Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

California

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

California's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 113 across 8 systems; best 91, worst 133, so they disagree by 42 places.

Lab EPA
#131
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#108
down 102026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#102
down 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#118
down 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#91
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#133
down 1 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#102
down 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#131
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#88 of 138
Schedule strength
#50 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#65 of 138
Game control
#94 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#96 of 138
Offense
#82 of 138
Defense
#106 of 138
Special teams
#50 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

California · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.180 net EPA/play

#131

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-7.10 points

#108 · Down 10 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -10.13 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +1.43, schedule #33 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +4.95. That is worth -8.70 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.46 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -7.10.

How each game enters this SRS rating

California · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · UCLA
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401858210
-21.00 → -21.00-2.500.76378.47%+12.00-1.9901.016-0.974
Week 2 · Syracuse
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858216
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.79378.80%-1.040.484-0.0920.392
Week 3 · Wagner
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858233
+42.00 → +35.00-2.500.82499.15%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.973-2.2870.686
Week 4 · Clemson
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858234
-14.00 → -14.00-2.500.85729.51%+1.52-1.5680.145-1.424
Week 5 · UNLV
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858247
-8.00 → -8.00+2.500.89099.88%-0.87-0.543-0.086-0.629
Week 6 · Virginia Tech
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858259
+5.00 → +5.00-2.500.925910.27%+2.560.2570.2630.519
Week 7 · Wake Forest
home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401858269
-34.00 → -34.00-2.500.962210.67%+12.07-3.8941.288-2.607
Week 8 · SMU
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858270
-39.00 → -35.00+2.501.000011.09%+7.81-3.6040.866-2.737

Game terms -6.77 points; prior term -0.32 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -7.10 points. The preseason prior is -1.46 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.7 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-8.2 SP+ points

#102 · Down 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-19.17 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#133 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -10.54 on 451 plays; defense 8.63 on 410 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks California 23 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 2-3 · home 2-3 · away 1-2 · expected wins 2.2
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-6 ATS (-9.3 avg) · 2025: 5-8 ATS (-3.0 avg)
Head coach
Tosh Lupoi · hired 2025-12-04 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #55 (190 pts) · 2025 #69 (180 pts) · 2026 #56 (203 pts)
Returning
58% of production · 53% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing89%97%
Receiving43%31%
Rushing0%14%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back83.130.86596.93
Defensive Line142.930.846211.85
Linebacker63.000.86415.18
Offensive Line123.170.867210.41
Quarterback43.000.86133.45
Receiver93.330.87897.91
Running Back43.000.87723.51
Special Teams92.780.83237.49

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele · QB

CFBD athlete 5164313. California (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.26519946.8%
Pass 72.7% · Rush 4.4%

1st 41.2% · 2nd 49.1% · 3rd 58.3%

Standard downs 41.8% · Passing downs 56.0%

Not linked
Jackson Brousseau · QB

CFBD athlete 5054036. California (2026–2026); Colorado State (2023–2025)

Passing WEPA0.21711533.5%
Pass 50.2% · Rush 5.1%

1st 28.7% · 2nd 32.2% · 3rd 42.7%

Standard downs 28.9% · Passing downs 42.6%

2023: 3★ · 0.8436
Ashten Emory · RB

CFBD athlete 5192899. California (2026–2026); UTEP (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.0377116.7%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 35.2%

1st 17.8% · 2nd 17.7% · 3rd 13.7%

Standard downs 18.2% · Passing downs 13.7%

2024: 3★ · 0.8156
Adam Mohammed · RB

CFBD athlete 5147861. California (2026–2026); Washington (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1396032.7%
Pass 12.3% · Rush 61.5%

1st 41.7% · 2nd 30.8% · 3rd 19.3%

Standard downs 40.5% · Passing downs 17.2%

Not linked
Towns McGough · PK

CFBD athlete 5192416. Auburn (2024–2025); California (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.9809—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 3★ · 0.8467
Chase Meyer · PK

CFBD athlete 5084425. California (2025–2026); Tulsa (2023–2023); Penn State (2024–2024); Pennsylvania (2022–2022)

Kicker PAAR-2.2804—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2022: stars unavailable
Anthony League · RB

CFBD athlete 5164327. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 8.2%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 8.3% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Carson Perry-Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 5218743. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 2.1% · Rush 9.9%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Carter Vargas · RB

CFBD athlete 5148905. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.0%
Pass 8.7% · Rush 10.3%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 7.4% · 3rd 18.2%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 15.2%

Not linked
Chase Hendricks · WR

CFBD athlete 4921110. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.5%
Pass 20.0% · Rush 0.5%

1st 10.7% · 2nd 10.5% · 3rd 19.4%

Standard downs 12.1% · Passing downs 13.2%

Not linked
Cole Boscia · WR

CFBD athlete 5082662. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.1%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked
Cooper Perry · WR

CFBD athlete 5141597. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.6% · 2nd 6.9% · 3rd 6.6%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 8.8%

Not linked
Dominic Ingrassia · QB

CFBD athlete 5296106. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 8.2%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Dorian Thomas · TE

CFBD athlete 4908552. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 1.3%

1st 1.1% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Ian Strong · WR

CFBD athlete 5075390. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.6%
Pass 17.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 14.2% · 2nd 8.8% · 3rd 7.4%

Standard downs 11.1% · Passing downs 9.8%

Not linked
Jordan King · WR

CFBD athlete 4899704. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 5.8%

Not linked
Kyion Grayes · WR

CFBD athlete 4688541. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 7.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 8.8%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 9.4%

Not linked
Mark Hamper · WR

CFBD athlete 5165117. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 8.0%

Not linked
Mason Mini · TE

CFBD athlete 5165154. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 12.7% · Rush 1.7%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 11.3%

Standard downs 8.8% · Passing downs 7.8%

Not linked
Quaron Adams · WR

CFBD athlete 4705557. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 1.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Taimane Purcell · TE

CFBD athlete 5217177. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
Trevor Rogers · WR

CFBD athlete 5115243. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Tyree Sams · WR

CFBD athlete 5277128. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.9%
Pass 10.2% · Rush 6.5%

1st 14.8% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 3.0%

Standard downs 11.7% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 32 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
AJ Tuitele · LBUSC2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Adam Mohammed · RBWashington2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Angus Davies · PTulsa2026-01-16— / —Immediate
Ashten Emory · RBUTEP2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ashton Rivera · IOLKent State2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ashun Shepphard · DLMississippi State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carter Vargas · RBUC Davis2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Chase Hendricks · WROhio2026-01-084★ / 0.9300Immediate
Cooper Perry · WROregon2026-01-183★ / 0.8700Immediate
Daniel Harris · CBGeorgia2026-01-163★ / 0.8800Immediate
David Bird · LSAlabama2026-02-04— / —Immediate
Dorian Thomas · TENew Mexico2026-01-074★ / 0.9000Immediate
Emmanuel Okoye · EDGETennessee2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ian Strong · WRRutgers2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Jackson Brousseau · QBColorado State2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jacob Arop · OTSouth Dakota2026-01-053★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jayden Williams · DLNorth Texas2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jericho Johnson · DLOregon2026-01-194★ / 0.9000Immediate
Jimothy Lewis Jr. · OTMississippi State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joshua Pierce · EDGENorth Texas2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Justin Beadles · EDGELouisville2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kahlee Tafai · OTMinnesota2026-01-143★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kamar Mothudi · LBOregon2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kingston Lopa · SOregon2026-01-054★ / 0.9000Immediate
Marquis Groves-Killebrew · CBArizona2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Hurst · SNorthern Arizona2026-01-103★ / 0.8800Immediate
Mykeal Rabess · OTFlorida International2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ricky Fletcher · CBOle Miss2026-01-183★ / 0.8800Immediate
Rico Walker · TEPurdue2026-01-233★ / 0.8600Immediate
Solomon Williams · EDGETexas A&M2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Towns McGough · KAuburn2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Tristan Jernigan · LBTexas A&M2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 36 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Abram Murray · KUL Monroe2026-01-223★ / 0.8000Immediate
Aidan Keanaaina · DLNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Ben Marshall · TEAustin Peay2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Braden Miller · OTDuke2026-01-083★ / 0.8800Immediate
Brandon High Jr. · RBUTSA2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Brook Honore Jr. · PNot reported2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Buom Jock · LBWake Forest2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cade Uluave · LBBYU2026-01-134★ / 0.9400Immediate
Cam Sidney · SNot reported2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Withdrawn
Chase Meyer · KNot reported2026-01-13— / —Withdrawn
Curlee Thomas IV · EDGENorth Texas2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Daveion Harley · IOLFlorida International2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Dazmin James · WRApp State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Devin Brown · QBWeber State2026-01-164★ / —Immediate
EJ Caminong · QBNot reported2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Withdrawn
Eze Osondu · LBUTSA2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Harrison Taggart · LBUtah State2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ike Okafor · DLWashington State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jacob Houseworth · TEUC Davis2026-01-233★ / —Immediate
Jaiven Plummer · WRGeorgia Tech2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jayden Dixon-Veal · WRNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Jordan Spasojevic-Moko · IOLNot reported2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Kaden Cook · CBJacksonville State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kendrick Raphael · RBSMU2026-01-134★ / 0.9200Immediate
Lajuan Owens · IOLCentral Arkansas2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Landon Morris · TEWake Forest2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Leon Bell · OTColorado2026-01-173★ / 0.8900Immediate
Luke Ferrelli · LBOle Miss2026-01-214★ / 0.9000Immediate
Michael Kern · PNew Mexico2026-02-023★ / —Immediate
Nate Burrell · DLNot reported2026-01-053★ / —Withdrawn
Nick Morrow · OTKansas2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Rino Monteforte · LSKansas2026-01-092★ / —Immediate
Ryan McCulloch · EDGEUCLA2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Syris Corley · OTNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
TJ Bush Jr. · EDGEMinnesota2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tyson Ford · DLUCLA2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at California. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Tosh Lupoi · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 22 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Tosh Lupoi · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Nick Rolovich · interim

    1–1 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-11-23. Effective dates: 2025-11-29 to unknown.

  3. 2017–2025 · Justin Wilcox

    48–55 · 103 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Hired 2017-01-14. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-11-29.

  4. 2013–2016 · Sonny Dykes

    19–30 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2002–2012 · Jeff Tedford

    82–57 · 139 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Hired 2001-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1997–2001 · Tom Holmoe

    16–39 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1996–1996 · Steve Mariucci

    6–6 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1992–1995 · Keith Gilbertson

    20–26 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1987–1991 · Bruce Snyder

    29–24–4 · 57 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1982–1986 · Joe Kapp

    20–34–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1978–1981 · Roger Theder

    17–28 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1972–1977 · Mike White

    34–31–1 · 66 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1964–1971 · Ray Willsey

    40–42–1 · 83 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1960–1963 · Marv Levy

    8–29–3 · 40 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1957–1959 · Pete Elliott

    10–21 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1947–1956 · Pappy Waldorf

    67–32–4 · 103 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1946–1946 · Frank Wickhorst

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1945–1945 · Buck Shaw

    4–5–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1935–1944 · Stub Allison

    58–42–2 · 102 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1931–1934 · William Ingram

    27–14–4 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1926–1930 · Nibs Price

    27–17–3 · 47 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1916–1925 · Andy Smith

    74–16–7 · 97 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Tosh Lupoi · incomplete attribution0–0——-6.2-8.456—
2025 · Nick Rolovich1–11–00–1-3.2-4.169—
2025 · Justin Wilcox6–53–40–0-3.2-4.169—
2024 · Justin Wilcox6–72–60–141.855—
2023 · Justin Wilcox6–74–50–1-0.14.379—
2022 · Justin Wilcox4–82–70–0-3-1.359—
2021 · Justin Wilcox5–74–50–03.43.628—
2020 · Justin Wilcox1–31–30–02.4—39—
2019 · Justin Wilcox8–54–51–0-2.64.243—
2018 · Justin Wilcox7–64–50–13.90.342—
2017 · Justin Wilcox5–72–70–0-11.970—
2016 · Sonny Dykes5–73–60–02.4231—
2015 · Sonny Dykes8–54–51–012.11134—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-24 19:36:19 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play125 / 1389.5114 / 13817.5
Success rateT122 / 13811.360 / 13856.9
Explosiveness73 / 13847.4132 / 1384.4
Standard-down success121 / 13812.457 / 13859.1
Passing-down success107 / 13822.660 / 13856.9
Pass PPA111 / 13819.777 / 13844.5
Rush PPA131 / 1385.1133 / 1383.6
Pass explosiveness98 / 13829.2128 / 1387.3
Rush explosiveness113 / 13818.2130 / 1385.8
Line yards135 / 1382.2125 / 1389.5
Second-level yards127 / 1388.0110 / 13820.4
Open-field yards134 / 1382.9131 / 1385.1
Stuff rate129 / 1386.6121 / 13812.4
Power success136 / 1381.5125 / 1389.5
HavocT123 / 13810.6T130 / 1385.5
Front-seven havocT108 / 13820.8125 / 1389.5
DB havocT108 / 13820.4T114 / 13816.4
Points / opportunity126 / 1388.8113 / 13818.2
Average field positionT125 / 1389.1T128 / 1386.9
Field-position expected points128 / 1387.3133 / 1383.6

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele · QBUsage 46.8% · Avg PPA 0.068 · Total 15.899
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.06815.89946.8%
Pass0.12928.90172.7%
Rush-0.785-6.2774.4%
1st down0.0423.69541.2%
2nd down0.1048.10749.1%
3rd down0.40525.53058.3%
Standard downs-0.026-3.51241.8%
Passing downs0.19819.41156.0%
Jackson Brousseau · QBUsage 33.5% · Avg PPA 0.047 · Total 6.074
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0476.07433.5%
Pass0.0485.89350.2%
Rush0.0260.1825.1%
1st down-0.025-1.18628.7%
2nd down0.0642.49232.2%
3rd down0.52518.36842.7%
Standard downs-0.062-4.60428.9%
Passing downs0.19410.67842.6%
Adam Mohammed · RBUsage 32.7% · Avg PPA 0.201 · Total 18.309
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.20118.30932.7%
Pass0.4879.25412.3%
Rush0.1269.05461.5%
1st down-0.011-0.55341.7%
2nd down0.40811.41630.8%
3rd down0.7157.86019.3%
Standard downs0.23217.37440.5%
Passing downs0.0580.93517.2%
Ashten Emory · RBUsage 16.7% · Avg PPA -0.093 · Total -8.841
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.093-8.84116.7%
Pass0.0491.0286.0%
Rush-0.133-9.86935.2%
1st down-0.026-1.13117.8%
2nd down-0.113-3.62917.7%
3rd down0.1773.00213.7%
Standard downs-0.102-6.93818.2%
Passing downs-0.070-1.90313.7%
Chase Hendricks · WRUsage 12.5% · Avg PPA 0.269 · Total 19.116
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.26919.11612.5%
Pass0.28620.02020.0%
Rush-0.903-0.9030.5%
1st down0.50113.02210.7%
2nd down0.1242.35110.5%
3rd down0.50312.06819.4%
Standard downs0.2119.48212.1%
Passing downs0.3719.63413.2%
Ian Strong · WRUsage 10.6% · Avg PPA 0.261 · Total 13.858
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.26113.85810.6%
Pass0.26113.85817.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1654.96114.2%
2nd down0.3985.5778.8%
3rd down0.8686.9457.4%
Standard downs0.2037.31711.1%
Passing downs0.3856.5419.8%
Carter Vargas · RBUsage 9.0% · Avg PPA -0.252 · Total -2.017
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.252-2.0179.0%
Pass-0.552-2.2108.7%
Rush0.0480.19310.3%
1st down-0.682-1.3655.4%
2nd down-0.649-1.2987.4%
3rd down0.1620.64718.2%
Standard downs-0.625-1.8745.4%
Passing downs-0.029-0.14315.2%
Tyree Sams · WRUsage 8.9% · Avg PPA -0.324 · Total -8.419
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.324-8.4198.9%
Pass-0.207-4.14410.2%
Rush-0.713-4.2756.5%
1st down-0.173-3.10914.8%
2nd down-0.179-0.8935.6%
3rd down-0.170-0.3403.0%
Standard downs-0.356-7.82411.7%
Passing downs-0.149-0.5953.8%
Mason Mini · TEUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.218 · Total 9.136
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2189.1368.4%
Pass0.1656.44012.7%
Rush0.8992.6961.7%
1st down-0.097-1.5517.7%
2nd down0.5466.5547.7%
3rd down0.6388.29411.3%
Standard downs0.1113.1198.8%
Passing downs0.4306.0177.8%
Anthony League · RBUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA -0.352 · Total -7.033
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.352-7.0335.2%
Pass-0.019-0.1673.7%
Rush-0.624-6.8668.2%
1st down-0.307-2.1514.3%
2nd down-0.525-5.2468.3%
3rd down0.1220.3653.7%
Standard downs-0.118-1.6475.6%
Passing downs-0.898-5.3864.5%
Kyion Grayes · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.487 · Total 6.815
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4876.8154.9%
Pass0.4876.8157.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.672-2.0172.4%
2nd down1.3536.7645.4%
3rd down-0.341-1.7038.8%
Standard downs-0.205-1.0272.7%
Passing downs0.8717.8439.4%
Taimane Purcell · TEUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.388 · Total 9.694
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3889.6944.9%
Pass0.3889.6947.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2622.8865.0%
2nd down0.6064.8494.9%
3rd down0.8183.2703.6%
Standard downs0.4215.9004.2%
Passing downs0.3453.7946.1%
Carson Perry-Smith · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA 0.427 · Total 5.974
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4275.9744.8%
Pass2.0598.2352.1%
Rush-0.226-2.2629.9%
1st down-0.124-0.7414.8%
2nd down-0.259-1.5526.5%
3rd down4.1338.2673.3%
Standard downs0.0450.4505.2%
Passing downs1.3815.5244.1%
Cooper Perry · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.348 · Total 5.220
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3485.2204.2%
Pass0.3485.2206.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.831-0.8310.6%
2nd down0.7916.3326.9%
3rd down0.7093.5476.6%
Standard downs0.3821.5261.7%
Passing downs0.3363.6948.8%
Jordan King · WRUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.356 · Total 6.049
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3566.0494.0%
Pass0.3566.0496.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.237-1.1842.8%
2nd down0.5442.7203.7%
3rd down0.6454.5147.9%
Standard downs0.3122.8043.2%
Passing downs0.4063.2455.8%
Mark Hamper · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.936 · Total 5.616
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9365.6163.9%
Pass0.9365.6165.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0380.0762.9%
2nd down1.2322.4654.0%
3rd down1.5383.0757.1%
Standard downs0.0380.0761.9%
Passing downs1.3855.5408.0%
Dominic Ingrassia · QBUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.364 · Total 1.456
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3641.4563.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3641.4568.2%
1st down-0.046-0.0462.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.216-0.4336.9%
Standard downs-0.160-0.4793.7%
Passing downs1.9351.9352.3%
Trevor Rogers · WRUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -1.356 · Total -5.424
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.356-5.4242.9%
Pass-1.356-5.4244.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.145-0.1451.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.600-1.2006.3%
Standard downs-2.112-4.2232.2%
Passing downs-0.600-1.2004.0%
Dorian Thomas · TEUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.054 · Total 0.272
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0540.2722.5%
Pass-0.943-3.7703.5%
Rush4.0424.0421.3%
1st down0.3940.3941.1%
2nd down-0.019-0.0383.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.081-3.2442.1%
Passing downs1.7583.5163.4%
EJ Caminong · QBUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.602 · Total 0.602
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6020.6021.5%
Pass0.6020.6022.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6020.6023.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.6020.6022.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Quaron Adams · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.598 · Total -1.196
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.598-1.1961.3%
Pass-0.598-1.1961.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.654-0.6541.6%
2nd down-0.542-0.5422.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.654-0.6541.1%
Passing downs-0.542-0.5421.7%
Cole Boscia · WRUsage 1.1% · Avg PPA -0.299 · Total -0.299
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.299-0.2991.1%
Pass-0.299-0.2992.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.299-0.2993.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.299-0.2993.0%
Where California sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.018 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.379 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.233 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.086 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.083 (5th percentile; 138 teams)5thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.172 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.399 (57th percentile; 138 teams)57thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.400 (4th percentile; 138 teams)4thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.119 (5th percentile; 138 teams)5th
Values and percentiles
California metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0189th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.37911th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.23347th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.08620th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.0835th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.17218th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.39957th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.4004th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.1195th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 99% of 342 attempts charted. Average depth of target 6.1 yards (1st percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.9 per completion. Completion 66.1%, 6.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.10.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense63.4%65.5%-2.1295 / 342
Defense allowed60.2%60.1%+0.1191 / 231

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is California.

Target mix by zone, California offense
Short left41% · 136Short middle18% · 60Short right33% · 111Deep left4% · 12Deep middle1% · 4Deep right3% · 11

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
California passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense34299%6.15.966.1%0.10-2.1 pp295
Passing defense23198%8.45.759.3%0.24+0.1 pp191

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2232.938.8%-0.022.400.800.5020.9%57.1%
Defense allowed2905.243.8%0.273.201.101.8014.0%81.6%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense218 / 223214913340203 / 206 · 98.5%
Defense allowed280 / 2902464414440268 / 272 · 98.5%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.1 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-7.5-3.01.5W1W1 vs UCLA: -6.0 ppW2W2 vs Syracuse: -0.4 ppW3W4W4 vs Clemson: -7.5 ppW5W5 vs UNLV: -2.3 ppW6W6 vs Virginia Tech: -1.8 ppW7W7 vs Wake Forest: +1.1 ppW8W8 vs SMU: +1.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1UCLA474755.3%61.3%-6.0 pp8.3-0.01412.90.01
W2Syracuse343461.8%62.1%-0.4 pp8.60.01262.6-0.09
W3Wagner430———5.50.58284.70.27
W4Clemson303056.7%64.1%-7.5 pp7.9-0.32273.20.03
W5UNLV595863.8%66.1%-2.3 pp6.60.06233.5-0.20
W6Virginia Tech434065.0%66.8%-1.8 pp3.80.33281.9-0.03
W7Wake Forest484868.8%67.7%+1.1 pp4.5-0.20223.3-0.03
W8SMU383871.1%69.5%+1.5 pp3.90.34281.2-0.22

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

39 punts · 42.4 gross yards/punt · 36.0 net yards/punt

4 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 39/39 punts. Known net yards: 29/39 punts.

Our punt returns

10 returns · 6.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

3 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 10/10 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · SMU640.235.34/6
Week 7 · Wake Forest641.041.54/6
Week 6 · Virginia Tech640.234.65/6
Week 5 · UNLV746.643.67/7
Week 4 · Clemson447.55.52/4
Team style
Rating history