Record
1-6 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
SP+ workbook recordCharlotte
2026 season
American Athletic
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Charlotte's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 133 across 8 systems; best 127, worst 136, so they disagree by 9 places.
- Lab EPA
- #127
- Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #135
- down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #136
- down 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #134
- down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #133
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #127
- no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #133
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #127
- up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #128 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #68 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #103 of 138
- Game control
- #132 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #133 of 138
- Offense
- #134 of 138
- Defense
- #129 of 138
- Special teams
- #98 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Charlotte · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
-0.168 net EPA/play
#127
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
-17.17 points
#135 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -17.91 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -1.73, schedule #57 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +1.66. That is worth -19.64 on its own; the preseason prior of -9.73 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -17.17.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Charlotte · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · The Citadel home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401862694 | -2.00 → -1.00 (OT) | -2.50 | 0.7637 | 9.52% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | -0.333 | -2.381 | -2.714 |
| Week 2 · Ole Miss away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856676 | -32.00 → -32.00 | +2.50 | 0.7937 | 9.90% | +14.02 | -2.920 | 1.388 | -1.532 |
| Week 3 · App State away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401864574 | -5.00 → -5.00 | +2.50 | 0.8249 | 10.29% | -4.01 | -0.257 | -0.413 | -0.670 |
| Week 4 · Louisiana home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401862780 | -27.00 → -27.00 | -2.50 | 0.8572 | 10.69% | -0.55 | -3.154 | -0.059 | -3.213 |
| Week 5 · Memphis home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862787 | -51.00 → -35.00 | -2.50 | 0.8909 | 11.11% | +2.46 | -4.166 | 0.273 | -3.893 |
| Week 6 · North Texas away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401862796 | -40.00 → -35.00 | +2.50 | 0.9259 | 11.55% | +5.88 | -3.753 | 0.679 | -3.074 |
| Week 7 · Temple away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862803 | +7.00 → +7.00 | +2.50 | 0.9622 | 12.00% | -6.53 | 1.140 | -0.784 | 0.356 |
Game terms -14.74 points; prior term -2.43 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -17.17 points. The preseason prior is -9.73 with 24.94% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
-25.4 SP+ points
#136 · Down 1 place
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
-15.98 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#127 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -10.08 on 274 plays; defense 5.91 on 352 plays.
2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Charlotte 8 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 1-6 · conf 1-2 · home 0-3 · away 1-3 · expected wins 1.0
- Polls (Week 9)
- unranked
- CFP latest
- not published
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 3-4 ATS (-4.7 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (-2.3 avg)
- Head coach
- Tim Albin · hired 2024-12-08 · 1-11 over 2 captured seasons
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #74 (170 pts) · 2025 #144 (39 pts) · 2026 #103 (177 pts)
- Returning
- 41% of production · 48% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing 113% 89% Receiving 16% 14% Rushing 27% 31% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 7 | 3.00 | 0.8374 | 5.86 |
| Defensive Line | 6 | 3.00 | 0.8445 | 5.07 |
| Linebacker | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8389 | 4.19 |
| Offensive Line | 7 | 3.00 | 0.8419 | 5.89 |
| Quarterback | 3 | 3.00 | 0.8544 | 2.56 |
| Receiver | 7 | 3.00 | 0.8344 | 5.84 |
| Running Back | 3 | 3.00 | 0.8737 | 2.62 |
| Special Teams | 2 | 3.00 | 0.8550 | 1.71 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cole Gonzales · QBCFBD athlete 5089540. Pittsburgh (2025–2025); Charlotte (2026–2026); Western Carolina (2022–2024) | Passing WEPA | 0.172 | 83 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2022: stars unavailable |
Conner Harrell · QBCFBD athlete 4801306. North Carolina (2022–2024); Charlotte (2025–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.278 | 76 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2022: 3★ · 0.8685 |
Henry Rutledge · RBCFBD athlete 4879655. Charlotte (2021–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.173 | 51 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | Not linked |
Khamani Alexander · RBCFBD athlete 5148741. App State (2024–2025); Charlotte (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.094 | 44 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2024: 3★ · 0.8567 |
Ian Kelly · PCFBD athlete 5293895. Charlotte (2025–2026) | Kicker PAAR | 0.340 | 5 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | Not linked |
Aiden Bui · PKCFBD athlete 5293889. Charlotte (2025–2026) | Kicker PAAR | -0.560 | 2 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2025: stars unavailable |
Transfers
Incoming · 19 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Pedro · WR | Southeast Missouri State | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Chance Williams · RB | Cincinnati | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Cole Gonzales · QB | Pittsburgh | 2026-01-08 | — / — | Immediate |
| D'Mariun Perteet · RB | Coastal Carolina | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| D'Nas White · DL | Catawba | 2025-12-03 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Devin Ancrum · DL | North Carolina | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Henry Searcy · LS | Pittsburgh | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| J'ven Williams · OT | Penn State | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jaden Barnes · WR | App State | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jameel Croft Jr. · CB | Kansas | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Khamani Alexander · RB | App State | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Lane Wadle · TE | Georgia State | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Logan Mauldin · TE | McNeese | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Luke Sandy · IOL | Wyoming | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Mathias Nielsen · OT | Virginia Union | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Nicolas Cruji · IOL | Maine | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Shamar McIntosh · S | Maryland | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Tank Boston · WR | NC State | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Zyheem Collick · WR | Bryant | 2026-01-09 | — / — | Immediate |
Outgoing · 27 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aiden Martinez · IOL | Not reported | 2025-12-09 | — / — | Immediate |
| Andrew Bennett · P | James Madison | 2026-01-12 | — / — | Immediate |
| Andrew Cunningham · IOL | North Texas | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| CJ Stokes · RB | Not reported | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Cary Grant · S | App State | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Cheick Kaba · DL | Not reported | 2026-01-07 | — / — | Immediate |
| Curtis Simpson · EDGE | Not reported | 2025-12-30 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Devin Davis · IOL | South Florida | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8100 | TBD |
| Don Chaney Jr. · RB | UL Monroe | 2026-01-22 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Dwight Bootle II · CB | Arizona | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Eli Samples · OT | Not reported | 2026-01-09 | — / — | Withdrawn |
| Gavin Willis · LB | Not reported | 2026-01-06 | — / — | Withdrawn |
| JJ Okate · LB | Not reported | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jake Young · TE | Western Carolina | 2026-02-04 | — / — | Immediate |
| Javen Nicholas · WR | Duke | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Jayden McGowan · WR | Baylor | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Liam Boyd · K | Michigan State | 2026-01-07 | — / — | Immediate |
| Mason Bowers · OT | Not reported | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Miles Burris · WR | Akron | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Mo Clipper Jr. · IOL | Georgia Southern | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Rod Gainey Jr. · RB | LSU | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8500 | TBD |
| Ta'ir Brooks · WR | Not reported | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Tyler Gibson · OT | UCF | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Umar Rockhead · OT | Not reported | 2025-12-22 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Xavier Miles · DL | Memphis | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Yamil Talib · EDGE | Colorado | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Zach Wilcke · QB | Northwestern State | 2026-01-10 | — / — | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Charlotte. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Tim Albin · career 35–30 across 6 seasons and 2 schools
Tenure timeline · 6 appointments
2025–present · Tim Albin · active at capture
1–11 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons
Hired 2024-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2024–2024 · Tim Brewster · interim
2–0 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2024-11-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2023–2024 · Biff Poggi
6–16 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2022-11-15. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2022–2022 · Peter Rossomando · interim
2–2 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2022-10-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2019–2022 · Will Healy
15–24 · 39 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2018-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2015–2018 · Brad Lambert
12–36 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 2011-03-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Tim Albin · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | -24.8 | -20.3 | 103 | — |
| 2025 · Tim Albin | 1–11 | 0–8 | 0–0 | -26.7 | -21.8 | 144 | — |
| 2024 · Tim Brewster · incomplete attribution | 2–0 | — | — | -15.3 | -12.4 | 74 | — |
| 2024 · Biff Poggi · incomplete attribution | 3–7 | — | — | -15.3 | -12.4 | 74 | — |
| 2023 · Biff Poggi | 3–9 | 2–6 | 0–0 | -21.4 | -17.4 | 129 | — |
| 2022 · Will Healy · incomplete attribution | 1–7 | — | — | -16.4 | -18.8 | 107 | — |
| 2022 · Peter Rossomando · incomplete attribution | 2–2 | — | — | -16.4 | -18.8 | 107 | — |
| 2021 · Will Healy | 5–7 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -13.7 | -16.4 | 101 | — |
| 2020 · Will Healy | 2–4 | 2–2 | 0–0 | -6.6 | -14.8 | 88 | — |
| 2019 · Will Healy | 7–6 | 5–3 | 0–1 | -6.3 | -10.3 | 132 | — |
| 2018 · Brad Lambert | 5–7 | 4–4 | 0–0 | -18.5 | -12.2 | 111 | — |
| 2017 · Brad Lambert | 1–11 | 1–7 | 0–0 | -26.1 | -25.4 | 114 | — |
| 2016 · Brad Lambert | 4–8 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -20.9 | -19.6 | 119 | — |
| 2015 · Brad Lambert | 2–10 | 0–8 | 0–0 | -21.7 | -27.9 | 126 | — |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
An accepted season overview is unavailable for this team in 2026.
2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | -0.052 | 5th138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.362 | 5th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.198 | 34th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | 0.067 | 15th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | -0.104 | 3rd138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | 0.239 | 9th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.487 | 4th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.245 | 39th138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.114 | 4th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 204 attempts charted. Average depth of target 6.9 yards (7th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.6 per completion. Completion 64.7%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.01.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 63.8% | 65.4% | -1.6 | 163 / 204 |
| Defense allowed | 71.9% | 62.6% | +9.3 | 199 / 217 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Charlotte.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 204 | 100% | 6.9 | 5.6 | 64.7% | 0.01 | -1.6 pp | 163 |
| Passing defense | 217 | 98% | 7.7 | 6.5 | 71.9% | 0.48 | +9.3 pp | 199 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 200 | 4.0 | 37.0% | 0.01 | 2.60 | 1.00 | 1.40 | 23.9% | 59.3% |
| Defense allowed | 278 | 4.7 | 48.3% | 0.25 | 3.20 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 18.8% | 76.1% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 197 / 200 | 193 | 7 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 183 / 184 · 99.5% |
| Defense allowed | 277 / 278 | 271 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 258 / 261 · 98.9% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -1.6 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | The Citadel | 41 | 0 | — | — | — | 7.7 | 0.15 | 33 | 6.5 | 0.41 |
| W2 | Ole Miss | 28 | 28 | 71.4% | 62.0% | +9.5 pp | 7.5 | 0.03 | 33 | 4.3 | -0.05 |
| W3 | App State | 35 | 35 | 62.9% | 65.0% | -2.2 pp | 6.6 | -0.11 | 25 | 1.4 | -0.12 |
| W4 | Louisiana | 30 | 30 | 56.7% | 66.7% | -10.0 pp | 6.6 | -0.35 | 15 | 1.7 | -1.09 |
| W5 | Memphis | 16 | 16 | 43.8% | 65.7% | -22.0 pp | 6.6 | -0.28 | 24 | 5.5 | 0.26 |
| W6 | North Texas | 23 | 23 | 65.2% | 70.6% | -5.4 pp | 4.1 | -0.12 | 32 | 2.0 | -0.02 |
| W7 | Temple | 31 | 31 | 74.2% | 63.8% | +10.4 pp | 8.3 | 0.52 | 38 | 4.7 | 0.10 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
33 punts · 44.3 gross yards/punt · 37.7 net yards/punt
4 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 33/33 punts. Known net yards: 24/33 punts.
Our punt returns
4 returns · 2.3 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 4/4 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 7 · Temple | 1 | 45.0 | 45.0 | 1/1 |
| Week 6 · North Texas | 6 | 41.3 | 32.3 | 4/6 |
| Week 5 · Memphis | 7 | 47.3 | 41.4 | 5/7 |
| Week 4 · Louisiana | 6 | 45.5 | 36.0 | 4/6 |
| Week 3 · App State | 5 | 42.2 | 44.0 | 4/5 |