CFB/LABA BETTING INSTRUMENT
Menu
HISTORICAL ANALYSIS · 2025

Backtest results

The model did not beat the historical break-even rate at −110. Historical performance does not establish this week’s win probability.

ATS measures covering the spread. MAE is mean absolute margin error in points; lower is better. Binomial p measures evidence against a 50% cover-rate baseline, not the probability a pick will win.

Backtest results

ATS ACCURACY
50.5%
MODEL MAE
12.83
MARKET MAE
12.03
BINOM P
0.8596

break-even at -110: 52.4% · n= 511 graded (ATS) · n=516 projected (edges)

BucketNAccuracy
0-39851.0%
3-713464.9%
7-1418671.5%
14+9892.9%
|projected margin| buckets (pick accuracy)
BucketNAccuracy
0-323151.9%
3-717051.2%
7-1410143.6%
14+977.8%
|edge vs market| buckets (ATS)
WeekMatchupProjActual
12San José State @ Nevada-10.4+45.0
11San Diego State @ Hawai'i-14.9+32.0
8Old Dominion @ James Madison-5.2+36.0
10Fresno State @ Boise State+17.7-23.0
10Arizona @ Colorado+4.1-35.0
6Boston College @ Pittsburgh+2.1+41.0
7Old Dominion @ Marshall-13.3+24.0
7Louisiana Tech @ Kennesaw State-9.3+28.0
7South Florida @ North Texas+10.2-27.0
7Rice @ UTSA+10.9+48.0
7Iowa @ Wisconsin-0.5-37.0
14Fresno State @ San José State+8.4-27.0
12Northern Illinois @ Massachusetts-6.8-42.0
10James Madison @ Texas State+3.1-32.0
8UTSA @ North Texas+2.9+38.0
worst misses, by absolute error