Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Georgia

2026 season

SEC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Georgia's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 6 across 8 systems; best 2, worst 10, so they disagree by 8 places.

Lab EPA
#10
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#7
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#2
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#4
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#4
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#6
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#6
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#10
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#10 of 138
Schedule strength
#34 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#26 of 138
Game control
#3 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#3 of 138
Offense
#1 of 138
Defense
#20 of 138
Special teams
#33 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Georgia · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.172 net EPA/play

#10

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

15.97 points

#7 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +19.37 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -0.47, schedule #50 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +3.10. That is worth +18.90 on its own; the preseason prior of +7.15 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +15.97.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Georgia · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Tennessee State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856658
+60.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.52%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.095-2.3810.714
Week 2 · Western Kentucky
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856673
+50.00 → +35.00-2.500.79379.90%-7.943.217-0.7862.431
Week 3 · Arkansas
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856686
+28.00 → +28.00+2.500.824910.29%-2.103.138-0.2162.921
Week 4 · Oklahoma
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856700
+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.857210.69%+6.472.7260.6923.418
Week 5 · Vanderbilt
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401856705
+24.00 → +24.00-2.500.890911.11%-4.452.389-0.4951.894
Week 6 · Alabama
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856712
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.925911.55%+18.660.6352.1552.790
Week 7 · Auburn
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856719
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.962212.00%+5.67-0.6600.6810.021

Game terms +14.19 points; prior term +1.78 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +15.97 points. The preseason prior is +7.15 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.3 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

27.1 SP+ points

#2 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

22.47 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#6 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 14.52 on 296 plays; defense -7.95 on 299 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Georgia 3 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-1 · conf 4-1 · home 4-1 · away 2-0 · expected wins 5.7
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #3 · Coaches Poll #3
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-2 ATS (+3.3 avg) · 2025: 6-8 ATS (-0.4 avg)
Head coach
Kirby Smart · hired 2015-12-06 · 36-6 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #1 (317 pts) · 2025 #2 (305 pts) · 2026 #6 (292 pts)
Returning
69% of production · 74% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing100%99%
Receiving35%33%
Rushing99%83%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back194.110.938117.82
Defensive Line234.040.938021.57
Linebacker114.270.944610.39
Offensive Line223.820.917420.18
Quarterback43.500.90123.60
Receiver224.000.934220.55
Running Back73.860.91936.43
Special Teams83.380.86276.90

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Gunner Stockton · QB

CFBD athlete 4685578. Georgia (2022–2026)

Passing WEPA0.61415843.5%
Pass 80.6% · Rush 11.7%

1st 38.1% · 2nd 42.9% · 3rd 59.0%

Standard downs 40.1% · Passing downs 53.0%

2022: 4★ · 0.9506
Dwight Phillips Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5079561. Georgia (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2964613.4%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 21.2%

1st 18.3% · 2nd 12.9% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 14.8% · Passing downs 9.6%

2024: 4★ · 0.9147
Chauncey Bowens · RB

CFBD athlete 5079335. Georgia (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2163714.5%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 22.0%

1st 14.2% · 2nd 13.0% · 3rd 18.9%

Standard downs 16.0% · Passing downs 9.6%

2024: 4★ · 0.9174
Nate Frazier · RB

CFBD athlete 5084047. Georgia (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1713312.3%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 22.0%

1st 12.0% · 2nd 16.5% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 11.7% · Passing downs 14.5%

2024: 4★ · 0.9777
Peyton Woodring · PK

CFBD athlete 5077226. Georgia (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR2.9709—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: 3★ · 0.8333
Bo Walker · RB

CFBD athlete 5172095. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.7%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 12.6%

1st 10.1% · 2nd 7.9% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 8.3% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
CJ Wiley · WR

CFBD athlete 5141749. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Colton Heinrich · TE

CFBD athlete 5130409. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Craig Dandridge · WR

CFBD athlete 5263766. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 10.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.6% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 7.8%

Not linked
Dallas Dickerson · WR

CFBD athlete 5273767. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Elyiss Williams · TE

CFBD athlete 5141756. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 0.8% · 3rd 1.5%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Ethan Barbour · TE

CFBD athlete 5141371. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 1.0%

Not linked
Hezekiah Millender · QB

CFBD athlete 5229348. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 1.7% · Rush 4.9%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Isiah Canion · WR

CFBD athlete 5132253. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jaden Reddell · TE

CFBD athlete 5218582. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 7.2% · Rush 1.8%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 6.2%

Not linked
Jae Lamar · RB

CFBD athlete 5244758. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 9.8%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 5.1% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jeremy Bell · WR

CFBD athlete 5150831. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 1.5%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Kaiden Prothro · TE

CFBD athlete 5182804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Landon Roldan · WR

CFBD athlete 5215017. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 1.6%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 1.5%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
Lawson Luckie · TE

CFBD athlete 4870874. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
London Humphreys · WR

CFBD athlete 5078453. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.6%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 1.1%

Not linked
Nick Peal · RB

CFBD athlete 5446770. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.6%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 6.6% · 3rd 8.1%

Standard downs 7.4% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Ryan Montgomery · QB

CFBD athlete 5141602. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 1.6%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 5.1% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Ryan Mosley · WR

CFBD athlete 5212652. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Ryan Puglisi · QB

CFBD athlete 5079679. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.0%
Pass 17.3% · Rush 1.6%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 12.3%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 13.0%

Not linked
Sacovie White · WR

CFBD athlete 5105269. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 9.0% · Rush 0.9%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
Talyn Taylor · WR

CFBD athlete 5141671. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.2%
Pass 14.7% · Rush 0.5%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 8.4% · 3rd 10.4%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 11.1%

Not linked
Thomas Blackshear · WR

CFBD athlete 5149473. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 12.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 12.1%

Not linked
Tyler Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 5297763. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 9 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amaris Williams · EDGEAuburn2026-01-084★ / 0.9400Immediate
Braylon Conley · CBUSC2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bryson Beaver · QBOregon2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Dante Dowdell · RBKentucky2026-01-124★ / 0.9000Immediate
Gentry Williams · CBOklahoma2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Isiah Canion · WRGeorgia Tech2026-01-084★ / 0.9400Immediate
Ja'Marley Riddle · SEast Carolina2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Khalil Barnes · SClemson2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
TyQuez Richardson · OTAlabama A&M2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 17 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adrian Maddox · SKansas State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bo Hughley · OTColorado2026-01-123★ / 0.8800Immediate
Daniel Harris · CBCalifornia2026-01-163★ / 0.8800Immediate
Dominick Kelly · CBOhio State2026-01-144★ / 0.9000Immediate
Elo Modozie · EDGEPurdue2026-01-194★ / 0.9000Immediate
JaCorey Thomas · SWest Virginia2026-09-044★ / —Immediate
Jaden Harris · SKansas2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jamal Meriweather · OTMiami2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joenel Aguero · SOle Miss2026-01-103★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jordan Thomas · DLSouth Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kelton Smith Jr. · IOLGeorgia State2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kris Jones · LBBoston College2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Maurice Gleaton Jr. · WRArkansas2026-06-013★ / —Immediate
Nyier Daniels · OTNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate
Ondre Evans · CBNC State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Pearce Spurlin III · TEColorado State2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Rod Robinson II · RBUAB2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Georgia. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Kirby Smart · career 117–21 across 11 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 20 appointments
  1. 2016–present · Kirby Smart · active at capture

    117–21 · 138 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Hired 2015-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2001–2015 · Mark Richt

    145–51 · 196 attributed games · 15 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-26. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 1996–2000 · Jim Donnan

    40–19 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1989–1995 · Ray Goff

    46–34–1 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1964–1988 · Vince Dooley

    201–77–10 · 288 attributed games · 25 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1961–1963 · Johnny Griffith

    10–16–4 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1939–1960 · Wallace Butts

    140–86–9 · 235 attributed games · 22 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1938–1938 · Joel Hunt

    5–4–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1928–1937 · Harry Mehre

    59–34–6 · 99 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1923–1927 · George Woodruff

    30–16–1 · 47 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1920–1922 · Herman Stegeman

    20–6–3 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1919–1919 · W.A. Cunningham

    4–2–3 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1910–1916 · W.A. Cunningham

    39–16–6 · 61 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1909–1909 · James Coulter

    1–4–2 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1908–1908 · Branch Bocock

    5–2–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1906–1907 · W.S. Whitney

    6–7–2 · 15 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1905–1905 · Marvin Dickinson

    1–5 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1904–1904 · Charles Barnard

    1–5 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1903–1903 · Marvin Dickinson

    3–4 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1902–1902 · Billy Reynolds

    4–2–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Kirby Smart · incomplete attribution0–0——26.520.86—
2025 · Kirby Smart12–27–10–124.11626
2024 · Kirby Smart11–37–20–124.316.316
2023 · Kirby Smart13–18–11–031.220.724
2022 · Kirby Smart15–09–02–035.32731
2021 · Kirby Smart14–18–12–03227.931
2020 · Kirby Smart8–27–21–019.118.917
2019 · Kirby Smart12–27–21–026.821.724
2018 · Kirby Smart11–37–20–132.926.31—
2017 · Kirby Smart13–28–21–126.72732
2016 · Kirby Smart8–54–41–09.34.76—
2015 · Mark Richt · incomplete attribution9–3——16.810.36—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-23 16:44:55 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play2 / 13899.329 / 13879.6
Success rate2 / 13899.321 / 13885.4
Explosiveness47 / 13866.482 / 13840.9
Standard-down success3 / 13898.543 / 13869.3
Passing-down success12 / 13892.05 / 13897.1
Pass PPA2 / 13899.349 / 13865.0
Rush PPA9 / 13894.28 / 13894.9
Pass explosiveness73 / 13847.4105 / 13824.1
Rush explosiveness58 / 13858.418 / 13887.6
Line yards18 / 13887.622 / 13884.7
Second-level yards16 / 13889.17 / 13895.6
Open-field yards4 / 13897.870 / 13849.6
Stuff rate18 / 13887.687 / 13837.2
Power success9 / 13894.290 / 13835.0
HavocT20 / 13885.8T28 / 13879.9
Front-seven havocT27 / 13880.326 / 13881.8
DB havocT38 / 13872.3T54 / 13859.5
Points / opportunity1 / 138100.0T28 / 13879.9
Average field positionT34 / 13874.859 / 13857.7
Field-position expected points34 / 13875.937 / 13873.7

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Gunner Stockton · QBUsage 43.5% · Avg PPA 0.488 · Total 93.162
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48893.16243.5%
Pass0.59696.51780.6%
Rush0.3849.97211.7%
1st down0.20617.06838.1%
2nd down0.52731.60042.9%
3rd down0.92642.59759.0%
Standard downs0.45559.20240.1%
Passing downs0.55733.96053.0%
Chauncey Bowens · RBUsage 14.5% · Avg PPA 0.315 · Total 14.194
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.31514.19414.5%
Pass1.19711.9657.1%
Rush0.0642.22922.0%
1st down0.2936.43914.2%
2nd down0.3043.95113.0%
3rd down0.3803.80418.9%
Standard downs0.2047.74316.0%
Passing downs0.9226.4519.6%
Dwight Phillips Jr. · RBUsage 13.4% · Avg PPA 0.336 · Total 19.853
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.33619.85313.4%
Pass0.6007.1956.0%
Rush0.26912.65821.2%
1st down0.35814.32318.3%
2nd down0.2554.59012.9%
3rd down0.9390.9391.3%
Standard downs0.34516.54214.8%
Passing downs0.3013.3109.6%
Nate Frazier · RBUsage 12.3% · Avg PPA 0.274 · Total 10.972
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.27410.97212.3%
Pass-0.218-1.0923.3%
Rush0.34512.06522.0%
1st down0.2565.11212.0%
2nd down0.3465.87916.5%
3rd down-0.006-0.0185.8%
Standard downs0.3389.79911.7%
Passing downs0.1071.17414.5%
Ryan Puglisi · QBUsage 9.0% · Avg PPA 0.560 · Total 19.045
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56019.0459.0%
Pass0.49315.28317.3%
Rush1.2543.7621.6%
1st down0.2443.4117.4%
2nd down1.04012.47810.0%
3rd down0.3943.15612.3%
Standard downs0.4409.6707.7%
Passing downs0.7819.37513.0%
Bo Walker · RBUsage 7.7% · Avg PPA 0.067 · Total 2.274
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0672.2747.7%
Pass-0.379-2.2763.0%
Rush0.1624.55012.6%
1st down0.0631.39310.1%
2nd down-0.106-1.1667.9%
3rd down2.0462.0461.3%
Standard downs0.1383.7218.3%
Passing downs-0.207-1.4476.1%
Talyn Taylor · WRUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA 0.841 · Total 22.700
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.84122.7007.2%
Pass0.83121.59414.7%
Rush1.1061.1060.5%
1st down0.5405.4035.4%
2nd down0.8088.0838.4%
3rd down1.3169.21410.4%
Standard downs0.68210.9055.8%
Passing downs1.07211.79511.1%
Nick Peal · RBUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.191 · Total 2.488
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1912.4886.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1912.48811.6%
1st down0.2101.2636.6%
2nd down-0.092-0.3686.6%
3rd down0.5311.5938.1%
Standard downs0.2642.6397.4%
Passing downs-0.050-0.1515.6%
Thomas Blackshear · WRUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.021 · Total 0.301
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0210.3015.6%
Pass0.0210.30112.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.285-1.4264.0%
2nd down-0.042-0.1705.0%
3rd down0.3791.89612.5%
Standard downs-0.077-0.5413.7%
Passing downs0.1200.84212.1%
Craig Dandridge · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.978 · Total 21.523
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.97821.5235.0%
Pass0.97821.52310.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9749.7404.6%
2nd down0.7952.3862.1%
3rd down1.0449.39811.5%
Standard downs1.23116.0024.0%
Passing downs0.6145.5227.8%
Jae Lamar · RBUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.149 · Total 0.891
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1490.8914.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1490.8919.8%
1st down0.7922.3774.7%
2nd down-0.567-1.1345.1%
3rd down-0.351-0.3515.3%
Standard downs0.1490.8916.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ryan Montgomery · QBUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA -0.144 · Total -0.864
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.144-0.8644.9%
Pass-0.191-0.9548.6%
Rush0.0890.0891.6%
1st down0.1930.3873.1%
2nd down-0.799-1.5985.1%
3rd down0.1730.34710.5%
Standard downs-0.456-2.2815.2%
Passing downs1.4161.4163.7%
London Humphreys · WRUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA 0.949 · Total 14.233
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.94914.2334.8%
Pass0.94713.2609.7%
Rush0.9730.9730.6%
1st down0.8867.9716.0%
2nd down0.7072.8264.0%
3rd down1.7173.4353.3%
Standard downs1.07114.9976.2%
Passing downs-0.765-0.7651.1%
Sacovie White · WRUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.734 · Total 14.671
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.73414.6714.6%
Pass0.80114.4249.0%
Rush0.1230.2470.9%
1st down0.5503.3022.8%
2nd down0.9093.6362.9%
3rd down0.7316.58011.5%
Standard downs0.83210.8124.0%
Passing downs0.5513.8596.1%
Jaden Reddell · TEUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 1.009 · Total 13.122
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.00913.1224.2%
Pass0.9859.8467.2%
Rush1.0923.2761.8%
1st down0.6373.8203.9%
2nd down1.9529.7585.0%
3rd down-0.228-0.4573.8%
Standard downs0.6234.9803.5%
Passing downs1.6288.1416.2%
Isiah Canion · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.092 · Total 0.459
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0920.4594.1%
Pass0.0920.4598.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3211.2856.3%
2nd down-0.826-0.8262.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0920.4595.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Hezekiah Millender · QBUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.838 · Total 3.351
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8383.3513.3%
Pass0.5950.5951.7%
Rush0.9192.7564.9%
1st down0.5950.5951.6%
2nd down0.1030.1032.6%
3rd down1.3262.65310.5%
Standard downs0.3490.6982.1%
Passing downs1.3262.6537.4%
Tyler Williams · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.373 · Total 1.493
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3731.4933.3%
Pass0.3731.4936.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.863-0.8631.6%
2nd down1.0191.0192.6%
3rd down0.6691.33710.5%
Standard downs0.0780.1562.1%
Passing downs0.6691.3377.4%
Lawson Luckie · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 1.187 · Total 14.246
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.18714.2463.2%
Pass1.18714.2467.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7202.1601.6%
2nd down1.0404.1603.3%
3rd down1.5857.9266.9%
Standard downs0.9576.6962.5%
Passing downs1.5107.5504.9%
Elyiss Williams · TEUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.559 · Total 5.029
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5595.0292.4%
Pass0.5595.0295.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8515.1073.2%
2nd down1.9001.9000.8%
3rd down1.3021.3021.5%
Standard downs1.0017.0072.6%
Passing downs-0.989-1.9792.0%
Landon Roldan · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.985 · Total 8.865
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9858.8652.4%
Pass0.8595.1533.4%
Rush1.2373.7111.6%
1st down1.4695.8762.1%
2nd down0.0720.2903.3%
3rd down2.6992.6991.5%
Standard downs1.1387.9682.5%
Passing downs0.4480.8972.2%
Ethan Barbour · TEUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.364 · Total 2.915
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3642.9152.2%
Pass0.3642.9154.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4432.2132.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.021-0.0422.9%
Standard downs0.5043.5262.6%
Passing downs-0.611-0.6111.0%
CJ Wiley · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.386 · Total -0.772
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.386-0.7721.6%
Pass-0.386-0.7723.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2980.2981.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-1.070-1.0705.3%
Standard downs-0.386-0.7722.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Colton Heinrich · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -1.392 · Total -1.392
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.392-1.3921.6%
Pass-1.392-1.3923.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.392-1.3925.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.392-1.3922.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Dallas Dickerson · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.595 · Total 0.595
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5950.5951.6%
Pass0.5950.5953.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5950.5952.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5950.5952.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jeremy Bell · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.952 · Total 3.904
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.9523.9041.6%
Pass2.0602.0601.8%
Rush1.8451.8451.5%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.9523.9045.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs2.0602.0601.0%
Passing downs1.8451.8453.6%
Kaiden Prothro · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.817 · Total 1.633
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8171.6331.6%
Pass0.8171.6333.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.5692.5691.6%
2nd down-0.935-0.9352.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.8171.6332.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ryan Mosley · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.663 · Total -0.663
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.663-0.6631.6%
Pass-0.663-0.6634.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.663-0.6635.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.663-0.6632.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Georgia sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.355 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.519 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.266 (66th percentile; 138 teams)66thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.559 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.240 (94th percentile; 138 teams)94thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.005 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.354 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.245 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.181 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80th
Values and percentiles
Georgia metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.35599th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.51999th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.26666th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.55999th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.24094th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.00580th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.35485th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.24541st138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.18180th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 196 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.3 yards (35th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 7.6 per completion. Completion 71.4%, 9.5 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.55.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense70.6%62.2%+8.3163 / 196
Defense allowed60.3%64.2%-3.9194 / 224

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Georgia.

Target mix by zone, Georgia offense
Short left31% · 59Short middle13% · 25Short right39% · 75Deep left5% · 9Deep middle5% · 10Deep right6% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Georgia passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense19699%8.37.671.4%0.55+8.3 pp163
Passing defense22498%7.34.559.8%0.20-3.9 pp194

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2316.051.6%0.293.601.302.309.9%83.9%
Defense allowed2273.134.6%-0.022.700.700.8016.1%81.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense229 / 23121714810100211 / 213 · 99.1%
Defense allowed219 / 227218921010200 / 205 · 97.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +8.3 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-2.810.423.6W1W2W2 vs Western Kentucky: -1.1 ppW3W3 vs Arkansas: +16.5 ppW4W4 vs Oklahoma: -2.8 ppW5W5 vs Vanderbilt: +13.4 ppW6W6 vs Alabama: +23.6 ppW7W7 vs Auburn: +4.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Tennessee State320———7.10.662710.10.77
W2Western Kentucky252564.0%65.2%-1.1 pp6.50.81356.80.35
W3Arkansas212181.0%64.5%+16.5 pp5.90.78426.00.47
W4Oklahoma272653.8%56.7%-2.8 pp12.40.04265.0-0.10
W5Vanderbilt323278.1%64.7%+13.4 pp7.00.75345.20.22
W6Alabama222281.8%58.3%+23.6 pp9.90.60395.40.17
W7Auburn373767.6%63.0%+4.5 pp9.00.31284.00.12

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

19 punts · 46.1 gross yards/punt · 38.9 net yards/punt

5 inside the 20 · 6 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 19/19 punts. Known net yards: 17/19 punts.

Our punt returns

14 returns · 8.2 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

3 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 14/14 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Auburn336.342.02/3
Week 6 · Alabama246.036.02/2
Week 5 · Vanderbilt244.040.01/2
Week 4 · Oklahoma550.042.05/5
Week 3 · Arkansas243.533.52/2
Team style
Rating history