Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Arizona

2026 season

Big 12
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Arizona's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 14 across 8 systems; best 8, worst 23, so they disagree by 15 places.

Lab EPA
#14
Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#13
up 92026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#14
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#15
up 112026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#23
up 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#8
no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#18
up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#14
up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#22 of 138
Schedule strength
#76 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#40 of 138
Game control
#14 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#21 of 138
Offense
#32 of 138
Defense
#24 of 138
Special teams
#43 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Arizona · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.148 net EPA/play

#14

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

11.98 points

#13 · Up 9 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 7 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +19.50 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -4.91, schedule #94 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -2.01. That is worth +14.59 on its own; the preseason prior of +4.06 still carries 25% of the weight, giving +11.98.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Arizona · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Northern Arizona
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401856773		+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.76379.48%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.417-2.3700.047
Week 2 · BYU
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856810		-11.00 → -11.00+2.500.79379.85%+11.22-0.8371.1050.268
Week 3 · Northern Illinois
home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401856793		+25.00 → +25.00-2.500.824910.24%-21.352.304-2.1860.118
Week 4 · Washington State
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856804		+10.00 → +10.00+2.500.857210.64%-7.021.330-0.7470.583
Week 5 · Cincinnati
home · 2026-10-04 · ID 401856820		+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.890911.06%+3.522.7090.3893.098
Week 6 · West Virginia
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856823		+21.00 → +21.00+2.500.925911.49%+0.462.7010.0532.754
Week 8 · Iowa State
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856838		+36.00 → +35.00-2.501.000012.41%+0.544.0340.0674.101

Game terms +10.97 points; prior term +1.01 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +11.98 points. The preseason prior is +4.06 with 24.83% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.2 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 7 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

16.0 SP+ points

#14 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

21.54 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#8 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 11.56 on 351 plays; defense -9.98 on 375 plays.

2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Arizona 1 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-1 · conf 3-1 · home 4-0 · away 2-1 · expected wins 6.0
Polls (Week 9)
AP Top 25 #22 · Coaches Poll #21
CFP latest
not published
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4 ATS (+6.1 avg) · 2025: 8-5 ATS (+6.5 avg)
Head coach
Brent Brennan · hired 2024-01-16 · 13-12 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #85 (162 pts) · 2025 #50 (201 pts) · 2026 #42 (217 pts)
Returning
65% of production · 69% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing120%96%
Receiving44%40%
Rushing60%65%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.080.867611.28
Defensive Line142.930.845611.84
Linebacker83.130.85506.84
Offensive Line163.190.867213.88
Quarterback53.600.88834.44
Receiver133.230.874711.37
Running Back53.200.87194.36
Special Teams93.000.84907.64

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Noah Fifita · QB

CFBD athlete 4801717. Arizona (2022–2026)

Passing WEPA0.53322255.4%
Pass 93.7% · Rush 13.8%

1st 48.9% · 2nd 55.6% · 3rd 72.2%

Standard downs 50.6% · Passing downs 66.4%

2022: 3★ · 0.8737
Kedrick Reescano · RB

CFBD athlete 4899361. Arizona (2024–2026); Ole Miss (2023–2023)

Rushing WEPA0.1357017.9%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 35.5%

1st 19.0% · 2nd 17.8% · 3rd 14.4%

Standard downs 18.6% · Passing downs 16.1%

2023: 4★ · 0.9377
Michael Salgado-Medina · PK

CFBD athlete 5147689. Arizona (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR-1.19011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 3★ · 0.8203
Antwan Roberts · RB

CFBD athlete 4612624. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 0.5% · Rush 17.5%

1st 11.4% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 8.7% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Arthur Ban · TE

CFBD athlete 5146636. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Brandon Phelps · WR

CFBD athlete 5121936. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 9.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Caleb Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5214651. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 1.0%

1st 6.2% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Chris Hunter · WR

CFBD athlete 5093837. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.5%
Pass 13.6% · Rush 0.6%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 11.9%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
Cole Rusk · TE

CFBD athlete 4709804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 6.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Gio Richardson · WR

CFBD athlete 5217700. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.9%
Pass 13.5% · Rush 2.0%

1st 11.0% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 9.3% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Henry Gabalis · TE

CFBD athlete 5210412. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Isaiah Mizell · WR

CFBD athlete 5198318. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 15.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 10.2% · 3rd 10.3%

Standard downs 7.4% · Passing downs 9.5%

Not linked
Ismail Mahdi · RB

CFBD athlete 5084798. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 1.3% · Rush 19.0%

1st 14.3% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 11.3% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
Jordan Ross · WR

CFBD athlete 5079585. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Landon Kelsey · WR

CFBD athlete 5210425. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Quincy Craig · RB

CFBD athlete 4804879. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 14.3%

1st 8.6% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 7.8%

Standard downs 8.9% · Passing downs 8.1%

Not linked
R.J. Mosley · WR

CFBD athlete 5290568. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.8% · 2nd 5.7% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 4.7%

Not linked
Rodney Gallagher · WR

CFBD athlete 4870754. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 6.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 1.6%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Sawyer Anderson · QB

CFBD athlete 5158407. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 11.4% · Rush 6.0%

1st 6.7% · 2nd 9.4% · 3rd 12.2%

Standard downs 8.4% · Passing downs 9.0%

Not linked
Shane King · TE

CFBD athlete 5236393. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 6.1%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 4.7%

Not linked
Tre Spivey · WR

CFBD athlete 4891198. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 15.2% · Rush 1.3%

1st 6.7% · 2nd 8.9% · 3rd 13.4%

Standard downs 7.3% · Passing downs 11.6%

Not linked
Tyler Powell · TE

CFBD athlete 4816108. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 10.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 7.0%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Wesley Yarbrough · RB

CFBD athlete 5207893. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 1.0% · Rush 9.8%

1st 4.6% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 4.5% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Xavier Jordan · WR

CFBD athlete 5123193. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 22 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Antwan Roberts Jr. · RBMarshall2026-01-143★ / 0.8700Immediate
Arthur Ban · TESan Diego State2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cam Chapa · SNorthern Colorado2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Carter Schwartz · PLouisville2026-02-05— / —Immediate
Cole Rusk · TEIllinois2026-01-064★ / 0.9100Immediate
Cooper Blomstrom · EDGEGeorgetown2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
DJ Jordan · WRUSC2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Daylen Austin · SOregon2026-01-163★ / 0.8900Immediate
Dwight Bootle II · CBCharlotte2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Everett Roussaw Jr. · LBMemphis2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jake Griffin · OTBYU2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jordan Ross · WRColorado State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Lee Molette III · SUConn2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Malcolm Hartzog · SNebraska2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Matai Tagoa'i · LBUSC2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nate Hale · OTSan José State2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Rodney Gallagher III · WRWest Virginia2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Shane King · TESouthern Miss2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyrese Boss · CBWyoming2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Victory Johnson · EDGECal Poly2026-03-033★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zachary Henning · IOLWashington2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zuri Watson · CBHoward2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 20 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Braedyn Locke · QBTarleton State2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chancellor Owens · DLTexas State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Devin Dunn · SMontana2026-01-16— / —Immediate
Devin Hyatt · WRMiami (OH)2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Eduwa Okundaye · EDGEWashington State2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gianni Edwards · CBMontana State2026-02-023★ / —Immediate
Jack Luttrell · SAuburn2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jarra Anderson · DLSam Houston2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jeremiah Patterson · WRNot reported2026-01-022★ / —Immediate
Jordan Brown · OTGeorgia State2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jshawn Frausto-Ramos · SWashington State2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kaleb Bilal-Jones · DLIowa State2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kayden Luke · TEWest Virginia2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Keyan Burnett · TEUNLV2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Marquis Groves-Killebrew · CBCalifornia2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Michael Wooten · IOLSouth Florida2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Rex Haynes · WRUtah State2026-01-113★ / 0.8200Immediate
Siale Uluave · IOLNot reported2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Stacy Bey · LBSam Houston2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyler Prasuhn · KSan Diego State2026-01-162★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Arizona. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Brent Brennan · career 47–60 across 10 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 23 appointments

  1. 2024–present · Brent Brennan · active at capture

    13–12 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2024-01-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2023 · Jedd Fisch

    16–21 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2020-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2020 · Kevin Sumlin

    9–20 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2018-01-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2012–2017 · Rich Rodriguez

    43–35 · 78 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2011-11-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2011–2011 · Tim Kish

    3–3 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-10-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2004–2011 · Mike Stoops

    41–50 · 91 attributed games · 8 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2003-11-29. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2001–2003 · John Mackovic

    10–18 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1987–2000 · Dick Tomey

    95–64–4 · 163 attributed games · 14 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1980–1986 · Larry Smith

    48–28–3 · 79 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1977–1979 · Tony Mason

    16–18–1 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1973–1976 · Jim Young

    31–13 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1969–1972 · Bob Weber

    16–26 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1967–1968 · Darrell Mudra

    11–9–1 · 21 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1959–1966 · Jim LaRue

    41–37–2 · 80 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1957–1958 · Edward Doherty

    4–15–1 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1952–1956 · Warren Woodson

    26–22–2 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1949–1951 · Robert Winslow

    12–18–1 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1946–1948 · Miles Casteel

    15–13–3 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1939–1942 · Miles Casteel

    26–13 · 39 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1938–1938 · Orian Landreth

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1933–1937 · Tex Oliver

    32–11–4 · 47 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1932–1932 · Gus Farwick

    4–5 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1931–1931 · Fred Enke

    3–5–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Brent Brennan · incomplete attribution0–0——15.715.342—
2025 · Brent Brennan9–46–30–11212.250—
2024 · Brent Brennan4–82–70–0-2.8-3.985—
2023 · Jedd Fisch10–37–21–014.113.34011
2022 · Jedd Fisch5–73–60–0-3.2-222—
2021 · Jedd Fisch1–111–80–0-12.6-9.275—
2020 · Kevin Sumlin0–50–50–0-3.5—62—
2019 · Kevin Sumlin4–82–70–0-8-5.454—
2018 · Kevin Sumlin5–74–50–03.6-2.861—
2017 · Rich Rodriguez7–65–40–13.73.445—
2016 · Rich Rodriguez3–91–80–0-4.5-4.948—
2015 · Rich Rodriguez7–63–61–04.7-0.143—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 23:08:39 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play24 / 13883.213 / 13891.2
Success rate19 / 13886.912 / 13892.0
Explosiveness76 / 13845.3126 / 1388.8
Standard-down success37 / 13873.76 / 13896.4
Passing-down success3 / 13898.571 / 13848.9
Pass PPA20 / 13886.110 / 13893.4
Rush PPA60 / 13856.934 / 13875.9
Pass explosiveness86 / 13838.0113 / 13818.2
Rush explosiveness103 / 13825.5119 / 13813.9
Line yards37 / 13873.740 / 13871.5
Second-level yards12 / 13892.056 / 13859.9
Open-field yards79 / 13843.137 / 13873.7
Stuff rate59 / 13857.735 / 13875.2
Power successT30 / 13878.1T106 / 13822.6
HavocT49 / 13863.5T62 / 13854.7
Front-seven havocT46 / 13866.4T32 / 13877.0
DB havocT51 / 13862.0T105 / 13821.9
Points / opportunity38 / 13873.013 / 13891.2
Average field positionT71 / 13848.5T17 / 13886.9
Field-position expected points70 / 13849.613 / 13891.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Noah Fifita · QBUsage 55.4% · Avg PPA 0.419 · Total 113.045
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.419113.04555.4%
Pass0.472111.31893.7%
Rush0.38311.50513.8%
1st down0.0758.13748.9%
2nd down0.71567.25755.6%
3rd down0.57737.50772.2%
Standard downs0.23339.83950.6%
Passing downs0.73973.20666.4%
Kedrick Reescano · RBUsage 17.9% · Avg PPA 0.090 · Total 7.812
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0907.81217.9%
Pass0.2122.1194.0%
Rush0.0745.69435.5%
1st down-0.125-5.25619.0%
2nd down0.1604.81117.8%
3rd down0.7469.69514.4%
Standard downs0.0080.52318.6%
Passing downs0.3047.29016.1%
Quincy Craig · RBUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA 0.301 · Total 12.639
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.30112.6398.6%
Pass0.1951.9484.0%
Rush0.36511.31814.3%
1st down0.2845.3978.6%
2nd down0.3735.9619.5%
3rd down0.1831.2827.8%
Standard downs0.1093.2608.9%
Passing downs0.7829.3798.1%
Sawyer Anderson · QBUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA -0.241 · Total -5.547
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.241-5.5478.6%
Pass-0.531-8.50011.4%
Rush0.4222.9546.0%
1st down0.1331.0626.7%
2nd down-0.629-5.6599.4%
3rd down-0.158-0.95012.2%
Standard downs0.2323.7108.4%
Passing downs-1.322-9.2579.0%
Tre Spivey · WRUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA 1.032 · Total 31.981
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.03231.9818.6%
Pass1.10632.06815.2%
Rush-0.043-0.0871.3%
1st down0.3904.2866.7%
2nd down1.09712.0638.9%
3rd down1.73715.63213.4%
Standard downs0.61010.9817.3%
Passing downs1.61521.00011.6%
Ismail Mahdi · RBUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.378 · Total 4.537
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3784.5378.4%
Pass0.1060.1061.3%
Rush0.4034.43119.0%
1st down0.2562.30314.3%
2nd down0.6401.2814.0%
3rd down0.9540.9543.4%
Standard downs0.3644.00511.3%
Passing downs0.5320.5322.2%
Antwan Roberts · RBUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA -0.190 · Total -6.468
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.190-6.4688.0%
Pass-0.589-0.5890.5%
Rush-0.178-5.87917.5%
1st down0.0891.96311.4%
2nd down-0.703-8.4318.2%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.327-8.4958.7%
Passing downs0.2532.0276.3%
Isaiah Mizell · WRUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 1.371 · Total 46.609
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.37146.6098.0%
Pass1.37146.60915.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4004.4045.7%
2nd down1.82627.38510.2%
3rd down1.85214.82010.3%
Standard downs1.07223.5827.4%
Passing downs1.91923.0279.5%
Gio Richardson · WRUsage 7.9% · Avg PPA 0.224 · Total 3.804
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2243.8047.9%
Pass0.4426.62513.5%
Rush-1.411-2.8212.0%
1st down0.0500.54911.0%
2nd down0.3791.1384.1%
3rd down0.7062.1177.9%
Standard downs0.1572.1939.3%
Passing downs0.5371.6114.5%
Chris Hunter · WRUsage 7.5% · Avg PPA 0.213 · Total 5.752
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2135.7527.5%
Pass0.2195.70513.6%
Rush0.0470.0470.6%
1st down-0.210-2.5237.4%
2nd down-0.332-2.3275.6%
3rd down1.32510.60111.9%
Standard downs-0.226-3.8346.9%
Passing downs0.9599.5868.9%
Caleb Smith · WRUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.128 · Total 3.211
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1283.2116.0%
Pass0.1443.02910.0%
Rush0.0630.1251.0%
1st down-0.210-2.5226.2%
2nd down0.2761.6584.2%
3rd down0.5043.0267.9%
Standard downs0.1372.7406.8%
Passing downs0.0940.4714.0%
Tyler Powell · TEUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.894 · Total 10.723
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.89410.7235.4%
Pass0.89410.72310.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3781.1343.2%
2nd down0.4322.1586.3%
3rd down1.5054.5147.0%
Standard downs0.7636.8655.8%
Passing downs1.2863.8584.4%
Brandon Phelps · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.782 · Total 17.981
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.78217.9814.7%
Pass0.78217.9819.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7889.4515.4%
2nd down0.9327.4584.7%
3rd down0.3571.0723.3%
Standard downs0.78111.7204.4%
Passing downs0.7836.2615.4%
Wesley Yarbrough · RBUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.007 · Total 0.060
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0070.0604.7%
Pass-0.214-0.2141.0%
Rush0.0340.2749.8%
1st down-0.251-1.0044.6%
2nd down-0.712-1.4242.9%
3rd down0.7341.4685.9%
Standard downs0.2831.6984.5%
Passing downs-0.546-1.6385.0%
Rodney Gallagher · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA -0.150 · Total -1.804
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.150-1.8043.6%
Pass-0.150-1.8046.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3541.0622.0%
2nd down0.2391.6706.1%
3rd down-0.715-0.7151.6%
Standard downs-0.413-3.7164.0%
Passing downs0.6371.9122.9%
Cole Rusk · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 1.215 · Total 8.502
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.2158.5023.4%
Pass1.2158.5026.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0170.0332.2%
2nd down0.8262.4784.1%
3rd down2.9955.9915.3%
Standard downs0.0940.2812.1%
Passing downs2.0558.2216.3%
Shane King · TEUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.503 · Total 4.528
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5034.5283.3%
Pass0.5034.5286.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4821.9293.3%
2nd down1.4372.8742.1%
3rd down-0.092-0.2756.1%
Standard downs0.2171.0842.7%
Passing downs0.8613.4444.7%
R.J. Mosley · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.886 · Total 7.976
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8867.9763.0%
Pass0.8867.9765.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.321-0.3210.8%
2nd down0.9905.9405.7%
3rd down1.1792.3583.6%
Standard downs0.4762.3792.4%
Passing downs1.3995.5974.7%
Xavier Jordan · WRUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.024 · Total -0.143
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.024-0.1432.9%
Pass-0.024-0.1436.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.237-1.1865.3%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.0421.0422.7%
Standard downs-0.024-0.1434.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Arthur Ban · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.512 · Total -0.512
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.512-0.5121.3%
Pass-0.512-0.5122.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.512-0.5123.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.512-0.5121.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Henry Gabalis · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 3.189 · Total 3.189
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall3.1893.1891.3%
Pass3.1893.1892.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down3.1893.1893.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs3.1893.1891.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jordan Ross · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.731 · Total 0.731
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7310.7311.3%
Pass0.7310.7312.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.7310.7313.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.7310.7315.6%
Landon Kelsey · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.191 · Total 0.191
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1910.1911.3%
Pass0.1910.1912.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1910.1913.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1910.1911.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Arizona sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.244 (83rd percentile; 138 teams)83rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.491 (87th percentile; 138 teams)87thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.230 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.408 (86th percentile; 138 teams)86thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.125 (57th percentile; 138 teams)57thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.063 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91stDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.345 (92nd percentile; 138 teams)92ndDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.380 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.162 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55th
Values and percentiles
Arizona metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.24483rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.49187th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.23045th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.40886th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.12557th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.06391st138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.34592nd138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.3809th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16255th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-10-30. Offense: 98% of 240 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.3 yards (35th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.6 per completion. Completion 73.8%, 9.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.45.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense73.2%60.7%+12.5198 / 240
Defense allowed56.8%59.8%-3.0192 / 225

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.1, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.5Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.5Arizona State: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Arkansas: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.7Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.7, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.9BYU: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.4Ball State: ADOT 7.5, YAC 5.0Baylor: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.8Boise State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.3Boston College: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.5, YAC 5.9Buffalo: ADOT 9.5, YAC 2.0California: ADOT 6.1, YAC 5.9Central Michigan: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.6Charlotte: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.6Cincinnati: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.5Clemson: ADOT 6.7, YAC 5.7Coastal Carolina: ADOT 11.2, YAC 5.6Colorado: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.1, YAC 8.8Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.3Duke: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.4East Carolina: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.4, YAC 5.4Florida: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.9Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.7Florida International: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 8.5Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 7.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.5Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 5.0Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.7, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.4, YAC 5.2Iowa: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.6, YAC 4.8Kansas: ADOT 12.6, YAC 5.3Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.8, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 4.9Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.2Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.6Louisville: ADOT 9.0, YAC 7.7Marshall: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.5Maryland: ADOT 7.0, YAC 6.2Massachusetts: ADOT 10.1, YAC 4.2Memphis: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.7Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.5, YAC 6.6Michigan: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.6Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.4, YAC 6.3Mississippi State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.8Missouri: ADOT 10.4, YAC 5.2Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.7, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 14.2, YAC 8.6Nebraska: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.8Nevada: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.3New Mexico: ADOT 10.4, YAC 6.0New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.3North Carolina: ADOT 7.8, YAC 6.3North Dakota State: ADOT 10.6, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Northwestern: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 5.0Ohio: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.6Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 4.9Oklahoma: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.1Ole Miss: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.4Oregon State: ADOT 9.1, YAC 8.3Penn State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.0Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 10.9, YAC 5.2SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.9Sacramento State: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.3San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.8South Alabama: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 8.2, YAC 6.1Southern Miss: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.0Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.6Syracuse: ADOT 9.3, YAC 5.7TCU: ADOT 9.0, YAC 4.7Temple: ADOT 8.7, YAC 7.1Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.5Texas Tech: ADOT 8.8, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 8.8, YAC 6.2Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.0Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.3UCF: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5UCLA: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.0UConn: ADOT 10.8, YAC 6.5UL Monroe: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.7UNLV: ADOT 10.3, YAC 4.0USC: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0UTEP: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.2UTSA: ADOT 6.6, YAC 5.8Utah: ADOT 10.0, YAC 5.6Utah State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.7Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 8.1, YAC 6.4Washington State: ADOT 7.4, YAC 3.7West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.3Wisconsin: ADOT 6.9, YAC 7.4Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Arizona: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Arizona.

Target mix by zone, Arizona offense
Short left29% · 67Short middle17% · 39Short right39% · 89Deep left5% · 12Deep middle0% · 1Deep right9% · 21

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Arizona passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense24098%8.35.673.8%0.45+12.5 pp198
Passing defense22599%9.74.457.8%0.07-3.0 pp192

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2354.348.3%0.173.201.301.0014.2%75.8%
Defense allowed2393.136.4%0.022.600.900.7019.8%77.8%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense227 / 2352201517770210 / 211 · 99.5%
Defense allowed235 / 239232719330216 / 217 · 99.5%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +12.5 pp. 6 of 7 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

0.012.124.1W1W2W2 vs BYU: +11.5 ppW3W3 vs Northern Illinois: +24.1 ppW4W4 vs Washington State: +4.8 ppW5W5 vs Cincinnati: +5.6 ppW6W6 vs West Virginia: +13.7 ppW8W8 vs Iowa State: +16.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Northern Arizona370———5.50.22355.90.27
W2BYU313174.2%62.7%+11.5 pp8.30.24313.10.09
W3Northern Illinois373384.8%60.7%+24.1 pp8.10.59273.20.38
W4Washington State363661.1%56.3%+4.8 pp12.60.44383.90.11
W5Cincinnati373767.6%62.0%+5.6 pp6.60.42414.60.12
W6West Virginia242470.8%57.1%+13.7 pp11.70.74275.20.20
W8Iowa State383781.1%64.6%+16.5 pp6.70.56363.90.11

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

18 punts · 42.3 gross yards/punt · 38.9 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 18/18 punts. Known net yards: 15/18 punts.

Our punt returns

6 returns · 16.0 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 6/6 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 8 · Iowa State346.039.33/3
Week 6 · West Virginia336.337.01/3
Week 5 · Cincinnati142.042.01/1
Week 4 · Washington State340.037.52/3
Week 3 · Northern Illinois132.032.01/1
Team style
Rating history