Record
3-5 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
SP+ workbook recordCentral Michigan
2026 season
Mid-American
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Central Michigan's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 118 across 8 systems; best 102, worst 127, so they disagree by 25 places.
- Lab EPA
- #102
- Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #118
- no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #127
- down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #120
- up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #121
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #118
- down 5 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #115
- up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #102
- up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #116 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #62 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #138 of 138
- Game control
- #131 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #128 of 138
- Offense
- #132 of 138
- Defense
- #97 of 138
- Special teams
- #110 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Central Michigan · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
-0.082 net EPA/play
#102
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
-8.47 points
#118 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -6.65 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.34, schedule #75 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.58. That is worth -9.99 on its own; the preseason prior of -3.13 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -8.47.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Central Michigan · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · New Mexico away · 2026-09-06 · ID 401864498 | -31.00 → -31.00 | +2.50 | 0.7637 | 8.47% | +8.10 | -2.413 | 0.686 | -1.727 |
| Week 2 · Colgate home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866415 | +3.00 → +3.00 | -2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.80% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 0.044 | -2.200 | -2.156 |
| Week 3 · Wyoming home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401864508 | +14.00 → +14.00 | -2.50 | 0.8249 | 9.15% | -8.25 | 1.052 | -0.754 | 0.297 |
| Week 4 · Miami away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858238 | -49.00 → -35.00 | +2.50 | 0.8572 | 9.51% | +19.25 | -3.089 | 1.830 | -1.259 |
| Week 5 · Akron home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866430 | +24.00 → +24.00 | -2.50 | 0.8909 | 9.88% | -16.43 | 2.124 | -1.623 | 0.501 |
| Week 6 · Ohio away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866438 | -17.00 → -17.00 | +2.50 | 0.9259 | 10.27% | -1.24 | -1.489 | -0.128 | -1.616 |
| Week 7 · Western Michigan home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866443 | -7.00 → -7.00 | -2.50 | 0.9622 | 10.67% | +0.84 | -1.014 | 0.089 | -0.924 |
| Week 8 · Miami (OH) home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866476 | -1.00 → -1.00 | -2.50 | 1.0000 | 11.09% | -4.52 | -0.388 | -0.501 | -0.889 |
Game terms -7.77 points; prior term -0.69 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -8.47 points. The preseason prior is -3.13 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
-16.7 SP+ points
#127 · Down 2 places
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
-12.83 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#118 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -5.83 on 321 plays; defense 7.00 on 364 plays.
2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Central Michigan 16 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 3-5 · conf 1-3 · home 3-2 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.9
- Polls (Week 9)
- unranked
- CFP latest
- not published
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 4-4 ATS (-2.8 avg) · 2025: 8-5 ATS (+1.1 avg)
- Head coach
- Matt Drinkall · hired 2024-12-09 · 7-6 over 2 captured seasons
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #106 (142 pts) · 2025 #113 (128 pts) · 2026 #95 (179 pts)
- Returning
- 54% of production · 42% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing 9% 18% Receiving 65% 62% Rushing 123% 47% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 10 | 3.00 | 0.8430 | 8.43 |
| Defensive Line | 9 | 2.89 | 0.8251 | 7.43 |
| Linebacker | 6 | 2.83 | 0.8197 | 4.92 |
| Offensive Line | 15 | 2.87 | 0.8247 | 12.37 |
| Quarterback | 4 | 3.00 | 0.8210 | 3.28 |
| Receiver | 15 | 3.00 | 0.8283 | 12.42 |
| Running Back | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8283 | 4.14 |
| Special Teams | 16 | 2.75 | 0.7782 | 12.45 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angel H Flores · QBCFBD athlete 5084769. Central Michigan (2025–2026); Northern Arizona (2022–2024) | Rushing WEPA | 0.198 | 99 | 51.5% | Pass 64.5% · Rush 45.5%1st 43.0% · 2nd 48.9% · 3rd 65.6% Standard downs 46.9% · Passing downs 61.7% | 2022: 3★ · 0.8206 |
Angel H Flores · QBCFBD athlete 5084769. Central Michigan (2025–2026); Northern Arizona (2022–2024) | Passing WEPA | 0.054 | 87 | 51.5% | Pass 64.5% · Rush 45.5%1st 43.0% · 2nd 48.9% · 3rd 65.6% Standard downs 46.9% · Passing downs 61.7% | 2022: 3★ · 0.8206 |
Jadyn Glasser · QBCFBD athlete 5149056. Central Michigan (2024–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.275 | 73 | 22.7% | Pass 42.5% · Rush 8.0%1st 21.6% · 2nd 19.0% · 3rd 30.9% Standard downs 18.9% · Passing downs 29.9% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8230 |
Jayden Clerveaux · RBCFBD athlete 5157391. Holy Cross (2023–2025); Central Michigan (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.255 | 47 | 13.0% | Pass 2.0% · Rush 20.2%1st 17.8% · 2nd 11.1% · 3rd 8.8% Standard downs 16.5% · Passing downs 5.3% | 2023: stars unavailable |
Vaughn Blue · RBCFBD athlete 5122147. Central Michigan (2026–2026); Liberty (2023–2025) | Rushing WEPA | 0.097 | 34 | 11.1% | Pass 5.7% · Rush 14.8%1st 13.6% · 2nd 14.1% · 3rd 4.3% Standard downs 13.5% · Passing downs 5.8% | 2023: stars unavailable |
Caden Vanhuis · PKCFBD athlete 5252199. Central Michigan (2025–2026) | Kicker PAAR | -1.900 | 6 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2025: 3★ · 0.8183 |
Braylen Naves · WRCFBD athlete 5216575. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.1% | Pass 10.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 5.6% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 4.7% Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 5.2% | Not linked |
Brock Townsend · RBCFBD athlete 5146689. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 5.2% | Pass 5.4% · Rush 5.3%1st 7.6% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 5.6% Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 3.2% | Not linked |
Collin Payne · WRCFBD athlete 5295489. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.0% | Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.6% | Not linked |
Da'Shon Febres · WRCFBD athlete 5327593. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.1% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.0% | Not linked |
Gavin Spillers · TECFBD athlete 5387647. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.0% | Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Jaden Allen · TECFBD athlete 4876695. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.9% | Pass 10.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 6.8% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 2.4% Standard downs 5.0% · Passing downs 4.6% | Not linked |
Jordan Stapleton · RBCFBD athlete 5387641. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.4%1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.0% | Not linked |
Justin Ruffin Jr. · WRCFBD athlete 5295488. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.6% | Pass 15.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 5.5% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 10.0% Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 10.5% | Not linked |
Langston Lewis · WRCFBD athlete 4869694. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 9.1% | Pass 21.0% · Rush 1.8%1st 6.6% · 2nd 9.4% · 3rd 15.0% Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 14.2% | Not linked |
Marcus Beamon · QBCFBD athlete 5295480. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 8.8% | Pass 17.3% · Rush 1.7%1st 4.4% · 2nd 13.9% · 3rd 10.0% Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 14.6% | Not linked |
Myles Peters · TECFBD athlete 5387646. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.3% | Pass 5.9% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.1% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 2.1% Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 4.4% | Not linked |
Nasir Williams · WRCFBD athlete 5193288. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.6% | Pass 7.3% · Rush 0.4%1st 3.5% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 6.4% Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 5.6% | Not linked |
Nicholas Woodford · RBCFBD athlete 5305463. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 8.3% | Pass 6.1% · Rush 10.2%1st 8.6% · 2nd 13.6% · 3rd 1.1% Standard downs 9.7% · Passing downs 5.3% | Not linked |
Rusty VanWetzinga · FBCFBD athlete 5150658. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.5% | Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.5% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 1.4% | Not linked |
Shawn Foster · WRCFBD athlete 5221139. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.2% | Pass 10.3% · Rush 1.1%1st 1.7% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 6.7% Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 10.5% | Not linked |
Tayte Vanderleest · WRCFBD athlete 5151494. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.2% | Pass 6.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 6.9% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 3.8% | Not linked |
Trav Moore · RBCFBD athlete 5211741. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.0% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 5.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Transfers
Incoming · 12 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrell Bryant Jr. · S | Northern Colorado | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Donavan Philord · CB | Campbell | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Dontae Robinson · TE | Sacramento State | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| Gavin Spillers · TE | Mars Hill | 2026-01-08 | — / — | Immediate |
| Jaden Allen · TE | Fordham | 2026-01-09 | 2★ / — | Immediate |
| Jayden Clerveaux · RB | Holy Cross | 2026-01-09 | — / — | Immediate |
| Justin Taylor · S | Wyoming | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Losini Maka · IOL | Georgetown | 2026-01-09 | — / — | Immediate |
| Nic DiSanto · OT | Eastern Illinois | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Shawn Foster · WR | Michigan State | 2026-01-11 | 2★ / 0.7900 | Immediate |
| Trevor Swan · OT | Georgetown | 2026-01-09 | — / — | Immediate |
| Vaughn Blue · RB | Liberty | 2026-01-09 | — / — | Immediate |
Outgoing · 17 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Thomas · LB | Not reported | 2025-12-29 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Apisa Poumele · IOL | Coastal Carolina | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Brenden Deasfernandes · CB | Northwestern | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Bryce Rowe · CB | Not reported | 2026-01-01 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| DeCorion Temple · TE | Oregon State | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jacob Booth · OT | Not reported | 2025-12-28 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jacob Saurbeck · OT | Not reported | 2025-12-27 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jordan Kelly · WR | Not reported | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Kade Kostus · DL | Bowling Green | 2026-03-26 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Kalen Carroll · CB | TCU | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Keshawn Hayden · EDGE | Eastern Kentucky | 2026-01-19 | 2★ / — | Immediate |
| Langston Lewis · WR | Not reported | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Withdrawn |
| Oumar Conde · EDGE | Not reported | 2025-12-27 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Ryan Blum · IOL | Not reported | 2025-12-29 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Travis Ambrose · TE | Not reported | 2026-04-07 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Trey Cornist · RB | UConn | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Tyson Davis · WR | Virginia | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Central Michigan. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Matt Drinkall · career 7–6 across 2 seasons and 1 schools
Tenure timeline · 10 appointments
2025–present · Matt Drinkall · active at capture
7–6 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons
Hired 2024-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2019–2024 · Jim McElwain
33–36 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons
Hired 2018-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2015–2018 · John Bonamego
22–29 · 51 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 2015-02-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2010–2014 · Dan Enos
26–36 · 62 attributed games · 5 seasons
Hired 2010-01-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2007–2009 · Butch Jones
27–13 · 40 attributed games · 3 seasons
Hired 2007-01-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2004–2006 · Brian Kelly
19–16 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons
Hired 2004-01-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2000–2003 · Mike DeBord
12–34 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 1999-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.
1994–1999 · Dick Flynn
30–37 · 67 attributed games · 6 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1978–1993 · Herb Deromedi
110–55–10 · 175 attributed games · 16 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1975–1977 · Roy Kramer
25–7–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Matt Drinkall · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | -16.4 | -12.2 | 95 | — |
| 2025 · Matt Drinkall | 7–6 | 5–3 | 0–1 | -8.8 | -8.4 | 113 | — |
| 2024 · Jim McElwain | 4–8 | 2–6 | 0–0 | -15.8 | -13.1 | 106 | — |
| 2023 · Jim McElwain | 5–7 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -19.1 | -15.5 | 91 | — |
| 2022 · Jim McElwain | 4–8 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -14 | -12.2 | 84 | — |
| 2021 · Jim McElwain | 9–4 | 6–2 | 1–0 | -1 | -5.3 | 87 | — |
| 2020 · Jim McElwain | 3–3 | 3–3 | 0–0 | -1.8 | — | 123 | — |
| 2019 · Jim McElwain | 8–6 | 6–3 | 0–1 | -4.4 | -6.3 | 104 | — |
| 2018 · John Bonamego | 1–11 | 0–8 | 0–0 | -20 | -18.9 | 120 | — |
| 2017 · John Bonamego | 8–5 | 6–2 | 0–1 | -8.6 | -5.6 | 93 | — |
| 2016 · John Bonamego | 6–7 | 3–5 | 0–1 | -6.1 | -9.1 | 107 | — |
| 2015 · John Bonamego | 7–6 | 6–2 | 0–1 | -3.1 | -0.2 | 97 | — |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data
Stat rankings
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:17:27 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 108 / 138 | 21.9 | 98 / 138 | 29.2 |
| Success rate | T118 / 138 | 14.2 | 121 / 138 | 12.4 |
| Explosiveness | 87 / 138 | 37.2 | 17 / 138 | 88.3 |
| Standard-down success | 117 / 138 | 15.3 | T113 / 138 | 17.9 |
| Passing-down success | 103 / 138 | 25.5 | 128 / 138 | 7.3 |
| Pass PPA | 131 / 138 | 5.1 | 43 / 138 | 69.3 |
| Rush PPA | 57 / 138 | 59.1 | 118 / 138 | 14.6 |
| Pass explosiveness | 64 / 138 | 54.0 | 16 / 138 | 89.1 |
| Rush explosiveness | 28 / 138 | 80.3 | 57 / 138 | 59.1 |
| Line yards | 28 / 138 | 80.3 | 137 / 138 | 0.7 |
| Second-level yards | 79 / 138 | 43.1 | 133 / 138 | 3.6 |
| Open-field yards | 91 / 138 | 34.3 | 47 / 138 | 66.4 |
| Stuff rate | 17 / 138 | 88.3 | 131 / 138 | 5.1 |
| Power success | 18 / 138 | 87.6 | 129 / 138 | 6.6 |
| Havoc | T56 / 138 | 58.8 | 98 / 138 | 29.2 |
| Front-seven havoc | T56 / 138 | 59.1 | T114 / 138 | 17.2 |
| DB havoc | T56 / 138 | 58.0 | T49 / 138 | 63.5 |
| Points / opportunity | 112 / 138 | 19.0 | 67 / 138 | 51.8 |
| Average field position | T79 / 138 | 40.5 | 126 / 138 | 8.8 |
| Field-position expected points | T89 / 138 | 35.4 | 132 / 138 | 4.4 |
Player PPA and usage
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
Angel H Flores · QBUsage 51.5% · Avg PPA -0.001 · Total -0.246
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.001 | -0.246 | 51.5% |
| Pass | -0.158 | -15.838 | 64.5% |
| Rush | 0.185 | 21.650 | 45.5% |
| 1st down | -0.333 | -24.622 | 43.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.075 | 5.113 | 48.9% |
| 3rd down | 0.160 | 9.730 | 65.6% |
| Standard downs | -0.070 | -9.485 | 46.9% |
| Passing downs | 0.113 | 9.239 | 61.7% |
Jadyn Glasser · QBUsage 22.7% · Avg PPA 0.048 · Total 4.528
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.048 | 4.528 | 22.7% |
| Pass | 0.055 | 4.149 | 42.5% |
| Rush | -0.020 | -0.357 | 8.0% |
| 1st down | -0.518 | -19.158 | 21.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.189 | 4.911 | 19.0% |
| 3rd down | 0.872 | 25.275 | 30.9% |
| Standard downs | -0.109 | -5.693 | 18.9% |
| Passing downs | 0.238 | 10.221 | 29.9% |
Jayden Clerveaux · RBUsage 13.0% · Avg PPA 0.288 · Total 15.240
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.288 | 15.240 | 13.0% |
| Pass | 0.340 | 1.019 | 2.0% |
| Rush | 0.284 | 14.221 | 20.2% |
| 1st down | 0.075 | 2.255 | 17.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.153 | 2.299 | 11.1% |
| 3rd down | 1.336 | 10.686 | 8.8% |
| Standard downs | 0.111 | 5.114 | 16.5% |
| Passing downs | 1.447 | 10.126 | 5.3% |
Vaughn Blue · RBUsage 11.1% · Avg PPA -0.059 · Total -2.839
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.059 | -2.839 | 11.1% |
| Pass | -0.199 | -1.787 | 5.7% |
| Rush | -0.027 | -1.052 | 14.8% |
| 1st down | -0.017 | -0.415 | 13.6% |
| 2nd down | -0.040 | -0.795 | 14.1% |
| 3rd down | -0.407 | -1.629 | 4.3% |
| Standard downs | -0.027 | -1.086 | 13.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.219 | -1.753 | 5.8% |
Langston Lewis · WRUsage 9.1% · Avg PPA 0.505 · Total 22.211
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.505 | 22.211 | 9.1% |
| Pass | 0.594 | 23.151 | 21.0% |
| Rush | -0.188 | -0.940 | 1.8% |
| 1st down | 0.135 | 1.760 | 6.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.427 | 6.412 | 9.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.877 | 14.038 | 15.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.410 | 9.011 | 6.7% |
| Passing downs | 0.600 | 13.200 | 14.2% |
Marcus Beamon · QBUsage 8.8% · Avg PPA -0.095 · Total -0.949
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.095 | -0.949 | 8.8% |
| Pass | 0.073 | 0.656 | 17.3% |
| Rush | -1.605 | -1.605 | 1.7% |
| 1st down | -0.032 | -0.063 | 4.4% |
| 2nd down | -0.041 | -0.205 | 13.9% |
| 3rd down | -0.227 | -0.680 | 10.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.413 | 1.652 | 5.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.433 | -2.601 | 14.6% |
Nicholas Woodford · RBUsage 8.3% · Avg PPA 0.007 · Total 0.240
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.007 | 0.240 | 8.3% |
| Pass | -0.247 | -2.471 | 6.1% |
| Rush | 0.108 | 2.711 | 10.2% |
| 1st down | 0.120 | 1.804 | 8.6% |
| 2nd down | -0.083 | -1.577 | 13.6% |
| 3rd down | 0.013 | 0.013 | 1.1% |
| Standard downs | 0.066 | 1.853 | 9.7% |
| Passing downs | -0.230 | -1.613 | 5.3% |
Justin Ruffin Jr. · WRUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA -0.155 · Total -3.711
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.155 | -3.711 | 6.6% |
| Pass | -0.155 | -3.711 | 15.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.419 | -3.349 | 5.5% |
| 2nd down | -0.191 | -0.953 | 4.2% |
| 3rd down | -0.211 | -1.691 | 10.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.172 | -1.893 | 4.6% |
| Passing downs | -0.140 | -1.818 | 10.5% |
Brock Townsend · RBUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA 0.118 · Total 2.960
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.118 | 2.960 | 5.2% |
| Pass | 0.098 | 0.983 | 5.4% |
| Rush | 0.132 | 1.977 | 5.3% |
| 1st down | 0.072 | 1.073 | 7.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.528 | 2.111 | 2.5% |
| 3rd down | -0.037 | -0.224 | 5.6% |
| Standard downs | 0.129 | 2.575 | 6.1% |
| Passing downs | 0.077 | 0.386 | 3.2% |
Jaden Allen · TEUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA -0.217 · Total -1.954
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.217 | -1.954 | 4.9% |
| Pass | -0.217 | -1.954 | 10.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.180 | -0.898 | 6.8% |
| 2nd down | 1.058 | 2.116 | 3.3% |
| 3rd down | 0.412 | 0.412 | 2.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.364 | 2.184 | 5.0% |
| Passing downs | -1.380 | -4.139 | 4.6% |
Shawn Foster · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.252 · Total 3.027
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.252 | 3.027 | 4.2% |
| Pass | 0.260 | 2.603 | 10.3% |
| Rush | 0.212 | 0.424 | 1.1% |
| 1st down | -1.002 | -2.003 | 1.7% |
| 2nd down | 0.694 | 4.165 | 6.3% |
| 3rd down | 0.216 | 0.865 | 6.7% |
| Standard downs | -0.450 | -1.351 | 1.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.486 | 4.378 | 10.5% |
Braylen Naves · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.120 · Total 2.404
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.120 | 2.404 | 4.1% |
| Pass | 0.120 | 2.404 | 10.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.136 | -1.496 | 5.6% |
| 2nd down | -0.370 | -1.479 | 2.5% |
| 3rd down | 1.076 | 5.379 | 4.7% |
| Standard downs | -0.203 | -2.438 | 3.6% |
| Passing downs | 0.605 | 4.842 | 5.2% |
Nasir Williams · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.392 · Total 5.878
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.392 | 5.878 | 3.6% |
| Pass | 0.125 | 1.619 | 7.3% |
| Rush | 3.524 | 3.524 | 0.4% |
| 1st down | -0.235 | -1.412 | 3.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.378 | 0.757 | 1.5% |
| 3rd down | 0.502 | 3.010 | 6.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.302 | 2.112 | 2.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.471 | 3.766 | 5.6% |
Myles Peters · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.231 · Total -2.314
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.231 | -2.314 | 2.3% |
| Pass | -0.231 | -2.314 | 5.9% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.452 | -0.903 | 1.1% |
| 2nd down | -0.487 | -2.922 | 4.2% |
| 3rd down | 0.755 | 1.511 | 2.1% |
| Standard downs | -0.514 | -2.056 | 1.3% |
| Passing downs | -0.043 | -0.258 | 4.4% |
Tayte Vanderleest · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.423 · Total 1.690
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.423 | 1.690 | 2.2% |
| Pass | 0.423 | 1.690 | 6.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.423 | 1.690 | 6.9% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 1.083 | 2.166 | 1.6% |
| Passing downs | -0.238 | -0.475 | 3.8% |
Collin Payne · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.085 · Total 0.085
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.085 | 0.085 | 2.0% |
| Pass | 0.085 | 0.085 | 3.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.085 | 0.085 | 5.9% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.085 | 0.085 | 5.6% |
Gavin Spillers · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.606 · Total 0.606
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.606 | 0.606 | 2.0% |
| Pass | 0.606 | 0.606 | 3.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.606 | 0.606 | 4.8% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.606 | 0.606 | 3.0% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Trav Moore · RBUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.929 · Total -0.929
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.929 | -0.929 | 2.0% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.929 | -0.929 | 5.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.929 | -0.929 | 5.9% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.929 | -0.929 | 3.0% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Da'Shon Febres · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.283 · Total 0.283
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.283 | 0.283 | 1.7% |
| Pass | 0.283 | 0.283 | 3.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | 0.283 | 0.283 | 7.1% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.283 | 0.283 | 5.0% |
Jordan Stapleton · RBUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.407 · Total 0.407
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.407 | 0.407 | 1.7% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.407 | 0.407 | 3.4% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.407 | 0.407 | 5.9% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.407 | 0.407 | 5.0% |
Rusty VanWetzinga · FBUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.537 · Total 1.611
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.537 | 1.611 | 1.5% |
| Pass | 0.537 | 1.611 | 3.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.551 | 1.102 | 2.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.510 | 0.510 | 1.6% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.551 | 1.102 | 1.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.510 | 0.510 | 1.4% |
2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.053 | 22nd138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.386 | 14th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.205 | 37th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | -0.039 | 5th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.130 | 59th138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | 0.142 | 29th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.461 | 12th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.116 | 88th138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.143 | 29th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 174 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.9 yards (62nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.6 per completion. Completion 58.0%, 5.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.01.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 59.2% | 62.6% | -3.4 | 152 / 174 |
| Defense allowed | 59.1% | 58.6% | +0.4 | 176 / 211 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Central Michigan.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 174 | 99% | 8.9 | 5.6 | 58.0% | 0.01 | -3.4 pp | 152 |
| Passing defense | 211 | 99% | 9.6 | 4.7 | 58.8% | 0.17 | +0.4 pp | 176 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 305 | 4.5 | 46.5% | 0.19 | 3.40 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 11.7% | 81.4% |
| Defense allowed | 302 | 4.7 | 51.2% | 0.19 | 3.60 | 1.30 | 0.70 | 12.3% | 84.2% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 297 / 305 | 290 | 15 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 280 / 282 · 99.3% |
| Defense allowed | 294 / 302 | 291 | 11 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 285 / 285 · 100.0% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.4 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | New Mexico | 16 | 16 | 43.8% | 61.1% | -17.3 pp | 11.0 | -0.43 | 32 | 3.7 | 0.16 |
| W2 | Colgate | 21 | 0 | — | — | — | 9.0 | -0.54 | 42 | 4.8 | 0.24 |
| W3 | Wyoming | 7 | 7 | 57.1% | 70.9% | -13.7 pp | 2.0 | -0.05 | 59 | 5.8 | 0.36 |
| W4 | Miami | 26 | 26 | 80.8% | 69.7% | +11.1 pp | 5.4 | 0.20 | 25 | 1.2 | -0.30 |
| W5 | Akron | 17 | 17 | 47.1% | 65.3% | -18.3 pp | 7.6 | 0.35 | 45 | 7.5 | 0.52 |
| W6 | Ohio | 24 | 24 | 70.8% | 62.4% | +8.4 pp | 9.2 | 0.31 | 32 | 3.8 | 0.02 |
| W7 | Western Michigan | 32 | 31 | 48.4% | 60.8% | -12.4 pp | 9.8 | -0.18 | 41 | 3.6 | 0.10 |
| W8 | Miami (OH) | 31 | 31 | 58.1% | 56.1% | +2.0 pp | 11.9 | 0.23 | 29 | 2.5 | -0.10 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
37 punts · 43.8 gross yards/punt · 35.4 net yards/punt
8 inside the 20 · 4 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 37/37 punts. Known net yards: 32/37 punts.
Our punt returns
6 returns · 5.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 6/6 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 · Miami (OH) | 5 | 43.0 | 31.8 | 5/5 |
| Week 7 · Western Michigan | 3 | 43.7 | 43.3 | 3/3 |
| Week 6 · Ohio | 6 | 46.0 | 40.4 | 5/6 |
| Week 5 · Akron | 4 | 46.0 | 37.0 | 3/4 |
| Week 4 · Miami | 5 | 46.2 | 34.3 | 4/5 |