Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Florida State

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Florida State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 51 across 8 systems; best 37, worst 81, so they disagree by 44 places.

Lab EPA
#63
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#37
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#54
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#48
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#37
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#81
up 8 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#44
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#63
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#58 of 138
Schedule strength
#6 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#57 of 138
Game control
#22 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#39 of 138
Offense
#16 of 138
Defense
#88 of 138
Special teams
#41 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Florida State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.019 net EPA/play

#63

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

6.69 points

#37 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +4.23 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +4.01, schedule #8 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +8.85. That is worth +8.24 on its own; the preseason prior of +2.07 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +6.69.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Florida State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · New Mexico State
home · 2026-08-29 · ID 401864570
+17.00 → +17.00-2.500.76379.56%-6.781.386-0.6480.738
Week 1 · SMU
home · 2026-09-07 · ID 401858212
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.76379.56%+7.81-0.5260.7470.221
Week 3 · Alabama
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856685
-14.00 → -14.00+2.500.824910.33%+18.66-1.1871.9270.740
Week 4 · Central Arkansas
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858237
+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.857210.73%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.629-2.683-0.054
Week 5 · Virginia
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858253
+31.00 → +31.00-2.500.890911.15%+2.493.1780.2783.457
Week 6 · Louisville
away · 2026-10-09 · ID 401858254
-24.00 → -24.00+2.500.925911.59%+9.17-2.4921.063-1.429
Week 7 · Miami
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858263
-8.00 → -1.00 (OT)+2.500.962212.05%+19.250.1812.3192.500

Game terms +6.17 points; prior term +0.52 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +6.69 points. The preseason prior is +2.07 with 25.04% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

5.8 SP+ points

#54 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-3.77 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#81 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 4.44 on 379 plays; defense 8.21 on 372 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Florida State 26 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-4 · conf 1-3 · home 3-1 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.3
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-3-1 ATS (-0.6 avg) · 2025: 5-7 ATS (-0.8 avg)
Head coach
Mike Norvell · hired 2019-12-07 · 20-18 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #12 (272 pts) · 2025 #19 (244 pts) · 2026 #16 (252 pts)
Returning
40% of production · 31% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing13%6%
Receiving65%55%
Rushing28%33%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.620.909811.83
Defensive Line173.590.899215.29
Linebacker103.200.88148.81
Offensive Line163.310.878514.06
Quarterback63.670.89785.39
Receiver163.690.907014.51
Running Back44.000.92753.71
Special Teams113.640.88769.76

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Ashton Daniels · QB

CFBD athlete 4838679. Auburn (2025–2025); Stanford (2022–2024); Florida State (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.40518555.6%
Pass 96.5% · Rush 23.5%

1st 48.8% · 2nd 52.1% · 3rd 76.4%

Standard downs 50.0% · Passing downs 69.5%

2022: 3★ · 0.8600
Ousmane Kromah · RB

CFBD athlete 5141560. Florida State (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.11010327.1%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 44.9%

1st 31.9% · 2nd 26.7% · 3rd 15.7%

Standard downs 31.0% · Passing downs 17.6%

2025: 4★ · 0.9622
Ashton Daniels · QB

CFBD athlete 4838679. Auburn (2025–2025); Stanford (2022–2024); Florida State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.5906655.6%
Pass 96.5% · Rush 23.5%

1st 48.8% · 2nd 52.1% · 3rd 76.4%

Standard downs 50.0% · Passing downs 69.5%

2022: 3★ · 0.8600
Gabe Panikowski · PK

CFBD athlete 5083549. Sacramento State (2022–2022); Florida State (2026–2026); Oklahoma State (2025–2025); Idaho State (2024–2024)

Kicker PAAR4.9206—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: stars unavailable
Amari Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 5372196. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 4.3%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Chase Loftin · TE

CFBD athlete 5164345. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Desirrio Riles · TE

CFBD athlete 5160086. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 3.9%

Not linked
Duce Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 4870922. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.2%
Pass 21.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.2% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 12.4%

Standard downs 8.9% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
Greyson Labiad · TE

CFBD athlete 5294076. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jasen Lopez · WR

CFBD athlete 5222974. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 0.7%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Jayvan Boggs · WR

CFBD athlete 5164350. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.2%
Pass 16.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.2% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 10.8%

Not linked
Kevin Sperry · QB

CFBD athlete 5141661. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 1.1%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 8.6%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Landen Thomas · TE

CFBD athlete 5079738. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Micahi Danzy · WR

CFBD athlete 5088153. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 12.6% · Rush 1.2%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 5.5% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Samuel Singleton · RB

CFBD athlete 4870955. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——14.5%
Pass 10.7% · Rush 18.0%

1st 11.8% · 2nd 20.0% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 12.9% · Passing downs 18.0%

Not linked
Teriq Mallory · WR

CFBD athlete 5209709. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 20.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Tre Wisner · RB

CFBD athlete 4871076. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.6%
Pass 8.7% · Rush 18.4%

1st 12.8% · 2nd 16.9% · 3rd 12.0%

Standard downs 12.9% · Passing downs 15.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 22 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ashton Daniels · QBAuburn2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bradyn Joiner · IOLPurdue2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
CJ Richard Jr. · SIllinois State2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Carter Jula · PUNLV2026-01-19— / —Immediate
Chimdia Nwaiwu · OTStephen F. Austin2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Chris Jones · LBSouthern Miss2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Conor McAneney · KQuincy2026-01-163★ / 0.8000Immediate
Daniel Hughes · PNew Mexico2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Dean DeNobile · QBLafayette2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Desirrio Riles · TEEast Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gabe Panikowski · KOklahoma State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Gemari Sands · RBFlorida Atlantic2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jordan Sanders · DLTexas State2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Karson Hobbs · CBNotre Dame2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Ma'Khi Jones · SDuke2026-01-123★ / 0.8700Immediate
Mikai Gbayor · LBNorth Carolina2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Nate Pabst · OTBowling Green2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nehemiah Chandler · CBSouth Alabama2026-01-033★ / 0.8600Immediate
Paul Bowling · IOLTroy2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Quintrevion Wisner · RBTexas2026-01-054★ / 0.9300Immediate
Rylan Kennedy · EDGETexas A&M2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Xavier Chaplin · OTAuburn2026-01-094★ / 0.9200Immediate
Outgoing · 44 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amaree Williams · EDGEMississippi State2026-01-093★ / 0.8800Immediate
Ashlynd Barker · SNot reported2025-12-284★ / 0.9300Immediate
Brock Glenn · QBWestern Kentucky2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brunno Reus · KMissouri2026-01-133★ / 0.8000Immediate
Cai Bates · CBWisconsin2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Camdon Frier · WRTarleton State2026-02-043★ / 0.8400Immediate
Darryll Desir · EDGENot reported2026-01-164★ / 0.9400Withdrawn
Earl Little Jr. · SOhio State2026-01-114★ / 0.9300Immediate
Edwin Joseph · SOle Miss2026-01-104★ / 0.9200Immediate
Elijah Moore · WRSyracuse2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gav Holman · LBMississippi State2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gavin Sawchuk · RBNorthwestern2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ja'Bril Rawls · CBNot reported2025-12-164★ / 0.9400Immediate
Ja'Elyne Matthews · OTMississippi State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaden Jones · EDGEMissouri2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jake Weinberg · KMiami2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
James Williams · EDGEOklahoma State2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jamorie Flagg · DLFlorida International2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jayden Parrish · LBMemphis2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jaylen King · QBMercer2026-02-043★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jaylin Lucas · RBTulane2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jayson Jenkins · EDGEMississippi State2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jayvan Boggs · WRNot reported2025-12-273★ / 0.8900Immediate
Josh Raymond · IOLGeorgia Southern2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justin Cryer · LBTexas2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
KJ Sampson · DLBoston College2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kam Davis · RBLiberty2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kevin Wynn · DLNot reported2026-01-144★ / —Withdrawn
L A Jessie Harrold · EDGEUCF2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Landen Thomas · TENot reported2025-12-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Lawayne McCoy · WRLouisville2026-01-114★ / 0.9200Immediate
Lucas Simmons · OTWisconsin2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Luke Douglas · TEApp State2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Mac Chiumento · PTexas2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Manasse Itete · IOLArkansas State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mandrell Desir · EDGENot reported2026-01-164★ / 0.9600Withdrawn
Mario Nash Jr. · OTMississippi State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Omar Graham Jr. · LBNot reported2025-12-164★ / 0.9100Immediate
Randy Pittman Jr. · TESMU2026-01-113★ / 0.8800Immediate
Shamar Arnoux · CBAuburn2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Thomas Castellanos · QBTexas Tech2026-08-213★ / —Immediate
Tye Hylton · OTLouisiana Tech2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyeland Coleman · DLArkansas State2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Willy Suarez · WRIndiana State2026-01-08— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Florida State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Mike Norvell · career 76–50 across 11 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 13 appointments
  1. 2020–present · Mike Norvell · active at capture

    38–34 · 72 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2019-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2019–2019 · Odell Haggins

    2–2 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2019 · Willie Taggart

    9–12 · 21 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2017–2017 · Odell Haggins

    2–0 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2010–2017 · Jimbo Fisher

    83–23 · 106 attributed games · 8 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2010-01-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1976–2009 · Bobby Bowden

    315–98–4 · 417 attributed games · 34 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1974–1975 · Darrell Mudra

    4–18 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1971–1973 · Larry Jones

    15–19 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1960–1970 · Bill Peterson

    62–42–11 · 115 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1959–1959 · Perry Moss

    4–6 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1953–1958 · Thomas Nugent

    34–28–1 · 63 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1948–1952 · Don Veller

    31–12–1 · 44 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1947–1947 · Ed Williamson

    0–5 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Mike Norvell · incomplete attribution0–0——4.96.716—
2025 · Mike Norvell5–72–60–07.28.419—
2024 · Mike Norvell2–101–70–0-3.2-6.712—
2023 · Mike Norvell13–19–00–119.419.6196
2022 · Mike Norvell10–35–31–013.214.12011
2021 · Mike Norvell5–74–50–07.6422—
2020 · Mike Norvell3–62–60–0-4.9—22—
2019 · Odell Haggins · incomplete attribution2–2——1.80.219—
2019 · Willie Taggart · incomplete attribution4–5——1.80.219—
2018 · Willie Taggart5–73–50–01.4-2.811—
2017 · Jimbo Fisher · incomplete attribution5–6——22.810.16—
2017 · Odell Haggins · incomplete attribution2–0——22.810.16—
2016 · Jimbo Fisher10–35–31–02417.538
2015 · Jimbo Fisher10–36–20–123.215.8314
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-19 18:20:04 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play43 / 13869.3116 / 13816.1
Success rate65 / 13853.391 / 13834.3
Explosiveness7 / 13895.6121 / 13812.4
Standard-down success105 / 13824.1108 / 13821.9
Passing-down success16 / 13889.175 / 13846.0
Pass PPA49 / 13865.097 / 13829.9
Rush PPA22 / 13884.7110 / 13820.4
Pass explosiveness3 / 13898.5112 / 13819.0
Rush explosiveness51 / 13863.5115 / 13816.8
Line yards17 / 13888.3115 / 13816.8
Second-level yards45 / 13867.999 / 13828.5
Open-field yards53 / 13862.0128 / 1387.3
Stuff rate10 / 13893.496 / 13830.7
Power success104 / 13824.8102 / 13826.3
HavocT49 / 13863.5T95 / 13830.7
Front-seven havocT40 / 13871.2T77 / 13843.8
DB havocT71 / 13848.2T88 / 13835.4
Points / opportunity26 / 13881.859 / 13857.7
Average field positionT87 / 13836.134 / 13875.9
Field-position expected pointsT82 / 13840.531 / 13878.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Ashton Daniels · QBUsage 55.6% · Avg PPA 0.323 · Total 81.931
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.32381.93155.6%
Pass0.29556.63496.5%
Rush0.71241.29823.5%
1st down-0.005-0.52748.8%
2nd down0.43833.30352.1%
3rd down0.70247.76776.4%
Standard downs0.08313.50150.0%
Passing downs0.75268.43169.5%
Ousmane Kromah · RBUsage 27.1% · Avg PPA 0.043 · Total 5.320
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0435.32027.1%
Pass0.1371.7876.5%
Rush0.0323.53344.9%
1st down0.0231.50831.9%
2nd down0.2439.46526.7%
3rd down0.7049.86115.7%
Standard downs-0.075-7.59431.0%
Passing downs0.56112.91417.6%
Samuel Singleton · RBUsage 14.5% · Avg PPA 0.483 · Total 13.997
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48313.99714.5%
Pass1.48913.40010.7%
Rush0.0300.59718.0%
1st down-0.344-3.44511.8%
2nd down0.1161.50220.0%
3rd down2.65715.93914.3%
Standard downs0.0751.35512.9%
Passing downs1.14912.64218.0%
Tre Wisner · RBUsage 13.6% · Avg PPA 0.153 · Total 8.111
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1538.11113.6%
Pass0.71510.7278.7%
Rush-0.069-2.61618.4%
1st down-0.322-7.40312.8%
2nd down0.58312.23816.9%
3rd down0.3643.27612.0%
Standard downs-0.144-5.19112.9%
Passing downs0.78213.30215.3%
Duce Robinson · WRUsage 9.2% · Avg PPA 0.412 · Total 17.291
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.41217.2919.2%
Pass0.41217.29121.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2864.8548.2%
2nd down0.5997.1878.2%
3rd down0.5796.37212.4%
Standard downs0.1133.2908.9%
Passing downs1.07714.0019.9%
Jayvan Boggs · WRUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA 0.724 · Total 20.270
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.72420.2707.2%
Pass0.72420.27016.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1852.4007.2%
2nd down1.46111.6846.5%
3rd down0.5213.1248.0%
Standard downs0.3285.2535.7%
Passing downs1.25115.01610.8%
Micahi Danzy · WRUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.597 · Total 16.710
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.59716.7106.1%
Pass0.60215.05912.6%
Rush0.5501.6511.2%
1st down0.78310.1766.3%
2nd down-0.123-0.9815.5%
3rd down0.9385.6306.7%
Standard downs0.62414.3507.1%
Passing downs0.4722.3603.8%
Kevin Sperry · QBUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA -0.219 · Total -1.534
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.219-1.5343.7%
Pass-0.229-1.3736.5%
Rush-0.161-0.1611.1%
1st down-1.530-3.0612.2%
2nd down-0.230-0.4603.3%
3rd down0.6631.9888.6%
Standard downs-0.375-1.8773.7%
Passing downs0.1720.3433.5%
Amari Thomas · RBUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA -0.145 · Total -0.579
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.145-0.5793.5%
Pass0.1020.1022.4%
Rush-0.227-0.6814.3%
1st down-0.332-0.6643.3%
2nd down0.0430.0855.4%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.332-0.6642.2%
Passing downs0.0430.0857.7%
Desirrio Riles · TEUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.195 · Total 1.557
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1951.5573.1%
Pass0.1951.5576.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4312.1554.3%
2nd down-0.194-0.3882.4%
3rd down-0.210-0.2102.0%
Standard downs0.4312.1552.8%
Passing downs-0.199-0.5983.9%
Landen Thomas · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.202 · Total 1.816
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2021.8162.6%
Pass0.2021.8165.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.048-0.1432.1%
2nd down-0.105-0.4183.7%
3rd down1.1892.3772.8%
Standard downs0.2601.5592.5%
Passing downs0.0860.2582.9%
Teriq Mallory · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.470 · Total -0.470
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.470-0.4702.0%
Pass-0.470-0.4705.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.470-0.47020.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.470-0.4707.7%
Jasen Lopez · WRUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA 0.338 · Total 1.690
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3381.6901.9%
Pass0.3981.5923.5%
Rush0.0980.0980.7%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.2220.4442.5%
3rd down2.7195.4384.3%
Standard downs-0.656-1.9671.6%
Passing downs1.8293.6572.9%
Chase Loftin · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 1.255 · Total 3.766
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2553.7661.4%
Pass1.2553.7662.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.2553.7666.8%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.2553.7664.8%
Greyson Labiad · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.413 · Total -0.413
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.413-0.4131.3%
Pass-0.413-0.4132.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.413-0.4134.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.413-0.4131.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Florida State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.196 (69th percentile; 138 teams)69thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.433 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.390 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.268 (65th percentile; 138 teams)65thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.199 (85th percentile; 138 teams)85thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.176 (16th percentile; 138 teams)16thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.423 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.345 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.145 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31st
Values and percentiles
Florida State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.19669th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.43353rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.39096th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.26865th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.19985th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.17616th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.42334th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.34512th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14531st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 88% of 186 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.0 yards (80th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 8.5 per completion. Completion 58.6%, 8.8 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.33.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense58.0%59.6%-1.6143 / 186
Defense allowed62.1%60.3%+1.8153 / 222

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Florida State.

Target mix by zone, Florida State offense
Short left17% · 26Short middle29% · 45Short right35% · 55Deep left7% · 11Deep middle2% · 3Deep right10% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Florida State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense18688%10.08.558.6%0.33-1.6 pp143
Passing defense22282%8.85.262.6%0.36+1.8 pp153

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2644.547.3%0.233.401.101.1010.4%67.7%
Defense allowed2594.943.6%0.173.301.101.8013.7%76.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense258 / 2642521217660200 / 241 · 83.0%
Defense allowed256 / 2592461317880203 / 234 · 86.8%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -1.6 pp. 5 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-5.20.15.3W1W1W1 vs New Mexico State: -0.6 ppW3W3 vs Alabama: +5.3 ppW4W5W5 vs Virginia: -1.8 ppW6W6 vs Louisville: -5.2 ppW7W7 vs Miami: -4.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1SMU230————0.36443.00.07
W1New Mexico State272763.0%63.5%-0.6 pp6.30.27395.60.46
W3Alabama292958.6%53.3%+5.3 pp14.70.31352.70.16
W4Central Arkansas200———9.50.61286.40.43
W5Virginia191963.2%65.0%-1.8 pp8.40.28466.10.53
W6Louisville383855.3%60.4%-5.2 pp8.2-0.00384.20.24
W7Miami303053.3%57.8%-4.5 pp12.70.63343.8-0.35

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

25 punts · 44.0 gross yards/punt · 39.1 net yards/punt

5 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 25/25 punts. Known net yards: 18/25 punts.

Our punt returns

12 returns · 10.3 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 12/12 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 7 · Miami443.338.52/4
Week 6 · Louisville540.033.04/5
Week 5 · Virginia547.235.33/5
Week 4 · Central Arkansas149.0—0/1
Week 3 · Alabama238.537.02/2
Team style
Rating history