Record
6-2 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
SP+ workbook recordAlabama
2026 season
SEC
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Alabama's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 4 across 8 systems; best 2, worst 7, so they disagree by 5 places.
- Lab EPA
- #3
- Through week 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #4
- down 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #7
- up 52026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #7
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #5
- up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #4
- no change · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8 · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #2
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #3
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-10-30T11:02:01.130624+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #7 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #7 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #39 of 138
- Game control
- #12 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #5 of 138
- Offense
- #6 of 138
- Defense
- #9 of 138
- Special teams
- #51 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Oct 30, 2026, 06:02:01 CDT. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Alabama · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
0.236 net EPA/play
#3
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 8. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
18.66 points
#4 · Down 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 8 · built 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +14.96 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +7.63, schedule #2 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +22.59 on its own; the preseason prior of +4.91 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +18.66.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Alabama · 2026, through CFBD Week 8. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · East Carolina home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856634 | +38.00 → +35.00 | -2.50 | 0.7637 | 8.47% | -1.32 | 2.752 | -0.112 | 2.640 |
| Week 2 · Kentucky away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856674 | +28.00 → +28.00 | +2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.80% | +8.46 | 2.684 | 0.744 | 3.428 |
| Week 3 · Florida State home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856685 | +14.00 → +14.00 | -2.50 | 0.8249 | 9.15% | +6.69 | 1.052 | 0.612 | 1.664 |
| Week 4 · South Carolina home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856696 | +31.00 → +31.00 | -2.50 | 0.8572 | 9.51% | +6.83 | 2.709 | 0.649 | 3.358 |
| Week 5 · Mississippi State away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401856707 | +33.00 → +33.00 | +2.50 | 0.8909 | 9.88% | +3.45 | 3.507 | 0.341 | 3.848 |
| Week 6 · Georgia home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856712 | -3.00 → -3.00 | -2.50 | 0.9259 | 10.27% | +15.97 | -0.565 | 1.640 | 1.075 |
| Week 7 · Tennessee away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856723 | -16.00 → -16.00 | +2.50 | 0.9622 | 10.67% | +11.95 | -1.440 | 1.275 | -0.165 |
| Week 8 · Texas A&M home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856727 | +11.00 → +11.00 | -2.50 | 1.0000 | 11.09% | +7.08 | 0.943 | 0.785 | 1.728 |
Game terms +17.58 points; prior term +1.09 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +18.66 points. The preseason prior is +4.91 with 22.18% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 8; generated 2026-10-30T11:17:06.745613+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
20.9 SP+ points
#7 · Up 5 places
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 9 · captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 9; captured 2026-10-25T21:28:39.844929+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
25.96 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#4 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 13.66 on 451 plays; defense -12.31 on 460 plays.
2026, through regular Week 8; model core-v1; captured 2026-10-30T11:02:06.855798+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Alabama 1 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 8 and 9. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 6-2 · conf 4-2 · home 4-1 · away 2-1 · expected wins 6.3
- Polls (Week 9)
- AP Top 25 #10 · Coaches Poll #10
- CFP latest
- not published
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 4-4 ATS (+5.0 avg) · 2025: 9-6 ATS (-0.9 avg)
- Head coach
- Kalen DeBoer · hired 2024-01-12 · 20-8 over 3 captured seasons
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #2 (311 pts) · 2025 #3 (298 pts) · 2026 #2 (304 pts)
- Returning
- 26% of production · 30% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing 12% 9% Receiving 41% 47% Rushing -67% 39% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-10-30. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 18 | 4.33 | 0.9609 | 17.30 |
| Defensive Line | 20 | 4.05 | 0.9412 | 18.82 |
| Linebacker | 8 | 3.75 | 0.9096 | 7.28 |
| Offensive Line | 16 | 4.00 | 0.9312 | 14.90 |
| Quarterback | 7 | 4.00 | 0.9419 | 6.59 |
| Receiver | 18 | 3.89 | 0.9242 | 16.64 |
| Running Back | 9 | 3.89 | 0.9318 | 8.39 |
| Special Teams | 5 | 3.40 | 0.8630 | 4.31 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-10-30 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keelon Russell · QBCFBD athlete 5141629. Alabama (2025–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.512 | 249 | 55.9% | Pass 97.5% · Rush 16.9%1st 47.5% · 2nd 51.8% · 3rd 83.3% Standard downs 49.7% · Passing downs 72.1% | 2025: 5★ · 0.9997 |
Daniel Hill · RBCFBD athlete 5079506. Alabama (2024–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.126 | 76 | 16.6% | Pass 5.4% · Rush 28.0%1st 18.9% · 2nd 15.9% · 3rd 10.4% Standard downs 19.7% · Passing downs 8.6% | 2024: 4★ · 0.9348 |
Trae'shawn Brown · RBCFBD athlete 5327659. Alabama (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.217 | 68 | 14.0% | Pass 3.3% · Rush 24.8%1st 18.5% · 2nd 15.2% · 3rd 2.1% Standard downs 15.8% · Passing downs 9.3% | 2026: 3★ · 0.8800 |
Keelon Russell · QBCFBD athlete 5141629. Alabama (2025–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.582 | 48 | 55.9% | Pass 97.5% · Rush 16.9%1st 47.5% · 2nd 51.8% · 3rd 83.3% Standard downs 49.7% · Passing downs 72.1% | 2025: 5★ · 0.9997 |
EJ Crowell · RBCFBD athlete 5264688. Alabama (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.321 | 36 | 7.8% | Pass 1.4% · Rush 14.0%1st 10.5% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 4.8% Standard downs 8.8% · Passing downs 5.1% | 2026: 5★ · 0.9928 |
Conor Talty · PKCFBD athlete 5081854. Alabama (2023–2026) | Kicker PAAR | 4.140 | 13 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2023: 3★ · 0.8244 |
AK Dear · RBCFBD athlete 5141426. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.3%1st 3.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Austin Mack · QBCFBD athlete 5079508. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.2% | Pass 6.7% · Rush 2.5%1st 2.9% · 2nd 6.0% · 3rd 4.2% Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 8.1% | Not linked |
Cederian Morgan · WRCFBD athlete 5209924. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.6% | Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 4.0% Standard downs 1.2% · Passing downs 2.4% | Not linked |
Danny Lewis Jr. · TECFBD athlete 4888707. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 3.3% | Not linked |
Derek Meadows · WRCFBD athlete 5143923. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.1% | Pass 6.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.2% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 3.2% Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 2.2% | Not linked |
Josh Ford · TECFBD athlete 5124338. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.4% | Pass 6.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.5% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Kaleb Edwards · TECFBD athlete 5142591. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.2% | Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.9% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 4.7% Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 3.1% | Not linked |
Kevin Riley · RBCFBD athlete 5110500. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 5.0% | Pass 1.7% · Rush 8.1%1st 4.0% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 2.1% Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 2.5% | Not linked |
Khalifa Keith · RBCFBD athlete 5078917. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.8% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.3%1st 2.7% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 6.7% Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 8.7% | Not linked |
Lotzeir Brooks · WRCFBD athlete 5141394. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.9% | Pass 15.3% · Rush 1.2%1st 4.6% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 14.6% Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 14.3% | Not linked |
Marshall Pritchett · TECFBD athlete 5164343. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.3% | Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.8%1st 4.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 6.3% Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 5.0% | Not linked |
Noah Rogers · WRCFBD athlete 4870929. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.5% | Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.7% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 1.2% · Passing downs 5.9% | Not linked |
Rico Scott · WRCFBD athlete 5079714. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 9.9% | Pass 19.4% · Rush 1.2%1st 10.1% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 11.5% Standard downs 9.0% · Passing downs 12.1% | Not linked |
Ryan Williams · WRCFBD athlete 5141711. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.9% | Pass 15.6% · Rush 1.5%1st 4.8% · 2nd 10.9% · 3rd 10.0% Standard downs 5.9% · Passing downs 13.7% | Not linked |
Transfers
Incoming · 18 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Smith · DL | Washington | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Caleb Woodson · LB | Virginia Tech | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Carmelo O'Neal · S | Mercer | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Desmond Umeozulu · EDGE | South Carolina | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8900 | Immediate |
| Devan Thompkins · DL | USC | 2026-01-07 | 4★ / 0.9400 | Immediate |
| Ethan Fields · IOL | Ole Miss | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Jayvin James · OT | Mississippi State | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8800 | Immediate |
| Josh Ford · TE | Oklahoma State | 2025-12-16 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Joshua Underwood · DL | UAB | 2026-09-09 | — / — | Immediate |
| Kaden Strayhorn · IOL | Michigan | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Kedrick Bingley-Jones · DL | Mississippi State | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Khalifa Keith · RB | App State | 2026-01-31 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Lorcan Quinn · K | Marshall | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Nick Brooks · IOL | Texas | 2026-01-14 | 4★ / 0.9200 | Immediate |
| Noah Rogers · WR | NC State | 2026-01-12 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
| Racin Delgatty · IOL | Cal Poly | 2026-01-16 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Terrance Green · DL | Oregon | 2026-01-13 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
| Ty Haywood · OT | Michigan | 2026-01-12 | 4★ / 0.9000 | Immediate |
Outgoing · 24 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aeryn Hampton · WR | Oregon State | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Arkel Anugwom · OT | Northwestern | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Cam Calhoun · CB | Ohio State | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8800 | Immediate |
| Cole Adams · WR | Vanderbilt | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| David Bird · LS | California | 2026-02-04 | — / — | Immediate |
| Isaiah Horton · WR | Texas A&M | 2026-01-11 | 4★ / 0.9600 | Immediate |
| Jalen Hale · WR | SMU | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| James Smith · DL | Ohio State | 2026-01-13 | 4★ / 0.9400 | Immediate |
| Jaylen Mbakwe · WR | Georgia Tech | 2026-01-05 | 4★ / 0.9000 | Immediate |
| Jordan Renaud · EDGE | Ole Miss | 2026-01-13 | 4★ / 0.9200 | Immediate |
| Joseph Ionata · IOL | Georgia Tech | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Kameron Howard · S | Boston College | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Kelby Collins · DL | South Carolina | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8800 | Immediate |
| Keon Keeley · DL | Notre Dame | 2026-01-12 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
| Kolby Peavy · S | Southern Miss | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Micah DeBose · IOL | Vanderbilt | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Noah Carter · EDGE | Georgia Tech | 2026-01-10 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
| Olaus Alinen · OT | Kentucky | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Peter Notaro · K | West Virginia | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| Qua Russaw · EDGE | Ohio State | 2026-01-13 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
| Richard Young · RB | Colorado | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Rico Scott · WR | Not reported | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Roq Montgomery · IOL | Western Kentucky | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Wilkin Formby · OT | Texas A&M | 2026-01-07 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Alabama. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Kalen DeBoer · career 57–17 across 7 seasons and 3 schools
Tenure timeline · 26 appointments
2024–present · Kalen DeBoer · active at capture
20–8 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons
Hired 2024-01-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2007–2023 · Nick Saban
206–29 · 235 attributed games · 17 seasons
Hired 2007-01-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2003–2006 · Mike Shula
26–24 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 2003-05-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2001–2002 · Dennis Franchione
17–8 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons
Hired 2000-11-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.
1997–2000 · Mike DuBose
24–23 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1990–1996 · Gene Stallings
70–16–1 · 87 attributed games · 7 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1987–1989 · Bill Curry
26–10 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1983–1986 · Ray Perkins
32–15–1 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1958–1982 · Bear Bryant
232–46–9 · 287 attributed games · 25 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1955–1957 · Ears Whitworth
4–24–2 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1947–1954 · Red Drew
54–28–7 · 89 attributed games · 8 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1944–1946 · Frank Thomas
22–6–2 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1931–1942 · Frank Thomas
93–18–5 · 116 attributed games · 12 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1923–1930 · Wallace Wade
61–13–3 · 77 attributed games · 8 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1919–1922 · Xen Scott
29–9–3 · 41 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1915–1917 · Thomas Kelley
17–7–1 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1914–1914 · Tubby Long
5–4 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1911–1913 · D.V. Graves
16–8–3 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1910–1910 · Guy Lowman
4–4 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1906–1909 · J.W.H. Pollard
21–4–5 · 30 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1905–1905 · Jack Leavenworth
6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1903–1904 · W.B. Blount
10–7 · 17 attributed games · 2 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1902–1902 · J.O. Heyworth
4–4 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1902–1902 · Eli Abbott
4–4 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1901–1901 · G.H. Harvey
2–1–2 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1900–1900 · M. Griffin
2–3 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Kalen DeBoer · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | 18.5 | 23.6 | 2 | — |
| 2025 · Kalen DeBoer | 11–4 | 7–1 | 1–1 | 14.8 | 12.7 | 3 | 9 |
| 2024 · Kalen DeBoer | 9–4 | 5–3 | 0–1 | 25 | 18.1 | 2 | 17 |
| 2023 · Nick Saban | 12–2 | 9–0 | 0–1 | 23.1 | 19.6 | 1 | 5 |
| 2022 · Nick Saban | 11–2 | 6–2 | 1–0 | 30.3 | 21.3 | 2 | 5 |
| 2021 · Nick Saban | 13–2 | 8–1 | 1–1 | 26 | 19.5 | 1 | 2 |
| 2020 · Nick Saban | 13–0 | 11–0 | 2–0 | 28.3 | 31.1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2019 · Nick Saban | 11–2 | 6–2 | 1–0 | 32.4 | 28.8 | 1 | 8 |
| 2018 · Nick Saban | 14–1 | 9–0 | 1–1 | 36.3 | 33.5 | 5 | — |
| 2017 · Nick Saban | 13–1 | 8–1 | 2–0 | 33.5 | 26.3 | 1 | 1 |
| 2016 · Nick Saban | 14–1 | 9–0 | 1–1 | 31.7 | 33.6 | 1 | 2 |
| 2015 · Nick Saban | 14–1 | 8–1 | 2–0 | 29 | 27.3 | 1 | 1 |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-10-26 04:10:14.047809 UTC · Source data
Stat rankings
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-25 23:16:46 UTC · calculated 2026-10-26 04:10:14 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-10-26 04:20:14 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 22 / 138 | 84.7 | 19 / 138 | 86.9 |
| Success rate | 28 / 138 | 80.3 | 29 / 138 | 79.6 |
| Explosiveness | 31 / 138 | 78.1 | 107 / 138 | 22.6 |
| Standard-down success | 25 / 138 | 82.5 | 20 / 138 | 86.1 |
| Passing-down success | 55 / 138 | 60.6 | 81 / 138 | 41.6 |
| Pass PPA | 18 / 138 | 87.6 | 58 / 138 | 58.4 |
| Rush PPA | 50 / 138 | 64.2 | 13 / 138 | 91.2 |
| Pass explosiveness | 27 / 138 | 81.0 | 103 / 138 | 25.5 |
| Rush explosiveness | 64 / 138 | 54.0 | 63 / 138 | 54.7 |
| Line yards | 70 / 138 | 49.6 | 8 / 138 | 94.9 |
| Second-level yards | 46 / 138 | 67.2 | 15 / 138 | 89.8 |
| Open-field yards | 45 / 138 | 67.9 | 64 / 138 | 54.0 |
| Stuff rate | 97 / 138 | 29.9 | 16 / 138 | 89.1 |
| Power success | T30 / 138 | 78.1 | 33 / 138 | 76.6 |
| Havoc | T110 / 138 | 19.7 | T31 / 138 | 77.4 |
| Front-seven havoc | T118 / 138 | 14.2 | T29 / 138 | 78.8 |
| DB havoc | T82 / 138 | 38.3 | T47 / 138 | 66.1 |
| Points / opportunity | 13 / 138 | 91.2 | 76 / 138 | 45.3 |
| Average field position | 10 / 138 | 93.4 | T17 / 138 | 86.9 |
| Field-position expected points | 10 / 138 | 93.4 | 12 / 138 | 92.0 |
Player PPA and usage
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
Keelon Russell · QBUsage 55.9% · Avg PPA 0.467 · Total 132.042
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.467 | 132.042 | 55.9% |
| Pass | 0.437 | 103.244 | 97.5% |
| Rush | 0.922 | 39.627 | 16.9% |
| 1st down | 0.362 | 40.919 | 47.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.313 | 26.629 | 51.8% |
| 3rd down | 0.665 | 53.182 | 83.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.375 | 68.210 | 49.7% |
| Passing downs | 0.632 | 63.833 | 72.1% |
Daniel Hill · RBUsage 16.6% · Avg PPA 0.032 · Total 2.656
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.032 | 2.656 | 16.6% |
| Pass | 0.404 | 5.248 | 5.4% |
| Rush | -0.037 | -2.592 | 28.0% |
| 1st down | 0.303 | 13.614 | 18.9% |
| 2nd down | -0.273 | -7.086 | 15.9% |
| 3rd down | 0.216 | 2.165 | 10.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.123 | 8.873 | 19.7% |
| Passing downs | -0.518 | -6.217 | 8.6% |
Trae'shawn Brown · RBUsage 14.0% · Avg PPA 0.066 · Total 4.690
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.066 | 4.690 | 14.0% |
| Pass | -0.055 | -0.437 | 3.3% |
| Rush | 0.081 | 5.127 | 24.8% |
| 1st down | 0.121 | 5.330 | 18.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.021 | 0.533 | 15.2% |
| 3rd down | -0.587 | -1.173 | 2.1% |
| Standard downs | 0.132 | 7.664 | 15.8% |
| Passing downs | -0.229 | -2.974 | 9.3% |
Rico Scott · WRUsage 9.9% · Avg PPA 0.444 · Total 22.201
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.444 | 22.201 | 9.9% |
| Pass | 0.487 | 22.893 | 19.4% |
| Rush | -0.231 | -0.692 | 1.2% |
| 1st down | 0.181 | 4.342 | 10.1% |
| 2nd down | 0.690 | 10.346 | 9.1% |
| 3rd down | 0.683 | 7.513 | 11.5% |
| Standard downs | 0.267 | 8.812 | 9.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.788 | 13.389 | 12.1% |
Lotzeir Brooks · WRUsage 7.9% · Avg PPA 0.722 · Total 28.874
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.722 | 28.874 | 7.9% |
| Pass | 0.828 | 30.643 | 15.3% |
| Rush | -0.590 | -1.769 | 1.2% |
| 1st down | 0.593 | 6.520 | 4.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.484 | 6.772 | 8.5% |
| 3rd down | 1.007 | 14.097 | 14.6% |
| Standard downs | 0.550 | 11.006 | 5.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.893 | 17.868 | 14.3% |
Ryan Williams · WRUsage 7.9% · Avg PPA 0.540 · Total 16.750
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.540 | 16.750 | 7.9% |
| Pass | 0.781 | 21.874 | 15.6% |
| Rush | -1.708 | -5.124 | 1.5% |
| 1st down | 0.644 | 5.795 | 4.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.375 | 5.249 | 10.9% |
| 3rd down | 0.446 | 3.125 | 10.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.432 | 7.338 | 5.9% |
| Passing downs | 0.672 | 9.412 | 13.7% |
EJ Crowell · RBUsage 7.8% · Avg PPA 0.386 · Total 13.519
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.386 | 13.519 | 7.8% |
| Pass | -0.218 | -0.655 | 1.4% |
| Rush | 0.443 | 14.174 | 14.0% |
| 1st down | 0.007 | 0.145 | 10.5% |
| 2nd down | 1.095 | 9.853 | 6.2% |
| 3rd down | 0.880 | 3.521 | 4.8% |
| Standard downs | 0.167 | 4.853 | 8.8% |
| Passing downs | 1.444 | 8.666 | 5.1% |
Kevin Riley · RBUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.028 · Total 0.368
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.028 | 0.368 | 5.0% |
| Pass | 0.395 | 0.790 | 1.7% |
| Rush | -0.038 | -0.422 | 8.1% |
| 1st down | -0.032 | -0.158 | 4.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.115 | -0.802 | 8.0% |
| 3rd down | 1.328 | 1.328 | 2.1% |
| Standard downs | 0.008 | 0.092 | 6.1% |
| Passing downs | 0.138 | 0.277 | 2.5% |
Marshall Pritchett · TEUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 1.113 · Total 24.491
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.113 | 24.491 | 4.3% |
| Pass | 1.226 | 24.522 | 8.3% |
| Rush | -0.015 | -0.031 | 0.8% |
| 1st down | 0.898 | 8.976 | 4.2% |
| 2nd down | 0.392 | 1.962 | 3.0% |
| 3rd down | 1.921 | 11.528 | 6.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.988 | 14.815 | 4.1% |
| Passing downs | 1.382 | 9.677 | 5.0% |
Austin Mack · QBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.609 · Total 3.656
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.609 | 3.656 | 4.2% |
| Pass | 0.144 | 0.577 | 6.7% |
| Rush | 1.539 | 3.079 | 2.5% |
| 1st down | 0.518 | 1.037 | 2.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.584 | 1.752 | 6.0% |
| 3rd down | 0.867 | 0.867 | 4.2% |
| Standard downs | 1.083 | 3.248 | 2.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.136 | 0.407 | 8.1% |
Khalifa Keith · RBUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.389 · Total 1.166
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.389 | 1.166 | 3.8% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.389 | 1.166 | 6.3% |
| 1st down | -0.383 | -0.383 | 2.7% |
| 2nd down | -0.193 | -0.193 | 3.7% |
| 3rd down | 1.741 | 1.741 | 6.7% |
| Standard downs | -0.383 | -0.383 | 1.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.774 | 1.549 | 8.7% |
Josh Ford · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.745 · Total 2.978
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.745 | 2.978 | 3.4% |
| Pass | 0.745 | 2.978 | 6.6% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.442 | 2.883 | 3.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.047 | 0.095 | 5.4% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.745 | 2.978 | 5.3% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Kaleb Edwards · TEUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.995 · Total 13.929
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.995 | 13.929 | 3.2% |
| Pass | 0.995 | 13.929 | 6.5% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.706 | 4.235 | 2.9% |
| 2nd down | 1.215 | 4.862 | 2.8% |
| 3rd down | 1.208 | 4.832 | 4.7% |
| Standard downs | 0.675 | 6.755 | 3.2% |
| Passing downs | 1.794 | 7.175 | 3.1% |
Derek Meadows · WRUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.090 · Total 0.905
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.090 | 0.905 | 3.1% |
| Pass | 0.090 | 0.905 | 6.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.456 | 2.734 | 4.2% |
| 2nd down | -0.287 | -0.574 | 1.9% |
| 3rd down | -0.628 | -1.255 | 3.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.260 | 2.077 | 3.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.586 | -1.172 | 2.2% |
Noah Rogers · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 1.235 · Total 3.706
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.235 | 3.706 | 2.5% |
| Pass | 1.235 | 3.706 | 5.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.651 | 1.651 | 1.7% |
| 2nd down | 1.028 | 2.056 | 4.9% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 1.651 | 1.651 | 1.2% |
| Passing downs | 1.028 | 2.056 | 5.9% |
AK Dear · RBUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.232 · Total -0.464
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.232 | -0.464 | 1.7% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.232 | -0.464 | 3.3% |
| 1st down | -0.232 | -0.464 | 3.3% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.232 | -0.464 | 2.3% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Danny Lewis Jr. · TEUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.437 · Total -0.874
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.437 | -0.874 | 1.7% |
| Pass | -0.437 | -0.874 | 3.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.437 | -0.874 | 5.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.918 | -0.918 | 1.1% |
| Passing downs | 0.044 | 0.044 | 3.3% |
Cederian Morgan · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.949 · Total 1.897
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.949 | 1.897 | 1.6% |
| Pass | 0.949 | 1.897 | 3.2% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 2.632 | 2.632 | 1.6% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | -0.735 | -0.735 | 4.0% |
| Standard downs | 2.632 | 2.632 | 1.2% |
| Passing downs | -0.735 | -0.735 | 2.4% |
2026 · Through provider Week 8. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.246 | 85th138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.474 | 80th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.301 | 78th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | 0.416 | 88th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.142 | 64th138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | -0.037 | 87th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.368 | 80th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.293 | 23rd138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.179 | 77th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-10-30. Offense: 85% of 228 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.9 yards (80th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.3 per completion. Completion 67.1%, 9.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.54.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 68.6% | 59.0% | +9.6 | 194 / 228 |
| Defense allowed | 62.6% | 61.2% | +1.4 | 206 / 227 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Alabama.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 228 | 85% | 9.9 | 5.3 | 67.1% | 0.54 | +9.6 pp | 194 |
| Passing defense | 227 | 91% | 8.8 | 5.3 | 62.1% | 0.12 | +1.4 pp | 206 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 274 | 4.5 | 51.4% | 0.21 | 3.30 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 14.8% | 78.1% |
| Defense allowed | 279 | 3.1 | 33.1% | -0.04 | 2.60 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 20.7% | 64.7% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 270 / 274 | 260 | 14 | 21 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 194 / 243 · 79.8% |
| Defense allowed | 274 / 279 | 266 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 234 / 251 · 93.2% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +9.6 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | East Carolina | 31 | 0 | — | — | — | — | 0.28 | 49 | 4.9 | 0.29 |
| W2 | Kentucky | 23 | 23 | 69.6% | 61.0% | +8.5 pp | 8.5 | 0.18 | 40 | 3.9 | 0.25 |
| W3 | Florida State | 31 | 30 | 76.7% | 60.8% | +15.9 pp | 8.3 | 0.71 | 37 | 6.6 | 0.52 |
| W4 | South Carolina | 27 | 26 | 76.9% | 57.1% | +19.8 pp | 12.1 | 1.13 | 30 | 3.7 | 0.15 |
| W5 | Mississippi State | 24 | 24 | 75.0% | 53.6% | +21.4 pp | 13.5 | 0.99 | 36 | 5.2 | 0.32 |
| W6 | Georgia | 32 | 31 | 54.8% | 60.8% | -6.0 pp | 8.4 | 0.23 | 29 | 5.6 | 0.50 |
| W7 | Tennessee | 29 | 29 | 65.5% | 60.9% | +4.6 pp | 9.0 | 0.21 | 25 | 2.9 | -0.46 |
| W8 | Texas A&M | 31 | 31 | 64.5% | 57.9% | +6.6 pp | 10.5 | 0.68 | 28 | 2.4 | -0.19 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-10-30T11:16:37.416814+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
26 punts · 43.5 gross yards/punt · 41.1 net yards/punt
9 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 26/26 punts. Known net yards: 20/26 punts.
Our punt returns
8 returns · 5.8 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 · Texas A&M | 3 | 47.0 | 34.5 | 2/3 |
| Week 7 · Tennessee | 6 | 43.3 | 45.0 | 4/6 |
| Week 6 · Georgia | 5 | 38.6 | 36.3 | 3/5 |
| Week 5 · Mississippi State | 2 | 39.0 | 39.0 | 2/2 |
| Week 4 · South Carolina | 5 | 43.4 | 39.2 | 5/5 |