Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Situations and tempo

CFBD play-by-play and drives · 2014–2026 · raw PPA

Highlights third downs, net success by half, tempo and offensive half splits. League-wide tables remain unchanged.

2026 regular season through Week 8. Raw PPA; no opponent adjustment.

Compare third-down conversion and distance
Compare net success between halves

PPA by down and distance · 2026

League-wide mean points added per play; stronger shading is further from zero. Success rate in parentheses.

Down1-3 yds4-6 yds7-10 yds11+ yds
10.190 (67%)0.184 (58%)0.040 (45%)0.249 (27%)
2-0.018 (65%)0.153 (51%)0.226 (38%)0.256 (24%)
30.596 (65%)0.476 (44%)0.460 (33%)0.281 (17%)
4-0.115 (66%)-1.016 (44%)-1.387 (36%)-1.460 (24%)

By score state · 2026

Offense isPPASuccessPass rate
Trailing 9+-0.02339%58%
Trailing 1-80.05641%51%
Tied0.10943%47%
Leading 1-80.26746%45%
Leading 9+0.36550%39%

By quarter · 2026

QuarterPPASuccessPass rate
10.19945%48%
20.17444%51%
30.17745%47%
40.09642%45%
Net points per drive by starting field position2026: highlighted solid line · pooled 2014–2026: dashed line
1-10 yards to goal: 3.72 net points, TD 63%, n=7611-20 yards to goal: 4.08 net points, TD 59%, n=14321-30 yards to goal: 4.26 net points, TD 57%, n=22131-40 yards to goal: 4.07 net points, TD 50%, n=32241-50 yards to goal: 3.50 net points, TD 45%, n=50751-60 yards to goal: 3.10 net points, TD 40%, n=80361-70 yards to goal: 2.69 net points, TD 36%, n=157371-80 yards to goal: 2.04 net points, TD 28%, n=522781-90 yards to goal: 1.80 net points, TD 25%, n=134391-100 yards to goal: 1.22 net points, TD 20%, n=6831030507090yards to goal at the start of the drive →
Start (yds to goal)DrivesTDFGTurnoverNet pts / drive
1-107663%25%5%3.72
11-2014359%30%6%4.08
21-3022157%20%14%4.26
31-4032250%21%11%4.07
41-5050745%16%16%3.50
51-6080340%15%17%3.10
61-701,57336%12%17%2.69
71-805,22728%9%20%2.04
81-901,34325%8%17%1.80
91-10068320%6%20%1.22
Success rate by half · 2026138 offenses · first half x, second half y
Air Force: First-half success 49.5%; Second-half success 51.1%; First / second-half plays 214 / 284Akron: First-half success 44.8%; Second-half success 43.0%; First / second-half plays 250 / 265Alabama: First-half success 44.4%; Second-half success 51.7%; First / second-half plays 259 / 238App State: First-half success 40.3%; Second-half success 48.5%; First / second-half plays 243 / 239Arizona: First-half success 55.7%; Second-half success 43.8%; First / second-half plays 253 / 219Arizona State: First-half success 49.6%; Second-half success 37.8%; First / second-half plays 244 / 233Arkansas: First-half success 39.5%; Second-half success 46.4%; First / second-half plays 238 / 239Arkansas State: First-half success 48.0%; Second-half success 49.4%; First / second-half plays 256 / 239Army: First-half success 53.0%; Second-half success 51.3%; First / second-half plays 232 / 222Auburn: First-half success 33.8%; Second-half success 48.8%; First / second-half plays 240 / 246BYU: First-half success 53.3%; Second-half success 47.2%; First / second-half plays 231 / 199Ball State: First-half success 41.9%; Second-half success 39.4%; First / second-half plays 253 / 246Baylor: First-half success 40.6%; Second-half success 36.4%; First / second-half plays 288 / 264Boise State: First-half success 47.5%; Second-half success 47.5%; First / second-half plays 261 / 223Boston College: First-half success 36.9%; Second-half success 49.3%; First / second-half plays 222 / 223Bowling Green: First-half success 39.1%; Second-half success 40.5%; First / second-half plays 225 / 232Buffalo: First-half success 34.8%; Second-half success 37.7%; First / second-half plays 305 / 273California: First-half success 39.3%; Second-half success 37.7%; First / second-half plays 300 / 260Central Michigan: First-half success 42.1%; Second-half success 36.9%; First / second-half plays 228 / 244Charlotte: First-half success 39.3%; Second-half success 35.9%; First / second-half plays 201 / 192Cincinnati: First-half success 45.6%; Second-half success 49.4%; First / second-half plays 228 / 233Clemson: First-half success 36.2%; Second-half success 41.9%; First / second-half plays 265 / 205Coastal Carolina: First-half success 45.5%; Second-half success 36.3%; First / second-half plays 231 / 215Colorado: First-half success 43.2%; Second-half success 38.3%; First / second-half plays 227 / 253Colorado State: First-half success 46.9%; Second-half success 46.9%; First / second-half plays 245 / 228Delaware: First-half success 43.9%; Second-half success 40.9%; First / second-half plays 228 / 225Duke: First-half success 42.6%; Second-half success 41.9%; First / second-half plays 216 / 253East Carolina: First-half success 39.0%; Second-half success 35.6%; First / second-half plays 241 / 216Eastern Michigan: First-half success 41.4%; Second-half success 36.8%; First / second-half plays 319 / 277Florida: First-half success 46.5%; Second-half success 46.7%; First / second-half plays 256 / 242Florida Atlantic: First-half success 51.4%; Second-half success 41.7%; First / second-half plays 276 / 254Florida International: First-half success 42.6%; Second-half success 39.3%; First / second-half plays 237 / 247Florida State: First-half success 46.7%; Second-half success 40.5%; First / second-half plays 240 / 200Fresno State: First-half success 40.4%; Second-half success 42.2%; First / second-half plays 230 / 192Georgia: First-half success 57.5%; Second-half success 48.4%; First / second-half plays 200 / 223Georgia Southern: First-half success 44.6%; Second-half success 43.0%; First / second-half plays 233 / 242Georgia State: First-half success 51.0%; Second-half success 44.2%; First / second-half plays 245 / 224Georgia Tech: First-half success 44.5%; Second-half success 46.5%; First / second-half plays 229 / 200Hawai'i: First-half success 41.4%; Second-half success 42.3%; First / second-half plays 268 / 298Houston: First-half success 55.9%; Second-half success 50.8%; First / second-half plays 304 / 260Illinois: First-half success 48.8%; Second-half success 49.1%; First / second-half plays 211 / 218Indiana: First-half success 46.0%; Second-half success 45.8%; First / second-half plays 248 / 225Iowa: First-half success 47.3%; Second-half success 41.1%; First / second-half plays 245 / 185Iowa State: First-half success 42.0%; Second-half success 35.0%; First / second-half plays 207 / 217Jacksonville State: First-half success 49.3%; Second-half success 47.5%; First / second-half plays 199 / 219James Madison: First-half success 47.1%; Second-half success 47.2%; First / second-half plays 276 / 271Kansas: First-half success 42.6%; Second-half success 47.8%; First / second-half plays 244 / 255Kansas State: First-half success 47.9%; Second-half success 47.9%; First / second-half plays 259 / 236Kennesaw State: First-half success 42.9%; Second-half success 46.0%; First / second-half plays 219 / 239Kent State: First-half success 35.1%; Second-half success 34.4%; First / second-half plays 276 / 218Kentucky: First-half success 48.7%; Second-half success 49.8%; First / second-half plays 238 / 263LSU: First-half success 52.8%; Second-half success 49.8%; First / second-half plays 333 / 297Liberty: First-half success 51.1%; Second-half success 44.7%; First / second-half plays 227 / 217Louisiana: First-half success 41.1%; Second-half success 47.4%; First / second-half plays 265 / 274Louisiana Tech: First-half success 42.0%; Second-half success 41.5%; First / second-half plays 226 / 241Louisville: First-half success 50.0%; Second-half success 48.9%; First / second-half plays 214 / 225Marshall: First-half success 46.5%; Second-half success 43.1%; First / second-half plays 254 / 225Maryland: First-half success 41.4%; Second-half success 42.0%; First / second-half plays 256 / 219Massachusetts: First-half success 41.7%; Second-half success 43.4%; First / second-half plays 252 / 212Memphis: First-half success 50.4%; Second-half success 49.4%; First / second-half plays 246 / 312Miami (FL): First-half success 57.6%; Second-half success 47.4%; First / second-half plays 250 / 230Miami (OH): First-half success 48.7%; Second-half success 34.2%; First / second-half plays 236 / 225Michigan: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 42.0%; First / second-half plays 215 / 193Michigan State: First-half success 43.8%; Second-half success 41.3%; First / second-half plays 242 / 252Middle Tennessee: First-half success 41.8%; Second-half success 40.3%; First / second-half plays 213 / 196Minnesota: First-half success 44.6%; Second-half success 39.4%; First / second-half plays 213 / 221Mississippi State: First-half success 47.3%; Second-half success 47.5%; First / second-half plays 245 / 238Missouri: First-half success 43.5%; Second-half success 37.8%; First / second-half plays 255 / 222Missouri State: First-half success 44.3%; Second-half success 39.8%; First / second-half plays 237 / 201NC State: First-half success 48.7%; Second-half success 44.1%; First / second-half plays 238 / 247Navy: First-half success 46.2%; Second-half success 50.2%; First / second-half plays 238 / 219Nebraska: First-half success 46.4%; Second-half success 43.6%; First / second-half plays 274 / 227Nevada: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 44.2%; First / second-half plays 222 / 224New Mexico: First-half success 44.2%; Second-half success 38.3%; First / second-half plays 233 / 209New Mexico State: First-half success 36.6%; Second-half success 47.9%; First / second-half plays 235 / 213North Carolina: First-half success 48.1%; Second-half success 44.2%; First / second-half plays 208 / 197North Dakota State: First-half success 43.7%; Second-half success 35.5%; First / second-half plays 295 / 217North Texas: First-half success 50.0%; Second-half success 50.8%; First / second-half plays 236 / 250Northern Illinois: First-half success 38.7%; Second-half success 40.3%; First / second-half plays 212 / 211Northwestern: First-half success 48.3%; Second-half success 50.0%; First / second-half plays 211 / 232Notre Dame: First-half success 51.1%; Second-half success 50.8%; First / second-half plays 225 / 254Ohio: First-half success 50.0%; Second-half success 45.0%; First / second-half plays 262 / 231Ohio State: First-half success 54.3%; Second-half success 44.8%; First / second-half plays 267 / 210Oklahoma: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 38.4%; First / second-half plays 227 / 216Oklahoma State: First-half success 53.4%; Second-half success 49.3%; First / second-half plays 238 / 266Old Dominion: First-half success 33.0%; Second-half success 28.6%; First / second-half plays 264 / 224Ole Miss: First-half success 49.4%; Second-half success 50.4%; First / second-half plays 257 / 226Oregon: First-half success 38.4%; Second-half success 48.6%; First / second-half plays 242 / 251Oregon State: First-half success 52.8%; Second-half success 48.5%; First / second-half plays 271 / 229Penn State: First-half success 40.7%; Second-half success 43.4%; First / second-half plays 231 / 233Pittsburgh: First-half success 46.3%; Second-half success 45.2%; First / second-half plays 281 / 272Purdue: First-half success 48.1%; Second-half success 42.9%; First / second-half plays 239 / 226Rice: First-half success 40.0%; Second-half success 44.0%; First / second-half plays 260 / 234Rutgers: First-half success 44.9%; Second-half success 45.6%; First / second-half plays 225 / 239SMU: First-half success 51.0%; Second-half success 47.6%; First / second-half plays 245 / 231Sacramento State: First-half success 34.1%; Second-half success 46.2%; First / second-half plays 252 / 260Sam Houston: First-half success 36.9%; Second-half success 41.1%; First / second-half plays 214 / 226San Diego State: First-half success 37.4%; Second-half success 38.0%; First / second-half plays 249 / 242San José State: First-half success 39.3%; Second-half success 39.5%; First / second-half plays 252 / 261South Alabama: First-half success 44.8%; Second-half success 42.2%; First / second-half plays 248 / 251South Carolina: First-half success 46.4%; Second-half success 46.8%; First / second-half plays 274 / 220South Florida: First-half success 44.4%; Second-half success 49.8%; First / second-half plays 198 / 215Southern Miss: First-half success 41.8%; Second-half success 45.8%; First / second-half plays 256 / 227Stanford: First-half success 40.6%; Second-half success 38.5%; First / second-half plays 283 / 234Syracuse: First-half success 45.6%; Second-half success 41.7%; First / second-half plays 261 / 288TCU: First-half success 49.8%; Second-half success 39.2%; First / second-half plays 237 / 237Temple: First-half success 48.4%; Second-half success 37.8%; First / second-half plays 221 / 188Tennessee: First-half success 43.6%; Second-half success 48.8%; First / second-half plays 307 / 248Texas: First-half success 46.2%; Second-half success 40.8%; First / second-half plays 236 / 233Texas A&M: First-half success 44.6%; Second-half success 42.8%; First / second-half plays 280 / 262Texas State: First-half success 53.5%; Second-half success 47.7%; First / second-half plays 271 / 256Texas Tech: First-half success 50.6%; Second-half success 46.7%; First / second-half plays 241 / 227Toledo: First-half success 46.0%; Second-half success 43.8%; First / second-half plays 272 / 292Troy: First-half success 44.2%; Second-half success 35.6%; First / second-half plays 267 / 216Tulane: First-half success 35.4%; Second-half success 30.1%; First / second-half plays 215 / 196Tulsa: First-half success 38.1%; Second-half success 43.5%; First / second-half plays 265 / 246UAB: First-half success 41.7%; Second-half success 43.0%; First / second-half plays 235 / 223UCF: First-half success 46.6%; Second-half success 41.4%; First / second-half plays 221 / 215UCLA: First-half success 46.4%; Second-half success 48.6%; First / second-half plays 261 / 218UConn: First-half success 45.6%; Second-half success 44.0%; First / second-half plays 261 / 193UL Monroe: First-half success 37.8%; Second-half success 44.8%; First / second-half plays 196 / 252UNLV: First-half success 40.2%; Second-half success 37.1%; First / second-half plays 246 / 213USC: First-half success 52.8%; Second-half success 49.8%; First / second-half plays 290 / 269UTEP: First-half success 33.3%; Second-half success 37.9%; First / second-half plays 180 / 227UTSA: First-half success 49.6%; Second-half success 45.8%; First / second-half plays 270 / 264Utah: First-half success 52.5%; Second-half success 48.0%; First / second-half plays 255 / 231Utah State: First-half success 30.7%; Second-half success 40.1%; First / second-half plays 205 / 237Vanderbilt: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 43.9%; First / second-half plays 264 / 230Virginia: First-half success 48.2%; Second-half success 38.8%; First / second-half plays 253 / 286Virginia Tech: First-half success 49.0%; Second-half success 40.6%; First / second-half plays 306 / 271Wake Forest: First-half success 52.4%; Second-half success 43.6%; First / second-half plays 225 / 220Washington: First-half success 47.7%; Second-half success 38.5%; First / second-half plays 239 / 205Washington State: First-half success 37.9%; Second-half success 32.2%; First / second-half plays 251 / 267West Virginia: First-half success 47.1%; Second-half success 40.6%; First / second-half plays 291 / 303Western Kentucky: First-half success 39.6%; Second-half success 34.8%; First / second-half plays 268 / 236Western Michigan: First-half success 36.6%; Second-half success 47.6%; First / second-half plays 224 / 254Wisconsin: First-half success 42.2%; Second-half success 40.8%; First / second-half plays 211 / 196Wyoming: First-half success 45.0%; Second-half success 46.5%; First / second-half plays 238 / 213first-half success rate →second-half success rate →

Hover, tap, or focus a point for its name and values. Use arrow keys to move between points; Enter or Space keeps details open, Escape closes them.

Largest second-half swings, 2026
Team1st half2nd halfChange
Auburn · SEC33.8%48.8%+15.0 pts
Miami (OH) · Mid-American48.7%34.2%-14.5 pts
Boston College · ACC36.9%49.3%+12.4 pts
Sacramento State · Mid-American34.1%46.2%+12.0 pts
Arizona · Big 1255.7%43.8%-11.9 pts
Arizona State · Big 1249.6%37.8%-11.8 pts
New Mexico State · Conference USA36.6%47.9%+11.3 pts
Western Michigan · Mid-American36.6%47.6%+11.0 pts
Temple · American Athletic48.4%37.8%-10.7 pts
TCU · Big 1249.8%39.2%-10.5 pts
Tempo · seconds per play vs plays per game · 2026138 FBS offenses
Baylor: Seconds / play 19.9; Scrimmage plays / game 78.9; Games 7Auburn: Seconds / play 20.4; Scrimmage plays / game 69.4; Games 7West Virginia: Seconds / play 20.4; Scrimmage plays / game 74.3; Games 8San Diego State: Seconds / play 20.7; Scrimmage plays / game 61.4; Games 8Ole Miss: Seconds / play 20.9; Scrimmage plays / game 69.0; Games 7San José State: Seconds / play 21.3; Scrimmage plays / game 64.5; Games 8Southern Miss: Seconds / play 21.3; Scrimmage plays / game 69.0; Games 7Mississippi State: Seconds / play 21.6; Scrimmage plays / game 69.0; Games 7Florida Atlantic: Seconds / play 21.7; Scrimmage plays / game 75.7; Games 7Clemson: Seconds / play 22.0; Scrimmage plays / game 67.1; Games 7Kennesaw State: Seconds / play 22.1; Scrimmage plays / game 65.4; Games 7South Carolina: Seconds / play 22.3; Scrimmage plays / game 71.4; Games 7Stanford: Seconds / play 22.3; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 8Oregon: Seconds / play 22.4; Scrimmage plays / game 70.4; Games 7Tulane: Seconds / play 22.5; Scrimmage plays / game 58.7; Games 7Missouri State: Seconds / play 22.7; Scrimmage plays / game 62.6; Games 7Western Kentucky: Seconds / play 22.7; Scrimmage plays / game 72.0; Games 7Tulsa: Seconds / play 22.7; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 8Memphis: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 70.0; Games 8Syracuse: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 80.3; Games 7Texas Tech: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 66.9; Games 7Utah State: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 63.1; Games 7California: Seconds / play 22.9; Scrimmage plays / game 70.0; Games 8Oklahoma State: Seconds / play 22.9; Scrimmage plays / game 72.0; Games 7Maryland: Seconds / play 22.9; Scrimmage plays / game 67.9; Games 7LSU: Seconds / play 23.0; Scrimmage plays / game 79.0; Games 8Colorado: Seconds / play 23.1; Scrimmage plays / game 68.6; Games 7Texas State: Seconds / play 23.2; Scrimmage plays / game 75.3; Games 7Hawai'i: Seconds / play 23.2; Scrimmage plays / game 70.8; Games 8SMU: Seconds / play 23.3; Scrimmage plays / game 68.0; Games 7Washington State: Seconds / play 23.4; Scrimmage plays / game 64.8; Games 8Kansas: Seconds / play 23.4; Scrimmage plays / game 71.3; Games 7Toledo: Seconds / play 23.5; Scrimmage plays / game 70.8; Games 8Georgia Tech: Seconds / play 23.5; Scrimmage plays / game 61.3; Games 7App State: Seconds / play 23.6; Scrimmage plays / game 69.1; Games 7Virginia Tech: Seconds / play 23.6; Scrimmage plays / game 72.1; Games 8Missouri: Seconds / play 23.6; Scrimmage plays / game 68.1; Games 7UL Monroe: Seconds / play 23.7; Scrimmage plays / game 64.0; Games 7Tennessee: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 69.4; Games 8Washington: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 63.4; Games 7Old Dominion: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 61.0; Games 8North Texas: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 70.0; Games 7UNLV: Seconds / play 24.0; Scrimmage plays / game 65.6; Games 7Delaware: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 64.7; Games 7Nevada: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 7Wake Forest: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 65.0; Games 7Buffalo: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 72.8; Games 8Akron: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 64.4; Games 8East Carolina: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 66.3; Games 7Florida State: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 63.7; Games 7New Mexico State: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 64.0; Games 7NC State: Seconds / play 24.5; Scrimmage plays / game 69.3; Games 7Coastal Carolina: Seconds / play 24.5; Scrimmage plays / game 63.7; Games 7Pittsburgh: Seconds / play 24.6; Scrimmage plays / game 69.1; Games 8UCF: Seconds / play 24.7; Scrimmage plays / game 63.4; Games 7Colorado State: Seconds / play 24.7; Scrimmage plays / game 67.6; Games 7UTSA: Seconds / play 24.7; Scrimmage plays / game 66.8; Games 8Eastern Michigan: Seconds / play 24.8; Scrimmage plays / game 66.2; Games 9Sacramento State: Seconds / play 24.8; Scrimmage plays / game 64.0; Games 8UConn: Seconds / play 24.9; Scrimmage plays / game 65.1; Games 7Iowa: Seconds / play 24.9; Scrimmage plays / game 61.4; Games 7Oregon State: Seconds / play 25.0; Scrimmage plays / game 71.4; Games 7Florida: Seconds / play 25.0; Scrimmage plays / game 71.1; Games 7James Madison: Seconds / play 25.0; Scrimmage plays / game 68.8; Games 8Arkansas: Seconds / play 25.1; Scrimmage plays / game 68.1; Games 7Houston: Seconds / play 25.3; Scrimmage plays / game 70.5; Games 8Jacksonville State: Seconds / play 25.3; Scrimmage plays / game 60.9; Games 7South Alabama: Seconds / play 25.4; Scrimmage plays / game 71.3; Games 7Duke: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 67.0; Games 7Charlotte: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 57.0; Games 7Vanderbilt: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 61.8; Games 8Iowa State: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 60.6; Games 7Ball State: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 63.3; Games 8UTEP: Seconds / play 25.6; Scrimmage plays / game 58.1; Games 7UAB: Seconds / play 25.6; Scrimmage plays / game 66.3; Games 7Middle Tennessee: Seconds / play 25.6; Scrimmage plays / game 58.4; Games 7Georgia State: Seconds / play 25.7; Scrimmage plays / game 67.0; Games 7North Carolina: Seconds / play 25.7; Scrimmage plays / game 58.7; Games 7Oklahoma: Seconds / play 25.7; Scrimmage plays / game 63.3; Games 7Northern Illinois: Seconds / play 25.7; Scrimmage plays / game 60.4; Games 7Arizona State: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 68.1; Games 7Massachusetts: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 58.5; Games 8Marshall: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 68.4; Games 7Cincinnati: Seconds / play 25.9; Scrimmage plays / game 65.9; Games 7Texas A&M: Seconds / play 26.0; Scrimmage plays / game 67.8; Games 8Kentucky: Seconds / play 26.0; Scrimmage plays / game 63.8; Games 8Purdue: Seconds / play 26.0; Scrimmage plays / game 68.3; Games 7Troy: Seconds / play 26.0; Scrimmage plays / game 69.0; Games 7Sam Houston: Seconds / play 26.1; Scrimmage plays / game 62.9; Games 7Arizona: Seconds / play 26.1; Scrimmage plays / game 67.4; Games 7Virginia: Seconds / play 26.1; Scrimmage plays / game 67.4; Games 8Kent State: Seconds / play 26.1; Scrimmage plays / game 61.8; Games 8Michigan: Seconds / play 26.1; Scrimmage plays / game 59.3; Games 7North Dakota State: Seconds / play 26.1; Scrimmage plays / game 64.0; Games 8Georgia Southern: Seconds / play 26.2; Scrimmage plays / game 67.9; Games 7Louisville: Seconds / play 26.2; Scrimmage plays / game 62.7; Games 7USC: Seconds / play 26.2; Scrimmage plays / game 69.9; Games 8Alabama: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 62.1; Games 8Kansas State: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 70.7; Games 7Rice: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 61.8; Games 8TCU: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 67.7; Games 7Rutgers: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 66.3; Games 7Nebraska: Seconds / play 26.4; Scrimmage plays / game 71.6; Games 7Navy: Seconds / play 26.4; Scrimmage plays / game 65.3; Games 7Miami (OH): Seconds / play 26.5; Scrimmage plays / game 57.6; Games 8Texas: Seconds / play 26.5; Scrimmage plays / game 67.0; Games 7UCLA: Seconds / play 26.6; Scrimmage plays / game 68.4; Games 7Miami (FL): Seconds / play 26.7; Scrimmage plays / game 69.3; Games 7Utah: Seconds / play 26.8; Scrimmage plays / game 69.4; Games 7Central Michigan: Seconds / play 26.9; Scrimmage plays / game 59.0; Games 8Fresno State: Seconds / play 27.0; Scrimmage plays / game 60.3; Games 7Louisiana Tech: Seconds / play 27.0; Scrimmage plays / game 66.7; Games 7Illinois: Seconds / play 27.2; Scrimmage plays / game 61.4; Games 7BYU: Seconds / play 27.4; Scrimmage plays / game 62.6; Games 7Louisiana: Seconds / play 27.4; Scrimmage plays / game 67.4; Games 8Indiana: Seconds / play 27.4; Scrimmage plays / game 59.4; Games 8Temple: Seconds / play 27.5; Scrimmage plays / game 58.7; Games 7Florida International: Seconds / play 27.5; Scrimmage plays / game 69.1; Games 7Minnesota: Seconds / play 27.6; Scrimmage plays / game 62.0; Games 7Boston College: Seconds / play 27.6; Scrimmage plays / game 63.6; Games 7Northwestern: Seconds / play 27.6; Scrimmage plays / game 63.3; Games 7Notre Dame: Seconds / play 27.6; Scrimmage plays / game 68.4; Games 7Arkansas State: Seconds / play 27.7; Scrimmage plays / game 61.9; Games 8Wisconsin: Seconds / play 28.3; Scrimmage plays / game 58.1; Games 7Georgia: Seconds / play 28.4; Scrimmage plays / game 60.4; Games 7Western Michigan: Seconds / play 28.4; Scrimmage plays / game 59.8; Games 8New Mexico: Seconds / play 28.7; Scrimmage plays / game 63.1; Games 7Michigan State: Seconds / play 28.8; Scrimmage plays / game 62.4; Games 8Bowling Green: Seconds / play 28.9; Scrimmage plays / game 57.6; Games 8South Florida: Seconds / play 29.0; Scrimmage plays / game 59.0; Games 7Wyoming: Seconds / play 29.2; Scrimmage plays / game 57.0; Games 8Air Force: Seconds / play 29.4; Scrimmage plays / game 72.6; Games 7Ohio State: Seconds / play 29.4; Scrimmage plays / game 68.1; Games 7Penn State: Seconds / play 29.4; Scrimmage plays / game 66.3; Games 7Liberty: Seconds / play 29.4; Scrimmage plays / game 63.4; Games 7Ohio: Seconds / play 29.9; Scrimmage plays / game 62.4; Games 8Boise State: Seconds / play 30.0; Scrimmage plays / game 69.1; Games 7Army: Seconds / play 30.8; Scrimmage plays / game 64.9; Games 7seconds per play → (slower)scrimmage plays per game →

Hover, tap, or focus a point for its name and values. Use arrow keys to move between points; Enter or Space keeps details open, Escape closes them.

Fastest and slowest offenses, 2026
Teams / playplays / game
Baylor · Big 1219.978.9
Auburn · SEC20.469.4
West Virginia · Big 1220.474.3
San Diego State · Pac-1220.761.4
Ole Miss · SEC20.969.0
Penn State · Big Ten29.466.3
Liberty · Conference USA29.463.4
Ohio · Mid-American29.962.4
Boise State · Pac-1230.069.1
Army · American Athletic30.864.9
Field-goal expected points by yards to goalCFBD capture 2026-09-22
1231020304050yards to goal (attempt distance = yards to goal + 17) →

Expected points of a field-goal attempt from each yards-to-goal (make probability times three), as published by CFBD; distance is yards to goal plus 17. Expected points fall below 1.5 at 32 yards to goal and below 1.0 at 39.

Values by distance
Field-goal expected points at ten-yard steps
Yards to goalDistanceExpected points
0172.85
10272.65
20372.25
30471.64
40570.82
50670.00
60770.00
70870.00
80970.00
901070.00
Method

Source: starter_pack/data/plays/<season>/regular_*_plays.csv and drives/drives_<season>.csv. FBS offenses, regular season; plays with a PPA value and a down 1-4.

Success: gain >= 50% of distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th. PPA: CFBD predicted points added per play, provider raw values; no opponent adjustment.

Seconds per play: mean clock difference between consecutive plays in a drive, 0-120 s, same period. Net points per drive: offense points on the drive minus points the defense scored on it. Cells with fewer than 25 plays or drives are omitted.

These are league and team descriptions, not model inputs.