Miami (OH) RedHawks Football · 2026 Season Preview

Miami (OH) RedHawks

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#81
-2.9 overall · 1st of 13 in the MAC
Projection
8.6
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
9-3
30.7% of outcomes
Off / Def
111/48
National ranks · Connelly model: 8.4 avg wins

Executive read

Miami (OH) RedHawks is the highest-rated team in the MAC at #81 nationally. The profile is an above average defense (#48) paired with a poor offense (#111). Schedule math puts the season at 8.6 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 8.4. 2 games project as clear underdog spots (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati). The season turns on 1 close game: Western Michigan.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#81
-2.9 rating
Offense
#111
19.5 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#48
22.9 allowed · above average
Special teams
#16
+0.5 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#111
Defense#48
Special teams#16

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished7-7 6-3 #82 #114 #54 #16

Sideline

Chuck Martin — year 13, 72-74 career.

OC: Gus Ragland (NEW)
DC: Bill Brechin

Ragland former Redhawks QB promoted to OC; Brechin avg 43.8 def SP+ since 2022; Martin most proven MAC coach

Returning production

49% overall, ranked #84 nationally.

Offense 45% · Defense 52%

127 returning starts, 17 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 8.64 wins; Connelly's published model projects 8.4 (6.2 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #115. His model gives 98.1% odds of six-plus wins and 5.1% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-05@ Pittsburgh#41 / +6.5-11.918%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12vs Holy CrossFCS+24.696%Should win
Wk 32026-09-19@ Cincinnati#50 / +4.5-9.922%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26vs UConn#107 / -11.2+10.879%Lean win
Wk 52026-10-03vs Bowling Green#115 / -13.3+12.983%Should win
Wk 62026-10-10@ Massachusetts#137 / -30.9+25.596%Should win
Wk 72026-10-17vs Akron#127 / -19.5+19.192%Should win
Wk 82026-10-24@ Central Michigan#113 / -12.4+7.071%Lean win
Wk 102026-11-04vs Buffalo#110 / -11.9+11.581%Should win
Wk 112026-11-10vs Ohio#117 / -13.6+13.284%Should win
Wk 122026-11-17@ Kent State#128 / -20.1+14.786%Should win
Wk 132026-11-24@ Western Michigan#95 / -7.2+1.856%Swing

Opening third

2.16

expected wins across 4 games
Pittsburgh, Holy Cross, Cincinnati, UConn

Middle third

3.42

expected wins across 4 games
Bowling Green, Massachusetts, Akron, Central Michigan

Closing third

3.07

expected wins across 4 games
Buffalo, Ohio, Kent State, Western Michigan

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Miami (OH). Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
8.64
across 12 games
Bowl odds
99%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
MAC
13 teams rated

Win-total probability

5 wins0.9%
6 wins4.1%
7 wins12.9%
8 wins25.7%
9 wins30.7%
10 wins19.6%
11 wins5.5%
12 wins0.5%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Thomas Gotkowski vs David McComb vs Caleb Heavner

battle (3-way) limited sample

Gotkowski: 575 pass yds as redshirt frosh; McComb: Kansas transfer; Heavner: Fort Hays State D2 transfer; no clear spring winner

Top transfer

Rodney Nelson (RB, from Monmouth)
1802 rush yds 18 TDs; 3 200-yd games including back-to-back; will run behind most proven OL in conference; surefire star

Program context

Martin Era · 27-15
2023-25: 27-15 (.643) 69.7 avg SP+; 3 straight MAC title game appearances; 2014-15: 5-19 (.208) 120.0 avg; 2016-22: 40-40 (.500) 93.9 avg

Def Brechin · 43.8
Avg defensive SP+ ranking of 43.8 since Brechin hired in 2022; despite portal losses; awfully impressive

Buckley Surge
Buckley last 4 games: 67 carries 570 yds (8.5 ypc) 6 TDs vs first 10: 112 carries 433 (3.9) 3 TDs; WMU 33 PPG when over 5.0 ypc

DateMatchupWhy it matters
Oct. 24Miami at CMUBack-to-back CMU opportunities; title race insertion; Chippewas play only 1 team above 68th all year
Nov. 24Miami at WMUTwo most likely title game participants playing week before title game; could be huge elimination game; scheduling quirk
Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the MAC

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Miami (OH)#81-2.9#111#4849%#84
2Western Michigan#95-7.2#112#6851%#72
3Toledo#108-11.5#121#8433%#130
4Buffalo#110-11.9#126#8530%#135
5Central Michigan#113-12.4#116#9246%#100
6Bowling Green#115-13.3#128#8835%#124
7Ohio#117-13.6#134#7233%#129
8Eastern Michigan#121-15.0#115#11262%#24
9Akron#127-19.5#135#10640%#115
10Kent State#128-20.1#125#12748%#87
11Sacramento State#130-22.7#127#13132%#131
12Ball State#134-25.2#136#12836%#123
13Massachusetts#137-30.9#138#13646%#96

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (calibrated in analysis/06_power_ratings.ipynb). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.