Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Delaware

2026 season

Conference USA
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Delaware's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 113 across 8 systems; best 93, worst 117, so they disagree by 24 places.

Lab EPA
#117
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#102
up 152026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#117
up 32026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#93
up 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#107
up 132026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#116
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#110
up 112026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#117
up 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#112 of 138
Schedule strength
#116 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#125 of 138
Game control
#119 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#108 of 138
Offense
#101 of 138
Defense
#109 of 138
Special teams
#40 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Delaware · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.110 net EPA/play

#117

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-5.85 points

#102 · Up 15 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -0.02 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.42, schedule #112 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.76. That is worth -6.44 on its own; the preseason prior of -4.03 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -5.85.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Delaware · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Merrimack
home · 2026-09-03 · ID 401864424
+35.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.44%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.067-2.3590.708
Week 2 · Vanderbilt
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856684
-9.00 → -9.00+2.500.79379.81%-4.45-0.637-0.437-1.074
Week 3 · Coastal Carolina
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401869940
+8.00 → +8.00-2.500.824910.19%-6.060.561-0.617-0.057
Week 4 · Virginia
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858239
-39.00 → -35.00+2.500.857210.59%+2.49-3.4430.264-3.178
Week 5 · Liberty
home · 2026-10-02 · ID 401871050
-16.00 → -16.00-2.500.890911.01%+6.67-2.0370.734-1.302
Week 7 · Middle Tennessee
away · 2026-10-13 · ID 401871067
-3.00 → -3.00+2.500.962211.89%-8.22-0.059-0.977-1.036
Week 8 · Missouri State
home · 2026-10-20 · ID 401871069
+23.00 → +23.00-2.501.000012.36%-11.702.533-1.4451.088

Game terms -4.85 points; prior term -1.00 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -5.85 points. The preseason prior is -4.03 with 24.71% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-11.7 SP+ points

#117 · Up 3 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-12.34 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#116 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -2.54 on 331 plays; defense 9.80 on 346 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Delaware 15 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 1-3 · expected wins 3.8
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-3 ATS (+2.8 avg) · 2025: 5-8 ATS (-1.7 avg)
Head coach
Ryan Carty · hired 2021-12-10 · 7-6 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #155 (36 pts) · 2025 #137 (52 pts) · 2026 #115 (167 pts)
Returning
85% of production · 92% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing96%98%
Receiving77%80%
Rushing88%99%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back83.000.83406.67
Defensive Line53.000.83344.17
Linebacker43.000.82683.31
Offensive Line53.000.84164.21
Quarterback33.000.83772.51
Receiver43.000.84403.38
Running Back13.000.84000.84
Special Teams33.000.83562.51

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Nick Minicucci · QB

CFBD athlete 5153846. Delaware (2023–2026)

Passing WEPA0.28511048.0%
Pass 82.2% · Rush 8.9%

1st 47.0% · 2nd 46.5% · 3rd 53.2%

Standard downs 43.9% · Passing downs 56.5%

2023: stars unavailable
Jo'Nathan Silver · RB

CFBD athlete 5086952. Delaware (2022–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1156718.2%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 36.8%

1st 20.1% · 2nd 17.6% · 3rd 16.0%

Standard downs 21.7% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Tyler Bell · QB

CFBD athlete 5289314. Delaware (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.3725934.8%
Pass 49.5% · Rush 18.6%

1st 35.6% · 2nd 33.3% · 3rd 38.5%

Standard downs 31.9% · Passing downs 40.9%

Not linked
Tucker Smack · PK

CFBD athlete 5401933. Delaware (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-0.4908—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Braden Streeter · QB

CFBD athlete 5224762. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——16.2%
Pass 24.5% · Rush 4.6%

1st 11.6% · 2nd 14.5% · 3rd 26.8%

Standard downs 13.0% · Passing downs 21.4%

Not linked
Bryson Graves · WR

CFBD athlete 5157266. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.0%
Pass 12.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 11.3%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 8.5%

Not linked
Calvin Thomas · WR

CFBD athlete 5296341. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Da'Wain Lofton · WR

CFBD athlete 4680024. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 12.8% · Rush 0.4%

1st 7.1% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 7.5%

Standard downs 7.3% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
Donovan Lewis · WR

CFBD athlete 5153870. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.7%
Pass 14.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.8% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 7.5%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 10.2%

Not linked
EJ Archield Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5296312. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——36.5%
Pass 52.8% · Rush 16.7%

1st 33.3% · 2nd 44.4% · 3rd 42.9%

Standard downs 31.0% · Passing downs 47.6%

Not linked
Elijah Sessoms · TE

CFBD athlete 5086956. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 2.8%

Not linked
Greg Spiller · RB

CFBD athlete 5224766. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.7%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jackson Whitacre · TE

CFBD athlete 5224785. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jared Porter · RB

CFBD athlete 5296321. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 0.7% · Rush 8.6%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 5.1% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Josh Humes · TE

CFBD athlete 5295765. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 4.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 8.0%

Not linked
Kaderris Roberts · RB

CFBD athlete 4887640. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.3%
Pass 7.9% · Rush 16.2%

1st 12.1% · 2nd 13.5% · 3rd 6.6%

Standard downs 12.1% · Passing downs 9.6%

Not linked
Matt McKinley · WR

CFBD athlete 5224783. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Nakeem Powell · RB

CFBD athlete 5327494. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 12.3%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 5.9% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Nick Tyree · WR

CFBD athlete 5224772. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 6.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Riley Trujillo · QB

CFBD athlete 5079614. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.5%
Pass 14.3% · Rush 7.4%

1st 9.1% · 2nd 15.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 8.8% · Passing downs 13.0%

Not linked
Scott Moore · TE

CFBD athlete 5296328. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Sean Wilson · WR

CFBD athlete 5224764. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.5%
Pass 20.7% · Rush 0.4%

1st 12.6% · 2nd 11.2% · 3rd 9.4%

Standard downs 11.5% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Tae'Sean Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5302760. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 10.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 9.8% · 3rd 7.3%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 10.3%

Not linked
Ty Salazer · WR

CFBD athlete 5296313. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Viron Ellison Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5161800. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.9%
Pass 2.1% · Rush 15.8%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 6.6%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 13 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Bryson Graves · WRCoastal Carolina2026-01-213★ / 0.8400Immediate
Dylan Mann · DLTroy2026-01-223★ / 0.8000Immediate
George Mullins · SMichigan State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jack Small · OTDuke2026-01-233★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jalen Bell · SNot reported2026-01-10— / —Immediate
James Steel · DLUAB2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jaquise Alexander · CBNorth Dakota State2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Josh Humes · TECoastal Carolina2026-01-222★ / 0.7900Immediate
Kaderris Roberts · RBBowling Green2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mustafa Feika · IOLTiffin University2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Quincy Smith · DLNot reported2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Sam Siafa · DLPenn State2026-01-283★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tucker Smack · KNot reported2026-01-123★ / 0.8000Immediate
Outgoing · 8 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex Nash-Lally · SMaine2026-01-213★ / —Immediate
Anthony Crenshaw Jr. · SBaylor2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Anwar O'neal · OTLouisville2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Meikhi Cuttino · LBNot reported2025-12-223★ / —Immediate
Micah Pryor · DLNot reported2025-12-11— / —Immediate
Nyair Domnie · CBNew Hampshire2026-01-19— / —Immediate
Skyler Sholder · KNot reported2025-12-25— / —Immediate
Thomas Amankwaa · WRNot reported2025-12-254★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Delaware. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Ryan Carty · career 7–6 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 1 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Ryan Carty · active at capture

    7–6 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2021-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Ryan Carty · incomplete attribution0–0——-12.9-10.5115—
2025 · Ryan Carty7–64–41–0-10.9-12.4137—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:03 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play83 / 13840.192 / 13833.6
Success rate90 / 13835.083 / 13840.1
Explosiveness36 / 13874.5112 / 13819.0
Standard-down success83 / 13840.1106 / 13823.4
Passing-down success91 / 13834.357 / 13859.1
Pass PPA66 / 13852.6109 / 13821.2
Rush PPA73 / 13847.457 / 13859.1
Pass explosiveness22 / 13884.791 / 13834.3
Rush explosiveness112 / 13819.085 / 13838.7
Line yards85 / 13838.774 / 13846.7
Second-level yards81 / 13841.679 / 13843.1
Open-field yards117 / 13815.357 / 13859.1
Stuff rate91 / 13834.390 / 13835.0
Power success113 / 13818.2120 / 13813.1
Havoc125 / 1389.544 / 13868.6
Front-seven havoc92 / 13833.6T52 / 13861.7
DB havocT130 / 1385.1T42 / 13869.0
Points / opportunity52 / 13862.849 / 13865.0
Average field positionT59 / 13856.9T60 / 13856.6
Field-position expected pointsT71 / 13848.566 / 13852.6

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Nick Minicucci · QBUsage 45.7% · Avg PPA 0.319 · Total 48.849
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.31948.84945.7%
Pass0.31543.11178.3%
Rush0.75010.4939.2%
1st down-0.022-1.45444.9%
2nd down0.43720.08341.8%
3rd down0.59720.88752.2%
Standard downs0.11010.33742.3%
Passing downs0.65338.51352.2%
EJ Archield Jr. · QBUsage 36.5% · Avg PPA 0.031 · Total 0.718
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0310.71836.5%
Pass0.3196.06152.8%
Rush-1.336-5.34316.7%
1st down0.5795.21033.3%
2nd down0.1311.05144.4%
3rd down-0.924-5.54342.9%
Standard downs0.1962.54431.0%
Passing downs-0.183-1.82647.6%
Tyler Bell · QBUsage 34.8% · Avg PPA 0.169 · Total 12.018
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.16912.01834.8%
Pass0.19010.46849.5%
Rush0.0971.55118.6%
1st down0.1855.90735.6%
2nd down0.3096.78933.3%
3rd down0.4987.47638.5%
Standard downs-0.044-1.95031.9%
Passing downs0.51713.96940.9%
Jo'Nathan Silver · RBUsage 17.4% · Avg PPA 0.008 · Total 0.686
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0080.68617.4%
Pass0.1051.0454.0%
Rush-0.005-0.35935.5%
1st down-0.231-8.76818.5%
2nd down0.2005.60518.5%
3rd down0.0350.49714.9%
Standard downs-0.121-7.36619.9%
Passing downs0.4038.05212.6%
Braden Streeter · QBUsage 16.2% · Avg PPA -0.393 · Total -16.512
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.393-16.51216.2%
Pass-0.257-8.99724.5%
Rush-0.596-2.9824.6%
1st down-0.214-2.78211.6%
2nd down-0.510-6.11814.5%
3rd down-0.054-0.81726.8%
Standard downs-0.481-10.09313.0%
Passing downs-0.306-6.41921.4%
Sean Wilson · WRUsage 10.8% · Avg PPA 0.403 · Total 20.162
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.40320.16210.8%
Pass0.40320.16219.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.43911.41912.7%
2nd down0.2603.8959.9%
3rd down0.9576.7007.4%
Standard downs0.30610.70611.4%
Passing downs0.6309.4569.4%
Riley Trujillo · QBUsage 10.5% · Avg PPA -0.011 · Total -0.064
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.011-0.06410.5%
Pass0.0640.25814.3%
Rush-0.161-0.3227.4%
1st down-1.016-2.0329.1%
2nd down0.9152.74515.0%
3rd down-0.777-0.7777.1%
Standard downs-0.712-2.1378.8%
Passing downs0.6912.07313.0%
Kaderris Roberts · RBUsage 10.1% · Avg PPA 0.461 · Total 21.680
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.46121.68010.1%
Pass1.01115.1586.0%
Rush0.2046.52216.0%
1st down0.1624.05712.2%
2nd down0.68412.31411.9%
3rd down1.3275.3094.3%
Standard downs0.34512.76412.1%
Passing downs0.8928.9166.3%
Da'Wain Lofton · WRUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 0.284 · Total 10.497
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.28410.4978.0%
Pass0.28810.37814.3%
Rush0.1180.1180.5%
1st down-0.071-1.2058.3%
2nd down0.91810.1017.3%
3rd down0.7195.7498.5%
Standard downs-0.268-6.9818.5%
Passing downs1.58917.4776.9%
Viron Ellison Jr. · RBUsage 7.5% · Avg PPA 0.510 · Total 17.853
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.51017.8537.5%
Pass1.4198.5172.4%
Rush0.3229.33614.5%
1st down0.5035.5305.4%
2nd down0.1842.5759.3%
3rd down0.1871.1236.4%
Standard downs0.65716.4368.2%
Passing downs0.1421.4176.3%
Donovan Lewis · WRUsage 7.3% · Avg PPA 0.562 · Total 19.104
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56219.1047.3%
Pass0.56219.10413.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3124.6787.3%
2nd down0.7197.1956.6%
3rd down0.7325.8588.5%
Standard downs0.4357.3965.6%
Passing downs0.68911.70810.7%
Bryson Graves · WRUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.216 · Total 6.705
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2166.7056.7%
Pass0.2256.73911.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5356.4175.9%
2nd down-0.032-0.2595.3%
3rd down0.0500.54711.7%
Standard downs0.5429.2185.6%
Passing downs-0.179-2.5138.8%
Tae'Sean Robinson · WRUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.160 · Total 1.760
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1601.7605.8%
Pass0.1601.76010.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.510-1.0202.4%
2nd down0.2421.4529.8%
3rd down0.4431.3287.3%
Standard downs-0.138-0.5513.3%
Passing downs0.3302.31110.3%
Nakeem Powell · RBUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.223 · Total 1.782
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2231.7825.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2231.78212.3%
1st down0.3451.3786.1%
2nd down0.1010.4038.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2771.6645.9%
Passing downs0.0590.1174.5%
Jared Porter · RBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.210 · Total 2.312
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2102.3124.2%
Pass-0.229-0.2290.7%
Rush0.2542.5418.6%
1st down0.1340.9386.1%
2nd down0.2110.6323.5%
3rd down0.7410.7411.9%
Standard downs0.1841.6595.1%
Passing downs0.3260.6532.3%
Nick Tyree · WRUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA -0.714 · Total -3.570
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.714-3.5703.7%
Pass-0.714-3.5706.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.139-1.1391.6%
2nd down1.2682.5364.9%
3rd down-1.036-1.0363.7%
Standard downs-2.035-6.1053.4%
Passing downs1.2682.5364.4%
Matt McKinley · WRUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.560 · Total 3.362
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5603.3623.1%
Pass0.5603.3625.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.2083.6243.6%
2nd down0.8070.8071.6%
3rd down-0.534-1.0694.9%
Standard downs1.1084.4313.3%
Passing downs-0.534-1.0692.9%
Josh Humes · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 1.560 · Total 3.119
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.5603.1193.0%
Pass1.5603.1194.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.5603.11915.4%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.5603.1198.0%
Elijah Sessoms · TEUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.748 · Total 8.226
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7488.2262.4%
Pass0.7488.2264.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9973.9872.0%
2nd down0.5232.0922.6%
3rd down0.7162.1473.2%
Standard downs0.9735.8402.0%
Passing downs0.4772.3863.1%
Scott Moore · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 1.036 · Total 7.252
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0367.2522.1%
Pass1.0367.2524.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5102.0422.8%
2nd down0.7681.5371.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.1435.7152.3%
Passing downs0.7681.5371.7%
Ty Salazer · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.722 · Total -0.722
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.722-0.7221.5%
Pass-0.722-0.7222.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.722-0.7223.2%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.722-0.7222.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Calvin Thomas · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -1.006 · Total -1.006
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.006-1.0061.4%
Pass-1.006-1.0062.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.006-1.0064.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-1.006-1.0064.2%
Greg Spiller · RBUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.232 · Total 0.232
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2320.2321.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2320.2323.7%
1st down0.2320.2322.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2320.2322.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jackson Whitacre · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 1.548 · Total 1.548
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.5481.5481.4%
Pass1.5481.5482.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.5481.5482.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.5481.5482.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Delaware sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.112 (40th percentile; 138 teams)40thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.411 (35th percentile; 138 teams)35thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.295 (74th percentile; 138 teams)74thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.224 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.098 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.124 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.419 (40th percentile; 138 teams)40thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.310 (19th percentile; 138 teams)19thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.171 (69th percentile; 138 teams)69th
Values and percentiles
Delaware metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.11240th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.41135th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.29574th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.22453rd138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.09847th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.12434th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.41940th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.31019th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.17169th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 277 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.4 yards (72nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.3 per completion. Completion 58.8%, 8.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.33.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense59.2%61.4%-2.3196 / 277
Defense allowed64.3%61.1%+3.2199 / 284

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Delaware.

Target mix by zone, Delaware offense
Short left30% · 80Short middle16% · 42Short right37% · 99Deep left5% · 14Deep middle4% · 11Deep right8% · 21

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Delaware passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense277100%9.46.358.8%0.33-2.3 pp196
Passing defense28499%8.66.662.0%0.25+3.2 pp199

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2503.444.1%0.113.101.000.7018.6%61.8%
Defense allowed2674.246.9%0.173.101.101.2013.0%81.8%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense247 / 2502391122680219 / 220 · 99.5%
Defense allowed262 / 2672442321770237 / 239 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.3 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-28.4-3.521.4W1W2W2 vs Vanderbilt: -18.2 ppW3W3 vs Coastal Carolina: +11.9 ppW4W4 vs Virginia: -28.4 ppW5W5 vs Liberty: -14.7 ppW7W8W8 vs Missouri State: +7.2 ppW9W9 vs Western Kentucky: +21.4 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Merrimack430———11.10.46284.00.29
W2Vanderbilt323246.9%65.1%-18.2 pp6.4-0.05362.70.14
W3Coastal Carolina323275.0%63.1%+11.9 pp8.70.50313.00.04
W4Virginia272725.9%54.4%-28.4 pp14.8-0.35303.00.01
W5Liberty353548.6%63.3%-14.7 pp9.10.05253.9-0.21
W7Middle Tennessee370———9.10.59302.30.12
W8Missouri State333265.6%58.5%+7.2 pp8.20.67425.10.45
W9Western Kentucky383884.2%62.8%+21.4 pp8.40.61282.9-0.09

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

38 punts · 42.1 gross yards/punt · 38.5 net yards/punt

10 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 37/38 punts. Known net yards: 29/38 punts.

Our punt returns

5 returns · 3.8 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

1 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 5/5 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Western Kentucky343.036.33/3
Week 8 · Missouri State0——0/0
Week 7 · Middle Tennessee644.339.04/6
Week 5 · Liberty543.445.04/5
Week 4 · Virginia740.036.86/7
Team style
Rating history