C1 101
C1 101 · 6:19
A simple guide to all nine teams that qualified in our saved Weeks 6–8 snapshots. What the gap means, how the line changes it, and what happened next.
Jump to a chapter
Captions are included in the picture. The portrait video plays inline on phones and supports fullscreen.
Historical lines, not current offers. C1 is a model–spread gap rule, not a cover probability. Frozen cards and later qualifiers remain separate.
Read the explanation and sources
What C1 means
C one starts with a simple question. How far apart are our forecast and the spread? For Weeks six through eight, the gap had to reach fourteen points. That's a rule for sorting picks. It isn't a promise that a team will cover, or a percentage chance of winning. We'll walk through every team that qualified in our saved snapshots from those three weeks. Some qualified on the frozen card. Others qualified later, when the line changed. Those are different records, and we'll keep them separate.
Read the spread
First, a quick example. Minus eight means the team needs to win by more than eight points to cover. Plus eight means it can lose by fewer than eight and still cover. At exactly eight, it's a push. Our forecast is a predicted winning margin. Compare that margin with what the spread asks the team to do. The difference is the gap.
Missouri
Start with Missouri against Texas A and M. On the frozen Week six card, Missouri was minus two and a half. Our model expected a win by about twenty points. That left a seventeen point four seven gap, comfortably above fourteen. Missouri won twenty-seven to six. It covered that saved line. The forecast and result were close here, but that won't always happen.
UCLA
U C L A shows the other side of the spread. It was getting twelve and a quarter points against Oregon. Our model actually favored U C L A by about five. That disagreement produced a seventeen point zero two gap. U C L A won seventeen to fifteen. It covered, even though the game was much closer than the forecast suggested.
Alabama
Now the miss. Alabama was getting half a point against Georgia. Our model expected Alabama to win by about sixteen. The gap was sixteen point three eight, so it qualified. Georgia won twenty to seventeen. Alabama did not cover. A large disagreement can still come from a forecast that's wrong. This loss belongs in the explanation just as much as the wins do.
Wake Forest
Wake Forest was minus three against N C State. The model expected a win by about eighteen, leaving a fifteen point one two gap. Wake Forest won thirty-eight to fourteen and covered. Here, the final margin was even larger than the model expected.
Massachusetts
Massachusetts was getting two and a half against Miami of Ohio. The model expected Massachusetts to win by about thirteen. That made the gap fifteen point one seven. Massachusetts lost twenty to nineteen, but still covered. That's the distinction to remember. Picking against the spread is different from picking the winner.
Hawai'i
Hawaii was getting twenty-one against Arizona State. Our model expected Hawaii to lose by only about two. The gap was eighteen point six five. Hawaii lost thirty to twelve. That's an eighteen-point loss, so the twenty-one points were enough to cover. The model underestimated the loss by quite a bit, yet the saved pick still won. Those six frozen Week six picks finished five and one at their saved lines. That's a small historical sample, not an estimate of the next pick's chances.
Texas Tech
In Week seven, our Texas Tech forecast stayed at twenty-eight point six two against Arizona State. The frozen line was minus fourteen and a half. The gap was fourteen point one two, just above the C one threshold. Later, the spread moved to minus fifteen and three quarters. Same forecast. Tougher line. The gap shrank to twelve point eight seven, and the C one label switched off. Texas Tech won fifty-three to twenty-five. Both saved lines covered. The result doesn't erase the difference between those snapshots. The line changed. The forecast didn't.
San José State
San Jose State became a qualifier later in Week seven. It wasn't a C one pick on the frozen card. In the later qualifying snapshot, it was minus seven and a half against U T E P. The model expected a win by twenty-one point six nine. That left a fourteen point one nine gap. San Jose State won twenty-four to eleven and covered that line. We include it as a later qualifier, without adding it back into the frozen card.
TCU
That brings us to T C U against West Virginia in the saved Week eight card. The spread asked for an eight-point win. Our model projected twenty-two point five seven. The gap was fourteen point five seven. That cleared the rule, but only by just over half a point. In a scenario where the spread moves to minus nine, the gap drops to thirteen point five seven. The same forecast would no longer qualify. The passing matchup gives us something to investigate. It doesn't make the result certain. T C U had scored thirteen, ten, and seventeen in its previous three games. That's a clear reason to question whether the projected margin will show up. This snapshot has no result yet.
Keep the record
Three things to check. What's the forecast? What's the saved line? And what could make the forecast wrong? C one tells us the gap was large enough at that moment. It doesn't replace that last question. Know the gap. Check the risks. Keep the snapshot.
The six frozen Week 6 C1 picks finished 5–1 at their saved lines. This small historical sample is not an estimate of the next pick’s chances. San José State is a later Week 7 qualifier, not an addition to the frozen card. TCU’s passing figures are raw season context, separate from the model projection.