Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Arizona State

2026 season

Big 12
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Arizona State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 82 across 8 systems; best 62, worst 105, so they disagree by 43 places.

Lab EPA
#105
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#88
up 132026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#62
up 82026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#73
up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#66
up 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#88
up 20 · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#76
up 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#105
up 142026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#52 of 138
Schedule strength
#39 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#35 of 138
Game control
#61 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#69 of 138
Offense
#71 of 138
Defense
#52 of 138
Special teams
#109 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Arizona State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.089 net EPA/play

#105

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-2.90 points

#88 · Up 13 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -4.02 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -0.32, schedule #47 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +3.17. That is worth -4.34 on its own; the preseason prior of +1.54 still carries 25% of the weight, giving -2.90.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Arizona State · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Morgan State
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401856774
+63.00 → +35.00-2.500.76379.36%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.041-2.3390.702
Week 2 · Texas A&M
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856683
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.79379.73%+7.08-2.4800.689-1.791
Week 3 · Kansas
neutral · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856812
+7.00 → +7.000.000.824910.11%+1.010.7070.1030.810
Week 5 · Baylor
home · 2026-10-04 · ID 401856817
-36.00 → -35.00-2.500.890910.92%+5.87-4.0940.641-3.453
Week 6 · Hawai'i
home · 2026-10-11 · ID 401856808
+18.00 → +18.00-2.500.925911.34%-7.391.758-0.8390.920
Week 7 · Texas Tech
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856828
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.962211.79%+10.71-3.0061.262-1.744
Week 8 · Kansas State
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856839
+11.00 → +11.00-2.501.000012.25%+1.971.0420.2411.282

Game terms -3.27 points; prior term +0.38 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -2.90 points. The preseason prior is +1.54 with 24.51% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

2.3 SP+ points

#62 · Up 8 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-5.49 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#88 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -8.53 on 348 plays; defense -3.04 on 383 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Arizona State 17 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-3 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 0-2 · expected wins 3.2
Polls (Week 9)
unranked
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4 ATS (-5.1 avg) · 2025: 6-7 ATS (-2.4 avg)
Head coach
Kenny Dillingham · hired 2022-11-27 · 22-17 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #48 (199 pts) · 2025 #44 (203 pts) · 2026 #40 (217 pts)
Returning
16% of production · 14% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing5%0%
Receiving31%28%
Rushing-5%15%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back173.000.870014.79
Defensive Line113.090.86749.54
Linebacker63.000.86075.16
Offensive Line163.000.857713.72
Quarterback33.670.92622.78
Receiver133.150.871111.32
Running Back53.400.87984.40
Special Teams43.250.86123.44

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Cutter Boley · QB

CFBD athlete 5141378. Arizona State (2026–2026); Kentucky (2024–2025)

Passing WEPA0.20215944.3%
Pass 70.3% · Rush 14.9%

1st 41.2% · 2nd 44.0% · 3rd 54.3%

Standard downs 42.2% · Passing downs 48.7%

2024: 4★ · 0.9014
Mikey Keene · QB

CFBD athlete 4597499. Arizona State (2026–2026); Michigan (2025–2025); Fresno State (2023–2024); UCF (2021–2022)

Passing WEPA0.2856030.9%
Pass 54.5% · Rush 1.1%

1st 25.3% · 2nd 34.3% · 3rd 37.5%

Standard downs 26.2% · Passing downs 40.3%

2021: 3★ · 0.8641
Cardae Mack · RB

CFBD athlete 5209382. Arizona State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3815815.1%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 30.7%

1st 17.8% · 2nd 10.9% · 3rd 13.0%

Standard downs 17.5% · Passing downs 9.9%

2026: 4★ · 0.9066
Kyson Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 5110535. Arizona State (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0775515.3%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 27.6%

1st 16.6% · 2nd 18.2% · 3rd 10.6%

Standard downs 17.0% · Passing downs 11.7%

2023: 3★ · 0.8575
Cutter Boley · QB

CFBD athlete 5141378. Arizona State (2026–2026); Kentucky (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1373144.3%
Pass 70.3% · Rush 14.9%

1st 41.2% · 2nd 44.0% · 3rd 54.3%

Standard downs 42.2% · Passing downs 48.7%

2024: 4★ · 0.9014
Carson Smith · PK

CFBD athlete 4872845. Arizona State (2026–2026); East Carolina (2021–2023); Austin Peay (2024–2025); South Carolina (2021–2021)

Kicker PAAR4.84010—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2021: stars unavailable
AJ Ia · TE

CFBD athlete 5141480. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 6.1%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Anthony Miller Jr. · TE

CFBD athlete 5110569. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Cory Butler Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5164354. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
David Avit · RB

CFBD athlete 5226949. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 6.3%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Demarius Robinson · RB

CFBD athlete 5216317. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.4%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Derek Eusebio · WR

CFBD athlete 5159831. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.3%
Pass 21.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 13.1% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 13.3%

Standard downs 14.7% · Passing downs 7.8%

Not linked
Grayson Rigdon · RB

CFBD athlete 5257046. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 10.9%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 8.7% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Hayden Vercher · TE

CFBD athlete 5209118. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Jake Fette · QB

CFBD athlete 5209295. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.7%
Pass 12.7% · Rush 7.0%

1st 10.8% · 2nd 6.4% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 10.2% · Passing downs 8.5%

Not linked
Jalen Moss · WR

CFBD athlete 4804883. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 6.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 7.3%

Standard downs 1.4% · Passing downs 7.2%

Not linked
James Giggey · TE

CFBD athlete 5147330. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 1.6%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jaren Hamilton · WR

CFBD athlete 5104212. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
Jason Brown Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5079348. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 14.3%

1st 7.6% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 7.2% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked
Khamari Anderson · TE

CFBD athlete 4917619. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Marquis Gillis · RB

CFBD athlete 4900771. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.5%
Pass 2.0% · Rush 14.0%

1st 9.0% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 6.4%

Standard downs 7.9% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Omarion Miller · WR

CFBD athlete 4870850. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.4%
Pass 22.3% · Rush 1.4%

1st 12.8% · 2nd 13.2% · 3rd 11.7%

Standard downs 12.2% · Passing downs 13.0%

Not linked
Raiden Vines-Bright · WR

CFBD athlete 5164362. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 7.6%

Not linked
Reed Harris · WR

CFBD athlete 5031157. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.7%
Pass 29.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 15.6% · 2nd 14.5% · 3rd 20.2%

Standard downs 14.9% · Passing downs 17.5%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 24 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anthony Miller · TETulane2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Antoine Belgrave-Shorter · SPenn State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ashton Stamps · CBLSU2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Caleb Chester · CBTexas2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carson Smith · KAustin Peay2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Chance Rucker · CBMichigan State2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cutter Boley · QBKentucky2026-01-043★ / 0.8900Immediate
David Avit · RBVillanova2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Emar'rion Winston · EDGEBaylor2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jalen Thompson · EDGEMichigan State2026-01-133★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jessiah McGrew · SFlorida International2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kristian Ingman · TEPortland State2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Luke Baklenko · OTOklahoma2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lyrik Rawls · SKansas2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Marquis Gillis · RBDelaware State2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mikey Keene · QBMichigan2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nick McLarty · POhio State2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Nigel Pringle · CBArkansas2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Omarion Miller · WRColorado2026-01-054★ / 0.9500Immediate
Owen Long · LBColorado State2026-01-094★ / 0.9100Immediate
Raiden Vines-Bright · WRWashington2026-01-043★ / 0.8900Immediate
Ramere Davis · LBNorthern Arizona2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Reed Harris · WRBoston College2026-01-084★ / 0.9400Immediate
Tana Alo-Tupuola · IOLGeorgia Tech2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 21 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adama Fall · SMontana2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Akim Lanieux · WRNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Chris Johnson II · CBMontana2026-01-183★ / —Immediate
Christian Hunt · QBNot reported2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Ian Shewell · DLSan José State2026-01-153★ / 0.8200Immediate
Jack Bal · SWashington State2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Javan Robinson · CBWisconsin2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jayden Fortier · TEStephen F. Austin2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Joey Su'a · IOLNot reported2025-12-033★ / —Immediate
Joseph McGinnis II · SNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Josh Atkins · OTMissouri2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kanye Udoh · RBLiberty2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Matt McKenzie · PKennesaw State2026-01-21— / —Immediate
Nikko Klemm · SSacramento State2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Noble Johnson · WRGeorgia Southern2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Raleek Brown · RBTexas2026-01-084★ / 0.9200Immediate
Sam Leavitt · QBLSU2026-01-125★ / 0.9800Immediate
Sean Na'a · IOLUCLA2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tate Romney · LBOklahoma State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tony-Louis Nkuba · SNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Zechariah Sample · WRTexas State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Arizona State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Kenny Dillingham · career 22–17 across 4 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 20 appointments
  1. 2023–present · Kenny Dillingham · active at capture

    22–17 · 39 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2022-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2022–2022 · Shaun Aguano · interim

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2022-09-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2022 · Herm Edwards

    26–20 · 46 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2012–2017 · Todd Graham

    46–32 · 78 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2011-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2007–2011 · Dennis Erickson

    31–31 · 62 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2001–2006 · Dirk Koetter

    40–34 · 74 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1992–2000 · Bruce Snyder

    58–45 · 103 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1988–1991 · Larry Marmie

    22–21–1 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1985–1987 · John Cooper

    25–9–2 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1980–1984 · Darryl Rogers

    37–18–1 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1958–1979 · Frank Kush

    176–54–1 · 231 attributed games · 22 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1955–1957 · Dan Devine

    27–3–1 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1952–1954 · Clyde Smith

    15–13–1 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1951–1951 · Larry Siemering

    6–3–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1947–1950 · Edward Doherty

    25–17 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1946–1946 · Steve Coutchie

    2–7–2 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1942–1942 · Hilman Walker

    2–8 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1938–1941 · Dixie Howell

    23–15–4 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1933–1937 · Rudy Lavik

    13–26–3 · 42 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1931–1932 · Ted Shipkey

    10–5–1 · 16 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Kenny Dillingham · incomplete attribution0–0——0.6-1.640—
2025 · Kenny Dillingham8–56–30–13.95.844—
2024 · Kenny Dillingham11–38–20–19.413.4487
2023 · Kenny Dillingham3–92–70–0-11.3-4.544—
2022 · Herm Edwards · incomplete attribution1–2——-4.1-3.9103—
2022 · Shaun Aguano · incomplete attribution2–7——-4.1-3.9103—
2021 · Herm Edwards8–56–30–111.88.648—
2020 · Herm Edwards2–22–20–011.4—24—
2019 · Herm Edwards8–54–51–06.35.728—
2018 · Herm Edwards7–65–40–154.436—
2017 · Todd Graham7–66–30–112.632—
2016 · Todd Graham5–72–70–0-3-2.124—
2015 · Todd Graham6–74–50–110.26.919—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 13:23:29 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play107 / 13822.672 / 13848.2
Success rate74 / 13846.758 / 13858.4
Explosiveness63 / 13854.766 / 13852.6
Standard-down success87 / 13837.262 / 13855.5
Passing-down success50 / 13864.263 / 13854.7
Pass PPA103 / 13825.556 / 13859.9
Rush PPA89 / 13835.874 / 13846.7
Pass explosiveness94 / 13832.120 / 13886.1
Rush explosiveness57 / 13859.183 / 13840.1
Line yards86 / 13838.073 / 13847.4
Second-level yards20 / 13886.162 / 13855.5
Open-field yards49 / 13865.0120 / 13813.1
Stuff rate105 / 13824.197 / 13829.9
Power successT91 / 13833.6T40 / 13869.7
HavocT121 / 13812.0T53 / 13860.9
Front-seven havocT97 / 13829.6T88 / 13835.4
DB havocT121 / 13811.720 / 13886.1
Points / opportunity75 / 13846.058 / 13858.4
Average field positionT79 / 13840.5T134 / 1382.6
Field-position expected points88 / 13836.5134 / 1382.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Cutter Boley · QBUsage 44.3% · Avg PPA 0.105 · Total 22.427
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.10522.42744.3%
Pass0.16830.27970.3%
Rush-0.095-3.14214.9%
1st down0.12911.22041.2%
2nd down0.29220.47244.0%
3rd down-0.032-1.65354.3%
Standard downs0.07911.01242.2%
Passing downs0.15211.41548.7%
Mikey Keene · QBUsage 30.9% · Avg PPA 0.139 · Total 9.313
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1399.31330.9%
Pass0.1499.80854.5%
Rush-0.496-0.4961.1%
1st down0.2145.13825.3%
2nd down-0.141-3.37534.3%
3rd down0.6359.52037.5%
Standard downs0.2188.27126.2%
Passing downs0.0361.04140.3%
Reed Harris · WRUsage 15.7% · Avg PPA 0.674 · Total 51.246
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.67451.24615.7%
Pass0.67451.24629.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.73624.30115.6%
2nd down0.47110.83314.5%
3rd down0.69013.10820.2%
Standard downs0.60129.46514.9%
Passing downs0.80721.78117.5%
Kyson Brown · RBUsage 15.3% · Avg PPA -0.010 · Total -0.749
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.010-0.74915.3%
Pass-0.001-0.0115.1%
Rush-0.012-0.73827.6%
1st down-0.080-2.81216.6%
2nd down0.1444.17318.2%
3rd down-0.211-2.11110.6%
Standard downs-0.045-2.54817.0%
Passing downs0.1001.79911.7%
Cardae Mack · RBUsage 15.1% · Avg PPA 0.479 · Total 30.160
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47930.16015.1%
Pass0.4553.6383.4%
Rush0.48226.52230.7%
1st down0.39913.16817.8%
2nd down0.81212.18510.9%
3rd down0.7237.22613.0%
Standard downs0.41220.58017.5%
Passing downs0.7379.5799.9%
Omarion Miller · WRUsage 12.4% · Avg PPA 0.110 · Total 6.586
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1106.58612.4%
Pass0.20011.39122.3%
Rush-1.602-4.8051.4%
1st down0.2967.99912.8%
2nd down0.2876.02213.2%
3rd down-0.305-3.35711.7%
Standard downs0.1907.58212.2%
Passing downs-0.050-0.99613.0%
Derek Eusebio · WRUsage 12.3% · Avg PPA 0.212 · Total 3.819
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2123.81912.3%
Pass0.2123.81921.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1781.42513.1%
2nd down-0.213-1.06510.4%
3rd down0.3121.24713.3%
Standard downs0.3324.64614.7%
Passing downs-0.207-0.8287.8%
Jake Fette · QBUsage 9.7% · Avg PPA -0.372 · Total -5.211
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.372-5.2119.7%
Pass-0.215-1.93112.7%
Rush-0.656-3.2807.0%
1st down-0.237-1.66210.8%
2nd down0.1780.5336.4%
3rd down-0.406-1.21711.5%
Standard downs-0.113-1.12810.2%
Passing downs-1.021-4.0838.5%
Jason Brown Jr. · RBUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.189 · Total 2.080
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1892.0807.6%
Pass-0.366-0.7312.5%
Rush0.3122.81114.3%
1st down-0.059-0.2947.6%
2nd down-0.127-0.5108.5%
3rd down1.4422.8838.0%
Standard downs-0.218-1.5287.2%
Passing downs0.9023.6078.3%
Marquis Gillis · RBUsage 7.5% · Avg PPA -0.174 · Total -6.257
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.174-6.2577.5%
Pass-0.462-2.3092.0%
Rush-0.127-3.94814.0%
1st down-0.219-4.1569.0%
2nd down0.1281.2786.3%
3rd down0.1941.1666.4%
Standard downs-0.387-10.0677.9%
Passing downs0.3813.8106.5%
Grayson Rigdon · RBUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 1.040 · Total 9.361
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0409.3616.7%
Pass5.42810.8562.9%
Rush-0.214-1.49510.9%
1st down-0.012-0.0496.3%
2nd down0.7282.9109.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.25710.0558.7%
Passing downs-0.694-0.6942.3%
Demarius Robinson · RBUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.560 · Total 2.239
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5602.2395.6%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5602.23911.4%
1st down-0.146-0.1462.9%
2nd down0.3140.6279.1%
3rd down1.7581.75810.0%
Standard downs0.6762.0286.0%
Passing downs0.2110.2114.8%
Raiden Vines-Bright · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA -0.221 · Total -3.974
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.221-3.9744.3%
Pass-0.221-3.9747.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.492-2.9543.2%
2nd down0.8057.2426.5%
3rd down-0.372-0.3721.3%
Standard downs-0.320-2.5612.8%
Passing downs-0.141-1.4127.6%
David Avit · RBUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.550 · Total 3.299
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5503.2994.1%
Pass0.3590.7182.5%
Rush0.6452.5816.3%
1st down0.1690.3383.0%
2nd down-0.186-0.3724.3%
3rd down1.3191.3194.0%
Standard downs0.7842.3523.1%
Passing downs0.3160.9476.3%
Jalen Moss · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 1.085 · Total 7.593
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0857.5933.3%
Pass1.0857.5936.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9051.8102.2%
2nd down0.1280.2563.0%
3rd down1.8425.5277.3%
Standard downs0.9051.8101.4%
Passing downs1.1575.7837.2%
Cory Butler Jr. · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.305 · Total 2.133
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3052.1333.2%
Pass0.3052.1336.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5181.0362.1%
2nd down0.5231.5694.2%
3rd down-0.236-0.4724.9%
Standard downs0.5212.6053.4%
Passing downs-0.236-0.4722.7%
AJ Ia · TEUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.537 · Total 3.759
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5373.7592.5%
Pass0.5373.7594.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.423-0.8471.6%
2nd down1.5263.0522.2%
3rd down0.5181.5546.1%
Standard downs-0.191-0.5741.5%
Passing downs1.0834.3334.8%
Khamari Anderson · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.398 · Total 1.398
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.3981.3981.6%
Pass1.3981.3982.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3981.3983.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.3981.3982.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
James Giggey · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -1.606 · Total -3.212
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.606-3.2121.5%
Pass1.0601.0601.4%
Rush-4.272-4.2721.6%
1st down1.0601.0601.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.606-3.2122.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jaren Hamilton · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.291 · Total -0.583
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.291-0.5831.5%
Pass-0.291-0.5832.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.656-0.6561.6%
2nd down0.0730.0732.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.656-0.6561.0%
Passing downs0.0730.0733.2%
Anthony Miller Jr. · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.114 · Total -0.114
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.114-0.1141.4%
Pass-0.114-0.1142.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.114-0.1143.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.114-0.1142.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Hayden Vercher · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -2.865 · Total -2.865
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-2.865-2.8651.4%
Pass-2.865-2.8652.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-2.865-2.8654.8%
Where Arizona State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.053 (23rd percentile; 138 teams)23rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.426 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.246 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.106 (26th percentile; 138 teams)26thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.057 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.073 (48th percentile; 138 teams)48thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.398 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.213 (53rd percentile; 138 teams)53rdDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.166 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61st
Values and percentiles
Arizona State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.05323rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.42647th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.24655th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.10626th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.05736th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.07348th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.39858th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.21353rd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16661st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 100% of 243 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.1 yards (29th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.4 per completion. Completion 61.3%, 7.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.17.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense59.7%61.3%-1.6206 / 243
Defense allowed59.2%59.4%-0.2218 / 244

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Arizona State.

Target mix by zone, Arizona State offense
Short left37% · 87Short middle13% · 32Short right39% · 92Deep left5% · 13Deep middle2% · 4Deep right4% · 10

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Arizona State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense243100%8.16.461.3%0.17-1.6 pp206
Passing defense24499%9.13.557.8%0.19-0.2 pp218

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2354.343.5%0.133.301.301.4016.3%70.0%
Defense allowed2284.240.8%0.072.900.901.4015.6%66.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense233 / 235226919771209 / 209 · 100.0%
Defense allowed223 / 228220814330211 / 211 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -1.6 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-12.7-2.38.0W1W2W2 vs Texas A&M: -0.9 ppW3W3 vs Kansas: -12.3 ppW5W5 vs Baylor: -2.1 ppW6W6 vs Hawai'i: +3.8 ppW7W7 vs Texas Tech: +8.0 ppW8W8 vs Kansas State: -12.7 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Morgan State360———5.20.87357.10.60
W2Texas A&M343363.6%64.6%-0.9 pp6.7-0.30294.0-0.33
W3Kansas232347.8%60.1%-12.3 pp10.7-0.09433.2-0.02
W5Baylor444459.1%61.2%-2.1 pp8.0-0.06303.10.01
W6Hawai'i313167.7%63.9%+3.8 pp6.40.26307.70.42
W7Texas Tech444468.2%60.2%+8.0 pp9.50.25281.3-0.15
W8Kansas State313145.2%57.8%-12.7 pp11.20.16403.70.27

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

31 punts · 40.9 gross yards/punt · 33.5 net yards/punt

2 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 31/31 punts. Known net yards: 26/31 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 8.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Kansas State742.134.34/7
Week 7 · Texas Tech343.335.73/3
Week 6 · Hawai'i534.841.34/5
Week 5 · Baylor340.736.73/3
Week 3 · Kansas942.428.38/9
Team style
Rating history