-0.172-4.48014.4%
2nd down-0.020-0.49216.9%
3rd down1.0638.5028.7%
Standard downs-0.102-4.48516.1%
Passing downs0.2533.7889.7%
Tama Uiliata · WRUsage 9.8% · Avg PPA 0.557 · Total 31.731
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.55731.7319.8%
Pass0.48224.11513.8%
Rush1.0887.6163.4%
1st down0.0220.3967.4%
2nd down0.2493.2346.7%
3rd down0.73414.67615.5%
Standard downs0.63120.8128.8%
Passing downs0.45510.91811.6%
Kainoa Carvalho · WRUsage 9.3% · Avg PPA 0.265 · Total 14.337
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.26514.3379.3%
Pass0.24112.75314.6%
Rush1.5841.5840.5%
1st down0.3488.3579.9%
2nd down-0.071-1.0647.7%
3rd down0.74510.43410.9%
Standard downs0.30611.3089.9%
Passing downs0.1783.0298.2%
Audric Harris · WRUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.363 · Total 12.354
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.36312.3546.6%
Pass0.36312.35410.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4874.8694.7%
2nd down0.7379.5807.5%
3rd down-0.190-2.0959.5%
Standard downs0.80212.8364.8%
Passing downs-0.027-0.4829.7%
Sitani Mikaele · RBUsage 6.2% · Avg PPA -0.040 · Total -1.424
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.040-1.4246.2%
Pass0.3693.3172.5%
Rush-0.176-4.74113.3%
1st down-0.232-3.0165.3%
2nd down-0.091-1.0946.2%
3rd down0.3282.6226.2%
Standard downs0.000-0.0025.6%
Passing downs-0.095-1.4227.2%
Devin Alves · WRUsage 5.9% · Avg PPA 0.476 · Total 14.285
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47614.2855.9%
Pass0.43412.5779.2%
Rush1.7081.7080.6%
1st down0.4466.6887.2%
2nd down0.3905.0697.7%
3rd down1.2642.5281.8%
Standard downs0.3748.6047.2%
Passing downs0.8125.6813.8%
Titan Lacaden · WRUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA 0.453 · Total 12.670
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.45312.6704.8%
Pass0.46012.4127.5%
Rush0.2580.2580.5%
1st down0.4346.9386.6%
2nd down0.1801.2583.6%
3rd down0.8954.4743.9%
Standard downs0.3457.9246.1%
Passing downs0.9494.7472.4%
Nick Delgadillo · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.389 · Total -4.665
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.389-4.6654.2%
Pass-0.389-4.6657.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.074-1.0740.8%
2nd down-0.077-0.6178.4%
3rd down0.2660.5313.1%
Standard downs-0.199-0.9972.7%
Passing downs-0.524-3.6687.0%
Carson Brown · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.032 · Total 0.482
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0320.4824.1%
Pass0.0320.4826.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.011-0.0553.3%
2nd down-0.080-0.4805.0%
3rd down0.2541.0164.9%
Standard downs-0.048-0.4363.9%
Passing downs0.1530.9184.5%
TJ Fo'ilefutu · RBUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.455 · Total 2.728
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4552.7283.9%
Pass-0.703-0.7031.1%
Rush0.6863.4318.2%
1st down-0.060-0.1804.7%
2nd down0.0420.0844.0%
3rd down2.8242.8242.9%
Standard downs-0.060-0.1802.9%
Passing downs0.9692.9086.1%
Blaze Kamoku · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.197 · Total 2.756
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1972.7563.8%
Pass0.1972.7566.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.681-1.3621.3%
2nd down-0.005-0.0426.5%
3rd down1.0404.1604.5%
Standard downs0.0010.0042.5%
Passing downs0.3442.7525.8%
Bjorn Jurgensen · QBUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA -0.386 · Total -4.250
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.386-4.2503.6%
Pass-0.407-3.6624.8%
Rush-0.294-0.5881.8%
1st down-0.697-2.0922.5%
2nd down-0.178-0.7133.9%
3rd down-0.361-1.4465.4%
Standard downs-0.613-2.4512.1%
Passing downs-0.257-1.7996.0%
Devon Tauaefa · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.042 · Total 0.665
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0420.6653.2%
Pass0.0420.6655.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.016-0.1404.2%
2nd down-0.287-1.1462.4%
3rd down0.6501.9512.8%
Standard downs0.0510.6133.7%
Passing downs0.0130.0532.3%
Tre Griffiths · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.415 · Total -2.073
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.415-2.0733.2%
Pass-0.415-2.0735.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.799-1.5983.4%
2nd down0.2180.2181.9%
3rd down-0.347-0.6935.1%
Standard downs-0.653-1.9593.4%
Passing downs-0.057-0.1143.0%
Frank Abreu · TEUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.951 · Total 9.508
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9519.5082.8%
Pass0.9519.5084.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.2083.6232.0%
2nd down0.4712.8275.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.3376.6852.1%
Passing downs0.5652.8234.3%
Josiah Fetui · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 1.141 · Total 13.695
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.14113.6952.4%
Pass1.14113.6953.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.647-1.2940.9%
2nd down1.0622.1251.2%
3rd down1.60812.8647.3%
Standard downs-0.478-1.4350.9%
Passing downs1.68115.1304.9%
Koa Eldredge · WRUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.414 · Total -2.895
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.414-2.8951.9%
Pass-0.414-2.8953.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.039-0.1181.9%
2nd down-0.919-1.8381.6%
3rd down-0.470-0.9392.6%
Standard downs-0.391-1.9562.0%
Passing downs-0.470-0.9391.7%
Where Hawai'i sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.058 (23rd percentile; 138 teams)23rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.408 (32nd percentile; 138 teams)32ndOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.141 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.105 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.025 (21st percentile; 138 teams)21stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.175 (17th percentile; 138 teams)17thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.447 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.190 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.136 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20th
Values and percentiles
Hawai'i metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.05823rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40832nd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.14115th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.10525th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.02521st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.17517th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.44716th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.19064th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13620th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 350 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.4 yards (40th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.2 per completion. Completion 58.6%, 6.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.16.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense59.0%61.0%-2.1346 / 350
Defense allowed62.1%60.8%+1.3206 / 207

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Hawai'i.

Target mix by zone, Hawai'i offense
Short left39% · 134Short middle19% · 66Short right31% · 104Deep left5% · 16Deep middle3% · 11Deep right3% · 9

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Hawai'i passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense35099%8.44.258.6%0.16-2.1 pp346
Passing defense207100%9.34.962.3%0.30+1.3 pp206

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2193.346.4%0.103.101.000.5016.5%76.5%
Defense allowed2844.845.7%0.163.401.101.3012.8%72.2%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense216 / 219211820450193 / 194 · 99.5%
Defense allowed279 / 2842701410690263 / 265 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.1 pp. 8 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-20.8-5.010.9W1W1 vs Stanford: -4.3 ppW1W1 vs UNLV: -20.8 ppW2W2 vs New Mexico State: +10.9 ppW4W4 vs Wyoming: +1.9 ppW5W5 vs San José State: +7.1 ppW6W6 vs Arizona State: -11.8 ppW7W7 vs New Mexico: -1.0 ppW8W8 vs Northern Illinois: +6.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Stanford525259.6%63.9%-4.3 pp6.70.20212.20.20
W1UNLV444438.6%59.4%-20.8 pp8.8-0.02333.60.06
W2New Mexico State474772.3%61.5%+10.9 pp7.60.39262.7-0.09
W4Wyoming444463.6%61.7%+1.9 pp7.40.14234.40.27
W5San José State383565.7%58.6%+7.1 pp10.30.21253.8-0.11
W6Arizona State515151.0%62.8%-11.8 pp7.6-0.09222.90.11
W7New Mexico404057.5%58.5%-1.0 pp9.80.02271.6-0.10
W8Northern Illinois343366.7%60.2%+6.5 pp11.00.53424.20.34

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

38 punts · 43.6 gross yards/punt · 37.8 net yards/punt

10 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 38/38 punts. Known net yards: 26/38 punts.

Our punt returns

9 returns · 5.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 9/9 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Northern Illinois345.041.02/3
Week 7 · New Mexico637.832.34/6
Week 6 · Arizona State551.430.02/5
Week 5 · San José State340.730.52/3
Week 4 · Wyoming343.335.02/3
Team style
Rating history